What's new

[VIDEOS] Why Indian Hindus hate Zakir Naik so profoundly?

Justcrazy said:
Correct ? Brother religion is based on scriptures , apart from Islam , if someone can prove me their scripture is in untampered form , with chain of narrations I will believe that.

As I said I am open to accept , if correct evidence is provided.
Click to expand...

Neither is Islam ... see video link in post# 55
 
Justcrazy said:
If I believe myself to be true , it makes others false by default.

For a Christian his doctrine is correct , Islam , Hinduism ,Buddhism etc are false.

2 +2 can only be four , it cannot be 6 or 5 .
Click to expand...
that im not disagreeing with. For everyone there religion is the truth.

Issue is when you start preaching this fact, that your faith is wrong and mine is correct
 
BouncerGuy said:
You will only find people from India and Indian origin against Him. Calling everyone a terrorist is quite easy but there is no proof.
Click to expand...

Look I have no issue with accepting he is wrong , but just mere statement is not enough , statement needs to be backed with evidence. Zakir Naik is an educated person , I do not think he would do such a thing. Islam no where preaches killing of Innocent people. If any Muslim is encouraging such an act , that person is is himself to be blamed.
 
Major said:
that im not disagreeing with. For everyone there religion is the truth.

Issue is when you start preaching this fact, that your faith is wrong and mine is correct
Click to expand...

If I am saying I am correct that by default means you are wrong.

If I say God is formless , that by default means Idols of God are false.

When I am saying that I am not placing a gun on others to believe me, they are free to question me regarding my believe , as I am free to question them.
 
Justcrazy said:
I will answer your question , but for that I need to know your background. So , what is your believe ? Do you believe in any religion or not?
Click to expand...

Doesnt matter what my beliefs are .... I am not here to claim or impose my religion on anyone. YOU however claimed that your holy scripture is in an untampered form. So pls watch that video and it will tell you why that isn't so.
 
uppercut said:
Doesnt matter what my beliefs are .... I am not here to claim or impose my religion on anyone. YOU however claimed that your holy scripture is in an untampered form. So pls watch that video and it will tell you why that isn't so.
Click to expand...

When you answer a person you need to know the background to give proper answer. The answer you give to a Muslim will be different to a hindu , or a christian . It will differ when you answer a layman or someone of knowledge.

So , no one has time for such long videos.

I am having conversation with you , not some random person online.

Just two things , your background , and one contradiction you believe Quran has. One point at a time.
Thanks.
 
Justcrazy said:
When you answer a person you need to know the background to give proper answer. The answer you give to a Muslim will be different to a hindu , or a christian . It will differ when you answer a layman or someone of knowledge.
Click to expand...

You dont need to know anything about my background because YOU were the one that claimed that your religion is the one and only true religion and that your holy text has never changed. So all you need to do is watch that video and let us know how you are going to debunk a TON of material that he has presented.

Justcrazy said:
So , no one has time for such long videos.
Click to expand...

Thats why I gave you a timestamped link. It will take less than 15 mins


Justcrazy said:
I am having conversation with you , not some random person online.

Just two things , your background , and one contradiction you believe Quran has. One point at a time.
Thanks.
Click to expand...

Again this is not about contradictions in Quran, its about the claim that it is the unchanged/unedited text ( amongst few other historical, geographical issues. ). Watch it !
 
Justcrazy said:
You have full right to do so , if you can . Nothing wrong in propagating what is truth according to you till it does not harm others.
Click to expand...

Neither do we do it nor do we need people of other religions to tell how we should be.
 
Justcrazy said:
Correct ? Brother religion is based on scriptures , apart from Islam , if someone can prove me their scripture is in untampered form , with chain of narrations I will believe that.

As I said I am open to accept , if correct evidence is provided.

Islam is NOT against co existence , people have right to follow own religion , but I have right to present my case. Job of a Muslim is only to give the message to others , and clear misconceptions about Islam. No one can or should force someone to be a Muslim.
Click to expand...

This is the problem.

Muslims believe that people need to prove it to them regarding other religions.

No they don't. Neither do other religions need any certificate from Islam.

You are happy with your religion. Good.

I am happy with mine.

There is no need to debate.

This isn't a competition. This is faith.
 
Justcrazy said:
Look I have no issue with accepting he is wrong , but just mere statement is not enough , statement needs to be backed with evidence. Zakir Naik is an educated person , I do not think he would do such a thing. Islam no where preaches killing of Innocent people. If any Muslim is encouraging such an act , that person is is himself to be blamed.
Click to expand...

Why did UK Canada Sri Lanka etc banned him?

Ayman Al Zawahiri was a very educated person. Isn't it?
 
Major said:
that im not disagreeing with. For everyone there religion is the truth.

Issue is when you start preaching this fact, that your faith is wrong and mine is correct
Click to expand...
You have said this a few times but apart from saying it haven't given any reasons why.

Why is it an issue to preach that your religion is a fact?
 
cricketjoshila said:
Why did UK Canada Sri Lanka etc banned him?

Ayman Al Zawahiri was a very educated person. Isn't it?
Click to expand...
They are ignoring this point like a plague and only blaming hindus.

Why did BD banned him? None of these guys will respond.

Why did UK ban him? Can our resident Brit Pakistani's answer?
 
The Bald Eagle said:
There is always a reason to hate some one. It could be one's brutal or unjust actions and sometimes it could also pertain to one's foul language full of tropes, lies or expletives. But why a scholar like Zakir Naik enjoys a status of boogeyman for Indian Hindus even among liberal Hindus despite the fact that he has never partake in any terrorist activity against the Indians and never have endorsed any such attempt.

So is the hatred against Zakir Naik result of his conversion of Hindus to Islam on mass scale or is there any plausible explanation by Hindus to justify their hatred of modern day inter religion scholar?
Click to expand...
Why to Pakistanis hate Indians by giving red carpet to a hate monger??
 
aboveandbeyond said:
Why do hindutwa justify Hitler II (Netanyahu) to massacre Thousands of innocent children and women
Click to expand...

Same reason why likes of Kier Starmer, Joe Biden etc supports and arms Israel. Though no one advocates killing of innocent children and women but everyone unanimously understands that Israel has got right to self defend. If likes of Hezbollah, Hamas and Houthis fire rockets at Israel, Israel will fire back.

Talking about women, why do Islamists never condemn the Taliban rule in Afghanistan who has caged women in that country deprived of any rights?
 
Rajdeep said:
Same reason why likes of Kier Starmer, Joe Biden etc supports and arms Israel. Though no one advocates killing of innocent children and women but everyone unanimously understands that Israel has got right to self defend. If likes of Hezbollah, Hamas and Houthis fire rockets at Israel, Israel will fire back.

Talking about women, why do Islamists never condemn the Taliban rule in Afghanistan who has caged women in that country deprived of any rights?
Click to expand...

Do the Palastanians have the right to defend themselves?

What about Modis human rights record against minorities. Do you condemn it?
 
aboveandbeyond said:
Do the Palastanians have the right to defend themselves?

What about Modis human rights record against minorities. Do you condemn it?
Click to expand...
Who is saying Palestanians are not defending themselves? Iran with its proxies are continuously attacking Israel on behalf of Palestine. They are aggressors and that is why most western world (where you live) sides with Israel.

Minorities are flourishing in India under Modi. Why will I condemn it?

Do you not see how many muslim players play for India? Siraj Bhai, Shami Bhai, Sarfraz Bhai etc etc. Do you not remember how Javed Akhtar schooled Pakistani journalist about 26/11 when he travelled there? Does any of these suggest that minorities are supressed in India? It is a figment of imagination among Islamists who themselves don't give any right to minorities viz a viz what is happening in present Bangladesh.

When was the last time any hindu or christian or sikh cricketer played for India? Do you condemn?
 
Rajdeep said:
Who is saying Palestanians are not defending themselves? Iran with its proxies are continuously attacking Israel on behalf of Palestine. They are aggressors and that is why most western world (where you live) sides with Israel.

Minorities are flourishing in India under Modi. Why will I condemn it?

Do you not see how many muslim players play for India? Siraj Bhai, Shami Bhai, Sarfraz Bhai etc etc. Do you not remember how Javed Akhtar schooled Pakistani journalist about 26/11 when he travelled there? Does any of these suggest that minorities are supressed in India? It is a figment of imagination among Islamists who themselves don't give any right to minorities viz a viz what is happening in present Bangladesh.

When was the last time any hindu or christian or sikh cricketer played for India? Do you condemn?
Click to expand...

So you finally agree, Palastanians have the right to defendthemselves, glad the delusion symptoms have declined.
 
aboveandbeyond said:
So you finally agree, Palastanians have the right to defendthemselves, glad the delusion symptoms have declined.
Click to expand...
Everyone has right to self defend....I have maintained this from day 1. In this case though, Hamas & Hezbollah were the aggressors and Israel is self defending themselves.
 
aboveandbeyond said:
Lol. I Never championed treatments of minorities in any team. You did. So when I revealed some hard truths you've lost it.

Any way, no point derailing the thread . Let's stick to the Topic, and appreciate the intellect qualities of Dr zakir Naik.
Click to expand...

You said why did I never questioned the treatment of minorities in India. You did right?

So I just gave you examples that minorities of India are flourishing in every field. Considering this is a cricket forum, I gave examples of cricket. How come a countries cricket team has so many minority players playing if they are not treated well and dnt get fair opportunities. Your argument now look silly right?

Then to further save the embarrassment, you quoted an article from Al Jazeera saying few no named online trolls attacked Shami and Arshdeep. I just gave you example how online trolls belong to every country...how English football players for racially abused too. Also how there is no guarantee that a person pretending to be Indian in twitter is actually who he is claiming to be.

Now you are asking me to stick to the topic.

Okay I will stick to the topic but lets summarise what we have learned in the past 30 mins -

A) Indian minorities are flourishing
B) You couldnt come with any substantiative logic to counter my points
C) Now taking the escape route.

Good day

:kp
 
Rajdeep said:
You said why did I never questioned the treatment of minorities in India. You did right?

So I just gave you examples that minorities of India are flourishing in every field. Considering this is a cricket forum, I gave examples of cricket. How come a countries cricket team has so many minority players playing if they are not treated well and dnt get fair opportunities. Your argument now look silly right?

Then to further save the embarrassment, you quoted an article from Al Jazeera saying few no named online trolls attacked Shami and Arshdeep. I just gave you example how online trolls belong to every country...how English football players for racially abused too. Also how there is no guarantee that a person pretending to be Indian in twitter is actually who he is claiming to be.

Now you are asking me to stick to the topic.

Okay I will stick to the topic but lets summarise what we have learned in the past 30 mins -

A) Indian minorities are flourishing
B) You couldnt come with any substantiative logic to counter my points
C) Now taking the escape route.

Good day

:kp
Click to expand...

I could carry on and further expose the hypocrisies. But this thread is for the Great man Dr Zakir Naik. Possibly Sir Zakir Naik to you.
 
aboveandbeyond said:
I could carry on and further expose the hypocrisies. But this thread is for the Great man Dr Zakir Naik. Possibly Sir Zakir Naik to you.
Click to expand...
The same great man who is banned in UK, the country you live :rabada2

He is an extremist with 5 countries banned his entry. Only people with certain mindset find him great man.
 
Rajdeep said:
The same great man who is banned in UK, the country you live :rabada2

He is an extremist with 5 countries banned his entry. Only people with certain mindset find him great man.
Click to expand...

You labelling him a extremist means zilch. Majority of the Hindus who converted under his guidance, appreciate his services.
 
aboveandbeyond said:
You labelling him a extremist means zilch. Majority of the Hindus who converted under his guidance, appreciate his services.
Click to expand...
I am not labelling him as an extremist but 5 countries banned his entry bcoz of him being an extremist giving hate speech and luring people of religious conversions. Among those 5 countries also include United Kingdom where you live. You supporting him clearly meaning you are siding with extremists. Not cool bro.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rajdeep said:
What I am saying is, Pakistan has a massive problem in treatment of minorities. This is not only a problem in Pakistan though but in any nation ruled by Islamists. Just check what is happening with Hindu's in Bangladesh for example. So for you to come here and accuse Modi of mistreating minorities in India is an hilarious attempt.

Considering this is a cricket forum, I just gave example how minorities are flourishing in Indian cricket team where as hardly any non-muslim players plays for Pakistan. The handful of ones that did either got converted or mistreated due to their religious beliefs.

What I am saying is a fact and not something I am making it up.
Click to expand...

Minorities have been selected in the Pakistan team which you are clearly being ignorant to. If currently they are not good enough, tgat is a separate issue
 
Rajdeep said:
I am not labelling him as an extremist but 5 countries banned his entry bcoz of him being an extremist giving hate speech and luring people of religious conversions. Among those 5 countries also include United Kingdom where you live. You supporting him clearly meaning you are siding with extremists. Not cool bro.
Click to expand...

post 106, you labelled him as a extremist,

" He is a extremist who is banned from 5 countries"

Once again flipflop at its best.

So you presumed me being a British Pakistani, I would be living in a heavily Pakistani populated area, which once again shows your true colours.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
aboveandbeyond said:
Minorities have been selected in the Pakistan team which you are clearly being ignorant to. If currently they are not good enough, tgat is a separate issue
Click to expand...

Lol 4-5 minority players played for entire Pakistan's cricket history. The ones that did complained of discrimination. Compare that to a country like BD which has much less cricket history but already has hindu players like Liton, Sowmya etc.

Not a single non-muslim cricketer in the entire country is good enough to play in a team like Pakistan? And you truely believe in that and nothing to do with discrimination? Hilarious
 
DeadlyVenom said:
You have said this a few times but apart from saying it haven't given any reasons why.

Why is it an issue to preach that your religion is a fact?
Click to expand...

Saying 'Islam is the one true religion, that's a fact' is an ignorant way to say it. Fact means it a testable and reproduceable phenomenon which religion clearly is not. No religion is.

The correct way of saying it is ' We Muslims believe our religion to be the one true religion'. Assert that is a statement of belief, not fact.
 
aboveandbeyond said:
post 106, you labelled him as a extremist,

" He is a extremist who is banned from 5 countries"

Once again flipflop at its best.

So you presumed me being a British Pakistani, I would be living in a heavily Pakistani populated area, which once again shows your true colours.
Click to expand...

When did I flip flop? Looks like you have comprehension issues. I am saying 5 countries banned his entry for being an extremist and luring people to convert. So it is not only me accusing him being an extremist but 5 other countries too including the one where you reside.

You are free to support him though...that is the right a vibrant democracy like Britain gives you.
 
Zakir Naik exposes Hinduism, in India. This is not ZN's fault, but the fault of Hinduism. If Hinduism ideology were sound and not full of gaping holes, then it would take just one Hindutva Indian to shut Zakir Naik down - alas not possible!

There is no general consensus of what Hinduism stands for or represents, which is why it is so easy for the likes of Zakir Nail to dismantle Hinduism.

To be fair though, Modi alone is enough to expose Hindutva for what it really is.
 
Technics 1210 said:
Zakir Naik exposes Hinduism, in India. This is not ZN's fault, but the fault of Hinduism. If Hinduism ideology were sound and not full of gaping holes, then it would take just one Hindutva Indian to shut Zakir Naik down - alas not possible!
Click to expand...

What the gaping holes in Hinduism ?
 
Technics 1210 said:
Zakir Naik exposes Hinduism, in India. This is not ZN's fault, but the fault of Hinduism. If Hinduism ideology were sound and not full of gaping holes, then it would take just one Hindutva Indian to shut Zakir Naik down - alas not possible!

There is no general consensus of what Hinduism stands for or represents, which is why it is so easy for the likes of Zakir Nail to dismantle Hinduism.

To be fair though, Modi alone is enough to expose Hindutva for what it really is.
Click to expand...

This is it in a nutshell. Naik isn't exactly the most sophisticated debator, in fact even if you read the threads on him I would say most Pakistanis on here are more critical than supportive. But as a former Hindu he probably knows the Hindu scriptures quite well and maybe this is why he hits sensitive spots for a lot of our Hindu posters. That is understandable, but still more effective to just calmly pick apart his reasoning rather than get hysterical and throw labels like terrorist around. Is he really worth that much of your attention?
 
Wow I did not even realise he had been banned by Hasina. She really must have been in the pocket of Modi's India. What an indictment of her dictatorial regime.
 
sweep_shot said:
BD's ban of Zakir Naik may get lifted soon since Indian bootlicker Hasina is not in power anymore.
Click to expand...

Yeah wont be surprising that present Islamist regime of BD will lifting the ban of this extremist. Will they give him red carpet too, like Pakistan did?
 
Both were/are banned but since Hindutva extremist who actually ordered the killing is their guy so it was wrong that he was banned.
😉

Que for, Indian court did not find him guilty 😂😂😂
 
RexRex said:
Saying 'Islam is the one true religion, that's a fact' is an ignorant way to say it. Fact means it a testable and reproduceable phenomenon which religion clearly is not. No religion is.

The correct way of saying it is ' We Muslims believe our religion to be the one true religion'. Assert that is a statement of belief, not fact.
Click to expand...
What's the difference if someone says one vs two?

No matter how they say it the adherent of the religion believes it to be a fact. But to an audience ( of volunteer listeners) are the statements that much different that one is speech and causes communal tensions and the other isn't?
 
Rajdeep said:
Yeah wont be surprising that present Islamist regime of BD will lifting the ban of this extremist. Will they give him red carpet too, like Pakistan did?
Click to expand...
He got red carpet from Malaysia and Qatar. Do you think they are Islamist?

You guys spend too much time worrying about Zakir and his circus tricks.
 
DeadlyVenom said:
He got red carpet from Malaysia and Qatar. Do you think they are Islamist?

You guys spend too much time worrying about Zakir and his circus tricks.
Click to expand...
Yes...ofcourse. Are they not Muslim countries?

The other day one guy here told me there is do difference between Islamists and muslims and they are same as per oxford dictionary definition. He also accused that Islamist is a term given by posters here in PP and don't actually exist.
 
Rajdeep said:
He won't answer it.
Click to expand...

Why would I since it's not been me who has brought up his bans in various countries in the first place. This is an Indian poster led campaign, the only contention on my part has been that it's wrong to pretend it was for terrorism.
 
Cpt. Rishwat said:
This is it in a nutshell. Naik isn't exactly the most sophisticated debator, in fact even if you read the threads on him I would say most Pakistanis on here are more critical than supportive. But as a former Hindu he probably knows the Hindu scriptures quite well and maybe this is why he hits sensitive spots for a lot of our Hindu posters. That is understandable, but still more effective to just calmly pick apart his reasoning rather than get hysterical and throw labels like terrorist around. Is he really worth that much of your attention?
Click to expand...
I think the issue is that Hinduism includes a lot of ridiculous stuff that's easy to make fun of of you're so inclined - elephant and monkey headed gods included. But religion is a very sensitive and emotional subject and the you have to be careful of your language and tone in your criticism especially if you are an adherent of another religion.

Zakir Naik isn't and he's also high profile which makes him very difficult to tolerate.

It's like Charlie Hebdo's cartoonists demanded to be allowed to go around freely making cartoons of the Muslim prophet in Muslim states.

I have no idea of the money laundering accusations (from my experience of religious preachers, pretty likely) but the ban based on his preaching is clearly wrong but understandable.
 
Cpt. Rishwat said:
Why would I since it's not been me who has brought up his bans in various countries in the first place. This is an Indian poster led campaign, the only contention on my part has been that it's wrong to pretend it was for terrorism.
Click to expand...

But do you agree with the UK decision ?

Are you aware that a certain Robert Spencer, a staunch critic of Islam, has been banned from entering the UK ? This is a decision of the Home Ministry that many british muslims agree with. I assume you do too. Zakir Naik was likely banned in a similiar manner.
 
Red-Indian said:
I think the issue is that Hinduism includes a lot of ridiculous stuff that's easy to make fun of of you're so inclined - elephant and monkey headed gods included. But religion is a very sensitive and emotional subject and the you have to be careful of your language and tone in your criticism especially if you are an adherent of another religion.

Zakir Naik isn't and he's also high profile which makes him very difficult to tolerate.

It's like Charlie Hebdo's cartoonists demanded to be allowed to go around freely making cartoons of the Muslim prophet in Muslim states.

I have no idea of the money laundering accusations (from my experience of religious preachers, pretty likely) but the ban based on his preaching is clearly wrong but understandable.
Click to expand...

Then it depends on which side of the coin you fall. In the modern era it is argued that religion should be open to mockery. It is in fact the Muslims who have gained a reputation of not tolerating it with regard to their holy figures. Seems like Hindus are also now wanting to go down that path whereas previously it was not seen as much of an issue, so it's an interesting direction.
 
Rajdeep said:
Yes...ofcourse. Are they not Muslim countries?

The other day one guy here told me there is do difference between Islamists and muslims and they are same as per oxford dictionary definition. He also accused that Islamist is a term given by posters here in PP and don't actually exist.
Click to expand...
It's an interesting word.

But from now on I guess it's simpler to follow your definition. Any Muslim regime is an Islamist one. Therefore when India meets Qatari or Malaysian leaders they have held meetings with Islamist leaders.
 
RexRex said:
But do you agree with the UK decision ?

Are you aware that a certain Robert Spencer, a staunch critic of Islam, has been banned from entering the UK ? This is a decision of the Home Ministry that many british muslims agree with. I assume you do too. Zakir Naik was likely banned in a similiar manner.
Click to expand...

No I'm not aware of Robert Spencer or the reason for any bans. Like I said I am only following what has been posted on this thread, I don't follow the works of Zakir Naik or Robert Spencer.
 
Cpt. Rishwat said:
Then it depends on which side of the coin you fall. In the modern era it is argued that religion should be open to mockery. It is in fact the Muslims who have gained a reputation of not tolerating it with regard to their holy figures. Seems like Hindus are also now wanting to go down that path whereas previously it was not seen as much of an issue, so it's an interesting direction.
Click to expand...
That is definitely true. Hindus have become increasingly thin skinned. There was a time when I used to feel very comfortable making fun of Hindu beliefs and gods in casual company. In the current environment, I don't think I would dare except among a very close and trusted friend circle.

You're right that Muslims have always been sensitive. You can criticise in a polite manner but you can't make fun of Islamic beliefs and stuff in the Quran even if you find it utterly ridiculous privately.
 
Cpt. Rishwat said:
No I'm not aware of Robert Spencer or the reason for any bans. Like I said I am only following what has been posted on this thread, I don't follow the works of Zakir Naik or Robert Spencer.
Click to expand...

Okay but now that you got to know, do you agree with UK banning him on the pretext of being an extremist?

Its a simple question been asked but seems like you are reluctant to answer

:rabada2
 
Rajdeep said:
They are ignoring this point like a plague and only blaming hindus.

Why did BD banned him? None of these guys will respond.

Why did UK ban him? Can our resident Brit Pakistani's answer?
Click to expand...
BD banned him because The Begum wanted to please her masters. As he is allowed to live in Qatar, should Ind withdraw all its labour and impose sanctions and if they don't then what does that imply.
 
Bewal Express said:
So was Modi. Lest we forget.
Click to expand...
How can I forget when Pakistanis here remind of that everyday. However, I have answered it multiple time. Pls give it a read

Zakir Naik - What do you think of him?

you made the analogy. I merely agreed with your analogy Yup, becos religion has caused no deaths. and atheistic dogma commands atheists to go out kill becos they will reach heaven in afterlife... oh wait... I no where said religious wars did not occur , they did , but if you want to discuss...
ppforum.pakpassion.net ppforum.pakpassion.net
 
cricketjoshila said:
His views on Sanatan doesn't resonate with anyone.

He preaches extremism and that's why he has been banned from multiple countries.
Click to expand...
Qatar has banned him? Why haven't they? When are Ind going to get extradited. And talking about Hate Yogi Adityanath as apparently a future PM of Ind. A guy that spits bile against Muslims. Is he an extremist
 
Rajdeep said:
How can I forget when Pakistanis here remind of that everyday. However, I have answered it multiple time. Pls give it a read

Zakir Naik - What do you think of him?

you made the analogy. I merely agreed with your analogy Yup, becos religion has caused no deaths. and atheistic dogma commands atheists to go out kill becos they will reach heaven in afterlife... oh wait... I no where said religious wars did not occur , they did , but if you want to discuss...
ppforum.pakpassion.net ppforum.pakpassion.net
Click to expand...
The banning or none bannings are just games. Modi was banned then unbanned when he got close to power. The guy is called an extremist because they feared him not because he advocated extremist behaviour.
 
All my Brit Pakistani friends are unnecessarily getting riled up. The only question been asked of them is 'Why has UK banned Zakir Naik entering into UK? '

It is a simple question and one would expect a simple response. However they are bringing Modi, Qatar, Yogi, Hindutva and every whataboutery possible but maintaining pedestrian distance from answering the question itself. Ha..

:rabada2
 
DeadlyVenom said:
No matter how they say it the adherent of the religion believes it to be a fact.
Click to expand...

Words have meaning and they should be used as per their meaning.

A 'fact' is something that can be proved to be true by EVERYONE i.e an entity that can reproduced or observed to be true by anyone or in this case, proved to be true by both muslims and non-muslim.

Gravity is a fact because everybody experiences it. The Eiffel Towel is a fact because everybody can see that it exists.

'Islam is the one true religion' is only a claim (a belief), not a fact .. because it cannot proved to be true or observed to be true by everyone. A Christian would never say it is a fact that 'Jesus is the son of God', non-christans would laugh at him.
 
Bewal Express said:
Qatar has banned him? Why haven't they? When are Ind going to get extradited. And talking about Hate Yogi Adityanath as apparently a future PM of Ind. A guy that spits bile against Muslims. Is he an extremist
Click to expand...

UK Canada SL have banned him as well.

Please have Yogi Adityanath banned wherever you can. Let's see.
 
Bewal Express said:
The banning or none bannings are just games. Modi was banned then unbanned when he got close to power. The guy is called an extremist because they feared him not because he advocated extremist behaviour.
Click to expand...

Feared him? India UK Canada BD SL all feared him?

Modi was banned when he faced accusations. Modi was unbanned when courts exonerated him.
 
Bewal Express said:
BD banned him because The Begum wanted to please her masters. As he is allowed to live in Qatar, should Ind withdraw all its labour and impose sanctions and if they don't then what does that imply.
Click to expand...

He lives in Malaysia not Qatar.

After Saudis Emiratis US China and Turkey, is Qatar the new messiah of pakistanis?
 
cricketjoshila said:
He lives in Malaysia not Qatar.

After Saudis Emiratis US China and Turkey, is Qatar the new messiah of pakistanis?
Click to expand...
Yes but clearly it irks the Hindutwa, that Naik is next door giving lectures about his time in India when he had masses at his lectures and converting.
 
cricketjoshila said:
Feared him? India UK Canada BD SL all feared him?

Modi was banned when he faced accusations. Modi was unbanned when courts exonerated him.
Click to expand...
The other countries did it because you guys got scared off his success. Maybe you should have put some of your Hindu guys up against him🤣🤣🤣🤣
 
Rajdeep said:
Okay but now that you got to know, do you agree with UK banning him on the pretext of being an extremist?

Its a simple question been asked but seems like you are reluctant to answer

:rabada2
Click to expand...

I don't know why he was banned though so have no idea if I agree with it.
 
Bewal Express said:
The other countries did it because you guys got scared off his success. Maybe you should have put some of your Hindu guys up against him🤣🤣🤣🤣
Click to expand...

Success in inspiring terrorists?

Its sad that people inspiring terrorists is some kind of success for you.
 
cricketjoshila said:
Feared him? India UK Canada BD SL all feared him?

Modi was banned when he faced accusations. Modi was unbanned when courts exonerated him.
Click to expand...
Nothing to do with that. He was unbanned because he had power of the Worlds most populous nation and countries put their interests first.. Netanyahu isn't banned from America but he hasn't been cleared.
 
Bewal Express said:
Filled out stadiums from memory. But because these Hindutuva clowns couldn't debate him, they created this whole drama.
Click to expand...

Which stadium?

Why will any Hindu debate with any muslim?

Hindus don't need any certificate from anyone. Come down from that high horse. No hindu needs his endorsement.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

IAJ
Why Does Hindu Diaspora In Developed Multicultural Countries Hate Minorities Back Home In India?
Replies
15
Views
2K
Cpt. Rishwat
Cpt. Rishwat
offstump
The mass radicalisation that India does not acknowledge
Replies
3
Views
831
Cpt. Rishwat
Cpt. Rishwat
Back
Top