sharon javed
Debutant
- Joined
- May 1, 2017
- Runs
- 73
Who is better?

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No matter how many statistics someone throws at my face, I will not take Younis over MoYo in any format. Statistically speaking, all of the records that Younis now holds would have been MoYo's had he not wasted 5-6 years from 2007 onwards. He should have been a regular till 2013-14, but only played sporadically due to reasons that go beyond the scope of this thread.
Immaculate cover drive.
I don't know what it is, even the Pakistani greats, simply seem to never live up to their potential except for maybe the bowlers. As great as Yousuf was, I truly believe he could have been more.
No matter how many statistics someone throws at my face, I will not take Younis over MoYo in any format. Statistically speaking, all of the records that Younis now holds would have been MoYo's had he not wasted 5-6 years from 2007 onwards. He should have been a regular till 2013-14, but only played sporadically due to reasons that go beyond the scope of this thread.
Yousuf was a dud outside Asia except England.
But still was way bettee against pace than Younis. Yousuf is ahead.
Immaculate cover drive.
I don't know what it is, even the Pakistani greats, simply seem to never live up to their potential except for maybe the bowlers. As great as Yousuf was, I truly believe he could have been more.
He couldnt do that because He had a weird fitness issue. His mucles were always very stiff. That is why despite being natural strokemaker, he used to take lot of time to adjust in the beginning of his innings. Watch his interview with wasim akram
Weird fitness issue
The issue was he had no athletic ability![]()
I think there is already a thread on this.
For me Yousuf > Younis in tests. Unpopular opinion here i know.
Test + odis combined Yousuf >> Younis
Not sure how you can claim he way better against pace.
Yousuf averaged 31 in Australia and 26 in South Africa. Younis averages 50 in Australia and 32 in South Africa.
Younis outperformed Yousuf in the 2004-05 Australia tour against McGrath, Gillespie and Kasprowicz. He was our highest scorer in that horrible Perth Test match.
He was our highest scorer on a bouncy pitch at Old Trafford against Steve Harmison in 2006 whilst Yousuf went missing.
Yousuf is a nothing cricketer. Not even fit to tie Younis khan's boots.
Tests or odis,he is what Amla is to odis and hence, has no legacy as a cricketer.
Its a shame that guys who moan about match winning ability of a player or performing in tough conditions rate a guy like Yousuf who also is a FTB, terrible leader and terrible human being with a lack of knowledge of what and how to speak and where.
Comparing Yousuf with Younis is like comparing Mahela with Sanga.
I do not even have to dig into their stats. Yousuf was done as a batsman in 2009. Managed just 1 century in his last 7 test series in 17 tests! In his last 3 test series in NZ, Australia, and England, he did not manage to score a single century in 8 tests.
With his poor fitness and abysmal work ethics, he was not going to magically start piling on runs. Both Sanga and Younis were exceptional cases, two cricketers with terrific fitness. No wonder, they did so well in the later stages of their careers.
In those 17 tests Yousaf scored plenty of 50's, 90's and one 90 plus runs he came in at no 3 vs NZ bowlers on a green top. He may not have had centuries but he was not done as a batsman. Waqar used his youngster crusade and ruined Yousaf's career
50s are scored by batsmen like Shane Watson in tests and not Ricky Ponting. No matter how you look at it, 1 century in 17 tests is an extremely poor record for a #4 batsman.
In NZ, Australia, and England, he did not manage to score a single century. 40 years old Younis played one great inning each in Australia and England.
Yousuf was the most spineless 50+ averaging batsman I have ever watched. Even Ijazz Ahmed, a far inferior batsman, has showed more guts.
No matter how many statistics someone throws at my face, I will not take Younis over MoYo in any format. Statistically speaking, all of the records that Younis now holds would have been MoYo's had he not wasted 5-6 years from 2007 onwards. He should have been a regular till 2013-14, but only played sporadically due to reasons that go beyond the scope of this thread.
(off-topic)
A curse for Pakistani cricketers.
Imran Khan: Lost years of his prime to injury (150-250 wickets)
Wasim Akram: Diabetes and lot of dropped dollies
Waqar: Lost his absolute prime to back injury
Shoaib: Whole career was injuries
Asif: Breaks my heart
Amir: He is back and hopefully will win us many series Insha'Allah
Here is something without statistics.
Moyo was one of the biggest bottlers we ever had - great on piling on the soft runs but when the pressure he was on - he was the first to dissapear (even in Asian conditions).
YK has no such issues.
Younis Khan did not have a single century in Australia prior to his final series. Yousaf has a century against Mcgrath, Gillespie, Kasprowicz and Warne. You can't be a 50 plus averaging batsman and a spineless batsman at the same time. The same Yousaf has centuries against Walsh and Ambrose as well
And in the final England Series Yousaf played in, it was the toughest batting conditions that a Pakistani side ever experienced, even then Yousaf when he got his opportunity scored a 50 in tough batting conditions on his first innings of the series.
Yousuf was a dud outside Asia except England.
But still was way bettee against pace than Younis. Yousuf is ahead.
Are you kidding me? I can list many occasions b/w 2010 and 2017 when YK went missing when the pressure was on and when he being the senior most batsman in the team went missing.
Runs against Ambrose, Walsh, Mcgrath, Gillespie, Kasprowicz, Warne, Harmison, Hoggard are hardly what you consider soft.
When someone averages 35 in matches won, no further proof is needed to assert how spineless they were.
Ijazz has 3 centuries in Australia, I guess he was then better than both Younis and Yousuf.
Yes every player will go missing from time to time when the pressure is on but YK more than often turned up for the party.
From his century against SAF on a day 5 pitch in 2010 to his hundred against SAF at Newlands to his 171 vs SL at Pakellele and his double hundred at the Oval when the series was on the line. The list is pretty good.
Younis Khan did not have a single century in Australia prior to his final series. Yousaf has a century against Mcgrath, Gillespie, Kasprowicz and Warne. You can't be a 50 plus averaging batsman and a spineless batsman at the same time. The same Yousaf has centuries against Walsh and Ambrose as well
And in the final England Series Yousaf played in, it was the toughest batting conditions that a Pakistani side ever experienced, even then Yousaf when he got his opportunity scored a 50 in tough batting conditions on his first innings of the series.
Yousuf is arguably the greatest ever Pakistani batsman.
Bhaijaan,
Javed Miandad
Inzamam-ul-haq
Younis Khan
Zaheer Abbas
Saeed Anwar
Misbah-ul-haq
Hanif Mohammad
That's 7 names.
And all of them respectfully stand behind Mohammad Yousuf.
It is sad that MoYo did not fulfil his true potential. By far the greatest Pakistani batting talent and arguably their best ever.
^
No they weren’t.
Tests or ODIs, MoYo was a far greater batsmen than all of them.