"You have to treat Bangladesh the same as you treat Pakistan and the same as you treat India": Nasser Hussain

[gazza619]

People have problem with Jay Shah being head of ICC because he is son of Indian home minister.

However, PCBs head is home minister of Pakistan himself who also happens to be ACC chief. However, none of these hypocrites will say anything.

Jay Shah is not the problem. His policies are here.

 

[Bhaijaan]

Mark Butcher on Wisden: "Replacing Bangladesh with Scotland is a slight on the muslim world"

What kind of paindoo analysis is this lol.

Exactly.
They can't hide their Islamist agenda. Butcher very clearly mentioned PCB are supporting Bangladesh as a muslim nation. They brought religion to cricket and must be exposed.

Nasser has always had an axe to grind with Indian cricket and his double standards have always been exposed time and again. All the criticism of IPL ober the years and yet turning up for every little degenerate filth from Enlgish cricket like a shameless little man he's always been - Stanford T20s, T10s, 100S and what not.

 

[emranabbas]

He's a muslim.
Thats says everything.

Nasser hussain is an indian

 

[Banda298]

Nasser giving indians the taste of thier own medicie and now the bhangra has started on the other side...

Not in 1000 births can he give any taste of any medicine to the country he was actually born in .

He can eloquently protest

 

[Usman Chadda]

Nasser hussain is an indian

You can understand what’s more important for these idiots

 

[Devadwal]

Nasser hussain is an indian

Entire Pakistan is product of India but we have seen how they have becomes.

 

[Rajdeep]

Jay Shah is not the problem. His policies are here.

Pls list down what policies he implemented that is problematic for you

 

[Bhaag Viru Bhaag]

He's a muslim.
Thats says everything.

 

[rpant_gabba]

Why are britistani and Pak papers shying away from Zim issue? Why didn’t “everyone should be treated equal Nasser” play against Zim
In 2003 or write about lack of visa in 2009?

 

[Rana]

Why are britistani and Pak papers shying away from Zim issue? Why didn’t “everyone should be treated equal Nasser” play against Zim
In 2003 or write about lack of visa in 2009?

Just like Indians have been shying away from the Zimbabwe 2003 issue

Apparently it’s “security issues” if England did it but “no legal grounds” if Pakistan do it to India

 

[gazza619]

Pls list down what policies he implemented that is problematic for you

I am not going to waste my time talking in details about a fella like Jay Shah

If you like the man, good for you

 

[gazza619]

Exactly.
They can't hide their Islamist agenda. Butcher very clearly mentioned PCB are supporting Bangladesh as a muslim nation. They brought religion to cricket and must be exposed.

Nasser has always had an axe to grind with Indian cricket and his double standards have always been exposed time and again. All the criticism of IPL ober the years and yet turning up for every little degenerate filth from Enlgish cricket like a shameless little man he's always been - Stanford T20s, T10s, 100S and what not.

bhaijaan bro, I wanted to take a moment to address something and assure you that there's no need to get angry. Nasser and Butcher have no particular interest in Pakistan and Bangladesh. They're simply expressing their views as neutral observers.

From their perspective, they clearly see a danger to the future of cricket, which is why they are voicing their concerns.

Their intention is not to target any specific nation but to highlight potential issues that could affect the sport as a whole.

 

[BouncerGuy]

Ok wait.

Han g.... How much more wait???

Accept that you lied

 

[Rajdeep]

I am not going to waste my time talking in details about a fella like Jay Shah

If you like the man, good for you

Jay Shah became ICC head end of Dec 2024. All I want to know is what wrong step did he took?

You dont like him because -
1. He is Indian
2. He is kaffir
3. His father belongs to BJP
4. Modi is head of BJP.

So all of these is your own personal hatred. If you think about it rationally, Jay Shah didnt do anything wrong in his capacity as an ICC head to warrant hatred from you lot.

He has however done plenty of good work, which geriatric chairmans before him failed to do so. Empowered womens cricket, improved pay structure for smaller boards, getting cricket in Olympics etc etc.

The gora ICC heads before him were there only for paychecks.

 

[Bhaag Viru Bhaag]

I am not going to waste my time talking in details about a fella like Jay Shah

If you like the man, good for you

Even Amit Shah wouldn't waste his time on him.

 

[gazza619]

Jay Shah became ICC head end of Dec 2024. All I want to know is what wrong step did he took?

You dont like him because -
1. He is Indian
2. He is kaffir

I hold no blame towards you. Why would I? It is clear to me that the real issue lies with the media and bollywood movies. Take "Border 2" for example, it was a massive hit yet it portrayed such hateful values.

It's unfortunate how these elements can have such a significant impact on perceptions and attitudes.

 

[sweep_shot]

Nasser was always a classy fella.

This whole saga has exposed BCCICC to the world even more.

 

[Devadwal]

Han g.... How much more wait???

Accept that you lied

Find out my post Where I post the statement of Peter lalor - Australia journalist.

Being mod it's a easy job to find out for you. Mere pass itne notification hai ab m kase search karunga. Hint de di baki dekh lo.

 

[Bhaag Viru Bhaag]

Jay Shah became ICC head end of Dec 2024. All I want to know is what wrong step did he took?

You dont like him because -
1. He is Indian
2. He is kaffir
3. His father belongs to BJP
4. Modi is head of BJP.

So all of these is your own personal hatred. If you think about it rationally, Jay Shah didnt do anything wrong in his capacity as an ICC head to warrant hatred from you lot.

He has however done plenty of good work, which geriatric chairmans before him failed to do so. Empowered womens cricket, improved pay structure for smaller boards, getting cricket in Olympics etc etc.

The gora ICC heads before him were there only for paychecks.

You do realise you live in England, right? Or do you keep forgetting? Or are you in England for paychecks only? #HypocrisyTohHai

 

[BouncerGuy]

Find out my post Where I post the statement of Peter lalor - Australia journalist.

Being mod it's a easy job to find out for you. Mere pass itne notification hai ab m kase search karunga. Hint de di baki dekh lo.

You mentioned me... it is your job to present proof... I am waiting

 

[Devadwal]

You mentioned me... it is your job to present proof... I am waiting

Ab itni sari post hai kha se karu search, itna time ni hai? You can search Peter lalor below statement

*Pakistan is only relevant in the cricketing world due to rivalry with India; otherwise they are another Bangladesh "

You'll find out you reply there , or delete kar diya ho mod ho to kya pta

 

[Bhaijaan]

bhaijaan bro, I wanted to take a moment to address something and assure you that there's no need to get angry. Nasser and Butcher have no particular interest in Pakistan and Bangladesh. They're simply expressing their views as neutral observers.

From their perspective, they clearly see a danger to the future of cricket, which is why they are voicing their concerns.

Their intention is not to target any specific nation but to highlight potential issues that could affect the sport as a whole.

I respect people raising their voicea bout injustice.
I too say it openly Pakistan has been picked on a lot in Cricket and we need to be more fair.

But i have an axe to grind with Sky panelists and will not let these slimy anti hindus get away with it my dear.

 

[oatmeal]

its the truth, I dont know how anyone can argue otherwise. If India had refused to play a tournament citing government approval, ICC would have moved mountains to accommodate their concerns and reschedule the hosting venues. No tournament is financially feasible without India playing.

Teams are not treated equally, its based on the power and financial muscle. Same in geopolitics and same in sport

 

[DeadlyVenom]

Mark Butcher on Wisden: "Replacing Bangladesh with Scotland is a slight on the muslim world"

What kind of paindoo analysis is this lol.

Any link to this? I have tried to google it and your post is the only thing that comes up.

Would be interesting to see if its paindoo analysis by Butcher or paindoo interpretation by you.

 

[Rajdeep]

You do realise you live in England, right? Or do you keep forgetting? Or are you in England for paychecks only? #HypocrisyTohHai

I love England bro. Atleast I love the country I live. Cant say the same thing for others

 

[Rajdeep]

I hold no blame towards you. Why would I? It is clear to me that the real issue lies with the media and bollywood movies. Take "Border 2" for example, it was a massive hit yet it portrayed such hateful values.

It's unfortunate how these elements can have such a significant impact on perceptions and attitudes.

I dont watch Bollywood because it is mostly crap. The last good bollywood movie I have watched was Student Of the Year and that too only for Alia Bhatt

All I am asking from you is - what wrong did Jay Shah do in his capacity as ICC head. This simple question you are unable to answer. You hate him, we get it and I also listed the reason.

 

[hur rizvi]

That's a good point you make. BCCI asked the ICC and PCB to go ahead and host the CT, 2025 without India. Yet, they didn't. They should have because it would have set the precedent.​

Did ICC vote on whether to kick India out or not?