Rana
Hall of Famer
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2006
- Runs
- 85,695
Could be a great 'Bajrangi Bhaijan' type movie angle in Bollywood for the second pilot. Really is a mystery what happened to him, the conspiracy theories are endless!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Could be a great 'Bajrangi Bhaijan' type movie angle in Bollywood for the second pilot. Really is a mystery what happened to him, the conspiracy theories are endless!
Based on several versions, it's an Indian pilot, it's a Pakistani pilot or it's an Israeli pilot. Bunch of bull****. At the end of the day, everybody disowned that poor guy whoever he was. Fallen plane or pilot is not a matter of national pride. Americans even made a movie out of it in black hawk down that was downed by a bunch of Somali rag pickers. Anything that's in the air is vulnerable to attacks from the ground. People should man up and honor that man.
There were reports that the Budgam crash was also done by Pakistani jets and they were at a distance of only 7 km from Srinagar Airport when they turned back. Pakistan obviously cannot claim this kill due to diplomatic reasons because this will be considered a masive airspace violation to come in so much.
you could go with...there's no pilot.
Only one side has been caught lying consistently in the fiasco.
- we were in pakistani airspace for 21 minutes (day 1) and shot up a camp and killed 300
- you are anti-armed forces for questioning it (day 1 to now)
- we actually shot what we wanted, and premature to talk numbers (day 2)
- actually we have 2000lb bombs that dont destroy structures but kill everything inside them (day3)
- er...one more thing, we didnt really go inside pakistan airspace, we shot them from our side of the border with spice missiles (day 4)
- i forgot to add on day 3 modiji: "if i had the planes (that my govt was bribed for) the result would have been different.
- oh, our capture pilot shot up the plane...
- lots of stories about pakistani's supposedly lying their own pilot
Contrast that with our folks
- we made a claim we shot planes and potentially have two pilots
- we took back the claim the same day.
one side has been lying for a week now while the other made an error and admitted the same day.
So i understand you want to blv this fantasy because it helps you sleep better because you think some score was settled - one Paksitani plane and one Indian plane. Except nothing like that happened because there is zero (yes zero proof of it)
Oh my god! Really?
Thats what i heard. And lets be honest, what are the odds that it fell all by itself on the same day when PAF came inside the Indian controlled territory?
Yes there is zero proof except for India encroaching Pak airspace and bombed something , 1 Indian jet crashed by PAF and 1 POW. Rest of it is hogwash. The F16 story by India, the 2nd pilot statement by Imran of all people, the 300 terrorists killed, the SU 30 crashed are all speculations with stories changed by the day. It's just a couple of third world countries trying for one-upmanship. The way I see it, Pakistan should have shot down at least one Indian jet when they entered the first night. Because of inefficiency, they couldnt. India should have expected Pakistan to retaliate and should have been ready the next day. Instead they lost a jet and a pilot. Basically, it's two nincompoop Airforces that can't get their basics right of defending themselves in case of an air incursion. At the end of the day when the bragging rights were in question, they all concocted stories, more on the Indian side and slept peacefully at night patting themselves on the back.
The larger agenda here (beyond of course Pakistan addressing the stuff at its end) is that arms deal ride on these narratives. Of course Pakistan would like to claim it use on the Jf17. Of course US would like to say an F16 was involved. And of course India/Russia/France would like to claim that one of their planes was either part of the Balakot raid or the defense from Pakistan intrusion.
But, because there are some long and short term interests at play for all these countries, none of them want to confirm or deny more than whats obvious
Or the Russian was the 'Driving Instructor' for the Indian pilots.Not a Indian, Pakistani or Israeli pilot. He was actually a Russian pilot who was demonstrating the capabilities of the jet and now he is lost.
What about this one. In the actual un-censored Video, the voices sound very Kashmiri.A video of this man was circulating on social media at the time but I think he is someone who escaped an internal plane crash a few weeks before the skirmishes between the two countries. This is an unrelated incident.
https://youtu.be/t0-WHlDyhV0
Watch this video at one minute in, he says the second pilot died.
Now that the DGISPR has said on record that the second pilot died, it is even more mysterious why they are not releasing more information about him. It could be said that India may have some incentive to cover it up but why would Pakistan cover it up?
It's obvious, they don't want to raise tensions further.
What about this one. In the actual un-censored Video, the voices sound very Kashmiri.
View attachment 89111
https://youtu.be/t0-WHlDyhV0
Watch this video at one minute in, he says the second pilot died.
Now that the DGISPR has said on record that the second pilot died, it is even more mysterious why they are not releasing more information about him. It could be said that India may have some incentive to cover it up but why would Pakistan cover it up?
Best explanation is that he wasn't Indian. Have heard this version multiple times.
Or he is/was double agent ?
So you are accepting that Pakistan's fighter jet was downed by India and the Pakistani pilot had to eject only to be caught by locals and beaten to death?
Also, doesnt Pakistan air force uniform have a Pakistani flag on the arm? How can people mistake him for an Indian? And locals didnt talk to the pilot before killing him? How did locals even know that Indian airforce was coming and that there was a possibility of Indian pilot being on their land? First look at any soldier will clearly make the locals think that he must be a Pakistani soldier. The Indian story doesnt make sense.
What makes more sense is that either the second Indian pilot is still in Pakistan's custody or he died and this news was brushed under the carpet to de-escalate the situation. Remember India first said they didnt even lose 1 pilot. Only after Abhinandan's video was released did they accept that 1 was missing. Pakistan didnt release the video of another fighter and hence India didnt claim that they had lost another one.
It's obvious, they don't want to raise tensions further.
The larger agenda here (beyond of course Pakistan addressing the stuff at its end) is that arms deal ride on these narratives. Of course Pakistan would like to claim it use on the Jf17. Of course US would like to say an F16 was involved. And of course India/Russia/France would like to claim that one of their planes was either part of the Balakot raid or the defense from Pakistan intrusion.
But, because there are some long and short term interests at play for all these countries, none of them want to confirm or deny more than whats obvious
Yeah, its obvious. You believe what you believe. If you pretend that one pov is obvious and the other one is not, you are simply being biased, naive or hypocritical or all of it.
AMRAAM fired from JF-17 is absurd. Why would Raytheon make a missile & share its codes with the Chinese govt to enable its missile from a Chinese plane. I dont know why the Pak govt is peddling this theory.
Pak's defense is to simply ack that it employed F-16 in self-defense. Why would US "like" Pak to use F-16? They either dont care if Pak used it per the spirit of the agreement or they are not sure that Pak violated the agreement.Either ways, there is no reason US would have liked Pak to use F-16
Conspiracy theory going around that second pilot is an Israeli.
A name is also coming out ( of the Israeli pilot) and it is being said that he hasnt updated his twitter since 26th feb. I have not looked into this personally so i cant really comment even though i wont push it aside as rubbish.
Conspiracy theory going around that second pilot is an Israeli.
A name is also coming out ( of the Israeli pilot) and it is being said that he hasnt updated his twitter since 26th feb. I have not looked into this personally so i cant really comment even though i wont push it aside as rubbish.
Conspiracy theory going around that second pilot is an Israeli.
A name is also coming out ( of the Israeli pilot) and it is being said that he hasnt updated his twitter since 26th feb. I have not looked into this personally so i cant really comment even though i wont push it aside as rubbish.
Can happen. Maybe Israelis wanted revenge for 1974![]()
This is the original article
https://www.jpost.com/National-News/Family-bids-farewell-to-pilot-who-died-in-IAF-crash
and looking at the english used you can tell that a modified image is making the rounds on whatsapp
![]()
I heard that the second pilot is in custody of Pakistan.
I heard that the second pilot is in custody of Pakistan.
Source? Not heard it from anywhere
I highly doubt it unless we will release the information soon to damage Modi's election chances. Which would be a masterstroke
Why would want to ruin Modi's chances? Modi's election is exactly what Pakistan should want. And i am sure thats what your agencies are working for.
Not really. Modi wants war. Our economy is on its knees as it is. We barely have any dollars in reserves. We can't afford a war, we would be out of cash very soon.
Modi doesnt want war. Yes he is taking massive risks on the border for his domestic aspirations this time. But its all an election gimmick. It will pass once he wins. Pakistan for him is a card.
And the next time he has to relieve pressure he will go beyond 'strikes'. The only reason we don't have a war is because we show restraint. Had we even sunk their submarine there'd been war.
You really think the international community would let two nuclear powers go to war? There would be mediation straight away when it starts getting scary for the rest of the world.
I don't know where you have been but the international community has done nothing and stayed quiet. Only reason there hasn't been a war is restraint on our part. Otherwise it's now known pretty much Indians were going to attack using missiles till we assured them and other nations of retaliation.
International community would have intervened if it got serious (open declaration of war etc.). Infact nations like Iran, Russia, Canada, China and Turkey openly said they would like to mediate for peace between India and Pakistan.
Having said that, you never know how things would pan out in real. Lets just agree to disagree in this case.
This is gonna sound like some mad conspiracy but I've heard this from a few people.
The 2nd pilot is Israeli and is in Pakistan. Yep you heard it. Israel got involved in attacking Pakistan. This is why India is so silent on it. If it were an Indian pilot they would be going crazy. It's already proven that Israel had something to do with this mini war.
Idk if he's dead but maybe he's just captured or in hospital. I'm intrigued to know what exactly has happened with this second pilot cos clearly 2 planes were shot down.
It's very obvious what happened if you remember the series of events and how they were announced by the two air forces.
1) PAF initially said that one pilot was captured and the other was in hiding in Kashmir. India stated that all their pilots were accounted for.
We know know that the pilot in hiding was Abhinandad who was being beaten up by Pakistani villagers before being captured.
2) The PAF then announced that two pilots were captured and one was receiving treatment at an army hospital. India made no comments for the longest time until the PAF provided video evidence of Abhinandan.
We could all notice the loss of face that India suffered as a result of this capture and the nation-wide trolling that the Pakistanis became obsessed with.
3) The PAF announced that they currently only have one pilot in custody and that he is being treated well. The IAF starts throwing out a bunch of statements such as a downed F-16 and praises Abhinandan but made no statement about the alleged capture of the second pilot.
The Indian media runs with the downed F-16 to try and restore some national pride, even reporting on video game footage.
4) Pakistan releases the pilot as an act of goodwill, gaining renown at the international arena, India calls it a victory because Pakistan only held the pilot for a couple of days and the war hysteria dies down, with both nations mostly satisfied but Pakistan emerging as the clear victor in the eyes of neutrals.
The most likely scenario is that the second pilot was definitely from the IAF but died while under the operating table at the army hospital. The fact that the PAF immediately said that two IAF pilots were captured and that the IAF initially said that no pilots were missing makes me believe that India were going to try and disown both the pilots. That is why they expressed such disgust when Abhinandan was shown sipping tea and complimenting his captors.
However, Pakistan were unable to provide video evidence of the second pilot because he died and therefore, allowed the IAF to disown him and sweep him under the rug. The F-16 story was enough to pacify the nation and they did not need to accuse Pakistan of killing one of its pilots while he was under arrest because that would only lose them more face.
Pakistan also did not have much to gain by blowing the trumpet of capturing two pilots, instead of just one. That would only increase hostilities and both the army and Imran know that would be bad news. The fact that the Indian claims of killing terrorists, downing a jet and doing pretty much anything of note during this skirmish, being brutally exposed by independent experts and verifiers just made the dead IAF pilot even more redundant.
He was the only who was captured first and probably had no interaction with any civilians so it was quite easy to hide both the capture and the operation. On the other side of the border, I'm sure the family was handsomly compensated and told not to look into the cause of death too much. The fact that around four to six IAF servicemen died in Indian territory during the course of these skirmishes in allegedly unrelated events, made the coverup that much easier.
The PM and the army wouldn't have said that there were two pilots and only shown video evidence of one, unless something unexpected, like death, spoiled their plans. Had the pilot been alive, he would have certainly been on video too and the IAF would have acknowledged him, just like they acknowledged Abhinandan. Pakistan have no reason to lie about a second pilot, given all that happened.
israelis have no experience using russian tech, rubbish news, but even though mullahs love to bring israel into everything, this may have been an ISI propaganda, to expose indias relationship with israel as some muslim countries especially iran were getting to comfortable with india.
Not sure if this news is reliable. Sounds more like fiction.
Not sure if this news is reliable. Sounds more like fiction.
[MENTION=77086]cric_man[/MENTION]
Sorry bhai. Been too busy with work. May not be active in forums for a while.
You asked me reg names of pilots killed in Budgam.
I have the name of 3 pilots (from what I checked a couple of weeks back).
Budgam Crash
6 IAF Personnel and 1 civilian died. Rest I dunno.
Sergeant Vikrant Sehrawat
Squadron leader Siddharth Vashisht
Pilot Ninad Mandavgane
Civilian - Kifayat Hussain Ganai
https://scroll.in/latest/914763/jam...rcraft-crashes-in-budgam-district-say-reports
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...ofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst
https://www.thequint.com/news/india...ry-probing-all-angles-including-friendly-fire
If you listen to Imran KHan speech, he said we had pilots with us. Clearly more than one.