[VIDS] Southern Brave crowned men's Hundred champions after beating Birmingham Phoenix by 32 runs

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
217,715
Venues: Eight grounds across the UK Dates: 21 July-21 August

Twelve months later than planned, after years of talk and debate, The Hundred begins on Wednesday, live on BBC Two from 18:00 BST.

Over the next 32 days, the men's and women's competitions will run side-by-side with eight brand new teams, featuring many of the world's best players, competing to reach the finals on 21 August at Lord's.

The Hundred has split opinion throughout its build-up but promises to be cricket as the UK has never seen it before.

The Hundred is English cricket's attempt to grow the game by attracting a younger, more diverse audience.

It is the same sport but played in a new, shorter format which organisers hope will be easier to follow - each team batting for 100 balls and attempting to score as many runs as possible.

Eight city-based teams have been created - London Spirit, Oval Invincibles, Southern Brave, Welsh Fire, Birmingham Phoenix, Trent Rockets, Manchester Originals and Northern Superchargers - with each having picked two squads of 15 domestic and international players - one men's and one women's.

The tournament has been hit by the withdrawal of a number of high-profile international players, most because of issues related to travel during the Covid-19 pandemic, but it will still feature many of the best players in the world.

England's 2019 World Cup winners like Eoin Morgan, Jason Roy and Adil Rashid are set to play throughout, as are all of England's women's squad, including captain Heather Knight and world number one bowler Sophie Ecclestone.

England players selected to play India in the upcoming Test series, likely to be stars such as Joe Root, Ben Stokes and Jos Buttler, will play their team's first two games and possibly the final.

Each squad will also feature three overseas players - India sensation Shafali Verma, Afghanistan spinner Rashid Khan and South Africa's Quinton de Kock are the standouts - plus the very best from the domestic game.

Eighteen matches will be shown across BBC TV and iPlayer, including both finals, and BBC Music Introducing will also help provide live music and resident DJs at all 68 matches.

The tournament is not without its detractors.

Many argue is an expensive gamble or question whether it was necessary to bring in a fourth format when Twenty20 cricket is already successful.

One of the key aims of The Hundred is to showcase women's cricket and it will award equal prize money in the men's and women's competition.

There has been criticism, however, of the disparity in pay brackets - female players' contracts are worth between £3,600 and £15,000 but male players will earn between £24,000 and £100,000.

And an article in the Daily Telegraph earlier this week said the ECB had initially failed to respond to requests for support for female part-time players whose ability to work would be impacted during the tournament.

Critics also argue The Hundred devalues the long-standing county game, with the domestic 50-over competition - the format England are currently men's and women's world champions in - running alongside without its best players.

Fans of established county teams have said they do not have a team to support and others have suggested the tournament will sideline the 10 first-class counties whose grounds will not host Hundred teams.

Tom Harrison, the England and Wales Cricket Board chief executive, said English cricket would be in a "scary" place without the financial boost he hopes The Hundred can bring.

"I think people will discover a love for cricket who currently don't get an opportunity to," Harrison added.

"For cricket lovers I think you will find a place, even if it is hugely reluctant."

Responding to the Telegraph article, the ECB said: "We're pleased that through The Hundred more female cricketers are being paid to play the sport, and if any domestic part-time players face challenges carrying out their job safely while playing in the competition because of the Covid restrictions we'd encourage them to discuss this with their team or with us to assess what support we can offer."

How will it work?

The Hundred: Manchester Originals' Kate Cross and Sophie Ecclestone play Out of 100
The tournament begins with Oval Invincibles against Manchester Originals in the women's competition on Wednesday before the same two teams open the men's competition a day later.

From that point matches will be played as double-headers - the men's matches following the women's. All teams will play each other once in the group stage, apart from their paired 'rivals' who will play each other twice.

The team that finishes top of the table will progress to the final and the second and third-placed teams will meet in the eliminators on 20 August.

The biggest change to current forms of cricket is each 100-ball innings is essentially split into 20 five-ball overs.

All five balls must be delivered by the same bowler but a captain can choose to continue with the same bowler for 10 consecutive balls.

After a set of five balls the umpire will hold up a white card to signal the end of each over, but players will only change ends after every 10 balls - not at the end of each over.

Matches will last two and a half hours with each innings 65 minutes. A fielding team will be punished by having one fewer fielder allowed outside the inner circle if they fall behind their allotted time.

And with live music a big part of events off the field, the toss will take place on the music acts' stage, rather than on the field.

BBC
 
The Hundred Schedule

July

21 July, Oval Invincibles v Manchester Originals (women’s), Kia Oval

22 July, Oval Invincibles v Manchester Originals (men’s), Kia Oval

23 July, Birmingham Phoenix v London Spirit, Edgbaston

24 July, Trent Rockets v Southern Brave, Trent Bridge
Northern Superchargers v Welsh Fire, Emerald Headingley

25 July, London Spirit v Oval Invincibles, Lord’s
Manchester Originals v Birmingham Phoenix, Emirates Old Trafford

26 July, Trent Rockets v Northern Superchargers, Trent Bridge

27 July, Welsh Fire v Southern Brave, Sophia Gardens

28 July, Manchester Originals v Northern Superchargers, Emirates Old Trafford

29 July, London Spirit v Trent Rockets, Lord’s

30 July, Southern Brave v Birmingham Phoenix, Ageas Bowl

31 July, Welsh Fire v Manchester Originals, Sophia Gardens
Northern Superchargers v Oval Invincibles, Emerald Headingley


August

01 August, Birmingham Phoenix v Trent Rockets, Edgbaston
London Spirit v Southern Brave, Lord’s

02 August, Oval Invincibles v Welsh Fire, Kia Oval

03 August, London Spirit v Northern Superchargers, Lord’s

04 August, Birmingham Phoenix v Oval Invincibles, Edgbaston

05 August, Manchester Originals v Southern Brave, Emirates Old Trafford

06 August, Welsh Fire v Trent Rockets, Sophia Gardens

07 August, Southern Brave v Northern Superchargers, Ageas Bowl

08 August, Oval Invincibles v Trent Rockets, Kia Oval

09 August, Birmingham Phoenix v Welsh Fire, Edgbaston

10 August, Manchester Originals v London Spirit, Emirates Old Trafford

11 August, Southern Brave v Welsh Fire, Ageas Bowl

12 August, Northern Superchargers v Manchester Originals, Emerald Headingley

13 August, Trent Rockets v Birmingham Phoenix, Trent Bridge

14 August, Oval Invincibles v London Spirit, Kia Oval

15 August, Trent Rockets v Manchester Originals, Trent Bridge

16 August, Southern Brave v Oval Invincibles, Ageas Bowl

17 August, Northern Superchargers v Birmingham Phoenix, Emerald Headingley

18 August, Welsh Fire v London Spirit, Sophia Gardens

20 August, Eliminator (both men’s and women’s), Kia Oval

21 August, Finals (both men’s and women’s), Lord’s


The Hundred squads

Birmingham Phoenix

Men’s: Chris Woakes, Dom Sibley, Moeen Ali (captain), Pat Brown, Adam Hose, Tom Helm, Benny Howell, Chris Cooke, Liam Livingstone, Tom Abell, Daniel Bell-Drummond, Miles Hammond, Adam Milne, Imran Tahir, Finn Allen, Will Smeed, Dillon Pennington

Women’s: Amy Jones (captain), Shafali Verma, Ria Fackrell, Marie Kelly, Evelyn Jones, Emily Arlott, Kirstie Gordon, Phoebe Franklin, Abtaha Maqsood, Thea Brookes, Gwen Davies, Isabelle Wong, Georgia Elwiss, Erin Burns, Katie Mack


London Spirit

Men’s: Zak Crawley, Dan Lawrence, Eoin Morgan (captain), Mohammad Amir, Jade Dernbach, Mohammad Nabi, Luis Reece, Adam Rossington, Mason Crane, Joe Denly, Josh Inglis, Roelof Van Der Merwe, Mark Wood, Ravi Bopara, Chris Wood, Blake Cullen

Women’s: Deandra Dottin, Naomi Dattani, Deepti Sharma, Heather Knight (captain), Amara Carr, Aylish Cranstone, Danielle Gibson, Susie Rowe, Chloe Tryon, Charlie Dean, Freya Davies, Sophie Munro, Tammy Beaumont, Grace Scrivens, Alice Monaghan


Manchester Originals

Men’s: Jos Buttler, Joe Clarke, Phil Salt, Matt Parkinson, Kagiso Rabada, Jamie Overton, Tom Lammonby, Steven Finn, Colin Ackermann, Richard Gleeson, Tom Hartley, Carlos Brathwaite, Colin Munro, Ollie Robinson, Sam Hain, Fred Klaassen

Women’s: Kate Cross, Danielle Collins, Mignon du Preez, Harmanpreet Kaur, Alice Dyson, Cordelia Griffith, Hannah Jones, Lizelle Lee, Georgie Boyce, Natalie Brown, Ellie Threlkeld, Alex Hartley, Emma Lamb, Sophie Ecclestone, Laura Jackson.


Northern Superchargers

Men’s: Ben Stokes, Adil Rashid, David Willey, Tom Kohler-Cadmore, Adam Lyth, Brydon Carse, Chris Lynn, John Simpson, Mujeeb Ur Rahman, Matthew Potts, Matthew Fisher, Harry Brook, Callum Parkinson, Faf du Plessis, Jordan Thompson, Ben Raine

Women’s: Hollie Armitage, Katie Levick, Jemimah Rodrigues, Lauren Winfield-Hill (captain), Helen Fenby, Bess Heath, Beth Langston, Linsey Smith, Alice Davidson-Richards, Laura Kimmince, Laura Wolvaardt, Sterre Kalis, Kalea Moore


Oval Invincibles

Men’s: Sam Curran, Rory Burns, Tom Curran, Reece Topley, Alex Blake, Sunil Narine, Jason Roy, Nathan Sowter, Sam Billings, Laurie Evans, Will Jacks, Sandeep Lamichhane, Saqib Mahmood, Colin Ingram, Brandon Glover, Jordan Clark, Jordan Cox

Women’s: Fran Wilson, Georgia Adams, Tash Farrant, Megan Belt, Eva Gray, Marizanne Kapp, Rhianna Southby, Sarah Bryce, Alice Capsey, Jo Gardner, Dane Van Niekerk, Mady Villiers, Shabnim Ismail, Danielle Gregory


Southern Brave

Men’s: Jofra Archer, Liam Dawson, George Garton, Chris Jordan, Tymal Mills, Delray Rawlins, James Vince, Alex Davies, Max Waller, Craig Overton, Ross Whiteley, Danny Briggs, Devon Conway, Quinton de Kock, Jake Lintott, Colin de Grandhomme

Women’s: Maia Bouchier, Freya Kemp, Smriti Mandhana, Tara Norris, Carla Rudd, Paige Scholfield, Anya Shrubsole, Stafanie Taylor, Danni Wyatt, Lauren Bell, Sonia Odedra, Fi Morris, Sophia Dunkley, Amanda-Jade Wellington, Ella McCaughan, Charlotte Taylor


Trent Rockets

Men’s: Joe Root, Rashid Khan, Alex Hales, Matt Carter, Dawid Malan, Tom Moores, Steven Mullaney, Ben Cox, Lewis Gregory, D’Arcy Short, Luke Wood, Luke Wright, Samit Patel, Timm van der Gugten, Sam Cook, Marchant de Lange

Women’s: Katherine Brunt, Nat Sciver, Kathryn Bryce, Abbey Freeborn, Nancy Harman, Lucy Higham, Michaela Kirk, Ellie Mitchell, Heather Graham, Sammy-Jo Johnson, Rachel Priest, Ella Claridge, Emily Windsor, Sarah Glenn, Teresa Graves


Welsh Fire

Men’s: Ollie Pope, Jonny Bairstow, Tom Banton, Ben Duckett, Qais Ahmad, Ryan Higgins, David Payne, Liam Plunkett, Jake Ball, Iain Cockbain, Josh Cobb, Matt Critchley, David Lloyd, Jimmy Neesham (first three games), Glenn Phillips, Leus du Plooy

Women’s: Katie George, Alex Griffiths, Georgia Hennessy, Lauren Filer, Sophie Luff, Natasha Wraith, Amy Gordon, Bryony Smith, Sarah Taylor, Piepa Cleary, Georgia Redmayne, Bethan Ellis, Lissy Macleod, Nicole Harvey, Hayley Matthews.
 
This competition has been doomed from the start and is destined to fail. ECB were literally throwing tickets away last week i picked up a few tickets for free for a couple of the double headers, will be intresting to see how it develops. But the fact that free tickets were available so late in the day before KO shows how well the sales must be doing.
 
ECB spokesperson: "We are really disappointed that Sandeep Lamichhane isn't able to play in the first edition of The Hundred due to Visa issues. We hope cricket fans will be able to see him in action in the competition in the future."
 
This competition has been doomed from the start and is destined to fail. ECB were literally throwing tickets away last week i picked up a few tickets for free for a couple of the double headers, will be intresting to see how it develops. But the fact that free tickets were available so late in the day before KO shows how well the sales must be doing.

Why do you say that?

This has the same chance as any other competition in the world.
 
Now that the tournament has started, think a lot of the hysteria around it will die down once people realize there ain't much of a fundamental difference between 20 5-ball overs or 20 6-ball overs.

It's still recognizable cricket where bowlers bowl bouncers, slower balls, yorkers, full-tosses & long-hops like in any other format. Already seen some of the batters today playing the forward defensive stroke or offering no shot and letting the ball go harmlessly through to the keeper.

I do doubt however that the ECB will be successful in attracting new age fans, it'll still be the traditionalist legacy fans who've been disgracefully scorned by the ECB marketing team that'll buy the tickets.
 
Last edited:
Have to say I am interested in seeing this. As much as it is against the central tenets of cricket, I can understand the logic and reasoning behind dumbing down the rules to appeal to a wider, more casual audience.

Its easy to write something off without actually seeing it play out. So I am going to reserve my judgment. At the end of the day it is essentially a slightly shorter T20 match so its not like its something completely new and alien. Plus Amir and Wahab are playing in the tournament and there are plenty of other big names too. So let's see if it can deliver on the entertainment factor.
 
Last edited:
Oval Invincibles pulled off a thrilling victory over Manchester Originals as the women's Hundred began with a bang at The Oval.

Chasing 136, the Invincibles were 36-4 before South Africa pair Dane van Niekerk and Marizanne Kapp combined for a partnership of 73.

Kapp was brilliantly stumped by Ellie Threkeld for 38 but captain Van Niekerk hit 56 not out to guide her team home.

She hit Kate Cross for four to seal the win with two balls remaining, resulting in wild celebrations from the youthful London crowd - believed to be a record for a domestic women's professional match.

Opening-night thriller tournament has dreamed of
Could the much-debated Hundred have had a better opening night? Almost certainly not.

There were around 7,400 people in attendance, many of those young children and families, and when the home side secured victory there were people dancing in the aisles.

The night began with dramatic fireworks, had DJs and music acts, but by the end everyone at The Oval was engrossed on the cricket - all of it live on BBC Two.

Van Niekerk, who was crucially dropped twice, played brilliantly and showed all of her experience built in a 186-game international career.

The Invincibles needed 16 from the last 10 balls and Mady Villiers hit her England team-mate Sophie Ecclestone for six over long on.

Van Niekerk batted for 42 balls and scored all around the wicket with her only six a powerful sweep off Hartley over mid-wicket
She hit Kate Cross for four at the start of the final set of five balls before Van Niekerk secured the win with an edge wide of the wicketkeeper.

Even in defeat, Manchester's Alex Hartley was smiling, given the occasion.

"I have never been prouder of a women's cricket game," she said, summing the night up perfectly.

"What a night," added Originals captain Cross. "I don't think we can be too disheartened coming off the pitch with an atmosphere like that. Obviously we're disappointed not getting over the line but what a night!"

The same teams open the men's competition on Thursday, also at The Oval.

In truth, it should have been Manchester who notched the first win in cricket's newest format.

Opener Lizelle Lee hit 42 in a decent score batting first and Cross dismissed the Invincibles top three - Georgia Adams, Alice Capsey and Grace Gibbs - with a fine opening spell of the reply.

It was dropped catches that cost the Originals, however.

Harmanpreet Kaur, who earlier made a classy 29, missed a straightforward chance to dismiss Van Niekerk for 28 at mid-off and Kapp was put down on 22 by her South Africa team-mate Mignon du Preez on the boundary - the ball also going for six, adding to Manchester's pain.

With 25 needed from 15 balls there was still time for Hartley to put down Van Niekerk, now on 44, once more. She spilled a mis-hit sweep when fielding near the leg-side boundary.

BBC
 
Why do you say that?

This has the same chance as any other competition in the world.

The problem is availability of key players, and english crickets main stars will only play 2 games each. Give it a few games and the excitement and intrigue of casual fans will die down. It will just become another league in an already heavily saturated market.

The fact that they were throwing tickets away also shows how intrested the everyday cricket fan in england is, as do the comments on any social media post including 100. I hope i am wrong i am all for innovation and trying new things, but covid before and now the issue with players is making it harder and harder for the comp to succeed.
 
The problem is availability of key players, and english crickets main stars will only play 2 games each. Give it a few games and the excitement and intrigue of casual fans will die down. It will just become another league in an already heavily saturated market.

The fact that they were throwing tickets away also shows how intrested the everyday cricket fan in england is, as do the comments on any social media post including 100. I hope i am wrong i am all for innovation and trying new things, but covid before and now the issue with players is making it harder and harder for the comp to succeed.

I think the reason for free tickets is that ECB knows that its a new format and people are not entirely aware of what to expect and its really like free samples you give for your product so that people who like it can buy it. So as its a new cricket product ECB is trying to establish a fan base and market for it. Along with obviously their effort to get full houses, creating the much needed hype from the start.

Some top Eng players not entirely available and the tournament happening at the same time as Eng-Ind test series is definitely not great. That has been the issue with BBL as well which. ECB should have had a separate cricket window ideally for it to have all their main players (In the test squad) available.

However, I guess issue for Aus and ECB is that IPL takes 1.5/2 months of their already tight schedule due to the amount of cricket they play and this possibly couldnt afford much of a window. Still think to make any tournament a premier white ball one, the home team needs their own best players playing it ate last. No white ball international cricket for Eng during the period so thats good as this will allow their whiteball payers to be available for the hundred.
 
This is a joke of a format. I refuse to call it cricket. LOL.

Yes very difficult and complicated format. Doesn’t get the feel of cricket plus the graphics are creating lot of confusion. It seems ECB has overdone a little. Hopefully it clicks
 
The men's tournament starts today, expect viewing figures to be closely followed by the ECB. Yesterday, think they averaged 898k on the bbc, which is decent for a women's match.
 
The ECB should have just created a franchise T20 league and it would have been the second biggest league out there.

The hundred is just a silly idea and its not likely to catch on.
 
Toss: Manchester Originals Men won the toss and decided to field

Oval Invincibles: 1 Jason Roy, 2 Will Jacks, 3 Colin Ingram, 4 Laurie Evans, 5 Sam Billings, 6 Sam Curran 7, Tom Curran, 8 Nathan Sowter, 9 Sunil Narine, 10 Saqib Mahmood, 11 Reece Topley

Manchester Originals: 1 Phil Salt, 2 Jos Buttler, 3 Joe Clarke, 4 Colin Munro, 5 Tom Lammonby, 6 Carlos Brathwaite, 7 Calvin Harrison, 8 Tom Hartley, 9 Fred Klaassen, 10 Steven Finn, 11 Matt Parkinson
 
Screenshot-2021-07-22-23-46-47-711-com-dream11sportsguru.jpg
 
Still can't fathom why they couldn't make the matches in this tournament the conventional 20-overs per side? It's all so contrived that even traditional cricket fans will have a headache trying to understand it.
 
Still can't fathom why they couldn't make the matches in this tournament the conventional 20-overs per side? It's all so contrived that even traditional cricket fans will have a headache trying to understand it.

Because they already have the Blast.
 
Last edited:
dont understand the runrate, this is terrible
 
Pakistani fans used to heavily criticise Azhar Mahmood but it seems he's rated highly as a coach around the world.
At least higher than great Waqar Younis.
 
Oval Invincibles Men win by 9 runs
 
I watched some of it and it's complicated for no particular reason. For the tournament to be successful it needs good weather, lots of 6s and close finishes.
 
This is obviously a very clever marketing decision by ECB.

It is now too late for them to repackage their T20 league into a city-based franchise, effectively copying the IPL like nearly every other country.

Instead of joining Pakistan, Australia, West Indies, South Africa, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka in making an unsuccessful attempt to copy IPL, the invention of The Hundred could have a huge long-term impact.

It basically offers everything that T20 cricket has to offer but in a condensed, modern package.

The emphasis on number of balls rather than overs generates more excitement, and who wouldn’t want to see a Starc or a Bumrah attempting to ball 10 yorkers with Australia or India defending 20 runs in the last 10 balls?

If this format takes off, it could replace T20 cricket in the long run. T20 cricket has absolutely no advantage on this format.

The Hundred is to T20 cricket what the 50 over ODI was to 60 over ODI. The emergence of 50 over ODIs made the 60 overs format obsolete.

I believe there is a very strong chance that the T20 format could evolve into the The Hundred in the long-run at all levels.
 
This is obviously a very clever marketing decision by ECB.

It is now too late for them to repackage their T20 league into a city-based franchise, effectively copying the IPL like nearly every other country.

Instead of joining Pakistan, Australia, West Indies, South Africa, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka in making an unsuccessful attempt to copy IPL, the invention of The Hundred could have a huge long-term impact.

It basically offers everything that T20 cricket has to offer but in a condensed, modern package.

The emphasis on number of balls rather than overs generates more excitement, and who wouldn’t want to see a Starc or a Bumrah attempting to ball 10 yorkers with Australia or India defending 20 runs in the last 10 balls?

If this format takes off, it could replace T20 cricket in the long run. T20 cricket has absolutely no advantage on this format.

The Hundred is to T20 cricket what the 50 over ODI was to 60 over ODI. The emergence of 50 over ODIs made the 60 overs format obsolete.

I believe there is a very strong chance that the T20 format could evolve into the The Hundred in the long-run at all levels.

How can a difference of 20 balls make the world turn upside down? It is not the 120 balls or 100 balls that makes the short form exciting, it is the players and the conditions.

PSL is a huge success based on Pakistan’s market by the way.
 
Last edited:
At the end of it all appears to be a big great conversion from the Imperial system to Metric units!
 
Oval Invincibles edged out Manchester Originals by nine runs as the men's Hundred kicked off in entertaining fashion at The Oval.

After a thrilling opening women's game on Wednesday, the men's opener also went the distance as Manchester chased 146 to win.

After a poor start, Originals' Carlos Brathwaite hit 37 from 29 balls but, with 19 needed from the last five balls, the West Indies international was caught.

Analysis:

It was a fine Invincibles bowling performance which secured the win after captain Sam Billings had earlier hit 49 to lead a recovery from 32-3 to 145-8 from their 100 balls.

This match didn't quite match the drama of the women's opener but it was still another entertaining night at The Oval - the match lit up by nutmegs, diving catches and a pair of brilliant brothers, two of 15 internationals across the two XIs.

Manchester started badly in their chase, England's Phil Salt and Jos Buttler making just four and eight respectively. After 41 balls they were 50-4.

But with Brathwaite at the crease almost anything is possible - as England fans know after he downed Ben Stokes in stunning fashion in the 2016 Twenty20 World Cup final.

Needing 47 runs from the last 20 balls he hit England's Tom Curran for six and the home crowd of 18,126 - another positive attendance at the start of cricket's newest competition - were nervous.

Ultimately, though, it was the other Curran, Sam - Tom's younger brother - who had Brathwaite caught at long-on, leaving the West Indies star to slump from the field dejected, taking Manchester's hopes with him.

At the halfway stage, Manchester were probably favourites after restricting the Invincibles to a below-par score.

Up stepped the Invincibles bowling attack - led by the Currans.

Tom had already impressed the crowd with a nutmeg shot with the bat. With the ball - his now trademark headband on - he bowled the penultimate set of five balls and removed Calvin Harrison, who made 23 from 16 in support of Brathwaite.

Twenty-three-year-old Sam, hair bleached blonde a la Phil Foden, bowled the first five balls and the last five, deceiving the Manchester batters with slower balls, which he later told BBC Sport he has honed with the help of West Indies' all-rounder Dwayne Bravo.

It was was impressive from the two local England internationals, both of whom came through the Surrey academy.

They were supported well by another England international Reece Topley, who had the dangerous Joe Clarke caught behind for 15, and a less well-known name, spinner Nathan Sowter, who chipped in with 2-18.

Buttler, a key member of England's 2019 World Cup-winning team, is one of the most destructive batters in the world at his best.

Here, as he did in England's Twenty20 win over Pakistan on Tuesday, he struggled for fluency.

He only hit one four in his 10 balls - a reverse sweep one ball before he was dismissed.

All of Manchester's star names, skipper Buttler and Salt with the bat, or Matt Parkinson with the ball, had quiet nights.

Buttler will only have one more game in The Hundred before leaving for England duty but the others must find their feet for Manchester to go far.

Sam Billings' knock was crucial. He largely targeted the leg side, hitting two big sixes.

But impressive too was how he marshalled his team in the field. A change in the field helped see off Buttler and he even took a well-timed strategic time out with 10 balls needed and the game in the balance.

"He has just gone about it cleverly," said England Women's World Cup winner and BBC pundit Alex Hartley.

"Buttler hit a reverse sweep, he put that fielder back so Buttler had to go over extra cover and that is where he was caught. Billings has been absolutely outstanding."

Hundred tactics begin to emerge

The game also saw new tactics, brought about by The Hundred's new rules, begin to emerge.

Both Sam Curran and Manchester left-arm spinner Tom Hartley took up the option of bowling 10 consecutive deliveries at the start of each innings.

In Invincibles' batting innings and in an attempt to take advantage of the fielding restrictions, Sam Curran was promoted to open, an unfamiliar position the left-hander who usually bats in the middle order.

He hit a six from his fourth ball but then became Hartley's first victim, bowled by a quicker delivery by the spinner.

Hartley was probably the Originals' most impressive bowler, also dismissing England batter Jason Roy - he was caught brilliantly by Tom Lammonby diving forward in the deep for 20 - and taking 2-20 despite bowling 15 balls in the powerplay and five at the end.

BBC
 
And for those who want to get a feel of this tournament in a visual sense:

Highlights from last night's game:


<div style="width: 100%; height: 0px; position: relative; padding-bottom: 56.250%;"><iframe src="https://streamable.com/e/jzgmvq" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="100%" allowfullscreen style="width: 100%; height: 100%; position: absolute;"></iframe></div>
 
How can a difference of 20 balls make the world turn upside down? It is not the 120 balls or 100 balls that makes the short form exciting, it is the players and the conditions.

PSL is a huge success based on Pakistan’s market by the way.

PSL was established as a competitor to the IPL but it cannot compete with it, in spite of the fact that Pakistan has a huge market of its own. 6 years down the line, it is still struggling to attract world class players in their peaks so I wouldn’t go as far as calling it a huge success.

And as far as 100 balls vs 120 balls are concerned, that is the main point. The difference between the two formats is minimal, but The Hundred is branded in a way that will be more appealing and attractive to the younger fans and future generations.

It has everything that T20 cricket has to offer but in a more condensed and contemporary package.

There is literally nothing that the T20 format offers that you cannot have in The Hundred, and this is why T10 could not, and cannot, compete with T20.

On the contrary, the focus on balls rather than overs makes it more exciting and the added stipulation of one bowler bowling a 10 ball over makes it a superior format than T20. It even has a catchier, “cooler” name that could attract young viewers to the game.

Just like how the 50 over ODI format usurped the 60 over format, there is a strong chance that The Hundred could take over from T20s in the future.

ECB did it with T20s in 2003-2004 and I think they might have done it with The Hundred again. Back then, people doubted the sustainability of the T20 format and didn’t expect it to take-off like it has, and now they are doubting and I dare say repeating the same mistake with The Hundred as well.
 
Despite some minor quips, I quite enjoyed the first match and feel this idea has alot of legs.

The presentation is really cool and visually appealing. While the changes they have made does give you a final product that is fun, easy to understand for the casual viewer and different in certain key characteristics.

The decision to take out 40 balls makes a particular match easily digestible. Average people don't have long attention spans. This change cuts the time of a match by nearly an hour. And allowing bowlers to bowl 10 balls at once gives some little advantage to them which they don't enjoy in T20s.

Credit to the ECB, they have marketed it really well too. That said, the presence of big names is sorely missing. And personally I would have allowed 3 international players per team instead of 2. The run-rate per ball is also a strange concept that makes no sense to me personally. RR per 5 balls makes much more sense.
 
Last edited:
PSL was established as a competitor to the IPL but it cannot compete with it, in spite of the fact that Pakistan has a huge market of its own. 6 years down the line, it is still struggling to attract world class players in their peaks so I wouldn’t go as far as calling it a huge success.

And as far as 100 balls vs 120 balls are concerned, that is the main point. The difference between the two formats is minimal, but The Hundred is branded in a way that will be more appealing and attractive to the younger fans and future generations.

It has everything that T20 cricket has to offer but in a more condensed and contemporary package.

There is literally nothing that the T20 format offers that you cannot have in The Hundred, and this is why T10 could not, and cannot, compete with T20.

On the contrary, the focus on balls rather than overs makes it more exciting and the added stipulation of one bowler bowling a 10 ball over makes it a superior format than T20. It even has a catchier, “cooler” name that could attract young viewers to the game.

Just like how the 50 over ODI format usurped the 60 over format, there is a strong chance that The Hundred could take over from T20s in the future.

ECB did it with T20s in 2003-2004 and I think they might have done it with The Hundred again. Back then, people doubted the sustainability of the T20 format and didn’t expect it to take-off like it has, and now they are doubting and I dare say repeating the same mistake with The Hundred as well.

One of the biggest aspects which I feel quiet a few have overlooked is how the hundred has looked to provide that perfect balance between bat and ball, in this era conditions and rulings have often favoured the batsman, but the hundred gives the bowlers many advantages to including:

- New Batters have to be on strike
- Being able to bowl 10 balls on the trot
- 5 Balls can allow you to be defensive when needed
- Change ends every two sets of 5’ves
- Shorter power play

With anything novel you need to give it time, in any case I find it very intriguing; trying to get to the Edgbaston game today. One thing is for certain, the hype has captured the public’s imagination, am sure where needed the ECB will implement changes.
 
Despite some minor quips, I quite enjoyed the first match and feel this idea has alot of legs.

The presentation is really cool and visually appealing. While the changes they have made does give you a final product that is fun, easy to understand for the casual viewer and different in certain key characteristics.

The decision to take out 40 balls makes a particular match easily digestible. Average people don't have long attention spans. This change cuts the time of a match by nearly an hour. And allowing bowlers to bowl 10 balls at once gives some little advantage to them which they don't enjoy in T20s.

Credit to the ECB, they have marketed it really well too. That said, the presence of big names is sorely missing. And personally I would have allowed 3 international players per team instead of 2. The run-rate per ball is also a strange concept that makes no sense to me personally. RR per 5 balls makes much more sense.

The attention span side of it is always exaggerated, cricket is just too long, you need to book a holiday to watch an ODI ! for us enthusiasts we will go out of our way, but for the casual audience and those with busy lives, even T20 can be a bit of a chore, however a game which ends in under 3 hours and can also be competitive is a lot more convenient imo for example, I could finish work, grab a quick munch and head to the ground / will take me 15 min to get there, start time is about half 6 and the game will end about 9:15pm, then after wards I can go chill maybe go some place nice. For the locals it’s brilliant !
 
The attention span side of it is always exaggerated, cricket is just too long, you need to book a holiday to watch an ODI ! for us enthusiasts we will go out of our way, but for the casual audience and those with busy lives, even T20 can be a bit of a chore, however a game which ends in under 3 hours and can also be competitive is a lot more convenient imo for example, I could finish work, grab a quick munch and head to the ground / will take me 15 min to get there, start time is about half 6 and the game will end about 9:15pm, then after wards I can go chill maybe go some place nice. For the locals it’s brilliant !

You summed up the 100 balls vs. 120 balls debate perfectly.

And while I am a purist of the game, even I have to admit that attention spans of people are getting shorter than ever. And if you are trying to get the attentions of the youth or average people who are simply turned off by the rules, complications and lengths of cricket matches, you have to do something different to capture their imagination. While T20 matches will still draw money, an alternative like this, that exists purely for entertainment and is aimed at the entire population makes sense on a variety of levels.
 
I actually like the hundred , not because of format but due to fact it's cricket and a chance to see next generation of English cricketers.
having said that I am interested to see how the 5 or 10 balls per over will play out
 
The opening men’s match in The Hundred was watched by a peak audience of nearly 2.5m people across Sky and the BBC last night.
With an average audience of nearly 1.5m, Oval Invincibles’ victory over Manchester Originals reached 4.675m (people watching at least 3 minutes), with 37% of viewers being female.
 
I think this is the future but still too long. Match still takes 3 hours, you can't compete with football. It really needs to be down to 2 hours to really appeal to the public. I think they need to find a way to cut it down to that.
 
You summed up the 100 balls vs. 120 balls debate perfectly.

And while I am a purist of the game, even I have to admit that attention spans of people are getting shorter than ever. And if you are trying to get the attentions of the youth or average people who are simply turned off by the rules, complications and lengths of cricket matches, you have to do something different to capture their imagination. While T20 matches will still draw money, an alternative like this, that exists purely for entertainment and is aimed at the entire population makes sense on a variety of levels.

Sometimes they can’t watch a game to begin with, you can argue even footy can be a drag for their span in that case but everyone still watches it. Unless folk have plenty of free time or unemployed / single etc then otherwise they wont go out of their way, the hundred addresses some of these problems so we can move away from the elite / elderly / unemployed / single crowd and attract a wider audience which will be healthy for the growth of our LOI game in the country
 
Sometimes they can’t watch a game to begin with, you can argue even footy can be a drag for their span in that case but everyone still watches it. Unless folk have plenty of free time or unemployed / single etc then otherwise they wont go out of their way, the hundred addresses some of these problems so we can move away from the elite / elderly / unemployed / single crowd and attract a wider audience which will be healthy for the growth of our LOI game in the country

I would even go as far as to say it will be healthy for the growth of the game in general. If people get invested in the sport, its likely that many might seek out not just ODI cricket but Test cricket too. It might not happen with most people but some might be drawn to it.

At the end of the day, there are only positives to the emergence of the Hundred. And who knows, if it gets successful enough, it might one day even challenge the IPL's status as the premier T20 league in the world, eventhough technically it isn't a T20 league.
 
The mens game took 2 hours and 45 minutes

Ah ok, I tuned in and out but thats almost 3 hours. The game is 40 balls shorter than a T20 game...so much for the ECB creating a shorter format of the game which attracts younger viewers...no kid or teenage is sitting through a 2 hour 45 minutes of a sport they don't watch in the first place.
 
Here at the game, looks like they are more interesting in promoting game to the kids and it would backfire
 
Despite some minor quips, I quite enjoyed the first match and feel this idea has alot of legs.

The presentation is really cool and visually appealing. While the changes they have made does give you a final product that is fun, easy to understand for the casual viewer and different in certain key characteristics.

The decision to take out 40 balls makes a particular match easily digestible. Average people don't have long attention spans. This change cuts the time of a match by nearly an hour. And allowing bowlers to bowl 10 balls at once gives some little advantage to them which they don't enjoy in T20s.

Credit to the ECB, they have marketed it really well too. That said, the presence of big names is sorely missing. And personally I would have allowed 3 international players per team instead of 2. The run-rate per ball is also a strange concept that makes no sense to me personally. RR per 5 balls makes much more sense.

Is that true? I only see 5 ball over yesterday (later stage in first innings)
 
Is that true? I only see 5 ball over yesterday (later stage in first innings)

I believe there is a certain limit to it. I think it can be done either once or twice in any given innings by the bowling side. But yes, it is part of the rules.
 
Toss:
Birmingham Phoenix Men won the toss and decided to field

Venue:
Edgbaston, Birmingham

Officials:
Graham Lloyd, Robert Robinson, Neil Bainton, Robert Bailey, Philip Whitticase
 
Birmingham Phoenix

Finn Allen, Miles Hammond, Liam Livingstone, Moeen Ali (capt), Daniel Bell-Drummond, Chris Benjamin, Chris Cooke (wk), Benny Howell, Adam Milne, Tom Helm, Imran Tahir.

London Spirit

Zak Crawley, Josh Inglis (wk), Dan Lawrence, Eoin Morgan (capt), Joe Denly, Ravi Bopara, Mohammad Nabi, Roleof van der Merwe, Blake Cullen, Chris Wood, Mohammad Amir.
 
Last edited:
London Spirit meandering along at 97/4 after 70 balls, will be looking to get at least 150 from here.
 
As I said a few times in the Eng vs Pak whiteball series, Eng’s whiteball talent is really impressive. This tournament will just give some of the backups and young ones that extra exposure as well as platform to make an impression.
 
Adam Milne is a dead-ringer for actor Val Kilmer, who most people may know from his portrayal of Batman in Batman Forever and his performance as Iceman in Top Gun.
 
Its amazing how annoying KP is as a commentator and an analyst. He tries so hard to sound like he is saying something profound but ends up sounding like a high-school jock.
 
Seeing Mascharanas after a long time, thought it was Balaji (side view) lol
 
What. an. over.

Amir bowls 3 wides and a no-ball in a row. Gets absolutely eaten alive by the partisan Birmingham crowd. And then comes back and takes a wicket on the last ball and silences them.

Great bit of fun :vk2
 
Last edited:
Back
Top