Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
bublubhuyan said:Even you started calling him Krapich.
Sheikh said:Krapich holding the order together!
Because he's krap.bublubhuyan said:What's the matter ? Why are all of you calling him Krapich ?
Good bounce and carry through to the keeper. Not much movement through the air, but there's some life in the pitch if the bowlers put it in the right areas.OZGOD said:Anyone know what the pitch is doing?
Because he is krap and its fun !bublubhuyan said:Even you started calling him Krapich.
Milroastnescafe said:Remember, we aren't Pakistan, we field players who are actually half capable with the bat.
Milroastnescafe said:That 'Wahab' lad who is supposedly the next destroyer of Australian batting lineups, what were his figures like? Impressive i'd imagine.
This is pathetic stuff... disgracefulOZGOD said:LAWLZ
34.2 Bravo to Symonds, no run, what's this now? Bravo slips in another short one down leg stump, Symonds shapes to half-leave, half-tickle it fine and the ball clips the inside of his glove before Ramdin takes a good catch down the leg side, they all ask the question but umpire Benson is unmoved ... oh ho ho, replays show ball did indeed make contact with the gloves, and Symonds stands his ground, much to the crowd's displeasure, so West Indies can feel hard done
I kind of feel sorry for WI now to be honest, but geez Symmo's a pretty lucky kind of bloke...
12thMan said:spinner Benn on in 39th over. Symonds hits him for 2 fours to take his average to 47. now he has to stay not out or double the score to stay there
OZGOD said:Symmo usually scores a ton after being the beneficiary of a favourable call.
bublubhuyan said:Man, Australia still is the best team, but the dominance they enjoyed for almost a decade have started to perish. They way Australia used to dominate from 1999 till recently was mind-boggling.
This is the West Indies of old!Easa said:West Indies are beast
Let's harass these Aussies proper, lets take these three wickets quickly
DM said:Guys serious question - Colin Croft's moustache in the Sky Sports studio right now - why has he drawn it on?
) ) you absolute drunk elephant )DM said:Guys serious question - Colin Croft's moustache in the Sky Sports studio right now - why has he drawn it on?
This is plain and simple abuse of the AussiesDM said:This is the West Indies of old!
Violent bowling
OZGOD said:I will leave off abusing Krapich for an entire day if he gets us to a competitive first innings total
12thMan said:53.2 Edwards to Lee, no run, bouncer greets Lee
55.3 Edwards to Lee, no run, short one testing Lee this time
55.4 Edwards to Lee, no run, another shorter one
55.5 Edwards to Lee, no run, short one follows Lee again
He didn't in the first or second test. I forget which one he got hit couple of times. I think he only bowled to Edwards couple of balls in that match but didn't do anythingRandom Aussie said:Good stuff Fidel, Lee will be dishing it out in the WI innings
OZGOD said:LAWLZ
34.2 Bravo to Symonds, no run, what's this now? Bravo slips in another short one down leg stump, Symonds shapes to half-leave, half-tickle it fine and the ball clips the inside of his glove before Ramdin takes a good catch down the leg side, they all ask the question but umpire Benson is unmoved ... oh ho ho, replays show ball did indeed make contact with the gloves, and Symonds stands his ground, much to the crowd's displeasure, so West Indies can feel hard done
I kind of feel sorry for WI now to be honest, but geez Symmo's a pretty lucky kind of bloke...
OZGOD said:Why did Symmo walk? Should have asked for a replay!
Ladies and Gentlemen, Test cricket.12thMan said:53.2 Edwards to Lee, no run, bouncer greets Lee
55.3 Edwards to Lee, no run, short one testing Lee this time
55.4 Edwards to Lee, no run, another shorter one
55.5 Edwards to Lee, no run, short one follows Lee again
Inswinging Yorker said:lucky yes but also very poor sportsmanship
OZGOD said:Name for me a current WI player on your team who regularly walks when given not out?
CricnPak said:That's the problem mate...it's a proven fact that umpires favour the dominating team more often than not. WI players don't have the choice to walk because they're given out everytime they have a shout against them concerning an LBW or nick. Most of the decisions that need made between the two sides are nearly always against the WI (unless it's so obviously plumb, my grandmother would give it out). I still remember Pakistan's complaints against the umpires during are last series against Australia (something like 29 decisions in your favor as opposed to our 5). So yeah, fair play is welcome - only if both sides are willing to make the sacrifice for the good. In this series, you're in no position to put the WI players in this.
Random Aussie said:That was alleged by Bob Woolmer, it is not a fact.
deathstreak said:That is true but lets face it umpires always tend to give decisions which favor the dominant teams usually. You don't have to look at Australia Vs Some other country for that. Take a look at club cricket as well
OZGOD said:It's the umpire's job to give someone out though. Name for me a current WI player on your team who regularly walks when given not out?