What's new

Citizenship Amendment Bill: India's new 'anti-Muslim' law causes uproar

1.Boris is the elected PM of UK. Its you who is a nobody. Look out what he may do to taliban supporters.

2.Such dreams were seen by pakistani leaders, since 1947, while we actually saw the division of pakistan.

Poor you. You have my sympathies.

PM in the UK is not like Modi who will send thugs to butcher Muslims and whose followers rape little girls. Boris or any UK PM can only work within the law, cannot do anything to me and neither will he want to. UK is not Hindutva nation.

Lets see, Muslims in India are waking up now. I support anyone right to self defence, esp those in Kashmir against Indian occupation. :)
 
Now this is embarrassing

Neeche se topper was such a good page but in the middle of this year they started talking against women , Sachin and supporting BJP, had to unlike them and their sister pages on fb.

Al though i do believe there are 4-5 ppl running that page but don’t think anyone is Muslim..
 
Last edited:
PM in the UK is not like Modi who will send thugs to butcher Muslims and whose followers rape little girls. Boris or any UK PM can only work within the law, cannot do anything to me and neither will he want to. UK is not Hindutva nation.

Lets see, Muslims in India are waking up now. I support anyone right to self defence, esp those in Kashmir against Indian occupation. :)

PM in UK will deal with the extremist in UK. He will not fear anyone.

Muslims in India rejected the advise of pakistanis with utter disdain.

Supporting terrorist groups is a crime.
 
Funniest thing, RSS/BJP supporters/members are labeling Muslims as Taliban.

Let that sink in, RSS/BJP, the radicalized Hindu nationalists, a party that is hate driven against one particular group is labeling Muslims as Taliban just because Muslims are calling them out for what RSS/BJP is.

Ah, you can label just about everybody, but some other supporters cannot. Move over the labels, and talk about the substance. Illegal migration is a big issue for all countries and India is also one of them. Likes of Manata, Manmohan have spoken about this problem but now have conveniently changed for vote-bank politics. And just like Pakistan who are overly concerned of India's minorities. India CAB is , to assist minorities of neighboring countries with a state religion. It's all about giving citizenship, and taking away none.

When it comes to PP & Modi, it's all about Godwin's law. But above the label, the facts and reality don't support your thinking....
 
PM in UK will deal with the extremist in UK. He will not fear anyone.

Muslims in India rejected the advise of pakistanis with utter disdain.

Supporting terrorist groups is a crime.

Kashmiris are freedom fighters. Now the Muslim youth of India are protesting and this wont stop.

Dont worry about the Uk, the thread is about 3rd world India. Dont be stupid to compare. :)
 
Neeche se topper was such a good page but in the middle of this year they started talking against women , Sachin and supporting BJP, had to unlike them and their sister pages on fb.

Al though i do believe there are 4-5 ppl running that page but don’t think anyone is Muslim..

oh i see. I just noticed PIB India's official account posted disappointment over what Delhi Police is doing in Jamia and within few minutes the tweet was deleted and an apology was posted saying there was an error and action is taken so i guess the guy who posted it lost his job already.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">A member of our Social Media team inadvertently tweeted from the <a href="https://twitter.com/PIB_India?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@PIB_India</a> handle her personal comments on the situation in Jamia Millia. The error is deeply regretted. Suitable action is being taken.</p>— PIB India (@PIB_India) <a href="https://twitter.com/PIB_India/status/1206256116256006144?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 15, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Here is the screenshot of the tweet that is deleted now.

EL1_H1VVAAAqvNZ
 
Third class bill supported by third class people. We are suppressing our own people for refugees. Brilliant.
 
Third class bill supported by third class people. We are suppressing our own people for refugees. Brilliant.

A bill which doesn't concern any Indian citizens. Instead, provides assistance to minorities who have suffered under Islamic states. A welcome bill, while you are only doing fear-mongering....
 
A bill which doesn't concern any Indian citizens. Instead, provides assistance to minorities who have suffered under Islamic states. A welcome bill, while you are only doing fear-mongering....

You mean to implement this bill all over India.
 
So?

Why should illegal immigration from BD and Pakistan be allowed? They got a country in 1947. Didnt they?

Coz India doesn't believe in two nation theory, giving into the bill would prove that. That's all everything is other than that its nothing.

This is a terrible bill, also lets not forget Pakistan and BD would have ego issues if Muslims even filed for citizenship in India, so this is a political bill, religion shouldn't be an issue.

Either India believes in two nation theory or not this is up for that, BJP(sister Parties) and Muslim League do believe in the two nation theory , they always have and everyone knows that, question is which side are BJP supporters going to be on and you are clearly choosing a wrong side but thats your opinion, if students and other states refuse to accept this and protest, govn has to deal with this.
 
Third class bill supported by third class people. We are suppressing our own people for refugees. Brilliant.

The bill is required but without discrimination, there are Sikhs and Hindus,Afghan Muslims in Delhi waiting for 20-30 years to get citizenship, that's unfair to them, either shouldn't had been allowed but were allowed then citizenship should be given now.
 
Coz India doesn't believe in two nation theory, giving into the bill would prove that. That's all everything is other than that its nothing.

This is a terrible bill, also lets not forget Pakistan and BD would have ego issues if Muslims even filed for citizenship in India, so this is a political bill, religion shouldn't be an issue.

Either India believes in two nation theory or not this is up for that, BJP(sister Parties) and Muslim League do believe in the two nation theory , they always have and everyone knows that, question is which side are BJP supporters going to be on and you are clearly choosing a wrong side but thats your opinion, if students and other states refuse to accept this and protest, govn has to deal with this.


So you mean to say partition didnot happen? Or since congress tries to wash it, its not a reality?

Two nation theory is the truth. Partition hapened. Muslims took a country and they will have to live there. Thats the truth, thats the law, thats what was agreed in 1947.

Whats there to not believe? This is not a dharmashala. In 47 i wanted pakistan so i went there, now i want India. 70 years after i will say i cannot live with hindus so i will ask for some land and if not given, i will riot. This isnt happening again.

Dont try to paste the Nehruvian leftist propoganda tha two nation theory is false etc etc. Its the reality,accept it and move accordingly.

Students? You mean asection of students who are muslims?

Law says, citizenship is a union subject, so a law passed by parliament has to be applied. No option.
 
The bill is required but without discrimination, there are Sikhs and Hindus,Afghan Muslims in Delhi waiting for 20-30 years to get citizenship, that's unfair to them, either shouldn't had been allowed but were allowed then citizenship should be given now.

So we give them a country in 1947, now we take them in as citizens also. Why?

Are they going to bring back the proportional land abd resources back?


No way muslims from Pakistan and BD be ever given citizenship like other refugees.
 
So you mean to say partition didnot happen? Or since congress tries to wash it, its not a reality?

Two nation theory is the truth. Partition hapened. Muslims took a country and they will have to live there. Thats the truth, thats the law, thats what was agreed in 1947.

Whats there to not believe? This is not a dharmashala. In 47 i wanted pakistan so i went there, now i want India. 70 years after i will say i cannot live with hindus so i will ask for some land and if not given, i will riot. This isnt happening again.

Dont try to paste the Nehruvian leftist propoganda tha two nation theory is false etc etc. Its the reality,accept it and move accordingly.

Students? You mean asection of students who are muslims?

Law says, citizenship is a union subject, so a law passed by parliament has to be applied. No option.

Are you saying its the same people who went to Afghanistan ,Pak and BD I'm sure they are old and they don't want to travel, these are diff people. Two nation theory is not a reality, Its one nation and a section of them wanted a diff country they went there.

India's stand is we don't accept two nation theory but clearly BJP has a different stand, Partition did happen which is the truth many lived through it, question is why does it matter now, we are our own country and our rules and laws have to be just.

Also if there was 100% efficiency of this NRC which isn't there, there is no way that this will not be mishandled , which as shown before.

Our policies now cannot be a reference to situation of past, that's like saying never trade with UK now, never play cricket anymore, don't have parliamentary democracy.
 
So we give them a country in 1947, now we take them in as citizens also. Why?

Are they going to bring back the proportional land abd resources back?


No way muslims from Pakistan and BD be ever given citizenship like other refugees.

Yeah but Afghans aren't being given either and we allowed them to be refugees. No they are not bringing any resources similar to how Tibetans didn't.

No one is saying to allow illegal refugees, allow them legally, case by case.

Also we didn't give them a country, British did but we still trade them and as you told me you have family living in UK now maybe you should remind them what BRitish did and what holding BRitish passport means, if history matters that much.
 
Are you saying its the same people who went to Afghanistan ,Pak and BD I'm sure they are old and they don't want to travel, these are diff people. Two nation theory is not a reality, Its one nation and a section of them wanted a diff country they went there.

India's stand is we don't accept two nation theory but clearly BJP has a different stand, Partition did happen which is the truth many lived through it, question is why does it matter now, we are our own country and our rules and laws have to be just.

Also if there was 100% efficiency of this NRC which isn't there, there is no way that this will not be mishandled , which as shown before.

Our policies now cannot be a reference to situation of past, that's like saying never trade with UK now, never play cricket anymore, don't have parliamentary democracy.

Same people or their offsprings, doesn't matter. If they have a problem, talk to their elders. Its not our fault that their elders fought and rioted to get a nation. And we will not make it our problem either.

Law says,India and Pakistan are two separate nation states.

India doesnt accept two nation theory? India recognizes pakistan as a separate nation. Same with BD.

It absolutely matters. Those who demanded partition and went to pakistan they and their generations are not welcome here.Millions of families like mine didnot make huge sacrifices to come to India,so that we have to again one day live with the people who forced us to make those sacrifices.

Will those who come back bring with them proportional land and resource back,? What is the guarantee that 50 years after they will not demand anothe partition? This country will not be run by whims of what a minority community think. A decision was made in 1947 and thats that.

Those who dont learn from the past, will suffer like they did in the past. And we will not. So we will keep the proponents of partition out.
 
Same people or their offsprings, doesn't matter. If they have a problem, talk to their elders. Its not our fault that their elders fought and rioted to get a nation. And we will not make it our problem either.

Law says,India and Pakistan are two separate nation states.

India doesnt accept two nation theory? India recognizes pakistan as a separate nation. Same with BD.

It absolutely matters. Those who demanded partition and went to pakistan they and their generations are not welcome here.Millions of families like mine didnot make huge sacrifices to come to India,so that we have to again one day live with the people who forced us to make those sacrifices.

Will those who come back bring with them proportional land and resource back,? What is the guarantee that 50 years after they will not demand anothe partition? This country will not be run by whims of what a minority community think. A decision was made in 1947 and thats that.

Those who dont learn from the past, will suffer like they did in the past. And we will not. So we will keep the proponents of partition out.

Also in your logic what about non Muslims in those countries that decided to stay there? My grandparents made a choice to come to India, what if they do approve of anyone coming from there?

AnyhowI give up bro u r right, we will wait a central Shankaraya Charya making laws for us jus because Pakistan was formed just because other religions exist.
 
Yeah but Afghans aren't being given either and we allowed them to be refugees. No they are not bringing any resources similar to how Tibetans didn't.

No one is saying to allow illegal refugees, allow them legally, case by case.

Also we didn't give them a country, British did but we still trade them and as you told me you have family living in UK now maybe you should remind them what BRitish did and what holding BRitish passport means, if history matters that much.

Do you know how porous is the Durand line? Any idea?

Did tibetans partition India and take land snd resources? Or did they kill non tibetan indians to get their land?

Such legslly case by case is allowed for all. Just they are not allowed as refugees.

The family i have in UK, used to live in east pakistan. They didnt migrate to India in 47. Guess what, a number of them were killed in 71. They came and stayed with us till 1973-74. The men slowly returned,sold their huge properties and businesses at a discounted rate and then came to India and slowly migrated out to UK.

I remember them, thats why i want the CAB.
 
Do you know how porous is the Durand line? Any idea?

Did tibetans partition India and take land snd resources? Or did they kill non tibetan indians to get their land?

Such legslly case by case is allowed for all. Just they are not allowed as refugees.

The family i have in UK, used to live in east pakistan. They didnt migrate to India in 47. Guess what, a number of them were killed in 71. They came and stayed with us till 1973-74. The men slowly returned,sold their huge properties and businesses at a discounted rate and then came to India and slowly migrated out to UK.

I remember them, thats why i want the CAB.

Maybe its time to not allow citizens of UK , they ruled over us and these Indians/Hindus going there and taking up those passports are traitors.

India should investigate them too and not go and appease them in Wembley?Since history matters you agree then, coz we should remember the past as you said..
 
Also in your logic what about non Muslims in those countries that decided to stay there? My grandparents made a choice to come to India, what if they do approve of anyone coming from there?

AnyhowI give up bro u r right, we will wait a central Shankaraya Charya making laws for us jus because Pakistan was formed just because other religions exist.

What about non muslims? Well have you read the Nehru Liaquat pact?

The non Muslims never got a say. Suddenly one day in 1947 they became second class citizens in an islsmic republic.

They were persecuted. Instead of setting the matter, Nehru signed a pact. Pakistan never implemented it.

Its time to settle that historic wrong.

Why will Shankaracharya make laws? Stop dragging in religion when you csnnot make an argument.
 
Maybe its time to not allow citizens of UK , they ruled over us and these Indians/Hindus going there and taking up those passports are traitors.

India should investigate them too and not go and appease them in Wembley?Since history matters you agree then, coz we should remember the past as you said..

Did UK did all this in the name of a religion?
 
Punjabi Hindus and Sikhs are the ones that suffered the most and we have all others except them in North making these laws.
[MENTION=2099]Cricket[/MENTION]joshilla to give you an idea you had a family in East , none for me in west you should know why , the migration was complete and brutal.
 
Punjabi Hindus and Sikhs are the ones that suffered the most and we have all others except them in North making these laws.

[MENTION=2099]Cricket[/MENTION]joshilla to give you an idea you had a family in East , none for me in west you should know why , the migration was complete and brutal.

Punjabis Sikhs and hindus in Eastern punjab made sure that the partition was completed. Hardly in muslim population in there.

Also hindu population in East was much higher. Around 30 per cent or so.

Leave partition. Read Noakhali riots. And what Gandhi said.
 
In the name of nationalism, thats why am not saying don’t allow christians of UK, but whole of UK and its citizens.

UK didnot start a religious persecution regime. Its policy of imperalism were similar for everyone, through out countries and continents.

Secondly Brits were foreigners, not my next door neighbour who fine day started killimg me and raping my women because i was not of his religion.
 
UK didnot start a religious persecution regime. Its policy of imperalism were similar for everyone, through out countries and continents.

Secondly Brits were foreigners, not my next door neighbour who fine day started killimg me and raping my women because i was not of his religion.

So you do agree they were not invaders but our neighbors...and most still are.. you seem to have one reasoning for everything..
 
UK didnot start a religious persecution regime. Its policy of imperalism were similar for everyone, through out countries and continents.

Secondly Brits were foreigners, not my next door neighbour who fine day started killimg me and raping my women because i was not of his religion.

Do you actually believe the stuff you write? Do you think Muslims randomly started raping and killing one day. If you are talking about the partition, violence happened on both sides, innocents on both sides were killed. How deluded do you have to be to think all Muslims were criminals while the other side was filled with innocent angels.

Anyways I don’t think there is any point of this because you seem to have an irrational hatred for all Muslims. Grow up and try to get rid of the hate.
 
Do you actually believe the stuff you write? Do you think Muslims randomly started raping and killing one day. If you are talking about the partition, violence happened on both sides, innocents on both sides were killed. How deluded do you have to be to think all Muslims were criminals while the other side was filled with innocent angels.

Anyways I don’t think there is any point of this because you seem to have an irrational hatred for all Muslims. Grow up and try to get rid of the hate.

There is a proverb in malayalam “ Pothinodu vedham odhiyitu karyalla”.

Literal meaning : There is no point in reciting Vedha to a buffalo.:)
 
So you do agree they were not invaders but our neighbors...and most still are.. you seem to have one reasoning for everything..

They were. They decided to violently fight for a country. They got one. Now they are not welcome here.
 
Do you actually believe the stuff you write? Do you think Muslims randomly started raping and killing one day. If you are talking about the partition, violence happened on both sides, innocents on both sides were killed. How deluded do you have to be to think all Muslims were criminals while the other side was filled with innocent angels.

Anyways I don’t think there is any point of this because you seem to have an irrational hatred for all Muslims. Grow up and try to get rid of the hate.

My family lived through this. So i know what happened.

Such was the violence in Noakhali that Gandhi said, Hindus must leave or perish.

I am not concerned what happened on both sides. Non Muslims are not trying to go to pakistan.

Do not say muslims. Plenty of them live in India. Many i grew up with.

This is what happened in east pakistan and therebis no way millions of us who escaped that place will ever allow the perpetrators or their generation to make India their home.
 
There is a proverb in malayalam “ Pothinodu vedham odhiyitu karyalla”.

Literal meaning : There is no point in reciting Vedha to a buffalo.:)

As i said sister,. Keralites will never understand what partition was and what it meant to the families who went through it.

Why this support for pakistani and BD muslims?

Why this failure to understand what non Muslims went through?
 
My family lived through this. So i know what happened.

Such was the violence in Noakhali that Gandhi said, Hindus must leave or perish.

I am not concerned what happened on both sides. Non Muslims are not trying to go to pakistan.

Do not say muslims. Plenty of them live in India. Many i grew up with.

This is what happened in east pakistan and therebis no way millions of us who escaped that place will ever allow the perpetrators or their generation to make India their home.

Do you think your family is the only one that lived through this? Majority of the people at that time had to deal with the violence. I honestly don’t care that much about the news in India but you need to stop with your narrative that Muslims were the only perpetrators at the time of partition..

It’s unfortunate what happened to your family but plenty of Muslim families were displaced, killed and forced to leave their homes as well. So like I said it’s your country so support this new law all you want but don’t delude yourself by thinking that Muslims were some sort of heartless creatures who randomly started killing everyone because they wanted a new country.
 
Justifying bigoted and racist views out of vendetta for something that most of us not even born yet.

Quite amazing to see a thought process of some of the educated ones.
 
Playing right into BJP's hands, they will easily win the next election over this... RIP Bangladeshi illegal immigrants.. Nothing much, if anything at all the protesting minorities can do, they are overwhelmed by a 800 + million hindu majority of India.. It seems Modi govt is taking inspiration from Jinnah himself, Jinnah set the precedent...
 
Can't be a coincident with BJP leader making this statement 5 years ago. Seems like it was planned by BJP since. With all this happening in India. First the Kashmir Article 370 issue, then CAB and the way they handling Muslims.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">BJP leader Rajeshwar Singh says Islam and Christianity will be finished in India by 2021.<br><br>This is a member of India's ruling party openly boasting of his government's intent to ethnically cleanse 200 million Muslims and 28 million Christians. <a href="https://t.co/TRMPdhosYE">pic.twitter.com/TRMPdhosYE</a></p>— CJ Werleman (@cjwerleman) <a href="https://twitter.com/cjwerleman/status/1178758112058073088?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 30, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Playing right into BJP's hands, they will easily win the next election over this... RIP Bangladeshi illegal immigrants.. Nothing much, if anything at all the protesting minorities can do, they are overwhelmed by a 800 + million hindu majority of India.. It seems Modi govt is taking inspiration from Jinnah himself, Jinnah set the precedent...

1bn hindu majority. Plus the Christians Sikhs Jains etc have no issue with the CAB.

Bjp may have set the road for its victory in bengal as well.

Delhi Elections are only cpl of months away. Lets see what happens.
 
1bn hindu majority. Plus the Christians Sikhs Jains etc have no issue with the CAB.

Bjp may have set the road for its victory in bengal as well.

Delhi Elections are only cpl of months away. Lets see what happens.

BJP winning in Bengal would be huge, Karnataka entry is just an appetiser. If I had a choice of BJP winning in Kerala or Bengal, as much as I would hate to do it, I would pick Bengal. Kerala with it's ISIS and Wahabi extremism on the rise is still a lesser threat to the country than Mamta Banerjee, she is another Italian Gandhi, working against the country's interest, she must be taken out without delay...
 
Justifying bigoted and racist views out of vendetta for something that most of us not even born yet.

Quite amazing to see a thought process of some of the educated ones.

Education has nothing to do with it.
 
BJP winning in Bengal would be huge, Karnataka entry is just an appetiser. If I had a choice of BJP winning in Kerala or Bengal, as much as I would hate to do it, I would pick Bengal. Kerala with it's ISIS and Wahabi extremism on the rise is still a lesser threat to the country than Mamta Banerjee, she is another Italian Gandhi, working against the country's interest, she must be taken out without delay...

Press Trust of India (@PTI_News) Tweeted:
Just because few trains were set on fire, Centre has stopped railway services in most parts of Bengal: Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee at Kolkata rally https://twitter.com/PTI_News/status/1206501137060253696?s=20

Momta didi at it again. :uakmal
 
BJP winning in Bengal would be huge, Karnataka entry is just an appetiser. If I had a choice of BJP winning in Kerala or Bengal, as much as I would hate to do it, I would pick Bengal. Kerala with it's ISIS and Wahabi extremism on the rise is still a lesser threat to the country than Mamta Banerjee, she is another Italian Gandhi, working against the country's interest, she must be taken out without delay...

Keralites are almost all Indians. They can be reasoned with. Made to understand national interests.

Problem is these illegal infiltrators.
 
Ah, you can label just about everybody, but some other supporters cannot. Move over the labels, and talk about the substance. Illegal migration is a big issue for all countries and India is also one of them. Likes of Manata, Manmohan have spoken about this problem but now have conveniently changed for vote-bank politics. And just like Pakistan who are overly concerned of India's minorities. India CAB is , to assist minorities of neighboring countries with a state religion. It's all about giving citizenship, and taking away none.

When it comes to PP & Modi, it's all about Godwin's law. But above the label, the facts and reality don't support your thinking....

What do you call a radicalized religious extremists in your country?

what do you call a person who ran their politics by perverting a religion?

What do you call a person and political party that openly say to marginalize a particular group and that group should be subservient or else.

You can suggest the label and i'd use that if that would make you little happy.

rest is rant and justification of hate for particular group of people. carry on.
 
the xenophobia from Indian posters is really nauseating and laughable at the same time.

illegal muslim bangladeshis flooding into Assam/Tripura lol. it would have made slightly more sense if they mentioned illegal migration to major urban centers like Delhi/Mumbai or even Kolkata. But no..These poor people are going for better life in the rich and prosperous regions of Assam and Tripura.

yes, there are illegal migration from BD but to countries like Italy, Libya, Morocco and other places in Europe. But it is laughable how the Indians thinks that we are all rushing to go into shiny and affluent NE region.

This bill is just to strip the rights of local Indian Muslims and dilute their voting power.

I know the ultra nationalistic Indian swill come in and argue at no end. But I have better things to do. I don't know what satisfaction they get by inflating their own faux superiority over Bangladeshis and Pakistanis.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="da" dir="ltr">India under Modi <a href="https://t.co/VWHFKFPX4k">pic.twitter.com/VWHFKFPX4k</a></p>— Alfons López Tena (@alfonslopeztena) <a href="https://twitter.com/alfonslopeztena/status/1206557161712738304?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 16, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
the xenophobia from Indian posters is really nauseating and laughable at the same time.

illegal muslim bangladeshis flooding into Assam/Tripura lol. it would have made slightly more sense if they mentioned illegal migration to major urban centers like Delhi/Mumbai or even Kolkata. But no..These poor people are going for better life in the rich and prosperous regions of Assam and Tripura.

yes, there are illegal migration from BD but to countries like Italy, Libya, Morocco and other places in Europe. But it is laughable how the Indians thinks that we are all rushing to go into shiny and affluent NE region.

This bill is just to strip the rights of local Indian Muslims and dilute their voting power.

I know the ultra nationalistic Indian swill come in and argue at no end. But I have better things to do. I don't know what satisfaction they get by inflating their own faux superiority over Bangladeshis and Pakistanis.

Can you tell me the top 3 countries from where Bangladeshis send the maximum remittance back to Bangladesh?
 
Mamta Banerjee speaking against CAB and a rally too, since i was informed yesterday what elected politicians of the respected states represent the people of the state looks like Bengalis don’t support you [MENTION=76058]cricketjoshila[/MENTION]
 
Mamta Banerjee speaking against CAB and a rally too, since i was informed yesterday what elected politicians of the respected states represent the people of the state looks like Bengalis don’t support you [MENTION=76058]cricketjoshila[/MENTION]

Looks like Bengal is opposing this bill.

EL6G-4eW4AAM3sQ
 
Looks like Bengal is opposing this bill.

EL6G-4eW4AAM3sQ

Yes and now he will say she and the elected politicians are not representing Bengal, but when southern Politicians who are ally of BJP do then we would get they represent South Indian people and I’m spreading lies.

Eventhough honest answer is that most Bengalis probably support this.
 
Last edited:
Mamta Banerjee speaking against CAB and a rally too, since i was informed yesterday what elected politicians of the respected states represent the people of the state looks like Bengalis don’t support you [MENTION=76058]cricketjoshila[/MENTION]

Well thats fine. She is within her rights to get act either struck down by SC or repealed by the parliament.
 
Yes and now he will say she and the elected politicians are not representing Bengal, but when southern Politicians who are ally of BJP do then we would get they represent South Indian people and I’m spreading lies.

Eventhough honest answer is that most Bengalis probably support this.

Whether bengalis support or they dont will be known in 18 months.

But majority of the peoples representatives support this.
 
Well thats fine. She is within her rights to get act either struck down by SC or repealed by the parliament.

But does she and other elected ones represent Bengalis ? Like South Indian politicians represent South Indians?
 
Whether bengalis support or they dont will be known in 18 months.

But majority of the peoples representatives support this.

Similar to how South supports or not will be known in next elections.. so that point that elected politicians represent the population is not true?
 
But does she and other elected ones represent Bengalis ? Like South Indian politicians represent South Indians?


Well she is the elected representative of Bengal, even if i dont like her, she is by law my chief minister and represnts my state and i will abide by that law.
 
Similar to how South supports or not will be known in next elections.. so that point that elected politicians represent the population is not true?

Bjp just won the Karnataka by polls. TRS and YSRCP govt are hardly a year old.
 
Similar to how South supports or not will be known in next elections.. so that point that elected politicians represent the population is not true?

Even if there is a referendum, this law will pass. What do you think?
 
Well she is the elected representative of Bengal, even if i dont like her, she is by law my chief minister and represnts my state and i will abide by that law.

Fair so Bengalis are not supporting it. Good to know..and AIADMK will be out of power too..
 
Fair so Bengalis are not supporting it. Good to know..and AIADMK will be out of power too..

If the law is repealed fair and square by the next govt in center, thats fine with me.

I cannot accept one govt because its favourable to my ideas and then reject the other govt because its opposite to mine. Thats not how it works.
 
If the law is repealed fair and square by the next govt in center, thats fine with me.

I cannot accept one govt because its favourable to my ideas and then reject the other govt because its opposite to mine. Thats not how it works.

Fair.. I’m bookmarking this for all future legislations.
I don’t believe in that.. just like electoral bonds I don’t.
 
Keralites are almost all Indians. They can be reasoned with. Made to understand national interests.

No they cant, as a person from that state, I can guarantee you they cant. The hindus there are ignorant, they do not understand the dangers that lurk around them. For the avg hindu of kerala, they feel people of all faiths are all equal and same. This falls right into the hands of the muslims and christians there, for them from the Abhrahamic faith's their religion is better than anyone else's. Although things are slowly starting to change with the malayalee hindus, anyway this is a conversation for a later date....

Problem is these illegal infiltrators.

Absolutely, We have to stop Bangladeshi illegal migrants at all costs, Mamta should be target no.1

..
 
Look up my post before 2014. My posts about my country has not changed.

I hope the world is more hospitable to Indians once climate change ravages the subcontinent.

Would your perspective change when it is you or your loved ones seeking refuge?

Or are you hoping for a non-Muslim exemption?
 
I hope the world is more hospitable to Indians once climate change ravages the subcontinent.

Would your perspective change when it is you or your loved ones seeking refuge?

Or are you hoping for a non-Muslim exemption?

My grandfather already left his home in 1946, due to Muslims he had known all his life. He was accepted by non muslims who hardly knew him.

If not for the fact that we had houses and business in Kolkata, we would be on the streets.

When climate change will ravage my country it remains to be seen, illegal immigrants are doing it today.
 
Outside your fantasy world, there is a huge diaspora of illegal Indians in all countries of the world. They are regularly in news for illegally crossing US/Mexican border, trying to cross into Norway from Russia, getting into Europe via Morocco. Add to this the fake students (google news abt Fake Univ trap in the US) and H1b fraudsters, you will see the real picture of their desperation.

If you ever get a chance to visit a prosperous nation you will realise that the indian illegal immigrants hugely outnumber all others (including the ones from war torn places like Syria and Iraq). There must be a reason to this.
 
Outside your fantasy world, there is a huge diaspora of illegal Indians in all countries of the world. They are regularly in news for illegally crossing US/Mexican border, trying to cross into Norway from Russia, getting into Europe via Morocco. Add to this the fake students (google news abt Fake Univ trap in the US) and H1b fraudsters, you will see the real picture of their desperation.

If you ever get a chance to visit a prosperous nation you will realise that the indian illegal immigrants hugely outnumber all others (including the ones from war torn places like Syria and Iraq). There must be a reason to this.

If there are illegal indian immigrants then they should be dealt with as per the law of that country. I have no issues.

I have visited quiet a few countries in Europe. The most i have found are illegal Bangladeshis.
 
Broadband services have resumed today from around 9 AM. Mobile internet still remains suspended. As a result food delivery agents and cab drivers are still suffering. Cab drivers in my city are protesting today because of that. And no more curfew hours in my city anymore from today.
 
Broadband services have resumed today from around 9 AM. Mobile internet still remains suspended. As a result food delivery agents and cab drivers are still suffering. Cab drivers in my city are protesting today because of that. And no more curfew hours in my city anymore from today.

Hitman school,offices,shopes are closed?
 
Broadband services have resumed today from around 9 AM. Mobile internet still remains suspended. As a result food delivery agents and cab drivers are still suffering. Cab drivers in my city are protesting today because of that. And no more curfew hours in my city anymore from today.

Isnt mobile internet supposed to restored from today evening?

Btw Hitman can you tell our friends here if Assamese are protesting in support of muslim immigrants?
 
Isnt mobile internet supposed to restored from today evening?

Btw Hitman can you tell our friends here if Assamese are protesting in support of muslim immigrants?

Nothing has been decided on mobile internet yet. It's possible that it might remain suspended for a few more days, or maybe get restored today itself.

No, they were and are still protesting against the CAB (now CAA). No more violence anymore now though. They are completely against all illegal immigrants.
 
Nothing has been decided on mobile internet yet. It's possible that it might remain suspended for a few more days, or maybe get restored today itself.

No, they were and are still protesting against the CAB (now CAA). No more violence anymore now though. They are completely against all illegal immigrants.

So the Assamese dont care if its Muslims or hindus as long as they are illegal immigrants? Right?
 
Coz India doesn't believe in two nation theory, giving into the bill would prove that. That's all everything is other than that its nothing.

This is a terrible bill, also lets not forget Pakistan and BD would have ego issues if Muslims even filed for citizenship in India, so this is a political bill, religion shouldn't be an issue.

Either India believes in two nation theory or not this is up for that, BJP(sister Parties) and Muslim League do believe in the two nation theory , they always have and everyone knows that, question is which side are BJP supporters going to be on and you are clearly choosing a wrong side but thats your opinion, if students and other states refuse to accept this and protest, govn has to deal with this.
Two nation theory became a reality in 1947. Nearly 90% Muslims voted for it. In 1946 Muslim League won 425 of 496 seats reserved for muslims with 89.2% votes. ML fought election on promise of creation of Pakistan.
After partition there should have been a complete exchange of hindu and muslim population which didn't happen all thanks to Congress party.
Congress allowed Muslims to stay in India despite the fact that they wanted Pakistan, they also abandoned the non muslim population in Pakistan despite them being against the idea of Pakistan!
Nehru and Gandhi went in denial mode of a jilted lover where one believes that the girl (muslims) still loves them and they can win them over. Movies like Ranjhanaa, Awargi (1990) etc. comes to mind regarding this.

Muslims stayed in India because they were never persecuted whereas their hindu counterparts in neighborhood countries got a different treatment.

Hindus ended up being the losers in the whole mess called partition. They lost big part of their motherland and ended up sharing the remaining part with the same people who asked for the partition! They were put on strong anesthesia called Nehruvian secularism ( putting minorities ahead and adjusting to their whims and fancies). The anesthesia lasted for nearly 60 years but it is running out now.
CAA is a step to correct the mistake of the past by allowing Hindus and other minorities which were left to fend for themselves in a islamic state post partition.
Anyone who is indulging in violence during protests should be dealt with brute force irrespective of their religion.
 
Two nation theory became a reality in 1947. Nearly 90% Muslims voted for it. In 1946 Muslim League won 425 of 496 seats reserved for muslims with 89.2% votes. ML fought election on promise of creation of Pakistan.
After partition there should have been a complete exchange of hindu and muslim population which didn't happen all thanks to Congress party.
Congress allowed Muslims to stay in India despite the fact that they wanted Pakistan, they also abandoned the non muslim population in Pakistan despite them being against the idea of Pakistan!
Nehru and Gandhi went in denial mode of a jilted lover where one believes that the girl (muslims) still loves them and they can win them over. Movies like Ranjhanaa, Awargi (1990) etc. comes to mind regarding this.

Muslims stayed in India because they were never persecuted whereas their hindu counterparts in neighborhood countries got a different treatment.

Hindus ended up being the losers in the whole mess called partition. They lost big part of their motherland and ended up sharing the remaining part with the same people who asked for the partition! They were put on strong anesthesia called Nehruvian secularism ( putting minorities ahead and adjusting to their whims and fancies). The anesthesia lasted for nearly 60 years but it is running out now.
CAA is a step to correct the mistake of the past by allowing Hindus and other minorities which were left to fend for themselves in a islamic state post partition.
Anyone who is indulging in violence during protests should be dealt with brute force irrespective of their religion.




Summed up brilliantly. :bow:
 
Two nation theory became a reality in 1947. Nearly 90% Muslims voted for it. In 1946 Muslim League won 425 of 496 seats reserved for muslims with 89.2% votes. ML fought election on promise of creation of Pakistan.
After partition there should have been a complete exchange of hindu and muslim population which didn't happen all thanks to Congress party.
Congress allowed Muslims to stay in India despite the fact that they wanted Pakistan, they also abandoned the non muslim population in Pakistan despite them being against the idea of Pakistan!
Nehru and Gandhi went in denial mode of a jilted lover where one believes that the girl (muslims) still loves them and they can win them over. Movies like Ranjhanaa, Awargi (1990) etc. comes to mind regarding this.

Muslims stayed in India because they were never persecuted whereas their hindu counterparts in neighborhood countries got a different treatment.

Hindus ended up being the losers in the whole mess called partition. They lost big part of their motherland and ended up sharing the remaining part with the same people who asked for the partition! They were put on strong anesthesia called Nehruvian secularism ( putting minorities ahead and adjusting to their whims and fancies). The anesthesia lasted for nearly 60 years but it is running out now.
CAA is a step to correct the mistake of the past by allowing Hindus and other minorities which were left to fend for themselves in a islamic state post partition.
Anyone who is indulging in violence during protests should be dealt with brute force irrespective of their religion.

Correct the days of Confused Nehru-Gandhi Indian Secularism are over . Leftists and Secularists should start adjusting to it.
 
Last edited:
Two nation theory became a reality in 1947. Nearly 90% Muslims voted for it. In 1946 Muslim League won 425 of 496 seats reserved for muslims with 89.2% votes. ML fought election on promise of creation of Pakistan.
After partition there should have been a complete exchange of hindu and muslim population which didn't happen all thanks to Congress party.
Congress allowed Muslims to stay in India despite the fact that they wanted Pakistan, they also abandoned the non muslim population in Pakistan despite them being against the idea of Pakistan!
Nehru and Gandhi went in denial mode of a jilted lover where one believes that the girl (muslims) still loves them and they can win them over. Movies like Ranjhanaa, Awargi (1990) etc. comes to mind regarding this.

Muslims stayed in India because they were never persecuted whereas their hindu counterparts in neighborhood countries got a different treatment.

Hindus ended up being the losers in the whole mess called partition. They lost big part of their motherland and ended up sharing the remaining part with the same people who asked for the partition! They were put on strong anesthesia called Nehruvian secularism ( putting minorities ahead and adjusting to their whims and fancies). The anesthesia lasted for nearly 60 years but it is running out now.
CAA is a step to correct the mistake of the past by allowing Hindus and other minorities which were left to fend for themselves in a islamic state post partition.
Anyone who is indulging in violence during protests should be dealt with brute force irrespective of their religion.

Post of the YEAR for me this... Summed it up brutally honest, in the truest of context.....
 
Back
Top