Electron
ODI Debutant
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2013
- Runs
- 10,600
Our two in form batsman running themselves out. Oh I hate you Waleed. I blame you and only you.
Blame the top order. You were out of the game even before Waleed bhai came in.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Our two in form batsman running themselves out. Oh I hate you Waleed. I blame you and only you.
Out again !!
I am in love with the cround in melbourne..amazing ...
Indian crowds are necessary to make any tournament lively.
These mauka ads are working well for India![]()
Too true. We're an all rounder short. Good top 6 and good 4 bowlers. But no team can win a world cup with 10 men only. Parnell and Behardien have been abominations.
It is not "Rediculous" because Amla averages more away than at home. Not that this is about him. I'm talking about the entire South African side and the fact that chasing a 300 total today would be very difficult for any team.
300 chase is still a tough proposition. Batting first is the way to go in this WC, even if the initial conditions are bowling friendly.
McLaren isn't going to be the saviour either. Just pick Roussow and back Duminy to bowl 10.
They simplay never chase , its not just today . Stop giving excuses . Even SAF fans would admit that theie team arent good chasing .
you guys where giving excuses for the pitch being falt when India batted & now excuses for this pitch being diffuclt to bat on when chasing ? Wow just wow
Firstly, India is playing good ODI cricket (which doesn't require any attacking bowling).
But this match, like both of Pakistan's and England's so far, highlights everything that is wrong with modern ODI cricket.
When scores were lower you often found games went down to the wire, and even when they didn't they were rarely decided until the last 5-10 overs.
But the recurrent pattern between non-minnow nations at this World Cup goes like this:
TEAM A SCORES 300+
TEAM B IS CERTAIN TO LOSE WITH 25 OVERS LEFT TO BAT
Few things are more boring than that formula.
India's fielding is right up there. Their out-fielding is simply astonishing. Quickly cover the ground, stay low, quick release and strong accurate throws. And these are the pacers who are usually weak links in teams.
Too true. We're an all rounder short. Good top 6 and good 4 bowlers. But no team can win a world cup with 10 men only. Parnell and Behardien have been abominations.
Yes, they are better at setting a score, that is established. I am only talking about this specific WC and saying that chasing 300+ is going to be difficult for any team. No team has had a comfortable chase in this WC so far and we'll see how India do as the tournament progresses. For now, don't sweat it.
Indian Crowd + MCC = EPIC Atmosphere.![]()
Firstly, India is playing good ODI cricket (which doesn't require any attacking bowling).
But this match, like both of Pakistan's and England's so far, highlights everything that is wrong with modern ODI cricket.
When scores were lower you often found games went down to the wire, and even when they didn't they were rarely decided until the last 5-10 overs.
But the recurrent pattern between non-minnow nations at this World Cup goes like this:
TEAM A SCORES 300+
TEAM B IS CERTAIN TO LOSE WITH 25 OVERS LEFT TO BAT
Few things are more boring than that formula.
Ireland say hello.
Pakistan might have a chance against SA, 157/8 lol![]()
Firstly, India is playing good ODI cricket (which doesn't require any attacking bowling).
But this match, like both of Pakistan's and England's so far, highlights everything that is wrong with modern ODI cricket.
When scores were lower you often found games went down to the wire, and even when they didn't they were rarely decided until the last 5-10 overs.
But the recurrent pattern between non-minnow nations at this World Cup goes like this:
TEAM A SCORES 300+
TEAM B IS CERTAIN TO LOSE WITH 25 OVERS LEFT TO BAT
Few things are more boring than that formula.
Pakistan doesn't have the bowling to get South Africa 157-8..
We would need a big fluke.
Yes, they are better at setting a score, that is established. I am only talking about this specific WC and saying that chasing 300+ is going to be difficult for any team. No team has had a comfortable chase in this WC so far and we'll see how India do as the tournament progresses. For now, don't sweat it.
Ireland say hello.
You have to play very well to chase 300. If you are not good enough on the day you will not chase it. Even in India, someone has to score big under scoreboard pressure to chase down 300.
PAK fans should feel good about their team now. At least youur team reached 224 chasing. SA look like they have already given up.
Everyone is writting India off. But, why do I get the feeling that India are gonna trash ball-tamperers ?
India has a decent chance of retaining the World Cup in these conditions.
I'm not sure that too many people who aren't Indian or Sri Lankan would tune into watch these depressing batfests, but they are very good in these conditions.
India has a decent chance of retaining the World Cup in these conditions.
I'm not sure that too many people who aren't Indian or Sri Lankan would tune into watch these depressing batfests, but they are very good in these conditions.
India has a decent chance of retaining the World Cup in these conditions.
I'm not sure that too many people who aren't Indian or Sri Lankan would tune into watch these depressing batfests, but they are very good in these conditions.
Yes. Choke on! Staffers favourites my.. .
The wonderful American writer Mike Marquesee wrote the definitive history of the 1996 World Cup in the subcontinent, and called it "War Minus the Fighting".
He is lucky that he lost his brave battle with cancer before this World Cup.
But he could have written the definitive book on it. And called it:
"Cricket Minus The Bowling".
Or perhaps other teams are not good enough? Can you be appreciative of cricket that India plays sometimes or is negativity so integral in you?
I do applaud India at being really good at this form of cricket on flat wickets.
I just hate cricket in which the bowlers can't bowl. Which is why I hated Paksitan's recent Test wins over Australia and New Zealand, on wickets on which no-one ever got caught in the slips or by the keeper. Sport isn't sport when you take the sport out of it.
I do applaud India at being really good at this form of cricket on flat wickets.
I just hate cricket in which the bowlers can't bowl. Which is why I hated Paksitan's recent Test wins over Australia and New Zealand, on wickets on which no-one ever got caught in the slips or by the keeper. Sport isn't sport when you take the sport out of it.
I do applaud India at being really good at this form of cricket on flat wickets.
I just hate cricket in which the bowlers can't bowl. Which is why I hated Paksitan's recent Test wins over Australia and New Zealand, on wickets on which no-one ever got caught in the slips or by the keeper. Sport isn't sport when you take the sport out of it.