What's new

[VIDEO] "I think the World Cup final will be a repeat of the 2017 Champions Trophy": Imad Wasim

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
217,897
Imad Wasim chats to Saj about missing out on selection for the Afghanistan series and Asia Cup, his hopes of an ODI recall, Pakistan's chances at the Asia Cup and World Cup, looks forward to the CPL, his experience of MLC, Mohammad Amir's continued retirement from international cricket and more.

 
As per the conditions of sri lankan wickets Imad wasim can become a lethal asset there with bat and ball... He must have been picked for the Asia Cup.
 
He had good responses to the questions about league vs international, always interesting to hear an honest player's perspective.
 
"I can't name them. I can name them when I'll be sitting on a tv channel and can see who's in form or not" - seems like he sees himself missing out on the WC. Hopefully that's not the case, we need his lower order batting.
 
Honestly imad wasim fitness is questionable i don't think he can survive 50 overs in the field. Also he hasn't played list A cricket much which indicates he is not that much keen for 50 over cricket
 
Not so sure he can really hit from ball 1. He is lazy and had he worked harder he could have become a number 4 / 5 in LOI cricket. Not the right bat for no 7 or 8.
 
For Imad Wasim It's important to note that professional cricketers typically work closely with fitness trainers, physiotherapists, and other medical professionals to address these issues and maintain their physical health and performance but it seems like Imad is not so concerned about his fitness.
 
He makes an interesting point about the Board, the coaching staff and players working together regarding planning.

Too often there is no proper planning regarding selection and then the panic button is pressed in Pakistan cricket.
 
Imad would have scored a solid 35 odd today and helped Pakistan to 250 against Afghanistan.
 
Not so sure he can really hit from ball 1. He is lazy and had he worked harder he could have become a number 4 / 5 in LOI cricket. Not the right bat for no 7 or 8.
Agree he's so lazy that he also never tried to spin the ball. He has great control but only wanted to be known as new ball bowler
 
Agree he's so lazy that he also never tried to spin the ball. He has great control but only wanted to be known as new ball bowler
I don't think any spinner in the history of cricket has ever wanted to be known as a new ball bowler.
 
I meant he was content with being known as new ball bowler
I don't think he is.

I'm pretty sure he prefers to bowl later in the innings when more fielders are allowed out of the circle.
 
According to google Bard:

Bowling phaseBowling averageEconomy rate
With the new ball29.334.95
After the 10th over37.505.35

Imad was certainly more potent with the new ball.

I guess The question is, would you rather have Shaheen / Naseem maximize swing and seam with the new ball or give it to someone like Imad who extracts a bit more drift and bounce with it? Based on these stats, we are probably better off giving the new ball to the pacers.

Nawaz averages 31 with the ball in ODI's with an econ of 4.94. So from ONLY a bolwing perspective, Nawaz is probably the better bowing choice if Imad doesn't take the new ball.
 
According to google Bard:

Bowling phaseBowling averageEconomy rate
With the new ball29.334.95
After the 10th over37.505.35

Imad was certainly more potent with the new ball.

I guess The question is, would you rather have Shaheen / Naseem maximize swing and seam with the new ball or give it to someone like Imad who extracts a bit more drift and bounce with it? Based on these stats, we are probably better off giving the new ball to the pacers.

Nawaz averages 31 with the ball in ODI's with an econ of 4.94. So from ONLY a bolwing perspective, Nawaz is probably the better bowing choice if Imad doesn't take the new ball.
As former CS Mohammad Wasim said, Imad is a one-trick pony with the ball. And since we now have pacers that are very potent with the new-ball, that one trick is no longer needed. I'd rather a spinner that will rip it more and help the side to continue taking wickets in the middle overs.
 
Imad maybe a one trick pony, but players like Glenn mcgrath have proven the "If it ain't broke, don't fix it" philosophy.

Imad has excellent line and length and is difficult to hit. Bowling him from over 30 onwards where players will be trying to attack him, rather then just nudge him away for singles and wait for a bad to hit to the boundary will cause us to win matches due to his line and length.

You don't nessarily need swing and excellent spin to be a great bowler. Yes it certainly helps but excellent line and length more often then not helps you win games. Wasim akram wouldn't have been a cricket legend if all he knew how to do was swing but had zero line and length, he was good because he bowled perfect line and length, that coupled with lethal swing made him unplayable.

Imad is an important death overs bowler and an important batsmen, if you don't wanna play imad and move on from him, fine. But then don't give people like chacha or faheem, an imad discount a free ride in the team.
 
Imad Wasim chats to Saj about missing out on selection for the Afghanistan series and Asia Cup, his hopes of an ODI recall, Pakistan's chances at the Asia Cup and World Cup, looks forward to the CPL, his experience of MLC, Mohammad Amir's continued retirement from international cricket and more.

Imad wasim's current form in league cricket makes him a contender for a world cup squad but baber azam considers nawaz his match winner and he did proved him right in recent past as well as against Afghanistan. So imad wasim's inclusion in world cup squad is a bit shady in this scenerio.
 
As per the conditions of sri lankan wickets Imad wasim can become a lethal asset there with bat and ball... He must have been picked for the Asia Cup.
Yes. You gotta include imad wasim in your squad in such conditions. I agree
 
still trying to make sense why they picked faheem ashraf over imad wasim, look at his recent performances in CPL he should have been included in the squad.
 
Imad should have certainly been in the squad for a subcontinental tournament, but I wouldn't put him in the side over Nawaz or Shadab.

He can only bowl in the powerplay, and we have 3 fantastic pacers who own the powerplay.
 
Poor stuff from Imad, domestic player in Brooks is making him look like a fool.
 
Don't think so.

I think Aussies or England may win it. Flat pitches should suit England.
 
Imad Wasim is showing some fine form at the CPL right now. He's picking up wickets, hitting crucial runs and is leading the Total Impact stats. Always has been a motivated player with a never say die attitude. He seems like the obvious #6 for the WC
 
Came in at #4 for the Jamaica Tallawahs vs Guyana Amazon Warriors, managing only to play a pedestrian innings scoring 18 off 26 balls
 
There are many competitive teams participating in this world cup. Many players has plenty of experience on indian pitches and conditions because of their stints in IPL. It will not be an easy task for Pakistan to defeat inform teams such as England, Australia and India.
After taking humiliating defeat by hands on India in Asia cup. Pakistani players are mentally under pressure now. Especially Playing against India in Ahmedabad cricket stadium infront of millions of Indians chanting for India
 
He should replace Shadab in the squad.
No i think he must get replaced with Muhammad Nawaz as we cant keep him into the side knowing that he cant spin the ball, he cant bat either, no impact created in cricket for Pakistan in last 2 years so dropping Nawaz for Immad is quite justified.

Shadab is a gun fielder and good with the bat too all he need is just little confidence, i am sure he will do better on Indian spinning tracks as compare to Srilanka.
 
No i think he must get replaced with Muhammad Nawaz as we cant keep him into the side knowing that he cant spin the ball, he cant bat either, no impact created in cricket for Pakistan in last 2 years so dropping Nawaz for Immad is quite justified.

Shadab is a gun fielder and good with the bat too all he need is just little confidence, i am sure he will do better on Indian spinning tracks as compare to Srilanka.
Shadab is a brilliant fielder but his batting strike rate of 83 isn't good enough as a lower order hitter.Shadab hasn't played a Innings like Nawaz did against India pluss nawaz can open the bowling and so can imad and due to Naseem being injured that's another option.
 
Ultimately his lack of matches in the 50 over format cost him a place in the World Cup squad.

If he had been playing this format and performing he would have been selected.
 
Every PCT fan would like this to happen but at the moment it looks very unlikely. This would surely be a dream final for everyone in Pakistan but the chances of this happening are almost none.
 
Its possible though we were down and out before 2017 Champions Trophy and we managed to make a strong comeback. Sort of similar situation here.
Although Imad Wasim's inclusion would have been critical, considering his form in CPL.
 
On paper the team in 2017 was weaker than the team we have now. But we had a far smarter captain. Can we do it with the captain we have right now? No, I don't think so. I'd love to be proven wrong but I think Babar is too passive and too fearful even if his body language isn't that.
 
Will there be a repeat? I would love it of course, but who knows?

One thing is for sure, the CT17 final will be in the back of every Indian player and fan. Never will India, or the RoW write off Pakistan again.

I do not care what an Indian fan says, CT17 will always haunt them, for decades to come.
 
On paper the team in 2017 was weaker than the team we have now. But we had a far smarter captain. Can we do it with the captain we have right now? No, I don't think so. I'd love to be proven wrong but I think Babar is too passive and too fearful even if his body language isn't that.
That is not true.

Azhar Ali in 2017 wasn't as consistent as imam but he doesn't get stuck at 80 sr forever and doesn't need fakhar hand holding, When fakhar Accelerated, Azhar kept up the pace with fakhar and pakistan were consistently going at 7 runs per over with these 2 at the crease.

Fakhar in 2017 was 100x the player he is now.

Our middle order composed of Hafeez, malik, Haris sohail, sarfraz, inad waseem is 100x superior then our current middle order of rizwan, Agha/Saud, chacha, Nawaz and Shadab.

Nawaz and shadab are useless against quality bowling and wouldn't do anything that pur 20q7 middle order were able to do to India in the final.

Rizwan like imam is perpetually stuck at 110 and we need a 140sr player at the back end, something saud was able to do, and rizwan can't.

The whole middle order is riding on saud and chacha saving the game, while rizwan and babar and imam selfishly go on their merry way and shoot us in the foot.

Abdullah is now being preferred over fakhar meaning expect a 35 for 0 target every game.


Agha is a non factor with both the bat and ball.


In terms of bowling amir was peak unplayable in 2017 and hasan Ali is 100x the bowler in 2017 then he is now. Junaid was a has been but far far superior to current hasan Ali or waseem.

Our spin bowling was also extremely strong with shadab also being 100x the bowler then he is now.

We had a stronger top order, stronger middle order, stronger tail, stronger spin department and slightly stronger fast bowling.

Only thing our 2023 team had over our 2017 team was fast bowling but with naseem gone, all depends on haris and shaheen, and with haris forced to bowl put of position then RIP.
 
So according to Imad, We lose badly in the first game to nedtherlands and then just beat every team in the tournament not even losing once?

Cause in CT, we lost badly first game and then didn't lose a single game from their on out.

Highly doubt that's happening bro.
 
Let's be honest, India at this moment look good for the final, whereas Pakistan still have some uncertainty over their starting XI and question marks over the form of several players.

We seem to go into every major tournament without knowing our best XI and sometimes stumble across our strongest XI.
 
Let's be honest, India at this moment look good for the final, whereas Pakistan still have some uncertainty over their starting XI and question marks over the form of several players.

We seem to go into every major tournament without knowing our best XI and sometimes stumble across our strongest XI.
That is indeed Pakistan cricket.

Expecting the unexpected
 
There has been no final but 2017 champions trophy final in the history of cricket.
 
Will there be a repeat? I would love it of course, but who knows?

One thing is for sure, the CT17 final will be in the back of every Indian player and fan. Never will India, or the RoW write off Pakistan again.

I do not care what an Indian fan says, CT17 will always haunt them, for decades to come.
This just shows how little pakistan has won in the last decade or so. Like we used to latch on little wins 90s and harp for ages, the hero cup, sachin's desert storm in Sharjah, the Great escape in nastiest final.. those moments though great were remembered for way too long . World has moved ahead but pakistan has just regressed
 
Pakistan will need to beat most of the big teams to qualify for the semi-finals.

Probably 4 out of India, Australia, S Africa, NZ and England.
 
Back
Top