What's new

The Rishabh Pant thread

Pant is a once in many generation cricketer. He reminds me of Sehwag plus keeping in alien conditions.

Averages 64 at home and 40 away. Plays game changing innings. Like Sehwag, he too has the knack of throwing his wicket at wrong time but when it clicks, he wins you a game on his own.

Pant averages 64 at home after playing the home series Vs England on rank turners. He has hardly got to feast on weaker teams at home.
 
Pant is a once in many generation cricketer. He reminds me of Sehwag plus keeping in alien conditions.

Averages 64 at home and 40 away. Plays game changing innings. Like Sehwag, he too has the knack of throwing his wicket at wrong time but when it clicks, he wins you a game on his own.

Pant averages 64 at home after playing the home series Vs England on rank turners. He has hardly got to feast on weaker teams at home.

But oppositions would be pretty happy if he keeps playing slogs like Wtc final at crucial stages of a match. 2019 WC semi final he should have stayed longer at the crease but chose to play a slog instead.
I dont think he is more talented than dhoni. When dhoni first emerged on to the scene he could really hit the ball hard and long but even he adapted his game to team requirements.
 
Pant is a once in many generation cricketer. He reminds me of Sehwag plus keeping in alien conditions.

Averages 64 at home and 40 away. Plays game changing innings. Like Sehwag, he too has the knack of throwing his wicket at wrong time but when it clicks, he wins you a game on his own.

Pant averages 64 at home after playing the home series Vs England on rank turners. He has hardly got to feast on weaker teams at home.

Yes, Pant is an exceptionally talented player, there is no doubt about that.

However, his play-style isn't very sustainable, especially if he tries going down the Sehwag route of batting at a high strike rate.

Sehwag's overseas average was poor, and Pant is at a very good stage of his career to show some discipline and learn the importance of his wicket.

I like him as a player, but he needs to learn how to put a price on his own wicket, which is the only thing preventing him from emerging as an even better batsman. He now has the confidence, he just needs to make some slight adjustments before he can ascend to the level of his talent.

He could easily be someone with a 50+ average in Tests and ODIs.

That shot in the WTC final was one of the ugliest shots I've seen played in a final, possibly trumping Misbah's famous scoop. Once a batter acknowledges that their wicket can turn the tide of the game, they will try to at least reduce some risks in their shot-making, or at best, they will try not to get carried away.

Pant will win you games with his aggression, but he will also lose you games if he doesn't control this aggression.

Like they say, you either live by the sword or die by it. Though in Pant's case, he's young enough to learn how not to die by the sword.
 
Wish that Pant slows down in his scoring rate and not take undue risks as India is kind of over reliant on him now.
If and when the Gills, Sharmas and Kohlis get in their groove, Pant can become free again.
 
Yes, Pant is an exceptionally talented player, there is no doubt about that.

However, his play-style isn't very sustainable, especially if he tries going down the Sehwag route of batting at a high strike rate.

Sehwag's overseas average was poor, and Pant is at a very good stage of his career to show some discipline and learn the importance of his wicket.

I like him as a player, but he needs to learn how to put a price on his own wicket, which is the only thing preventing him from emerging as an even better batsman. He now has the confidence, he just needs to make some slight adjustments before he can ascend to the level of his talent.

He could easily be someone with a 50+ average in Tests and ODIs.

That shot in the WTC final was one of the ugliest shots I've seen played in a final, possibly trumping Misbah's famous scoop. Once a batter acknowledges that their wicket can turn the tide of the game, they will try to at least reduce some risks in their shot-making, or at best, they will try not to get carried away.

Pant will win you games with his aggression, but he will also lose you games if he doesn't control this aggression.

Like they say, you either live by the sword or die by it. Though in Pant's case, he's young enough to learn how not to die by the sword.


Absolutely unnecessary. There was going to be no grand victory here like the Gabba so what was the need?
 
[MENTION=147179]Ahmed216[/MENTION], Pant doesn't have the other side of the game where he could block to save a test match. It is a hard job and often a pure defensive batsman like Pujara has struggled to bat all day like in WTC Final to save the test match so it is a bit harsh to expect the same from Pant.

Let Pant bat the way Sehwag, Gilchrist, Qdk etc do. He can be a lethal match winner and if he bats for two hours, he will take the game completely away from opposition and he keeps also so is not blocking a place for specialist batsman.
 
Last edited:
Absolutely unnecessary. There was going to be no grand victory here like the Gabba so what was the need?

I agree, it was just useless, especially after he grinded out and things looked a bit stable.

That type of shot represents the stupidity in this over-attacking mindset in test cricket, it is too unsustainable.

Guys like Sehwag did it at home, but when the ball is moving, this technique is useless.

Pant needs to just tone it down a little with that, especially in a crunch situation like the WTC Final.
 
https://www.hindustantimes.com/cric...e-superstar-rishabh-pant-101624687515509.html

Indian cricket has seen many young cricketers make their name in international cricket in the past 2 years. The fearless attitude of some young cricketers has been lauded by many former and current international players in the past year. One of the brightest talents to emerge out of the country in the last few years has been wicketkeeper-batsman Rishabh Pant. However, the swashbuckling batsman has faced a lot of criticism from former cricketers and Indian fans for his attacking style of play.

Pant was recently criticised for playing a risky shot that led to his dismissal in India’s second innings of the World Test Championship final. Pant had moved to 41 with four boundaries in his usual style – trying to get on top of the bowlers – but perished trying to hoick Trent Boult for a six.

Pant’s approach was questioned by the likes of Sunil Gavaskar, Irfan Pathan, Aakash Chopra, and more, who felt that the batsman should have batted with a little bit of caution since India had lost overnight batsmen Virat Kohli and Cheteshwar Pujara in quick succession. However, former England spinner Graeme Swann has jumped to Pant's aid, asking him not to change and urging the Indian team and its fans to back the way the batsman plays.

"He is a match-winner. All I want to say to cricket fans in India - don't fix what isn't broken. You have some absolute goldmine ready to be unearthed and used well for 10 years. Don't change Rishabh Pant. Let him fail. Let him be. He is absolutely worth it," Swann told SportsKeeda

Swann reminded how it was because of Pant's swagger in the first place that India were able to win matches in Australia and against England at home. Without Pant's terrific century in the final Test, where he played an outrageous reverse sweep/scoop off James Anderson, India wouldn't have made it to the final of the World Test Championship

"India have got an absolute superstar in Rishabh Pant going in at 6 or 7. Just go back one Test match in India’s history. That magnificent century he scored against England (in Ahmedabad) that won them that series. Never forget that," the former off-spinner added

"It was a counter-attacking innings, played against the grind, playing against the spin a lot of times. It was a brilliant hundred. Had he got in there and 'played the situation' and tried to block it, India would not have won that game. It is as simple as that."
 
Let's see how he performs against England in England this time. If England wants to get him out cheaply then they should first place their best fielder in slip position because Pant does give a chance to opposition initially. Also Sehwag and Gilchrist used to play proper cricketing shots and they never looked ugly while playing. :inti
 
Pant playing very well.

Just the right amount of aggression in his innings.
 
A good contribution, but threw his wicket away a bit and arguably should have scored more. Tail is exposed now.
 
He could have played better today. He is still an incredible talent. Surprised that people still doubt him.
 
<div style="width: 100%; height: 0px; position: relative; padding-bottom: 56.250%;"><iframe src="https://streamable.com/e/3ziig6" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="100%" allowfullscreen style="width: 100%; height: 100%; position: absolute;"></iframe></div>
 
Last edited:
He should learn to not throw his wicket away especially when our batsman at 3, 4 and 5 are batting like noobs. :inti

Better he comes up the order (at No.4) if he is so important! (Then we will need to search another wicket-keeper to take up his role like Sangakkara did)

It takes some time (experience) to bat with tail. First let him get accustomed to all playing conditions... He needs some partnerships with middle order batsmen. All I can remember is just 2 partnerships he had with top-order batsmen (one was with Rahul in the previous English tour and the other was with Pujara in last Australian tour). If we have better players at 3,4 & 5, we will see more improvement with Pant (This is a team game, that's how even Gilchrist flourished with 6 giant batsmen at the top & 4 extra-special bowlers below him! We don't have that kind of balance in our team)
 
Better he comes up the order (at No.4) if he is so important! (Then we will need to search another wicket-keeper to take up his role like Sangakkara did)

It takes some time (experience) to bat with tail. First let him get accustomed to all playing conditions... He needs some partnerships with middle order batsmen. All I can remember is just 2 partnerships he had with top-order batsmen (one was with Rahul in the previous English tour and the other was with Pujara in last Australian tour). If we have better players at 3,4 & 5, we will see more improvement with Pant (This is a team game, that's how even Gilchrist flourished with 6 giant batsmen at the top & 4 extra-special bowlers below him! We don't have that kind of balance in our team)

Agreed.
Infact, he could be perfect at Rahane position, that way he could still do the keeping.
 
For all his flambouyance and match-winning abilities, India wicket-keeper Rishabh Pant was a poor shadow of himself at Headingly, Leeds on Day 1 of the third Test against England.

But after the day's play, Pant revealed that he had to change his stance after being told by the umpire. The left-handed batter was batting outside the crease to negate swing formed footmarks in the pitch's danger area.

"Because I was standing outside the crease and my front-foot was coming into the danger area, so he (the umpire) told me that you can't stand there," Pant said during the virtual post-day press conference on Wednesday.

The 23-year-old got out going after an Ollie Robinson widish delivery for two runs as India capitulated against England pacers. India recorded their third-lowest total against England - just 78 runs in 40.4 overs.

He added, "So, I have (had) to change my stance, but as a cricketer I don't have to think too much about that, because it's everyone who is going to do that, umpires are going to say the same thing. I didn't do that the next ball and you move on."

Of late, Pant has been pressed into action early with the top-order consistently failing to deliver but the youngster sees that as an opportunity and not something that puts him under pressure.

"As a cricketer, I don't think in that manner. Whatever be the situation, you think about the team first and what you can do in that situation," he said.

"If the top-order collapses and you get an opportunity, I see it as an opportunity that if you can bail the team out of that situation, you are going to do wonders in your life as a cricketer," he said.

"I am not thinking too much about pressure as at the end of the day, everyone is thinking good for the team. So, we need to take everything on our chin rather than thinking about pressure."

Asked whether he was comfortable batting at number six in England, Pant responded in the positive.

"See, as a cricketer, there are two options -- one you can think of the team, second you can think about your personal performance, so the culture we have created here is that everyone has to think about the team, no matter what's the personal performances.

"Personal, individual things matter but we don't focus on that too much as the Indian cricket team," he explained.

Having won the toss and chosen to bat, India were bowled out in no time after an excellent opening spell from James Anderson sparked a collapse.

The hosts were 118 for no loss when stumps were drawn.

Pant also backed his skipper Virat Kohli's decision to bat first while admitting that the wicket was "soft" in the morning.

"It's part and parcel of the game. Every day the batting unit is giving hundred per cent, but sometimes, it doesn't go well," Pant said about the disastrous outing with the bat, which came just nine months after the 36 all out in Adelaide.

"In the morning, the wicket was slightly on the softer side and they bowled in good areas. We could have applied ourselves better. We can learn from it and only move on. That's all we can do as cricketers. You learn from your mistakes and improve."

He also said that Kohli's decision to bat first, despite the wicket being damp, was a collective call.

"I don't think so," he replied when asked if batting first was a tricky move.

"Whatever decision we take, we take as a team. So, once we have decided we are going to bat first, we are going to back our decision and move on. Yes, we could have applied much better but we can't keep on thinking too much about the toss."

https://www.outlookindia.com/websit...abh-pant-to-change-his-stance-at-leeds/392678
 
Why was Pant told by umpires to change his stance, wonders Gavaskar

Why was Pant told to change his stance, wonders Gavaskar
Says the batsman can stand anywhere

The legendary Sunil Gavaskar is baffled as to why the English umpires objected to Rishabh Pant’s stance of standing outside the crease during the ongoing third Test against England as he feels that rules don’t prevent him from doing so.


After the end of the first day’s play at Headingley, the swashbuckling wicketkeeper said he had to change his stance after being told by the umpire as batting outside the crease to negate swing formed footmarks in the pitch’s danger area. But Gavaskar said footmarks don’t determine a batsman’s stance. “I was wondering why was he told to change his stance, if that is true. I only read it. Batsman can stand anywhere, even on the middle of the pitch and when the batsman goes down the track against the spinners (footmarks can form even then),” Gavaskar said while commentating during the third day.

His fellow-commentator and former India player Sanjay Manjrekar called it “ridiculous”.

“Because I was standing outside the crease and my front-foot was coming into the danger area, he (the umpire) told me that you can’t stand there,” Pant had said at a virtual interaction after day one.


https://www.thehindu.com/sport/cric...s-stance-wonders-gavaskar/article36144832.ece
 
This is ridiculous. It seems the two neutral umpires rule needs to be brought back. The English umpires are subtlely helping the home team.
 
Never heard of anything like this in the past before. Is it possible to post a video or a picture to see exactly where he was standing?
 
Whatever the case maybe it seems Rishabh Pant has been possessed by Shahid Afridi.

What the hell was charging Anderson on the first ball he faced all about ????? Umpires telling him where he can stand at the crease or not, it all seems like a he doesnt care about playing for India.

This is really sad.
 
Very poor batsmanship from Pant on this tour so far. Not adapting to the match situation and not making any effort. Needs to have a word himself ahead of the Oval, where the conditions should suit his batting style.
 
He has got a very poor record when he is not playing in Australia and India.

Spin basher and flat track bully till now. He needs to work on his game
 
That was a pretty pointless innings.

No problem. A spanking from Shastri and he should have a sensational knock in the next 4 innings :)
 
Dont think i've seen a a batsman playing with a worse technique in England. What is he doing? Hanging his bat at balls leaving him with feet stuck
 
For all his flambouyance and match-winning abilities, India wicket-keeper Rishabh Pant was a poor shadow of himself at Headingly, Leeds on Day 1 of the third Test against England.

But after the day's play, Pant revealed that he had to change his stance after being told by the umpire. The left-handed batter was batting outside the crease to negate swing formed footmarks in the pitch's danger area.

"Because I was standing outside the crease and my front-foot was coming into the danger area, so he (the umpire) told me that you can't stand there," Pant said during the virtual post-day press conference on Wednesday.

The 23-year-old got out going after an Ollie Robinson widish delivery for two runs as India capitulated against England pacers. India recorded their third-lowest total against England - just 78 runs in 40.4 overs.

He added, "So, I have (had) to change my stance, but as a cricketer I don't have to think too much about that, because it's everyone who is going to do that, umpires are going to say the same thing. I didn't do that the next ball and you move on."

Of late, Pant has been pressed into action early with the top-order consistently failing to deliver but the youngster sees that as an opportunity and not something that puts him under pressure.

"As a cricketer, I don't think in that manner. Whatever be the situation, you think about the team first and what you can do in that situation," he said.

"If the top-order collapses and you get an opportunity, I see it as an opportunity that if you can bail the team out of that situation, you are going to do wonders in your life as a cricketer," he said.

"I am not thinking too much about pressure as at the end of the day, everyone is thinking good for the team. So, we need to take everything on our chin rather than thinking about pressure."

Asked whether he was comfortable batting at number six in England, Pant responded in the positive.

"See, as a cricketer, there are two options -- one you can think of the team, second you can think about your personal performance, so the culture we have created here is that everyone has to think about the team, no matter what's the personal performances.


"Personal, individual things matter but we don't focus on that too much as the Indian cricket team," he explained.

Having won the toss and chosen to bat, India were bowled out in no time after an excellent opening spell from James Anderson sparked a collapse.

The hosts were 118 for no loss when stumps were drawn.

Pant also backed his skipper Virat Kohli's decision to bat first while admitting that the wicket was "soft" in the morning.

"It's part and parcel of the game. Every day the batting unit is giving hundred per cent, but sometimes, it doesn't go well," Pant said about the disastrous outing with the bat, which came just nine months after the 36 all out in Adelaide.

"In the morning, the wicket was slightly on the softer side and they bowled in good areas. We could have applied ourselves better. We can learn from it and only move on. That's all we can do as cricketers. You learn from your mistakes and improve."

He also said that Kohli's decision to bat first, despite the wicket being damp, was a collective call.

"I don't think so," he replied when asked if batting first was a tricky move.

"Whatever decision we take, we take as a team. So, once we have decided we are going to bat first, we are going to back our decision and move on. Yes, we could have applied much better but we can't keep on thinking too much about the toss."

https://www.outlookindia.com/websit...abh-pant-to-change-his-stance-at-leeds/392678

Does this mean he wants to bat up the order?
 
The next Gilchrist after that Sankagarra as a no 3 batsman then an all time great Mamoon has already said it.

:inzi2
 
Pant has a heavy bottom hand technique like most gully cricketers. He always looking to drag the ball on the on side. You can't survive in English conditions with this technique. I was bullied when i mentioned that Samson should be groomed for test cricket. Pant is a hack, can't play quality bowling spell.
 
Pant has a heavy bottom hand technique like most gully cricketers. He always looking to drag the ball on the on side. You can't survive in English conditions with this technique. I was bullied when i mentioned that Samson should be groomed for test cricket. Pant is a hack, can't play quality bowling spell.

You weren't the only one. :inti
 
[MENTION=131701]Mamoon[/MENTION] whats the excuses for such lame tour by the so callee greatest ever batsmen/keeper in history of the game?
 
Imagine all this hoopla just before witnessing yet another masterpiece of an innings.
Already feeling sorry for these posters, they can't even judge talent if it danced naked in front if their eyes.

He does have ability and will score again on better wickets but to call him the next Gilchrist etc is wrong his technique in swinging and seaming wickets is awful at times.
 
Imagine all this hoopla just before witnessing yet another masterpiece of an innings.

You are now reminding me of Shahid Afridi's fans. Obviously he can score a 50 in next inning but what about the 4 tests and 1 inning on this England tour so far? Can't people comment on that? :inti
 
He does have ability and will score again on better wickets but to call him the next Gilchrist etc is wrong his technique in swinging and seaming wickets is awful at times.

I think apart from the wickets another thing that hasn't helped Pant on this England tour is the catching. He needs some luck when he tries to slog everything on the leg side from the opposition fielders as well. :inti
 
I get the intent and the way he plays but some of the shots he has played on this tour of England have been ridiculous and lacking in responsibility.
 
He looks like a tailender with awful techique.
I don't understand why he is so overrated and hyped.

He is awful player of pace bowling.
 
[MENTION=131701]Mamoon[/MENTION] whats the excuses for such lame tour by the so callee greatest ever batsmen/keeper in history of the game?

He is the not the GOAT WK batsman, but he can be in the future. He is the heir to Gilchrist and he will learn from these experiences.

He has won his team a Test series in Australia at such a young age. There are other teams who have not even drawn a Test match in Australia since 1995.

Pant is a player of extraordinary credentials. He will only get better with experience.
 
His batting has been so so irresponsible

If you didnt know he was the indian keeper youd have thought hes a number 10 or 11 the way hes batted Atrocious
 
His batting has been so so irresponsible

If you didnt know he was the indian keeper youd have thought hes a number 10 or 11 the way hes batted Atrocious

He’s struggling and out of form in these conditions the English bowlers have him in a rut his technique isn’t standing up to these conditions he’s struggling to figure out how to build his innings defensive aggressive nothings coming of at the moment.
 
He is the not the GOAT WK batsman, but he can be in the future. He is the heir to Gilchrist and he will learn from these experiences.

He has won his team a Test series in Australia at such a young age. There are other teams who have not even drawn a Test match in Australia since 1995.

Pant is a player of extraordinary credentials. He will only get better with experience.

That would mean he will surpass Gilchrist and Sangakarra in the future hyping up someone is fine being realistic is also good at the moment he hasn’t surpassed Rizwan in tests average wise.
 
Inzi on the 1992 test tour of England looked like a really ugly hack.

This is all a learning curve for Pant.
 
[MENTION=139595]Ab Fan[/MENTION] it’s ok bro, you can admit to your mistakes

What mistakes? People over here can do all the Bhangra they want but reality is he has won his team two test series in Australia and those were the only two wins we had worth mentioning in last 10 years as far as overseas are concerned.

We have specialist batsman who are 33 and 35 year old but can still barely hold a bat in conditions outside India and Australia and here you have folks doing Bhangra over a 23 year old wicket keeper batsman on match by match failure lol.
 
Last edited:
He is the not the GOAT WK batsman, but he can be in the future. He is the heir to Gilchrist and he will learn from these experiences.

He has won his team a Test series in Australia at such a young age. There are other teams who have not even drawn a Test match in Australia since 1995.

Pant is a player of extraordinary credentials. He will only get better with experience.

sorry but to be a GOAT player you need to perform against all teams and in all conditions. is comical you continue to think that just performing in Australia and failing everywhere else is a sign of greatness.
 
Legendary warrior in Aus.

Hack in Eng.

He will learn from his mistakes.

Looks like the OP has come out crawling. :))

Will have to go back to hiding soon.
 
sorry but to be a GOAT player you need to perform against all teams and in all conditions. is comical you continue to think that just performing in Australia and failing everywhere else is a sign of greatness.

Winning a Test series for your country in Australia against Cummins, Starc, Hazlewood and Lyon, and having 3 Test hundreds in Australia and England by the age of 23, that too for an Asian WK batsman, is definitely the signs of a great player.

For comparison, Babar Azam, the so-called top 3 batsman in the world is 26 and has only 1 Test hundred outside Asia, and he is a specialist batsman.

It simply puts into perspective how special Pant is.

He is the most talented WK batsman produced by Asia since Dhoni burst onto the scene in 2004-05, and he has all the ability to to have a career like Gilchrist.

He just oozes talent and confidence. All he needs is some maturity which will come with time. BCCI knows how to groom diamonds and they will not let a generational talent like him go to waste.

They made a hell of a player out of Rohit Sharma even though it took him 6 years to find his feet, and they will not let Pant’s incredible ability go to waste.

I don’t think non-Indian fans, especially Pakistani fans, need to worry too much about the future of Pant and the value he brings to the Indian team and the impact he has on the psychology of the opposition.
 
He obviously has immense ability. I wouldn’t be worried about him if I was an Indian fan. He needs to keep working hard on his keeping though.
 
He is the not the GOAT WK batsman, but he can be in the future. He is the heir to Gilchrist and he will learn from these experiences.

He has won his team a Test series in Australia at such a young age. There are other teams who have not even drawn a Test match in Australia since 1995.

Pant is a player of extraordinary credentials. He will only get better with experience.

What extraordinary credentials?? As if knocks like gabba have never beem played in cricket.
Ur post justifies the title of this thread overrated and overhyped rishabh. He's got some ability undoubtedly but let him perform first then you can vent out your essays. Many a talented players in the past have fizzled out after promising starts. guys here are sometimes very naive. Few good innings and they start comparing them to legends of the game
 
Pant is a very good player who can win you games singlehandedly but he will also bee found wanting in swinging conditions.
 
Showing that he can bat responsibly and isn't just a slogger.

Excellent innings under pressure.
 
The most intimidating batsman in the world, especially in big games with the series on line, much like the great Adam Gilchrist.

With Rishabh Pant coming to bat at 6 or 7, life is never easy for the opposition captain.
 
Best wicket keeper batsman going around at present. His glove work was questionable before but sorted that issue too. In his short career he has already won many test matches for India from difficult situations. You can feel the presence of aura and sense of intimidation among opposition when he is around. His career can be as good as Gilchrist's if he keeps working hard. Terrific player.

:kp
 
Showed some maturity in this inning but there wasn't really any pressure there. Bowlers like Bumrah, Yadav and Shardul are scoring runs easily on this pitch.

Still a long way before he can be called the next Gilly. First step should be to make up his mind whether he wants to attack or play defensive and when to change the gears. He played defensive cricket today but when the time came to attack he got out. Second step should be to take his average above 40. :inti
 
His best knock of the summer by far. Finally fulfilled his potential in this series.
 
What extraordinary credentials?? As if knocks like gabba have never beem played in cricket.
Ur post justifies the title of this thread overrated and overhyped rishabh. He's got some ability undoubtedly but let him perform first then you can vent out your essays. Many a talented players in the past have fizzled out after promising starts. guys here are sometimes very naive. Few good innings and they start comparing them to legends of the game

I will only say this - people who fail to see how special a talent Pant is know absolutely nothing about cricket.

These are the same people who did not think he had what it takes to pull off what he did at Gabba, and now the same people are doubting him again. It is heartbreaking and hysterical at the same.
 
Thakur the tailender scored more than Pant today.

People who hype up Pant are the ones who know nothing about cricket; a fluke 50 on a flat road and he's the second coming of Gilly.

LOL!
 
Scored a few on a flat track where even the indian tail is making hay but overall hes a had a very poor series

Unless he can work out a low risk method to his play his batting is going to be inconsistent and costly to india
 
I will only say this - people who fail to see how special a talent Pant is know absolutely nothing about cricket.

These are the same people who did not think he had what it takes to pull off what he did at Gabba, and now the same people are doubting him again. It is heartbreaking and hysterical at the same.

High quality batsman. Imagine him playing regularly at home now. He will take his average to 45 in tests.
 
I don't see anything special in him. His batting style is ugly and looks like getting out at any moment. Indian batting has significantly downgraded in past years. No new talent coming up. Kohli, Pujara going over the hill has not helped.
 
You know something is wrong when you have to wait for a home series to prove that your favorite player is the next Gilchrist. :))

So far he has flopped in NZ, Eng and WI. He is yet to tour South Africa and Sri Lanka. He can improve his record in West Indies. I am hopeful of that but not too confident about South Africa either especially if their bowling attack consists of Nortje, Rabada and Ngidi. He has good stats in Australia but he isn't the first Indian who achieved success in Australia. He will score runs on Indian pitches just like every other Indian batsman does these days. :inti
 
High quality batsman. Imagine him playing regularly at home now. He will take his average to 45 in tests.

What is your definition of high quality batsmen? specially for Indian batsmen? So far he has performed just okay as a Indian test match keeper batsman? He has played some good innings in Australia but then again most Indian batsmen have scored runs in Australia specially since the turn of the century?

He is a good player but I am not sure he is high quality. So far in this tour he has been hopeless but its clear he likes certain type of pitches which is okay because he is a keeper batsmen.

High quality batsmen in my opinion would be someone like Sangakara as a test match batsmen or Gilchrist? do you agree?
 
Back
Top