What's new

What are your views about the Kashmir issue?

Kashmiris acknowledged the Chatham House poll was a joke. Flawed. Full of bias.

Social media videos and news have transformed EVERYTHING.

Kashmir longs for Pakistan.
 
To be very honest, I'm not a very knowledgeable person when it comes to all this, but there are a few things that I do know.. About justifyig that Muhammed Ayub Pandit killing, I didn't say everyone did that - I know so many people condemned it, but a lot (and I mean a LOT) of people also justified it and their views were truly horrific, I must tell you I was shocked to read all that.... (they called themselves "Pro-Kashmiri" - is this the Kashmiriyat we talk about?) That is really alarming.....

Do you know why I was brought up in Pune and not Srinagar? Why I can't even speak Koshur? Remember 1989..? You can deny all you want, but you can't fool me, my own family was affected, my parents still remember the hardships they faced... Why would we abandon our property, land, jobs for no reason?

Zaafal Chrungoo, a fellow Kashmiri on quora:
https://www.quora.com/Kashmir-Whats-the-story-of-the-Kashmiri-Pandits/answer/Zaafal-Chrungoo

I haven't replied on those things I'm not much aware of....
But I feel militancy is never the right way to deal with anything. I also wonder why is it just one group that's into militancy, one group that protests against everything.... Why not the others? How can the region be demilitarized when there's militancy/terrorism all around? I know everyone isn't guilty of disrespecting minorities and those people who hold a view different from the one they expect, but the thing is there are so many (a really big number) who do (and their views are truly horrific, it's difficult to imagine how they can even think of fellow human beings in such a manner just because they do not conform to their beliefs)..

http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/lehladakh-people-demand-union-territory-status-submit-memorandum-to-pm-narendra-modi/

I can tell from your posts that you are a good person and you ain't anything like those people and I know you have lots of reasons for your choices, but the number of those people I told you about really worries me.... The youth should be focusing on education and development of the region, but so many of them seem so misguided and there's just so much hate in them!

Nice to know that u r a KP...
I just request u to ask ua parents who was responsible for the ouster of your family from their homeland.... do tell me wat they say....

The pain KP's have suffered is massive.... it just hurts me so much when i hear wat u guys had to go through.... I have got a lot of friends who are KP and actually my father and a KP migrant are business patners since last 30 years and his sons and i have a great understanding.... that is why i know a lot abt the tragedy u hav been part of...

My humble request for u is to read these two books:-
1. The garden of solitude, by siddhartha gigoo
2. Curfewed nights, by basharat peer
one a KP who narrates his story and one a Kashmiri Muslim narrating his own....i hope u read them....
It is great that u didn't comment about the issues i raised and acknowledged u hav no knowledge about them..... unlike other who keep on saying fantasies...

I dont see GUN as a solution and simply don't believe it will yield anything but we need support from everywhere, from indians as well.
 
Wonder why these Kashmiris bother applying for posts advertised by the evil Indian Army.

http://www.firstpost.com/india/kash...ouths-apply-for-army-recruitment-3372888.html

would have been better if u know how thats actually done.....
in 2016 a hardcore BJP leader was sent to kashmir.... and he came with a report my heart pains seeing wat kashmiris are facing and going through.... his name was yashwant sinha...
similarly the fact finding teams and ministers said similar lines in 2008 and 2010 when they were sent to kashmir to ascertain wat can be done to stop the unrest......
even hardcore nationalist people melt when they come to kashmir and see wat we are facing.....
just spent 15 days in kashmir and see wat reality is....
OR just watch some documentary made my indian production houses or indians or by some foriegners.... read them SIR
 
Kashmiris acknowledged the Chatham House poll was a joke. Flawed. Full of bias.

Social media videos and news have transformed EVERYTHING.

Kashmir longs for Pakistan.

Biased towards who? The study was scathing towards India - hence why they tried so hard to discredit it. Both Indians and Pakistanis state that the study is flawed and biased against them - sounds like the researchers were doing something right after all given they managed to **** off both sides.
 
Biased towards who? The study was scathing towards India - hence why they tried so hard to discredit it. Both Indians and Pakistanis state that the study is flawed and biased against them - sounds like the researchers were doing something right after all given they managed to **** off both sides.

Flawed. Studies are pointless. Hold a referendum. End of.
 
Nothing will change. India is too powerful to let go Kashmir. Its just a pipe dream for many people who want to see Kashmir join Pakistan.

The only way Pak can get Kashmir is if Pak decisively wins a war against India. But Pak does not have the military hardware nor the technology to over power India.

Bottom line is, India will keep Indian Kashmir and Pak will keep Pak Kashmir.
 
Last edited:
Nothing will change. India is too powerful to let go Kashmir. Its just a pipe dream for many people who want to see Kashmir join Pakistan.

The only way Pak can get Kashmir is if Pak decisively wins a war against India. But Pak does not have the military hardware nor the technology to over power India.

Bottom line is, India will keep Indian Kashmir and Pak will keep Pak Kashmir.

Never in history have an oppresssed people remain oppressed. India won't always have Hindu extremists in power.

There will come a day when India will themselves allow Kashmir to be free.
 
Pakistani Military has invested a lot in Kashmir...more so than the Indians. And I'm not talking about dollars...I don't think the issue will be resolved soon. All I know is Pakistan is not going to let go easily, India will have to compromise some where otherwise this confrontation will continue on, like it has.
 
Never in history have an oppresssed people remain oppressed. India won't always have Hindu extremists in power.

There will come a day when India will themselves allow Kashmir to be free.

Keep dreaming.

Losing Kashmir will cause many more separatist movement gather momentum. Sets a dangerous precedent.

Kashmir has many improtant Hindu pilgrimage sites. India will never let it go.

As some poster said, unless Pak defeats India decisively in an all out war and India disintegrates into several small countries, Kashmir will be part of India. But Pak Military does not have it in them to take on India in a conventional war. So whatever be the views of people, Kashmir will remain part of India whether Kashmiris like it or not. Its a fact.
 
Keep dreaming.

Losing Kashmir will cause many more separatist movement gather momentum. Sets a dangerous precedent.

Kashmir has many improtant Hindu pilgrimage sites. India will never let it go.

As some poster said, unless Pak defeats India decisively in an all out war and India disintegrates into several small countries, Kashmir will be part of India. But Pak Military does not have it in them to take on India in a conventional war. So whatever be the views of people, Kashmir will remain part of India whether Kashmiris like it or not. Its a fact.

There will be no major conventional war as both are now nuclear powers. Kargil was a one off, no two nuclear armed nations have ever gone to war.

Do you really think people will remain oppressed forever? Believe it if it gives you peace of mind.
 
Keep dreaming.

Losing Kashmir will cause many more separatist movement gather momentum. Sets a dangerous precedent.

Kashmir has many improtant Hindu pilgrimage sites. India will never let it go.

As some poster said, unless Pak defeats India decisively in an all out war and India disintegrates into several small countries, Kashmir will be part of India. But Pak Military does not have it in them to take on India in a conventional war. So whatever be the views of people, Kashmir will remain part of India whether Kashmiris like it or not. Its a fact.

Delusional. Kashmir getting independence is inevitable if not imminent (and I think its imminent).
 
There will be no major conventional war as both are now nuclear powers. Kargil was a one off, no two nuclear armed nations have ever gone to war.

Do you really think people will remain oppressed forever? Believe it if it gives you peace of mind.

Oppressed?

India does not get any pleasure in oppressing Kashmiris. Kashmir is part of India just like a Manipur or Rajasthan or Karnataka or Punjab. As long as Kashmiris do not demand freedom or join Pakistan, Indian army will not use force.

It gives me peace of mind thinking that Kashmiris will be oppressed forever. :facepalm: What people who are pro-separatists need to realize that this is not India or 1950's or 60's. India has changed a lot and it is a South Asian super power. Not even China can twist its arm completely. So forget Pakistan. Separatists are like pests. India will tolerate them and from time to time destroy them.

India is perfectly adept at playing this game for decades to come. It has the money and muscle to do it for a long long time.
 
Oppressed?

India does not get any pleasure in oppressing Kashmiris. Kashmir is part of India just like a Manipur or Rajasthan or Karnataka or Punjab. As long as Kashmiris do not demand freedom or join Pakistan, Indian army will not use force.

It gives me peace of mind thinking that Kashmiris will be oppressed forever. :facepalm: What people who are pro-separatists need to realize that this is not India or 1950's or 60's. India has changed a lot and it is a South Asian super power. Not even China can twist its arm completely. So forget Pakistan. Separatists are like pests. India will tolerate them and from time to time destroy them.

India is perfectly adept at playing this game for decades to come. It has the money and muscle to do it for a long long time.

Indian forces have raped schoolgirls. Shows how much pleasure they get from oppressing people. What crimes did they do to deserve such treatment?

If this oppression carries on for decades as you proudly claim, then those people will resort to attacking your beloved army, which isnt even fed properly by your state.

A lot of things can change in decades and will.
 
Indian forces have raped schoolgirls. Shows how much pleasure they get from oppressing people. What crimes did they do to deserve such treatment?

If this oppression carries on for decades as you proudly claim, then those people will resort to attacking your beloved army, which isnt even fed properly by your state.

A lot of things can change in decades and will.

Lot of allegations by you.
One thing that is sure is that Kashmir will be part of India. India will only get stronger economically and militarily by the decade.
So somehow India imploding or weakening will remain a pipe dream for some. Dreams are free and cheap. All you need is lie down and close your eyes.

Regarding people attacking our beloved army, well India knows how to handle them. We have been doing it for decades now. We can do it for many more decades to come.
 
Lot of allegations by you.

Human Rights Watch, Amnesty and many media outlets have reported this. Over 1000 cases were registered in Kashmir and some figures suggest around 300 women and children have been subjected to such abuses on a yearly basis. Indian security forces have not been held accountable.

ne thing that is sure is that Kashmir will be part of India. India will only get stronger economically and militarily by the decade.
So somehow India imploding or weakening will remain a pipe dream for some. Dreams are free and cheap. All you need is lie down and close your eyes.

Regarding people attacking our beloved army, well India knows how to handle them. We have been doing it for decades now. We can do it for many more decades to come.

Your only argument is this is all a dream.

They can deal with it as they are doing now by employing hundreds of thousands of security personell which continue to oppress vunerable people by various methods including murder, torture, rape, cerfews, denying of basic human rights.

Are you actually proud of the above methods?
 
For all those advocating referendum -- why you do need it? Those who love Pak can move and go settle in Pak. Those who love India can move to India. Those who want independence can keep fighting (no one gets independence for free -- India had to fight with Brits for 150 years to earn her independence.)

You have to separate the people problem from the land problem. People problem is easy to solve -- folks can move wherever their loyalties lie. Land problem will take its own time to solve, but people don't need to wait for it.
 
One thing i never undersood. Why do posters here vouch for an independant kashmir? Why not let pakistan take it and exploit its resources(before you bash me, inreality this is what every country does)
 
You're right. India's government have no human rights. Illegally and brutally occupying my land and people. Shameless and disgusting. #goindiago

Everyone acknowledges India as a force for good. Kashmiri terrorists, who are brutally killing innocent policemen and security personnel, and hurting their families, have lost the narrative.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Everyone acknowledges India as a force for good. Kashmiri terrorists, who are brutally killing innocent policemen and security personnel, and hurting their families, have lost the narrative.

The occupying animals of India's government will be kicked out. Can't wait till that occurrs. Those who commit injustices will always end up on the wrong side of history.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
One thing i never undersood. Why do posters here vouch for an independant kashmir? Why not let pakistan take it and exploit its resources(before you bash me, inreality this is what every country does)

Every country is 'exploited' in some way, either by it's own people or foreign.

Independence was the way forward so that they were recognised as a sovereign nation(South Kashmir) and could make their own trade deals and ideally benefit from both Indian and Pakistani economies. If this was done without Indian hostility it would have brought peace to the region because Pakistan would too resume trade relations with India because their main source of dispute would be resolved.

I know my next opinion is idealistic and will draw criticism but Kashmir independence cannot work under current circumstances. It needs an India that is willing to let it go amicably for a prosperous future. So I think right now the best solution is for those Kashmiris to seek a truce and remain with India but conditional on the basis that India be obligated to a referendum in the future.

Quite a few things complicate this right now. India has a very Hindu-centric government right now with Modi. Kashmiri politicians are corrupt. Pakistan wants to be involved and India rightly under international treaties tells them where to go.
 
Everyone acknowledges India as a force for good. Kashmiri terrorists, who are brutally killing innocent policemen and security personnel, and hurting their families, have lost the narrative.

I'm not sure who you mean by everyone. But no, India is no longer a force for good. Ask the millions impoverished in the country itself if they think that. Maybe the fear of uber patriotic Indians would cause them to say it openly but covertly it'd be a different story.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm not sure who you mean by everyone. But no, India is no longer a force for good. Ask the millions impoverished in the country itself if they think that. Maybe the fear of uber patriotic Indians would cause them to say it openly but covertly it'd be a different story.

By everyone, I meant the broader international community. To more extent or less, the developed Western democratic world (US, Canada, Japan, South Korea, Western Europe, Australia) acknowledges India as an up-and-coming democratic country they all want to have a good relationship with. And none of these countries have even a moment to spare for these so called Kashmiri "freedom fighters" (in reality they are terrorists). They all agree with the Indian narrative and consider India a force for good.

As for the impoverished millions, what does that have anything to do with Kashmir? Poverty is an economic reality and needs an economic / social answer. Over the past 20 years, 300-400M people in India have moved from utter poverty to middle-class life. More needs to be done, but that's an ongoing process. Giving Kashmire "freedom" won't solve the problem of poverty!
 
The occupying animals of India's government will be kicked out. Can't wait till that occurrs. Those who commit injustices will always end up on the wrong side of history.

When? Do you have a timeline in mind?

Looks like you couldn't wait to "escape" your dear mother land and enjoy the freedom the UK provides. So clearly you don't believe that this is going to happen in your lifetime. Otherwise you would have waited, no?
 
By everyone, I meant the broader international community. To more extent or less, the developed Western democratic world (US, Canada, Japan, South Korea, Western Europe, Australia) acknowledges India as an up-and-coming democratic country they all want to have a good relationship with. And none of these countries have even a moment to spare for these so called Kashmiri "freedom fighters" (in reality they are terrorists). They all agree with the Indian narrative and consider India a force for good.

Let's be honest here, countries only see each within an economic context, except when it comes to the Anglo sphere where they have a greater context for their relationship. That won't be the case with India. India is a cash cow for their investors right now and if Pakistan gets its political act together they'd be seen in exactly the same light.

I also don't think these countries know enough about the atrocities committed by India because of the lack of Kashmiri voices able to raise their concerns. Even so, acknowledging international law they'd consider it an internal matter. But that does not mean they see it as a force for good. Britain and America have closer relationships with Saudi and that should explain in which context international relationships are based.



As for the impoverished millions, what does that have anything to do with Kashmir? Poverty is an economic reality and needs an economic / social answer. Over the past 20 years, 300-400M people in India have moved from utter poverty to middle-class life. More needs to be done, but that's an ongoing process. Giving Kashmire "freedom" won't solve the problem of poverty!

I never said Kashmiri freedom would end poverty. That's absurd. What I was referring to was your use of the indefinite pronoun of 'everyone' and you've clarified that above, so best leave it there.
 
I never said Kashmiri freedom would end poverty. That's absurd. What I was referring to was your use of the indefinite pronoun of 'everyone' and you've clarified that above, so best leave it there.

I agree that countries frame their relationships in the context of their own agenda (economic and otherwise). This is what explains the good relationship between the democratic US and the jihadi regime in Saudi Arabia. What I find disingenuous in your argument is that you're hoping that India will somehow lose her economic heft in the future (or perhaps Pak will overtake it?) and therefore would be easier for Pak to shape the agenda in Kashmir. That's *never* going to happen. Just look at the trajectory and visualize the world in next next 20-25 years.

India is currently held back by the fact that 400-500M people are still in poverty. That problem is going to solve itself in next 20-25 years. Basically India today is where China was 20 year ago. Look at China today -- no one takes panga with it. And its power is growing by leaps and bounds each year. India will be in the same spot 10-15 years from now. So, if anything, it will become increasingly easier for India to shape the narrative in Kashmir (like it has over the last 10-15 years) and the world will agree with us.

There was a time when some Islamic countries used to openly support Pak on Kashmir. That number has dwindled down to low single digits now, and will eventually become zero. Their voices have become muted and shifty. Nowadays when Nawaz brings up Kashmir in the UN, he's met with an empty hall and those who are in the room are found yawning!

Time to wake up and smell the coffee.
 
I agree that countries frame their relationships in the context of their own agenda (economic and otherwise). This is what explains the good relationship between the democratic US and the jihadi regime in Saudi Arabia. What I find disingenuous in your argument is that you're hoping that India will somehow lose her economic heft in the future (or perhaps Pak will overtake it?) and therefore would be easier for Pak to shape the agenda in Kashmir. That's *never* going to happen. Just look at the trajectory and visualize the world in next next 20-25 years.

India is currently held back by the fact that 400-500M people are still in poverty. That problem is going to solve itself in next 20-25 years. Basically India today is where China was 20 year ago. Look at China today -- no one takes panga with it. And its power is growing by leaps and bounds each year. India will be in the same spot 10-15 years from now. So, if anything, it will become increasingly easier for India to shape the narrative in Kashmir (like it has over the last 10-15 years) and the world will agree with us.

There was a time when some Islamic countries used to openly support Pak on Kashmir. That number has dwindled down to low single digits now, and will eventually become zero. Their voices have become muted and shifty. Nowadays when Nawaz brings up Kashmir in the UN, he's met with an empty hall and those who are in the room are found yawning!

Time to wake up and smell the coffee.

There's nothing ingenuous in my argument because you've inferred something from nothing. I haven't said anything about India being behind Pakistan econotmically, it'll actually be an established economy whilst Pakistan will be emerging.

Now I'm no economic expert, but investors prefer growing/emerging markets more than stagnant ones and there's always a limit to growth. During that time the world will pay some lip service to Pakistan as it is to India right now. This of course can only happen if Pakistan have a competent leader, which is why Nawaz, who's so loved by India, must go.

The rest of your post about India's poverty and economic supremacy is mostly optimistic conjecture. I will say this, India's stubbornness with regards to Kashmir will have a massive impact on Indian society as a whole. The absence of morality and reason with India's stance on Kashmir will lead to exremism and it might not be 'Islamist extremism' we're talking about in 20 years time but Hindutva extremists.
 
Last edited:
There's nothing ingenuous in my argument because you've inferred something from nothing. I haven't said anything about India being behind Pakistan econotmically, it'll actually be an established economy whilst Pakistan will be emerging.

Now I'm no economic expert, but investors prefer growing/emerging markets more than stagnant ones and there's always a limit to growth. During that time the world will pay some lip service to Pakistan as it is to India right now. This of course can only happen if Pakistan have a competent leader, which is why Nawaz, who's so loved by India, must go.

The rest of your post about India's poverty and economic supremacy is mostly optimistic conjecture. I will say this, India's stubbornness with regards to Kashmir will have a massive impact on Indian society as a whole. The absence of morality and reason with India's stance on Kashmir will lead to exremism and it might not be 'Islamist extremism' we're talking about in 20 years time but Hindutva extremists.

Interesting. First you bring the concept of poverty in the Kashmir thread, and now you're running away from it.

You accuse me of being overly optimistic about India's future but you do exactly the same for Pakistan!

All I'm saying is India just needs to repeat what it did for last 20 years, and project that into next 25 years -- and extreme poverty will basically go away. And mind you, it's a lot easier to grow on a baseline of 2 trillion economy (which is India today) than on an economy of $500 billion (which is what India was in the 80s). This is exactly what the Chinese experience shows. Also, I don't know why you think India will stagnate. India's current per capita GDP is $5K. There are many countries in the Western world operating at $30-50K. China is $10-12K. So there is a huge upside that's not yet tapped.

On the other hand, Pakistan has a steeper climb back into normalcy. Currently it's highly talibanized and getting rid of snakes in your backyard is not going to be easy. If I were a betting man, I'd feel a lot more confident about India continuing her growth trajectory as opposed to the scenario you're dreaming about.

And why should what we do with Kashmir (a mere 50 lakh population) impact what happens to the rest of the country (a nation of 1.25 billion). For India, Kashmir is nothing more than a nuisance. It's a problem that needs to be managed, which it has been doing for last 70 years.
 
Interesting. First you bring the concept of poverty in the Kashmir thread, and now you're running away from it.


I don't know if this is deliberate or just a lack of comprehension about what I wrote. I mentioned poverty because you said "everyone sees India as a force for good". My point was how can that be if parts of your own populace doesn't. You then clarified 'everyone' to be Western Democratic governments. Case closed.


You accuse me of being overly optimistic about India's future but you do exactly the same for Pakistan!

I'm not at all optimistic about Pakistan's future, we're both discussing hypothetical scenarios, because if truth be told, we don't even know what's going to happen by the end of year with Trump, Putin and Brexit all making matters more uncertain.

All I'm saying is India just needs to repeat what it did for last 20 years, and project that into next 25 years -- and extreme poverty will basically go away. And mind you, it's a lot easier to grow on a baseline of 2 trillion economy (which is India today) than on an economy of $500 billion (which is what India was in the 80s). This is exactly what the Chinese experience shows. Also, I don't know why you think India will stagnate. India's current per capita GDP is $5K. There are many countries in the Western world operating at $30-50K. China is $10-12K. So there is a huge upside that's not yet tapped.

I have to admit I'm not up to date with the figures of either country, but I do know that India is economically slightly better off at the moment

On the other hand, Pakistan has a steeper climb back into normalcy. Currently it's highly talibanized and getting rid of snakes in your backyard is not going to be easy. If I were a betting man, I'd feel a lot more confident about India continuing her growth trajectory as opposed to the scenario you're dreaming about.

As I've mentioned previously, India has a growing problem of its own and it's powered by Modi's government at the moment. Hindutva ideology is not going to disappear any time soon as we've see with the beef ban and growing tensions with Indian Muslims. A change in leadership in both countries can make a difference either way.


And why should what we do with Kashmir (a mere 50 lakh population) impact what happens to the rest of the country (a nation of 1.25 billion). For India, Kashmir is nothing more than a nuisance. It's a problem that needs to be managed, which it has been doing for last 70 years.


"It's a problem that needs to be managed, which it has been doing for last 70 years."

This is the impact it's already having. You've called it a problem for over 70 years and that's before the 'terrorists' existed. You're probably an educated bloke and you can not rise above the hate to seek a meaningful peace in Kashmir, what chance does the average villager have?

God forbid it but this has every chance of leading to a Kashmiri ethnocide/genocide as tensions are continually rising. When a society becomes uber patriotic it becomes proud of being nasty, the repercussions have an impact within that society, Nazism being case in point.

It's Palestine/Israel on steroids. Don't forget there's still a cry for peace in that region amongst Israelis. In my recent experience of Indian news, I have seen no such thing.
 
Should have grown a pair and snatched it in 62 when we had the chance.


It now seems that Kashmir may never be a part of Pakistan unless India implodes and disintegrates into several smaller countries.

Pretty much, even then we offered to make a joint defence union with India against China during their war (which the Indians rejected). India, since day one has never and has never will, accept Pakistan and they have been consistent with their policy. Had we had any balls we'd joined the war with China and could have done some real damage.
 
The occupying animals of India's government will be kicked out. Can't wait till that occurrs. Those who commit injustices will always end up on the wrong side of history.

It is great to see that u r finally talking sense...
 


"It's a problem that needs to be managed, which it has been doing for last 70 years."

This is the impact it's already having. You've called it a problem for over 70 years and that's before the 'terrorists' existed. You're probably an educated bloke and you can not rise above the hate to seek a meaningful peace in Kashmir, what chance does the average villager have?

God forbid it but this has every chance of leading to a Kashmiri ethnocide/genocide as tensions are continually rising. When a society becomes uber patriotic it becomes proud of being nasty, the repercussions have an impact within that society, Nazism being case in point.

It's Palestine/Israel on steroids. Don't forget there's still a cry for peace in that region amongst Israelis. In my recent experience of Indian news, I have seen no such thing.

You do realize that you've lost the argument the moment you brought Nazism into this? Google for Godwin's Law.

Problem with the standard Pakistani narrative on Kashmir is: it's so far removed from the reality that sometimes one has to wonder if they're even on the same planet.

Let's try and differentiate from the myth and reality.

Pak myth: India is about to break up. The center can not hold. Anarchy is about to descend.
Reality: India's never been stronger. It successfully overcame the Punjab problem (a unique outcome in the modern history). It has seen 70 years of rich democratic tradition (except for 18 months of emergency in 1975). Free and fair elections are conducted every 5 years followed by seamless transition of power irrespective of who wins. It has a professional army under 100% civilian control and has *never* gone out line (not even during the emergency in 1975). Local insurgencies like naxalism are beginning to come under control.

Myth: Extreme poverty will push India into chaos.
Reality: On a % terms, the poverty rate is at its lowest in the history of south Asia and going further down fast. Literacy rate is at its highest and climbing fast. Consumerism is growing and people are beginning to lead comfortable life. Extreme form of poverty still exists but there is a well-proven framework to resolve the issues in the coming years.

Myth: India is in the permanent state of ethno-religious strife.
Reality: Decade on decade, this has actually come down. On a per capita basis, the number of violent incidents or people affected in violent incidents is at its minimum. India is in fact the safest place for a Muslim to be in.

So where does Kashmir fit in all this? It doesn't. 99% of Indians do not care about what goes on in Kashmir. They're busy leading their day-to-day lives. Whenever something happens in Kashmir, media reports it for a day or two and then people move on. Why should 1.25 billion people care about what 50 lakh miserably stupid people choose to do with their lives? The smarter among them already moved somewhere else and are leading happy lives (some to Birmingham, UK I might add :) These 50 lakh people have a choice: they can either become part of the India growth story or they can cry, sulk, whine and throw stones on Army personnel. Frankly, no one cares, not even their minders in Pakistan, who are more interested in getting political mileage out of this than doing something meaningful about it.
 
You do realize that you've lost the argument the moment you brought Nazism into this? Google for Godwin's Law.

Problem with the standard Pakistani narrative on Kashmir is: it's so far removed from the reality that sometimes one has to wonder if they're even on the same planet.

Let's try and differentiate from the myth and reality.

Pak myth: India is about to break up. The center can not hold. Anarchy is about to descend.
Reality: India's never been stronger. It successfully overcame the Punjab problem (a unique outcome in the modern history). It has seen 70 years of rich democratic tradition (except for 18 months of emergency in 1975). Free and fair elections are conducted every 5 years followed by seamless transition of power irrespective of who wins. It has a professional army under 100% civilian control and has *never* gone out line (not even during the emergency in 1975). Local insurgencies like naxalism are beginning to come under control.

Myth: Extreme poverty will push India into chaos.
Reality: On a % terms, the poverty rate is at its lowest in the history of south Asia and going further down fast. Literacy rate is at its highest and climbing fast. Consumerism is growing and people are beginning to lead comfortable life. Extreme form of poverty still exists but there is a well-proven framework to resolve the issues in the coming years.

Myth: India is in the permanent state of ethno-religious strife.
Reality: Decade on decade, this has actually come down. On a per capita basis, the number of violent incidents or people affected in violent incidents is at its minimum. India is in fact the safest place for a Muslim to be in.

So where does Kashmir fit in all this? It doesn't. 99% of Indians do not care about what goes on in Kashmir. They're busy leading their day-to-day lives. Whenever something happens in Kashmir, media reports it for a day or two and then people move on. Why should 1.25 billion people care about what 50 lakh miserably stupid people choose to do with their lives? The smarter among them already moved somewhere else and are leading happy lives (some to Birmingham, UK I might add :) These 50 lakh people have a choice: they can either become part of the India growth story or they can cry, sulk, whine and throw stones on Army personnel. Frankly, no one cares, not even their minders in Pakistan, who are more interested in getting political mileage out of this than doing something meaningful about it.

The facts mentioned in this post are almost 70% right but only if it would have been 2007 but this is 2017 and situation is nothing like u hav mentioned......
71 years ago ALI MOHAMMAD JINNAH said: "MUSLIMS IN INDIA WILL HAVE TO PROVE THEIR LOYALTY EVERYDAY"....
And man indians hav worked so hard to prove that he was right.....
and it feels u dont watch news channels of india..... 99.99999999 is about Kashmir...
There is nothing on indian news channels except kashmir....
 


I have to admit I'm not up to date with the figures of either country, but I do know that India is economically slightly better off at the moment



Forgot to address this, so here goes.

India is slightly better off than Pak? Surely you're jesting?!

Here are some facts since you haven't bothered to keep up with the numbers. As per the latest CIA Factbook:

India: Real GDP is $2.25 trillion. PPP adjusted GDP is $8.7 trillion. Per capita: $6,700
Same numbers for Pakistan are $300B, $1 trillion and $5,100.

So on per capita basis, India is higher than Pak by 30%!

I don't know about you, but in my world 30% is not "slightly higher". Especially if you think about the fact that 25 years ago, Pak was ahead of India by 20-25%. So a straight 50% change in 25 years. Just project this to 25 years later, and you'll get the picture.

I know people like to believe in their own myths, but facts matter.
 


"It's a problem that needs to be managed, which it has been doing for last 70 years."

This is the impact it's already having. You've called it a problem for over 70 years and that's before the 'terrorists' existed. You're probably an educated bloke and you can not rise above the hate to seek a meaningful peace in Kashmir, what chance does the average villager have?

God forbid it but this has every chance of leading to a Kashmiri ethnocide/genocide as tensions are continually rising. When a society becomes uber patriotic it becomes proud of being nasty, the repercussions have an impact within that society, Nazism being case in point.

It's Palestine/Israel on steroids. Don't forget there's still a cry for peace in that region amongst Israelis. In my recent experience of Indian news, I have seen no such thing.

It is becoz u watch these MODIfied news channels.... watch some real debates and news....
aljazeera BBC VOA WION CNN or even that indian channel NDTV
 
Forgot to address this, so here goes.

India is slightly better off than Pak? Surely you're jesting?!

Here are some facts since you haven't bothered to keep up with the numbers. As per the latest CIA Factbook:

India: Real GDP is $2.25 trillion. PPP adjusted GDP is $8.7 trillion. Per capita: $6,700
Same numbers for Pakistan are $300B, $1 trillion and $5,100.

So on per capita basis, India is higher than Pak by 30%!

I don't know about you, but in my world 30% is not "slightly higher". Especially if you think about the fact that 25 years ago, Pak was ahead of India by 20-25%. So a straight 50% change in 25 years. Just project this to 25 years later, and you'll get the picture.

I know people like to believe in their own myths, but facts matter.

Per capita $6700 vs $5100 is 30%?
 
Forgot to address this, so here goes.

India is slightly better off than Pak? Surely you're jesting?!

Here are some facts since you haven't bothered to keep up with the numbers. As per the latest CIA Factbook:

India: Real GDP is $2.25 trillion. PPP adjusted GDP is $8.7 trillion. Per capita: $6,700
Same numbers for Pakistan are $300B, $1 trillion and $5,100.

So on per capita basis, India is higher than Pak by 30%!

I don't know about you, but in my world 30% is not "slightly higher". Especially if you think about the fact that 25 years ago, Pak was ahead of India by 20-25%. So a straight 50% change in 25 years. Just project this to 25 years later, and you'll get the picture.

I know people like to believe in their own myths, but facts matter.

Also, India's population is about ten times bigger than Pakistan. You reduce India's population to Pakistan's level and it'd be teetering like we are.
[MENTION=26195]DW44[/MENTION] called it correctly, India is Pakistan on steroids.
 
my view is, kashmir is being misused by both india and pakistan, kashmiris are being misused

pakistan couldnt present proper kashmir case at the UN or with diplomatic missions

pakistan has already lost kashmir case a long time back

now pakistan uses terrorism and backing terrorists and uses kashmiris to reignite kashmir issue when ever it suits pakistan's interests

india is also not demilitarising kashmir valley and it has its eyes on kashmir resources

kahsmiris are also foolish to support jihadi organisations

Pakistan has also not treated its own kashmiris (GB) well

for example CPEC is constructed from GB but no consensus was developed to make GB people allow CPEC through their lands

many GB human rights activists have been treated like animals
 
Pakistan also gave up many parts of kashmir to china, for example some parts of gilgit baltistan were handed over to china, aksai chin's which is controlled by china is also given up by pakistan, its india who keeps claiming this land

so my question is, does pakistan claim entire kashmir, or only muslim dominated kashmir vally

because rest of jammu kashmir is not even muslim, so does pakistan claim on this part really hold?
 
my view is, kashmir is being misused by both india and pakistan, kashmiris are being misused

pakistan couldnt present proper kashmir case at the UN or with diplomatic missions

pakistan has already lost kashmir case a long time back

now pakistan uses terrorism and backing terrorists and uses kashmiris to reignite kashmir issue when ever it suits pakistan's interests

india is also not demilitarising kashmir valley and it has its eyes on kashmir resources

kahsmiris are also foolish to support jihadi organisations

Pakistan has also not treated its own kashmiris (GB) well

for example CPEC is constructed from GB but no consensus was developed to make GB people allow CPEC through their lands

many GB human rights activists have been treated like animals

Every province barring Punjab has been neglected in CPEC.
 
Also, India's population is about ten times bigger than Pakistan. You reduce India's population to Pakistan's level and it'd be teetering like we are.
[MENTION=26195]DW44[/MENTION] called it correctly, India is Pakistan on steroids.

Are you being deliberately obtuse? The moment a number is reported as "per capita", the absolute value of population doesn't matter.
 
Are you being deliberately obtuse? The moment a number is reported as "per capita", the absolute value of population doesn't matter.

India has had peace, a good chain of governance and relatively no upheaval.

Pakistan has been wrecked with violence, it has had almost 60,000 dead in a decade of war, it has had numerous regime changes and political upheaval and even a localised civil war and its economy is a disaster and it has survived on IMF handouts. And yet here you are crowing about a 30% comparison with a nation that has barely hung on and I am the obtuse one. :91:

Why don't you compare it to China? Someone who is India's main economic rival? The difference there is about 100%. Compared to that I'd say Pakistan being only 30% behind with all the chaos and disaster is doing stellar
 
India has had peace, a good chain of governance and relatively no upheaval.

Pakistan has been wrecked with violence, it has had almost 60,000 dead in a decade of war, it has had numerous regime changes and political upheaval and even a localised civil war and its economy is a disaster and it has survived on IMF handouts. And yet here you are crowing about a 30% comparison with a nation that has barely hung on and I am the obtuse one. :91:

Why don't you compare it to China? Someone who is India's main economic rival? The difference there is about 100%. Compared to that I'd say Pakistan being only 30% behind with all the chaos and disaster is doing stellar

First you can't do basic math and now you're changing the goalposts!

I could compare it with the US and say that the difference is 900%. Except that the US is not involved in the Kashmir problem. I already mentioned several times in my responses in this thread that China is 20 years ahead of India. What's more to say?

Someone was saying that India is "slightly ahead" of Pak on economic terms. I was just correcting his myth.

And you probably don't realize it, but by telling me that Pak is wreaked by violence and extremism (which is all true), you're in fact supporting my point against this other poster! I was the one who was telling him that it's going to be really hard for Pak to turn things around in the foreseeable future. So, all I can say is "thank you!"
 
You do realize that you've lost the argument the moment you brought Nazism into this? Google for Godwin's Law.

Boy, have you been busy.

I thought we were having a discussion, but let's say for a moment this is an argument. You're saying I've lost because I've mentioned Nazism? I used it as an example of how society can become if extreme patriotism is left unchecked. With that in mind I don't need to google Godwin's Law, I know exactly what it is; but you don't. I've not mentioned Hitler nor have I compared anyone with him or Nazism. Again is deliberate or misunderstood? It's petty if deliberate.


Problem with the standard Pakistani narrative on Kashmir is: it's so far removed from the reality that sometimes one has to wonder if they're even on the same planet.


Let's try and differentiate from the myth and reality.

Pak myth: India is about to break up. The center can not hold. Anarchy is about to descend.
Reality: India's never been stronger. It successfully overcame the Punjab problem (a unique outcome in the modern history). It has seen 70 years of rich democratic tradition (except for 18 months of emergency in 1975). Free and fair elections are conducted every 5 years followed by seamless transition of power irrespective of who wins. It has a professional army under 100% civilian control and has *never* gone out line (not even during the emergency in 1975). Local insurgencies like naxalism are beginning to come under control.

I agree about India's democracy, which is why Pakistan need to rid themselves of the Sharif/Bhutto corruption. You've just pointed out why Pakistan needs change.

I don't believe India is about to break up any time soon, but one thing is inevitable with Kashmir, India will either grant independence or destroy its own moral standards. The latter is more dangerous than the former. The problem is worsening and Indian hostilities are on the rise and India's military response is disproportionate, very much like Israel's. Your attitude towards Kashmiris is a prime example. India needs to extend its hand to Kashmir because it has far more to lose.

Myth: Extreme poverty will push India into chaos.
Reality: On a % terms, the poverty rate is at its lowest in the history of south Asia and going further down fast. Literacy rate is at its highest and climbing fast. Consumerism is growing and people are beginning to lead comfortable life. Extreme form of poverty still exists but there is a well-proven framework to resolve the issues in the coming years.

It won't descend into chaos because we've know what the Indian army is capable of against its own citizens. I only need to post this article to show you how figures can be manipulated: https://qz.com/1013004/the-five-hal...ndians-remain-poor/?utm_source=YPL&yptr=yahoo


Myth: India is in the permanent state of ethno-religious strife.
Reality: Decade on decade, this has actually come down. On a per capita basis, the number of violent incidents or people affected in violent incidents is at its minimum. India is in fact the safest place for a Muslim to be in.

I'm sorry but I have to laugh at this. Ask Kashmiri Muslims about how safe they feel or those Muslims persecuted for selling beef or even those who have supported the Pakistani cricket team. Some of this news has been posted by Indian users on this forum

So where does Kashmir fit in all this? It doesn't. 99% of Indians do not care about what goes on in Kashmir. They're busy leading their day-to-day lives. Whenever something happens in Kashmir, media reports it for a day or two and then people move on. Why should 1.25 billion people care about what 50 lakh miserably stupid people choose to do with their lives? The smarter among them already moved somewhere else and are leading happy lives (some to Birmingham, UK I might add :) These 50 lakh people have a choice: they can either become part of the India growth story or they can cry, sulk, whine and throw stones on Army personnel. Frankly, no one cares, not even their minders in Pakistan, who are more interested in getting political mileage out of this than doing something meaningful about it.

As mentioned previously, you're expected to know more than to generalise, because you'd probably be considered liberal for posting on a Pakistani cricket forum, I can't imagine how bad the conservatives must feel towards Kashmiris if you've generalised them as "miserably stupid people".

Yet you expect them to 'become part of the India growth story'. Can you not see the glaring disparity between your ideals and your attitude? It's not consistent and reeks of insincerity.
 
Last edited:
First you can't do basic math and now you're changing the goalposts!

I could compare it with the US and say that the difference is 900%. Except that the US is not involved in the Kashmir problem. I already mentioned several times in my responses in this thread that China is 20 years ahead of India. What's more to say?

Someone was saying that India is "slightly ahead" of Pak on economic terms. I was just correcting his myth.

And you probably don't realize it, but by telling me that Pak is wreaked by violence and extremism (which is all true), you're in fact supporting my point against this other poster! I was the one who was telling him that it's going to be really hard for Pak to turn things around in the foreseeable future. So, all I can say is "thank you!"

It will be hard for Pakistan however with no more dictatorships it will be more stable and can rebound quicker.

While India is ahead by Pakistan when it comes to GDP it has not really translated into much. HDI, GNI etc India and Pakistan are pretty much level and on those metrics both nations are surrounded by African countries when it comes to rankings and such, its all good mentioning GDP and this and that but the average joe isn't really better off. Though I do get your point re: your third and fourth paragraph.
 
Forgot to address this, so here goes.

India is slightly better off than Pak? Surely you're jesting?!

Here are some facts since you haven't bothered to keep up with the numbers. As per the latest CIA Factbook:

India: Real GDP is $2.25 trillion. PPP adjusted GDP is $8.7 trillion. Per capita: $6,700
Same numbers for Pakistan are $300B, $1 trillion and $5,100.

So on per capita basis, India is higher than Pak by 30%!

I don't know about you, but in my world 30% is not "slightly higher". Especially if you think about the fact that 25 years ago, Pak was ahead of India by 20-25%. So a straight 50% change in 25 years. Just project this to 25 years later, and you'll get the picture.

I know people like to believe in their own myths, but facts matter.

Let's be honest 30% is nothing compared to what it should be due to the instability in Pakistani politics. India has been a functioning democracy as you have already mentioned, Pakistan hasn't. These figures also don't show India's level of poverty, I think I read in the Time's magazine a while back thhat it had the highest number of poor people anywhere in the world. So let's keep it all in perspective. Yes, slightly better all things considered.
 
It is becoz u watch these MODIfied news channels.... watch some real debates and news....
aljazeera BBC VOA WION CNN or even that indian channel NDTV

So now you think you know which channels I watch too? You've turned this into a really petty argument but here's some articles from one of the 'reputable' sources you've mentioned and one not on your list:

http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/op...ass-conversion-problem-20151274531627294.html

https://news.vice.com/article/chris...more-persecution-by-hindu-extremists-in-india

Also forgot to mention India might be economically better off but the Kasmir issue shows that it's morally bankrupt as for reasons mentioned above.
 
Last edited:
As mentioned previously, you're expected to know more than to generalise, because you'd probably be considered liberal for posting on a Pakistani cricket forum, I can't imagine how bad the conservatives must feel towards Kashmiris if you've generalised them as "miserably stupid people".

Yet you expect them to 'become part of the India growth story'. Can you not see the glaring disparity between your ideals and your attitude? It's not consistent and reeks of insincerity.

I don't see any inconsistency at all. Life is all about making choices and the choices you make shapes your destiny. There are kids in India who choose to study 16 hours a day (some of them without proper lighting in their house), get into IITs / IIMs, become successful professionals and lead a prosperous life (just to mention one example, there 100s of ways to do this). Then there are kids who choose to pelt stones at security personnel. Guess who has a higher chance of succeeding in life? India is a nation of 125 crore people, not 50 lakh Kashmiris. These 50L Kashmiris need to try and integrate themselves into Indian mainstream, not the other way round. They are not special, India owes them nothing. A poor kid growing up in Orissa is as special as a kid in Kashmir. When the Orissa kid doesn't get any special breaks in life, why should the Kashmiri?

In life you have to earn everything you get. You are not entitled to any special privileges.

Why is this so hard to understand?
 
Let's be honest 30% is nothing compared to what it should be due to the instability in Pakistani politics. India has been a functioning democracy as you have already mentioned, Pakistan hasn't. These figures also don't show India's level of poverty, I think I read in the Time's magazine a while back thhat it had the highest number of poor people anywhere in the world. So let's keep it all in perspective. Yes, slightly better all things considered.

I'll not keep arguing the same point. You refuse to get it. I never said India didn't have poverty (see all my posts earlier). All I said was we also have a well proven framework to address poverty which has delivered extraordinarily well over the last 20 years. Which means there is every chance of it working again over next 20 years. You said you didn't have the numbers handy. I provided them to you. The difference today is 30%. It was -20% 20 years ago. So it's a change of 50% in 20 years. I'll let you decide where this trajectory takes us over the next 20-25 years.
 
Never in history have an oppresssed people remain oppressed. India won't always have Hindu extremists in power.

There will come a day when India will themselves allow Kashmir to be free.

Your logic is flawed as India was ruled by 'Secular' Congress for around 60 years yet there has been no change in India's stance on Kashmir over these years.
If there's one issue that unites parties all over India on a consensus , it's the Kashmir one.There will be a civil war in this country if any party in the power decided to give away Kashmir.Over the years this region has been seen as izzat of India and the public would go absolute bonkers if there is any attempt to change the status quo.
India will never let Kashmir go.We can have this debate on pp over and over but it won't change a thing.
 
Your logic is flawed as India was ruled by 'Secular' Congress for around 60 years yet there has been no change in India's stance on Kashmir over these years.
If there's one issue that unites parties all over India on a consensus , it's the Kashmir one.There will be a civil war in this country if any party in the power decided to give away Kashmir.Over the years this region has been seen as izzat of India and the public would go absolute bonkers if there is any attempt to change the status quo.
India will never let Kashmir go.We can have this debate on pp over and over but it won't change a thing.

As an India I can assure you that India will never let Kashmir go unless there is a collapse in the center, as happened in Indonesia (Timor), Sudan (South Sudan), Yugoslavia (Croatia and Bosnia) etc.

The Indian Central Government shows no signs of collapsing for at least the next 100 years.

Many Kashmiri muslims make a decent living selling stuff in the rest of the country. My mother had a favorite Kashmiri shawl-wala from whom she would buy shawls at twice to thrice the market price.

If cooler heads prevailed, Kashmiris would realize that they can be as affluent as the Goanese, that is their incomes would quadruple. The tourism potential of Kashmir is no less than that of Goa.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Indian_states_and_union_territories_by_GDP_per_capita

Instead of becoming 4 times as wealthy, Kashmiris continue their futile revolt which shows absolutely zero chance of succeeding. If anything India has got much stronger over the past 3 decades after economic liberalization.

TM is right, the Kashmir issue unites all Indians. No national party is going to even conceive of letting Kashmir go. All the killing of a few soldiers and policemen every year does is to make Indians even firmer in their resolve that their lives were not lost in vain.

I just don't get it. Kashmiris have the option of being the most affluent Indians, they have the resources. They can be four to five times as rich as they are now. Instead they kill Pandits and drive them out of the state, and Pandits are the intellectual elites who can contribute massively to the welfare of the state. And they wage this constant futile war against India which destroys their economy.

Kashmiris actually have more rights than the common Indian thanks to Article 370. Whereas they can buy property in the rest of India, other Indians cannot buy property in Kashmir.

All the Kashmiri revolt does is to give importance to some some terrorist leaders who would have been non-entities otherwise. The common Kashmiri people are biggest losers from the revolt.
 
Last edited:
As an India I can assure you that India will never let Kashmir go unless there is a collapse in the center, as happened in Indonesia (Timor), Sudan (South Sudan), Yugoslavia (Croatia and Bosnia) etc.

The Indian Central Government shows no signs of collapsing for at least the next 100 years.

Many Kashmiri muslims make a decent living selling stuff in the rest of the country. My mother had a favorite Kashmiri shawl-wala from whom she would buy shawls at twice to thrice the market price.

If cooler heads prevailed, Kashmiris would realize that they can be as affluent as the Goanese, that is their incomes would quadruple. The tourism potential of Kashmir is no less than that of Goa.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Indian_states_and_union_territories_by_GDP_per_capita

Instead of becoming 4 times as wealthy, Kashmiris continue their futile revolt which shows absolutely zero chance of succeeding. If anything India has got much stronger over the past 3 decades after economic liberalization.

TM is right, the Kashmir issue unites all Indians. No national party is going to even conceive of letting Kashmir go. All the killing of a few soldiers and policemen every year does is to make Indians even firmer in their resolve that their lives were not lost in vain.

I just don't get it. Kashmiris have the option of being the most affluent Indians, they have the resources. They can be four to five times as rich as they are now. Instead they kill Pandits and drive them out of the state, and Pandits are the intellectual elites who can contribute massively to the welfare of the state. And they wage this constant futile war against India which destroys their economy.

Kashmiris actually have more rights than the common Indian thanks to Article 370. Whereas they can buy property in the rest of India, other Indians cannot buy property in Kashmir.

All the Kashmiri revolt does is to give importance to some some terrorist leaders who would have been non-entities otherwise. The common Kashmiri people are biggest losers from the revolt.
India could easily have gone the Israeli way and started populating the valley with the people from rest of the country and you could have seen Kashmiris getting outnumbered in their own backyard yet they did not and instead an average Kashmiri like you said enjoy some extra privileges compared to the people from rest of the India.
Yet instead of working and striving to make their state progressive they chose to go the other way inciting hatred and even brainwashing school going children :facepalm:.
Yes India had been at fault esp while dealing with local populace and adapting not enough measures to garner support from common man from the valley but the Kashmiris haven't been innocent either.No one is fool enough to not realize that the only motivation to join Pakistan is RELIGION.Period.I mean why else would you want to join a nation dealing with major internal problems of its own having enough crap on its plate already.
I sincerely hope one day they would come to their senses and we would see the peace prevail in the valley like it used to be the case before late 80s.
 
I don't see any inconsistency at all. Life is all about making choices and the choices you make shapes your destiny.


Let's make this simple. Your views on this thread about Kashmiris have been quite condescending, contempuous, derogoratory and outright insulting. Scroll back up to see the generalistions you've made. You can't insult someone and then expect them to trust you in providing them fair and equal opportunity.

If you read my first post on this thread, I mentioned exactly this, that India needs do as much as it can to de-escalate the situation, instead as Indian posters have demonstrated on this forum, they are doing the complete opposite.

Speaking of choices, India made a choice to want Kashmir but Kasmiris as a whole never made that choice from the outset.



There are kids in India who choose to study 16 hours a day (some of them without proper lighting in their house), get into IITs / IIMs, become successful professionals and lead a prosperous life (just to mention one example, there 100s of ways to do this). Then there are kids who choose to pelt stones at security personnel. Guess who has a higher chance of succeeding in life?


Again you've displayed your contempt towards Kashmiris insinutating they don't work as hard or are not willing to. They have an existential threat, comparing that with an Indian citizen elsewhere is ridiculous.


India is a nation of 125 crore people, not 50 lakh Kashmiris. These 50L Kashmiris need to try and integrate themselves into Indian mainstream, not the other way round.

They are not special, India owes them nothing. A poor kid growing up in Orissa is as special as a kid in Kashmir. When the Orissa kid doesn't get any special breaks in life, why should the Kashmiri?

Refer to the above, India did everything they could to have this part of Kashmir to accede to India, they owe the Kashmiris for taking control of their land and destiny(your choice word. India hasn't sacrificed or worked as hard to keep hold of any other territory, to put that much effort in and then say you owe them nothing is consistent with your disregard for Kashmir, the only consistent aspect in your argument.

In life you have to earn everything you get. You are not entitled to any special privileges.

Agreed

Why is this so hard to understand?

It's not
 
I'll not keep arguing the same point. You refuse to get it. I never said India didn't have poverty (see all my posts earlier). All I said was we also have a well proven framework to address poverty which has delivered extraordinarily well over the last 20 years. Which means there is every chance of it working again over next 20 years. You said you didn't have the numbers handy. I provided them to you. The difference today is 30%. It was -20% 20 years ago. So it's a change of 50% in 20 years. I'll let you decide where this trajectory takes us over the next 20-25 years.


I have got it. You're saying India has outdone Pakistan economically, and you've used figures to achieve your purpose. Even if the level of poverty is reduced, hunger remains the No.1 cause of death in India today. Aids, Cancer etc. follow.

To use an analogy, what' you've done is to say my family is doing great because two of your children are rich and healthy whilst the third is poor and malnourished. You seem to conveniently forget about this third child. That's why I said "all things considered India is only slightly better off" than Pakistan. I haven't delved into the India vs Pakistan debate because for one I have no interest in defending or propagating for either country and two, it's derailing the thread.
 
It will be hard for Pakistan however with no more dictatorships it will be more stable and can rebound quicker.

Let me put it bluntly, even though as I am an Indian you may not think of me as a well-wisher.

The talent level of Indians and Pakistanis is not very different as Pakistanis are ethnically very similar to Indians (especially northwest Indians).

However, these are inescapable facts:

1) Unless you get the Army out of your economy, you will never have modern industries. You may have textiles and tourism (much like Egypt has) but you will not have world class auto, pharma, software etc. Firms run by the Army do not have the creativity and market discipline to compete at the world level. The Army however loves its firms as it gives its senior officers a comfortable posting where they can be the boss.

2) Unless you get religion out of the public sphere you will not get the Army out of your economy. The Army uses religion and is associated enmity with India as the justification of its power.

From the above two facts you can deduce the way forward. However, I doubt that this realization will ever happen.
 
Last edited:
India could easily have gone the Israeli way and started populating the valley with the people from rest of the country and you could have seen Kashmiris getting outnumbered in their own backyard yet they did not and instead an average Kashmiri like you said enjoy some extra privileges compared to the people from rest of the India.
Yet instead of working and striving to make their state progressive they chose to go the other way inciting hatred and even brainwashing school going children :facepalm:.
Yes India had been at fault esp while dealing with local populace and adapting not enough measures to garner support from common man from the valley but the Kashmiris haven't been innocent either.No one is fool enough to not realize that the only motivation to join Pakistan is RELIGION.Period.I mean why else would you want to join a nation dealing with major internal problems of its own having enough crap on its plate already.
I sincerely hope one day they would come to their senses and we would see the peace prevail in the valley like it used to be the case before late 80s.

Disagree with some points but encouraging to see. Thanks.
 
Let me put it bluntly, even though as I am an Indian you may not think of me as a well-wisher.

The talent level of Indians and Pakistanis is not very different as Pakistanis are ethnically very similar to Indians (especially northwest Indians).

However, these are inescapable facts:

1) Unless you get the Army out of your economy, you will never have modern industries. You may have textiles and tourism (much like Egypt has) but you will not have world class auto, pharma, software etc. Firms run by the Army do not have the creativity and market discipline to compete at the world level. The Army however loves its firms as it gives its senior officers a comfortable posting where they can be the boss.

2) Unless you get religion out of the public sphere you will not get the Army out of your economy. The Army uses religion and is associated enmity with India as the justification of its power.

From the above two facts you can deduce the way forward. However, I doubt that this realization will ever happen.

Pretty much true. However there are also reasons for what you say:

a) Army runs a lot of things, that's a fact. Cushy jobs, cushy retirement pensions, unbelievable housing, good private sector jobs etc and worse they are not accountable for where all the $$$$$ comes from or goes. But that is also helped by the civilians' incompetence. Policing is one example, I am sure you have followed the carnage in Pakistan for the past decade. Out of the ruins of the peace we have now you'd expect a major improvement in our Police and SWAT-style elite services, yet all that money that is meant to be spent on security is eaten away by the civies, the billions of Rupees from our budget that is actually announced every year....is just eaten away. That not only invites the Army in but also solidifies their status in the average joe's eyes. You tell me, isn't it incompetent that every terror attack we have to wait and twiddle our thumbs till the SSG arrive? Where is the Police? Why are they not trained properly? Where is their budget spent on? Result? Army can step in comfortably and claim all the plaudits and the government can happily eat away knowing ''well they're going to save the day anyway''. Tomorrow if an attack happens we STILL don't have any Police who can step up and deal with it.

b) Same with schooling, we have a lot of Army run schools because the education budget somehow everywhere either does not get spent or goes into the fat pockets of the civilians'. Army then, once again, has a chance to swoop in and claim to be champions. Same for any natural disaster, I mean forget the Army its pathetic that the biggest ambulance service in Pakistan is run by Edhis, one might ask that the billions allocated to the health services by our politicians, well where are they going? Result? Every natural disaster you will still see the armed forces stepping in and leading the efforts, further entrenching themselves.

c) I know Indians trolls with their love for Nawaz Sharif, but you (an Indian) for once who's serious, should see why we are so frustrated. The status quo right now is: corrupt judiciary is propped by our civilians, who are propped up by the establishment. Its a merry go round. The Army having massive power still does not excuse the politicians eating away at the billions they get to spend every budget. Nobody is stopping our ministries in spending money on health care or education. The Army does not forbid the government in spending money on the people and the infrastructure of the nation. Nawaz Sharif will govern and eat away happily, if he steps out of line he's slapped back in by the Army but he or any politician has no interest in stepping out of line. They can sit there, eat away and the Army can exercise massive control. Everyone's a winner except the normal people.

d) Army is not the only one who uses religion, every party maybe barring PPP does. PMLN is famously allied to a lot of banned ****, you'll see a lot militants from banned organisations at their rallies. 8 years ago the Sharifs openly and proudly were stating that the Taliban and our ''aims are the same''. The biggest insult they use against Imran Khan for instance is that he's a Jewish agent, you say that in Pakistan and it'll get you votes. Even in the corruption scandal now his son was stating this is a Jewish conspiracy hatched by Khan from ''outside'', I mean what can you say to this nonsense?Even the recent operations against the terrorist organisations were ordered by the Army and the civilians had to be forced to go along with it, irony is that it was the Army who had propped these organisations up but that's another topic. Any Christian gets burned or killed and you won't see Nawaz making a statement till after a few days when everything is calm and he doesn't get criticised. Parinchar, the Shia dominated region, it took him days to react. That was not an accident. Ironically Musharraf for all his faults was the only secular minded leader we had, during his tenure there were even rumors of negotiations with the Israelis. However separating religion from the state is a pipe dream and sadly won't happen in my lifetime.

Thanks for being the only Indian who's posted something non-trolling about the politics in Pakistan. I hope my reply makes sense, maybe you can see why so many are not confident in where our country is going or will go regardless of the peace now.
 
Goodness!the level of brainwashing,misinformation and clueless-ness that even well educated indians exhibit makes one wonder what the kashmir fantasies of less educated ones that consist the bulk of indian populace.hardly one finds any example im history except may be nazi Germany where the genocide of an unnarmed population can have acquiescence amongst general public,civil society,media and the political class cutting across party lines and ideologies.
 
Goodness!the level of brainwashing,misinformation and clueless-ness that even well educated indians exhibit makes one wonder what the kashmir fantasies of less educated ones that consist the bulk of indian populace.hardly one finds any example im history except may be nazi Germany where the genocide of an unnarmed population can have acquiescence amongst general public,civil society,media and the political class cutting across party lines and ideologies.

It is. That's my point, India is doomed in the long run because that behaviour comes to bite you back in the ****. I think karma is an Indian concept, is it not?
 
It is. That's my point, India is doomed in the long run because that behaviour comes to bite you back in the ****. I think karma is an Indian concept, is it not?

It's an interesting echo chamber some of you Pakistanis live in. Folks who know nothing about India (or Kashmir) are wholeheartedly agreeing with each other that "India is doomed in the long run." :)

Ironically it's happening on the same day India rolled out the most ambitious program on the planet to modernize tax system and create the world's largest common market. Surely a first step towards being doomed, would you agree?!
 
Your logic is flawed as India was ruled by 'Secular' Congress for around 60 years yet there has been no change in India's stance on Kashmir over these years.
If there's one issue that unites parties all over India on a consensus , it's the Kashmir one.There will be a civil war in this country if any party in the power decided to give away Kashmir.Over the years this region has been seen as izzat of India and the public would go absolute bonkers if there is any attempt to change the status quo.
India will never let Kashmir go.We can have this debate on pp over and over but it won't change a thing.

60 years isn't much the greater scheme of things. The Crusaders held Jerusalem for a lot longer but as the people wanted them gone, eventually they did go. Do you really believe it will be the same situation in another 100 years?
 
Goodness!the level of brainwashing,misinformation and clueless-ness that even well educated indians exhibit makes one wonder what the kashmir fantasies of less educated ones that consist the bulk of indian populace.hardly one finds any example im history except may be nazi Germany where the genocide of an unnarmed population can have acquiescence amongst general public,civil society,media and the political class cutting across party lines and ideologies.

I suggest you read Islamic conquests of the subcontinent. If you don't want to go that far back read about the ethnic cleansing of Kashmiri Pandits from the valley less than 30 yrs ago. What goes around usually comes back around. Thats the sad reality regardless of who is involved.
 
It's an interesting echo chamber some of you Pakistanis live in. Folks who know nothing about India (or Kashmir) are wholeheartedly agreeing with each other that "India is doomed in the long run." :)

Ironically it's happening on the same day India rolled out the most ambitious program on the planet to modernize tax system and create the world's largest common market. Surely a first step towards being doomed, would you agree?!

Yet again you refer to economy as it's some magical wand that will bring world peace. No amount of money will solve the Kashmir issue unless India changes it stance. Now unlike you I don't mind how that peace comes, if India can bring peace and prosperity to Kashmir then so be it. I personally think unless Pakistan changes its leadership soon then Pakistan will no longer be a viable option for Kashmir, it'll be independence or India. This is why I think Modi prefers Nawaz Sharif.
 
There was no ethnic cleansing if you refer to all sources of information. I think an Indian poster posted an Al Jazeera artlcle trying to prove exactly what you stated but it actually showed that while an exodus did occur no proof of ethnic cleansing exists.

Even now you see Kashmiris wanting Pandits to return as Kashmiri brothers. Their exodus arose out of a mistrust that Pandits were informers for India back in the 60s and 70s
 
Yet again you refer to economy as it's some magical wand that will bring world peace. No amount of money will solve the Kashmir issue unless India changes it stance. Now unlike you I don't mind how that peace comes, if India can bring peace and prosperity to Kashmir then so be it. I personally think unless Pakistan changes its leadership soon then Pakistan will no longer be a viable option for Kashmir, it'll be independence or India. This is why I think Modi prefers Nawaz Sharif.

And once again you're displaying your ignorance on what's happening on the ground. Modi tried to get along with Sharif (invited him to his swearing in ceremony, made a surprise visit during a wedding in Sharif's family) hoping that Sharif can get something done. He soon realized that Sharif is a nobody. He can't even buy a kurta pyjama for himself without you-know-who's permission.

Pakistan is definitely a viable option for Kashmiris (Sharif in power or otherwise). I have said multiple times that those who prefer Pak can go live there. That's exactly what happened in 1947 -- people moved wherever they felt more comfortable in. Nobody's stopping them. Indian security personnel only care about terrorists coming into India, they don't care about terrorists and stone-pelters leaving! I have said multiple times that you've got to separate the people problem from the land problem. Land problem will take forever to solve. People problem can be solved in short order. Why waste your lives throwing stones when you can move to the land of milk and honey and where you'd be welcomed with open arms and where you can support the cricket team of your choice?
 
There was no ethnic cleansing if you refer to all sources of information. I think an Indian poster posted an Al Jazeera artlcle trying to prove exactly what you stated but it actually showed that while an exodus did occur no proof of ethnic cleansing exists.

Even now you see Kashmiris wanting Pandits to return as Kashmiri brothers. Their exodus arose out of a mistrust that Pandits were informers for India back in the 60s and 70s

There isnt a single Kashmiri Pandit that I personally met ( and I have met plenty of them) who has nice things to say about their state when they lived in the valley.
 
There isnt a single Kashmiri Pandit that I personally met ( and I have met plenty of them) who has nice things to say about their state when they lived in the valley.

Maybe so, but that doesn't prove ethnic cleansing.
 
Maybe so, but that doesn't prove ethnic cleansing.

Really ? So you think All Pandits evacuated mysteriously on their own? Which world do you live in bhai !! Forget Kashmir ... there is not a single region in the world where non-muslims as minorities live in peace dignity and equal rights with Muslims. Atleast Iam not aware of such a thing maybe you do.
 
And once again you're displaying your ignorance on what's happening on the ground. Modi tried to get along with Sharif (invited him to his swearing in ceremony, made a surprise visit during a wedding in Sharif's family) hoping that Sharif can get something done. He soon realized that Sharif is a nobody. He can't even buy a kurta pyjama for himself without you-know-who's permission.

Ignorance about what exactly? What's happening on the ground that you think I don't know about? We've already ascertained that your approach to this discussion has been antagonising whereas I've tried to main a more conciliatory tone. It just reaffirms my belief about where India is heading with regards to Kashmir. Yes, Modi prefers Sharif, because the latter is as incompetent as they come. The army/intelligence almost always has a role to play in foreign policy, especially a nation they've been at war with, don't see what's so surprising there.


Pakistan is definitely a viable option for Kashmiris (Sharif in power or otherwise). I have said multiple times that those who prefer Pak can go live there. That's exactly what happened in 1947 -- people moved wherever they felt more comfortable in. Nobody's stopping them. Indian security personnel only care about terrorists coming into India, they don't care about terrorists and stone-pelters leaving! I have said multiple times that you've got to separate the people problem from the land problem. Land problem will take forever to solve. People problem can be solved in short order. Why waste your lives throwing stones when you can move to the land of milk and honey and where you'd be welcomed with open arms and where you can support the cricket team of your choice?

This is where our conversation on this topic ends. If you can't differentiate the migration during 1947 and the Kashmir dispute, then you're exactly what you accuse me of, ignorant.
 
Really ? So you think All Pandits evacuated mysteriously on their own? Which world do you live in bhai !! Forget Kashmir ... there is not a single region in the world where non-muslims as minorities live in peace dignity and equal rights with Muslims. Atleast Iam not aware of such a thing maybe you do.

i live in the world where I can see things beyond nationalism and patriotism. Pandits were forced out and yes some were probably killed in the conflict that ensued. Why they were forced is a matter we only hear about from one side, India's. It would obviously be biased, Like I said, listen to the Kashmiri account and it's completely different. I'm encouraged by your concern about ethnocide, because India will need people like you when it's about to commit the same against Kashmir. That's been my point in this thread. India cannot continue like this against Kashmir, it has far more to lose.
 
Back
Top