What's new

[VIDEOS] Is Jimmy Anderson an all-time great?

Is James Anderson an ATG?


  • Total voters
    79
He is definitely an all time great bowler. No ordinary bowler can have this many wickets.
In my top SEAM bowling list in the past couple of decades, He is among the very best in setting up a batsman - I would rate Asif the best in this class and then Steyn and Anderson. In English conditions, He is extremely menacing.
 
On the question about how one qualifies for status of ATG, I have this feeling that in two or three decades time when the standard of international test cricket is equivalent to that of Zimbabwe's domestic cricket -- which can happen, who would have thought West Indies team of 80s would become such an embarrassment within 15-20 years and continuing - and in that era of all time low standard of mediocre test cricket , a batsman will arise of the calibre of Mohammed Hafeez and go on.and score 10000 runs, more 300s than Bradman, and our future generations will be discussing on PakPassion if the Hafeez of their era was greater than Bradman and Sobers, never mind just being a mere ATG. :)
 
He has roughly 20% of his international wickets in one home ground.
 
He has roughly 20% of his international wickets in one home ground.

Dennis Lillee took 23 percent of his wickets at the MCG, Richard Hadlee took 18 percent of his wickets in Christchurch, Curtly Ambrose took 16 percent of his wickets in Trinidad, while Dale Steyn has also taken 16 percent of his wickets at Newlands. I don't think this argument applied to them.
 
Last edited:
He has roughly 20% of his international wickets in one home ground.

So? If he is playing at lords then he you will drop him cause he has alot wickets there? or you will tell him to under perform cause you already have had alot wickets on same ground (which is greatest cricketing ground). What about batsman scoring many runs in same ground?
 
Dennis Lillee took 23 percent of his wickets at the MCG, Richard Hadlee took 18 percent of his wickets in Christchurch, Curtly Ambrose took 16 percent of his wickets in Trinidad, while Dale Steyn has also taken 16 percent of his wickets at Newlands. I don't think this argument applied to them.

So? If he is playing at lords then he you will drop him cause he has alot wickets there? or you will tell him to under perform cause you already have had alot wickets on same ground (which is greatest cricketing ground). What about batsman scoring many runs in same ground?

I won't use it against him. I was simply sharing it in this thread.


On topic, I don't consider him ATG at all. He is comfortably a tier below that.
 
Lol. Just like that ? No reason no rhyme?

Kumble isn't even considered ATG by Indians. Dude's got truckloads of wickets because he played for so long. His longevity suggests he was a very fit player, but his away average implies he was limited in skill. Longevity is only a factor if you have good stats to begin with.
 
21 5-fers at home and 5 5-fers away.

Not sure what to say?? 21 5-fers only at home is a ridiculous number in itself.

On away record, I would argue that England generally plays 4-5 tests away and as a fast bowler, it is very hard to maintain a sub-25 average in alien conditions when you are playing that big a series and more so, when your team is close to getting hammered there.

I remember the 2017 Ashes when Broad started really well in first three innings but England were all under sea and hence over a course of 5 tests, he completely lost motivation after that and ended up getting hammered in other tests.
 
Cook at 33 fails in 90% of his innings and drops every second catch at first slip. Clearly, he is on his last legs and his reflexes are waning. If he hangs around till 42, which is another 9 years, he won't score a run and won't catch a cold.

I find it ironic that you are calling Anderson's performance in Ashes 2010/11 as cherry picking, because the only cherry picking is dismissing his fantastic series because he took X number of lower-order/tail wickets. That is what you call cherry picking.

He took 24 wickets in the series and no other bowler came anywhere close to his tally. It was one of the most dominant performances by a visiting team in Australia in a long, long time, and he played a starring role. There is no point in weighing down his contribution because clearly, England would not have inflicted three innings defeats in five Tests without his bowling.

If we sort bowlers based on the percentage of lower-order/tail wickets that they have taken in their career, someone like Akram would feature very high in the last and Anderson would feature very low. In fact, he has often struggled to clean up the tail because of his lack of space. However, obviously this does not mean that he is as good as Akram - he is not even close - but a merely very good bowler cannot trouble some of the best batsmen of all time the way Anderson has.

People very easily dismiss his and Broad's success because they play a lot of matches in good conditions. It takes a lot of skill, talent and determination to bowl at the age of 36 the way Anderson is bowling. For example, look at the best bowler of his era (Steyn). He is the same age as Anderson, has less far less international matches but these days he cannot bowl 20 overs without getting injured.

Every player wants to have a long career, but longevity is not everyone's cup of tea, and those who achieve longevity deserves to be recognized for it.

Anderson is not as good as Marshall, McGrath, Ambrose, Imran, Akram, Donald etc., but he is not just merely a very good bowler.

I think you misunderstood my point about Anderson taking 14 lower order/tailender wickets in 2010. I was replying to in the context of you saying that that was one of the best performances by an overseas bowler in Australia EVER. Surely someone who takes ~60% of his wickets in that series of lower order/tailenders cannot be classified as one of the best performances ever in Australia. If that is so, then it is an insult to the performances of Curtly Ambrose and Richard Hadlee in Australia. I'm in no way demeaning Anderson but his 24 wickets in 2010 does not hold a candle to some of the performances we've seen in Australia before. More than Anderson, it was Cook and Trott who won the series for England. The wickets were well shared between Anderson, Tremlett, Finn and Swann.

The point that you are making is Anderson is a great bowler. And I have never disputed that fact. I too believe that he is a great bowler who is doing great things. But the point of discussion was is Anderson an ATG? And that is where I think he doesn't fall into that league irrespective whether he takes 550 wickets or 650 wickets. His pathetic away record stands in his way of achieving an ATG status. He's an ATG in England for sure.

Longevity needs to be recognized and appreciated for sure but we shouldn't reward longevity with giving an ATG title to a bowler who does not deserve it.
 
On the question about how one qualifies for status of ATG, I have this feeling that in two or three decades time when the standard of international test cricket is equivalent to that of Zimbabwe's domestic cricket -- which can happen, who would have thought West Indies team of 80s would become such an embarrassment within 15-20 years and continuing - and in that era of all time low standard of mediocre test cricket , a batsman will arise of the calibre of Mohammed Hafeez and go on.and score 10000 runs, more 300s than Bradman, and our future generations will be discussing on PakPassion if the Hafeez of their era was greater than Bradman and Sobers, never mind just being a mere ATG. :)

Alas we live in a time when the majority here think he is an ATG...
Even people willing to say that anyone who thinks otherwise has probably never even picked up a cricket ball..

Anyway, your post is spot on.
 
Alas we live in a time when the majority here think he is an ATG...
Even people willing to say that anyone who thinks otherwise has probably never even picked up a cricket ball..

Anyway, your post is spot on.

I said those that continue to disparage his career have probably never picked up a cricket ball.

You are perfectly entitled to think he's not an ATG, that's not a position entirely without merit.
 
He's fast approaching McGrath's record, so he'll probably will go down as an ATG but not quite in the league of McGrath.
 
There have clearly been better bowlers than him, yes that's true. But presently I can't see anyone who is as good as him in the swing department in Test cricket. You don't get 500 test wickets by being mediocre.
 
Right up there with his skills and longevity. I am very impressed with how he has carry himself in 30s, in last few years, he has been at his peak, which is impressive considering he is in mid 30s...

Leaving LOIs was best decision, he has focused on test length, that has helped him being consistent and master his skills even more...This is clue for future bowlers too, there is just too much difference in Test and LOI(specially T20) lengths to be good at both. Bowlers have to pick one or the other...Unfortunately there is not enough money in test for our bowlers to pick test over LOI, in England that decision is not that difficult ATM...
 
He's fast approaching McGrath's record, so he'll probably will go down as an ATG but not quite in the league of McGrath.

Correct. He's nowhere near the level of mcgrarh. He's just a better version of Ravindra Jadeja. Both Anderson and Jadeja r extremely effective under helpful condition but quite average in everywhere else.
 
Last edited:
Great bowler absolutely but for me not in the league of McGrath but then who exactly could be put in the league of McGrath, don't think even Steyn or Ambrose could be compared to Mcgrath.

Ambrose has <21 average with better performances in Australia than McG in WI especially considering the Aussie batters' monstrous averages at home. Plus Ambrose could run through teams alone in a way McG rarely did, his 7 for 1 spell is legendary :bow:
 
James Anderson is only 11 wickets away from overtaking Glenn McGrath's haul of 563 Test wickets and becoming the leading seamer in the history of cricket, not that he is focusing on the mark.

In an exclusive interview with Anderson and Stuart Broad ahead of the third Test against India at Trent Bridge - which you can watch live on Sky Sports Cricket from 10am on Saturday - Anderson said he cares more about the team's success than individual honours.

"I've not really thought about it [overtaking McGrath], to be honest," said Anderson. "I really try to focus on what I can actually effect now - the game that we are about to play, the spell that I am about to bowl. The wickets kind of take care of themselves if you bowl well enough for a long period of time.

"Stuart and I have had a similar mindset throughout. We try to help each other through games and, with the rest of the bowling attack, try to bowl well as a group, to help the team win a game of cricket. That's all we really focus on and if you ever take your focuses away from that your performances aren't so good.

Who was younger on Test debut? Who's had more five-wicket spells? Try and separate England's star seamers in our latest quiz!

"I think the fact that I've played quite a long time is probably the thing that I'm most proud of - putting in the hard work to stay on the field fitness-wise and then putting in the performances to stay in the team. Being a part of some great England teams over the years is something I'll probably remember more than some of the individual wickets."

Broad, who himself moved up to 424 Test strikes with England's thumping innings win over India in the second Test at Lord's, echoed Anderson's sentiments.

"Jimmy hit the nail on the head. I don't think anyone in the England changing room really puts too much emphasis or focus on individual numbers," Broad added. "The things you remember as a player are the moments in changing rooms when you win a Test.

"At Lord's last week we just sat there and time disappeared chatting about the game, talking and watching a bit of telly. It's those moments that you remember.

"Whether you fell one wicket short or went 100 past McGrath, I don't think you'd sit there at the end and be overly disappointed or delighted; it's more the brilliant spells you might remember or the moments of winning Test matches and Test series that you take with you when you finish."

http://www.skysports.com/cricket/ne...not-focusing-on-breaking-glenn-mcgrath-record
 
Seems like he may need to wait a bit - not much happening in this Test
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">James Anderson breaks the record for the most wickets by a pace bowler in the history of Test cricket <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/ENGvIND?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#ENGvIND</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Cricket?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Cricket</a></p>— Saj Sadiq (@Saj_PakPassion) <a href="https://twitter.com/Saj_PakPassion/status/1039551201900208129?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 11, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Dm06Rd8WsAABMHa.jpg
 
He will also get to 600 wickets before retirement.


Think by next year Ashes, he should get to 600 landmark.
 
If Jimmy Anderson is an ATG then Ravichandran Ashwin will also likely become an ATG in another 5 years.

Anderson:

home avg - 23.6
away avg - 32.5

Ashwin :

home avg - 22.8
away avg - 31.8


We'll have to see how many people think Ashwin is worthy of an ATG tag then.
 
ATGs do not look complete toothless when there are no clouds. Funny to see Anderson picking up easy last wicket and it was Rashid and Curran who took the match winning wickets.
 
Not an ATG but a mighty fine bowler

Youve got to have great skill, fitness, determination and luck to play so many tests and take so many wickets

Hats off to him. I dont think any pacer will ever break this record
 
If Jimmy Anderson is an ATG then Ravichandran Ashwin will also likely become an ATG in another 5 years.

Anderson:

home avg - 23.6
away avg - 32.5

Ashwin :

home avg - 22.8
away avg - 31.8


We'll have to see how many people think Ashwin is worthy of an ATG tag then.

If Ashwin also manages to become the highest wicket taker in his craft (spin bowling) like Jimmy has in fast bowling then you are right that Ashwin will surely be counted as an ATG
 
If Jimmy Anderson is an ATG then Ravichandran Ashwin will also likely become an ATG in another 5 years.

Anderson:

home avg - 23.6
away avg - 32.5

Ashwin :

home avg - 22.8
away avg - 31.8


We'll have to see how many people think Ashwin is worthy of an ATG tag then.

Jimmy had one great series in Australia 2010 where he took 24 wickets in the series and one great series in India as well in 2012. He also has done very well overall in UAE.

While for Ashwin,it comes down to series like West Indies and Sri Lanka.

A better analogy would be Anderson vs Kumble as Kumble has still some notable series performance against top teams in non-helpful conditions.

Ashwin's stats flatter him as a test bowler.
 
If Ashwin also manages to become the highest wicket taker in his craft (spin bowling) like Jimmy has in fast bowling then you are right that Ashwin will surely be counted as an ATG

This!

Anderson surely is ATG. It must be a super proud moment for Jimmy. Being the no 1 pace bowlers in terms of wicket is amazing. The game has seen so many greats and to top that list hats of.
 
Jimmy had one great series in Australia 2010 where he took 24 wickets in the series and one great series in India as well in 2012. He also has done very well overall in UAE.

While for Ashwin,it comes down to series like West Indies and Sri Lanka.

A better analogy would be Anderson vs Kumble as Kumble has still some notable series performance against top teams in non-helpful conditions.

Ashwin's stats flatter him as a test bowler.

No doubt. But the truth is that even Anderson has only had 2 great overseas tour in his career. And even then I will be wary of labelling him as an ATG.

Obviously Ashwin will also have to have a couple of great tours overseas.

But even an ATG candidate like Jimmy averages an astonishing 40 in South Africa. Add to that his average of 33 in New Zealand and avg of 35 in Australia means he has mostly done very poorly in all overseas tours that are best suited to pacers. So Jimmy's stats also flatter him to a large extent.
 
Last edited:
Jimmy had one great series in Australia 2010 where he took 24 wickets in the series and one great series in India as well in 2012. He also has done very well overall in UAE.

While for Ashwin,it comes down to series like West Indies and Sri Lanka.

A better analogy would be Anderson vs Kumble as Kumble has still some notable series performance against top teams in non-helpful conditions.

Ashwin's stats flatter him as a test bowler.

For the record I don't think Ashwin is ATG material unless he changes dramatically in the future.
 
Charming little tidbit that I came across on cricinfo, the sort of statistical éclat that you can only witness in this great game of ours.

Glenn McGrath's 563rd and final test wicket 11 years ago at the SCG was one James Anderson, whose test record at the time read:

Played - 16
Wickets - 46
Average - 38.39
Strike Rate - 60.4
Best Bowling - 5/73 vs Zimbabwe at Lord's 2003

Who could have imagined at that moment in time as Mike Hussey took the catch which practically condemned England to a 5-nil Ashes defeat that the number 11 trudging off the SCG with an ordinary test record would one day overtake McGrath to become the most successful fast bowler in test history ? Anderson is a credit to all those enlightened folk that work hard and dream big.

You just have to love the randomness of it all.
 
Akram the greatest: McGrath

While expressing his views on Anderson surpassing his tally of Test wickets, McGrath said

"Being a fast bowler is the toughest part of the game and injuries do play a part. To think that Jimmy's played for so long and continued at the top of his game shows his work ethic, his physical and mental strength and everything else that goes into it.

"When it comes to the art of swing bowling, there is no-one better. I think of somebody like Wasim Akram, who is one of the greats of all time, and he could just do anything with a ball.

"Wasim swung it both ways, was a left-armer and had power through the crease."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'The next bar is 600' – McGrath backs Anderson to go the extra mile

Former Australia fast bowler Glenn McGrath believes that England's James Anderson, who broke the record for the most wickets by a fast bowler in Tests at The Oval, still has "a little bit left in the tank".

Anderson went past McGrath's tally of 563 Test wickets on Tuesday, 11 September when he dismissed India's Mohammed Shami on the fifth day of the fifth and final Test at The Oval. Shami's was the last wicket to fall as England won the game by 118 runs and pocketed the five-match series 4-1.

Only three spinners – Anil Kumble (619), Shane Warne (708) and Muttiah Muralitharan (800) – are now ahead of the English swing king in the overall list.

McGrath has backed Anderson to breach the 600-wicket mark, which is only 36 wickets away. "Just to see Jimmy now, he looks fit and keen and running around, it depends on what he wants to do. He has gone past me and I think the next bar is 600 Test wickets," McGrath told BBC.

"If he can get to 600 Test wickets, that's an incredible effort, and if he is still got that drive, that passion to get yourself up, to put the hard work in off the field to carry you through on the field... if he has still got that desire, then he can play as long as he wants."

McGrath finished his career with 563 wickets from 124 Tests, the last of which he played against England in 2007, and coincidentally, his last Test wicket was none other than Anderson. Anderson is 36 now, but McGrath believes that the Englishman has more to offer, and Kumble's tally should be the next target for him.

"I think he's still got little bit left in the tank yet," McGrath said. "I'd like to see Jimmy go and get 600 and then whether he wants to try and knock off one of these dodgy spinners that are still at the top of the tree. I think Kumble is about 619. That's within range."

https://www.icc-cricket.com/news/847249
 
Surely he is an ATG with those numbers?

Above graph shows that he sits comfortably amongst the rest.
 
Surely he is up there. I mean which bowler has played 150 tests in their career?

We talk so much about Cook's longevity who is a batsmen and he has played 160 odd tests. Here, we have a fast bowler with 143 tests and is guaranteed to get past 150 test mark and even 600 wickets landmark as well.

Also, it is not like he has been carried just because of no other option available but he is still England's best fast bowler going around and one of the best in the world as well.
 
The argument that is against him is his away record. But still its not like he is mediocre away. He had his moments in Australia and Asia(India+ UAE).
 
The argument that is against him is his away record. But still its not like he is mediocre away. He had his moments in Australia and Asia(India+ UAE).

Also in WI. I think he will do well in SL thus winter.

His away numbers have been improving slowly after an awful start. Since 2010, when he learned reverse swing from Asif, he has averaged 30 away. Not great, but he does a decent job.
 
The criterion to become ATG fast bowler is to beat the already ATG batsman Virat Kohli's outside and inside edges. Anderson has done it considerably well hence ATG.

At present, can anyone point a bowler better than him to disturb quality batsmen with the authority he hold? Any trundler csn swing and bounce in English conditions. But haven't seen any bowler doing it just like Anderson do. Consistently beating world's best batsman. How many runs Kohli scored against Anderson? Once settled, batting is like an art for VK. Anderson was the only bowler to break Kohli's rhythm no matter how settled Virat Kohli is. Besides the greatest batsman shouldn't have cared any other bowler than Anderson with eyes so wide open.
 
Fine player, and one of the greats.

You might get through a few all time test XIs before he occupies one of the 3 seamer spots in a traditional test line-up though.

Even from the 90s onwards there are a few I'd have before him - Waqar, Steyn, Wasim, Donald, Mcgrath, Ambrose, Akhtar.

There is still a case perhaps even for Pollock/Johnson/Walsh to be picked ahead...due to small sample size did not include Harris, Asif or Bond either.
 
Charming little tidbit that I came across on cricinfo, the sort of statistical éclat that you can only witness in this great game of ours.

Glenn McGrath's 563rd and final test wicket 11 years ago at the SCG was one James Anderson, whose test record at the time read:

Played - 16
Wickets - 46
Average - 38.39
Strike Rate - 60.4
Best Bowling - 5/73 vs Zimbabwe at Lord's 2003

Who could have imagined at that moment in time as Mike Hussey took the catch which practically condemned England to a 5-nil Ashes defeat that the number 11 trudging off the SCG with an ordinary test record would one day overtake McGrath to become the most successful fast bowler in test history ? Anderson is a credit to all those enlightened folk that work hard and dream big.

You just have to love the randomness of it all.

Interesting and wonderful to know indeed.

He didn't even have 3 wickets per game at that time.

Just goes to show how massive transformations happen over time.

Not a soul could have predicted this to happen.
 
No, he is not. Anderson, like Cook, is a great player but just because these guys have played an insane number of tests and accumulated an insane amount of runs/wickets, does not mean that they have the QUALITY that is needed for one to be an ATG.
 
I don't consider him an ATG. To be an ATG, you need to be ATG in home conditions but more importantly in away conditions too, he more than fulfils the first criteria but the second I think he falls short off the mark.
 
Let’s be honest cookey and Anderson have benefited from the fact that England play a lot of tests. They have created records in a decade whereas other players from previous eras would ve had to play 15 years to accumulate 100 tests and numerous side games county games and Odis to boot

Yes they have had great fitness but they have also been managed superbly with central contracts and consistent selection Not playing Odis and County cricket This benefit wasnt available to England players before this era who came to test duty underpaid, injured/ overworked and unsure of their position with all the chopping and changing in the team

Yes it should be a factor but Quantity solely shouldn’t be a gage of someone’s greatness
 
James Anderson: McGrath and Steyn are better than me

James Anderson has his sights set on 600 Test wickets, but doesn’t think that that will make him the best fast bowler of all time.

Writing in a column for Fox Sports after becoming Test cricket’s leading wicket-taker among quick bowlers, Anderson praised the man he overtook, Glenn McGrath, as being “much better” than him.

“He was a much better bowler than me,” Anderson said. “This is not false modesty. I may have gone past his wicket tally but I honestly believe McGrath’s bounce, relentless accuracy, aggression and ability to move the ball made him superior. He had everything.

“Of the modern era, I’d happily tip my hat towards Dale Steyn. With his express pace, control and swing, he’s better than me, too.”

Anderson said he learned from McGrath as well as admiring him. “I also loved McGrath’s attitude. He had plenty of a snarl on the field — a bit like me, I suppose — and was super-competitive. He hated giving away runs or not taking wickets. We’ve shared a beer a few times and he’s a cracking fellow. I listened to the way he prepared for games and it really helped me.

“I heard him say once that he practised for when the ball didn’t swing. So if it did swing, it was a bonus. That philosophy has been a big part of my development. You so often see bowlers pick out a lovely new ball from the bag at nets and it looks great when it swings in the air and nips off the seam with batsmen playing and missing. But you have to simulate match situations.

“What about when the ball is 60 overs old, the sun is blazing down, the pitch is flat and there’s not a hint of movement? So, at practice, I often take an old ball that looks like it’s been chewed by a dog and work on variations and aiming for the top of off stump. That’s the quickest way to improve your skills.”

His record having been broken, McGrath suggested Anderson might be the first pace bowler to take 600 wickets in Test cricket. Anderson agreed it was possible, confirming that for the moment he isn’t thinking of retirement.

“McGrath reckons I can go past 600 Test wickets — I’m on 564 — and I don’t see why that is not possible because I feel fit, enthusiastic and surprisingly fresh for a 36-year-old after five Tests in little more than six weeks. But I remember McGrath saying he went into the 2006-07 Ashes in Australia with no plans to retire but, by the end of that series, he knew his time was up.

“Maybe it could happen to me just as suddenly but, right now, I have no plans to follow Cooky into retirement.”

‘Cooky’ is Alastair Cook, England’s record runscorer who retired after the conclusion of his side’s victory in the fifth Test over India, and Anderson paid tribute to his best mate.

“I’m extremely fortunate to have him as a mate,” he said. “He’s so down-to-earth — he’s not on social media, tries to keep a low profile and loves his time on the farm with his family and those lambs. Cooky is someone I look up to for his work ethic and the way he conducts himself. I’ll miss him as a friend and a shoulder to cry on.”

England’s next assignment takes them to Sri Lanka. There has been suggestion, with both Anderson and fellow veteran seamer Stuart Broad having played all seven Tests this summer, that one or both will be rested for that trip, but Anderson poured cold water on the rumour.

“There have been some mutterings about Stuart Broad and me being rested for the Test tour of Sri Lanka later this year,” he said. “I’d be flabbergasted if that happens. We don’t play white-ball cricket so have plenty of time to recover from these five Tests and prepare for Sri Lanka. The Test players don’t fly out until late October. Then we have more than six weeks at home until departing for West Indies in the middle of January for three Tests. Again, plenty of time to recover.”

https://www.icc-cricket.com/news/847969
 
Yes, he is an all-time great bowler. A living legend. Will go down as one of the greats of the game. His haters consist of Yasir and Ashwin fans that go into hiding every time India and Pakistan tour overseas.:jimmy
 
An ATG who averages ~33 in all countries except U.A.E, WI, and ENG?

Check please!
 
No way is he an ATG.

He's done very well with his longevity and is a classy bowler but no way an ATG to be compared with people like McGrath, Ambrose, Wasim etc.
 
A level below ATGs for me as well. He is an average bowler in ODIs as well.
 
His longevity makes him an excellent bowler. His career average, and most importantly his average away from home is enough to show that he isn't in the league of legends like McGrath, Ambrose, Akram, etc.


in Aus - 35.43 (ave); SR - 72

in Ind - 33.46 (ave); SR - 71.5

in NZ - 32.80 (ave); SR - 58.8

in SA - 39.92 (ave); SR - 75.6

in SL - 46.08 (ave); SR - 88.3


Those figures belongs to an ATG of the game? He has been a brilliant bowler for England. But he isn't an ATG, no way.
 
Without a doubt. one of the best swing bowlers. A modern day genius.
 
Would he be in consideration for any all time world XI? Or even a world XI B or C team?

I think that should answer the question.
 
England fast bowler James Anderson will train at the Etihad stadium, Manchester City's home ground, in a bid to recover from the calf injury that sidelined him for the majority of the Ashes series last month.

Anderson had originally sustained the injury while playing for Lancashire in July, before it resurfaced during the first Ashes Test at Edgbaston, forcing him off the field after bowling just four overs. He was subsequently ruled out of the remainder of the series.

Anderson was also ignored for the 15-member squad for the two-Test New Zealand tour, and now aims to return during the four-Test series in South Africa, starting with the Boxing Day Test in Centurion.

Anderson was forced to leave the field after having bowled only four overs in the first session at EdgbastonAnderson was forced to leave the field after having bowled only four overs in the first session at Edgbaston
The 37-year-old will have access to the facilities at the Etihad campus for the next two months, and will be under the supervision of England's head of strength and conditioning Rob Ahmun.

"[Anderson] will be hoping to use the world-class facilities at the Etihad Campus with the England Cricket sports science team over the next two months, leading into the South Africa tour, which starts in December," an ECB spokesman said.

Anderson, the leading wicket-taker among fast bowlers in Tests, was immensely disappointed at having missed the last four games during the Ashes. He is now seeking inspiration from footballer Ryan Giggs, who made a staggering 963 appearances for Manchester United and played till the age of 40.

"It has been absolutely devastating to miss the Ashes series, but I have not thought for one second about retiring," Anderson said. "In fact, I'm going to look into how Ryan Giggs was able to play football at the highest level until he was 40. That's what I'd like to do."


https://www.icc-cricket.com/news/1418043
 
Of course he's not lol. Every single ATG would have to feature in an ATG XI (either A, B or C or D team). Anderson wouldn't fit in any of them or even be taken into consideration.

Spinners can get away with being bad outside home, not pacers. There's way too much competition for that. Anderson wouldn't even be part of 21st century XI let alone all time.
 
England fast bowler James Anderson, who hasn't played a Test since sustaining a calf strain during the first Ashes Test at Edgbaston in August this year, is expected to return for his team's upcoming tour of South Africa.

Anderson was forced off the field after bowling only four overs during the Ashes opener. The 37-year-old was also sidelined for the two New Zealand Tests, the first of which will be played in Mount Maunganui from 22 November.

After having trained at Manchester City's home ground, the Etihad stadium, last month in a bid to recover, Anderson will now be heading for the training camp in Potchefstroom, and if cleared, will feature in the first of the four Tests – the Boxing Day game in Centurion.

"Jimmy is going out to Potchefstroom," Ashley Giles, the managing director of England's men's cricket, told the BBC. "We're hopeful. We think he is on track, which is great. The medical team are happy. The older you get, these things linger longer. We felt no point forcing it for this short tour.

"It will be interesting to see the pitches we play on in South Africa. I think they'll be green, and they'll go for a bowler war and take us on. It's not something I'd take on with Jofra Archer and Jimmy Anderson, but it will be an exciting series."

Mark Wood, Olly Stone and Jamie Overton will be the other bowlers to take part in the camp, which will be under the supervision of Jonathan Trott, Glen Chapple, Neil Killeen and, subject to finalising a deal as bowling consultant, Darren Gough.

England had triumphed 2-1 in the Tests when they last toured South Africa, in 2015-16, and it remains one of their only two overseas wins in the last 11 away series. While they've excelled as a white-ball unit in the period, Giles laid special emphasis on maintaining the right balance across formats and marked the away Ashes win in Australia as a long-term goal, something they haven't done since the 2010-11 triumph under Andrew Strauss.

"Whatever people say, there was definitely more focus on our white-ball teams in the past few years," Giles said. "We're not moving everything to Test cricket, we've got to find a balance on all forms that are important to us. We'll see a more traditional way of playing; playing the long game with ball or bat. Sometimes with ball, you have to stick in, refer to plan A, and if in doubt, go back to plan A.

"That messaging goes into the county system. There was a focus on 2019 and trying to win the World Cup. We've seen the increase in quality of short-form county cricket. We've got this goal - to win in Australia - and we need a system underneath than can produce better players capable of doing it."

https://www.icc-cricket.com/news/1495980
 
No
Coluderson aka Anderson only effective in overcast cloudy gloomy damp home conditions.
He is very ordinary blower in away conditions compare to other fast blowers
 
Not an ATG but a great of the modern era. Arguably The only ATG among bowlers in the modern era has been Dale Steyn in tests with good record all around.
 
Yes, he is, because he is the highest wicket taking fast bowler (Tests) of all time.
 
James Anderson's return from injury could not be more timely for England, who are still unsure about the make-up of their bowling attack as they head into the first Test against South Africa.

But while Jofra Archer and Stuart Broad are still not sure of playing in the match, which starts on Boxing Day, after being laid low with flu, Anderson will be back on the frontline for what will be his 150th Test.

England are expected to field a five-man seam attack, foregoing spin, if all their pacemen are fully fit. However, that situation may need to be reassessed based on the availability of Ben Stokes.

The allrounder's father was admitted to hospital in Johannesburg his condition was described as being "critical" on Tuesday in a statement from the England and Wales Cricket Board.

The 37-year-old Anderson will be the ninth cricketer to reach the 150-Test milestone - joining the likes of Sachin Tendulkar, Steve Waugh and Jacques Kallis - when he makes his return to the England attack for the first time since limping off with a calf injury at the start of the Ashes in August.

"He's looking as good as I've ever seen him," said captain Joe Root.

Anderson had arrived in the country ahead of the majority of the England squad to attend a fast bowlers' camp, underlining his desire to get back into the team.

"It feels like a long time since I've played a competitive game so to get some overs ... was very pleasing," he told reporters.

"There was a bit of rust but that's to be expected having not played for four or five months. I'm just happy to be back out there."

Anderson was only 20 when he made his debut, taking five wickets against Zimbabwe at Lord's in 2003, and last month said he wanted to continue through to the next Ashes series, which will start at the end of 2021 in Australia.

"I still want to do it, that's part of the reason I worked so hard to get back," added England's record wicket taker with 575 Test scalps.

"It's something I love and I still feel I've got something to offer, so that hunger and desire to get back is still very much there."

https://www.cricket.com.au/news/jam...ng-day-test-cape-town-south-africa/2019-12-25
 
The 37-year-old Anderson will be the ninth cricketer to reach the 150-Test milestone - joining the likes of Sachin Tendulkar, Steve Waugh and Jacques Kallis - when he makes his return to the England attack for the first time since limping off with a calf injury at the start of the Ashes in August.

Anderson has now reached that milestone.
 
The 37-year-old Anderson will be the ninth cricketer to reach the 150-Test milestone - joining the likes of Sachin Tendulkar, Steve Waugh and Jacques Kallis - when he makes his return to the England attack for the first time since limping off with a calf injury at the start of the Ashes in August.

Anderson has now reached that milestone.

5D9sCFG.png


First bowler to the milestone.


EMsjvltXYAADqMx
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Interestingly, Jimmy has had a 16 year career. Given the short span of an English cricketer's career, Jimmy must have one of the longest careers for an English cricketer in modern cricketing history.

Lol Alaistar cook played 161 test matches :O never knew...

And he retired at 33-34
 
Back
Top