What's new

Australia v Pakistan | 2nd Test - Day 1 | SCG | 3/01/10

You're right, they weren't showing the predicted path in NZ. I guess they have different rules for the UDRS in every series?

Amir said:
That is odd. I thought in NZ they couldn't use the predicted path, they just have to look at it and say it looks like it is hitting. I thought they couldn't use the blue portion or did they change it?
 
Watch now against Pakistan these same hawkeyes will show balls hit high on the knee flaps to be miraculously dipping and hit mid high on the stumps...
 
Dr_Bassim said:
Lol now are we blaming the hawkeye ? :D
Another Conspiracy to thwart the Asians ascent to the top eh ?

Erm....tell that to Ian Chappel & Mike Slater who are stunned by the decion = they say OUT!
 
Random Aussie said:
He is a very good commentator and analyst. Where he lets himself down is when he tries to predict what will happen in the future, that is not his strong suit.

Yay we scored a run!
He is the best in the world.
 
Time for Gul to get off as i said, Kaneria from this end, keep Asif for 1/2 more from other and then bring back Sami from that
 
Gul needs to be called back he has totally lost his rythm. May be Tanvir from Karachi blue can bowl better here.
 
It should be if there are more options filled in.

In the referal to Asif's delivery, 3 of the 4 options were blanked in. Only the Hawkeye option failed them, and just that changed the result?!?
 
Cheguvera said:
Watch now against Pakistan these same hawkeyes will show balls hit high on the knee flaps to be miraculously dipping and hit mid high on the stumps...
Yes sweetheart, as i said, its a conspiracy.
They make sure Pakistani batsmen get out to LBW's and they make sure Australians dont.
Cuz after all , Pakistanis are the best team in the world. How else could they win against us, or stop our relentless march towards Top of the table :D
 
saadibaba said:
This last decision showed the deficiencies of the hawkeye system


Definitely, shows we're overly confident in the 1s and 0s. It might be the digital age, but that was something that should have been dealt with manually. North can consider himself very lucky.
 
Really angry right now.

We should've had that fifth.

How in the world was that going over.
 
To be fair it was also missing the off stump also, maybe not nipped back enough but no way was that going over
 
Dr_Bassim said:
Yes sweetheart, as i said, its a conspiracy.
They make sure Pakistani batsmen get out to LBW's and they make sure Australians dont.
Cuz after all , Pakistanis are the best team in the world. How else could they win against us, or stop our relentless march towards Top of the table :D


So who do you really support?
 
people questioning Hawkeye (including Ian Chappell) should read this article.
http://www.cricinfo.com/ci/content/story/125938.html
this is from 6 years ago. technology can only have improved since then.

i don't have a problem with Hawkeye. i think it's consistent, definitely much more consistent than a human umpire can ever be.

but i think the issue here is the review system. the UDRS should be taken out of the players' hand and put directly into the umpires'. IF the umpire makes a howler like Ashoka De Silva earlier, then the 3rd umpire should overturn it. otherwise the original decision should stand.
 
Yousuf has a word with Asif and next ball is a wicket.

Negative, sifarshi, defensive, reactive, clueless captaincy ZINDABAD!! :moyo
 
HUSSEY is GONE! we are SET! we need to NOT collapse in our batting now and get a high lead up. this match is ours
 
Now the batsmen will say it was a 100 run pitch when they go all out for 25 lol!
 
Back
Top