Mamoon
ATG
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2012
- Runs
- 107,380
- Post of the Week
- 12
Kohli was scoring a 200 almost every home series when he was Babar’s age.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Kohli was scoring a 200 almost every home series when he was Babar’s age.
got cleaned up by Robinson!
Most batters would have got out to the Babar ball today. Robinson is a quality bowler who averages under 20 in Test cricket, and that was a beautiful reverse inswinging delivery.
Kohli wouldn't. He would know he has to keep his defence tight and he needed to be on the watch for a reverse swinging in swinger with the old ball.
You have to be the most biased poster here. The funny thing is unlike Mamoon who does it on purpose to post silly things you seem to be very serious about your posts.
Kohli wouldn't. He would know he has to keep his defence tight and he needed to be on the watch for a reverse swinging in swinger with the old ball.
I am. Kohli dominated most bowling attacks at home. He would not bowled through the gate like a school boy at home against Olie Robinson.
Babar has been treated like a prince and he's now content with mediocre performances
I am. Kohli dominated most bowling attacks at home. He would not bowled through the gate like a school boy at home against Olie Robinson.
Babar has been treated like a prince and he's now content with mediocre performances
- Outbatted Smith in a test series with Australia having the far better bowling attack.
- Outbatting Root in a test series with England having the far better bowling attack.
- Will Outbat Kane in a test series with New Zealand having the far better bowling attack, InshaAllah.
- Would outbat Kohli in a test series despite India having the far better bowling attack.
Let's not even bring LOs into the picture.
However, according to the critics, he still won't be as good as the awkwardly titled "Fab Four".
In reality, Babar is better than any of them were at his age. He's only going to get better while these guys are all slowing down and getting ducks against the West Indies and losing series to Bangladesh, lmao.
Babar scored a 100 and a 96~ against cummins starc hazlewood in their den. Secondly he has 2 overseas hundreds not one. Thirdly Babar has only gotten one series in sa and nz both when he was still young in his career and had not found his feet in the format. Virat in his first England tour was an epic flop and only 4 years later did he produce that 600 series. Babar has gotten limited opportunities in England and has so far been decent but slightly disappointing.got cleaned up by Robinson!
It's laughable to see some armchair experts trying to make him look better than kohli was at some stage LoL.
When Kohli was 24, he scored a century & a 96 against prime Steyn&Co in South Africa and scored 4 centuries in one series in Australia!
4 years later when he was around 28, he outscored Both South Africa and England players in their own backyard with a 150 in SA and 600 in England whereas babar has gone past those years and already 28, with no notable performance in SENA!
No one in their right mind would call someone with a whopping number of "one" overseas test century in 7 years of career as best in the world!
Babar is possibly the best bat in the last 2-3 years. But he is not daylight ahead of others or by far the best. He is the best because then fab 4 have waned and the next gen haven’t delivered yet. Even then he is only the best in ODIs. He is bang average in T20s and good in Tests. But there are better test batsmen than him.
It is quite simple.
Babar Azam is definitely the best all format batter in the world as of now.
The fab four has declined, some of them don't play LOIs and some are not good enough in t20s, also no one else from the current generation has delivered.
So Babar is the best as of now, but the standards are too low these days.
Joe Root is better batter in Test than Babar.
On the flattest Australian wickets imaginable. Even Yasir Shah got a ton there.Babar scored a 100 and a 96~ against cummins starc hazlewood in their den
Joe Root is better batter in Test than Babar.
This is nonsense.
Kohli in Tests isn’t even that good anymore anyway.
On the flattest Australian wickets imaginable. Even Yasir Shah got a ton there.
Lets wait for the tests to start after his return to form. Shouldn't we?
Perfect answer. The way he is going to be out will be considered the worst.
The reality is he played a very fine innings here.
Babar scored a 100 and a 96~ against cummins starc hazlewood in their den. Secondly he has 2 overseas hundreds not one. Thirdly Babar has only gotten one series in sa and nz both when he was still young in his career and had not found his feet in the format. Virat in his first England tour was an epic flop and only 4 years later did he produce that 600 series. Babar has gotten limited opportunities in England and has so far been decent but slightly disappointing.
In srilanka. As for the Australia series, yes the wickets were pretty flat but they weren't absolute roads. The Pakistan attack back then was a joke a young shaheen, a 17 yo naseem, trundler abbas and yasir shah who even part timers out preform in sena. Other than Babar rizwan and a fluke innings by yasir no other pak batsmen stepped upWhen did he score his second overseas century? And in which country? Yes Virat flopped in that tour but in his second tour he outperformed everyone by a country miles like the second best in that series was 349 compared to his 600. It's not like Babar didn't fail in his first tour either. He also epicly failed in his first Australian tour with a total of 69 in 6 innings combined and performed well in his second tour on pitches where Warner made 300s, 200s for fun and Yasir Shah did well as good as babar with the bat.
Babar is such a coward personality. He brought Abrar too late when England already heading towards big lead.
Hey genius, I agree that most often Babar fails when his team needs a century from him.Classic Babar. Plays his pretty shots, gets to 75 and just when the team desperately needs him to push on for a century to keep us in the series - he then gets out.
Most of the Pakistani awaam are obsessed with style over substance. If you score important runs but look ungainly (Younis Khan) then you won't get the same hype as someone who scores soft runs but look aesthetically pleasing in the process (M Yousuf/Babar).
Lets wait for the tests to start after his return to form. Shouldn't we?
I had to mention it because big players rarely get cleaned up in home conditions and also it looks like England have used Robinson as part time in this match. He didn't even bowl a over in this inning till that point, as soon as he came to bowl he cleaned him up!.
Babar's inning looks fine but actually he scored most of them against leach, root, and Jack that's it. Anderson, wood only bowled 5 overs and conceded 10 (Robinson didn't even bowl) when he got out.
King of soft runs in all formats.
And what has this to do with the thread?
Babar is the best batsman in the world in company of Root and maybe Smith over the past 2/3 years.
You will have to live with it.
Babar is the best batsman in the world in the same delusional world where:
- Naseem is the best young fast bowler in the world
- Rauf is a world class fast bowler
- Shadab is the best spinner & all-rounder in the world
- Rizwan is the best wicket-keeper batsman in the world
Such a mystery that in spite of having so many best in the worlds, Pakistan keeps losing in all formats.
Babar needs to start delivering in tests. He needs an iconic innings in test. Something like chasing and leading in the 4th innings of this test.
Innings against SriLankan team with no named spinners and pacers don't count as classics.If his innings in Sri Lanka wasn't good enough for you, not many will be.
And his 196 was also tremendous.
If his innings in Sri Lanka wasn't good enough for you, not many will be.
And his 196 was also tremendous.
If his innings in Sri Lanka wasn't good enough for you, not many will be.
And his 196 was also tremendous.
There is one real king and his name is Virat Kohli .all other are fake king lol
Again a useless post in this thread.
Name better batsman from the start of the decade.
Babar is a just a “very good” batsman by international standards, every team has several batsmen of his caliber.
He gets so much adulation & attention in Pakistan because Pakistan is the worst & least talented batting country ever.
When you go from batsmen like Hafeez, Malik, Umar Akmal, Nasir Jamshed, Shehzad, Maqsood etc. to Babar, he is obviously going to look like Don Bradman in comparison.
There is one real king and his name is Virat Kohli .all other are fake king lol
Babar will not even get a chance in top 4 teams. Typical over-hyped player.
There are 3-4 players like Babar in every top country, but they are not surrounded by minnow batsmen so they don’t get the opportunity to be in the limelight & given “king” status by their supporters.
Strange no one is ranked 3rd in Test and 1st in ODI's.
Babar is without context the best ODI batter in the world, and also one of the top 5 test batters going in the world. Hence the best all format batter in the world.
Unfortunately for you, ICC isn't listening to you and they keep having Babar as the top ranked player in the world.
That is because not all of them are even in the team & they have to share runs with other batsmen. Someone like Iyer who is at the same level as Babar has played very little cricket in comparison because he has so much competition.
Players like Ishan Kishan & Gill are not first choice for India.
Labuschagne can easily surpass Babar as an ODI number 3 & T20 opener but again, he has too much competition.
Joe Root would average 50+ as T20 opener playing selfish tuk tuk like Babar does.
I can go on forever. The list is never ending. Babar’s rankings are not just because he is very good but also because he has been given a lot of opportunities & leverage because of the lack of competition.
If Babar was in any other major country, he would have been played less than 50% of the matches he has played for Pakistan so far.
Again no logic in your comments. Your lack of it is something you need to worry with such a big IQ. You may have to do another test to see if it has not lessen.
Let alone those not playing. Talk about those playing. There is rotation in ODI's and T20's. But why does India's midle order batsman who play regularly, Pujara, Kohli not as good as Babar in Test cricket? Both of them averages in the 20's in this decade?
Again no logic in your comments. Your lack of it is something you need to worry with such a big IQ. You may have to do another test to see if it has not lessen.
Let alone those not playing. Talk about those playing. There is rotation in ODI's and T20's. But why does India's midle order batsman who play regularly, Pujara, Kohli not as good as Babar in Test cricket? Both of them averages in the 20's in this decade?
“Decade”![]()
We are in the second year of the “decade”. You are making it sound as Babar has been doing better than them for the last 7-8 years.
Clever use of words, but these things don’t get past me. Next time when Babar gets a duck, you can state that he missed his century by 100 runs only, sounds better than saying he got out for 0.
Kohli & Pujara haven’t done well in Test cricket over the last 2 years, but Babar would do well to have 50% of the Test career Kohli has had & 75% of the Test career Pujara has had.
Strange no one is ranked 3rd in Test and 1st in ODI's.
Babar is without context the best ODI batter in the world, and also one of the top 5 test batters going in the world. Hence the best all format batter in the world.
Unfortunately for you, ICC isn't listening to you and they keep having Babar as the top ranked player in the world.
Babar Azam should learn from Pant on how to dominate other teams in home conditions.![]()
I agree with Babar being #1 in ODI.
He is not even in the top 20 in T20Is.
I don’t think he is too 5 in tests. Top 10 sure. I can think of Labuschange, Root, Williamson, Smith who have been better than him. So at most 5, but then arguably Pant, Bairstow and Karunaratne also can claim to have achieved more than Babar in test cricket.
Pant dominated in SENA as well, not just at home.Babar Azam should learn from Pant on how to dominate other teams in home conditions.![]()
Wrong.And you should learn cricket.
Pant and Babar are completely different type of batsman. The likes of Tendulkar, Ponting, Smith, Root, Babar don't play or dominate like Pant does. They are classical test batsmen.
I am not saying Babar is in the league of those batsmen. Just giving you example that you finally may understand something.
“Decade”![]()
We are in the second year of the “decade”. You are making it sound as Babar has been doing better than them for the last 7-8 years.
Clever use of words, but these things don’t get past me. Next time when Babar gets a duck, you can state that he missed his century by 100 runs only, sounds better than saying he got out for 0.
Kohli & Pujara haven’t done well in Test cricket over the last 2 years, but Babar would do well to have 50% of the Test career Kohli has had & 75% of the Test career Pujara has had.
You are right but the majority of 2020 was washed up by covid, there wasn't much cricket.I agree with your sentiments about Babar but bro 2022 is not the second year of the decade.
2020 - 1st
2021 - 2nd
2022 - 3rd