What's new

Charlie Kirk's suspected killer brought into custody after confessing to father [Update@ Post 360]

Patriot

Local Club Regular
Joined
Jan 15, 2010
Runs
1,399
US conservative figure and MAGA supporter that engages with college students at campuses has been shot dead by a shooter at a college campus event.

Shocking news since I have seen a fair few of Kirk’s videos. I didn’t like the guy but this was horrific. I also saw the video and it was horrible, wouldn’t recommend it. He was shot in neck and there was a lot of blood.

===

Charlie Kirk, a conservative activist and close ally of President Donald Trump who played an influential role in rallying young Republican voters, was shot and killed Wednesday at a Utah college event in what the governor called a political assassination carried out from a rooftop. A person of interest was in custody, officials said.

“This is a dark day for our state. It’s a tragic day for our nation,” said Utah Gov. Spencer Cox. “I want to be very clear this is a political assassination.”

Authorities did not immediately identify the person in custody, a motive or any criminal charges, but the circumstances of the shooting drew renewed attention to an escalating threat of political violence in the United States that in the last several years has cut across the ideological spectrum. The FBI, which investigates such acts, was helping lead the inquiry, though officials said at this point they had no reason to believe a second person was involved.


 
Last edited by a moderator:
Charlie Kirk was an anti-Islam guy. He was also against many other groups. He was a right-wing white supremacist pretty much.

I guess some left-wing person shot and killed him. We have to wait and see what really happened and who did this for what reason.
 
Yes he was all those things but seeing that is horrific and I wouldn’t want that for anyone, unless they are a criminal that has done horrific things like murder, genocide, rape, etc. Even then I believe in the right to a fair trial, which is what Islam says. Let’s not lose our humanity and go back to Jahiliyah.

Note - I’m not specifically aiming this at you @sweep_shot, but rather a general comment.
 
Yes he was all those things but seeing that is horrific and I wouldn’t want that for anyone, unless they are a criminal that has done horrific things like murder, genocide, rape, etc. Even then I believe in the right to a fair trial, which is what Islam says. Let’s not lose our humanity and go back to Jahiliyah.

Note - I’m not specifically aiming this at you @sweep_shot, but rather a general comment.

Yeah. I don't support this type of political violence at all.

I was just pointing out he made many enemies and angered many different groups. He was a right-wing white supremacist fella.
 
The extreme ends of both sides of US will eventually boil down to a civil war, it keeps getting worse so it's no surprise such incident has happened.

The only thing both sides of US unite on is boot licking their genocidal Nazi masters in Israel
Yeah, we aren’t far off from the US descending into a civil war. I don’t live there so can’t say for sure but from the news we get, it seems there is so much political hate between left and right.
 
Suspect has been apprehended apparently.

Suspect in Charlie Kirk shooting is in custody, FBI says​

From CNN's Aditi Sangal
A suspect in the shooting and killing of conservative activist Charlie Kirk is now in custody, FBI Director Kash Patel announced.
 
The MAGA moron and Director of the FBI Kash ‘Tweaking’ Patel, incorrectly posting on X that they have arrested the shooter, when they had the wrong guy lol. The shooter is officially still at large and being hunted.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7045.jpeg
    IMG_7045.jpeg
    231.8 KB · Views: 9
Kirk is a religious Christian who preaches Christian values. I have seen lots of videos of him and his main theme is to counter woke, antifa, blm and trans movement.

He usually visits college campuses and challenges students on socialism and systemic racism and police brutality, blm topics.
 
Charlie Kirk was an anti-Islam guy. He was also against many other groups. He was a right-wing white supremacist pretty much.

I guess some left-wing person shot and killed him. We have to wait and see what really happened and who did this for what reason.

Explain how he is a white supremecist? You seem to know the guy very well.
 
The MAGA moron and Director of the FBI Kash ‘Tweaking’ Patel, incorrectly posting on X that they have arrested the shooter, when they had the wrong guy lol. The shooter is officially still at large and being hunted.
He is a person of interest. They are interrogating him. Even if he is not , the culprit will be caught quickly.
 
Kirk is a religious Christian who preaches Christian values. I have seen lots of videos of him and his main theme is to counter woke, antifa, blm and trans movement.

He usually visits college campuses and challenges students on socialism and systemic racism and police brutality, blm topics.

He was also a white supremacist and an anti-Islam guy. Check below:

Kirk served on President Donald Trump's 1776 Commission, a response to the 1619 Project.[87] Assuming "more hard-right positions", he said that Democratic immigration policies were aimed at "diminishing and decreasing white demographics in America."

Following the victory of Zohran Mamdani in the 2025 New York City Democratic mayoral primary, Kirk posted that "24 years ago a group of Muslims killed 2,753 people on 9/11. Now a Muslim Socialist is on pace to run New York City." Liberal Fox News commentator Jessica Tarlov asked Kirk to take down the "gross and islamophobic" post.[113] In a separate post, Kirk argued that "It's not Islamophobia to notice that Muslims want to import values into the West that seek to destabilize our civilization."[114] In 2018, Kirk spoke at the annual conference of anti-Muslim group ACT for America, an organization with multiple ties to Turning Point USA.[115]


Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Kirk.
 
The guy was pro gun and claimed Palestinians didn’t exist, blamed them for their destruction. Divisive rhetoric makes you an open target. Nobody is safe now. The right wing loons are going to crazy in America.
 
He was also a white supremacist and an anti-Islam guy. Check below:

Kirk served on President Donald Trump's 1776 Commission, a response to the 1619 Project.[87] Assuming "more hard-right positions", he said that Democratic immigration policies were aimed at "diminishing and decreasing white demographics in America."

Following the victory of Zohran Mamdani in the 2025 New York City Democratic mayoral primary, Kirk posted that "24 years ago a group of Muslims killed 2,753 people on 9/11. Now a Muslim Socialist is on pace to run New York City." Liberal Fox News commentator Jessica Tarlov asked Kirk to take down the "gross and islamophobic" post.[113] In a separate post, Kirk argued that "It's not Islamophobia to notice that Muslims want to import values into the West that seek to destabilize our civilization."[114] In 2018, Kirk spoke at the annual conference of anti-Muslim group ACT for America, an organization with multiple ties to Turning Point USA.[115]


Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Kirk.
There are Muslims who openly support implementation of sharia in the west. It is called politics. He is catering to white vote bank. Happens in all countries. That does not make them racist.

If Bangladeshi government imports millions of Buddhists from East Asia which can change the demographics, you will be crying foul too. It’s all about votes in a democracy and each vote matters. Every political party has its own vote bank and they guard it with full devotion.
Anyways, you have become an expert in labeling people, groups and nations to your choice of whims. Anyone who opposes your views and beliefs is a moron and a racist.

Democrats call Trump orange clown and white supremecist all day. Now imagine if a republican calls a minority person the same. The crying will be endless.
 
The more I dig deep regarding Charlie Kirk, the more he comes off as a scumbag. Check this tweet from Charlie (he showed no compassion for Palestinian civilian deaths):


Charlie Kirk basically said America nuking Japan in WW2 was not the fault of America. What a scumbag!

2 American nukes killed thousands of innocent Japanese.
 
Even though I obviously disagreed with his views, nobody deserves this. I sympathise with his wife and two young children.

America is a disgusting and horrible place that is full of gun loving weirdos. Events like this will keep on happening but the moronic Americans will keep on repeating the “2nd amendment” mantra.
 
Charlie Kirk basically said America nuking Japan in WW2 was not the fault of America. What a scumbag!

2 American nukes killed thousands of innocent Japanese.
Whether nuking Japan is right or wrong is debatable. But Japan was on a killing spree and needed a check. They murdered thousands and mutilated their bodies and raped thousands all through south east Asia and even entered India.
Again using nuclear weapon may not be needed. But I doubt a conventional war would have stopped Japan from their rampage.
 
Except, Kirk did not kill anyone. This Hassan Mafi guy lacks brain cells. Horrible fail with his correlation.
Neither did the Palestinian babies that were killed by the IDF.

The whole blame the victim narrative is disgusting.

Israel is to blame for bombing Palestinians and this shooter is to blame for killing Charlie Kirk.
 
Here is another outrageous statement from Charlie Kirk:

Charlie Kirk: “It’s worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God given rights”

Ironically, he died from what he preached.


In a nutshell, Charlie said some gun-related deaths were necessary in America so that Americans could have reasons to own guns (i.e., 2nd ammendment).

He was basically saying it was okay for some people to die from gun violence. What an outrageous thing to say!

Ironically, he himself became one of the gun violence victims.
 
Neither did the Palestinian babies that were killed by the IDF.

The whole blame the victim narrative is disgusting.

Israel is to blame for bombing Palestinians and this shooter is to blame for killing Charlie Kirk.
Neither did Israeli people.

Hamas does not want to come out of their tunnels and still fighting hiding among civilians.

No point in derailing the thread. Loss of life of innocents is always terrible.i always believ that wars should be fought away from civilian areas. Hamas use civilians as human shields and Israel don’t care who they are bombing. Both are wrong.
At this point I feel both Hamas and IDF must finish off each other.
 
Exactly, that's why I have the same sympathy for him as he did for Palestinians.

Yup.

It seems like he was cheering for Palestinian deaths. He himself is now dead.

I can't feel sorry for this man. He was not a good man.

Having said that, I do not support this type of violence. Taking law into hand is not a right strategy.
 
Here’s another Indian with big brains, the language he used was regularly inflammatory. These guys say the worst things and then expect no repercussions.

That’s not how the world works sunshine.
Grow some peaches sunshine. Speeches are always inflammatory. That is what galvanizes masses. He never asked for genocide and there is freedom of speech in the west unlike your favorite nation.

Only loonies resort to violence when they cannot debate. Words never kill anyone. Guns do.
 
I hope their two young children will grow up to be better versions of their father.
 
I hope their two young children will grow up to be better versions of their father.

Yup.

I hope they will not be heartless like their father (who supported Palestinian deaths and gun violence deaths in America). I hope they will be kind and compassionate.
 
Neither did Israeli people.

Hamas does not want to come out of their tunnels and still fighting hiding among civilians.

No point in derailing the thread. Loss of life of innocents is always terrible.i always believ that wars should be fought away from civilian areas. Hamas use civilians as human shields and Israel don’t care who they are bombing. Both are wrong.
At this point I feel both Hamas and IDF must finish off each other.
I agree, there were Israeli civilians killed on Oct 7 and that was wrong and monstrous.

The human shield narrative is complex. Gaza is literally a tiny place and you can’t avoid a militia/terrorist entity from operating in civilian areas. Hamas can’t fight a conventional war as it doesn’t have the equipment to do so. Hence why they use the tunnel system and will fight dirty. But Israel is deliberately targeting civilians. International Drs and NGOs have all provided testimonies on how the IDF snipes kids, I have seen videos of their drones killing civilians with no weapons, they killed ambulance crews and then buried the whole ambulances to hide the evidence and so much more.

Israel also uses Human shields when they have Mossad safe houses bang in the middle of Tel Aviv.
Grow some peaches sunshine. Speeches are always inflammatory. That is what galvanizes masses. He never asked for genocide and there is freedom of speech in the west unlike your favorite nation.

Only loonies resort to violence when they cannot debate. Words never kill anyone. Guns do.
Interestingly Kirk was anti gun laws in the US.
 
Grow some peaches sunshine. Speeches are always inflammatory. That is what galvanizes masses. He never asked for genocide and there is freedom of speech in the west unlike your favorite nation.

Only loonies resort to violence when they cannot debate. Words never kill anyone. Guns do.
Another free speech merchant, are you taking about Hitlers speeches? “Galvanise masses” lol.

Go out on the street in India and shout Pakistan Zindabad!. See what happens to you. Probably get lynched.
 
Another free speech merchant, are you taking about Hitlers speeches? “Galvanise masses” lol.

Go out on the street in India and shout Pakistan Zindabad!. See what happens to you. Probably get lynched.
As long as the speech is not asking for genocide or killing an individual or group, all kinds of criticisms must be protected.

You comparing free speech to Hitler’s speech shows you have no idea what free speech entails.

Regarding shouting Pakistan zindabad, anyone who resorts to violence is a loon and mentally unstable. It does not deserve physical violence. But anyone who abuses him without threatening life must also be taken in stride. If there is a law banning some statements or slogans, they should be followed or work to amend the law or vote for the party that allows it.

Debates are always good. Violence is not an answer. It leads to anarchy and social unrest. Exactly what some forces do to destabilize a country. Haters are everywhere. Everyone wants power. They cannot debate stoop to any level to achieve it.
 
The guy was pro gun and claimed Palestinians didn’t exist, blamed them for their destruction. Divisive rhetoric makes you an open target. Nobody is safe now. The right wing loons are going to crazy in America.
Palestine exists. West bank is Palestine illegally occupied by Zionist terrorists. Guess who does nt exist anymore.. Charlie Kirk
 
Charlie Kirk was an anti-Islam guy. He was also against many other groups. He was a right-wing white supremacist pretty much.
.
I was just pointing out he made many enemies and angered many different groups. He was a right-wing white supremacist fella.
.
He was also a white supremacist and an anti-Islam guy. Check below:
.
The more I dig deep regarding Charlie Kirk, the more he comes off as a scumbag.
.
Ironically, he died from what he preached.
.
It seems like he was cheering for Palestinian deaths. He himself is now dead.

I can't feel sorry for this man. He was not a good man.
.
I hope they will not be heartless like their father (who supported Palestinian deaths and gun violence deaths in America)
.

This thread has barely 35 posts yet 1/4rth of the posts are by you @sweep_shot

He did no crime other than debates. You could have opened other thread on his debates yet, all you do is trying to justify your lack of sympathy and hatred for him.

We all have people that we don't like. But we don't intend for their death. Neither we cheer for them.

You claim you don't like political violence yet you couldn't control your glee when you repeatedly post the same thing about a dead guy, who is just a debater and doesn't even hold any power.

This is the closet case of an Islamist who doesn't like free speech hut only cares about Islam and likes to be in a Western nation yet criticizes it day-in and day-out, wanting to import Islamist values. The very thing Charlie Kirk fought for. There is nothing wrong if someone wants to protect their own countries values first and yet, they are labelled as all sorts of things.
He is not even remotely close to how much of an extremist some people on PP are or on social media.

He openly debated with logic similarly to Mehdi Hasan. While I dont agree with Mehdi, all he does is debate and there is no reason to hate him.

People like these should be cherished. They are not propagating hate speech by giving blanket statements but promoting freedom of speech by welcoming questions and debate.
 
He did defend Gaza Genocide by calling it war.. its not speech , its spewing hatred and getting some in return
There is a war going on in Gaza and Hamas is still fighting. They have not surrendered yet and they still hold hostages from Oct 7.
If Hamas surrenders, drops their weapons and Israel still bombs them, then it is genocide. Civilian casualties are happening on both sides. A lot more on Gazans side.

Even Qatar is now asking Hamas to surrender and accept US backed ceasefire. Hamas has so far proven that they do not care about Gazans.
 
This is when one gets the darkest thoughts. This is not just a random guy shooting. To target Charlie Kirk in front of hundreds of camera in the open: this is public execution. This is sending a message. I don't know what the message is yet but how people now are losing their mind on both sides I fear there will be another target but from the left.
Maybe an up an coming problematic leftist candidate? And people will be led to believe that this is a retaliation. The way this was carried out is not random. It is scary and the outcome is even more scary . This is terrible.

- Bassem Yousaf.
 
There is a war going on in Gaza and Hamas is still fighting. They have not surrendered yet and they still hold hostages from Oct 7.
If Hamas surrenders, drops their weapons and Israel still bombs them, then it is genocide. Civilian casualties are happening on both sides. A lot more on Gazans side.

Even Qatar is now asking Hamas to surrender and accept US backed ceasefire. Hamas has so far proven that they do not care about Gazans.

🤡

You reincarnated quickly into Kirk
 
Hamas surrendering is a death sentence. We have seen what the Israelis have done to Hamas in their prisons. They have been raped.

There are also hundreds of Palestinians including children in Israeli prisons without trial. These are hostages.
 
This is when one gets the darkest thoughts. This is not just a random guy shooting. To target Charlie Kirk in front of hundreds of camera in the open: this is public execution. This is sending a message. I don't know what the message is yet but how people now are losing their mind on both sides I fear there will be another target but from the left.
Maybe an up an coming problematic leftist candidate? And people will be led to believe that this is a retaliation. The way this was carried out is not random. It is scary and the outcome is even more scary . This is terrible.

- Bassem Yousaf.

A democrat politician was shot and killed recently also. Similar style.

I didn't see @Champ_Pal saying anything at that time. He didn't condemn that shooting. I wonder why. :inti

Here was the incident: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_shootings_of_Minnesota_legislators.
 
As long as the speech is not asking for genocide or killing an individual or group, all kinds of criticisms must be protected.

You comparing free speech to Hitler’s speech shows you have no idea what free speech entails.

Regarding shouting Pakistan zindabad, anyone who resorts to violence is a loon and mentally unstable. It does not deserve physical violence. But anyone who abuses him without threatening life must also be taken in stride. If there is a law banning some statements or slogans, they should be followed or work to amend the law or vote for the party that allows it.

Debates are always good. Violence is not an answer. It leads to anarchy and social unrest. Exactly what some forces do to destabilize a country. Haters are everywhere. Everyone wants power. They cannot debate stoop to any level to achieve it.
A whole load of nothing, free speech has limits. Respect for all or no one.

Unrestricted speech doesn’t exist anywhere, difficult to enforce.

Charlie Kirk said all kinds of things about black people and slavery unchecked. Elon Musk thought he was being a free speech advocate until somebody started burning his Tesla’s.

Free speech can’t mask people’s bigotry as Mr Kirk found out.
 
US conservative figure and MAGA supporter that engages with college students at campuses has been shot dead by a shooter at a college campus event.

Shocking news since I have seen a fair few of Kirk’s videos. I didn’t like the guy but this was horrific. I also saw the video and it was horrible, wouldn’t recommend it. He was shot in neck and there was a lot of blood.

===

Charlie Kirk, a conservative activist and close ally of President Donald Trump who played an influential role in rallying young Republican voters, was shot and killed Wednesday at a Utah college event in what the governor called a political assassination carried out from a rooftop. A person of interest was in custody, officials said.

“This is a dark day for our state. It’s a tragic day for our nation,” said Utah Gov. Spencer Cox. “I want to be very clear this is a political assassination.”

Authorities did not immediately identify the person in custody, a motive or any criminal charges, but the circumstances of the shooting drew renewed attention to an escalating threat of political violence in the United States that in the last several years has cut across the ideological spectrum. The FBI, which investigates such acts, was helping lead the inquiry, though officials said at this point they had no reason to believe a second person was involved.


Absolutely disagree with his views and his thoughts but totally condemn his killing.

My prayers and thoughts are with him family, particularity his wife and his two children at this hour.
 
Political assassination or Islamic execution, whoever did it will burn in hell, so will their supporters. People justifying this here are pure evil.
 
The video was shocking. I genuinely believe that in death we should preserve the legacy of the deceased.

Charlie Bhai spent a lot of time rationalizing and downplaying the death of others. In his honour, I will also respond to his death in a purely mechanical fashion. No need for flowery language.

Today is a sad day for racists, incels and Indians.
 
There is a war going on in Gaza and Hamas is still fighting. They have not surrendered yet and they still hold hostages from Oct 7.
if Israel Stops being occupying force in west bank , There would nt be no Oct 7.

What came first ? Chicken or egg?

Collective punishment is Genocide given the Casualty scale in Gaza and absolutely disproportionate in numbers compared to Hostages.
 
if Israel Stops being occupying force in west bank , There would nt be no Oct 7.

What came first ? Chicken or egg?

Collective punishment is Genocide given the Casualty scale in Gaza and absolutely disproportionate in numbers compared to Hostages.
In other words, current day Israel should cease to exist? That is your solution?
 
Political assassination or Islamic execution, whoever did it will burn in hell, so will their supporters. People justifying this here are pure evil.
Evil are those people who have killed more than 50000 innocent people in Gaza including children and then people like Charlie defending it. His murder is gruesome but there is no love lost here
 
Charlie Kirk was a horrible human being. He was racist, Islamophobe, white supremacist etc.

Not surprised sanghis are defending him. Sanghis defend people like him. :inti

Its not clear who murdered him and what were motives of killer.. But people like charlie tend to create enemies under Garb of Free and unrestricted speech.

He hated Islam , i got no problem with that . But Man was hated by me for his views on Palestine .. According to him , It does nt exist and made funny faces when somebody confronted him about it.
 
Evil are those people who have killed more than 50000 innocent people in Gaza including children and then people like Charlie defending it. His murder is gruesome but there is no love lost here
He defends Israel's right to fight back, and there are sides that defend Palestine's right to attack the occupier. Depending on where you are, both are valid arguments. Israel or Palestine, there are no saints.

Here we are talking someone in America getting killed because he had an opinion and a side in the conflict. You can't even label him a collateral damage because he was nowhere near the warzone.

This sets a dangerous precedent and I hope you realise this. I have seen posters in the forum defend and even celebrate dead bodies/terrorist attacks in Bharat, doesn't mean I'll be jumping in joy if they are shot in the neck tomorrow. You don't kill people over words, period.
 
He defends Israel's right to fight back, and there are sides that defend Palestine's right to attack the occupier. Depending on where you are, both are valid arguments. Israel or Palestine, there are no saints.

Here we are talking someone in America getting killed because he had an opinion and a side in the conflict. You can't even label him a collateral damage because he was nowhere near the warzone.

This sets a dangerous precedent and I hope you realise this. I have seen posters in the forum defend and even celebrate dead bodies/terrorist attacks in Bharat, doesn't mean I'll be jumping in joy if they are shot in the neck tomorrow. You don't kill people over words, period.
how do you know he was killed because of his views on Palestine?

Man was Generally Hated for right reasons
 
how do you know he was killed because of his views on Palestine?

Man was Generally Hated for right reasons
That's not my point. He was killed for having views that were unpopular among a population.

- No one should be killed for this.
- No one should defend such murders.

Anyone who sees what happened to him as karma or justified is sick to the core.
 
Islamists will regret doing this. This was a huge mistake.
Kill anyone who disagrees seem to be a popular theme among them, no wonder this is being defended or celebrated. Classic example of a belief system hijacking ethics and morality.
 
Kill anyone who disagrees seem to be a popular theme among them, no wonder this is being defended or celebrated. Classic example of a belief system hijacking ethics and morality.
again... where did it say or proved that islam has anything to do with this??

Stop watching godi media and provide proofs for these claims...
 
No one should defend such murders.
Exactly

Tell this to mother of Innocent Children in Gaza who were slaughtered and she will say Charlie Defended murder of Her children by calling it consequence of War. Now he ia dead because of consequences of his hate speeches.

Again no love lost.
 
again... where did it say or proved that islam has anything to do with this??

Stop watching godi media and provide proofs for these claims...
That's not even my point if you bother to read the message Bouncer guy. Political or religious or personal grudge, no one deserves to die for having views, do you agree?
 
Its not clear who murdered him and what were motives of killer.. But people like charlie tend to create enemies under Garb of Free and unrestricted speech.

He hated Islam , i got no problem with that . But Man was hated by me for his views on Palestine .. According to him , It does nt exist and made funny faces when somebody confronted him about it.

Yes.

He was against Muslims but also against other groups (like Black Lives Matter, LGBTQ etc.). He made many enemies. At this point, it is not clear why he was killed.

Sanghis are coming up with wild theories as expected. I don't expect anything better from the sanghis. They are lost causes. :inti
 
The culprits of the current Mass Genocide should cease to exist just like the Thousands of innocents who have been subjected to this brutality
Only if pipe dream fantasies came true.

P.S. RIP to all those who have lost their lives in the ongoing war.​
 
His point is unclear

He would nt condemn the Defence of charlie against Mass murder in Gaza but at same time Preaching us not to defend his

We are not defending his murder. We are simply calling Charlie Kirk a scumbag because he really is one. He justified murders of Palestinian civilians and he justified gun violence in America (see post #22).


Sanghis are twisting our words like they always do. We shouldn't expect good things from the sanghis. They are like Charlie Kirk. :inti
 
Exactly

Tell this to mother of Innocent Children in Gaza who were slaughtered and she will say Charlie Defended murder of Her children by calling it consequence of War. Now he ia dead because of consequences of his hate speeches.

Again no love lost.

Poor equivalence there. This murder is like pro-Palestine supporters being killed in the US for supporting Hamas.

Difference of opinion or what you label as "hate speech" shouldn't lead to such murders.

We are two very different people if we can't even agree to this, and fine. All I can do is share my views which I did.
 
He was exactly the majority of people say he was.. a white supremist, racist and pro Zionist.. but this should not have happened.. this will make him a martyr for the racist.
Om shanti
 
You mentioned beliefs bla bla... I condemn this violence but throwing eveyrthing on ISLAM??

shame

There's a greater tendency among Islamists to rejoice attacks on people with anti-Islamic views. I do see this lack of tolerance as a problem among Islamists.@BouncerGuy .

You can let me know if it's a problem and I'll be careful not to express my views as blatantly in future.
 
pro-Palestine supporters being killed in the US for supporting Hamas.

not exactly
He defended Mass murder of a ethnic Group. According to Int Law , Collective punishment is war Crime. And Israel has made it clear that they want Gazans to move ( Ethnic Displacement through use of force ) for all intent and purposes its mass Genocide and Hamas is an excuse

Siding with Palestinians against their Mass Murder is not equivalent to supporting Hamas.
 
Back
Top