Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I hope Haris and Rohail compete for the WK role in the PK team in the coming decade. Too many of our WK`s get lazy because they have so little competition and think they are indispensable
Is Muhammad Huraira the same as Abu Huraira?
Which one was the one who was leading run scorer at the one day cup?
Muhammad Huraira from central Punajb, he was also third highest run scorer in 3 day compeition
Is he with the squad but on the bench or not in the squad at all?
Zim 165/2 in 32 overs. Required rate nearing 7.5 but wickets in hand....
Great game
Where is that next Naseem Shah(according to Ijaz)-Amir Khan, the one who can bowl upto 147 kph
looks like we will be losing this which means we should be knocked out of world cup if i am correct...
looks like we will be losing this which means we should be knocked out of world cup if i am correct...
Great game
Where is that next Naseem Shah(according to Ijaz)-Amir Khan, the one who can bowl upto 147 kph
I have seen his bowling videos. He's not express and he's also very raw. Our coaches just go over the top most of the times.
Plenty of wrist slitting in this thread. It's a bloodbath!
Videos are difficult to judge. Even from live matches in national T20 cup people were saying that Naseem is 135 kph bowler.
We will get thrashed by Bangladesh
We are minnows in front of them at U19 level
Game Over.
Pakistan go to the Quarter Finals
Are you delusional?
India won by only 20 runs in the warm up match against Zim. Does that mean BD are better than India too?
Game is still on..
Can't disagree with what you have said but he's no Naseem Shah yet.
Are you delusional?
India won by only 20 runs in the warm up match against Zim. Does that mean BD are better than India too?
Right Folks as i said two weeks ago i was so excited to see a so called opener bowling medium pace...Two matches Mohammed Shehzad hasnt even bowled a ball and his batting has hardly set the world on fire..so what was all that statement from Ijaz Ahmed about ..this is MY BOLD decision as he opens and bowls....
Pakistan U19 vs Bangladesh U19 match on Friday will decide QFs.
Winner of that Match will play SAF U19 in QF
Loser of that Match will play AFG U19 in QF
Ijaz Ahmed deserves a sack
Pakistan U19 vs Bangladesh U19 match on Friday will decide QFs.
Winner of that Match will play SAF U19 in QF
Loser of that Match will play AFG U19 in QF
Plenty of wrist slitting in this thread. It's a bloodbath!
Ijaz Ahmed deserves a sack
Lol then Pakistan know what they have to do against BD.
Are you delusional?
India won by only 20 runs in the warm up match against Zim. Does that mean BD are better than India too?
It was a warm up match Atleast a couple of Indians retired after batting for sometime.
Bangladesh and India are about even. They played each other four times last year and it was 3 - 1 in favour of India but two of those matches that India won could have gone either way.
Pakistan is nowhere near either Bangladesh or India. You got kicked out of the last U19 Asia Cup in the group stages.
Choti choti khushiyan for them.What is their to chest bump about your mighty bd u19 side .?Your so called u19 super star in past are average at senior cricket while from Pakistan Shaheen afridi ,naseem shah have already proven to be great finds .
i would rather have knockout in first stage of u19 worldcup if we can produce super star like naseem ,shaheen
)
)
) SO TRUE.
Wrist slitting everywhere!
That's the only thing you know. Sack everyone. Except Sarfraz & Mickey Dark Era.
Stop posting rubbish when did I support sarfraz. Show me evidence. As for Mickey I wanted him to continue and if we wanted to replace Mickey. Then we should have got someone better not shameless misbah.
I follow all cricket not just internationals and specially I don't watch or follow cricket because my favourite is selected. Coming to ijaz as you clearly don't follow u19 since your master is not the coach let me educate you. Shehzad was a total failure in u16 vs Bangladesh and in the u19 domestics but he selected which you can explain. To make things worse he playing at the expense of the guy who was the highest u19 scorer in the u19 tournament. Plus I have watched both of them bat and mohammed huraira is better then him. Shehzad has failed in all the games this tournament including the warm ups but he keeps getting selected. His strike rate is awful to say the least and we were told by ijaz that he bowls and is an all rounder and he's yet to bowl. Explain why shehzad?
Secondly haris has been a consistent u19 batsmen and batted at 4 and 5 against South Africa and Sri Lanka where he won us few games and more importantly he had comfortably the best striker rate. Now genius ijaz decides to bat him at 6 knowing well he has done well batting at 4 and 5.
Now coming to irfan khan naizi which your hero rates. Should be enough for you to support him regardless him being good or rubbish. He played against South Africa where he was one of our leading runs scorer. He showed can play accordingly to situation. He got an unbeaten 100 there too. Plus runs at a high strike rate too. In addition he scored at 47 in quaid e azam trophy second 11. The first match he batted at 3 I believe where he scored 38 off 32 balls beaten. What does ijaz do he bats him at 7 when he's a top order batsmen.
Arish ali was the leading wicket taker in the u19 tournament I believe and he's yet to get a game.
Let's move to fahad munir. He's an all rounder but doesn't bowl much and bats at 3. He was batting around 60 odd strike rate against South Africa and didn't bat against Scotland since he plays at misbah strike rate hence usable in that game. In the warm ups he was batting work 60 odd strike rate again. But he keeps getting played at the most crucial position of 3. Again today he played at a pathetic strike rate of 60 odd again which nearly cost us the game. While in bowling he 24 off 4 overs and qasim akram outbowled him who plays mainly as a batsmen. Today we were lucky because haris played a gem of an innings as well as qasim akram played at higher strike rate.
Next time you question someone analyse watch and most importantly don't make lies up.
I clearly wrote it was a warmup match. So what’s with the repetition?
Also how does them retiring have to do with how you bowled?
Stop posting rubbish when did I support sarfraz. Show me evidence. As for Mickey I wanted him to continue and if we wanted to replace Mickey. Then we should have got someone better not shameless misbah.
I follow all cricket not just internationals and specially I don't watch or follow cricket because my favourite is selected. Coming to ijaz as you clearly don't follow u19 since your master is not the coach let me educate you. Shehzad was a total failure in u16 vs Bangladesh and in the u19 domestics but he selected which you can explain. To make things worse he playing at the expense of the guy who was the highest u19 scorer in the u19 tournament. Plus I have watched both of them bat and mohammed huraira is better then him. Shehzad has failed in all the games this tournament including the warm ups but he keeps getting selected. His strike rate is awful to say the least and we were told by ijaz that he bowls and is an all rounder and he's yet to bowl. Explain why shehzad?
Secondly haris has been a consistent u19 batsmen and batted at 4 and 5 against South Africa and Sri Lanka where he won us few games and more importantly he had comfortably the best striker rate. Now genius ijaz decides to bat him at 6 knowing well he has done well batting at 4 and 5.
Now coming to irfan khan naizi which your hero rates. Should be enough for you to support him regardless him being good or rubbish. He played against South Africa where he was one of our leading runs scorer. He showed can play accordingly to situation. He got an unbeaten 100 there too. Plus runs at a high strike rate too. In addition he scored at 47 in quaid e azam trophy second 11. The first match he batted at 3 I believe where he scored 38 off 32 balls beaten. What does ijaz do he bats him at 7 when he's a top order batsmen.
Arish ali was the leading wicket taker in the u19 tournament I believe and he's yet to get a game.
Let's move to fahad munir. He's an all rounder but doesn't bowl much and bats at 3. He was batting around 60 odd strike rate against South Africa and didn't bat against Scotland since he plays at misbah strike rate hence usable in that game. In the warm ups he was batting work 60 odd strike rate again. But he keeps getting played at the most crucial position of 3. Again today he played at a pathetic strike rate of 60 odd again which nearly cost us the game. While in bowling he 24 off 4 overs and qasim akram outbowled him who plays mainly as a batsmen. Today we were lucky because haris played a gem of an innings as well as qasim akram played at higher strike rate.
Next time you question someone analyse watch and most importantly don't make lies up.
Stop posting rubbish when did I support sarfraz. Show me evidence. As for Mickey I wanted him to continue and if we wanted to replace Mickey. Then we should have got someone better not shameless misbah.
I follow all cricket not just internationals and specially I don't watch or follow cricket because my favourite is selected. Coming to ijaz as you clearly don't follow u19 since your master is not the coach let me educate you. Shehzad was a total failure in u16 vs Bangladesh and in the u19 domestics but he selected which you can explain. To make things worse he playing at the expense of the guy who was the highest u19 scorer in the u19 tournament. Plus I have watched both of them bat and mohammed huraira is better then him. Shehzad has failed in all the games this tournament including the warm ups but he keeps getting selected. His strike rate is awful to say the least and we were told by ijaz that he bowls and is an all rounder and he's yet to bowl. Explain why shehzad?
Secondly haris has been a consistent u19 batsmen and batted at 4 and 5 against South Africa and Sri Lanka where he won us few games and more importantly he had comfortably the best striker rate. Now genius ijaz decides to bat him at 6 knowing well he has done well batting at 4 and 5.
Now coming to irfan khan naizi which your hero rates. Should be enough for you to support him regardless him being good or rubbish. He played against South Africa where he was one of our leading runs scorer. He showed can play accordingly to situation. He got an unbeaten 100 there too. Plus runs at a high strike rate too. In addition he scored at 47 in quaid e azam trophy second 11. The first match he batted at 3 I believe where he scored 38 off 32 balls beaten. What does ijaz do he bats him at 7 when he's a top order batsmen.
Arish ali was the leading wicket taker in the u19 tournament I believe and he's yet to get a game.
Let's move to fahad munir. He's an all rounder but doesn't bowl much and bats at 3. He was batting around 60 odd strike rate against South Africa and didn't bat against Scotland since he plays at misbah strike rate hence usable in that game. In the warm ups he was batting work 60 odd strike rate again. But he keeps getting played at the most crucial position of 3. Again today he played at a pathetic strike rate of 60 odd again which nearly cost us the game. While in bowling he 24 off 4 overs and qasim akram outbowled him who plays mainly as a batsmen. Today we were lucky because haris played a gem of an innings as well as qasim akram played at higher strike rate.
Next time you question someone analyse watch and most importantly don't make lies up.
Afg are better than SA
[MENTION=138958]Khan12[/MENTION]
One thing to correct, Shehzad has not played any domestic U19 tournament.
That is why I wrote that Pakistan know what to do against BD. They crushed SA 7-0 in SA. Of course they would want to meet them instead of AFG who have defeated Pak U19s not long ago.