What's new

Ashwin, Jadeja, or Kuldeep - Which spinner do India start with for the Tests outside Asia?

Hasan123

Test Star
Joined
Mar 25, 2016
Runs
38,432
India play South Africa later on this year and tour England next year. They will either play 3/4 pacers meaning there will only be space for at least one spinner. Question is who do India go for out of Jadeja, Ashwin, and Kuldeep? Ashwin and Jadeja have struggled outside of Asia for the most part, while Kuldeep is untried but will bring something different to the table.

So who would you go for? And if it the conditions required 2 spinners, who would you select?

Discuss......
 
India will likely go with the same combo as the last test, possibly a couple of changes with Vijay coming in for Dhawan & Kumar for Umesh. If it;s a really grassy track then Aswhin gets my vote & Umesh or Ishant come in for Jadeja, India would like to have all three A/R in the squad when they're fit.
 
Kuldeep having good time but won't be long to see him getting smacked just like ashwin & jadeja.Infact all 3 are useless but if i have to pick one kuldeep is better for all conditions but his record has been bad in first class and i guess better teams will pick him easily on overseas tour.
 
Ashwin has improved a lot in the last 2 years. He should be the first choice spinner.
 
Shami
Yadav
Pandya

Above 3 are a must irrespective of conditions.

Th fight is between BK/Ashwin/Jaddu/Kuldeep for the remaining 2 slots.

Choose BK if there is some grass or If there is some swing and seam movement expected.

If it is a total flat wicket like we saw last time in Aus and SA, choose Jaddu and Kuldeep.

This pretty much leaves out Ashwin. He is a huge liability in the field when he is not taking wickets. I know he can bat in Tests. But we have Pandya and Jaddu who can score 50runs between them when needed.
 
Shami
Yadav
Bhuvi
Pandya
Ashwin

It should be the first pick in those conditions.

If there is something for spinners which we see in England and SA, then Jadeja comes in place of one of the pacer.
 
Last edited:
Shami
Yadav
Bhuvi
Pandya
Ashwin

It should be the first pick in those conditions.

If there is something for spinners which we see in England and SA, then Jadeja comes in place of one of the pacer.

Don't understand the love for Ashwin. He is the best spinner in Subcontinent conditions. But we saw what can happen to him in CT when the pitches are flat. He will be belted to all parts of the ground and his fielding is terrible though he is has safe hands.

I would rathet pick Jaddu or Kuldeep a head of him. You need the Doosra to get wickets on flat beds.
 
Shami
Yadav
Bhuvi
Pandya
Ashwin

It should be the first pick in those conditions.

If there is something for spinners which we see in England and SA, then Jadeja comes in place of one of the pacer.

Still remember bhuvi bowling with 115 - 120kph on last Aus tour.He can't handle work load of 3 - 4 test match (will be useless in aus or flat decks).Shami is best but is injury prone.Umesh is fit but idk why he takes wickets and bowls rubbish.Ashwin is part time bowler outside Asia.Pandya will have to improve alot on both batting & more on bowling.
 
Don't understand the love for Ashwin. He is the best spinner in Subcontinent conditions. But we saw what can happen to him in CT when the pitches are flat. He will be belted to all parts of the ground and his fielding is terrible though he is has safe hands.

I would rathet pick Jaddu or Kuldeep a head of him. You need the Doosra to get wickets on flat beds.

Tests and ODIs are different. Ashwin has done very well on flat pitches recently against England and New Zealand.
 
Ashwin isn't in form and going by the 1st and 5th test in the series against England played 7-9 months ago he struggled on the flattest wickets in the series and was completely outbowled by Jadeja on these surfaces plus he hasn't done much in Eng, SA, NZ and Aus. I don't expect him to come up with warne-esque stats but he just doesn't look threatening in non-conducive conditions for spin.

Jadeja is currently India's best spinner but Yadav with his chinaman mystery brings another dimension into the spin attack - love his googly. These 2 spinners should be picked ahead of Ashwin with an XI looking like this for series in Aus, Eng, NZ and SA:

Dhawan/Vijay
Lokesh Rahul
Pujara
Kohli
Rahane
Saha
Pandya
Jadeja
B.Kumar/U.Yadav (kumar preferable in England, Umesh Yadav in Aus)
Shami
K.Yadav
 
Should India play Kuldeep Yadav outside the SC, in place of Ashwin and Jadeja?

India is scheduled to tour SA Eng and AUS over next 18 months.Only one spinner will likely play in the 11. While Ashwin and Jadeja are the leading spinners, would it be wiser to play Kuldeep?A wrist spinner is going to impart more revolutions and get more turn.Aus Eng SA batsman havent played him much so deciphering his action may not be that easy.Also SA and Aus have not been the best place for finger spinners historically.
 
We should play 2 spinners outside Asia in 80% of the games. 5 bowlers in total.

Any 2 out of these 3 based on performance - Ashwin, Jaddu and Kuldeep.
 
India is scheduled to tour SA Eng and AUS over next 18 months.Only one spinner will likely play in the 11. While Ashwin and Jadeja are the leading spinners, would it be wiser to play Kuldeep?A wrist spinner is going to impart more revolutions and get more turn.Aus Eng SA batsman havent played him much so deciphering his action may not be that easy.Also SA and Aus have not been the best place for finger spinners historically.
I don;t think that's true, unless we get real flat/dead or green mambas it's best we keep our two best test A/R in the squad. On real flatties I'd prefer Jadeja & Kuldeep over Ashwin/Jadeja & we need a lower order of Pandya, Ashwin, Jadeja, Saha, Kumar overseas to be able to post consistently good scores. I might be wrong or might not, but seeing how Ashwin, Jadeja have been doing their job with bat & bowl consistently over the last two years, it's hard to drop any of them right away without a sharp dip in form.
 
Think Ashwin will be valuable with the bat overseas unlike the other two.So Ashwin has to be the one if we are going with 5 bowlers because for 5 bowlers and if that has no Ashwin then batting looks really scary with Saha at 6 and other tailenders basically.
 
They will mostly end up playing 2 spinners, unless they play on green mambas.

The question though is which of the 2 spinners it will be. Ashwin should definitely be the one due to his batting.

Between Kuldeep and Jadeja, we would have to choose one. Kuldeep has a first class average of 28, with a century and 5 fifties in 24 matches. So he can bat. But Jadeja's batting is clutch. Whenever he scores it usually when we really need it.
 
Ashwin will be picked initially for the first few matches. If he fails to perform then he will have no chance to play outside of india.

India cannot wait for him to come good outside of india at the cost of losing tests
 
Kuldeep Yadav. Ashwin will be pretty much ineffective with ball however will be handy with bat. Id still go with Kuldeep Yadav as he can take wickets even on flatter surface.
 
We should play 2 spinners outside Asia in 80% of the games. 5 bowlers in total.

Any 2 out of these 3 based on performance - Ashwin, Jaddu and Kuldeep.

You mean 2 spinners plus 2 seamers and H Pandya?

Thats pretty weak bowling if you ask me. Spinners and Pandya aren't exactly wicket takers and relying on just two bowlers to win matches may backfire. India should atleast have 3 seamers plus H Pandya, so that leaves room for just one spinner.
Ideally, Id have 3 seamers 1 spinner and H Pandya. Your suggestion will have some merit if the pitch is flat, but on green mambas 3 seamers is must.
 
You mean 2 spinners plus 2 seamers and H Pandya?

Thats pretty weak bowling if you ask me. Spinners and Pandya aren't exactly wicket takers and relying on just two bowlers to win matches may backfire. India should atleast have 3 seamers plus H Pandya, so that leaves room for just one spinner.
Ideally, Id have 3 seamers 1 spinner and H Pandya. Your suggestion will have some merit if the pitch is flat, but on green mambas 3 seamers is must.

tbh, if Pandya can't be trusted be with 3rd seamer duties then he should not be played. Playing him makes no sense then as he would be under-utilised in bowling while bowling and his batting isn't of the level that he can take a pure batsman's spot. If Pandya plays, he has to play as the 3rd seamer.
 
You mean 2 spinners plus 2 seamers and H Pandya?

Thats pretty weak bowling if you ask me. Spinners and Pandya aren't exactly wicket takers and relying on just two bowlers to win matches may backfire. India should atleast have 3 seamers plus H Pandya, so that leaves room for just one spinner.
Ideally, Id have 3 seamers 1 spinner and H Pandya. Your suggestion will have some merit if the pitch is flat, but on green mambas 3 seamers is must.

3 proper pacers.

2 spinners.

Pandya out.

If pitch needs just 1 spinner, then Pandya in.
 
tbh, if Pandya can't be trusted be with 3rd seamer duties then he should not be played. Playing him makes no sense then as he would be under-utilised in bowling while bowling and his batting isn't of the level that he can take a pure batsman's spot. If Pandya plays, he has to play as the 3rd seamer.
Name one replacement who can take Pandya's spot as a pur batter, or bowler, & deliver consistently in any discipline he excels in? The idea to play two spinners is to give your best bowlers a chance to take 20 wickets, Ashwin/Jadeja/Kumar are our 3 best test bowlers & by best I mean consistently good.

Between them you can also expect anywhere between 100~200 runs (each test) on good tracks, on greener pastures we can drop Ashwin or Jadeja depending on their form &/or the number of righties/lefties in the side. The problem with playing 5 bowlers is that our top order doesn't match up to the greats of the past, at it's peak India had SRT/Dravid/Sehwag/Laxman/Saurav/Gautam who could outbat most oppositions, including Australia.

Though ideally bowlers win you games, but in the span of 2007/08 to 2010/11 our wins were mostly as a result of great batting even in tough conditions like SA. Yes we did have the horror run starting in England but before that series our batting failed just once overseas, 2008 against Mendis & co, we had a good 8 to 10 years of consistenly good to outstanding batting overseas.
 
Name one replacement who can take Pandya's spot as a pur batter, or bowler, & deliver consistently in any discipline he excels in? The idea to play two spinners is to give your best bowlers a chance to take 20 wickets, Ashwin/Jadeja/Kumar are our 3 best test bowlers & by best I mean consistently good.

Between them you can also expect anywhere between 100~200 runs (each test) on good tracks, on greener pastures we can drop Ashwin or Jadeja depending on their form &/or the number of righties/lefties in the side. The problem with playing 5 bowlers is that our top order doesn't match up to the greats of the past, at it's peak India had SRT/Dravid/Sehwag/Laxman/Saurav/Gautam who could outbat most oppositions, including Australia.

Though ideally bowlers win you games, but in the span of 2007/08 to 2010/11 our wins were mostly as a result of great batting even in tough conditions like SA. Yes we did have the horror run starting in England but before that series our batting failed just once overseas, 2008 against Mendis & co, we had a good 8 to 10 years of consistenly good to outstanding batting overseas.

But playing him in tests when he is not expected to do the 3rd seamers role doesn't make sense. In ODIs Pandya is the perfect all rounder. He bowls his quota of overs and can be trusted with the bat. In Tests, his batting is not of that level. And if the team management doesn't expect him to be the trusted 3rd seamer, then what is the point in playing. He will just bowl a few overs a test match and then not be expected to bat at 6?

In test an AR is expected to be able to get into the team by either batting or bowling. He needs to become good enough to get into the team either as a batsman or a bowler. Otherwise we are just wasting a spot. I am not saying he won't become good enough to be the 3rd seamer in the long run or that team management do not trust him with 3rd seamers duty.
 
But playing him in tests when he is not expected to do the 3rd seamers role doesn't make sense. In ODIs Pandya is the perfect all rounder. He bowls his quota of overs and can be trusted with the bat. In Tests, his batting is not of that level. And if the team management doesn't expect him to be the trusted 3rd seamer, then what is the point in playing. He will just bowl a few overs a test match and then not be expected to bat at 6?

In test an AR is expected to be able to get into the team by either batting or bowling. He needs to become good enough to get into the team either as a batsman or a bowler. Otherwise we are just wasting a spot. I am not saying he won't become good enough to be the 3rd seamer in the long run or that team management do not trust him with 3rd seamers duty.
Yeah that's not true, can anyone in modern times be expected to do a specialist bowler/batter role like the great A/R of the 80's or even Kallis? Ashwin is avg just about 30 odd in the last two years with the bat, Stokes is not that good a bowler outside England, Shakib won't get in the Indian side with his bowling alone.

Though I agree with the point that what Kohli asks from/of him that'll define his role in the team. If we need an extra lower order batter, I see him fulfilling that role, he can also be a good changeup bowler. A lot will depend on the surfaces we play on, also how our top order fares, in case anyone didn't know Pujara is having a horrid time atm in county cricket. He isn't half as good as Dravid away from home, let's hope he regains form & improves his technique.
 
Kuldeep Yadav has to bowl 30-40 overs in an innings before we can assess him logically, says Bishen Singh Bedi

Legendary left-arm spinner Bishan Singh Bedi is impressed with wrist spinner Kuldeep Yadav’s recent performances but would like to check out his control and variation over long spells in Test match cricket. “Look, it’s not easy to figure out whether Kuldeep has control watching him bowl four overs in T20 or 10 overs in ODIs. Let him bowl 30-40 overs in an innings, we can then figure. In India, we jump to conclusion very easily just after one hat-trick. So let’s not rush. Give him time to settle down and for us to assess him logically,” Bedi replied to a query from PTI during a promotional event at the Australian High Commission here. The former India captain, who has more than 260 Test wickets rated Gary Sobers as the best chinaman bowler to have ever played the game. “You know who was the best exponent of chinaman bowling. Sir Garfield Sobers. He used to bowl very effective left-arm wrist spin. He used to bowl with deep midwicket, deep square leg and deep mid-on. It was all about control. Then eventually, he started bowling orthodox,” Bedi said.

For him consistency comes with planning and strategy and not just by taking wickets irrespective of the quality of the delivery. “Whatever conditions you play, the bowler has to be consistent. We hear commentators use this term ‘bowled in right areas’. My question is what exactly is right area? Sometimes bowlers get wickets bowling long hops and full tosses. Are those right areas? Right areas exist in between your ears, where you prepare strategy!”

Bedi hoped that Kuldeep, who has only played two Test matches so far, survives the rigours of international cricket for long time to come. “Let’s hope for the best. It’s very rare and tough art. Right-arm leg spin is tough and left-arm leg break (chinaman) is even tougher. He (Kuldeep) is still very new to international cricket. I hope he learns the tricks of the trade. But but I would wish that while mastering the trade, he doesn’t forget the tricks,” he said.

He agreed that both Kuldeep and Yuzvendra Chahal have been able to outwit the Aussie batsmen in first two games. “Both the boys have bamboozled the Australian batsmen (in first 2 games).” But Bedi is unable to understand how Australia surrendered meekly in first two games. “I don’t know as I am struggling to press a button as to why Australia is not firing. There is a saying that when Kangaroo is hurt, it can kill you with its tail but it’s not happening,” he smiled and said.

Are these two bowlers better than Ravichandran Ashwin and Ravindra Jadeja, Bedi answered: “They are exciting options but then India are playing second string team and yet beating the Australians comfortably.” He then presented his perspective on the issue. “The reason we are winning is because we are playing well but the flip side is that the gulf between India and other teams have widened. So we need to be pragmatic. Our team has not been stretched in the last one year. Only match when we were stretched was the Champions Trophy final against Pakistan, which we lost,” Bedi said.

Asked if it’s a global phenomenon that international teams have become poor travellers, he said: “You can say that. Every team is happy to play at home. Even Australia would be waiting for India to come there (in 2018). Today teams are happier playing at home is a logical statement.” On a different note, Bedi who has been a vocal critic of the defiant BCCI officials said: “They understand the end is near and they won’t be able to hold on for long.”

http://www.financialexpress.com/spo...-him-logically-says-bishen-singh-bedi/868810/
 
Bedi going nuts, bowl 30/40 overs in an innings, does he want India to bowl 150/200 overs in them?
The reason we are winning is because we are playing well but the flip side is that the gulf between India and other teams have widened. So we need to be pragmatic. Our team has not been stretched in the last one year. Only match when we were stretched was the Champions Trophy final against Pakistan, which we lost
Also this is just sheer arrogance & stupidity by the old hack :facepalm:
 
Last edited:
Bump!

Kuldeep out of the reckoning for the South Africa tour, who would you start if you to play one of Ashwin or Jadeja?
 
[MENTION=79064]MMHS[/MENTION] [MENTION=53290]Markhor[/MENTION] [MENTION=131701]Mamoon[/MENTION] [MENTION=134809]sensible-indian-fan[/MENTION] [MENTION=133315]Hitman[/MENTION] [MENTION=141557]Chief Destroyer[/MENTION]

Ashwin or Jadeja for the 1st test versus South Africa?
 
Jadeja, though if it is a green seamer for all 5, or even 4, days then I'd pick 4 quicks (Pandya being one) & pack our side with 6 batters & Saha. Alternatively get Patel opening, with Vijay, & shift all the batters down a notch, Saha out & 4 seamers including Pandya.

People who're (over)rating Aus need to remember that Steyn, Philander, Rabada, Morris, Maharaj is the best bowling lineup in the world, in all conditions although their batting ain;t all that hot right now!
 
[MENTION=79064]MMHS[/MENTION] [MENTION=53290]Markhor[/MENTION] [MENTION=131701]Mamoon[/MENTION] [MENTION=134809]sensible-indian-fan[/MENTION] [MENTION=133315]Hitman[/MENTION] [MENTION=141557]Chief Destroyer[/MENTION]

Ashwin or Jadeja for the 1st test versus South Africa?

Jadeja.
 
[MENTION=79064]MMHS[/MENTION] [MENTION=53290]Markhor[/MENTION] [MENTION=131701]Mamoon[/MENTION] [MENTION=134809]sensible-indian-fan[/MENTION] [MENTION=133315]Hitman[/MENTION] [MENTION=141557]Chief Destroyer[/MENTION]

Ashwin or Jadeja for the 1st test versus South Africa?

Jadeja - livewire in the field who can bowl long, accurate spells. However, his batting has regressed alarmingly.

Ashwin - lousy fielder, but he can also bowl long, dry spells. He is a better batsman than Jadeja, but he is out of form nonetheless.

I think it is a tough call, but Ashwin should get the nod if South Africa play a lot of left-handers.
 
Last time they played a test, 5 out of the XI i the SA lineup were left handers. That and Ashwin's slightly better batting should give him the nod no?

Markram, Du Plessis, Amla, AB, Bavuma. On away tours, you play your best bowlers. Playing pseudo-allrounders for their batting never works out. If your batsmen fail, the half batsmen aren't going to make any difference. Play Jadeja to hold an end which your seamers will have difficulty with, and strike on day 4-5.
 
[MENTION=79064]MMHS[/MENTION] [MENTION=53290]Markhor[/MENTION] [MENTION=131701]Mamoon[/MENTION] [MENTION=134809]sensible-indian-fan[/MENTION] [MENTION=133315]Hitman[/MENTION] [MENTION=141557]Chief Destroyer[/MENTION]

Ashwin or Jadeja for the 1st test versus South Africa?

Jadeja - and this would have been my answer, when Ashwin was considered equal to or the spin version of Imran Khan (well, almost). Reasons I can explain, but I guess it's not appropriate here to discuss.

However, you kept option for only 2 - if it was open ended, I would have said 3 pacers + Pandeya and play the best Leggi in IND, if it's Kuldeep or Chahal or Mishra, doesn't matter ... and it's fine if he has to bat at 11.
 
Jadeja - and this would have been my answer, when Ashwin was considered equal to or the spin version of Imran Khan (well, almost). Reasons I can explain, but I guess it's not appropriate here to discuss.

However, you kept option for only 2 - if it was open ended, I would have said 3 pacers + Pandeya and play the best Leggi in IND, if it's Kuldeep or Chahal or Mishra, doesn't matter ... and it's fine if he has to bat at 11.


Kuldeep over Ashwin and Jadeja really?
 
If I was Indian i’d have gone for Kuldeep, he has the mystery factor and is a real wicket taking option.

He should have played a part in this series versus Sri Lanka. He needs more experience in tests. Not sure if he should start as the sole spinner overseas yet but he should have been in the squad.
 
He should have played a part in this series versus Sri Lanka. He needs more experience in tests. Not sure if he should start as the sole spinner overseas yet but he should have been in the squad.

Like someone said earlier they learned nothing vs SL. They should have at least given responsiblity to players like Kuldeep and tried out new batsmen.
 
Like someone said earlier they learned nothing vs SL. They should have at least given responsiblity to players like Kuldeep and tried out new batsmen.

Playing 4 bowlers was another poor idea. Could have tried out another seamer with Yadav not playing.
 
Ashwin, he can bat at 7. Jadeja and Kuldeep can't. If kuldeep had experience, then he should've gotten the spot. Jadeja is a decent #8 and isn't much better than Ashwin.
 
It will be between Ashwin and Jadeja. Kuldeep will surely not start the series in the X1.
 
Kuldeep over Ashwin and Jadeja really?

The best leggi - if it happens to be Kuldeep, then so it be. In a 4 bowler strategy, Jadeja can bowl 50 tight overs; but if IND plays Pandya (which they’ll), then the spinner has to be an wicket taking option.Ashwin is bowling poorly now while Jadeja can keep it tight, but he isn’t an attacker.

If Pandya wasn’t there, I would have gone for Jadeja.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ashwin, he can bat at 7. Jadeja and Kuldeep can't. If kuldeep had experience, then he should've gotten the spot. Jadeja is a decent #8 and isn't much better than Ashwin.
Really, I remember Jadeja's fifty at Lords being the crucial factor in our win over there, Ashwin has done jack all against good attacks in tough conditions, has actually been a dud with the bat last year wrt Jadeja.

Jadeja has however played crucial knocks against SA in Mohali, England again at Mohali & Aus at Dharamshala. If he isn't going for runs, or slogging, he actually has a better head than Ashwin on his shoulders. Isn't all that loose while batting in tests, unlike Ashwin who looks casual whatever he's doing all the time, as for his fielding the less said the better.
 
Last edited:
Markram, Du Plessis, Amla, AB, Bavuma. On away tours, you play your best bowlers. Playing pseudo-allrounders for their batting never works out. If your batsmen fail, the half batsmen aren't going to make any difference. Play Jadeja to hold an end which your seamers will have difficulty with, and strike on day 4-5.

Fair enough. I guess if we are playing Jadeja, we should play only 4 bowlers as MMHS as mentioned.
 
Really, I remember Jadeja's fifty at Lords being the crucial factor in our win over there, Ashwin has done jack all against good attacks in tough conditions, has actually been a dud with the bat last year wrt Jadeja.

Jadeja has however played crucial knocks against SA in Mohali, England again at Mohali & Aus at Dharamshala. If he isn't going for runs, or slogging, he actually has a better head than Ashwin on his shoulders. Isn't all that loose while batting in tests, unlike Ashwin who looks casual whatever he's doing all the time, as for his fielding the less said the better.

You’re right. As a lower order batsman Jadeja has played some crucial knocks, but Ashwin has scored 4 hundreds while Jadeja has none. I take your point that Jadeja has been more impressive with runs at crucial times.

Ashwin is my pick if India play their 5 best specialist batsmen with Hardik at 6.

Vijay, Rahul, Pujara, Kohli, and Rahane. Dhawan and Rohit fill their boots at home, but perform like white ball specialists in tough conditions abroad.

Then there’s Pujara who hasn’t been the same batsman away than at home. What’s then tricky is that Rahane is terribly out of form, but you can’t drop a guy who I’d bet is more likely to play crucial innings than Kohli.

Then there’s Hardik who is an X-factor cricketer but it’s anybody’s guess if he will succeed abroad.

As a batsman, Saha is more Dowrich than Bairstow.

With this in mind, I think India need Ashwin at 7 because Jadeja can’t bat higher than 8.

However, if there’s 6 specialist batsmen, then Jadeja and Kuldeep are better picks as Ashwin couldn’t even hack it at Division 2 in county cricket this summer [I might be wrong]. That's presuming India don't play Dhawan and Rohit in the same XI.

What do you think?
 
Last edited:
You’re right. As a lower order batsman Jadeja has played some crucial knocks, but Ashwin has scored 4 hundreds while Jadeja has none. I take your point that Jadeja has been more impressive with runs at crucial times.

Ashwin is my pick if India play their 5 best specialist batsmen with Hardik at 6.

Vijay, Rahul, Pujara, Kohli, and Rahane. Dhawan and Rohit fill their boots at home, but perform like white ball specialists in tough conditions abroad.

Then there’s Pujara who hasn’t been the same batsman away than at home. What’s then tricky is that Rahane is terribly out of form, but you can’t drop a guy who I’d bet is more likely to play crucial innings than Kohli.

Then there’s Hardik who is an X-factor cricketer but it’s anybody’s guess if he will succeed abroad.

As a batsman, Saha is more Dowrich than Bairstow.

With this in mind, I think India need Ashwin at 7 because Jadeja can’t bat higher than 8.

However, if there’s 6 specialist batsmen, then Jadeja and Kuldeep are better picks as Ashwin couldn’t even hack it at Division 2 in county cricket this summer [I might be wrong]. That's presuming India don't play Dhawan and Rohit in the same XI.

What do you think?

Actually, when it comes to county cricket, you are indeed wrong. Ashwin did take 20 wickets in 4 matches at 29 this season. He also scored 214 runs in 6 innings with an average of 42.

Between Ashwin and Jadeja, one could go for either. But despite Jadeja's great showing over the last year, I still feel Ashwin might have something more to offer. Again, its close, and as AR or bowlers, Kohli could go with either.
 
Back
Top