Amjid Javed
PakPassion's 100,000 posts man
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2004
- Runs
- 118,449
- Post of the Week
- 8
Tamim needs to score a big hundred or even double here to bail bangladesh out of a huge whole. AT moment they are staring at a huge defeat!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Amjid Javed said:swann took a wicket in his 1st over for 12 th time in his shortcareer thats a great feat to achieve!
Kriketer said:wow 12th time? now that's an impressive achievement.
England is all over Bangladesh here. Don't know when our Bangla brothers will give a very strong fight to their opponents. They hardly ever start strongly.
Robert said:Well, that's Steyn at present, and Tamin averages 12 against SA. It would appear that Steyn conquered Tamim with ease.
Look, your boy obviously has batting talent - it's not his record I have an issue with - rather your hyperbole regarding him.
Equinox said:Right forgot about Umar. He should be there. Mushfiq and Kamran are about equal although Mushfiq has been very consistent witht the bat lately. And if we go with one spinner Shakib>Kaneria anyday. There was no turn on Day 1 at all and England took full advantage of that. If England bat again you'll see Shakib ripping the English batsmen apart.
Whippy said:1-133 from 34 overs and 1 run from 20 balls and 30 minutes, plus a village shot in the penultimate over that has pretty much sealed the team losing, and a Ponting-esque 'we're gonna have a bowl this morning mate'
BRRRRRR!
Whippy said:there are so so so many things wrong with this post. I think Bangladesh are a bit comical as a test side, but I' m not cruel and don't want their whole infrastructure to fail completely. However, when someone comes out with this much pompous, biased tosh then what can I do other than fire back, get a grip mate, you're 450 runs behind and been completely dominated for the whole tour, your team are pants and you're going to lose. Even if it rains for five sessions, in the position you're in now, you would probably still lose.
Ashraful_Rox said:I think Junaid, Imrul, Aftab and Rubel needs to be replaced by Jahurul islam, Faisal Hossain, Dhiman Ghosh (we need a proper keeper) and Shurowardi Shuvo( he can flight and turn the ball).
Whippy said:hm, any stats guru out there? I don't know if an England batsman has ever scored twin hundreds in his first test as captain. Cook has a chance of doing so!
Ashraful_Rox said:I think Junaid, Imrul, Aftab and Rubel needs to be replaced by Jahurul islam, Faisal Hossain, Dhiman Ghosh (we need a proper keeper) and Shurowardi Shuvo( he can flight and turn the ball).
Khabri420 said:Spoke too soon![]()
Whippy said:there are so so so many things wrong with this post. I think Bangladesh are a bit comical as a test side, but I' m not cruel and don't want their whole infrastructure to fail completely. However, when someone comes out with this much pompous, biased tosh then what can I do other than fire back, get a grip mate, you're 450 runs behind and been completely dominated for the whole tour, your team are pants and you're going to lose. Even if it rains for five sessions, in the position you're in now, you would probably still lose.
Robert said:130-5, England making a bit of a mess of this actually.
They wouldn't get away with this against India or SA or Australia.
Poison said:They wouldnt be carrying a 300 run first innings lead against those three sides.
Poison said:Shakib has not bowled well !
He got his first wicket off a long hop and his second after Pietersen cracked him for a six and a four and went for another one!
Easa said:Did I just read Shakib > Kaneria?)
)
)
bullseye7 said:For future , BD better talk long and hard with the curator with regards to preparation of pitch for the second test and ensure a one is prepared that is favorable to them and starts to behave on time.
Amjid Javed said:swann took a wicket in his 1st over for 12 th time in his shortcareer thats a great feat to achieve!
Ashraful_Rox said:Swann is a better spinner than Shakib, the best spinner in the world at the moment. He'll do well in the Ashes.
Ashraful_Rox said:man why are the selectors keep picking Imrul who averages lower than 15 after 10 tests
Drop Junaid and Imrul, kick aftab, shoot Rubel
Ashraful_Rox said:Atherton when Carberry got out he said "That wouldn't be out 30 years ago" hello if you are so interested in lbw decisions of the past, just go watch the highlights. (
Whippy said:Shakib has had a MARE! He CANNOT handle Swann
Whippy said:Swann has snared him 3 or 4 times on the tour now. I also think he is a better all-rounder than his new rabbit
Ashraful_Rox said:That was a poor decision by the umpire, it clearly hit the glove not the pad. Pretty weird decisions, this umpire Rod Tucker want to apply for a British passport along with Shamim.
Mushfiqur Rahim batted very well in the first innings. There is a replay of Shakib's dismissal that he in fact got a full glove on the sweep shot, it was tangled near his pads, but the ball came straight off the gloves and was squeezed into the ground.
http://www.cricinfo.com/bdeshveng2010/engine/current/match/426423.html
But still I rate Swann higher than him. Terrible decision this one, maybe you still think this is out![]()
Whippy said:we won't bat 2 more sessions, it will be 1 more at most. I expect to wrap up tomorrow.
Ashraful_Rox said:man why are the selectors keep picking Imrul who averages lower than 15 after 10 tests
Drop Junaid and Imrul, kick aftab, shoot Rubel
Whippy said:if you have a batsman's number you generally get the rub of the green against him, always been the case. just as England have Bangladesh's number, and the amount of pressure and chances we have created, we deserve our position. Complaining about an lbw is clutching at straws, as a very uncomfortable-looking Shakib's general cluelessness on how to pick or play Swann's deliveries would only have done for him more legitimately after tea.
The cricinfo text is one thing. I actually saw it. It wasn't a terrible decision, it was a groping, unprofessional shot to a straight ball, and whenever that happens you will get a strong appeal that will convince the majority of people in the ground. it was a bad decision. terrible decisions are a lot worse than that.
Imtiazk said:Whippy, you are talking rubbish. The previous ball was swept for four. He swept his way to a hundred thrashing Vettori. That is his trademark shot to put off bowlers like Swann. Unless the umpires give a GBW. The ball hit his gloves smack on and did not even ricochet against the pads - it never touched the pads !
Random Aussie said:No he won't. Offspinners get smashed in Australia, can't remember anyone who has come here and done OK.
Whippy said:if you have a batsman's number you generally get the rub of the green against him, always been the case. just as England have Bangladesh's number, and the amount of pressure and chances we have created, we deserve our position. Complaining about an lbw is clutching at straws, as a very uncomfortable-looking Shakib's general cluelessness on how to pick or play Swann's deliveries would only have done for him more legitimately after tea.
The cricinfo text is one thing. I actually saw it. It wasn't a terrible decision, it was a groping, unprofessional shot to a straight ball, and whenever that happens you will get a strong appeal that will convince the majority of people in the ground. it was a bad decision. terrible decisions are a lot worse than that.
I thought test umpires were suppose to be neutral these days?Robert said:One thing you will learn about test cricket is that the side putting the pressure on (i.e. England) tends to get the decisions in their favour - even wrong ones. It's due to psychological factors in the umpires.
Imtiazk said:Drop Junaid ? Really ?
BD-fan said:I thought test umpires were suppose to be neutral these days?
What I mean to say is that the umpire's judgement will be swayed by what he sees and hears, but also by psychological factors. He will give Monty Pansar out lbw, but SRT not out to an identical ball because SRT is great and couldn't have just missed that one could he?BD-fan said:I thought test umpires were suppose to be neutral these days?