Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Biden has now been linked to bribes in China, if this news is true then Biden will have to step aside.
US election 2020: Early voting records smashed amid enthusiasm wave
State election officials across the US are reporting record numbers of voters casting their ballots ahead of election day on 3 November.
More than 22m Americans had voted early by Friday, either in person or by mail, according to the US Election Project.
At the same point in the 2016 race, about 6m votes had been cast.
Experts say the surge in early voting correlates to the coronavirus pandemic, which has caused many people to seek alternatives to election day voting.
On Tuesday, Texas, a state that has relatively tight restrictions on who can qualify for postal voting, set a record for most ballots cast on the first day of early voting.
On Monday, the Columbus Day federal holiday, officials in Georgia reported126,876 votes cast - also a state record.
In Ohio, a crucial swing state, more than 2.3m postal ballots have been requested, double the figure in 2016.
Reports indicate that registered Democrats have so far outvoted registered Republicans - casting more than double the number of ballots. And of these early voting Democrats, women and black Americans are voting in particularly high numbers. Some are motivated by dislike for Donald Trump, while others have been energised by racial justice protests throughout the summer following the police killing of George Floyd in Minnesota.
But this early advantage does not mean that Democrats can already claim victory. Republicans, who claim postal voting is vulnerable to fraud, say Democrats may win the early vote, but that Republicans will show up in large numbers on election day.
According to a 2017 study by the Brennan Center for Justice, the rate of voting fraud overall in the US is between 0.00004% and 0.0009%.
The enormous numbers of voters have led to long lines, with some people waiting for up to 11 hours for an opportunity to vote.
Younger people, who historically have been difficult to get to the polls, appear to be turning out in larger numbers this year. The youth vote may be the highest its been since 2008 for the election of Barack Obama - the country's first black president.
A recent survey by Axios found that four in 10 university students said they planned to protest if Mr Trump wins. Six in 10 said they would shame friends who could vote but choose not to.
By contrast, only 3% of surveyed students said they would protest if Joe Biden was elected.
This is lame. Trump needs something more stronger.
His own Son in Law has made so much money since Trump entered the white house.
If an old bloke like Biden who may not make the full term beats Trump it will be embarrasing.
I watched both the Town Hall sessions yesterday on YouTube.
The Trump one was quite a brisk hour, with a fiery host and some challenging questions for the President, but man.... the Biden one.
That is time I will never get back. The guy is so mediocre, rambling and dull. And yes, he is really, really old. (And he carries every year of it as well — unlike Trump.)
What a choice for the American people. A KKK-sympathising orange loon, or a kindly old fool who will probably be in a care home in a few years.
Honestly I don’t blame them if they vote for Trump after watching those bizarre Town Hall sessions.
Instead of labelling.
Disprove the statement.
Instead of labelling.
Disprove the statement.
I watched both the Town Hall sessions yesterday on YouTube.
The Trump one was quite a brisk hour, with a fiery host and some challenging questions for the President, but man.... the Biden one.
That is time I will never get back. The guy is so mediocre, rambling and dull. And yes, he is really, really old. (And he carries every year of it as well — unlike Trump.)
What a choice for the American people. A KKK-sympathising orange loon, or a kindly old fool who will probably be in a care home in a few years.
Honestly I don’t blame them if they vote for Trump after watching those bizarre Town Hall sessions.
The polls do not account for the silent majority. The ones who would vote against the status quo but are victims of liberal abuse. If you voted for Trump or Brexit, you're racist according to the liberals.
This is why the polls got it so wrong in 2016; and most likely will again in 2020.
Also, I may agree if it was just the ‘liberal’ media showing Biden with a lead but even Fox News shows Biden ahead with a 10 point margin.
But that doesn’t make sense as polls are supposed to be random and anonymous. How would the liberals or anyone know who one supported in the poll? Also, polls got it wrong in 2016 but margin was much thinner than now.
Also, a major news broke a couple days prior to the 2016 elections about Hilary and the emails. Trump would really need a miracle like that again.
His favorite is about to lose, let him cope.
If polls were accurate then there would be no need to have voting.
If polls were accurate then there would be no need to have voting.
US election 2020: American lives that could be reshaped in weeks
There are tens of millions of Americans whose access to healthcare could drastically change when the Supreme Court rules on President Barack Obama's signature law on 10 November. Here are their stories.
Allie Marotta has heard the tales of people giving up their dreams in exchange for a job which provides health insurance. She says the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is why she's been able to still pursue hers.
Diagnosed with type 1 diabetes in 2006, Marotta describes it as a "fatal illness that's made chronic by the use of medication". Without access to insulin, death takes a matter of hours. Marotta also has celiac disease - a common autoimmune combination.
Marotta says she couldn't have entered the performing arts industry in New York City without the ACA's provision allowing children to stay on their parents' plans until age 26. After the pandemic hit, she's struggled with work, but is still able to access health coverage.
"In my community, no one has health benefits for a job because performing arts is all independent contractors and freelance," she notes, adding that she's helped many friends navigate the marketplace system.
It's the same story for gig workers, restaurant staff and those in hospitality across the country. But in the years since its enactment, prices for many marketplace plans have risen to hundreds of dollars per month. Marotta says when she aged off her parents' coverage in December, she couldn't afford to pay for the plans she qualified for under the ACA.
"It's already so flawed, and this is the only crumb you're willing to give the American people," Marotta says. "It was already difficult for me to access the ACA, and you're taking that away?"
What is the point, she wonders, of a health system that only works for the healthy?
The ACA brought health insurance coverage to millions of Americans when it was signed into law back in 2010. It was a campaign promise of candidate Donald Trump's to repeal and replace it but he's been unable to do that so far in his first term.
The Trump administration's work to dismantle the act has now culminated in a question of its constitutionality. Next month, it'll be before a conservative Supreme Court, with President Trump's third justice Amy Coney Barrett potentially on the bench, and it's uncertain what its fate may be.
Not how it works James, you have said that Trump is a KKK sympathizer, you dont prove innocence, you prove guilt.
But he has implicitly supported the Proud Boys who are another violent fascist group declared as extremist by the FBI, though not all members are connected to white supremacy.
I don’t think that Trump is actually a fascist - he was a Democrat until recently - but he is happy to use racist feeling as a sales and marketing tool and for that reason alone should be unconscionable to any person of colour with the education to understand his tactics. Every day he remains in the White House widens the racial fault lines in American society.
The left continually claim Trump is racist and some have swallowed their propaganda. It has been proven so many times that he is not racist I'm not even going to get into that.
The proud boys are led by a latino which burnt the left because they were calling them a white supremacist group only to find that there are many members that are black. Now they say oh yeah but some of them have ties to white supremacist.
If your only source of information is controlled by the left then yes you may think that Trump is racist.
Read what I posted. Did I write that he was racist, or that he is deliberately stirring up racist feeling?
So only *some* Proud Boys are racist. I suppose it’s possible to be a non-racist fascist. Trump deliberately courts them, dog whistles to them.
Listen beyond the face value of his words and dig into the context, the deeper structure of what he is saying.
For those of you who are visual learners....
1973. Biden enters politics
1974.
��
follow the story of Biden's crack head son, Delaware pawn shop and his corruption
plenty of material for you if you know what I mean![]()
^ notwithstanding all of the above, Biden still seems to be winning handsomely. Just goes to show how badly Trump has messed this up.
Yes I have been thinking along the same lines for a couple of days..
just in May it was a no contest with predictions of huge victory
people were comparing it to Reagans win (which was stupid Reagan was a beast just look at this crazy looking picture)
View attachment 103890
Covid 19 destroyed Trump's chances becauseI feel his actions were not decisive on either side
opening or closing of economy
and this is coming back to bite him in his b***
another crazy picture from the 80 election while removing a sitting president I mean he did unprecedented stuff
View attachment 103891
no wonder Reagan is a God among boomers...
another crazy picture from the 80 election while removing a sitting president I mean he did unprecedented stuff
View attachment 103891
no wonder Reagan is a God among boomers...
You should look at the map of 84 then.. hahah
Joe Biden worried in 1977 that certain de-segregation policies would cause his children to grow up 'in a racial jungle'
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bu...ation-would-create-a-racial-jungle-2019-7?amp
Biden is an outright racist.
Yet liberals want this guy as President. Well, anyone who support Biden not only supports a racist but also a kiddy-fiddler.
another crazy picture from the 80 election while removing a sitting president I mean he did unprecedented stuff
no wonder Reagan is a God among boomers...
Note, when liberals are pushed for evidence, they retreat.
Liberals now claiming "Did I write he (Trump) was racist."
Cop-out of all cop-outs. These very liberal lunatics spent a good part of 4 years claiming Trump was racist. You can even quote them from PP.
Don't believe the hype.
Joe Biden worried in 1977 that certain de-segregation policies would cause his children to grow up 'in a racial jungle'
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bu...ation-would-create-a-racial-jungle-2019-7?amp
Biden is an outright racist.
Yet liberals want this guy as President. Well, anyone who support Biden not only supports a racist but also a kiddy-fiddler.
follow the story of Biden's crack head son, Delaware pawn shop and his corruption
plenty of material for you if you know what I mean![]()
Boring. Same old spiel from liberals. Most of it irrelevant and debunked anyway.
Doesn't change the fact Biden said what he did. He is an outright racist and a China puppet. Crook from top to bottom.
Interesting though is that liberals are now claiming they never called Trump (and Brexit) supporters racist, and now captain obvious pulls out the birther movement.
Liberalism is the disease to destroy, not covid 19. It's obvious they're running scared now, now that their name calling and lies have been exposed.
![]()
Cowardice. I knew you didn't have the guts to debate my points. I see what a snowflake looks like now.
I don’t understand exactly what is being achieved by this whole debate about who is more racist between Trump and Biden. Both candidates are in their 70s, it would actually be a surprise if they haven’t said anything racist in their careers.
It’s pretty clear at this point that these are not the major factors that will play a part on who will be president . People care about how their life is going to get better now and going forward.
From what I see people are definitely getting tired of this mud slinging politics and just want to see a concrete plan of handling the virus and getting the economy back on track.
Overall, the current strategy is definitely hurting Trump more than Biden.
Trump: Biden will 'listen to the scientists' if elected
https://thehill.com/homenews/521638-trump-biden-will-listen-to-the-scientists-if-elected
Why is Trump campaigning for Biden?
Had the Democrats spent time grooming a fresh candiate, with youth and vigour, instead of spending 4 years trying to overturn Trump's win, we would be in a different situation.
Biden was meant to run in 2016, until Obama convinced Biden, it was Hillary's turn. Hillary was damaged goods. These same Democrats repeatedly stated Trump would never win, hey presto, complacency got the better of them. As a result Democrats have very little in policy, but plenty in mud.
I think its too early to say who is winning in terms of strategy, but Trump can get away with anything and his base will love it. His Rockstar persona have packed rallies to the rafters, with 10000s queing outside etc.
Trump is neck and neck in key swing states. He feeds of controversy. He's accomplishment as presidents are ignored.
All this mud slinging, why by the way isn't anything new in US politics, has one main purporse - the colour and gender vote.
It's not over till the fat lady sings.
Yea I guess we will find out in November or maybe later lol. But to be brutally honest, it is already a big failure on Trumps part that it has gotten to this stage when it really should have been a landslide victory. Especially against a weak opposition candidate like Biden, who by your own admission is well past his prime.
Before you call me a neo-liberal lol I do want to clarify that I preferred a Trump re-election pre-Covid times. However, he just completely messed up handling the virus. I thought him getting COVID was his last shot at a comeback by showing a more sober approach to the virus but no the guy is just not capable of it.
US election 2020: Trump and Biden feud over debate topics
US President Donald Trump and his White House challenger Joe Biden are feuding over plans for their final TV debate.
The Republican president's campaign accused organisers of this week's showdown of helping the Democrat by leaving out foreign policy as a topic.
The Biden camp shot back that Mr Trump was trying to avoid questions about his response to the coronavirus pandemic.
Mr Biden has a commanding lead nationally in opinion polls with two weeks to go until the election.
But he has a smaller lead in the handful of key US states that will ultimately decide the outcome.
What did the Trump campaign say?
On Monday, the president's camp sent a letter to the Commission on Presidential Debates calling for topics to be adjusted for the final primetime duel this Thursday.
Trump campaign manager Bill Stepien said in the letter that the campaigns had already agreed foreign policy would be the focus of the third debate.
The topics were announced by moderator and NBC News correspondent Kristen Welker last week: American families, race in America, climate change, national security and leadership.
During a campaign rally on Monday afternoon in Prescott, Arizona, Mr Trump described Ms Welker as a "radical Democrat" and said she would be "no good".
Mr Stepien accused Mr Biden of being "desperate to avoid conversations about his own foreign policy record" and the commission of trying to "insulate Biden from his own history".
"The Commission's pro-Biden antics have turned the entire debate season into a fiasco and it is little wonder why the public has lost faith in its objectivity," he wrote.
He also accused Mr Biden of trying to avoid questions over reports about purported emails from his son, Hunter, and alleged conflicts of interest.
How did the Biden campaign respond?
The Democrat's camp hit back that it was actually Mr Trump who was trying to duck questions.
"The campaigns and the Commission agreed months ago that the debate moderator would choose the topics," said national press secretary TJ Ducklo.
"The Trump campaign is lying about that now because Donald Trump is afraid to face more questions about his disastrous Covid response.
"As usual, the president is more concerned with the rules of a debate than he is getting a nation in crisis the help it needs."
What are the debate rules?
Following public criticism over the handling of the first debate, the commission has adopted a new rule to mute microphones in the final event.
The 90-minute debate structure will be divided into 15-minute segments. At the start of each new topic, both candidates will have two minutes of uninterrupted time - during which the opponent's microphone will be off.
The rest of the time will be open discussion - and the microphones will not be muted during this period.
In a statement announcing the decision, the debate commission said they determined it was "appropriate to adopt measures intended to promote adherence to agreed upon rules".
The commission noted that "one [campaign] may think they go too far, and one may think they do not go far enough", but that these actions provided the right balance in the interests of the public.
What happened with the last two debates?
The Trump campaign chief noted on Monday that the moderator of the cancelled second debate on 15 October, Steve Scully, had been suspended after tweeting to a prominent Trump critic, then lying that his account had been hacked.
Top US journalist suspended after false hacking claims
Mr Stepien also accused the moderator of the first debate, Fox News' Chris Wallace, of having acted as "a third combatant" against Mr Trump.
The first Trump-Biden duel back on 29 September descended into insults between the candidates, with the president interrupting many more times than the Democrat did, according to post-debate statistics from US media outlets.
How is early voting going?
Nearly 30 million early voters have already cast their ballots, compared with just six million at this point before the last presidential election in 2016.
Experts say the coronavirus pandemic has spurred many to cast their ballot ahead of time to avoid crowding at polling stations on 3 November, though some early voters have faced long queues.
New Covid-19 cases rising rapidly across US
On Monday, Republicans were dealt a defeat by the US Supreme Court as it declined to take up a case on postal ballots in the critical swing-voting state of Pennsylvania.
Republicans had argued only ballots received by election day should be counted, and were contesting a state Supreme Court decision to allow late ballots to count.
Now that America's highest court has refused to hear the case, any ballots received within three days of 3 November will be counted, even if they do not have a clear postmark.
Chief Justice John Roberts sided with the court's three liberal justices in the case.
US election 2020: Why it can be hard to vote in the US
A fierce battle over who should vote and how has sparked hundreds of lawsuits and prompted accusations of voter suppression. So what are the barriers to voting and why do they exist?
Images of the long queues of early voters were both celebrated as a sign of enthusiasm and criticised as evidence of a creaking electoral system.
Queues, restrictive voting laws and limited access to polling stations all keep people from participating in the democratic process, says Andrea Hailey, the CEO of Vote.org, a non-partisan non-profit that aims to use technology to help people register to vote.
Some of those obstacles have been amplified by the pandemic, which has led to a nationwide shortage of poll workers and fewer in-person polling stations. "People are having to jump through an extra series of hoops just to participate," Ms Hailey warned.
In response to the obvious risks in getting large numbers of people to polling stations this year, many states eased up on voting restrictions. This meant more Americans can vote early, in person or by mail, than ever before. But not everyone is on board.
There are currently over 300 lawsuits in 44 states concerning how absentee votes are counted, who is allowed to vote early and how mail-in ballots are collected. Republican-run states say restrictions are necessary to clamp down on voter fraud, while Democrats say these are attempts to keep people from exercising their civic rights.
So what are the challenges facing people trying to vote?
10-hour waits
In Georgia, thousands of voters waited hours just to cast their ballot during early voting. Many attribute the long wait to voter enthusiasm, but other factors - like a limited number of polls, understaffing or computer glitches - have also been blamed.
It's not known how many people are put off from voting because of the queues. But it's clear who it inconveniences more.
A survey conducted by Massachusetts Institute of Technology found that black voters waited, on average, 16 minutes in line during the 2016 election, while white voters only waited 10 minutes. Other studies backed that up.
And long queues disproportionately affect wage workers, who don't get paid time off to vote.
Naked ballots and other strict rules
Policies like requiring voters to print out a form can dissuade younger or poorer voters, who are less likely to own a printer, from voting, says Ms Hailey.
In Pennsylvania, the state supreme court ruled that ballots mailed in without a secrecy envelope hiding the identity of the voter would be declared invalid. This decision, issued so shortly before the election, caused concern that significant numbers of "naked ballots" would be thrown away.
Before coronavirus, many states required you to have your mail-in ballot signed by a notary or witnesses. Since the pandemic, many of those states have eased restrictions - but not all.
North Carolina, South Carolina, Oklahoma, Alaska and Alabama still require at least one witness to legitimise a mail-in ballot.
Long drives
In rural parts of America, voters may have to drive for hours to reach an in-person polling station.
Four Directions, a Native American voting rights advocacy group, says that many Native Americans living on reservations have limited access to voting.
In Nevada, for instance, members of the Pyramid Lake Paiutes must drive almost 100 miles (160km) round trip to get to the closest early voting location.
In Arizona, a lawsuit filed by members of the Navajo Nation asked for extra time to get postal votes in, because there is just one post office every 707 square miles.
ID laws
Once people get through the line, they may have to prove they are who they say they are.
In 35 states, voters must show some sort of ID at the poll. While some allow a written affidavit if an ID is missing, a handful of states, namely Wisconsin, Texas, Kansas, Indiana, Tennessee, Missouri and Georgia, do not.
Supporters of voter ID laws, like Wisconsin's ex-governor Scott Walker, who passed one of the country's strictest voter-ID laws in 2016, say they make it "easy to vote but hard to cheat".
But others say fears of in-person voter fraud are overblown, and should not outweigh the harms caused by disenfranchising the poor, homeless, or disabled voters, who may not drive or have a permanent address.
Voter ID laws have emerged in the last decade as part of a wider push by Republican legislatures, ostensibly with the aim of curbing voter fraud, says University of Wisconsin-Madison professor Kenneth Mayer. But he says the laws' real aim is to keep voters who are more likely to vote Democrat - like the young, poor or African-Americans - at home.
"It's a common trope that everybody has an ID. You need an ID to get on an airplane… to open a bank account. But there are people who don't have bank accounts, who don't fly," he says.
The US is not the only country to have voter-ID laws - the UK has piloted new laws in local elections and this year a British court upheld them, paving the way for them to be enacted nationwide.
In the US, no evidence of widespread voter fraud has emerged. A commission launched by the Trump administration to look into the 2016 election was disbanded without publishing a report.
The White House said at the time that many US states had refused to co-operate.
Roll purges
In the US, local counties administer the elections - and each county or state has its own rules and regulations. Some regularly purge voters names from lists of registered voters, which mean voters need to register all over again.
There is a case before Wisconsin's top court that could strike 130,000 names off the voter list. A conservative law firm had sued the state because the election commission did not immediately remove people from the list who had not responded within 30 days to a letter identifying them as someone who may have moved.
The battle is split along partisan lines in a state that narrowly supported Trump in the 2016 election. Republicans say the commission failed to uphold the law by letting people stay on the rolls, while Democrats say the law disproportionately affects young, poor and minority voters who may not have stable housing.
Prison voting bans
Most states also restrict the voting rights of felons - criminals who have been convicted of more serious crimes and sentenced to prison. Some states automatically restore voting rights after the sentence is served, while others wait until after probation and parole is served, and after all fines have been paid.
In 2018, Florida restored the voting rights of 1.5m non-violent felons. Soon after, the state amended the law to say that felons must prove they have paid all fines and fees before they vote.
Former New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg - who briefly ran for the Democratic presidential nomination - donated $16m (£12.3m) to help pay the fines and fees of 32,000 black and Hispanic former felons.
His donation prompted the state's Republican attorney general to ask the FBI to investigate it for "potential violations of election law".
FBI says Iran and Russia have US voter information
US national security officials have reported Iran was responsible for sending threatening emails to Democratic voters.
The emails appeared to come from a far-right pro-Trump group and were meant to "incite unrest", National Intelligence Director John Ratcliffe said.
Mr Ratcliffe also said US officials found Iran and Russia have obtained "some voter registration information".
The announcement comes 13 days before the presidential election.
The unusual intelligence briefing this close to the vote is seen as a testament to the government's concerns over voting interference and disinformation campaigns from foreign actors.
Mr Ratcliffe said Iran's "spoof emails" claimed to be sent by the Proud Boys in order to "intimidate voters, incite unrest and damage" President Donald Trump.
He added that the voter data could be used in attempts to "communicate false information to registered voters that they hope will sow confusion chaos and undermine your confidence in American democracy".
Mr Ratcliffe said officials "have not seen the same actions from Russia", but are aware they have some voter information.
In many states, voter data is available upon request, though each state has different requirements on who can request voter information, what data is available and how this data might be used, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.
"If you receive an intimidating or manipulative email in your inbox, don't be alarmed and do not spread it," Mr Ratcliffe said, calling the actions to influence US voters "desperate attempts by desperate adversaries".