What's new

What is the reason for India's dominance in Test cricket at home?

Yep, Pakistan were also unbeaten, home and away from 2010-12, and 2014-16. 7 test series in each period, 14 test series in general, while not beng able to play at home and suffering from a drought of world class players. It was far more monumental an achievement than this.

pakistan is never weak. Never. Always will be a top side. Look at how many bowlers are coming through already. The team looks strong now.

babar azam
shaheen shah
haris sohail
shan masood
rizwan
amir amin


rauf and husnain to come through.
Pakistan will always have great talents. Now they just need to nurture them.

I still back the current young pakistan side to smack England away.
 
I think no team can beat India in India currently. Australia have a small chance but India seem invincible at home.
 
I would just say cut throat competition for places among players, player pool and rotation policy
 
pakistan is never weak. Never. Always will be a top side. Look at how many bowlers are coming through already. The team looks strong now.

babar azam
shaheen shah
haris sohail
shan masood
rizwan
amir amin


rauf and husnain to come through.
Pakistan will always have great talents. Now they just need to nurture them.

I still back the current young pakistan side to smack England away.

If not weak then they certainly have not been consistent and that is the problem, regardless of talent but it also makes the achievements I spoke about even more impressive.
 
Yep, Pakistan were also unbeaten, home and away from 2010-12, and 2014-16. 7 test series in each period, 14 test series in general, while not beng able to play at home and suffering from a drought of world class players. It was far more monumental an achievement than this.

"not beaten" is not equal to winning. 5 of the series were drawn series.

India has won 25 tests lost 1 Drawn 5 some draws were due to rain.

Pakistan won 14 tests lost 5 drawn 7
 
Yep, Pakistan were also unbeaten, home and away from 2010-12, and 2014-16. 7 test series in each period, 14 test series in general, while not beng able to play at home and suffering from a drought of world class players. It was far more monumental an achievement than this.

Winning >>>>>>>>>>> remaining unbeaten. Unbeaten means nothing at home now, anything less than a win is no better than loss.
 
If not weak then they certainly have not been consistent and that is the problem, regardless of talent but it also makes the achievements I spoke about even more impressive.

very strong for odi bro. in a one off game I back them to beat anyone. Even in a series if they have managed to hit their peaks, I would say pakistan can beat anyone on their day.

Consistency is the problem I agree.
Pakistan will always be strong at home in tests. The new zealand loss was an aberration. They will bounce back.

Away games they need to pick the right players that suit the surface they will be playing on. No personal bias, nepotism and poor preparation by going abroad late would definitely improve their chances of winning abroad. The talent is clearly there. Exceptional bowling talent factory as well. Every year we see new talents emerge and pcb will continue to churn out players. It's up to the board to develop them and support them by providing the players with adequate facilities. india and Pakistan will always be the GOAT Asian sides. If anything these two should always play in the final after thumping everyone else.

Like I said in the world cup I have no doubt that pakistam can beat anyone on their day. india, australia doesn't matter. Its a game of inches.

Test matches is where we need to see improvement. On the right track though. Good pace bowlers coming through. It's all about maintain fitness and Imroving their strength plus conditioning in order to adapt to the rigours of test cricket. Batting is getting better and now with babar azam, he could.potnetially revolutionize Pakistan's batting culture.
 
11 consecutive series wins at home

More than the great Windies and the great Aussies now.

This streak at home is now truly etched in history.

Trolls may say whatever it's an official record now

[MENTION=79064]MMHS[/MENTION] [MENTION=131701]Mamoon[/MENTION] @Gurgaon [MENTION=129948]Bilal7[/MENTION] [MENTION=53290]Markhor[/MENTION]

Indeed a great achievement. But, I don't think it's fair to compare this record with different era simply because these days the touring teams get very little time to acclimatize and there are lot more 2/3 Test series played which doesn't give touring side much time to fight back. Quality of opponents are also an issue - apart from AUS & ENG, rest teams are Test minnows these days away from home and more so in India. The only team that could have made a fight with IND in IND was Misbah's PAK with YK and the two spinners at prime, but that series never took place.

Also, as I have mentioned many times in other threads - this is the era when ICC has tried their best to ensure as much overs are possible in a Test which has allowed the better team (IND) to force direct result; otherwise Azhar's team also dominated home series (I believe between 1987 PAK to 2000 SAF, IND didn't lose a home series), but few of the Tests ended in draws for lack of time and the capability of teams bailing out a draw was much better in just about 10-12 years back - more preciously before the game being glorified by the Royal version. Having said that, it's a wonderful achievement never the less and I believe it'll continue for two more years at least.

The title of this thread is about the reason (of this dominance) - apart from usual, I must say two factors are critical for this success: Test focus and playing specialists. Despite IPL glitters, BCCI has kept their priority intact and promoted Test matches as much as possible - money obviously is a factor but we can also say that instead of playing 15-16 Tests per year, had IND played 8-9 Tests and converted those other Tests in to T20I or prolonged IPL - money bag would have been fatter. And, the second reason no one probably had noticed that despite lots of selection controversies, IND has kept Test cricket simple - 11 players for their purpose on specialist role including WK Saha or No. 3 Pujara or opener Muruli Vijay. Even their "all-rounders" are specialist all-rounders (Ashwin & Jadeja are among ATG all-rounders on Indian home stats).

Third factor, which should be mentioned that unlike previous Captains, Kohli is hungry for the win and he doesn't allow the game to drift, has forced the groundsmen to ensure wickets that produces direct results certainly and IND being the better side at home, if all 5 Tests ends in result, at worst IND will win 3. In olden days, Gavaskar led few 5/6 Test series - IND winning the 1st one and rest 4/5 were absolute pain ...., not with Kohli.
 
Not taking anything away from India but most of the teams are at their weakest in the last 25 years. Indian batting and bowling are just too good for these opponents.

Australia, South Africa, and Pakistan would have given a tough fight to India a decade ago. Today, these teams will just get demolished.

No team has figured out a way to survive against Ashwin and Jadeja. That has played a huge part in India's success.
 
Not taking anything away from India but most of the teams are at their weakest in the last 25 years. Indian batting and bowling are just too good for these opponents.
Just the bowling. Indian batting isn't particularly great and there's no reason other teams' batting shouldn't be as good in their home. You can't tell me Kohli, Pujara, Rahane are in the same league as Tendulkar, Dravid, Laxman.
 
Just the bowling. Indian batting isn't particularly great and there's no reason other teams' batting shouldn't be as good in their home. You can't tell me Kohli, Pujara, Rahane are in the same league as Tendulkar, Dravid, Laxman.

You have to give points to Indian batting for consistently putting on big totals. But I agree, overall bowling has been winning India games otherwise we would be seeing high scoring draws.
 
Just the bowling. Indian batting isn't particularly great and there's no reason other teams' batting shouldn't be as good in their home. You can't tell me Kohli, Pujara, Rahane are in the same league as Tendulkar, Dravid, Laxman.

Add Sehwag, Gambhir, Ganguly.
 
Not taking anything away from India but most of the teams are at their weakest in the last 25 years. Indian batting and bowling are just too good for these opponents.

Australia, South Africa, and Pakistan would have given a tough fight to India a decade ago. Today, these teams will just get demolished.

No team has figured out a way to survive against Ashwin and Jadeja. That has played a huge part in India's success.

Ironically, all other nations have been hurt by T20s, but not India. IPL had zero effect on India's test results.
 
Just the bowling. Indian batting isn't particularly great and there's no reason other teams' batting shouldn't be as good in their home. You can't tell me Kohli, Pujara, Rahane are in the same league as Tendulkar, Dravid, Laxman.
those boys are batting greats true but the current lot are much fitter and physically superior which closes the skill gap. This is a fact. Fitness standards are at an all time high. Indian team is easily the fittest team by far. That's exactly why they are well balanced and difficult to beat.
 
Unless you have bowlers like akram,Steyn,McGrath or spinners like swann,Lyon,Saqlain and batsman like steve smith,devillers,amla you can't defeat India at their home.
 
Even india's b team can defeat any team at home.

Bowling might be weaker but batting would be as dangerous. When was the last time India was dismissed under 300 batting first on a pitch that's not a turner? I see India scoring above 500 every other match.
 
Not taking anything away from India but most of the teams are at their weakest in the last 25 years. Indian batting and bowling are just too good for these opponents.

Australia, South Africa, and Pakistan would have given a tough fight to India a decade ago. Today, these teams will just get demolished.

No team has figured out a way to survive against Ashwin and Jadeja. That has played a huge part in India's success.

One could say that the Aussie team of the late 90's and early 2000 got it easy because of a weak NZ team, English team, mediocre Indian team, mediocre Sri Lankan team.
The same could be said about the great West Indian team of 70's and 80's.

You get the point? You can only play the opposition you get. Aint no reason why the opposition cant work harder and get better!
 
One could say that the Aussie team of the late 90's and early 2000 got it easy because of a weak NZ team, English team, mediocre Indian team, mediocre Sri Lankan team.
The same could be said about the great West Indian team of 70's and 80's.

You get the point? You can only play the opposition you get. Aint no reason why the opposition cant work harder and get better!
India makes the look weak. They are all as strong as ever. Fitness is at the highest level. Most of the modern teams would dispatch the old GOAT teams due to superior fitness alone. People at just too delusional. Not to mention lot of them are living in nostalgia.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
One could say that the Aussie team of the late 90's and early 2000 got it easy because of a weak NZ team, English team, mediocre Indian team, mediocre Sri Lankan team.
The same could be said about the great West Indian team of 70's and 80's.

You get the point? You can only play the opposition you get. Aint no reason why the opposition cant work harder and get better!

Newzealand drawn the series in Australia 2001,Indian team smashed them whenever they tour to India,Srilanka also defeated them in their home in 1999,Even though England lost most of series against Australia but still they won matches (maybe few) in Australia.
The fact is teams are weak now,they are failing at home as well.
 
4 Batmen in top 10 .... Indian batting ruling the roost

Capture.JPG
 
Because most teams don't have players who care much about test cricket.

Indian team is a good team but nowhere close to great Australian or WI teams, and if Kohli and Shastri believe otherwise, then they are delusional.
 
Because most teams don't have players who care much about test cricket.

Indian team is a good team but nowhere close to great Australian or WI teams, and if Kohli and Shastri believe otherwise, then they are delusional.

They don't believe that in the slightest. No.1 and GOAT are not same.
 
The Ashwin and Jadeja due is a massive factor. It is very unusual for two world class Test spinners to be so competent with the bat. It is a massive luxury for India.
 
Yeah the magical SG ball that comes out as a grenade when in the hands of Indian bowlers but offers nothing to visiting teams bowlers. :))

SG balls have hidden fingerprint sensors that only gets activated when Indian bowlers are bowling. ICC must probe this as it is serious violation that is putting visiting team under immense disadvantage. While they are at it, should also investigate pitches as it behaves differently when Indian teams bowls or bats.

#SayNoToSGBalls.
 
The tragedy is that he actually believes it. You would think he is trolling but you don’t know him.

If that is the case then there is no cure for delusions.
I seriously hope fans do understand that playing conditions do differ from region to region and that includes type of balls being used.

England use Dukes which is conducive to swing. Australia use Kookabura while India uses SG.

Even if ICC were to mandate just one type of ball being used, the question will remain which one and why?
 
Kohli - his supreme batting in addition to his record breaking captaincy means that he is already pushing for a place among the top 5 cricketers of all time.

Pujara - a classical number 3. Not as good as Dravid, but the best in the world at what he does.

Rohit - the most destructive opener in the world and he will surpass Warner in Test cricket as well.

Ashwin and Jadeja - two of the best Test spinners around and are as good as quite a few batsmen in other sides.

Rahane - not an elite batsman, but an excellent support player who would be the star batsman in quite a few teams.

Saha - best pure WK in the world.

Pant - a maverick, but his outrageous ability cannot be questioned. India will get the best out of him.

Bumrah - best fast bowler in the world.

Shami - one of the best fast bowlers at the moment.

Yadav - massively improved in recent times. He has the ability to be destructive and make an impact with the new ball. An ideal backup for Bumrah, Shami and Ishant.

Ishant - the best workhorse pacer in Test cricket at the moment. The perfect foil for Bumrah and Shami.

This is an incredible team and it is not hard to understand why they are number 1 by a massive margin.

Indian fans are living the dream at the moment.
 
Because most teams don't have players who care much about test cricket.

Indian team is a good team but nowhere close to great Australian or WI teams, and if Kohli and Shastri believe otherwise, then they are delusional.

all top teams care about test cricket. test cricket is real cricket.
India would still thrash both those GOAT teams at home. That's for sure.
 
Kohli - his supreme batting in addition to his record breaking captaincy means that he is already pushing for a place among the top 5 cricketers of all time.

Pujara - a classical number 3. Not as good as Dravid, but the best in the world at what he does.

Rohit - the most destructive opener in the world and he will surpass Warner in Test cricket as well.

Ashwin and Jadeja - two of the best Test spinners around and are as good as quite a few batsmen in other sides.

Rahane - not an elite batsman, but an excellent support player who would be the star batsman in quite a few teams.

Saha - best pure WK in the world.

Pant - a maverick, but his outrageous ability cannot be questioned. India will get the best out of him.

Bumrah - best fast bowler in the world.

Shami - one of the best fast bowlers at the moment.

Yadav - massively improved in recent times. He has the ability to be destructive and make an impact with the new ball. An ideal backup for Bumrah, Shami and Ishant.

Ishant - the best workhorse pacer in Test cricket at the moment. The perfect foil for Bumrah and Shami.

This is an incredible team and it is not hard to understand why they are number 1 by a massive margin.

Indian fans are living the dream at the moment.

You forget the reserves
Shaw and agarwal
Vihari and kuldeep are all in 11 too
Pandya and Jayant yadav
Saini Aaron bhuvi etc ( long list of good backup pacers )

This teams core strength is the reserve bench .
 
You forget the reserves
Shaw and agarwal
Vihari and kuldeep are all in 11 too
Pandya and Jayant yadav
Saini Aaron bhuvi etc ( long list of good backup pacers )

This teams core strength is the reserve bench .

India’s bench strength is best in the world as well, but I was focusing on the players who have played key roles in helping India become the undisputed #1 side in the world.
 
Lots of factors - biggest factor it was always difficult for any team to win in India - even during the golden era of 90s when all teams were strong not many teams won in India. The current teams dont tour well abroad which mean they will have no chance in India because even the teams who toured well couldn't necessarily win in India.

There are many factors why India is a hard place to tour - one of them is what Kholi eluded to recently too many test centers give opposition team no chance of acclimatizing to any one pitch or ground. This is unique to India as they are the biggest country playing test cricket.
 
Bench Strength.

Gill, Shaw, Kuldeep, Chahal, Iyer and Sanju would be in any international teams. Domestic circuit is highly competitive currently.

Watch out for 18yr old Jaiswal.
 
all top teams care about test cricket. test cricket is real cricket.
India would still thrash both those GOAT teams at home. That's for sure.

This is another factor - only England, Australia and India care about test cricket now a days. other teams dont give a **** and their fans dont care much either. When was the last time Pakistan played test cricket? Too long ago to even remember what was the 11.
 
Because most teams don't have players who care much about test cricket.

Indian team is a good team but nowhere close to great Australian or WI teams, and if Kohli and Shastri believe otherwise, then they are delusional.

Wow! So you mean, they just step in the field, go through the routine, get done with it , go home? While their boards spend millions to oganize a test match? Do you really believe?
Anybody who's part of a test team is required to give 1000% on the field. Anybody whos doing that, is giving his best.
So, you are the one who's delusional.
 
This is another factor - only England, Australia and India care about test cricket now a days. other teams dont give a **** and their fans dont care much either. When was the last time Pakistan played test cricket? Too long ago to even remember what was the 11.

Pakistan is still a good test team. They are just rebuilding. They need a new younis khan and moyo. babar and haris can fill that role. rizwan is coming good. I would back even the current side to upset England for example. Very unpredictable team. I really hope they show up vs australia.

Fans care about test. true fans always will. Test cricket is the true form of cricket. South Africa, pakistam and Lanka are just in a rebuilding phase. It will take some time.
 
This is another factor - only England, Australia and India care about test cricket now a days. other teams dont give a **** and their fans dont care much either. When was the last time Pakistan played test cricket? Too long ago to even remember what was the 11.

Nope. South Africa and New Zealand care about test cricket more than LOIs. And the rest don't care/seem to don't care as they are **** in tests
 
Pakistan is still a good test team. They are just rebuilding. They need a new younis khan and moyo. babar and haris can fill that role. rizwan is coming good. I would back even the current side to upset England for example. Very unpredictable team. I really hope they show up vs australia.

Fans care about test. true fans always will. Test cricket is the true form of cricket. South Africa, pakistam and Lanka are just in a rebuilding phase. It will take some time.

It true form of the game is fine and most fans will agree but that doesnt mean they will care about it.
 
Nope. South Africa and New Zealand care about test cricket more than LOIs. And the rest don't care as they are **** in tests.

Newzealand care about test cricket? They play the least amount. I think you knowledge is limited about cricket in Newzealand they dont really care about cricket much in general in Newzealand Rugby is the main sport there.
 
Nope. South Africa and New Zealand care about test cricket more than LOIs. And the rest don't care/seem to don't care as they are **** in tests

And you point about others dont care because they are **** - well thats natural was the same with India until they became No.1 and now suddenly they care before they used to say in this forum we dont care about test cricket much and only England give preference to test cricket over LOIs.
 
Newzealand care about test cricket? They play the least amount. I think you knowledge is limited about cricket in Newzealand they dont really care about cricket much in general in Newzealand Rugby is the main sport there.
.

Playing less tests doesn't mean you don't care about them. When was the last time you saw Williamson or Taylor or Boult being "rested" for tests. They play as full strength as possible and you could see how much it meant to them when they won the series in UAE last year.

And it doesn't matter if rugby is more popular or not. An average Cricket fan in New Zealand would say that test cricket is the ultimate format and the players too know that.
 
.

Playing less tests doesn't mean you don't care about them. When was the last time you saw Williamson or Taylor or Boult being "rested" for tests. They play as full strength as possible and you could see how much it meant to them when they won the series in UAE last year.

And it doesn't matter if rugby is more popular or not. An average Cricket fan in New Zealand would say that test cricket is the ultimate format and the players too know that.

People are not stupid they know test match cricket is the ultimate test they just dont care about it. Same as average person in India knows cricket is not a big sport outside of subcontinent but they dont care about it.

Point here is not which form is the truest form etc - point is not many care about it and the country that care the least is NZ they play the least on purpose.
 
People are not stupid they know test match cricket is the ultimate test they just dont care about it. Same as average person in India knows cricket is not a big sport outside of subcontinent but they dont care about it.

Point here is not which form is the truest form etc - point is not many care about it and the country that care the least is NZ they play the least on purpose.

You said "Teams don't care about Test Cricket" in your earlier post. That's what I refused to believe. Not the "fans don't care" part. Every team values Test Cricket more than any other format and now with the WTC , it has only increased.

Performances in Test Cricket are valued much more either by the team or the players. Sri Lanka were praised to the moon, when they won 2-0 in south Africa. Would the reaction had been same , if they won 2-0 in T20 or ODIs ? A big no.
 
I think one of the main reasons is that India is probably the only country producing domestic batsmen with FC averages of above 50.
 
You said "Teams don't care about Test Cricket" in your earlier post. That's what I refused to believe. Not the "fans don't care" part. Every team values Test Cricket more than any other format and now with the WTC , it has only increased.

Performances in Test Cricket are valued much more either by the team or the players. Sri Lanka were praised to the moon, when they won 2-0 in south Africa. Would the reaction had been same , if they won 2-0 in T20 or ODIs ? A big no.

Team will care and give it priority if the fans care - most fans outside of the BIG 3 dont care about test cricket. So die hard fans like me do care but thats it. Most cricket boards are reliant on money from LOI cricket to run test teams even India. So its a luxury only for the ones who make sufficient money.

I cant remember last time I watched full days test cricket. And the ones that are one sided like the Last SA v India series I dont even bother to look at scoreboard.
 
Team will care and give it priority if the fans care - most fans outside of the BIG 3 dont care about test cricket. So die hard fans like me do care but thats it. Most cricket boards are reliant on money from LOI cricket to run test teams even India. So its a luxury only for the ones who make sufficient money.

I cant remember last time I watched full days test cricket. And the ones that are one sided like the Last SA v India series I dont even bother to look at scoreboard.

Make that Big 3 + South Africa and New Zealand.

The rest are simply not good enough and are rightfully ignored by their fans.
 
Make that Big 3 + South Africa and New Zealand.

The rest are simply not good enough and are rightfully ignored by their fans.

How can Newzealand care as they have clearly stated they want to play less and less Test cricket as it doesn't bring money in that's their stated claim. How can SA care when their main players sign kolpak deals? abd also their priority is to get black players in the team and don't even select their team on merit. I would argue Srilanka and Bangladesh care about test cricket than those two teams. But really its limited to 3 teams India only periodically since they are top in that format right now. Because before that they used to be crazy for LOI cricket and will go back to that once the blip in form happens.
 
[MENTION=142176]Pakhs[/MENTION]

I'm not talking about the money generated. And I don't know what does Saffer players opting for kolpaks has got anything to do with their prioritisation of Test Cricket. They're choosing kolpaks due to the unfair quota system , not because they don't care about Test Cricket. I don't know how you are missing my simple point.

And just the fact that boards are trying to conduct Tests from the revenue generated from other formats tells you how much they value this format. If you ask Williamson or Faf to choose between a Test series win in India or heck even Sri Lanka and an LOI series win in Australia or England , they'll choose the former without hesitation. And there lies everything you should know.
 
[MENTION=142176]Pakhs[/MENTION]

I'm not talking about the money generated. And I don't know what does Saffer players opting for kolpaks has got anything to do with their prioritisation of Test Cricket. They're choosing kolpaks due to the unfair quota system , not because they don't care about Test Cricket. I don't know how you are missing my simple point.

And just the fact that boards are trying to conduct Tests from the revenue generated from other formats tells you how much they value this format. If you ask Williamson or Faf to choose between a Test series win in India or heck even Sri Lanka and an LOI series win in Australia or England , they'll choose the former without hesitation. And there lies everything you should know.

Its you who are missing the point if you ask any player even a player from Afghanistan they will say we will value test wins more - But what does their actions speak? NZ board action speak loud and clear we dont want to care about test cricket because financially its better to be competitive in LOI cricket. They refused to play anyone during the IPL window LOL.

SA board dont care about test cricket if they did they wouldn't choose quota system in test cricket where you really do need your best players - Even their main players dont care because they openly choose Kolpak deals where best you can do is play 4 day cricket if they were so caring for test cricket they wont sign the kolpak deal and play test cricket instead.

Some of their players were regular test started and chose to kick it and go kolpak.
 
Its you who are missing the point if you ask any player even a player from Afghanistan they will say we will value test wins more - But what does their actions speak? NZ board action speak loud and clear we dont want to care about test cricket because financially its better to be competitive in LOI cricket. They refused to play anyone during the IPL window LOL.

SA board dont care about test cricket if they did they wouldn't choose quota system in test cricket where you really do need your best players - Even their main players dont care because they openly choose Kolpak deals where best you can do is play 4 day cricket if they were so caring for test cricket they wont sign the kolpak deal and play test cricket instead.

Some of their players were regular test started and chose to kick it and go kolpak.

South African board has the quotas even during the world cups. Heck, one of the main reasons why South Africa lost the 2015 Semi was the quota system where they were forced to pick Philander over Abbott. So, if they could risk a world cup to ensure they maintain the quotas , Test Cricket is not much infront of that.

And I've already made it clear. I am not talking about the financial gains. I'm speaking from a common player/Team's POV.
 
South African board has the quotas even during the world cups. Heck, one of the main reasons why South Africa lost the 2015 Semi was the quota system where they were forced to pick Philander over Abbott. So, if they could risk a world cup to ensure they maintain the quotas , Test Cricket is not much infront of that.

And I've already made it clear. I am not talking about the financial gains. I'm speaking from a common player/Team's POV.

Anyway this topic is not arguing too much - Test cricket is bit like past days and doesn't really appeal to young audience much. It needs to modernize some things are beign tried as we speak like names behind shirts etc but more needs to be done as of now T20 cricket is the most popular across boards and fans which for me is the most impure form of cricket.
 
Anyway this topic is not arguing too much - Test cricket is bit like past days and doesn't really appeal to young audience much. It needs to modernize some things are beign tried as we speak like names behind shirts etc but more needs to be done as of now T20 cricket is the most popular across boards and fans which for me is the most impure form of cricket.

Fair enough.
 
Anyway this topic is not arguing too much - Test cricket is bit like past days and doesn't really appeal to young audience much. It needs to modernize some things are beign tried as we speak like names behind shirts etc but more needs to be done as of now T20 cricket is the most popular across boards and fans which for me is the most impure form of cricket.

Tests need to go Day & Night to pull audience. Even the recent SA series had mediocre attendence.
 
South African board has the quotas even during the world cups. Heck, one of the main reasons why South Africa lost the 2015 Semi was the quota system where they were forced to pick Philander over Abbott. So, if they could risk a world cup to ensure they maintain the quotas , Test Cricket is not much infront of that.

And I've already made it clear. I am not talking about the financial gains. I'm speaking from a common player/Team's POV.
Abbott was never a good odi bowler anyway. Would have still lost regardless but I agree he is missed in test cricket. I really want to see him come back to s.a and take steyn's spot over nortje.
 
Anyway this topic is not arguing too much - Test cricket is bit like past days and doesn't really appeal to young audience much. It needs to modernize some things are beign tried as we speak like names behind shirts etc but more needs to be done as of now T20 cricket is the most popular across boards and fans which for me is the most impure form of cricket.

I am not sure about other countries. But in India it is still something that any young batsman cherishes. As far as young audience enjoying test is debatable. Even back in the 80s people followed test cricket rather than watching ball by ball. Atleast now you have access to cricinfo, hotstar, willow tv etc. Back then only way youngsters could watch was by cutting the classes. Don't go by attendance on the ground. There are plenty more follow the game.
 
Tests need to go Day & Night to pull audience. Even the recent SA series had mediocre attendence.

I am not sure about other countries. But in India it is still something that any young batsman cherishes. As far as young audience enjoying test is debatable. Even back in the 80s people followed test cricket rather than watching ball by ball. Atleast now you have access to cricinfo, hotstar, willow tv etc. Back then only way youngsters could watch was by cutting the classes. Don't go by attendance on the ground. There are plenty more follow the game.

Yes Day and night test must happen - In the 1980s thats was the way of life but now sports for most people is an enjoyment and event that is more than just winning and losing - like a Hollywood movie. You wouldn't just check how well the movie did in the new paper would you?

People have got many ways of watching test cricket now but they still dont watch it - Test cricket has one fundamental flaw which is against the current world trend where everybody want things done now and quick. The ICC is trying to protect this format as much as they can but reality is only boards that can protect it in its current form have money to burn.
 
Screenshot_20210116-123738_Chrome.jpg

As this comparison shows, in the last 11 years, Indian pitches have offered less spin than those in UAE, Sri Lanka, Windies, Bangladesh etc.
So, those Ppers who insist that India win on custom made rank turners are wrong as usual!
 
Back
Top