What's new

The Muslims of Myanmar: Has the UN failed the Rohingya?

According to joshila logic,SRK should be in Pakistan and Amir and Salman in Afghanistan


Waah [MENTION=76058]cricketjoshila[/MENTION] teri azmat ko salaam :salute
 
Now we are adding up on conspiracy theorists who are saying Soros is setting up the thing against Myanmar and that the Rohingya attacks are just fake news.

And oh, Malala is a western stooge for speaking up for the Rohingyas


From one novel peace prize laureate to anotha

The ethnic cleansing going on is mad
Even madder is that theres countries who trade openly with Myanmar
 
According to joshila logic,SRK should be in Pakistan and Amir and Salman in Afghanistan


Waah [MENTION=76058]cricketjoshila[/MENTION] teri azmat ko salaam :salute

Those days are in past.

Talk of today.I as an Indian citizen dont want any of these refugees in my country.

The Myanmarese can solve their problems its not my place or my countrys place to interfere.
 
So you are happy to have more of them then? They do call themselves Bengali's for sure. You can call them whatever you want.

what a bunch of misinformation. Rohingyas are not Bengalis by ethnicity. They have their own language as well. They have been living in Rakhine for hundreds of years and have developed their own culture, language, and society. The only thing they share with Bangladeshis is religion.

With that being said, I do agree that for humanitarian cause, BD should help them. And we have over the last few decades. The refugee camps had million plus Rohingyas and absorbed thousands more recently.
 
Its imperative that people also realise the attacks by ARSA on Myanmar military.

Whatever happened before cannot and should not be presented as a justification for the ongoing genocidal activities in Myanmar. I am sure most if not all of the indiscriminately murdered civilians had nothing to do with the initial attacks.

It's not as if the ethnic cleansing and widespread oppression, and persecution started recently just because the mainstream media has only started covering it properly in the past month or so. Rohingyas have been unjustly persecuted for years now.
 
Whatever happened before cannot and should not be presented as a justification for the ongoing genocidal activities in Myanmar. I am sure most if not all of the indiscriminately murdered civilians had nothing to do with the initial attacks.

It's not as if the ethnic cleansing and widespread oppression, and persecution started recently just because the mainstream media has only started covering it properly in the past month or so. Rohingyas have been unjustly persecuted for years now.
If you will google about ARSA attacks you will know what i am talking about.They have been going on for sometime.
 
If you will google about ARSA attacks you will know what i am talking about.They have been going on for sometime.

When did Arsa start?

The spokesman who talked to the Asia Times said Arsa had been training people since 2013. But their first attack was in October 2016, when they killed nine police officers

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-41160679


28 OCTOBER 2015

Exclusive: 'Strong evidence' of genocide in Myanmar

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2015/...vidence-genocide-myanmar-151024190547465.html
 
Just like blaming the victims in Kashmir and Palestine some of our neighbors have again tried to shift the blame on ARSA for instigating the current genocide. For them, I will only quote from Aung San Suu Kyi 's Nobel Prize acceptance speech, " whenever suffering is ignored, there will be seeds of conflict, for suffering degrades, embitters and enrages.!
 
what a bunch of misinformation. Rohingyas are not Bengalis by ethnicity. They have their own language as well. They have been living in Rakhine for hundreds of years and have developed their own culture, language, and society. The only thing they share with Bangladeshis is religion.

With that being said, I do agree that for humanitarian cause, BD should help them. And we have over the last few decades. The refugee camps had million plus Rohingyas and absorbed thousands more recently.

Rohingya's may not be Bengali's to you but most claim to be so. Living in another country for hundreds of years does not mean they are not ethnically Bengali's. It is like how Pakistani and Indian Punjabi's have the same root and Pakistani and Afghan Pathan's as well.

I can understand that Bangladesh can not afford to take them all in millions just like that. From what I have seen in the news you are really struggling to take care of the ones already there. Could be a major humanitarian tragedy if more were to follow.
 

Leave 2015, The Rohingyas have been in a tussle with the rest of Myanmar since a 1940s.They wanted Arakan to be included in East Pakistan.Jinnah refused to entertain it.Then Rohingya insurgency started in 1948 and it has been on and off since then,so this issue between Rohingyas and Myanmar govt is not new.The Rohingyas wanted to separate from Myanmar.Again a google about Rohingya insurgency will tell you the story.
 
Just like blaming the victims in Kashmir and Palestine some of our neighbors have again tried to shift the blame on ARSA for instigating the current genocide. For them, I will only quote from Aung San Suu Kyi 's Nobel Prize acceptance speech, " whenever suffering is ignored, there will be seeds of conflict, for suffering degrades, embitters and enrages.!

When did she give this speech? Suu Kyi didnt accept the Nobel.It was accepted by her teenage children on her behalf,at a time when Suu Kyi was under house arrest and didnt meet his children.
 
When did she give this speech? Suu Kyi didnt accept the Nobel.It was accepted by her teenage children on her behalf,at a time when Suu Kyi was under house arrest and didnt meet his children.

https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/...inally-delivered-her-nobel-acceptance-speech-

“Every day, everywhere, there are negative forces eating away at the foundations of peace,” Suu Kyi explained. “War is not the only arena where peace is done to death. Wherever suffering is ignored, there will be the seeds of conflict… for suffering degrades, embitters, and enrages.”
 
Rohingya's may not be Bengali's to you but most claim to be so. Living in another country for hundreds of years does not mean they are not ethnically Bengali's. It is like how Pakistani and Indian Punjabi's have the same root and Pakistani and Afghan Pathan's as well.

I can understand that Bangladesh can not afford to take them all in millions just like that. From what I have seen in the news you are really struggling to take care of the ones already there. Could be a major humanitarian tragedy if more were to follow.

no Rohingyas claim to be Bengali. But they technically do it to get BD passport and then go to Malaysia/Singapore or Middle Eastern countries.

If they were Bengalis, they would have been called Bengalis and not Rohingyas.

Anyway, to your point, of course BD will struggle to absorb and manage million plus refugees. We are not a developed first world country equipped to manage a huge influx of people. Plus these people can't integrate into society because they don't speak Bengali. So they can't find jobs and start to make a life for themselves.

Regardless of ethnicity, it is a humanitarian crisis and BD is not well equipped to handle this. We are doing the best but unfortunately it won't be enough. International community has started to pressure Myanmar (Pakistan included) and we will wait to see if that has any impact.
 
no Rohingyas claim to be Bengali. But they technically do it to get BD passport and then go to Malaysia/Singapore or Middle Eastern countries.

If they were Bengalis, they would have been called Bengalis and not Rohingyas.

Anyway, to your point, of course BD will struggle to absorb and manage million plus refugees. We are not a developed first world country equipped to manage a huge influx of people. Plus these people can't integrate into society because they don't speak Bengali. So they can't find jobs and start to make a life for themselves.

Regardless of ethnicity, it is a humanitarian crisis and BD is not well equipped to handle this. We are doing the best but unfortunately it won't be enough. International community has started to pressure Myanmar (Pakistan included) and we will wait to see if that has any impact.

I have met ones in Pak who do. As I say they are like Pak Pathans who call themselves Pakistani now even if they were born in Afghanistan. This is so they are not discriminated against.

They seem to speak decent Urdu that Bangladeshis do as well so there is a common language. From what I am seeing they are not going anywhere soon despite Hasina wanting them out. Bangladesh needs to talk to Mynamar telling them to behave themselves. With whole villages burnt the refugee's have nothing to go back to.

Even many developed countries would struggle with so many sudden new arrivals.
 
I have met ones in Pak who do. As I say they are like Pak Pathans who call themselves Pakistani now even if they were born in Afghanistan. This is so they are not discriminated against.

They seem to speak decent Urdu that Bangladeshis do as well so there is a common language. From what I am seeing they are not going anywhere soon despite Hasina wanting them out. Bangladesh needs to talk to Mynamar telling them to behave themselves. With whole villages burnt the refugee's have nothing to go back to.

Even many developed countries would struggle with so many sudden new arrivals.

for your bolded part --

Many who live here cannot even officially identify themselves as Rohingya. To avoid persecution and be accepted as naturalized citizens, many pretended to be Bengalis who migrated from East Pakistan before the 1971 war of independence, after which it became Bangladesh.
More --

Outside Myanmar, and perhaps now Bangladesh, Pakistan is home to the highest concentration of Rohingya in the world, from a previous exodus of Rohingya in the 1970s and ’80s. A vast majority live in neighborhoods that are distressingly impoverished even by Karachi’s standards.

Far From Myanmar Violence, Rohingya in Pakistan Are Seething
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/12/...column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news
 
Last edited:
Rohingya crisis: Sikh volunteers reach Bangladesh-Myanmar border to provide langar to refugees



A team of volunteers from Sikh organisation Khalsa Aid reached Bangladesh-Myanmar border Sunday night to provide relief to the lakhs of Rohingya Muslim families fleeing Myanmar. Speaking to The Indian Express over phone, Amarpreet Singh, managing director, Khalsa Aid, India who has reached Teknaf, a border town in Bangladesh where the refugees are living in the camps, said that condition at the border was “miserable to say the least”.
“It was our first day here today and we did a pre-assessment before launching a major relief operation. We had come prepared for providing relief to some 50,000 people, but there are more than three lakh refugees here. They are living without water, food, clothes and shelter. They are sitting wherever they can find a corner. It is raining, but people do not have anywhere to go. It is miserable to say the least. We will be providing them langar food (community kitchen) and shelter. We are arranging tarpaulins but since the number of refugees have overwhelmingly exceeded our preparations, it can some time to make arrangements,” he said.
He added that there were huge camps at Teknaf and each one was crowded beyond its capacity. “A camp can accommodate at least 50,000 people but in most of them there are more than one lakh refugees. But we are committed to run langar here (community here) till the crisis is not over. The priority is to not let anyone sleep without food. Children are roaming without clothes and begging for food. Those who do not get space in camps are sitting along roads in hope of getting food from someone,” he added.

Khalsa Aid team is now serving langar and water to the refugees. “Teknaf is almost 10 hours ride from the capital Dhaka from where we are ferrying all the material needed to prepare langar. Connectivity issues and rain are creating hindrances but we are trying our best to provide food to the maximum people at the earliest. The langar will continue here till crisis is not over and refugees continue to reach the border,” he added.
Another team of Khalsa Aid volunteers is expected to reach the border town Teknaf in coming days to assist in the relief operations, said Amarpreet.

Jeevanjyot Singh, a Khalsa Aid volunteer from Jammu & Kashmir who is also in Teknaf, said that refugees started from Myanmar by foot almost ten days back and then reached Teknaf through boats. “They are in an extremely bad state as of now. They have nowhere to go.
We have spoken to some families and they have told us that after crossing thick jungles on foot in Myanmar, they crossed border through boats and then resumed journey on foot. Most of them have traveled for more than ten days. Since then, children had no food or water. They are in dire need of food and water,” he said.
Myanmar led by its state counsellor Aung San Suu Kyi has been rapped by the United Nations for gross human rights violation against the tribe of Rohingya Muslims and as per UN estimates, 2.70 lakh Rohingya Muslims have already fled to Bangladesh and even more are trapped at the border.

http://indianexpress.com/article/in...border-to-provide-langar-to-refugees-4839349/
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Given human rights abuses against Rohingya, I will seek to remove military cooperation w/ <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Burma?src=hash">#Burma</a> from <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/FY18NDAA?src=hash">#FY18NDAA</a> <a href="https://t.co/n1cyCx9M6s">https://t.co/n1cyCx9M6s</a></p>— John McCain (@SenJohnMcCain) <a href="https://twitter.com/SenJohnMcCain/status/907728776108363781">September 12, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" data-cards="hidden" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">My Latest: Were he a Muslim, Wirathu would be added to terrorism sanctions list while US drones fly over Burma.<a href="https://t.co/hrIQvmMq7j">https://t.co/hrIQvmMq7j</a></p>— CJ Werleman (@cjwerleman) <a href="https://twitter.com/cjwerleman/status/907648331194572800">September 12, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
So what is Pak Rohingya's are mad? That is how it should be. I have not said there are no Rohingya in Pak, it is the Banngleadeshis who are rejecting them. Where ever they may be they are ethnically Bengali.

once again, read the article again. that person said they 'pretended' to be Bengali to migrate to Karachi. That statement is coming from a Rohingya himself. If he was Bengali, they why even bother to pretend?

I am not sure why you are buying into Myanmar's propaganda that Rohingyas are Bengalis (and terrorist) who are not native to their country. If you think they are, then you are indirectly providing your support for their persecution which UN termed as "textbook ethnic cleansing".

second, Bangladeshis are not rejecting them. We have million plus Rohingya refugees for 3 decades. And this week took another 700 hundred thousand. There were rallies/protest all over the country against their persecution. The civic society urged the government to accept them and they did. Million plus existing and now almost another million. That is a lot of refugees for a small and poor country like BD.
 

UN acknowledging and bringing change are two different thing. We all know UN is as useless as it gets. What exactly UN did to stop the massacre? Or planning to do?

Again, ill ask the same question as [MENTION=132715]Varun[/MENTION] did, "Has change.org ever managed to change anything?" And i dont mean people/govt/organisation acknowledging and doing nothing, a proper change being implemented.
 
once again, read the article again. that person said they 'pretended' to be Bengali to migrate to Karachi. That statement is coming from a Rohingya himself. If he was Bengali, they why even bother to pretend?

I am not sure why you are buying into Myanmar's propaganda that Rohingyas are Bengalis (and terrorist) who are not native to their country. If you think they are, then you are indirectly providing your support for their persecution which UN termed as "textbook ethnic cleansing".

second, Bangladeshis are not rejecting them. We have million plus Rohingya refugees for 3 decades. And this week took another 700 hundred thousand. There were rallies/protest all over the country against their persecution. The civic society urged the government to accept them and they did. Million plus existing and now almost another million. That is a lot of refugees for a small and poor country like BD.

I am talking about the Rohngya situation in Myanmar insisting Bangladesh should help them out. By pretending to be Bengali he could mean "pretending to be Bangladeshi". Yes, I believe they are Bengalis with roots in Bangladesh even though most are now born in Myanmar and have been for years. As I said before it is like Pak Pathans who mostly have roots in Afghanistan. It is good that Bangladesh is accepting them albeit not out of choice. In the long run most Muslim countries can take a few thousand each instead of begging the UN to help. I do not know what you are on about accusing me off supporting their persecution by insisting they are of Bangladeshi ethnicity.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-cards="hidden" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">US VP Pence presses UN Security Council to stop Myanmar security forces' "terrible savagery" toward Rohingya Muslims <a href="https://t.co/ZMbcdf6R0B">https://t.co/ZMbcdf6R0B</a> <a href="https://t.co/K9i43KN9cu">pic.twitter.com/K9i43KN9cu</a></p>— Kenneth Roth (@KenRoth) <a href="https://twitter.com/KenRoth/status/910647992272736257">September 20, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Saudi Arabia condemns Myanmar government 'policy of repression' <a href="https://t.co/Kh2ue3acgg">https://t.co/Kh2ue3acgg</a> <a href="https://t.co/UcGQBxmYBF">pic.twitter.com/UcGQBxmYBF</a></p>— Reuters Top News (@Reuters) <a href="https://twitter.com/Reuters/status/911699208746491904">September 23, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Rohingya Muslims fear the UN failed them

The UN leadership in Myanmar tried to stop the Rohingya rights issue being raised with the government, sources in the UN and aid community told the BBC.

One former UN official said the head of the UN in Myanmar (Burma) tried to prevent human rights advocates from visiting sensitive Rohingya areas.

More than 500,000 Rohingya have fled an offensive by the military, with many now sheltering in camps in Bangladesh.

The UN in Myanmar "strongly disagreed" with the BBC findings.

In the month since Rohingya Muslims began flowing into Bangladesh, the UN has been at the forefront of the response. It has delivered aid and made robust statements condemning the Burmese authorities.

But sources within the UN and the aid community both in Myanmar and outside have told the BBC that, in the four years before the current crisis, the head of the United Nations Country Team (UNCT), a Canadian called Renata Lok-Dessallien:

tried to stop human rights activists travelling to Rohingya areas

attempted to shut down public advocacy on the subject

isolated staff who tried to warn that ethnic cleansing might be on the way.

One aid worker, Caroline Vandenabeele, had seen the warning signs before. She worked in Rwanda in the run-up to the genocide in late 1993 and early 1994 and says when she first arrived in Myanmar she noticed worrying similarities.

"I was with a group of expats and Burmese business people talking about Rakhine and Rohingya and one of the Burmese people just said 'we should kill them all as if they are just dogs'. For me, this level of dehumanisation of humans is one sign that you have reached a level of acceptance in society that this is normal."

For more than a year I have been corresponding with Ms Vandenabeele, who has served in conflict areas such as Afghanistan, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Rwanda and Nepal.

Between 2013 and 2015 she had a crucial job in the UNCT in Myanmar. She was head of office for what is known as the resident co-ordinator, the top UN official in the country, currently Ms Dessallien.

The job gave Ms Vandenabeele a front-row seat as the UN grappled with how to respond to rising tensions in Rakhine state.

Back in 2012, clashes between Rohingya Muslims and Rakhine Buddhists left more than 100 dead and more than 100,000 Rohingya Muslims in camps around the state capital, Sittwe.

Since then, there have been periodic flare-ups and, in the past year, the emergence of a Rohingya militant group. Attempts to deliver aid to the Rohingya have been complicated by Rakhine Buddhists who resent the supply of aid for the Rohingya, at times blocking it and even attacking aid vehicles.

It presented a complex emergency for the UN and aid agencies, who needed the co-operation of the government and the Buddhist community to get basic aid to the Rohingya.

At the same time they knew that speaking up about the human rights and statelessness of the Rohingya would upset many Buddhists.

So the decision was made to focus on a long-term strategy. The UN and the international community prioritised long-term development in Rakhine in the hope that eventually increased prosperity would lead to reduced tensions between the Rohingya and the Buddhists.

For UN staff it meant that publicly talking about the Rohingya became almost taboo. Many UN press releases about Rakhine avoided using the word completely. The Burmese government does not even use the word Rohingya or recognise them as a distinct group, preferring to call them "Bengalis".

During my years reporting from Myanmar, very few UN staff were willing to speak frankly on the record about the Rohingya. Now an investigation into the internal workings of the UN in Myanmar has revealed that even behind closed doors the Rohingyas' problems were put to one side.

Multiple sources in Myanmar's aid community have told the BBC that at high-level UN meetings in Myanmar any question of asking the Burmese authorities to respect the Rohingyas' human rights became almost impossible.

Ms Vandenabeele said it soon became clear to everyone that raising the Rohingyas' problems, or warning of ethnic cleansing in senior UN meetings, was simply not acceptable.

"Well you could do it but it had consequences," she said. "And it had negative consequences, like you were no longer invited to meetings and your travel authorisations were not cleared. Other staff were taken off jobs - and being humiliated in meetings. An atmosphere was created that talking about these issues was simply not on."

Repeat offenders, like the head of the UN's Office for the Co-ordination for Humanitarian Assistance (UNOCHA) were deliberately excluded from discussions.

Ms Vandenabeele told me she was often instructed to find out when the UNOCHA representative was out of town so meetings could be held at those times. The head of UNOCHA declined to speak to the BBC but it has been confirmed by several other UN sources inside Myanmar.

Ms Vandenabeele said she was labelled a troublemaker and frozen out of her job for repeatedly warning about the possibility of Rohingya ethnic cleansing. This version of events has not been challenged by the UN.

Attempts to restrict those talking about the Rohingya extended to UN officials visiting Myanmar. Tomas Quintana is now the UN special rapporteur for human rights in North Korea but for six years, until 2014, held that same role for Myanmar.

Speaking from Argentina, he told me about being met at Yangon airport by Ms Dessallien.

"I received this advice from her - saying you should not go to northern Rakhine state - please don't go there. So I asked why and there was not an answer in any respect, there was just the stance of not trying to bring trouble with the authorities, basically," he said.

"This is just one story, but it demonstrates what was the strategy of the UN Country Team in regards to the issue of the Rohingya."

Mr Quintana still went to northern Rakhine but said Ms Dessallien "disassociated" herself from his mission and he didn't see her again.

One senior UN staffer told me: "We've been pandering to the Rakhine community at the expense of the Rohingya.

"The government knows how to use us and to manipulate us and they keep on doing it - we never learn. And we can never stand up to them because we can't upset the government."

The UN's priorities in Rakhine were examined in a report commissioned by the UN in 2015 entitled "Slippery Slope: Helping Victims or Supporting Systems of Abuse".

Leaked to the BBC, it is damning of the UNCT approach.

"The UNCT strategy with respect to human rights focuses too heavily on the over-simplified hope that development investment itself will reduce tensions, failing to take into account that investing in a discriminatory structure run by discriminatory state actors is more likely to reinforce discrimination than change it."

There have been other documents with similar conclusions. With António Guterres as the new secretary general in New York, a former senior member of the UN was asked to write a memo for his team in April.

Titled "Repositioning the UN" the two-page document was damning in its assessment, calling the UN in Myanmar "glaringly dysfunctional".

In the weeks that followed the memo, the UN confirmed that Ms Dessallien was being "rotated" but stressed it was nothing to do with her performance. Three months on Ms Dessallien is still the UN's top official there after the Burmese government rejected her proposed successor.

"She has a fair view and is not biased," Shwe Mann, a former senior general and close ally of Myanmar's de facto leader Aung San Suu Kyi, told me. "Whoever is biased towards the Rohingyas, they won't like her and they will criticise her."

Ms Dessallien declined to give an interview to the BBC to respond to this article.

The UN in Myanmar said its approach was to be "fully inclusive" and ensure the participation of all relevant experts.

"We strongly disagree with the accusations that the resident co-ordinator 'prevented' internal discussions. The resident co-ordinator regularly convenes all UN agencies in Myanmar to discuss how to support peace and security, human rights, development and humanitarian assistance in Rakhine state," a statement from a UN spokesperson in Yangon said.

On Tomas Quintana's visits to Rakhine, the spokesperson said Ms Dessallien had "provided full support" in terms of personnel, logistics and security.

Ten ambassadors, including from Britain and the United States, wrote unsolicited emails to the BBC when they heard we were working on this report, expressing their support for Ms Dessallien.

There are those who see similarities between the UN's much-criticised role in Sri Lanka and what has happened in Myanmar. Charles Petrie wrote a damning report into the UN and Sri Lanka, and also served as the UN's top official in Myanmar (before being expelled in 2007).

He said the UN's response to the Rohingya over the past few years had been confused and that Ms Dessallien hadn't been given the mandate to bring all of the key areas together.

"I think the key lesson for Myanmar from Sri Lanka is the lack of a focal point. A senior level focal point addressing the situation in Myanmar in its totality - the political, the human rights, the humanitarian and the development. It remains diffuse. And that means over the last few years there have been almost competing agendas."

So might a different approach from the UN and the international community have averted the humanitarian disaster we are seeing now? It's hard to see how it might have deterred the Burmese army's massive response following the 25 August Rohingya militant attack.

Ms Vandenabeele said she at least believed an early warning system she proposed might have provided some indications of what was about to unfold.

"It's hard to say which action would have been able to prevent this," she told me. "But what I know for sure is that the way it was done was never going to prevent it. The way it was done was simply ignoring the issue."

Mr Quintana said he wished the international community had pushed harder for some sort of transitional justice system as part of the move to a hybrid democratic government.

One source said the UN now appeared to be preparing itself for an inquiry into its response to Rakhine, and this could be similar to the inquiry that came after the controversial end to Sri Lanka's civil war - and which found it wanting.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-41420973
 
Sri Lankan Buddhist monks attack Rohingya refugee houses

A group of Buddhist monks belonging to an extremist Sri Lankan nationalist organisation attacked on Tuesday houses of Rohingya Muslim refugees on the outskirts of the capital, forcing the police to arrest the “illegal immigrants”.

The 31 refugees, including women and children, were sent away to the detention camp at Boosa in South Sri Lanka.

https://www.dawn.com/news/1360350/sri-lankan-buddhist-monks-attack-rohingya-refugee-houses

Is there any particular reason why these type of news from South Asia are being ignored.
 
Sri Lankan Buddhist monks attack Rohingya refugee houses

A group of Buddhist monks belonging to an extremist Sri Lankan nationalist organisation attacked on Tuesday houses of Rohingya Muslim refugees on the outskirts of the capital, forcing the police to arrest the “illegal immigrants”.

The 31 refugees, including women and children, were sent away to the detention camp at Boosa in South Sri Lanka.

https://www.dawn.com/news/1360350/sri-lankan-buddhist-monks-attack-rohingya-refugee-houses

Is there any particular reason why these type of news from South Asia are being ignored.

Rohingyas reached Srilanka? How?
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en-gb"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Tory MP <a href="https://twitter.com/willquince?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@willquince</a> says he visited Rohingya refugee camps and asks Theresa May what the govt is doing to prevent a "humanitarian disaster". <a href="https://t.co/GABf7BoQcm">pic.twitter.com/GABf7BoQcm</a></p>— Channel 4 News (@Channel4News) <a href="https://twitter.com/Channel4News/status/918158134178467844?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">11 October 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
‘No such thing as Rohingya’: Myanmar erases a history

SITTWE, Myanmar — He was a member of the Rohingya student union in college, taught at a public high school and even won a parliamentary seat in Myanmar’s thwarted elections in 1990.

But according to the government of Myanmar, U Kyaw Min’s fellow Rohingya do not exist.

A long-persecuted Muslim minority concentrated in Myanmar’s western state of Rakhine, the Rohingya have been deemed dangerous interlopers from neighboring Bangladesh. Today, they are mostly stateless, their very identity denied by the Buddhist-majority Myanmar state.

“There is no such thing as Rohingya,” said U Kyaw San Hla, an officer in Rakhine’s state security ministry. “It is fake news.”

Such denials bewilder Mr. Kyaw Min. He has lived in Myanmar all of his 72 years, and the history of the Rohingya as a distinct ethnic group in Myanmar stretches back for generations before.

Now, human rights watchdogs warn that much of the evidence of the Rohingya’s history in Myanmar is in danger of being eradicated by a military campaign the United States has declared to be ethnic cleansing.

Since late August, more than 620,000 Rohingya Muslims, about two-thirds of the population that lived in Myanmar in 2016, have fled to Bangladesh, driven out by the military’s systematic campaign of massacre, rape and arson in Rakhine.

In a report released in October, the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights said that Myanmar’s security forces had worked to “effectively erase all signs of memorable landmarks in the geography of the Rohingya landscape and memory in such a way that a return to their lands would yield nothing but a desolate and unrecognizable terrain.”

“The Rohingya are finished in our country,” said Mr. Kyaw Min, who lives in Yangon, the commercial capital of Myanmar. “Soon we will all be dead or gone.”

The United Nations report also said that the crackdown in Rakhine had “targeted teachers, the cultural and religious leadership, and other people of influence in the Rohingya community in an effort to diminish Rohingya history, culture and knowledge.”

“We are people with our own history and traditions,” said U Kyaw Hla Aung, a Rohingya lawyer and former political prisoner, whose father served as a court clerk in Sittwe, the capital of Rakhine.

“How can they pretend we are nothing?” he asked.

Speaking over the phone, Mr. Kyaw Hla Aung, who has been jailed repeatedly for his activism and is now interned in a Sittwe camp, said his family did not have enough food because officials have prevented full distribution of international aid.

Myanmar’s sudden amnesia about the Rohingya is as bold as it is systematic. Five years ago, Sittwe, nestled in an estuary in the Bay of Bengal, was a mixed city, divided between an ethnic Rakhine Buddhist majority and the Rohingya Muslim minority.

Walking Sittwe’s crowded bazaar in 2009, I saw Rohingya fishermen selling seafood to Rakhine women. Rohingya professionals practiced law and medicine. The main street in town was dominated by the Jama mosque, an Arabesque confection built in the mid-19th century. The imam spoke proudly of Sittwe’s multicultural heritage.

But since sectarian riots in 2012, which resulted in a disproportionate number of Rohingya casualties, the city has been mostly cleared of Muslims. Across central Rakhine, about 120,000 Rohingya, even those who had citizenship, have been interned in camps, stripped of their livelihoods and prevented from accessing proper schools or health care.

They cannot leave the ghettos without official authorization. In July, a Rohingya man who was allowed out for a court appearance in Sittwe was lynched by an ethnic Rakhine mob.

The Jama mosque now stands disused and moldering, behind barbed wire. Its 89-year-old imam is interned.

“We have no rights as human beings,” he said, asking not to use his name because of safety concerns. “This is state-run ethnic cleansing and nothing else.”

Sittwe’s psyche has adapted to the new circumstances. In the bazaar recently, every Rakhine resident I talked to claimed, falsely, that no Muslims had ever owned shops there.

Sittwe University, which used to enroll hundreds of Muslim students, now only teaches around 30 Rohingya, all of whom are in a distance-learning program.

“We don’t have restrictions on any religion,” said U Shwe Khaing Kyaw, the university’s registrar, “but they just don’t come.”

Mr. Kyaw Min used to teach in Sittwe, where most of his students were Rakhine Buddhists. Now, he said, even Buddhist acquaintances in Yangon are embarrassed to talk with him.

“They want the conversation to end quickly because they don’t want to think about who I am or where I came from,” he said.

In 1990, Mr. Kyaw Min won a seat in Parliament as part of a Rohingya party aligned with the National League for Democracy, Myanmar’s current governing party. But the country’s military junta ignored the electoral results nationwide. Mr. Kyaw Min ended up in prison.

Rohingya Muslims have lived in Rakhine for generations, their Bengali dialect and South Asian features often distinguishing them from Rakhine Buddhists.

During the colonial era, the British encouraged South Asian rice farmers, merchants and civil servants to migrate to what was then known as Burma.

Some of these new arrivals mixed with the Rohingya, then known more commonly as Arakanese Indians or Arakanese Muslims. Others spread out across Burma. By the 1930s, South Asians, both Muslim and Hindu, comprised the largest population in Yangon.

The demographic shift left some Buddhists feeling besieged. During the xenophobic leadership of Gen. Ne Win, who ushered in nearly half a century of military rule, hundreds of thousands of South Asians fled Burma for India.

Rakhine, on Burma’s western fringe, was where Islam and Buddhism collided most violently, especially after World War II, during which the Rakhine supported the Axis and Rohingya the Allies.

Later attempts by a Rohingya insurgent group to exit Burma and attach northern Rakhine to East Pakistan, as Bangladesh was then known, further strained relations.

By the 1980s, the military junta had stripped most Rohingya of citizenship. Brutal security offensives drove waves of Rohingya to flee the country.

Today, far more Rohingya live outside of Myanmar — mostly in Bangladesh, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Malaysia — than remain in what they consider their homeland.

Yet in the early decades of Burma’s independence, a Rohingya elite thrived. Rangoon University, the country’s top institution, had enough Rohingya students to form their own union. One of the cabinets of U Nu, the country’s first post-independence leader, included a health minister who identified himself as Arakanese Muslim.

Even under Ne Win, the general, Burmese national radio aired broadcasts in the Rohingya language. Rohingya, women among them, were represented in Parliament.

U Shwe Maung, a Rohingya from Buthidaung Township in northern Rakhine, served in Parliament between 2011 and 2015, as a member of the military’s proxy Union Solidarity and Development Party. In the 2015 elections, however, he was barred from running.

Hundreds of thousands of Rohingya were disenfranchised in those polls.

Mr. Shwe Maung’s electoral district, which had been 90 percent Rohingya, is now represented by a Rakhine Buddhist.

In September, a local police officer filed a counterterrorism suit accusing Mr. Shwe Maung of instigating violence through Facebook posts that called for an end to the security offensive in Rakhine. (The military operation began after Rohingya militants besieged government security posts in late August.)

Mr. Shwe Maung, the son of a police officer himself, is in exile in the United States and denies the charges.

“They want every Rohingya to be considered a terrorist or an illegal immigrant,” he said. “We are much more than that.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/02/world/asia/myanmar-rohingya-denial-history.html
 
Last edited:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I've written to <a href="https://twitter.com/theresa_may?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Theresa_May</a> urging the Government act now to help end the suffering of the Rohingya people and bring about a political solution. <a href="https://t.co/GCbBLkgj92">pic.twitter.com/GCbBLkgj92</a></p>— Jeremy Corbyn (@jeremycorbyn) <a href="https://twitter.com/jeremycorbyn/status/937761716540182529?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 4, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Very soon India will say that there's no such thing as Kashmiris, erasing their existence.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">BREAKING: Aid group Doctors Without Borders says at least 6,700 Rohingya were killed between August and September in Myanmar.</p>— The Associated Press (@AP) <a href="https://twitter.com/AP/status/941210427610017792?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 14, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en-gb"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Activists are calling on <a href="https://twitter.com/Unilever?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Unilever</a>, <a href="https://twitter.com/Nestle?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Nestle</a> and others to speak out against <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Rohingya?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Rohingya</a> persecution in Myanmar via the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/WeAreAllRohingyaNow?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#WeAreAllRohingyaNow</a> campaign. <a href="https://t.co/7447A4NbRE">https://t.co/7447A4NbRE</a></p>— Devex (@devex) <a href="https://twitter.com/devex/status/961622725646344192?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">8 February 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/BREAKING?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#BREAKING</a> Around 600,000 Rohingya Muslims remaining in Myanmar face a "serious risk of genocide", UN investigators say <a href="https://t.co/gjqDO2OVxQ">pic.twitter.com/gjqDO2OVxQ</a></p>— AFP news agency (@AFP) <a href="https://twitter.com/AFP/status/1173545076582223872?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 16, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
UN is possibly the most useless organization on planet Earth.

They failed many groups including Rohingya.

Mr. Bean can offer more help than UN.
 
Rohingya crisis: The Gambia accuses Myanmar of genocide at top UN court

The small west African nation of The Gambia has filed a lawsuit at the UN's top court formally accusing Myanmar of genocide against Rohingya Muslims.

It was filed at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), which normally rules on disputes between states.

Last year, the UN issued a damning report into the violence in Myanmar, saying military leaders should go on trial for genocide.

Myanmar's government denies its troops carried out such crimes.

Thousands of Rohingya were killed and more than 700,000 fled to neighbouring Bangladesh during an army crackdown in the Buddhist-majority country in 2017.

The UN's Independent International Fact Finding Mission on Myanmar said in August 2018 that the army's tactics were "grossly disproportionate to actual security threats" and that "military necessity would never justify killing indiscriminately, gang raping women, assaulting children, and burning entire villages."

Myanmar rejected the report. It has consistently said its operations targeted militant or insurgent threats.

Last year prosecutors at the International Criminal Court (ICC) - which would normally investigate allegations of war crimes as opposed to the ICJ - opened a preliminary inquiry into Myanmar's alleged crimes against its Rohingya Muslim minority.

But the fact that Myanmar has not signed up to the ICC complicates the legal case there and no charges have yet been filed.

Why is Gambia making a complaint?

The Gambia filed a lawsuit to the ICJ - sometimes known as the world court - at the Hague on Monday.

The country, which is majority Muslim, also has the support of the 57-member Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) and a team of international lawyers.

Both it and Myanmar are signatories to the 1948 Genocide Convention, committing them to preventing and punishing the crime of genocide.

In its filing, The Gambia asked the court to implement an injunction to make sure Myanmar immediately "stops atrocities and genocide against its own Rohingya people".

Abubacarr M Tambadou, The Gambia's attorney general and minister of justice, has spearheaded the effort. He previously worked at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda investigating the 1994 genocide there.

Mr Tambadou told the BBC last month that he was motivated to act after hearing stories of brutal killings, rape and torture from survivors on a visit to a Rohingya refugee camp in Bangladesh.

Who are the Rohingya?

The Rohingya are a Muslim ethnic minority in Myanmar ho have their own language and culture. They mostly live in Rakhine state, which borders Bangladesh.

Despite living in Myanmar for generations, they are not recognised as citizens or counted in the census. Thy are often painted, including by government officials, as illegal immigrants and interlopers from Bangladesh.

On 25 August 2017, Rohingya militants attacked dozens of police posts, killing several officers. Clearance operations by security forces in response saw entire villages burned, and civilians attacked, raped and killed, UN investigators found.

Hundreds of thousands fled to Bangladesh, joining many Rohingya living in camps who had fled in earlier waves.

Attempts to repatriate Rohingya have so far failed - with refugees citing the lack of accountability for atrocities committed and uncertainty over their fate on their return.

In October the UN warned that there was a "serious risk of genocide recurring" against those still inside the country.

Earlier this year, the BBC found evidence that entire Rohingya villages had been demolished and replaced by secure government facilities.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-50375739
 
Don't think lawsuit would do anything. It is symbolic only.

UN is probably the most useless organization in the world.
 
Myanmar Rohingya: World court orders prevention of genocide

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has ordered measures to prevent the genocide of Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar (formerly Burma).

The decision comes despite de facto leader Aung San Suu Kyi defending her country against the accusations in person last month.

Thousands of Rohingya died and more than 700,000 fled to Bangladesh during an army crackdown in 2017.

UN investigators have warned that genocidal actions could recur.

The ICJ case, lodged by the African Muslim-majority nation of The Gambia, called for emergency measures to be taken against the Myanmar military until a fuller investigation could be launched.

The Lady who fell from grace
Myanmar, a predominantly Buddhist state, has always insisted that its military campaign was waged to tackle an extremist threat in Rakhine state.

In her defence statement at the court in The Hague, Ms Suu Kyi described the violence as an "internal armed conflict" triggered by Rohingya militant attacks on government security posts.

What did the court say?
The panel of 17 judges at the ICJ on Thursday voted unanimously to order Myanmar to take "all measures within its power" to prevent genocide, which they said the Rohingya remained at serious risk of.

These include the prevention of killing, and "causing serious bodily or mental harm" to members of the group, as well as preserving evidence of possible genocide that has already occurred.

What awaits refugees who return?
Presiding judge Abdulqawi Ahmed Yusuf said Myanmar should report back within four months on how it was implementing the ruling.

The measures are binding and not subject to appeal, but the court has no means of enforcing them.

What now for Aung San Suu Kyi?
By Nick Beake, Myanmar correspondent, BBC News

This judgment has surely obliterated any remnants of Aung San Suu Kyi's international reputation.

Remember, she didn't have to go to The Hague and become the embodiment of Myanmar's defence. She chose to argue, in person, there was no mass murder, rape or arson.

Even her biggest critics used to acknowledge she doesn't control the still powerful Burmese army, but now she has destroyed the firewall between her and the generals by trying - and failing - to justify their actions.

So far, Myanmar has played by the rules of the International Court of Justice. But will it abide by these emergency measures?

Writing today in a British newspaper, Aung San Suu Kyi questioned whether the international justice system was capable of ignoring "unsubstantiated narratives" told by human rights groups and UN investigators against her country.

So, after initially engaging with the UN's top court, will a defeated Aung San Suu Kyi retreat now into isolation?

What is Myanmar's position?
During hearings at the court in December, Ms Suu Kyi asked the ICJ to drop the case, describing it as "incomplete and incorrect".

And in an article for the Financial Times published shortly before the court's judgement she said human rights groups had condemned Myanmar based on "unproven statements without the due process of criminal investigation".

"The international condemnation has had a negative effect on Myanmar's endeavours to bring stability and progress to Rakhine," she said.

"It has undermined painstaking domestic efforts to establish co-operation between the military and the civilian government."

Her remarks also appeared to echo a statement by a government-appointed panel earlier this week which accepted that war crimes may have been committed by individuals but said there was no indication of an intent to commit genocide.

However, the BBC's Anna Holligan, who is in The Hague, says that by coming to the court in December, Ms Suu Kyi had in effect recognised its legitimacy and it will now be difficult for Myanmar to ignore its judgement.

What is the background to the case?
The Rohingya, who numbered around one million in Myanmar at the start of 2017, are one of the many ethnic minorities in the country. Rohingya Muslims are the largest community of Muslims in Myanmar, with the majority living in Rakhine state.

But Myanmar's government denies them citizenship, refusing to recognise them as a people and seeing them as illegal immigrants from Bangladesh.

Waves of Rohingya refugees have fled Myanmar for Bangladesh over the decades but their latest exodus began on 25 August 2017 after militants from a Rohingya insurgent group called Arsa launched deadly attacks on more than 30 police posts.

Rohingyas arriving in Bangladesh said they fled after troops, backed by local Buddhist mobs, responded by burning their villages and attacking and killing civilians.

The government claims that "clearance operations" against the militants ended on 5 September 2017, but analysis of satellite imagery by Human Rights Watch suggests hundreds of villages were destroyed after August that year.

With more than half a million Rohingya believed to still be living in Rakhine, UN investigators have warned there is a "serious risk that genocidal actions may occur or recur".

The state is the scene of an ongoing conflict between the army and rebels from the Buddhist-majority Rakhine ethnic group.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-51221029
 
Was listening to a BBC radio program - the lawyer representing Gambia was saying that the Rohingya's in camps were shouting Gambia Gambia!

Well done to this little African nation to bring shame to others.
 
Was listening to a BBC radio program - the lawyer representing Gambia was saying that the Rohingya's in camps were shouting Gambia Gambia!

Well done to this little African nation to bring shame to others.

Mrs Robert and I visited. Lovely people but so very poor. Peanuts and tourism is all they have. Just getting over a crisis when the previous President would not leave power. ECOWAS threatened to invade and depose him and he fled the country taking much public money.
 
Pakistan should teach Burma a lesson. Instead you guys are selling helicopters to their army.

I totally agree, Pak shoudnt be selling aircraft to this brutal regime and should help them in any way possible including military or supporting those who are fighting back. The same goes for Kashmiris.
 
Will that work? Surely the poorest will suffer, not the oppressors. At some point NATO will have to pile in.

Why would NATO pile in on behalf of Myanamar? Don't you think they would have done so already if they ever had intention of doing so?
 
Din Mohammad is doing everything possible in his power to keep his family and fellow Rohingya refugees healthy during a three-week lockdown enforced by the Indian government to fight the coronavirus.

For the past week, Mohammad, 59, who lives with his wife and five children in Madanpur Khadar refugee camp in the capital, New Delhi, makes rounds of shanties to ensure people are maintaining social distancing and keeping their huts made from wood and plastic sheets clean.

But he knows these measures are hard to implement in crowded refugee camps like theirs, where people live in cramped conditions lacking basic facilities like toilets and clean water.

"We are literally sitting on a powder keg," Mohammad told Al Jazeera. "It won't take long before it explodes."

Nearly 40,000 Rohingya Muslim refugees living in various refugee camps across the country fear that a humanitarian catastrophe looms large over them, as they have been left to fight the coronavirus pandemic alone.

Last Tuesday, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced the strict lockdown for India's 1.3 billon people to prevent the spread of the virus that has killed more than 30,000 worldwide.

But the move has turned into a human tragedy, with tens of thousands of migrant workers fleeing cities, many of them forced to walk hundreds of kilometres to reach their homes, following the shutdown of businesses and factories.

Critics have accused the government of rushing with the lockdown without a proper plan. The South Asian nation has recorded 1,000 COVID-19 cases and 32 deaths so far.

About 100km (62 miles) south of the capital, nearly 400 Rohingya families live in a refugee camp in Ward No 7 of Haryana's Nuh district. For them, having soap is a luxury, let alone buying facemasks and sanitisers.

Everyone is concerned about the virus but there is little they can do to protect themselves. Makeshift shanties that lean on each other make it impossible for people to maintain a distance. The overall sanitation is poor, with toilets unclean and access to healthcare, scarce.

Jaffar Ullah, a computer teacher, lives in one of the shanties. The 29-year-old finished his last bar of soap on Saturday. He does not have anything left to wash his hands with.

"Only a few families have soaps in our slum, while most of them can't afford to buy one," he told Al Jazeera.

The local municipal workers sprayed disinfectants in nearby residential areas - but not in the slums. Over the past few days, Ullah says, there has been a steady rise in cases of fever among the refugees.

"I don't know whether it is related to coronavirus or not, but people are afraid and in fear," Ullah told Al Jazeera. "They can't go to hospitals because the regular OPDs (outpatient departments) are closed due to lockdown. No one from the administration has come to check on us."

Most hospitals suspended their outpatient services following the announcement of the lockdown on March 24.

Last Thursday, Rohingya Human Rights Initiative (ROHRInga), a non-profit organisation based in New Delhi, conducted a door-to-door survey of 334 people living in the Madanpur Khadar camp and found 37 of them suffering from symptoms including fever, cough and runny nose - similar to those of the new virus.

"There is a serious risk of coronavirus outbreak in Rohingya refugee slums," Sabber Kyaw Min from ROHRIinga told Al Jazeera.

"The Indian government is protecting its people while international organisations such as UNHCR (the United Nations refugee agency) have turned a blind eye towards us. We are literally left alone to fight this pandemic," he added.

Meanwhile, the UNHCR office in New Delhi denied delaying its response and said it has been closely monitoring the situation in coordination with local non-profit organisations.

"We are very much on it. We did organise various COVID-19-related awareness programmes in slums over the last few weeks," Kiri Atri, the assistant external relations officer, UNHCR, told Al Jazeera.

"From today onwards, we will start distributing hygiene kits containing soaps, while facemasks will be given on a case-by-case basis."

Badar Alam from Nuh refugee camp worked at a construction site as a daily wage earner, but he has not been able to work due to the lockdown. The 31-year-old says his family, including his wife and three children, have not had a proper meal in a week.

Alam is left with two kilos of rice, 250 grams of lentils and 250 rupees ($3) in his pocket, with no prospect of work for at least another two weeks. "What am I going to feed my children? Stones?" he asked.

Nearly 1,200 Rohingya families living in the Jammu district of the disputed Kashmir region, who rely on walnut factories for work, are also running short on grains. Refugees say that it is a matter of days before they will have to sleep with empty stomachs.

Hafiz Mubashar runs an Islamic seminary with boarding facilities for Rohingya children in the Bathindi locality of Jammu city. He shut down classes a week ago. But for the past three days he has been receiving calls from students seeking his help in arranging rice and flour.

"The lockdown has exacerbated our food woes," Mubashar, 27, told Al Jazeera.

"Many of us are already starving, while others have shifted to eating one meal a day or resorted to cutting down their food intake."

Mubashar believes that the next seven days will be critical for the Rohingya community, as most of the families will soon run out of their remaining grains.

"We are struggling with both hunger and coronavirus at the same time," Mubashar said.

"But I think hunger will kill us before the virus does."

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/03/kill-coronavirus-rohingya-india-200331035538875.html
 
Myanmar has submitted its first report to the International Court of Justice (ICJ), detailing what it has done to protect the minority Rohingya from genocide.

The Hague-based court issued a provisional order in January, asking Myanmar to safeguard the mostly Muslim group in western Rakhine state as part of "provisional measures" at the start of a trial expected to take years.

The top UN court agreed last year to consider a case brought by The Gambia alleging that Myanmar committed genocide against the Rohingya, an accusation vigorously denied by the government.

Myanmar's military in August 2017 launched what it called a "clearance operation" in Rakhine state in response to an attack by a Rohingya armed group. The crackdown forced more than 730,000 Rohingya to flee to neighboring Bangladesh and led to widespread accusations that security forces committed mass murder, gang rape, torture and arson.

A foreign ministry official told Turkey's Anadolu news agency the report submitted on Saturday was based on three directives issued by President Win Myint's office in April.

It is unclear if the court will make the report public.

Speaking on condition of anonymity as he was not authorised to speak to the media, the official said the president ordered the regional government and military not to remove or destroy evidence of a genocide.

He also instructed them to prevent genocidal acts as well as incitement and hate speech against the Rohingya.

"What I know is that the report was based on what we have done and what we are doing regarding these three directives," said the official.

'Milestone'

David Scheffer, US ambassador-at-large for war crimes, said before Myanmar filed the report that it was "an important milestone".

"The world should learn whether Myanmar not only is complying with an international order, but whether it has done so truthfully and without deception or obfuscation," he said.

Scheffer made the remarks in a foreword to a report titled No Place for Optimism: Anticipating Myanmar's First Report to the International Court of Justice.

Rohingya groups say Myanmar has ignored the ICJ's orders and the military is still committing atrocities in Rakhine state, where it is fighting ethnic Rakhine rebels.

"Myanmar has not taken any serious action to protect the Rohingya," said Muhammed Nowkhim, a Rohingya activist based in Bangladesh who fled the 2017 violence.

Nowkhim told DPA news agency that refugee groups in Bangladesh have documented dozens of cases of Rohingya being killed or injured in Rakhine since the ICJ order, often by military shelling.

Stella Naw, a Myanmar-based human rights activist, said the government's directives were disingenuous and aimed at shifting responsibility away from the military.

"They're always playing the same old game," she told DPA.

Most persecuted

The Rohingya, described by the United Nations as the world's most persecuted people, have faced heightened fears of attack since dozens were killed in communal violence in 2012.

According to Amnesty International, more than 750,000 Rohingya refugees, mostly women and children, fled Myanmar and crossed into Bangladesh after Myanmar forces launched a crackdown on the community in August 2017.

Since then, nearly 24,000 Rohingya have been killed by Myanmar's state forces, according to a report by the Ontario International Development Agency (OIDA).

More than 34,000 Rohingya were also thrown into fires, while more than 114,000 others were beaten, said the OIDA report, titled Forced Migration of Rohingya: The Untold Experience.

As many as 18,000 Rohingya women and girls were raped by Myanmar's army and police and more than 115,000 Rohingya homes burned down while 113,000 others were vandalised, it added.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020...eport-rohingya-top-court-200524053637929.html
 
Nobody knows how many people have died. It could be 50 or even more," recalls Khadiza Begum.

The 50-year-old was among 396 Rohingya Muslims who had tried to reach Malaysia but who finally returned to the Bangladeshi shore after the boat carrying them was stranded at sea for two months.

Her estimate on the number of deaths comes from the funerals her son officiated as an imam, a Muslim preacher, on the same boat.

The human smugglers never delivered them to their longed-for destination.

Khadiza had to run away from her home in Myanmar because of violence that UN investigators described as a "textbook example of ethnic cleansing".

Neighbouring Bangladesh gave her shelter, settling the fleeing Rohingya Muslims in what has now become the world's largest refugee camp.

Around one million Rohingya are housed in Cox's Bazar in Bangladesh, and some among them, like Khadiza, hold dreams of a better life in Malaysia, lying across the Bay of Bengal.

But in Khadiza's case, the dream turned into a nightmare.

She recounts how the crew - the human traffickers - tried to conceal deaths on their crowded boat.

"They would run both engines so that none could hear the sound of splashing water when bodies were thrown out."

Often, she says, the bodies were disposed of during the night: "I know for sure at least 14 to 15 women died."

The death of a woman who was sitting next to her continues to traumatise Khadiza. Severely dehydrated, the woman was initially disoriented and behaving strangely. The crew took her to the upper deck of the boat, where Khadiza says she died.

"I am still haunted by her death. She died in front of our eyes."

The woman had four children with her. "My son informed the eldest daughter, just 16 years old, that her mother had died."

"The woman's three other children didn't know what happened to their mother." she says. "They were crying. It was heart-breaking.

"The body was immediately thrown out."

Khadiza is a mother of four, too. She was made homeless and stateless in 2017 after her husband and one of her sons were killed during army operations in the Rakhine state of Myanmar.

Her village was torched, forcing her to go to Bangladesh to settle in the Cox's Bazar refugee camp with her children.

After marrying off her eldest daughter, she craved to provide a better life for her remaining son and daughter. "We had a tough life. I didn't see any future for us in a refugee camp."

Stories she heard about the Rohingya who crossed the sea to Malaysia for a better life fascinated her. Khadiza sold her jewels and put together $750 (£610) to pay to traffickers who would arrange a boat for them.

Then one night in February, she received the phone call she had been waiting for.

She kept her intentions secret and bundled some clothes and gold jewels in a small bag. "I told my friends and neighbours that I would be going away for medical treatment," she tells the BBC.

With her son and daughter in tow, Khadiza locked their home and slipped away in darkness.

A man met them near a bus stand, guiding them to a farm house where she saw hundreds of others.

The group was taken to a boat that slowly set sail in the Bay of Bengal, between the Saint Martin's Island in Bangladesh and Sittwe in Myanmar.

"I had been planning for months. I wanted a better life. I was dreaming of a new life in a new country," she says.

After two days they were transferred into a another boat: a bigger one, full of people.

Khadiza says she didn't even have room to stretch her legs: "There were families with women and children. I think there were more than 500 people."

The boat was larger than a typical trawler used in South Asia, but certainly not big enough to carry so many people.

Crew members stayed on the upper deck, women were given the middle deck and men were pushed to the bottom. Ironically, the crew were Burmese men from Myanmar - the country from where the Rohingya were forced out.

"At the beginning I was scared," Khadiza remembers. "I didn't know what our destiny would be, but as we settled in, I started dreaming again.

"I thought we would achieve a better life. So whatever troubles we were going through did not matter."

The boat lacked basic facilities like water and sanitation. Khadiza washed herself only twice in two months by drawing water from the sea, in front of others.

Toilets consisted of two wooden planks with a hole in the middle.

"A few days after we started our journey to Malaysia, a boy fell through the hole into the sea," Khadiza remembers. "He fell and died."

It was the first of many deaths she witnessed.

After sailing for seven days, sometimes in bad weather, the group finally spotted the Malaysian coast. Here, there were expecting smaller boats to transport them to the land.

But none arrived.

The coronavirus outbreak had tightened Malaysian security: with coast guards conducting more frequent patrols, making it difficult to sneak in the country.

The captain told the refugees they would not be able to land in Malaysia. Khadiza's hopes had been shattered by the pandemic.

The crew had to retreat, but faced a shortage of food and water.

On their way to Malaysia the refugees had been given rice twice a day, sometimes with lentils, and a mug of water.

"At first, it became one meal every day. Then one meal every two days - just plain rice with nothing else," Khadiza recalls.

The lack of drinking water was becoming unbearable.

Khadiza says that, in desperation, some of the refugees even drank seawater: "People would try to quench their thirst by soaking clothes in water, then wringing it get the drops in their mouths."

Days later, off the coast of Thailand, a small boat arranged by the human traffickers brought in much needed supplies.

But, while they were waiting for another chance to get to Malaysia, the Burmese navy intercepted them.

"They arrested the captain and three crew members, but they were released," Khadiza says. "I guess they made some sort of a deal."

Their second and last attempt to land in Malaysia was also to end in failure. It became clear to everyone on the boat that they were going nowhere.

"We were drifting around in the sea, with no hope of ever reaching the shore. People were getting desperate. We kept asking ourselves how long we could survive like this."

So, a group of refugees went up to the crew and pleaded with them to disembark anywhere, regardless of whether it was Myanmar or Bangladesh.

But the crew refused, believing it too risky. They could be arrested and their boat taken away.

As the boat drifted aimlessly in Bay of Bengal, stories accusing the crew of rape and torture started circulating.

"Things were getting out of control," Khadiza says. "I heard one of the crew members was attacked and killed - his body dumped in the sea."

There were 10 Burmese crew members overseeing almost 400 refugees. "They realised it would be very difficult for them to fight and win," she says.

The crew demanded more money to hire small boats which would take them ashore. Those on board coughed up another $1,200.

After a few days, a small boat approached them. Immediately, the captain and most of the crew members jumped in to run away.

Those remaining managed to steer the boat towards Bangladesh, with the help of two remaining crew members.

"I was so happy when I finally saw the coast for the first time in two months." Khadiza remembers.

They were back in Bangladesh again. After seeing the people in such a bad condition, local villagers informed the Bangladeshi Coast Guard.

After spending two weeks in quarantine, Khadiza returned to her refugee camp, only to find out that her place was now occupied by another family.

She has no hope of going back to Myanmar to live again on the land she farmed.

She now has to share a tiny space with her son and daughter.

"I lost everything for my dream," she says, in quiet contemplation. "Never make the mistake I made."

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-52832841
 
People traffickers holding hundreds of Rohingya refugees at sea are demanding payments from their families to release them from boats off the shores of Southeast Asia, relatives and rights groups say.

Several hundred Rohingya, members of a largely Muslim minority from Myanmar fleeing persecution at home and refugee camps in Bangladesh, have been stranded for months after countries sealed their borders to block the spread of the coronavirus.

Three people who said their relatives were at sea told the Reuters news agency that traffickers had demanded money to release them from boats that have been off Southeast Asia since February, trying to find a place to land.

"Before, the deal was that if they were able to reach the Malaysian shore then they will take the money, but they're asking for it now," said Mohammed Ayas, who said his 16-year-old brother left a refugee camp in Bangladesh in February.

Since then, the family has heard nothing from him, Ayas said.

Musha, whose two sisters are also at sea after leaving camps in Bangladesh in February, said brokers acting for the traffickers asked the family to pay 12,000 ringgit ($2,800) via a mobile banking service for their transfer to Malaysia.

He said the family paid the sum but did not know the fate of the two teenaged girls.

For years, Rohingya have boarded boats between November and April, when the seas are calm, to get to Southeast Asian countries including Malaysia, Thailand and Indonesia. But coronavirus lockdowns have left boats stranded at sea.

Dozens of people died on board a boat that had to return to Bangladesh in April after running out of food and water, survivors told Reuters.

Authorities in Malaysia detained 269 Rohingya who came ashore from a damaged boat last week. Human Rights Watch said about 70 percent of them were too weak to walk.

'Offshore traffickers' camp'
At least one vessel remains at sea with as many as 300 people on board, some of whom are believed to be sick, according to rights groups. Its location is not known.

"This boat has been turned into an offshore traffickers' camp," said Chris Lewa, director of the Arakan Project, a group focusing on the Rohingya crisis. She described the people at sea as hostages and said the latest demands were for 5,000 Malaysian ringgit ($1,170) per passenger to get to Malaysia.

An official with the Thai marine police said the vessel was not in Thai waters but had sought provisions from fishing boats. A second Thai police official, who also asked not to be named, said three boats carrying hundreds of Rohingya were close to Koh Adang, a Thai island, but on the Malaysian side of the border.

Malaysian officials, including the country's maritime enforcement agency, did not respond to requests for comment. The agency said it turned away a boat carrying about 300 Rohingya last week, media reported.

During a crackdown on trafficking networks that led to a similar crisis in 2015, gangs cast passengers adrift with meagre food and water. Many died at sea.

More than 730,000 Rohingya fled from Myanmar's Rakhine state in 2017 following a military crackdown the United Nations has said was carried out with "genocidal intent". Myanmar denies genocide, saying it was responding to attacks on security posts by Rohingya fighters.

Nearly a million Rohingya now live in camps in southeast Bangladesh.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020...ngya-stranded-sea-months-200616042728437.html
 
These traffickers are scums. They are playing with these vulnerable Rohingya refugees.
 
Why hasn't Pakistan taken any of them in -yes i understand were not the richest -but however we cant say Bangladesh /Malaysia should be the only ones taking them in and them blame them when they reject them.

We all know the Arabs countries wont even take 1 in - so please no one ask that question
 
Why hasn't Pakistan taken any of them in -yes i understand were not the richest -but however we cant say Bangladesh /Malaysia should be the only ones taking them in and them blame them when they reject them.

We all know the Arabs countries wont even take 1 in - so please no one ask that question

Surprisingly there a lot of Rohyinga in Saudi. They are sort off the books people. I met some them on Hajj last year
 
MSF says Malaysia plan for Rohingya return 'concerning'

Medicins sans Frontiers (MSF) says reports Malaysia plans to send some 269 Rohingya people back to sea on the boat they arrived on was "concerning".

Beatrice Lau, who is the organisation's head of mission in Malaysia, says returning the Rohingya was a violation of the customary international law principle of non-refoulement, and could lead to many more deaths.

"MSF calls on the Malaysian government to reconsider its plans to deport people who are so clearly in need of protection and safety," she said in a statement.

Malaysia, which has stepped up border patrols because of the coronavirus, detained the Rohingya on June 8 after their boat was discovered off the resort island of Langkawi. Lau noted that the Rohingya no longer posed a COVID-19 risk as they had already been quarantined and tested. MSF was willing to provide medical assistance, she added.
 
'We cannot overstate the shame': ASEAN MPs on boat pushbacks

A group of MPs from Southeast Asia are calling on leaders of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) to do more to help refugees and migrants, particularly Rohingya, taking boats across the Indian Ocean.

The open letter signed by Charles Santiago, chairman of ASEAN Parliamentarians for Human Rights (APHR), urged ASEAN leaders to respect vulnerable communities and curb hateful rhetoric directed at refugees and migrants during the coronavirus epidemic.

Malaysia detained 269 Rohingya on a damaged boat earlier this month, and media reported this week that a boat carrying 300 people had been turned away. APHR said ASEAN countries needed to work with Myanmar to end the Rohingya crisis and "organise urgent collective search and rescue operations for boats carrying Rohingya refugees and to organise for their proper disembarkation.

"We cannot overstate the shame that falls upon us collectively when our governments choose to push people back to die at sea."
 
Human Rights Watch has called on Bangladesh to move more than 300 Rohingya refugees, including children, to the camps in Cox's Bazaar district, more than two months after they were quarantined on a small flood-prone island in the Bay of Bengal.

The Rohingya were rescued by the Bangladesh navy in early May after being stranded at sea for weeks, and sent to Bhashan Char island - a silty strip of land off the southern coast that is vulnerable to monsoon storms.

Bangladesh has said the 308 refugees were sent to the island rather than the camps in Cox's Bazar because authorities were afraid they might have the highly infectious disease COVID-19.

"Bangladesh authorities are using the pandemic as an excuse to detain refugees on a spit of land in the middle of a churning monsoon sea while their families anxiously pray for their return," Brad Adams, Asia director of HRW, said in a statement on Thursday.

"The government is inexplicably delaying aid workers' access to support the refugees with immediate care, and refusing to reunite them with their families in the Cox's Bazar camps."

According to the US-based rights group, the quarantined refugees do not have adequate access to food, clean drinking water or medical care. Some have also alleged being beaten up and mistreated by the authorities, it said.

Bangladesh last year constructed facilities for 100,000 people on Bhashan Char, a muddy silt islet in the cyclone-prone coastal belt, saying they needed to take the pressure off crowded border camps that are home to almost one million Rohingya.

But the United Nations, rights activists and aid agencies have repeatedly raised concerns about the safety of those quarantined there and urged for relocation.

According to Bangladesh officials, the outbreak among Rohingya refugees has been "successfully contained" amid fears that the disease spread rapidly in overcrowded camps.

Some 724 Rohingya have been tested in the Bangladesh camps, with 54 found positive and five died since the first cases were detected in May, officials said.

Rohingya live in sprawling refugee camps in southern Bangladesh, most having arrived from Myanmar in late 2017 after fleeing a military crackdown that the UN said was conducted with genocidal intent.

The Myanmar army denies "genocide" and says it was carrying out a legitimate campaign against armed rebels who attacked police posts.

In January, the Hague-based International Court of Justice ordered Myanmar to take emergency measures to prevent the genocide of the Rohingya, who face widespread discrimination and have been stripped of their nationality.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020...and-hrw-urges-bangladesh-200709075548649.html
 
Human Rights Watch has called on Bangladesh to move more than 300 Rohingya refugees, including children, to the camps in Cox's Bazaar district, more than two months after they were quarantined on a small flood-prone island in the Bay of Bengal.

The Rohingya were rescued by the Bangladesh navy in early May after being stranded at sea for weeks, and sent to Bhashan Char island - a silty strip of land off the southern coast that is vulnerable to monsoon storms.

Bangladesh has said the 308 refugees were sent to the island rather than the camps in Cox's Bazar because authorities were afraid they might have the highly infectious disease COVID-19.

"Bangladesh authorities are using the pandemic as an excuse to detain refugees on a spit of land in the middle of a churning monsoon sea while their families anxiously pray for their return," Brad Adams, Asia director of HRW, said in a statement on Thursday.

"The government is inexplicably delaying aid workers' access to support the refugees with immediate care, and refusing to reunite them with their families in the Cox's Bazar camps."

According to the US-based rights group, the quarantined refugees do not have adequate access to food, clean drinking water or medical care. Some have also alleged being beaten up and mistreated by the authorities, it said.

Bangladesh last year constructed facilities for 100,000 people on Bhashan Char, a muddy silt islet in the cyclone-prone coastal belt, saying they needed to take the pressure off crowded border camps that are home to almost one million Rohingya.

But the United Nations, rights activists and aid agencies have repeatedly raised concerns about the safety of those quarantined there and urged for relocation.

According to Bangladesh officials, the outbreak among Rohingya refugees has been "successfully contained" amid fears that the disease spread rapidly in overcrowded camps.

Some 724 Rohingya have been tested in the Bangladesh camps, with 54 found positive and five died since the first cases were detected in May, officials said.

Rohingya live in sprawling refugee camps in southern Bangladesh, most having arrived from Myanmar in late 2017 after fleeing a military crackdown that the UN said was conducted with genocidal intent.

The Myanmar army denies "genocide" and says it was carrying out a legitimate campaign against armed rebels who attacked police posts.

In January, the Hague-based International Court of Justice ordered Myanmar to take emergency measures to prevent the genocide of the Rohingya, who face widespread discrimination and have been stripped of their nationality.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020...and-hrw-urges-bangladesh-200709075548649.html

A friend of mine took a mercy mission to BD for the Rohingya. After a visit to the camps he was full of praise for the local BD people- he said they were poor but their hearts were as big as the ocean, he was full praise for the Turkish Govt( Erdogen doesnt just talk the talk, he walks the walk) and the bravery and resilience of the Rohingya people. He heard some horrific stories with murder and rape a common theme, and he recounted a story, which made me cry- an old lady asked him when the Muslim armies will come and defend them from their tormentors- the Burmese govt, he said he cried, and told her, they arent coming.
 
Was listening to a BBC radio program - the lawyer representing Gambia was saying that the Rohingya's in camps were shouting Gambia Gambia!

Well done to this little African nation to bring shame to others.

True. Real lion-hearted stuff from little Gambia.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Group of 27 Rohingya refugees due to be whipped in Malaysia have been spared after a judge overturned the punishment <a href="https://t.co/486IPWfdnw">https://t.co/486IPWfdnw</a></p>— SkyNews (@SkyNews) <a href="https://twitter.com/SkyNews/status/1285981211635126272?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 22, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Dozens of Rohingya migrants feared drowned off Malaysia coast

A Rohingya migrant is feared to be the only survivor from a boat carrying at least two dozen asylum seekers that is believed to have run into difficulty off the Malaysian coast near Thailand, a coastguard official said on Sunday.

Mohamad Zawawi Abdullah, coastguard chief for the northern states of Kedah and Perlis, said the 27-year-old named Nor Hossain was detained by police after he swam to shore on the resort island of Langkawi.

"Based on the information from the police, the illegal Rohingya migrant had jumped off the boat that had 24 other people and that he was the only one who managed to swim to the shore safely," Zawawi said.

A search and rescue operation had been launched, but another official told AFP news agency that no bodies or survivors had been found. It was not clear what happened to the boat.

Muslim-majority Malaysia is a favoured destination for Rohingya, who face persecution in their mostly Buddhist homeland of Myanmar.

But the Malaysian authorities have in recent months been trying to stop them entering over coronavirus fears.

Many of the 700,000-plus Rohingya who fled a military crackdown in Myanmar three years ago have attempted to leave overcrowded refugee camps in Bangladesh's Cox's Bazar district on boats headed for Malaysia and neighbouring Indonesia.

Zawawi said two coastguard aircraft and two boats have been deployed to search the suspected area.

Malaysia has stepped up maritime patrols since the outbreak of the coronavirus epidemic in a bid to stop Rohingya boats from landing.

Although some have made it ashore, many boats have been turned back, sparking anger from rights groups.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020...d-drowned-malaysia-coast-200726090832598.html
 
On Tuesday, about a million Rohingya refugees stuck in Bangladesh marked three years since escaping from Myanmar, with the coronavirus pandemic forcing them to hold a day-long "silent protest" inside their flimsy bamboo shacks.

An August 2017 military operation - that has triggered genocide charges at the United Nations's top court - drove 750,000 Rohingya out of Myanmar's Rakhine state into neighbouring Bangladesh, to join 200,000 who fled earlier.

Three years later and with no work or decent education for their children, there is little prospect of a return to the country where members of the Muslim-majority Rohingya have long been treated as inferior intruders.

Myanmar's military "killed more than 10,000 of our people. They carried out mass murders and rapes and drove our people from their home", Mohib Ullah, a Rohingya leader in the camps, told AFP.

For the second anniversary last year, Ullah led a rally of about 200,000 protesters at Kutupalong, the largest of the network of camps in southeast Bangladesh, where 600,000 people live in cramped and unsanitary conditions.

But the Bangladeshi authorities, increasingly impatient with the Rohingya, and who a year ago cut internet access in the camps, have banned gatherings because of the coronavirus pandemic.

The sprawling camps have been cut off from the rest of Bangladesh, with the military erecting barbed-wire fences around the perimeters. Inside, movement has been restricted.

Fears the deadly virus could spread like wildfire - because physical distancing is almost impossible - have not been borne out, with just 84 coronavirus infections and six related deaths confirmed.

The Rohingya will mark "Genocide Remembrance Day" with silence and prayers in their rickety homes all day, Ullah said.

"There will be no rallies, no work, no prayers at mosques, no NGO or aid activities, no schools, no madrasas and no food distribution," he added.

'Apartheid'
Bangladesh has signed an agreement with Myanmar to return the refugees. But the Rohingya refuse to go without guarantees for their safety and proper rights.

About 600,000 Rohingya remain in Myanmar, but most are not regarded as citizens, living in what Amnesty International describes as "apartheid" conditions.

The Rohingya are not convinced of the "sincerity of the Myanmar authorities", Bangladesh foreign secretary Masud bin Momen said.

Khin Maung, a 25-year-old Rohingya activist who lost 10 relatives in the horrors of 2017, said the mood in the camps was very depressed.

"We want justice for the murders. We also want to go back home. But I don't see any immediate hopes. It may take years," Maung, who leads a Rohingya youth group, said.

He said the desperation had led hundreds to flee the camps this year on rickety boats often arranged by unscrupulous trafficking gangs.

At least 24 refugees are believed to have drowned off the coast of Malaysia last month in the latest in a string of tragedies. The lone survivor managed to swim to shore.

"Myanmar needs to accept an international solution that provides for the safe, voluntary return of Rohingya refugees, while an understandably stretched Bangladesh should not make conditions inhospitable for refugees who have nowhere to go," said Brad Adams from Human Rights Watch.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020...pped-camps-await-justice-200825042440402.html
 
Rohingya: “We would rather die now than be kept here forever”

The Rohingya are as far from home today as they were three years ago today when they were violently expelled from their homeland.
Exactly three years ago today, Myanmar soldiers, accompanied by local Buddhist militias, launched a wave of attacks on Rohingya villages in the northwest corner of the southeast Asian country. More than a million Rohingya genocide survivors, most fled in the 2017 violence, find themselves dislocated in what has become a never-ending road to justice for the world’s most persecuted religious minority.

On the morning of 25 August 2017, tens of thousands Rohingya awoke to the sound of gunfire and mortar rounds aimed at their villages and homes. The wave of violence, including mass killings, gang rapes, looting and property destruction, that would continue for three bloody months.

By the start of December, more than 20,000 Rohingya were dead, alongside thousands more injured and permanently traumatised, according to estimates made by Doctor Without Borders. One study documented 18,000 incidences of rape, 35,000 being thrown into a fire, and 42,000 gunshot wounds.

An international collaborative research effort, which included interviews with 3,300 Rohingya households living in refugee camps alongside the Myanmar-Bangladesh border, reveals the full scale of atrocities carried out against the Rohingya in the final months of 2017: 97 percent witnessed their neighbours injured by Myanmar authorities; 82 percent witnessed their neighbour’s death or saw dead bodies in Myanmar before fleeing; 59 percent witnessed neighbours being raped by Myanmar authorities; 85 percent witnessed the burning of their own home.

Today, nearly one million Rohingya remain trapped in squalid refugee camps on the Myanmar-Bangladesh border, with a further 200,000 trapped in Rakhine State, or what a Rohingya village leader in Myanmar described to me as a “genocide zone,” cornered by Myanmar soldiers on one side and Arakan separatist fighters on the other, with thousands of landmines in between.

Rohingya refugees will not return until they are guaranteed security, citizenship, reparations, and an end to discriminatory policies, with the perpetrators of the genocide, brought to justice.

With those justifiable and understandable stipulations in mind, the past three years has brought the Rohingya frustration and false hope. Multilateral and bilateral “repatriation deals” have come and gone, mostly because no one put in place measures or mechanisms that guaranteed the safety and wellbeing of returning Rohingya.

Hope arrived in the form of a historic ruling on 23 January, however, when the International Court of Justice ordered the Myanmar government to halt and put in place measures that will prevent further genocide.

Tim Khin, president of the Burmese Rohingya Organization UK, described the ICJ’s landmark ruling as a “crucial moment for Rohingya justice, and vindication for those of us who have lived through this genocide for decades.”

“The court’s decision clearly shows that it takes the allegations of genocide seriously and that Myanmar’s hollow attempts to deny these have fallen on deaf ears.”

A full seven months have now passed but there’s been no discernible improvement in the day to day lives of the Rohingya, who remain largely where they have been since December 2017, with Nay San Lwin, the co-founder of Free Rohingya Coalition, arguing that the situation for the Rohingya trapped in Rakhine State has deteriorated.

“Killings, tortures, and hate speech against them continues,” Lwin told The Daily Star.

When I spoke with Mohammed Salam, chairman of a local Rohingya welfare committee in Rakhine State last year, he described to me how a Myanmar military “gunship” attacked a village in the township of Buthidaung, saying, “A half dozen were killed, and the injured were taken to the hospital in Buthidaung, which is running out of medicines and anaesthesia.”

The Myanmar government has also recently imposed new restrictions on humanitarian aid, internet access, and movement, leaving thousands of Rohingya with limited access to food and medical supplies, which is further indicative of “intent to destroy the group in whole or in part,” says Param-Preet Singh, the associate director for International Justice Programme at Human Rights Watch.

Rohingya refugees continue to suffer in other parts of the world where they had found shelter from marauding Myanmar military personnel, as far as Saudi Arabia, where 20-year-old Faisal Thar Thakin reached by way of forged travel documents.

“We would rather die now than be kept here forever or sent to Myanmar or Bangladesh,” he told me last year when he and hundreds of other refugees staged a hunger strike in protest against inhumane conditions at Saudi Arabia’s notorious Shumaisi detention centre.

All this time, the United Nations has remained a passive onlooker, excluding a draft resolution that was put forward by the United Kingdom but blocked by UN Security Council members Russia and China, both of count among Myanmar’s closest allies.

Not even the social media giant Facebook will help bring justice to the Rohingya, even though the company acknowledged its site had been weaponised by Myanmar authorities to incite genocide.

Earlier this month, the company rejected a filing by The Gambia in a US District Court to release “all documents and communications produced, drafter, posted or published on the Facebook page” by Myanmar military officials and security forces, so that it can evaluate what role they played in the mass murder and rape of the country’s Muslim minority, arguing that doing so would constitute “special and unbounded access” to accounts.

Ultimately, the international community’s inaction and stubborn refusal to provide comfort and security to more than one million Rohingya genocide survivors should shame and embarrass us all, particularly so today – Rohingya Genocide Remembrance Day.
 
I really feel sorry for these Rohingya folks. They are stuck.

UN should do more. UN needs to stop being useless and do something productive for once.
 
Myanmar soldiers ‘in Hague after confessing to killing Rohingya’

Two Myanmar soldiers have been taken to The Hague after confessing to murdering Rohingya minority during a 2017 crackdown, two news organisations and a rights group have reported.

The two men admitted to killing dozens of villagers in northern Rakhine state and burying them in mass graves, according to the New York Times, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation and the non-profit Fortify Rights, citing statements the men made on videos filmed in Myanmar this year.

Reuters news agency on Tuesday said it has not seen the videos cited by the news organisations.

The New York Times said it could not independently confirm that the two soldiers committed the crimes to which they confessed.

Myanmar government and military spokesmen did not answer calls seeking comment.

The reports said the men had been in the custody of the Arakan Army group, which is now fighting Myanmar government troops in Rakhine state, when they made the admissions and were later taken to The Hague in the Netherlands, where they could appear as witnesses or face trial.

It was not clear from the reports how the men fell into the hands of the Arakan Army, why they were speaking, or how they were transported to The Hague and under whose authority.

A spokesman for the International Criminal Court (ICC), based in The Hague, said it did not have the men in custody.

“No. These reports are not correct. We don’t have these persons in the ICC custody,” said the spokesman, Fadi el Abdallah.

Payam Akhavan, a Canadian lawyer representing Bangladesh in a filing against Myanmar at the ICC, said the two men had appeared at a border post requesting the protection of the government and had confessed to the mass murder and rape of Rohingya civilians in 2017.

“All I can say is that those two individuals are no longer in Bangladesh,” he said.

A spokesman for the Arakan Army, Khine Thu Kha, said the two men were deserters and were not held as prisoners of war.

He did not comment further on where the men were now but said the group was “committed to justice” for all victims of the Myanmar military.

Myanmar has repeatedly denied allegations of genocide, saying its military operations in 2017 were targeting Rohingya rebels who attacked police border posts.

Speaking from the Hague, Al Jazeera’s Step Vaessen said that the case had been stalled for a long time because Myanmar is not a signatory to the Rome Statute, the basis for ICC. But with Bangladesh being a signatory, the ICC has ruled that is has jurisdiction over the case

“Part of the crimes that happened in Myanmar, were happening in Bangladesh as well. For example, the forced deportations, where hundreds of thousands of ethnic Rohingya were deported to Bangladesh. That’s why the case has been speeding up since last November,” she said.

“The court has ordered the investigation to be continued and if we have these two former military men… if they say they were involved and have given a very detailed account of what they did and who was with them, then this will be an enormous move for this investigation.”

Commenting from Amman, Antonia Mulvey, executive director of Legal Action Worldwide, said that if the evidence turns out to be credible, it would be a huge push for the investigation.

“While the ICC has made no comment on whether or not they have them [the men] in custody, the stories [of the soldiers] are said to be credible and corroborative,” she said explaining that the statements included a mention of ordered killings and rape.

“While they [the soldiers] may be very low in the ranks, we hope more will come forward. There was shown to be a clear chain of command,” she added.

The ICC is investigating the crime against humanity of forced deportation of Rohingya to Bangladesh, as well as persecution and other human rights violations.

“The office does not publicly comment on speculation or reports regarding its ongoing investigations, neither does the office discuss specifics of any aspect of its investigative activities,” a statement from the ICC prosecutor’s office said.

Myanmar is also facing charges of genocide at the International Court of Justice, also in The Hague, though that body does not bring cases against individuals or hear witnesses.

In 2015, before the alleged 2017 genocide, Al Jazeera’s Investigative Unit revealed the inner workings of the Myanmar regime, drawing on documents from the Myanmar military, an unpublished United Nations report and other government paperwork.

Those documents, assessed by Yale University Law School and the International State Crime Initiative at Queen Mary University of London, constituted “strong evidence” of a state-led genocide according to experts.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020...fessing-killing-rohingya-200908121409905.html
 
Approximately 130,000 Rohingya Muslims who remain in refugee camps in Myanmar’s conflict-torn Rakhine state live under “squalid and abusive” conditions, Human Rights Watch (HRW) said on Thursday urging that their “arbitrary and indefinite” detention be ended immediately.

HRW said the mass detention of the mostly Muslim Rohingya in camps was like an “open prison”.

“The Myanmar government has interned 130,000 Rohingya in inhuman conditions for eight years, cut off from their homes, land, and livelihoods, with little hope that things will improve,” said Shayna Bauchner, author of the report.

Before 2017, there were an estimated one million Rohingya in Myanmar. They have lived in the country for generations, but the government considers them migrants from neighbouring Bangladesh and has refused to grant them citizenship or even refer to them as Rohingya.

In 2017, a brutal military crackdown forced some 750,000 Rohingya to flee across the border into Bangladesh in violence that is now the subject of genocide charges against Myanmar at the United Nations’ top court.

Of the more than 250,000 Rohingya left in Myanmar, at least 100,000 have been living in refugee camps having been displaced during an earlier wave of violence in 2012.

Tens of thousands of other Rohingya live in villages spread across Rakhine. But they are fearful of the military, which keeps a constant watch on their communities.

Compounding their problem is a parallel conflict between the military and the Arakan Army, an ethnic Rakhine armed group, which has intensified over the last year and displaced tens of thousands of people in the state

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/10/8/rohingya-report
 
CRICKET SOUTH AFRICA (CSA) today announced the fixtures for the three revised franchise competitions for the 2020/21 season as well as the senior provincial fixtures for both men and women.

As previously announced the franchises will play a T20 competition in addition to the Momentum One-Day Cup and the CSA Four-Day Franchise Series following the decision to postpone the Mzansi Super League.

The franchise season will start in the first week of November while provincial cricket for both men and women will start at the beginning of January.

“We are pleased that no matches have been reduced despite the late start to the season,” commented CSA Acting Chief Executive Kugandrie Govender. “Both the four-day series and the Momentum One-Day Cup will have the six competing teams divided into two pools of three teams each. They will play a double round of fixtures against teams in their own pool and a single round of cross-pool matches.

“This provides for a minimum of seven matches for each franchise and these will be followed by a five-day final at the conclusion of the CSA Four-Day Franchise Series contested by the two teams topping its respective pool. In the Momentum One-Day Cup after the conclusion of the preliminary round teams ending 1st. and 2nd. in each pool will contest a cross-pool semi-final each with the respective winners progressing through to the final.

“The T20 competition will be played over a single round (5 matches) with the top two teams qualifying for the final.

“I cannot stress enough the importance of our domestic system and the important role it plays in our talent development pipeline for the Proteas. One only has to look at the number of players who made successful international debuts in the three formats last season,” concluded Govender.
 
International donors pledged nearly $600m in humanitarian support to hundreds of thousands of mostly Muslim Rohingya on Thursday, succeeding in bridging a huge gap in funding for the Myanmar minority who fled their homes in 2017 amid a brutal military crackdown that is now the subject of a genocide investigation.

The United Kingdom, the United States and European Union organised the virtual conference along with the UN refugee agency (UNHCR), aiming to meet a target of $1bn in funding for 2020, less than half of which had been raised.

The US, the largest single donor, announced nearly $200m in new funds while the EU pledged about $113m and Britain about $60m. A number of other countries also contributed. China and Russia were invited but chose not to participate.

“The international community has demonstrated its strong commitment to the humanitarian response with its announcement of funding today totalling $597 million,” the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Filippo Grandi said.

More than 730,000 Rohingya poured across the border into neighbouring Bangladesh in August and September 2017 amid a military offensive the United Nations has said was carried out with genocidal intent.

Myanmar denies the allegations, saying the military was conducting legitimate security operations against armed groups after attacks against around a dozen security posts and police stations.

Despair in camps
Close to a million Rohingya now live in the crowded camps in Bangladesh.

Hundreds of thousands remain in Myanmar’s Rakhine state, where they are widely regarded as illegal immigrants and denied citizenship, free movement and access to healthcare. Most are confined to villages and camps that Human Rights Watch described this month as an open prison.

Dozens have died this year while embarking on risky journeys by boat to Malaysia and Indonesia in search of a better life.

UNHCR’s Grandi said the growing numbers taking to the sea – 2,400 this year – showed the growing despair among the refugees.

“We need … not to lose ground on the gains that we have achieved and to make further progress both for refugees and the host communities,” he said.

Bangladesh’s Minister of State for Foreign Affairs Shahriar Alam said the country was tired of hosting so many refugees, saying the situation was “untenable”.

“Bangladesh is not in a position to continue to take the burden anymore,” he said, adding that the Rohingya must return to Myanmar as soon as possible.

Bangladesh plans to move 100,000 refugees to Bhasan Char, a flood-prone island where it has built housing, he said.

Attempts to help the Rohingya to return home have failed to make progress.

Intensifying conflict

The conflict in the western state of Rakhine has intensified this year with the Myanmar military now fighting the Arakan Army, an ethnic Rakhine armed group. The government said last Saturday that most parts of the state would not be able to participate in November’s general election because it was too dangerous.

The UNHCR said donors, along with the Rohingya themselves, wanted to secure the refugees’ voluntary and safe return to their homes.

“The Government of Myanmar must take steps to address the root causes of the violence and displacement in Rakhine State and create the conditions for voluntary, safe, dignified, and sustainable returns,” the refugee agency said in a statement.

“This includes providing a pathway to citizenship and freedom of movement for Rohingya, guided by the Advisory Commission on Rakhine State’s recommendations and encouraged and supported by countries in the region. Myanmar must provide justice for the victims of human rights abuses and ensure that those responsible are held accountable.”

The 2017 violence is the subject of a genocide investigation by the International Court of Justice, which ordered Myanmar in January to take emergency measures to protect the Rohingya, saying it had caused “irreparable damage” to their rights.

Ahead of the donor conference, a group of 35 human rights and refugee organisations appealed to the US and other countries to acknowledge that what happened to the Rohingya constituted genocide, saying that such an acknowledgement would “spur the kind of multilateral diplomatic engagement and pressure needed” to ensure Myanmar refrained from committing further atrocities and would, ultimately, help create the conditions conducive to their return.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020...donors-pledge-nearly-600m-to-support-rohingya
 
Back
Top