Can India play their own Bazzball style cricket?

Unbiased-Fan

Local Club Star
Joined
Oct 25, 2021
Runs
2,016
Currently India have better attacking set of batsman than England.
Rohit Sharma, Yashawi, Gill, Kohli, Sarfaraz, Iyer and Jurel are more than capable of scoring runs at brisk rate.
Inclusion of Rishab Pant, Prithwi Shaw, Hardik and Suryakumar will further improve scoring rate.

I think Bazzball will be the future of test cricket as we'll see more result oriented test matches.

These Indian batting lineup will be scary if they adopt fast scoring approach in test cricket.

Rohit *
Yashaswi
Gill
Kohli
Pant
Jadeja
Jurel (w)
Ashwin / Pandya (overseas)
Shami
Bumrah
Siraj

Thoughts?
 
Play normally in normal pitches ..play Bazball in extreme batting or bowling friendly pitches..
 
Bazball is rubbish. It is a topi drama by England and an unsustainable way to play Test cricket.

India, or any other team, does not need to play Bazball because they have proper Test cricketers who can win matches by playing proper Test cricket.

India doesn’t need to change anything about the way they play and approach Test cricket. The only thing they need to be careful about is to manage the transition to the next generation more carefully.

You wouldn’t want to lose Ashwin, Jadeja, Shami, Bumrah and also the duo of Kohli and Rohit at the same time but there is a danger that might happen and it will have some impact, at least short-term, on their results.
 
Bazball against weaker bowling units than your own.

Play more conventionally against better attacks and tire them out.
 
Surely each team should just do what is best and most natural for them.
Are England indirectly saying that there are no "normal" test quality players in county cricket and thereby maximising the output of available talents? Or are they saying no matter what this is the way to play tests?
 
Are England indirectly saying that there are no "normal" test quality players in county cricket and thereby maximising the output of available talents? Or are they saying no matter what this is the way to play tests?
Well county players know they aren't going to break into a stokes/mcculum team by tuk tuking. So those that are pushing for a national place are influenced by Bazball and decide to play faster.
 
Well county players know they aren't going to break into a stokes/mcculum team by tuk tuking. So those that are pushing for a national place are influenced by Bazball and decide to play faster.
So basically England will now try to prioritize T20 players in Tests over proper old school test cricketers. Okay!
 
India should try to follow the bazball approach in swinging/seaming conditions i.e. tests played in England and South Africa.
 
They don’t need to. Keep doing what y’all have been doing and keep dominating at home.

Don’t fix what’s not broken.

Don’t have to copy every trend England engages in.
 
It's so cringe when fans and media of other teams keep repeating ''bazball'' ad nauseam. Give it a rest.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
OP, how about you explain this part?

8. Ashwin/Pandya overseas

Pandya at #8 means we play him as bowling all rounder in tests? The guy who struggles to bowl ODIs will play in Tests in a role of bowl A/R?
 
Each batsman shouldn't deviate too much from their nature. It will impact their performance and team performance in the long run. Players with multiple gears can do. But not everyone. Pujara for all his defiance he used to play some fast knocks when he was new. Batsmen have to make the call sensing the pulse. Not the captain or team management unless it is for declaration
 
Bazball got exposed. India needs to do what they are doing pretty successfully at home. No need to change anything. Just select good players and it will be fine.
 
No need to play Tests like T20 just to attract an audience - we will end up diluting the skill & technique of our newbie first class players. BCCI is doing well to prioritise red ball cricket - absolutely no need to diverge when the team is delivering results playing traditional cricket.

Also, just read that BCCI will now pay average IPL level salaries to Ranji cricketers. Fantastic news!
 
Also, just read that BCCI will now pay average IPL level salaries to Ranji cricketers. Fantastic news!

Clearly you read wrong LOL

What even is IPL salary btw? 25 crore or 20 lacs? If it's 20 lacs then BCCI is already paying twice that amount to Ranji cricketers.
 
Bazball approach is a disgrace! It's one thing to play with an aggressive mindset, in fact I have always advocated that. A strike rate between 50 to 55 is essential (more is better) in today's Test cricket.

But to try and strike at run a ball or even more makes no sense. Remember, it's ODI cricket that has changed because of the 2 new ball rule and multiple other factors, Test cricket has mostly remained the same.
 
Clearly you read wrong LOL

What even is IPL salary btw? 25 crore or 20 lacs? If it's 20 lacs then BCCI is already paying twice that amount to Ranji cricketers.
Look at this -

 
Look at this -


Thanks. A lot more clarity there. So IPL salary is the lower/mid range which is fair enough.

So someone like Pujara can make 2 million USD playing just the tests. And domestic FC cricketers can make roughly 100k USD. Not bad at all.
 
The premise of this thread is totally ridiculous.
India have just won the last Test by five wickets and the preceding one by 400 runs.

It what altered reality should they try to ape a side that has been exposed ?


Australia and India will play their way because they have the confidence, resources and skill to do that.
 
The premise of this thread is totally ridiculous.
India have just won the last Test by five wickets and the preceding one by 400 runs.

It what altered reality should they try to ape a side that has been exposed ?


Australia and India will play their way because they have the confidence, resources and skill to do that.
Adopting good things is good for you. English team may not have a team to beat India but that doesn't mean their playing style is without value.
 
Adopting good things is good for you. English team may not have a team to beat India but that doesn't mean their playing style is without value.

“Value” in elite sport is defined by winning —this England team are not doing that against the opposition that matters.
Playing sexy, attacking cricket is irrelevant if you don’t win.
 
“Value” in elite sport is defined by winning —this England team are not doing that against the opposition that matters.
Playing sexy, attacking cricket is irrelevant if you don’t win.
A failing student not getting first class isn't a failure.

England won 1 test in 17 before "Bazball'. They were beyond pathetic. Their new approach has bought them value.

I don't want India or Australia to emulate it wholesale. I just want more batters to be proactive. Some batters already do this. Head and Pant are better bazballers than anyone from England.
 
Back
Top