Why right wing Hindus in India hate Imran Khan for no apparent reason?

I have already addressed this in previous posts. Having read Imran Khan's views prior to becoming PM, his views re India have always been positive about the country as a whole. It was his misfortune to become PM when India had a hindutva govt which cannot contemplate normalising relations with Pakistan because it is against their very ideology

I'm pretty confident the Hindutva/BJP government would be happy to set up Imran as a figure to fear just as they are happy to currently use the Army puppet government. If anything, they must've been pretty pleased at his absurd overreaction to the removal of Article 370. All the remaining minor links were cut off.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Imran Khan isn't PM of the country because he criticised the military, he's in jail. That means you can't have any meaningful debate about hindutva hatred of Khan without discussing Pakistan's military role in deposing him.

But why would we (Indians) care why he is in jail. That is for you Pakistani's to discuss. Lets be honest, this thread was created to stroke the ego that look Imran Khan is such a popular leader, so much so that all Modi supporters hate him etc. It is hilarious attempt but a total lie.

Let me spell it out again, no one from India cares about Imran Khan or why is he in jail. Unlike you guys who are obsessed with Modi or what law Yogi Adityanath is passing in UP, we dont know much about Pak politics. I didnt even knew there is a political party called PTI exists until I read some threads here.

For us Indians, especially North Indians, there is only one view about Pakistan...which you would not like to hear.

:uakmal

#FACT
 
It seems Indians are more interested in Imran Khan's sex life as a bachelor back in his playing days in a liberal capital city of Europe than his life as a politician in Pakistan. People go through different stages in life, if he wanted to continue living that lifestyle he would probably have stayed in London.
 
But why would we (Indians) care why he is in jail. That is for you Pakistani's to discuss. Lets be honest, this thread was created to stroke the ego that look Imran Khan is such a popular leader, so much so that all Modi supporters hate him etc. It is hilarious attempt but a total lie.

Let me spell it out again, no one from India cares about Imran Khan or why is he in jail. Unlike you guys who are obsessed with Modi or what law Yogi Adityanath is passing in UP, we dont know much about Pak politics. I didnt even knew there is a political party called PTI exists until I read some threads here.

For us Indians, especially North Indians, there is only one view about Pakistan...which you would perhaps wont like to hear.

#FACT

I would love to hear it. Please enlighten us.
 
For us Indians, Imran Khan or Shabaz Shariff or Zardari or whatever...we simply don't care about Pak politics. All same in our eyes. We don't go around and open thread similar to 'Will Rahul Gandhi become next PM' for a Pak leader. That is called real obsession.
 
For us Indians, Imran Khan or Shabaz Shariff or Zardari or whatever...we simply don't care about Pak politics. All same in our eyes. We don't go around and open thread similar to 'Will Rahul Gandhi become next PM' for a Pak leader. That is called real obsession.
To be honest, even for Pakistan, I think it matters very little if Modi or someone else is PM. Just like Pakistan policies towards India, Indian policies towards Pakistan are pretty much set and supported by public opinion. No politician would bother expending political capital to gain nothing from making peace overtures towards Pakistan.
 
Again - I would love to hear it. Please enlighten.

Not relevant to this thread. The only thing you need to know Indians don't care about Imran Khan or Pakistani politics in genreal...unlike OP who thinks Right Wing Hindus obsessed with him.


:uakmal
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Silly if true. Him being in power or not impacts them very little. I could understand Indian Muslims wanting him out of power - he'd done a lot of barking without much bite towards them but Pakistanis?
 
Warning: Guys any irrational remark regarding Pakistan's people and IK personal life would be removed. This is not a thread on someone's personal life.
 
Not relevant to this thread. The only thing you need to know Indians don't care about Imran Khan or Pakistani politics in genreal...unlike OP who thinks Right Wing Hindus obsessed with him.


:uakmal
And you would be the first one in line to take his autograph if he came to your city today 😁
 
And you would be the first one in line to take his autograph if he came to your city today 😁
I wont bro but others may just to show off in social media. This has nothing to do with Imran though, I will not take autograph even if Dhoni, Kohli or Rohit Sharma comes in my city. This is just my nature.

The only person I will take autograph & picture with is Narendra Modi.
 
And you would be the first one in line to take his autograph if he came to your city today 😁
Only if you guys had that mentality he wouldn’t be unjustly in jail, Indians at least gave him respect whenever he came to India, unlike Pakistanis who have jailed him with no light.
 
Most of the Hindutva keyboard warriors do not know this, but their grandparents had posters of Imran Khan plastered over their walls.

They hate him cos till this day not a single Indian has topped IK in looks and swagger - the best India has is AI, and Modi as a reserve specialist.
 
Most of the Hindutva keyboard warriors do not know this, but their grandparents had posters of Imran Khan plastered over their walls.

They hate him cos till this day not a single Indian has topped IK in looks and swagger - the best India has is AI, and Modi as a reserve specialist.
My father knew him as Im The Dim (his name during his Oxford days), and people of this generation know him as someone who believes Germany and Japan share borders, and that trees and plants produce oxygen at night.
 
I don’t see any hatred for IK among the keyboard warriors.

More hatred for Erdogan, Qatar as far as I see.
 
I don’t see any hatred for IK among the keyboard warriors.

More hatred for Erdogan, Qatar as far as I see.
Just look at the posts here and you will see what's going on. Imran seems to have caused long lasting damage to "SOME" Indians who now want to spread derogatory and false claims about him everywhere.
 
I feel its in the best interest of India (or at least India believes its in its best interest) that Pakistan continues its downward spiral with the military establishment and their gang of thieves in charge. Of course why wouldn't you? Any enemy country would wish the same.

Imran is the only guy who challenged this hegemony, so it makes perfect sense why they don't like him.
 
Just look at the posts here and you will see what's going on. Imran seems to have caused long lasting damage to "SOME" Indians who now want to spread derogatory and false claims about him everywhere.
Straight up Ad hominem, you conveniently skip pretty fiery discussions and the extreme languages being used by PTI supporters and opponents of Pakistan, just obsessed with what a few Indian posters have to post about.
What lasting damage have Indians done to "some" White people? :unsure:
 
I feel its in the best interest of India (or at least India believes its in its best interest) that Pakistan continues its downward spiral with the military establishment and their gang of thieves in charge. Of course why wouldn't you? Any enemy country would wish the same.

Imran is the only guy who challenged this hegemony, so it makes perfect sense why they don't like him.
Honestly I'd be surprised if Indians (except for the few on this forum whose objective is to troll the rabid Imran fans) care very much about hating Imran Khan. He was pretty undistinguishable from the typical Pakistani leader for most Indians.

Even from a more strategic perspective, it's a choice between his incompetence and the military's venality. Six of one...half a dozen of the other.

Personally I think we'd be better served with a democratically elected leader in charge of Pakistan. Such leaders have several constituencies to answer to and are less prone to misadventures. However, it's not like the Pakistani establishment would really be completely out of power after 75 years of ruling the nation so it makes very little difference.
 
Honestly I'd be surprised if Indians (except for the few on this forum whose objective is to troll the rabid Imran fans) care very much about hating Imran Khan. He was pretty undistinguishable from the typical Pakistani leader for most Indians.

Even from a more strategic perspective, it's a choice between his incompetence and the military's venality. Six of one...half a dozen of the other.

Personally I think we'd be better served with a democratically elected leader in charge of Pakistan. Such leaders have several constituencies to answer to and are less prone to misadventures. However, it's not like the Pakistani establishment would really be completely out of power after 75 years of ruling the nation so it makes very little difference.

If they don't know much and its indistinguishable its interesting to note you took time to level this accusation about his leadership. I wonder what that is about then.


For the record, I feel Indian government has had this policy where they tend to favor a military dictatorship in Pakistan and tend to get along well with them more than the democratically elected (if such a thing exists in Pakistan) government. Also the Indian team never got approval to play in Pakistan when there was an elected or selected government in place. But they seemed to be open to it when Musharraf was in charge. I wonder what that is about.

By the way, the last election was hands down won by PTI and IK. I personally know that Imran in charge without the control and influence of military is the best option for Pakistan. But I also know whether Hindus here troll or not, they would definitely not have a good feeling about it. Indian Muslims feel differently about IK, I have noticed.
 
If they don't know much and its indistinguishable its interesting to note you took time to level this accusation about his leadership. I wonder what that is about then.


For the record, I feel Indian government has had this policy where they tend to favor a military dictatorship in Pakistan and tend to get along well with them more than the democratically elected (if such a thing exists in Pakistan) government. Also the Indian team never got approval to play in Pakistan when there was an elected or selected government in place. But they seemed to be open to it when Musharraf was in charge. I wonder what that is about.

By the way, the last election was hands down won by PTI and IK. I personally know that Imran in charge without the control and influence of military is the best option for Pakistan. But I also know whether Hindus here troll or not, they would definitely not have a good feeling about it. Indian Muslims feel differently about IK, I have noticed.
Because whoever is the “democratically” elected leader in Pakistan the rulers are the Establishment.
GOI just wastes time when engaging with Shariffs and Bhuttos, it makes much more sense engaging with Establishment directly.

Vajpayee literally went from ver and beyond with Shariff to get Kargil, then went over and beyond even with Mushraff, that man couldn’t had done more.
 
If they don't know much and its indistinguishable its interesting to note you took time to level this accusation about his leadership. I wonder what that is about then.


For the record, I feel Indian government has had this policy where they tend to favor a military dictatorship in Pakistan and tend to get along well with them more than the democratically elected (if such a thing exists in Pakistan) government. Also the Indian team never got approval to play in Pakistan when there was an elected or selected government in place. But they seemed to be open to it when Musharraf was in charge. I wonder what that is about.
You have literally NO IDEA about India-Pakistan dynamics at all sir. Literally none. You are just projecting western style of engagement onto South Asia.
 
Because whoever is the “democratically” elected leader in Pakistan the rulers are the Establishment.
GOI just wastes time when engaging with Shariffs and Bhuttos, it makes much more sense engaging with Establishment directly.
to some extent I can understand but the selected leaders almost always got their direction from the military to begin with. So from that point it does not make sense to me. It almost felt like they were trying to make sure even though selected, the government cannot get any credit for establishing cordial relations with India because it might empower them and challenge the military hegemony.

You and most Indian posters here will probably not believe it but an overwhelming majority of Pakistanis actually do want peace and cordial relations with India. Any move or news by the government that facilitates that is actually received well by the masses and increases the popularity of whosoever is in the government.
 
Warning: Guys any irrational remark regarding Pakistan's people and IK personal life would be removed. This is not a thread on someone's personal life.
How can you not comment about IK's personal life when the Title of the thread is why Rightwing Hindus hate IK :misbah :ROFLMAO:

Imran is not a religious figure or God. So any criticism about his political and personal life will be game(y)
 
You have literally NO IDEA about India-Pakistan dynamics at all sir. Literally none. You are just projecting western style of engagement onto South Asia.
- So writes an Indian Hindu very confidently online and provides tons of argument to support his claim.

oh wait! :sneaky:
 
How can you not comment about IK's personal life when the Title of the thread is why Rightwing Hindus hate IK :misbah :ROFLMAO:

Imran is not a religious figure or God. So any criticism about his political and personal life will be game(y)
We should be asking in the Modi thread if he consulted a Hakeem saab or some pandit shandit for his issues, thats the most polite way I can really put it right now, hoping you will use the right part of your brain to decipher the message, not the part that keeps telling you the sun is stationary as you always claim.

Would that have been agreeable to you as well?
 
How can you not comment about IK's personal life when the Title of the thread is why Rightwing Hindus hate IK :misbah :ROFLMAO:

Imran is not a religious figure or God. So any criticism about his political and personal life will be game(y)
- So writes an Indian Hindu very confidently online and provides tons of argument to support his claim.

oh wait! :sneaky:
Just look at the posts here and you will see what's going on. Imran seems to have caused long lasting damage to "SOME" Indians who now want to spread derogatory and false claims about him everywhere.
This thread is meant for one sided narrative, not discussion.
 
the theme continues. One can claim whatever one wants, even claim to disown their own faith. I see that all the time here with you lot. Once again, phrasing it as politely as I can.
You haven't answered about the mental damage that causes the obsession about Indians and your allergy to any opinions Indian can or cannot have.

You are not one bit polite,sir. Just arrogant, ignorant and snobbish. Saying it in the politest way possible.
 
If they don't know much and its indistinguishable its interesting to note you took time to level this accusation about his leadership. I wonder what that is about then.


For the record, I feel Indian government has had this policy where they tend to favor a military dictatorship in Pakistan and tend to get along well with them more than the democratically elected (if such a thing exists in Pakistan) government. Also the Indian team never got approval to play in Pakistan when there was an elected or selected government in place. But they seemed to be open to it when Musharraf was in charge. I wonder what that is about.

By the way, the last election was hands down won by PTI and IK. I personally know that Imran in charge without the control and influence of military is the best option for Pakistan. But I also know whether Hindus here troll or not, they would definitely not have a good feeling about it. Indian Muslims feel differently about IK, I have noticed.
I'll start with the last part where I'm pretty much in alignment with you. Imran Khan seems to have won the last election and deserves to govern. Whether he can do so without the control and influence of the military is debatable since the military is woven into the very fabric of Pakistan - every State owned enterprise, every semi-governmental body (including sports bodies), even private business has either serving or retired military influence. Even the cops know where the real power is.

As far as your comment on the Indian government is concerned, I think they've realised over the last 20 odd years that dealing with Pakistan IS dealing with the military. Talking to the occasional civilian facade is pointless. I don't think it's a matter of preference but maybe it is since a deal with the military is likely to stick while a deal with any civilian government isn't worth the paper it's printed on. I'm not saying it's right but it's the reality of the situation.

Now as to Imran Khan.
- Firstly I start with the assumption that anyone without experience in running a state/provincial government or at least a significant ministry is unfit to run a country - Trumpian in a sense though he at least had some experience running a decent sized corporate entity.
- Secondly I got the distinct impression that he seemed to run the government on instinct and gut feel rather than logic. Sometimes it worked as in the case of the COVID response. Mostly it didn't as evidenced by the number of U-turns during his administration.
- Finally, I mainly judge his competence by the field I most understand - economics where to me he seemed uniquely clueless. He ran through 5 Finance ministers finally reverting to probably the most unsuited of the lot in Shaukat Tarin. He kicked the can on the inevitable IMF program for ages and then violated the conditions even after recieving several COVID crisis related concessions. I think it goes back to his lack of experience in real life governance even at a smaller scale.
 
I'll start with the last part where I'm pretty much in alignment with you. Imran Khan seems to have won the last election and deserves to govern. Whether he can do so without the control and influence of the military is debatable since the military is woven into the very fabric of Pakistan - every State owned enterprise, every semi-governmental body (including sports bodies), even private business has either serving or retired military influence. Even the cops know where the real power is.

As far as your comment on the Indian government is concerned, I think they've realised over the last 20 odd years that dealing with Pakistan IS dealing with the military. Talking to the occasional civilian facade is pointless. I don't think it's a matter of preference but maybe it is since a deal with the military is likely to stick while a deal with any civilian government isn't worth the paper it's printed on. I'm not saying it's right but it's the reality of the situation.

Now as to Imran Khan.
- Firstly I start with the assumption that anyone without experience in running a state/provincial government or at least a significant ministry is unfit to run a country - Trumpian in a sense though he at least had some experience running a decent sized corporate entity.
- Secondly I got the distinct impression that he seemed to run the government on instinct and gut feel rather than logic. Sometimes it worked as in the case of the COVID response. Mostly it didn't as evidenced by the number of U-turns during his administration.
- Finally, I mainly judge his competence by the field I most understand - economics where to me he seemed uniquely clueless. He ran through 5 Finance ministers finally reverting to probably the most unsuited of the lot in Shaukat Tarin. He kicked the can on the inevitable IMF program for ages and then violated the conditions even after recieving several COVID crisis related concessions. I think it goes back to his lack of experience in real life governance even at a smaller scale.
He actually did have some governance experience in KPK though indirect. Pakistan has gotten to a point where you want an honest man who doesn't look after the interests of the few in the dynastic parties and military. To Pakistnais, that's what Imran offers and it papers over his other drawbacks.

Yes, everyone has flaws and Imran has his flaws as well. I think the nature of human learning involves making mistakes, and moving on. But in his rather short tenure, his successes outnumber his failures. Some of the problems you cited can be attributed to him being tied down by the military establishment. But I am not going to even go into details of it because that's not the point of this thread. But in any case painting him as downright incompetent is absolutely incorrect, IN MY VIEW.

You are entitled to yours
 
He actually did have some governance experience in KPK though indirect. Pakistan has gotten to a point where you want an honest man who doesn't look after the interests of the few in the dynastic parties and military. To Pakistnais, that's what Imran offers and it papers over his other drawbacks.

Yes, everyone has flaws and Imran has his flaws as well. I think the nature of human learning involves making mistakes, and moving on. But in his rather short tenure, his successes outnumber his failures. Some of the problems you cited can be attributed to him being tied down by the military establishment. But I am not going to even go into details of it because that's not the point of this thread. But in any case painting him as downright incompetent is absolutely incorrect, IN MY VIEW.

You are entitled to yours
Yeah KPK is a major bone to pick. He won the election and should've taken the responsibility of administration. Would've been invaluable experience even if at a small scale. Trying to run a country of 250 Million with no prior experience in day to day administration is just wrong so his mistakes were not necessarily unexpected just unfortunate.

Yes he had a clean image. A close parallel would be Obama in his first term and I remember him floundering. However he had the benefit of hugely experienced folks like Biden, Gates, Geithner and a massive governance infrastructure that could pretty much run on autopilot irrespective of the figurehead on top. Imran didn't chose to go with that and when he did have someone competent like Hafeez Shaikh, he fired him when he heard bad news.

To come back to the point of the thread, I think assuming right wing Hindus hate Imran Khan is pointless paranoia coloured by the few baiters you interact with here. At the most, there might be some resentment at what was perceived as overreaction to the Article 370 revocation but to most right wing Indians (and Indians in general), he's not relevant. We know who matters in Pakistan.
 
Yeah KPK is a major bone to pick. He won the election and should've taken the responsibility of administration. Would've been invaluable experience even if at a small scale. Trying to run a country of 250 Million with no prior experience in day to day administration is just wrong so his mistakes were not necessarily unexpected just unfortunate.

Yes he had a clean image. A close parallel would be Obama in his first term and I remember him floundering. However he had the benefit of hugely experienced folks like Biden, Gates, Geithner and a massive governance infrastructure that could pretty much run on autopilot irrespective of the figurehead on top. Imran didn't chose to go with that and when he did have someone competent like Hafeez Shaikh, he fired him when he heard bad news.

To come back to the point of the thread, I think assuming right wing Hindus hate Imran Khan is pointless paranoia coloured by the few baiters you interact with here. At the most, there might be some resentment at what was perceived as overreaction to the Article 370 revocation but to most right wing Indians (and Indians in general), he's not relevant. We know who matters in Pakistan.

Hafiz Sheikh had lost his seat. I think there are many views of the same event happening and more you scrutinize you can continue to find excuses. This is typical of Imran's critics within Pakistan as well and I don't understand it one bit.

On one hand we have dynastic people like Bilawal (zero experience) becomes FM straight off the bat. Maryam Nawaz (zero experiences) comes in and becomes the CM of Punjab, the second most powerful position after PM, (third most if you count COAS as #1).

Compared to all these "do gooders" yeah Imran looks like evil incarnate, doesn't he? lol
 
Hafiz Sheikh had lost his seat. I think there are many views of the same event happening and more you scrutinize you can continue to find excuses. This is typical of Imran's critics within Pakistan as well and I don't understand it one bit.

On one hand we have dynastic people like Bilawal (zero experience) becomes FM straight off the bat. Maryam Nawaz (zero experiences) comes in and becomes the CM of Punjab, the second most powerful position after PM, (third most if you count COAS as #1).

Compared to all these "do gooders" yeah Imran looks like evil incarnate, doesn't he? lol
I think the one thing you can acquit Imran Khan of is malafide intentions - even his worst critics seem to agree he mostly meant well. Corruption, if any (I'm in no position to judge the Toshakhana case), seems to be minor and typical of any government in the world.

However, the issue with government is that intentions don't always translate to results. Manmohan Singh was probably one of the most honest prime ministers we've had but his decade of being head of government was a lost decade for India in terms of reform and economic growth. On the other PV Narasimha Rao was a career politician and typically venial but his 5 years was a paradigm shift in the Indian economy. Modi is a pompous Muslim baiter but has learned to trust competent folks to run key ministries.

In the end, I think corruption is overrated as way to evaluate politician fitness for administration. You don't want Zardari level of corruption but as the electoral bond reveal in India shows, it's best to assume a base level of corruption for all politicians and then judge based on competence.
 
Honestly I'd be surprised if Indians (except for the few on this forum whose objective is to troll the rabid Imran fans) care very much about hating Imran Khan. He was pretty undistinguishable from the typical Pakistani leader for most Indians.

Even from a more strategic perspective, it's a choice between his incompetence and the military's venality. Six of one...half a dozen of the other.

Personally I think we'd be better served with a democratically elected leader in charge of Pakistan. Such leaders have several constituencies to answer to and are less prone to misadventures. However, it's not like the Pakistani establishment would really be completely out of power after 75 years of ruling the nation so it makes very little difference.

I agree. I think most Indians hate Pakistani leaders regardless of who they are. Imran Khan is neither here nor there, althought they might hate him a little bit more simply because he has a backbone.
 
I think the one thing you can acquit Imran Khan of is malafide intentions - even his worst critics seem to agree he mostly meant well. Corruption, if any (I'm in no position to judge the Toshakhana case), seems to be minor and typical of any government in the world.

However, the issue with government is that intentions don't always translate to results. Manmohan Singh was probably one of the most honest prime ministers we've had but his decade of being head of government was a lost decade for India in terms of reform and economic growth. On the other PV Narasimha Rao was a career politician and typically venial but his 5 years was a paradigm shift in the Indian economy. Modi is a pompous Muslim baiter but has learned to trust competent folks to run key ministries.

In the end, I think corruption is overrated as way to evaluate politician fitness for administration. You don't want Zardari level of corruption but as the electoral bond reveal in India shows, it's best to assume a base level of corruption for all politicians and then judge based on competence.
In Pakistan's case, when the coffers are bare, and the same people have been draining the country for close to 40 years, I am afraid corruption is the best and only yardstick. At this point, people will pick a village idiot over these guys, that's the sad truth.

Imran definitely feels like heaven sent, despite all his flaws. Most people here (and elsewhere) who are massive critics of Imran, will probably admit this to themselves in private but if you look at their comments for picking on Imran, it's usually a long the lines of him being a playboy in the past, marrying a woman who had not allegedly completed her iddat, stealing a watch (by the way that case has been dismissed), U turns, etc. They cherry pick some areas to prove his incompetence.

I think you cannot gage his competence in a mere three and a half or four years in the position when the others have completed multiple term of similar length in the office and they are somehow protected and beyond such criticism.

Another bone I have seen Hindu Indians pick with Imran is because they view him as a radical or Taliban sympathizer. I think at best he wanted peace and wanted to negotiate with them rather than continue to fight against them when it is not our war. He sympathized with them, which I feel is wrong on moral grounds but as a politician I can understand why he does not want to antagonize them.

Another reason why especially the Hindutva people don't like him is because he called out Modi and his treatment of Muslims in India. I know he made efforts and tried to promote image that we are trying to take better care of our minorities than India is, and whether that is true or false, is another matter but I feel that really angered Hindutva Indians as well.

You may claim those might be just a handful of people here on the forum, but I have personally seen some Indians in real life as well who have made some bitter remarks about that. Maybe they are just Indian Americans and not resident Indians who feel that way, I cannot speak to that.
 
Don’t hate Imran Khan. If anything respected and admired him as a cricketer.

While the trolling he received for being Pak Pm and his political rhetoric aside, never had a doubt that “in his mind” (keyword) he was thinking he was doing what was best for 2 most important things he cares for- Pakistan and his own ego.

The problem is never with Imran Khan. Whatever material he gives for trolling and mocking right now writes itself.

However what I notice is back in the day when he was at the helm, you saw some of the most toxic and vile comments about India and Indians. Thats because most of IK’s followers are probably overseas ones with education or lack of education but English as their native language. So, the volume of trolling looked much larger.

Today a lot of those folks seem to have mellowed down.

The ones who have no other topics or ability to carry any other conversation are still stuck in the same old Moody, RSS, Hindutavavava rhetoric without any head or tail.

Thats about it.
 
Don’t hate Imran Khan. If anything respected and admired him as a cricketer.

While the trolling he received for being Pak Pm and his political rhetoric aside, never had a doubt that “in his mind” (keyword) he was thinking he was doing what was best for 2 most important things he cares for- Pakistan and his own ego.

The problem is never with Imran Khan. Whatever material he gives for trolling and mocking right now writes itself.

However what I notice is back in the day when he was at the helm, you saw some of the most toxic and vile comments about India and Indians. Thats because most of IK’s followers are probably overseas ones with education or lack of education but English as their native language. So, the volume of trolling looked much larger.

Today a lot of those folks seem to have mellowed down.

The ones who have no other topics or ability to carry any other conversation are still stuck in the same old Moody, RSS, Hindutavavava rhetoric without any head or tail.

Thats about it.
Nonsense post. Most overseas Pakistani live side by side with Indians and have very good relations with them. Most Indians who are cordial with us actually hate Modi and RSS probably more than Pakistanis do. Comments you are attributing to overseas Pakistanis are actually most often associated with overseas Indians here in the States that I socialize with. Before you ask, this subsection includes mostly Hindus or cultural Hindus, then Muslims.
 
Nonsense post. Most overseas Pakistani live side by side with Indians and have very good relations with them. Most Indians who are cordial with us actually hate Modi and RSS probably more than Pakistanis do. Comments you are attributing to overseas Pakistanis are actually most often associated with overseas Indians here in the States that I socialize with. Before you ask, this subsection includes mostly Hindus or cultural Hindus, then Muslims.
Ah the source of expertise over everything South Asia!! 👏
 
Ah the source of expertise over everything South Asia!! 👏
You don't read well do you. I have lived for over thirty years in the states with the same groups of Pakistanis and Indians as friends I made through school in the 90s. If you want a more expert account of Pakistani and Indian Americans, you will have to find someone who has lived here longer than I have with a larger social circle on this forum. Good luck with that!

I never claimed to be an expert on people living in India and Pakistan. That is a manifestation of your own absurd mind.
 
to some extent I can understand but the selected leaders almost always got their direction from the military to begin with. So from that point it does not make sense to me. It almost felt like they were trying to make sure even though selected, the government cannot get any credit for establishing cordial relations with India because it might empower them and challenge the military hegemony.

You and most Indian posters here will probably not believe it but an overwhelming majority of Pakistanis actually do want peace and cordial relations with India. Any move or news by the government that facilitates that is actually received well by the masses and increases the popularity of whosoever is in the government.
I agree and I’m sure majority Indians want peace, most of uncles and auntys thought it will happen during Mushraff era
Nonsense post. Most overseas Pakistani live side by side with Indians and have very good relations with them. Most Indians who are cordial with us actually hate Modi and RSS probably more than Pakistanis do. Comments you are attributing to overseas Pakistanis are actually most often associated with overseas Indians here in the States that I socialize with. Before you ask, this subsection includes mostly Hindus or cultural Hindus, then Muslims.
Naw British Pakistanis were trolling Indians day and night, even covid delta massacre they trolled us(I was in Indis then and first hand saw the situation).
 
You don't read well do you. I have lived for over thirty years in the states with the same groups of Pakistanis and Indians as friends I made through school in the 90s. If you want a more expert account of Pakistani and Indian Americans, you will have to find someone who has lived here longer than I have with a larger social circle on this forum. Good luck with that!

I never claimed to be an expert on people living in India and Pakistan. That is a manifestation of your own absurd mind.
Well travelled, well connected doesnt always guarantee enlightenment. Generally, when we encounter diverse views we are humbled by learning from different POVs. Initially, I was inclined to believe you are one of those person genuinely interested in a different POVs but that's not really the case here. You have a set perspective which is incredibly stubborn and somehow very thin skin too and forces you to resort to name calling like a little 5 year old.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I agree and I’m sure majority Indians want peace, most of uncles and auntys thought it will happen during Mushraff era

Naw British Pakistanis were trolling Indians day and night, even covid delta massacre they trolled us(I was in Indis then and first hand saw the situation).
I have been to the UK a few times but never lived there. I cannot speak very well for them. Perhaps I should have been clear I meant US Pakistanis and Indians when I said overseas.
 
I have been to the UK a few times but never lived there. I cannot speak very well for them. Perhaps I should have been clear I meant US Pakistanis and Indians when I said overseas.
I have Pakistani Acquaintances and friends from Canada and US too and majority that immigrated from Pakistan are nicest people.

The ones that are First/ second gen are the worst.(personal opinion)
 
I have Pakistani Acquaintances and friends from Canada and US too and majority that immigrated from Pakistan are nicest people.

The ones that are First/ second gen are the worst.(personal opinion)
In what sense?
 
Well travelled, well connected doesnt always guarantee enlightenment. Generally, when we encounter diverse views we are humbled by learning from different POVs. Initially, I was inclined to believe you are one of those person genuinely interested in a different POVs but that's not really the case here. You have a set perspective which is incredibly stubborn and somehow very thin skin too and forces you to resort to name calling like a little 5 year old.

Going by the long posts and personal attacks you are launching on me clearly shows who possess a thin skin here. I say more power to you and carry on doing what you are doing. You are doing a wonderful job!

fer kehndey boota gaalan kad'da! :coffee:
 
In what sense?
Obnoxious sense, the ones who moved from Pakistan are more exposed to Indian culture and don’t have the same dislike towards us that many Pakistanis born here to rich Pakistani immigrants do.

This is just my personal opinion, second gen Pakistanis look down upon Hindus(esp South Indians) and Indians, identical view to that of @Pakistanian poster about dressing sense smell, accent etc etc
 
Going by the long posts and personal attacks you are launching on me clearly shows who possess a thin skin here. I say more power to you and carry on doing what you are doing. You are doing a wonderful job!

fer kehndey boota gaalan kad'da! :coffee:
Just responding in kind, Dont dish out Ad hominem attacks if you cant take it.
Simple!! and we go back to civilized discussions!
 
Obnoxious sense, the ones who moved from Pakistan are more exposed to Indian culture and don’t have the same dislike towards us many Pakistanis born here to rich Pakistani immigrants do.

This is just my personal opinion, second gen Pakistanis look down upon Hindus and Indians, identical view to that of @Pakistanian poster about dressing sense smell, accent etc etc

I get it, that disdain is common sometimes for their own people back home.i.e, Pakistanis and not limited to just Indians.
I guess in this particular scenario not all are the same. I know we have already set a precedent for stereotyping by saying most people we have met are nice, which I guess is probably not the right thing to do either but let me course correct.

We are all economic migrants. But there are the professionals and then there are the business class types who almost in all cases started off as blue collar working class types. I hate to admit some of their children tend to be the snots you mentioned. I went to school with quite a few of them. They drove around in their expensive cars while I was taking the metro. LOL

The humility and down to earth nature I find and associate with first and second and even third gen children of Pakistani origin here are those where the parents are either professional, educated or deeply religious blue collar types. All such children I see at our local masjid are absolutely wonderful, well mannered and care for any needy new immigrant families. This dynamic changes though when you step out of small-medium size town to say big metros like NYC, LA, Chicago, etc
 
Don’t hate Imran Khan. If anything respected and admired him as a cricketer.

While the trolling he received for being Pak Pm and his political rhetoric aside, never had a doubt that “in his mind” (keyword) he was thinking he was doing what was best for 2 most important things he cares for- Pakistan and his own ego.

The problem is never with Imran Khan. Whatever material he gives for trolling and mocking right now writes itself.

However what I notice is back in the day when he was at the helm, you saw some of the most toxic and vile comments about India and Indians. Thats because most of IK’s followers are probably overseas ones with education or lack of education but English as their native language. So, the volume of trolling looked much larger.

Today a lot of those folks seem to have mellowed down.

The ones who have no other topics or ability to carry any other conversation are still stuck in the same old Moody, RSS, Hindutavavava rhetoric without any head or tail.

Thats about it.

It appears that the focus on Hindutva bigotry by Imran Khan’s supporters has upset you, and it seems likely you’ll remain unsettled if others continue to highlight it.

The concern seems to lie not with the specific criticism but with anyone bringing attention to Hindutva extremism.

It’s important to distinguish between critiques of Hindutva ideology and general criticisms of India. Naturally, Pakistanis are within their right to address both.
 
Just responding in kind, Dont dish out Ad hominem attacks if you cant take it.
Simple!! and we go back to civilized discussions!

Wow! I seem to be living rent free in your head. Tell you what, if you think I am dishing out "Ad Hominem" attacks, as long as I am not violating any forum rules and the mods don't censure or ban me, they will continue. If that gets your undies in a twist, please refer to the ignore function or report me. If you think somehow you will convince me to stop my "alleged attacks", good luck! You have a better chance at convincing @Bhaijaan to stop being a troll.

You are starting to really entertain me now. Kindly continue :ROFLMAO:
 
It’s important to distinguish between critiques of Hindutva ideology and general criticisms of India. Naturally, Pakistanis are within their right to address both.
Pakistan is a nation founded on the philosophy that Muslims can’t co exist with Hindus. India is a secular country. So No, “Hindutva ideology”shouldn’t concern you.

are you concerned about humanity or Muslims? I don’t think so.

Then,I would assume you can look inwards in where Pakistan there are probably 50 instances way worse than Gujarat riots. How are Hindus doing in Pak? How about Ahmadis? So save me this bs that your heart bleeds for Gujarat. People have listed 100 things way worse than Gujarat that have happened in India, Pakistan and all over the world.

I will tell you what lights that smoke or hurt in the backside. The guy who you thought will be a messiah turned out to be a total clown show while Modi has had more wins than losses in his the last 10 years diplomatically,politically and economy wise.

Probably, that made some Indians brag and become obnoxious and rub it . I can see that causing an issue. Thats the only reason why most of you are hung up on Modi. Even if Imran tuned out to be half-decent probably the toxicity would be way less because there would be a lot more stuff to discuss about Pak.
 
Pakistan is a nation founded on the philosophy that Muslims can’t co exist with Hindus. India is a secular country. So No, “Hindutva ideology”shouldn’t concern you.

are you concerned about humanity or Muslims? I don’t think so.

Then,I would assume you can look inwards in where Pakistan there are probably 50 instances way worse than Gujarat riots. How are Hindus doing in Pak? How about Ahmadis? So save me this bs that your heart bleeds for Gujarat. People have listed 100 things way worse than Gujarat that have happened in India, Pakistan and all over the world.

I will tell you what lights that smoke or hurt in the backside. The guy who you thought will be a messiah turned out to be a total clown show while Modi has had more wins than losses in his the last 10 years diplomatically,politically and economy wise.

Probably, that made some Indians brag and become obnoxious and rub it . I can see that causing an issue. Thats the only reason why most of you are hung up on Modi. Even if Imran tuned out to be half-decent probably the toxicity would be way less because there would be a lot more stuff to discuss about Pak.

Well, in the vast buffet of word salads, this one is particularly… perplexing.

All I pointed out was that you seem consistently upset no matter who calls out Hindutva bigotry. Simple enough, right?

Could we, for once, stick to the topic at hand? The conversation is about Hindutva extremism, not a round the world tour of ‘Pakistan this, Pakistan that.’

Sure, I’ll grant you that Pakistan’s in a pretty rough spot, probably its worst in history,but that’s a conversation for another day. For now, let’s focus on Hindutva, just like we would any extremist group, KKK, Islamist extremists, Zio boys or white supremacists. They either bask in the attention because hate is their bread and butter, or they get all riled up because, deep down, they know they’re bigots but can’t quite stomach the truth.

Give it another shot and leave out Pakistan this time, let’s see if you can entertain us all defending India’s most popular extremists group without bringing in Pakistan, shouldn’t be an issue for an educated Indians against non-educated English speaking Pakistanis 😉
 
Well, in the vast buffet of word salads, this one is particularly… perplexing.

All I pointed out was that you seem consistently upset no matter who calls out Hindutva bigotry. Simple enough, right?

Could we, for once, stick to the topic at hand? The conversation is about Hindutva extremism, not a round the world tour of ‘Pakistan this, Pakistan that.’

Sure, I’ll grant you that Pakistan’s in a pretty rough spot, probably its worst in history,but that’s a conversation for another day. For now, let’s focus on Hindutva, just like we would any extremist group, KKK, Islamist extremists, Zio boys or white supremacists. They either bask in the attention because hate is their bread and butter, or they get all riled up because, deep down, they know they’re bigots but can’t quite stomach the truth.

Give it another shot and leave out Pakistan this time, let’s see if you can entertain us all defending India’s most popular extremists group without bringing in Pakistan, shouldn’t be an issue for an educated Indians against non-educated English speaking Pakistanis 😉
Local.dadagiri not translating to global.sense inspite of your best efforts, I see.

Same old tired nonsense we see almost on a daily basis from that corner.
 
Well, in the vast buffet of word salads, this one is particularly… perplexing.

All I pointed out was that you seem consistently upset no matter who calls out Hindutva bigotry. Simple enough, right?

Could we, for once, stick to the topic at hand? The conversation is about Hindutva extremism, not a round the world tour of ‘Pakistan this, Pakistan that.’

Sure, I’ll grant you that Pakistan’s in a pretty rough spot, probably its worst in history,but that’s a conversation for another day. For now, let’s focus on Hindutva, just like we would any extremist group, KKK, Islamist extremists, Zio boys or white supremacists. They either bask in the attention because hate is their bread and butter, or they get all riled up because, deep down, they know they’re bigots but can’t quite stomach the truth.

Give it another shot and leave out Pakistan this time, let’s see if you can entertain us all defending India’s most popular extremists group without bringing in Pakistan, shouldn’t be an issue for an educated Indians against non-educated English speaking Pakistanis 😉

The topic is why do right wing Hindus hate Imran Khan. In my first post I clarified I don’t hate him as a “right-wing Hindu” (even though technically I am more right to the center politically).

As I said you keep accepting Pakistan has problems but you and some of the usual suspects still keep spewing the same old rhetoric on any thread.

I don’t think this thread is about Hindu extremists either. You seem to confuse this with some other thread or maybe that’s the only thing you are capable of posting on every topic like that joke about the kid who wrote the essay on Taj Mahal regardless of the topic 😂.
 
The topic is why do right wing Hindus hate Imran Khan. In my first post I clarified I don’t hate him as a “right-wing Hindu” (even though technically I am more right to the center politically).

As I said you keep accepting Pakistan has problems but you and some of the usual suspects still keep spewing the same old rhetoric on any thread.

I don’t think this thread is about Hindu extremists either. You seem to confuse this with some other thread or maybe that’s the only thing you are capable of posting on every topic like that joke about the kid who wrote the essay on Taj Mahal regardless of the topic 😂.


You brought up Hindutva and somehow tried to downplay its bigoted influence in Indian thought. Naturally, I had to step in and respond.

Now, if Imran Khan had skipped over Modi’s bigotry and just focused on his accomplishments, you’d all be singing his praises like he’s the next Bollywood hero. But, as I mentioned, the real issue here isn’t that Modi’s a bigot—oh no—the problem for you is why Imran Khan dares to keep pointing it out.

One of them clinging to Imran Khan’s little slip of the tongue like it’s the smoking gun to justify their frustration, all while Modi’s entire career is a highlight reel of the most ridiculous religious comments, crafted to sell the fantasy of Hindutva supremacy. But hey, as the saying goes, how dare anyone call a bigot… a bigot.
😁
 
In Pakistan's case, when the coffers are bare, and the same people have been draining the country for close to 40 years, I am afraid corruption is the best and only yardstick. At this point, people will pick a village idiot over these guys, that's the sad truth.

Imran definitely feels like heaven sent, despite all his flaws. Most people here (and elsewhere) who are massive critics of Imran, will probably admit this to themselves in private but if you look at their comments for picking on Imran, it's usually a long the lines of him being a playboy in the past, marrying a woman who had not allegedly completed her iddat, stealing a watch (by the way that case has been dismissed), U turns, etc. They cherry pick some areas to prove his incompetence.

I think you cannot gage his competence in a mere three and a half or four years in the position when the others have completed multiple term of similar length in the office and they are somehow protected and beyond such criticism.

Another bone I have seen Hindu Indians pick with Imran is because they view him as a radical or Taliban sympathizer. I think at best he wanted peace and wanted to negotiate with them rather than continue to fight against them when it is not our war. He sympathized with them, which I feel is wrong on moral grounds but as a politician I can understand why he does not want to antagonize them.

Another reason why especially the Hindutva people don't like him is because he called out Modi and his treatment of Muslims in India. I know he made efforts and tried to promote image that we are trying to take better care of our minorities than India is, and whether that is true or false, is another matter but I feel that really angered Hindutva Indians as well.

You may claim those might be just a handful of people here on the forum, but I have personally seen some Indians in real life as well who have made some bitter remarks about that. Maybe they are just Indian Americans and not resident Indians who feel that way, I cannot speak to that.
A lot of stuff there - some of which I agree with. A lot that I don't.

Anti-corruption crusader is a typical trap that developing country voters tend to fall for. It's always easy to fool folks into believing that they're poor because billions are being stashed in Swiss bank accounts when the real story is so much complicated and difficult to solve.

On competence, it did seem like he was learning as he went along which to be honest is absurd. You can't use your first term as Prime Minister of a quarter of a billion people as training grounds.

As far as calling out Indian treatment of our minorities goes, you're right it was annoying at the time and may have caused a little additional dislike. On the other hand though, I think it reflected his amateur, seat of the pants foreign policy. Indian muslim are none of his business and don't need him looking out for them. They have their own representatives and politicians and can fight their own battles. His statements post the Taliban takeover, tiff with Saudi Arabia on the OIC emergency meeting, controversy over the Donald Lu letter all seem to reflect to me a politician who was learning on the job.

Finally, I would hope this year and going of imprisonment would taught him some lessons. If he does come back to power at some point (which is quite likely in a place like Pakistan), he should be more strategic. Swallow his ego and bile and make deals with likes of the Sharifs and Bhuttos to at least secure some sort of long term democracy for Pakistan winning back ground from the military. Both sides have punished each other in prison. Another pointless crusade is only going to play into the hands of the boys.
 
Nonsense post. Most overseas Pakistani live side by side with Indians and have very good relations with them. Most Indians who are cordial with us actually hate Modi and RSS probably more than Pakistanis do. Comments you are attributing to overseas Pakistanis are actually most often associated with overseas Indians here in the States that I socialize with. Before you ask, this subsection includes mostly Hindus or cultural Hindus, then Muslims.

He is referring to British Pakistanis, most Indians on here have an issue with us because we called them out on their hindutva hatred long before others and it has since been proven twice over. They don't like being called out, but when you elect a Hindutva party on the back of mosque demolitions it would be better just to own it. Don't blame us for it.
 
A lot of stuff there - some of which I agree with. A lot that I don't.
Likewise for me :)
Anti-corruption crusader is a typical trap that developing country voters tend to fall for. It's always easy to fool folks into believing that they're poor because billions are being stashed in Swiss bank accounts when the real story is so much complicated and difficult to solve.
It is not, I think you are over complicating it. The audit trails and proof of corruption, and systemic corruption over decades is very very tangible. If you don't hold them accountable, you are doing a dis service to your country. I totally disagree with your statement. The country is poor because of a number of things, corruption is one of them. Incompetence is another. It would be folly to suggest its a trap, it wasn't and isn't. These people have destroyed all the institutions of the country. Judiciary is their own personal whore. There are serious problems there that need to be tackled. They want a cut and commission into every venture Pakistan takes. It cannot take off economically no matter what measures you put in place unless this system of kickbacks, cuts, commissions is handled. There was a NAB but it was defanged by them. Their old cases dismissed, they and their children are scot free to rule and lord over the country. This simply cannot be allowed.

On competence, it did seem like he was learning as he went along which to be honest is absurd. You can't use your first term as Prime Minister of a quarter of a billion people as training grounds.
Like I said, the bar is set very low, most people would not care. His party got more votes and more majority in the most recent elections so your views there are of course not shared by an overwhelming majority of Pakistan.

As far as calling out Indian treatment of our minorities goes, you're right it was annoying at the time and may have caused a little additional dislike. On the other hand though, I think it reflected his amateur, seat of the pants foreign policy. Indian muslim are none of his business and don't need him looking out for them. They have their own representatives and politicians and can fight their own battles. His statements post the Taliban takeover, tiff with Saudi Arabia on the OIC emergency meeting, controversy over the Donald Lu letter all seem to reflect to me a politician who was learning on the job.

Once again, absolutely nothing wrong with learning on the job and putting in an honest and earnest foot forward in working towards improvement. It should be most welcomed. I strongly disagree with you on this.

Finally, I would hope this year and going of imprisonment would taught him some lessons. If he does come back to power at some point (which is quite likely in a place like Pakistan), he should be more strategic. Swallow his ego and bile and make deals with likes of the Sharifs and Bhuttos to at least secure some sort of long term democracy for Pakistan winning back ground from the military. Both sides have punished each other in prison. Another pointless crusade is only going to play into the hands of the boys.
I think we all know he most likely wont be allowed to come back to power and would probably die in jail or get killed off once released.
Swallowing ego and working with the corrupt people is not the answer. It is a cheap cop out. It should not be allowed. If by chance it does happen, he will lose all support.

Apart from the the corrupt leaders that need to be put away, there are massive reforms needed to get rid of the military establishment and set up proper democracy in Pakistan. This cannot be done until these people are available at the establishment's beck and call to do their bidding and be their finger puppets. Due to this fact it is even more important to get rid of them.


Some parting notes: Indians typically wont understand this particular dynamic within Pakistan, and I am not holding this against them to be honest. But the people are tired of corruption, lies and treachery and the manipulation of democracy by the establishment. I think they are done. They are not showing the will and the strength to fight it off right now but slowly and slowly its all building up. Imran may have not been effective in other areas but what he has done in flying colors is expose it all to everyone. Yes, he was an establishment man, he was assisted by them but it did not take too long for him to see how bad things were and how the Bajwa and Co tried to manipulate him to do their bidding. He did initially swallow his ego but it got to a point where he could not allow it to continue and that's when they got rid of him.

Now its all out in the open and the eyes are opened for the first time. People are not actually talking about and admitting for the first time that injustice was done to the East Pakistanis and the Urdu speaking community in Karachi and even Balochis.
They were all initially labelled traitors and scum, blah blah.

This is the biggest fire that has been lit under them and Imran is responsible for it.
 
Likewise for me :)

It is not, I think you are over complicating it. The audit trails and proof of corruption, and systemic corruption over decades is very very tangible. If you don't hold them accountable, you are doing a dis service to your country. I totally disagree with your statement. The country is poor because of a number of things, corruption is one of them. Incompetence is another. It would be folly to suggest its a trap, it wasn't and isn't. These people have destroyed all the institutions of the country. Judiciary is their own personal whore. There are serious problems there that need to be tackled. They want a cut and commission into every venture Pakistan takes. It cannot take off economically no matter what measures you put in place unless this system of kickbacks, cuts, commissions is handled. There was a NAB but it was defanged by them. Their old cases dismissed, they and their children are scot free to rule and lord over the country. This simply cannot be allowed.


Like I said, the bar is set very low, most people would not care. His party got more votes and more majority in the most recent elections so your views there are of course not shared by an overwhelming majority of Pakistan.



Once again, absolutely nothing wrong with learning on the job and putting in an honest and earnest foot forward in working towards improvement. It should be most welcomed. I strongly disagree with you on this.


I think we all know he most likely wont be allowed to come back to power and would probably die in jail or get killed off once released.
Swallowing ego and working with the corrupt people is not the answer. It is a cheap cop out. It should not be allowed. If by chance it does happen, he will lose all support.

Apart from the the corrupt leaders that need to be put away, there are massive reforms needed to get rid of the military establishment and set up proper democracy in Pakistan. This cannot be done until these people are available at the establishment's beck and call to do their bidding and be their finger puppets. Due to this fact it is even more important to get rid of them.


Some parting notes: Indians typically wont understand this particular dynamic within Pakistan, and I am not holding this against them to be honest. But the people are tired of corruption, lies and treachery and the manipulation of democracy by the establishment. I think they are done. They are not showing the will and the strength to fight it off right now but slowly and slowly its all building up. Imran may have not been effective in other areas but what he has done in flying colors is expose it all to everyone. Yes, he was an establishment man, he was assisted by them but it did not take too long for him to see how bad things were and how the Bajwa and Co tried to manipulate him to do their bidding. He did initially swallow his ego but it got to a point where he could not allow it to continue and that's when they got rid of him.

Now its all out in the open and the eyes are opened for the first time. People are not actually talking about and admitting for the first time that injustice was done to the East Pakistanis and the Urdu speaking community in Karachi and even Balochis.
They were all initially labelled traitors and scum, blah blah.

This is the biggest fire that has been lit under them and Imran is responsible for it.
I'm surprised a guy like you is so idealist. While i encourage this idealism among my younger nieces and nephews, I think the likes of us have to be more pragmatic.

While nothing you say is incorrect, the kind of wholesale change you're envisaging is so rare as to be almost impossible. No one man, even if you got the combined rebirth of Lincoln, Ataturk and Lee Kuan Yew is capable of taking on a system 75 years in the making, entrenched into every element of society and bringing in the fundamental change you're dreaming of. It would take a revolution and the unintended consequences in terms of chaos and instability would be so painful as to potentially make the cure worse than the disease. And I assure you, Imran is no Ataturk.

What works better in the real world and is usually more guaranteed to stick is steady incremental change. Get all the political parties - even the corrupt ones together, build a Democratic covenant - i.e. all parties agree to support the winners of a free and fair election and in return all past sins are forgiven. Take Indonesia for a successful example and how they got past decades under dictatorship. You'll try to bring up the example of Sri Lanka and Bangladesh for successful rebellion but the issues over there weren't so deep rooted - military rule under Hasina/Rajapaksa was still immature. Even then it took a lot of chaos and pain for a government change.
 
I'm surprised a guy like you is so idealist. While i encourage this idealism among my younger nieces and nephews, I think the likes of us have to be more pragmatic.

While nothing you say is incorrect, the kind of wholesale change you're envisaging is so rare as to be almost impossible. No one man, even if you got the combined rebirth of Lincoln, Ataturk and Lee Kuan Yew is capable of taking on a system 75 years in the making, entrenched into every element of society and bringing in the fundamental change you're dreaming of. It would take a revolution and the unintended consequences in terms of chaos and instability would be so painful as to potentially make the cure worse than the disease. And I assure you, Imran is no Ataturk.

What works better in the real world and is usually more guaranteed to stick is steady incremental change. Get all the political parties - even the corrupt ones together, build a Democratic covenant - i.e. all parties agree to support the winners of a free and fair election and in return all past sins are forgiven. Take Indonesia for a successful example and how they got past decades under dictatorship. You'll try to bring up the example of Sri Lanka and Bangladesh for successful rebellion but the issues over there weren't so deep rooted - military rule under Hasina/Rajapaksa was still immature. Even then it took a lot of chaos and pain for a government change.



Once again, as an Indian you will not understand the complexity involved in a gradual change in systemic corruption and control of Pakistan. I am not surprised at your views because as an Indian, you are accustomed to working in a democratic landscape which is extremely wide, diverse, dynamic and has multiple moving parts. Compromise and realpolitik is the need there. Using such tools even a tool like Modi can reign supreme, I get it.

But this doesn't work in Pakistan for reasons I could write a whole book on. So yes, I may seem like a starry eyed young kid with delusions of idealism, but the fact is that this system will need a massive shock. Its FUBARed as they say and beyond redemption. You cannot slowly and gradually fix it. It needs to be torn down and rebuilt.

So yes, it does require a revolution. You may think Imran is not capable of it, time will tell. He has already sown massive seeds of the revolution already. The truth is the real change and revolution comes from the people themselves, the leader just ignites the fire. Imran has done that. The rest is now up to the people. They need to wake up.

The system of controls against a gradual and small scale course correction that you seem to be advocating in Pakistan is very very very strong. It was put in place by the US, backed by the military establishment and the corrupt Elites. They have everyone and everything in their pockets, that includes the three main branches of government. There is no independence there and the controls that are implemented in a democracy to work with these branches do not exist in Pakistan.

In a nutshell, Imran in his lifetime wont be able to fix it, there is no way. Nobody can. I think it will require a sustained and concentrated effort over generations to fix it. Pakistan does not have the luxury of time, the wherewithal, and honest people who can bring about something of that magnitude.

So the alternative is either to keep trudging along the current slow death path or bring about wholesale changes. The only other scenario that I can think of which may alleviate some of these challenges in a more forgiving manner is if the military leadership somehow grow morality. The next COAS develops a crisis of conscience and decides "enough is enough, I am not going to mess with the will of the people or personal gains" and lets democracy take its due course. That would be a miracle by the way.
 
Once again, as an Indian you will not understand the complexity involved in a gradual change in systemic corruption and control of Pakistan. I am not surprised at your views because as an Indian, you are accustomed to working in a democratic landscape which is extremely wide, diverse, dynamic and has multiple moving parts. Compromise and realpolitik is the need there. Using such tools even a tool like Modi can reign supreme, I get it.

But this doesn't work in Pakistan for reasons I could write a whole book on. So yes, I may seem like a starry eyed young kid with delusions of idealism, but the fact is that this system will need a massive shock. Its FUBARed as they say and beyond redemption. You cannot slowly and gradually fix it. It needs to be torn down and rebuilt.

So yes, it does require a revolution. You may think Imran is not capable of it, time will tell. He has already sown massive seeds of the revolution already. The truth is the real change and revolution comes from the people themselves, the leader just ignites the fire. Imran has done that. The rest is now up to the people. They need to wake up.

The system of controls against a gradual and small scale course correction that you seem to be advocating in Pakistan is very very very strong. It was put in place by the US, backed by the military establishment and the corrupt Elites. They have everyone and everything in their pockets, that includes the three main branches of government. There is no independence there and the controls that are implemented in a democracy to work with these branches do not exist in Pakistan.

In a nutshell, Imran in his lifetime wont be able to fix it, there is no way. Nobody can. I think it will require a sustained and concentrated effort over generations to fix it. Pakistan does not have the luxury of time, the wherewithal, and honest people who can bring about something of that magnitude.

So the alternative is either to keep trudging along the current slow death path or bring about wholesale changes. The only other scenario that I can think of which may alleviate some of these challenges in a more forgiving manner is if the military leadership somehow grow morality. The next COAS develops a crisis of conscience and decides "enough is enough, I am not going to mess with the will of the people or personal gains" and lets democracy take its due course. That would be a miracle by the way.
Fair enough...I'll defer to your more specific knowledge if you'll allow me my skepticism.

I still believe a revolution is a bad way to bring in lasting change and even if it was, a neophyte politician like Imran Khan who doesn't seem to have the 'cunning' gene is the wrong person to lead it. The few who've made revolutions against long established systems work - Stalin, Mao also brought unimaginable suffering to the people. The price is immense.

I would say Pakistan is in a bad place but not in such a terrible state as to have to pay such a price. The next few years are going to be a bit of goldilocks period - dropping interest rates, companies looking to derisk manufacturing out of China, controlled oil prices (assuming Israel-Iran doesn't escalate into a full-scale war), global growth.

Pakistan is now under a long term IMF program with at least temporarily controlled current account deficits and will reap a few benefits
- Dropping interest rates will reduce the debt repayment burdens
- Markets may be willing to lend to Pakistan again
- Some of the key reforms e.g tax compliance could potentially go through by just blaming IMF for them

If Pakistan could use this period to invest in the right places - primary education, export infrastructure - slow and steady reform could work. Will try your and many young Pakistani's patience I know but I would posit political reform usually follows economic growth. Everybody - even the military and corrupt politicians get a smaller share of a bigger pie unlike the big share of the small pie currently.
 
Fair enough...I'll defer to your more specific knowledge if you'll allow me my skepticism.

I still believe a revolution is a bad way to bring in lasting change and even if it was, a neophyte politician like Imran Khan who doesn't seem to have the 'cunning' gene is the wrong person to lead it. The few who've made revolutions against long established systems work - Stalin, Mao also brought unimaginable suffering to the people. The price is immense.

I would say Pakistan is in a bad place but not in such a terrible state as to have to pay such a price. The next few years are going to be a bit of goldilocks period - dropping interest rates, companies looking to derisk manufacturing out of China, controlled oil prices (assuming Israel-Iran doesn't escalate into a full-scale war), global growth.

Pakistan is now under a long term IMF program with at least temporarily controlled current account deficits and will reap a few benefits
- Dropping interest rates will reduce the debt repayment burdens
- Markets may be willing to lend to Pakistan again
- Some of the key reforms e.g tax compliance could potentially go through by just blaming IMF for them

If Pakistan could use this period to invest in the right places - primary education, export infrastructure - slow and steady reform could work. Will try your and many young Pakistani's patience I know but I would posit political reform usually follows economic growth. Everybody - even the military and corrupt politicians get a smaller share of a bigger pie unlike the big share of the small pie currently.
Pakistan does not and if so rarely, invests in the right areas of education, developing exports, etc.

Go back and look at the foreign reserves of Pakistan in the 80s and compare them with yours. We were way ahead. The funding we received from the US during the Soviet war and later during the "war on terror" if that had been used correctly would have resulted in long term benefits for the country. but those funds are used to provide perks to the elites (military personnel, politicians) exuberant over expenditure, waste, perks for cronies, overstaffing, rozi roti for their people for doing nothing (you wont believe this but you will find a massive list of people getting paid by the state for doing practically nothing, sitting at home drawing salaries), business loans to the elites (relatives of politicians), the most recent scandal is the IPPs (INDEPEDENT POWER PRODUCERS) These are all owned by the politicians themselves. they used the govt funds to set up their own companies supposed to help us with the challenge of the high power demand in the country. They basically turned it into a mafia, high rates, power cuts, etc. the industry is shut down because of them. Basically any and all large scale domestic business that is set up using the govt funds involved kickbacks, commissions, etc. Nothing is being invested properly, and we are building zero exports. There is no vision there either.


You see this is the tip of the iceberg. Thats how we have got to this point. Had those funds been used honestly and smartly for national benefit we would not be here. But as things stand, over the last 40 years, the so called investment has only resulted in profits going to the pockets of the politicians who are also businessmen or retirement funds of the military generals and all that money ends up leaving the country and going abroad. The Panama leaks, etc are evidence of that. All the retired COASs are living it large overseas.


Even the education system has become a joke. It has turned into big business. there are not decent state institutions, very few. If you want to send your kids to a decent school, you have to go to these big business owned schools who sell you UK/US education. Its only for the rich and their kids. Middle class folks can only afford mediocre education. The poor children have schools where teachers can barely name the provinces of the country. That's how bad that situation has become.


Every single area you have identified, the corrupt Elites have already sighted it, targeted it and profited from it. How do you expect progress then without proper and permanent excision of this cancer?
 
Pakistan does not and if so rarely, invests in the right areas of education, developing exports, etc.

Go back and look at the foreign reserves of Pakistan in the 80s and compare them with yours. We were way ahead. The funding we received from the US during the Soviet war and later during the "war on terror" if that had been used correctly would have resulted in long term benefits for the country. but those funds are used to provide perks to the elites (military personnel, politicians) exuberant over expenditure, waste, perks for cronies, overstaffing, rozi roti for their people for doing nothing (you wont believe this but you will find a massive list of people getting paid by the state for doing practically nothing, sitting at home drawing salaries), business loans to the elites (relatives of politicians), the most recent scandal is the IPPs (INDEPEDENT POWER PRODUCERS) These are all owned by the politicians themselves. they used the govt funds to set up their own companies supposed to help us with the challenge of the high power demand in the country. They basically turned it into a mafia, high rates, power cuts, etc. the industry is shut down because of them. Basically any and all large scale domestic business that is set up using the govt funds involved kickbacks, commissions, etc. Nothing is being invested properly, and we are building zero exports. There is no vision there either.


You see this is the tip of the iceberg. Thats how we have got to this point. Had those funds been used honestly and smartly for national benefit we would not be here. But as things stand, over the last 40 years, the so called investment has only resulted in profits going to the pockets of the politicians who are also businessmen or retirement funds of the military generals and all that money ends up leaving the country and going abroad. The Panama leaks, etc are evidence of that. All the retired COASs are living it large overseas.


Even the education system has become a joke. It has turned into big business. there are not decent state institutions, very few. If you want to send your kids to a decent school, you have to go to these big business owned schools who sell you UK/US education. Its only for the rich and their kids. Middle class folks can only afford mediocre education. The poor children have schools where teachers can barely name the provinces of the country. That's how bad that situation has become.


Every single area you have identified, the corrupt Elites have already sighted it, targeted it and profited from it. How do you expect progress then without proper and permanent excision of this cancer?
Oh I agree Pakistan is poorly managed.

Just as an example - I just checked and petrol prices in Pakistan are about 40% lower in dollar terms today than in India though we both import crude and India's able to buy cheaper. The politicians in charge of Pakistan needed to appease the masses and dropped the prices as soon as international oil prices fell while India chose to keep taxes high and bank the money for capital investments (which have a much higher long term economic impact) rather than just offer short term relief.

In the end, Pakistan needs competence and foresight rather than a revolution which won't really solve any of the fundamental issues.

If I had to outline a best case scenario, I would suggest an Army chief who understood their own prosperity lay in Pakistan's growth. He would be willing to make some short term sacrifices to allow technocrats to take the right decisions over the next few years which in the long run would yield the aforementioned smaller slice in a bigger pie. Some of those could be backing the technocrats in imposing a property tax, removing subsidies to leaching industries like Sugar. Maybe Asim Munir is the man...maybe not. There is definitely a window of opportunity in the next few years.

I still believe democracy is the best system in the long run but China, Vietnam etc. have shown a success model where you can ruthlessly suppress political dissent and the will of the people but drive economic growth to make up the difference and keep things going for a long long time.
 
Pakistan needs to have an Army not the other way round. Solve this enigma, 50% of Pakistan's issues are resolved in no time and rest will follow. IK thought he could do that, but he overestimated his prowess. He was the best golden chance for Pakistan but its gone now.
 
Oh I agree Pakistan is poorly managed.

Just as an example - I just checked and petrol prices in Pakistan are about 40% lower in dollar terms today than in India though we both import crude and India's able to buy cheaper. The politicians in charge of Pakistan needed to appease the masses and dropped the prices as soon as international oil prices fell while India chose to keep taxes high and bank the money for capital investments (which have a much higher long term economic impact) rather than just offer short term relief.

In the end, Pakistan needs competence and foresight rather than a revolution which won't really solve any of the fundamental issues.

If I had to outline a best case scenario, I would suggest an Army chief who understood their own prosperity lay in Pakistan's growth. He would be willing to make some short term sacrifices to allow technocrats to take the right decisions over the next few years which in the long run would yield the aforementioned smaller slice in a bigger pie. Some of those could be backing the technocrats in imposing a property tax, removing subsidies to leaching industries like Sugar. Maybe Asim Munir is the man...maybe not. There is definitely a window of opportunity in the next few years.

I still believe democracy is the best system in the long run but China, Vietnam etc. have shown a success model where you can ruthlessly suppress political dissent and the will of the people but drive economic growth to make up the difference and keep things going for a long long time.

I know its a co-incidence but those are exactly the talking points of the anti-Imran, pro PDM people in Pakistan. The PDM leadership always falls back to this favorite stance, ne Meri na Teri. let the army rule and put us in the chair as dummies and we will let the technocrats do all the work. the difference is they continue to skim off where they can and the technocrats technically don't have much control to freely make their policies. It works only if the military leader is honest, imposes full martial law and let the technocrats do their job and simply monitors the progress. We all thought that's what Mushy was by the way and in some ways he was, except for the Kargil disaster and some other domestic crap he stirred up in his later years.

If you look at my last point in post #144, I realized this could be one of the paths forward but unfortunately the COAS appointment never happens without the consent of the US so its a deathly loop. They want their yes man in the chair who does not think independently but at the same time doesn't outwardly pose as a dictator because that's not a good look for the US. They want the current system where the COAS uses the "electables", and they use the COAS to control the country.
And when the electables get involved, you cannot put in the technocrats.

You can do that only in case of full military control.

Its a very deathly loop of struggle Pakistan is stuck in. Very tough to get out of this rut. Your suggestions and ideas would look great on paper but they don't match the ground realities.
 
Pakistan needs to have an Army not the other way round. Solve this enigma, 50% of Pakistan's issues are resolved in no time and rest will follow. IK thought he could do that, but he overestimated his prowess. He was the best golden chance for Pakistan but its gone now.
I cant believe I am saying this but I agree with this guy.
 
On the IK topic here is how the Indian perspective looks-

IK is in jail on the accusation of a non-Islamic marriage and picking up a watch from the treasury

I personally think those are ridiculous charges and probably set up by political rivals.

Now either ways from across the border it looks extremely absurd and funny. Since there is no emotional attachment it translates to meme and comedy material.

At least someone being in jail for sedition, terrorism etc fake or true makes sense and sounds more serious.

Even then speaking for myself, I treat is as none of my business until some back-hurt guy keeps drawing an equivalence with Indian government which the way it is handling things and running administration is a borderline role model state for all our neighbors.

That’s my conclusive take on this topic
 
Pakistan needs to have an Army not the other way round. Solve this enigma, 50% of Pakistan's issues are resolved in no time and rest will follow. IK thought he could do that, but he overestimated his prowess. He was the best golden chance for Pakistan but its gone now.

I cant believe I am saying this but I agree with this guy.
I don't think anyone's denying that's the long term solution. Separate the State, military and the mosque. Let them all remain in their own spheres. Even authoritarian countries who may not agree with democracy like China and Russia realise this.

In the short to medium term though, Pakistan needs temporary fixes. A revolution without addressing the underlying problems doesn't stick. See Egypt for an illustration - there was so much optimism in the Arab spring but they're back to where they started.

Human development and economics come first, then political fixes. Trying a political awakening and revolution without building a foundation only lays fertile ground for the next populist dictator - usually military.
 
I don't think anyone's denying that's the long term solution. Separate the State, military and the mosque. Let them all remain in their own spheres. Even authoritarian countries who may not agree with democracy like China and Russia realise this.

In the short to medium term though, Pakistan needs temporary fixes. A revolution without addressing the underlying problems doesn't stick. See Egypt for an illustration - there was so much optimism in the Arab spring but they're back to where they started.

Human development and economics come first, then political fixes. Trying a political awakening and revolution without building a foundation only lays fertile ground for the next populist dictator - usually military.
Arab spring was not affected by the people themselves. It was external manipulation.
 
Whats your take on BD change? you buy the student uprising story?
I am afraid I am not well informed on that one. During the Arab spring, I was really keeping myself updated on stuff and eventually reached the conclusion it was initiated by the Obama admin trying to spread democracy in the middle east and ending up making a mess of it.

I just have not looked into BD situation with enough attention. I will say though that some close acquaintances of BD origin in the States insist this was completely domestically motivated without any foreign factors involved.
 
He is referring to British Pakistanis, most Indians on here have an issue with us because we called them out on their hindutva hatred long before others and it has since been proven twice over. They don't like being called out, but when you elect a Hindutva party on the back of mosque demolitions it would be better just to own it. Don't blame us for it.
Britistani's hatred for india long predates "hindutva"
 
I am afraid I am not well informed on that one. During the Arab spring, I was really keeping myself updated on stuff and eventually reached the conclusion it was initiated by the Obama admin trying to spread democracy in the middle east and ending up making a mess of it.

I just have not looked into BD situation with enough attention. I will say though that some close acquaintances of BD origin in the States insist this was completely domestically motivated without any foreign factors involved.
is it student driven or r they a puppet BD establishment?

BD has a huge army which is disproportionate to its security needs and they play a role similar to Pak establishment.

like Pak establishment, they seem to be very active in internal affairs
 
Arab spring was not affected by the people themselves. It was external manipulation.
Maybe though it seems unlikely in Egypt at least. The subsequent elections resulted in Mohammed Morsi coming to power which doesn't seem like something any major power would want. It didn't last anyway and they backslid into a quasi-military dictatorship under Sisi.

Which is what would happen in Pakistan if it went direct to a regime change revolution skipping all the buildup that makes the change sustainable.
 
is it student driven or r they a puppet BD establishment?

BD has a huge army which is disproportionate to its security needs and they play a role similar to Pak establishment.

like Pak establishment, they seem to be very active in internal affairs
So who do you think is the puppeteer in this puppet establishment?
 
Back
Top