Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The whole premise of this thread is dubious.
Virat Kohli will be 30 years old in less than a fortnight, and he has only scored 31 First Class centuries in his life.
He is less than a third of the way to the real landmark. He will have to play til he’s 50 years old to get his hundred hundreds.
Sachin Tendulkar’s so-called hundredth hundred showed what a bogus landmark 100 international centuries is.
An ODI century against Bangladesh on a flat, grassless wicket with no slip fielders and a “wide law” which tells the batsman the bowler’s line is probably worth around a quarter of the value of a First Class century against New South Wales or on a lively track in domestic Pakistan cricket.
If Virat Kohli aspires to recognition for a hundred hundreds he needs to start playing an awful lot more First Class cricket instead of 20 and 50 overs rubbish.
The whole premise of this thread is dubious.
Virat Kohli will be 30 years old in less than a fortnight, and he has only scored 31 First Class centuries in his life.
He is less than a third of the way to the real landmark. He will have to play til he’s 50 years old to get his hundred hundreds.
Sachin Tendulkar’s so-called hundredth hundred showed what a bogus landmark 100 international centuries is.
An ODI century against Bangladesh on a flat, grassless wicket with no slip fielders and a “wide law” which tells the batsman the bowler’s line is probably worth around a quarter of the value of a First Class century against New South Wales or on a lively track in domestic Pakistan cricket.
If Virat Kohli aspires to recognition for a hundred hundreds he needs to start playing an awful lot more First Class cricket instead of 20 and 50 overs rubbish.
The whole premise of this thread is dubious.
Virat Kohli will be 30 years old in less than a fortnight, and he has only scored 31 First Class centuries in his life.
He is less than a third of the way to the real landmark. He will have to play til he’s 50 years old to get his hundred hundreds.
Sachin Tendulkar’s so-called hundredth hundred showed what a bogus landmark 100 international centuries is.
An ODI century against Bangladesh on a flat, grassless wicket with no slip fielders and a “wide law” which tells the batsman the bowler’s line is probably worth around a quarter of the value of a First Class century against New South Wales or on a lively track in domestic Pakistan cricket.
If Virat Kohli aspires to recognition for a hundred hundreds he needs to start playing an awful lot more First Class cricket instead of 20 and 50 overs rubbish.
The whole premise of this thread is dubious.
Virat Kohli will be 30 years old in less than a fortnight, and he has only scored 31 First Class centuries in his life.
He is less than a third of the way to the real landmark. He will have to play til he’s 50 years old to get his hundred hundreds.
Sachin Tendulkar’s so-called hundredth hundred showed what a bogus landmark 100 international centuries is.
An ODI century against Bangladesh on a flat, grassless wicket with no slip fielders and a “wide law” which tells the batsman the bowler’s line is probably worth around a quarter of the value of a First Class century against New South Wales or on a lively track in domestic Pakistan cricket.
If Virat Kohli aspires to recognition for a hundred hundreds he needs to start playing an awful lot more First Class cricket instead of 20 and 50 overs rubbish.
Tbh I’ve just spent the last half an hour thinking about this and have come to the realisation that despite having scored dozens of centuries against the best bowlers in the world, Kohli would really struggle to get the red ball off the square against a team of 19-year-old students who only play one or two first class matches a year.
Maybe Junaids was right after all…![]()
The whole premise of this thread is dubious.
Virat Kohli will be 30 years old in less than a fortnight, and he has only scored 31 First Class centuries in his life.
He is less than a third of the way to the real landmark. He will have to play til he’s 50 years old to get his hundred hundreds.
Sachin Tendulkar’s so-called hundredth hundred showed what a bogus landmark 100 international centuries is.
An ODI century against Bangladesh on a flat, grassless wicket with no slip fielders and a “wide law” which tells the batsman the bowler’s line is probably worth around a quarter of the value of a First Class century against New South Wales or on a lively track in domestic Pakistan cricket.
If Virat Kohli aspires to recognition for a hundred hundreds he needs to start playing an awful lot more First Class cricket instead of 20 and 50 overs rubbish.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Guwahati. Visakhapatnam. Pune.<br><br>Virat Kohli is something else man with three ODI hundreds in a row, the first India batsman to achieve that .. what a great run machine he is ..<br>Keep it up cross 120 hundred mark as I set up for you ..</p>— Shoaib Akhtar (@shoaib100mph) <a href="https://twitter.com/shoaib100mph/status/1056245811145773058?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 27, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
As I set up for you![]()
How many does he have right now?
That's insane no. of tons on Aussie soil in just 7 yrs!11th century on Aussie soil![]()
Considering he is having a pretty ordinary Australia tour this time... just 2 centuries in test+ ODI.
64 centuries now, wow. Time for him to step up in this years World Cup and not crumble under pressure.
Yup like Waqar and Akhtar, Waqar esp coz Jadeja smacked his famous yorkers, luckily for Virat at least he has a WC to his name.
Exactly, that's what separated Wasim from Waqar and Akhtar.
I think he'll fall just short - he won't play until he's 40 years old like Tendulkar did. Kohli will most likely call it quits after the world cup in India when he'll be ~35. So to get to 100 he'll need 7-8 x 100s each and every year until his retirement. Sure that's been achievable in his late 20s but can he do it in his mid 30s?
I think he'll fall just short - he won't play until he's 40 years old like Tendulkar did. Kohli will most likely call it quits after the world cup in India when he'll be ~35. So to get to 100 he'll need 7-8 x 100s each and every year until his retirement. Sure that's been achievable in his late 20s but can he do it in his mid 30s?
Unless Kohli suffers an absolutely shocking decline in form or God forbid suffer a serious injury, nothing to happen.
With advancements in sports science and Kohli s own insane fitness regime, I'd not be surprised if he plays well beyond 40.
Agreed if has has the hunger and drive he can definitely play beyond 40.
Kohli turning 40 is a decade away and Indian fans can hope BCCI would turn ruthless and professional enough in that time to not allow superstar syndrome holding Indian cricket hostage.
Whether Kohli plays beyond 40 shouldn't be his decision to make, as it is currently the case with Dhoni.
100 is too less for him![]()
He will score at least 150
He will overtake Tendulkar's centuries tally but will definitely retire before 40.
Before 40? Nah! He's not Dhoni! Kohli would probably retire after 2023 WC! Not because his passion would die by 2023, but he sure knows when to call it quits! We would get to witness Kohli the Legend for the next 3 or 4 years mostly!
He is going to retire after the 2027 World Cup. 8 years is more than enough for him to score another 50 hundreds. In the last year or so, has alluded multiple times that he still has 7-8 years left.
Honestly, my only worry is quality, not quantity. His decline and temporary loss of form will have a definite impact in the future. However, I recon 2019 will be his WC.
Time will tell...
He should maintain his dominance till 33-34 at least, but he is inevitably going to have dip at the end of his career like every player.
2023 World Cup will be in India and he will be 34. Something very bizarre and unexpected needs to happen for him to miss that tournament.
He has high standards. I personally think he won't stick around like when his performances fail.
He has high standards. I personally think he won't stick around like Sachin and Dhoni when his performances fail. Being an alpha male, he will never play just as a batsman after losing captaincy like Dhoni did.
Dhoni resigned from captaincy when he was still a very good batsman, only because he felt it was better for the team if Kohli takes over the reigns.
Dhoni resigned from captaincy when he was still a very good batsman, only because he felt it was better for the team if Kohli takes over the reigns.
A hyperbole. I've my doubts over him playing WC '23, forget about WC '27.He is going to retire after the 2027 World Cup. 8 years is more than enough for him to score another 50 hundreds. In the last year or so, has alluded multiple times that he still has 7-8 years left.
Can you mind read or did Tendulkar tell you that personally?Tendulkar played 20-30 tests more that he should have but he chose to pursue further milestones such as 100th international ton and 200 test caps at a cost of 3-4 runs in his test batting average.
A hyperbole. I've my doubts over him playing WC '23, forget about WC '27.
A hyperbole. I've my doubts over him playing WC '23, forget about WC '27.
Yes guys, ignore all the historic, economic facts and predict how '100% intense' Virat would quit in 4 years time. LMAO.
He's playing all formats till 2027 guaranteed barring a career ending injury.
Nor will he retire on his own. He'd have to be forced out too with an acceptable exit strategy much like Dhoni.
Take it to the bank.
35 isn't too old but the kind of intensity with which he plays, no. of games he plays, kind of back breaking responsibility on him to carry his team on his own, I doubt whether he'll have anything left in tank after 3-4 years max.He would be about 35, and thats not too old for batsman, especially with his fitness.
And WC '23 is in India. India will be one of the favourites. Would not make sense for him to retire before that.
Also, the way he is talking about test cricket, I have a feeling he will retire from ODIs after the WC '23 and continue to play tests for a couple of years. That might allow him 2 more rounds of away tours of SENA countries.
Can you mind read or did Tendulkar tell you that personally?
200 test caps milestone, lol....
Yes guys, ignore all the historic, economic facts and predict how '100% intense' Virat would quit in 4 years time. LMAO.
He's playing all formats till 2027 guaranteed barring a career ending injury.
Nor will he retire on his own. He'd have to be forced out too with an acceptable exit strategy much like Dhoni.
Take it to the bank.
Nor will he retire on his own. He'd have to be forced out too with an acceptable exit strategy much like Dhoni.
I repeat my question, did Tendulkar himself tell you that he was gunning for becoming most capped test cricketer so that the record doesn't get broken, ever?200 test caps is a milestone as he's the most capped cricketer in the history of test cricket. A record which I don't think will ever be broken.
So in future I advise you to think before you spaz out on the keyboard.
Yeah, I do think so too.I might be one of the minority but i think his intensity has decreased slightly since Eng. So, maybe the start of his slow down.