How do you define what is logical and what isn't. Our intelligence is limited, even the smartest person in World only has the intelligence which is given to him, no more than that.
That is what we say when we do not have answers to certain questions. Our knowledge and intelligence is limite, Allah knows best etc. etc.
By logic, I am referring to scientific logic. If try to validate religion through the lens of scientific logic/knowledge, our faith will be weakened. That is why it is about your faith. When you have faith, you accept without challenging its logic.
There is no logic on where God came from, why did he create the world, why are human beings on trial today because Adam made a mistake and got banished from the Heavens, why some people are born poor and some are born rich etc. etc. These things are purely based on faith.
There are scientic factors mentioned in Quran which people didn't understand at that time or even later, but with better technology scientists have understood now, for instance how a child is formed in the womb.
That again, is not true. The so-called science in religious texts is so vague that they can be interpreted in a number of ways, including the formation of a fetus in the womb. The problem is that we use contemporary science to validate the science in Quran.
Today, we say that embryology is described in the Quran, but if after a 1,000 years, medical science says that they were wrong about how babies are produced in the fetus and they are produced like XYZ, then we will go back to the Quran and try to validate the 1,000 years later science.
Based on the science in Quran, one can prove that the Earth is flat or it is not flat. Science is not derived from the Quran, but we try to validate what we know about science through the vague science of Quran which is very easy to interpret in a number of ways. As a result, the science in Quran can be interpreted conveniently to suit the modern day science. If science changes, so do the interpretations.
The claims that science has proved this and that in the Quran are all baseless claims with no factual evidence. There is no scholarly work or any research papers that have been published to verify the science in the Quran, and neither have they been accredited by leading scientists and researchers.
That day, I saw a video on Facebook which claimed that modern science has proved that drinking water while standing is bad for your knees. That is total nonsense and there is no medical evidence or research that validates this conclusion.
Ask any leading orthopedic in the world and he will tell you that there is no evidence of this claim. Same goes for the taboo subject of self-pleasure. According to Islamic medical science, it is supposed to cause hair loss, weakness and even blindness, but that is simply not true according to medical science.
Now you can say that medical science is wrong, but if you are taking the word of a religious scholars who have no knowledge of science and cannot differentiate between a plant cell and an animal cell over the research of leading researchers and scientists in the world with years and years of study, then that is your faith. Irrational it may be, but you cannot argue with faith.
So if the scientist are atheists doesn't mean they have the correct answers. The correct answers are found in Quran. With time more and more people would find out that.
That again, is your faith. The word of these scientists are infinitely more credible than the word of Tariq Jameel, Zakir Naik or Mufti Menk, because their work is based on years of research and that research is then verified and scrutinized by hundreds and thousands of other researchers and only then their work is allowed to be published.
The problem is that when the religious scholars comment on science, the audience is generally not knowledgeable enough to substantiate their claims. When a Maulvi claims that drinking water while standing is bad for health, or fasting is beneficial for health, or honey is a cure to all illness etc., their claims are not substantiated. No one asks them to prove these so-called facts, and these lies propagate and eventually get passed as 'scientific facts' in the Quran.
In the academic world, you cannot state so-called facts without having your 'fact' verified by other researchers who have spent years studying and researching the field. If you drag science into religion, your religion will be logically tested, and a person cannot simply refute the work of leading scientists and researchers even though their knowledge on that subject is not even 0.1% of theirs.
If you are refuting their work, then you must present your work and explain why they are wrong. Your work will then be tested and reviewed by other scientists and if you proven to be correct, you will get a Nobel Prize for it -this is how the academic world works.
As far as the statement that 'with time more and more people would find out that', again, that is contrary to how the modern day science is operating and the speed at which it is developing.
When we say that our knowledge is limited, we fail to take into account that the limitation of our knowledge is relative. 500 years ago, if you would have told someone that you will be sitting in China and be able to watch someone sitting in Europe, you would have been labeled as crazy.
If you would have told someone that one day, man will walk on the moon, he would have been left reeling in a mental asylum. Modern day science has allowed people to interfere with God's work, and this why people are moving away from religion.
We are told that God created this Earth for us humans and other organisms, but after 5,000 years when we colonize Mars, what then? Did we just create our own Earth?
All of these scientific questions drive a person away from religion. That is why if you bring in logic and science to validate your religion, your faith will weaken. Faith at the end of the day is just faith, and this faith has allowed you to believe that the work of all these scientists is wrong even though you don't have (I'm assuming) knowledge of these sciences and cannot say how and why they are wrong, but you have faith that they are wrong because you only believe in what the Quran says. Now that is certainly not wrong, in fact it is beautiful, but we must learn to keep science and religion aside.