What's new

Australia v Pakistan | 2nd Test - Day 1 | SCG | 3/01/10

thats so lucky for australia


i cant believe it, that it woudnt hit a peace of the bails
 
Chappelli doesn't agree with hawkeye. I remember Waqar once in NZ disagree with it too as it tracked the ball going high
 
Last edited:
They can't calibrate hawkeye half-way through the game can they? That looked absoloutely plumb
 
HAwkeye is not right - that is hitting him so low.

Even the commentators are baffled
 
Er...IMO, we shouldn't even bother appealing for LBWs anymore. Waste of time. Rather focus on getting the edge or disturbing the stumps
 
i want to see how many lbw's that have been over turned against Pakistan since this hawk eye decision making started and how many have been given against us using hawk eye. Again i call for, who developed this software and who is tuning/running it. It is a SOFTWARE..
 
That is odd. I thought in NZ they couldn't use the predicted path, they just have to look at it and say it looks like it is hitting. I thought they couldn't use the blue portion or did they change it?
 
This Mark Nichalos guy is a pain in the backside, he keeps saying Pak have lost a review whenever Australia lose one.
 
zaid65 said:
I am sure other ones have done the home work but because of the racism, they don't show their work. Ian Chappell not only one of the best analyst/commentator but seems good human being ( along with Lawson).

You are a clown mate. Seriously you think that?
 
Oxy said:
HAwkeye is not right - that is hitting him so low.

Even the commentators are baffled
Hawkeye can easily be input with a parameter that tells it to behave itself in a certain way. It's a damn black box with nobody knowing what happens inside.
 
ZAK said:
This Mark Nichalos guy is a pain in the backside, he keeps saying Pak have lost a review whenever Australia lose one.
..when NOBODY has lost one.

Hes THICK!
 
Chappel still going on about the LBW saying its rubbish as to how it'll be going over the stumps and rightly so!
 
Nicholas just did a 180 and agreed with Chappel, does he have an original bone in his body?
 
Asif is pretty good against the lefties. North being seriously troubled by the length.
 
Even though I don't enjoy cricindia articles by Ian Chappell, but he is pretty spot on here...
 
USaqaf said:
Nicholas just did a 180 and agreed with Chappel, does he have an original bone in his body?

Nicholas is the quintessential bimbo of cricket broadcasting...
 
Oxy said:
HAwkeye is not right - that is hitting him so low.

Even the commentators are baffled

That didn't look high to me live, still doesn't BUT he did get a bigger stride in that I thought so the ball had a longer way to travel than I thought when I first saw it.

We're going to get this 5th wicket sooner rather than later if we keep bowling like this so I'm not too annoyed at the moment. If this partnership is still going in 15 overs time then I'll feel differently though
 
Watch them overcompensate the Hawk Eye and ball hitting the stump in Pak inning!!! Freaking rubbish...
 
I cant get over that decision - plumb - hitting below the knee roll, not rising.

Billy doesnt give LBWs - like hell we get one now!
 
The frame freeze is showing now that the ball would have hit the top of the bails...
 
WTH was that? it looked pretty plumb. Hard luck Asif. Hope he will shatter the stumps again.
 
Cheguvera said:
Even though I don't enjoy cricindia articles by Ian Chappell, but he is pretty spot on here...

He is a very good commentator and analyst. Where he lets himself down is when he tries to predict what will happen in the future, that is not his strong suit.

Yay we scored a run!
 
I hope they show that raw graphic again. I swear the ball was below the blue part where it should have been.
 
Lol now are we blaming the hawkeye ? :D
Another Conspiracy to thwart the Asians ascent to the top eh ?
 
Back
Top