Constitutional package 'unanimously approved' by parliamentary committee [Post Updated #105]

[Bewal Express]

Bilawal affirms commitment to constitutional amendments ahead of Oct 25 deadline​

Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari has reiterated his commitment to completing the constitutional amendments, stating that if they are finalised before October 25, the matter can be resolved peacefully.

In a session with reporters in Islamabad on Wednesday, Bilawal was asked about his stance on former prime minister Imran Khan's military trial. He replied, “We need to assess the evidence first; after all, we have the authority to grant a presidential pardon.” He maintained that the PPP stands against the death penalty.

When questioned about the proposed constitutional amendments and their deadline of October 25, he stated, “If the amendments are made before October 25, the matter can be settled peacefully. While they can be done later, it may lead to confrontational situations.”

He further asserted that the PPP would not abandon the matter concerning the constitutional court, vowing to see it through to completion. “We have already faced significant delays; our demands date back to 2006 and are part of our manifesto,” he added.

Bilawal also criticised the judiciary's timing regarding certain actions, questioning why the timing of the injunction on reserved seats was not being scrutinised. He pointed out that the judiciary's four-page clarification issued on September 14, the day of a parliamentary session, raised questions about the judicial timing.

He mentioned that the head of the constitutional court would serve a three-year term and expressed his opposition to the establishment of military courts, emphasising that the justification for the federal constitutional court lies in the Supreme Court's historical precedents.

On the Karachi unrest case, which has been ongoing since 2011, Bilawal noted that the judiciary had affected the local government system under the pretext of this case, questioning whether unrest existed only in Karachi, as Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan also face similar issues.

He further criticised the political manoeuvring regarding the selection of the next Army Chief, suggesting that events on May 9 were bordering on insurrection. He warned that if constitutional amendments are not enacted, the resulting situation might spiral beyond anyone's control, noting that the 18th Amendment had previously blocked the path to martial law.

Bilawal affirms commitment to constitutional amendments ahead of Oct 25 deadline | The Express Tribune

PPP chairman asserts party will not abandon the constitutional court matter, vowing to see it through to completion

tribune.com.pk

In total the PPP has around 30 seats and the Nooras around 20 legit seats and even this is stretching it. But the genetics of these parties is autocracy and they are about to bulldoze through a constitutional amendment that have no support for. This is so that the retarded Establishment can stay for 5 years based the CJP getting a 3 year extension.

 

[FearlessRoar]

'Hold off on amendments until SCO Summit ends', Fazl asks govt​

Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (JUI-F) chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman called on the government to delay the proposed constitutional amendments until the conclusion of the upcoming Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) conference.

During a press conference in the capital on Tuesday, the JUI-F leader also urged the opposition to suspend their protests to maintain political stability during the international event.

Fazlur Rehman, while addressing the media, emphasized the need for a more deliberative process regarding the constitutional amendments, pointing to the example of the 18th Amendment, which took nine months of discussions before all parties reached an agreement.

“The government informed me that these amendments are being rushed, but I question why there is such urgency to make constitutional changes under an emergency,” he stated. “If force is used to impose these amendments, we will stand firm in our opposition.”

He further highlighted that the government's authority in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan appears to be waning, suggesting that the current political and internal divisions should be transformed into a movement toward unity.

“The situation our country is facing requires careful attention. The government's writ has weakened in these provinces,” he said, calling for restraint and consensus-building.

The JUI-F chief also raised concerns over the halt in the registration of religious seminaries, accusing the government of spreading false propaganda. “If the government has demanded, then they should also listen to ours,” Fazlur Rehman insisted.

When asked about potential political manoeuvring, Maulana Fazlur Rehman dismissed any notion of disunity within his ranks, stating that no members of his party had defected.

He reiterated his stance against "match-fixing" and horse-trading in politics, affirming his commitment to his party’s discipline. He clarified that there is no agreement in place for a joint protest with the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI).

Mr Fazl also touched upon the ongoing violence in the Middle East, expressing grave concern over Israel's continued aggression against Palestinians. He condemned the silence of the Muslim Ummah on the matter, calling it "worrisome."

“Israel is engaging in state-sponsored terrorism, and the Muslim Ummah is watching in silence. This silence must be broken,” he stated, while accusing Israel of using Western and American weaponry to further its military goals.

Fazlur Rehman also noted that the conflict has expanded to Lebanon, where prominent Muslim leaders are being targeted.

He called on the Muslim world to unite and take a stand against what he termed as Israel's "brutality and bloodshed." “The Muslim Ummah has to put an end to this terror,” he asserted, urging for immediate action.

'Hold off on amendments until SCO Summit ends', Fazl asks govt

Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (JUI-F) chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman on Thursday called on the government to delay the proposed constitutional amendments until the conclusion of the upcoming Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) conference.

www.samaa.tv

 

[FearlessRoar]

No deadline for constitutional amendments from PPP: Bilawal Bhutto Zardari​

Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari stated that there is no deadline for constitutional amendments from their side, although the government may face one.

Speaking to reporters on Wednesday, he stressed that the issue of a timeline for passing the proposed constitutional amendments is not a concern for the PPP. “However, the government may have a deadline,” he noted.

Bilawal highlighted that the government has the option to seek votes based on conscience, yet efforts for consensus are ongoing. “The PPP aims to work collaboratively with all political parties,” he said, expressing a desire to include various factions, including Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (JUI-F), in the discussions.

Regarding the status of constitutional amendments, he mentioned that the JUI-F has not yet provided a draft for the proposed changes. “Once the draft arrives, we will review it and engage in dialogue with JUI-F to determine the way forward,” he stated.

The PPP chairman also commented on recent judicial developments, referencing an order that was issued on a holiday without the Chief Justice’s prior knowledge. He reaffirmed the PPP's commitment to judicial reforms and equal rights for provinces.

Bilawal indicated that there was initial agreement on constitutional courts and judicial reforms from Rehman of JUI-F. However, he noted that the government’s attempts to amend Articles 8 and 51 of the Constitution were met with resistance from both the PPP and JUI-F.

When asked about Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), he remarked that Imran Khan and his party were given multiple opportunities on various issues but exhibited a lack of seriousness.

“If Imran Khan had made political decisions since April 2022, he would have been the prime minister today,” he asserted, adding that Khan seems more interested in engaging with the establishment than with politicians. “I do not see a bright political future for Imran. We formed a committee for political consensus, but PTI boycotted it as well,” he concluded.

No deadline for constitutional amendments from PPP: Bilawal Bhutto Zardari | The Express Tribune

PPP chairman says govt has the option to seek votes based on conscience, yet efforts for consensus are ongoing

tribune.com.pk

 

[The Bald Eagle]

Pakistan Muslim League - Nawaz (PML-N) President Nawaz Sharif and Pakistan Peoples Party Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari have held discussions during which the two leaders reached an agreement on constitutional amendments

Bilawal called on Nawaz Sharif at the Punjab House, where the former Prime Minister welcomed the PPP leader. The two leaders also exchanged views on the country's political situation.

The discussion primarily focused on judicial reforms and constitutional amendments.

They decided to present these amendments in Parliament following further consultation, with the timeline for this process to be determined in consultation with other political parties.

Maryam Aurangzeb, Rana Sanaullah, Pervez Rashid, Irfan Siddiqui, and Ahsan Iqbal attended of the meeting from the PML-N.

Meanwhile, the PPP delegation included Yousaf Raza Gillani, Raja Pervaiz Ashraf, Khursheed Shah, Murtaza Wahab, Murtaza Javed Abbasi, Naveed Qamar, and Palwasha Khan.

Nawaz Sharif is scheduled to attend a dinner in honour of a Saudi delegation later tonight.

What are the constitutional amendments about?

According to an earlier working paper for the 26th Constitutional Amendment, one of the key proposals includes the establishment of a parallel Federal Constitutional Court, alongside the Supreme Court.

The Chief Justice of the Constitutional Court will serve for three years, with retirement set at 68 years of age. Additionally, the amendment proposed that any member of parliament voting against party instructions will have their vote disregarded.

The proposal also suggested that the authority to appoint the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and the Chief Justice of the Constitutional Court be transferred to the Prime Minister, based on recommendations from an eight-member committee of the National Assembly.

One of the most notable amendments includes changes to Article 48 of the Constitution, which would prevent any court, tribunal, or authority from inquiring into advice sent by the Prime Minister or Cabinet to the President.

Meanwhile, an amendment to Article 63 would ensure that votes cast against party instructions will no longer be counted.

Another major proposal in the working paper involves changes to Article 78, which advocates for the creation of the Federal Constitutional Court.

Additionally, amendments to Article 175 suggest that judges of the High Courts and Sharia Courts will be appointed by a commission, with the Chief Justice of the Constitutional Court heading this commission.

The commission will consist of the two senior-most judges of the Constitutional Court, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, and the two senior-most Supreme Court judges.

Further, the commission will include the Minister of Law, the Attorney General, a senior advocate, and two members each from the National Assembly and Senate.

For the appointment of judges to the Federal Constitutional Court, the commission will no longer involve Supreme Court judges, instead consisting of three additional judges from the Constitutional Court.

Source: The Express Tribune

 

[Cricket Warrior]

Govt to move constitutional amendment in NA on Oct 18

The ruling coalition is likely to table the much-talked about constitutional amendment bill in the National Assembly on Oct 18.

According to sources, the government has barred its members of parliament (MPs) from going abroad till Oct 18 in the wake of 26th amendment.

The government has also directed the former MNAs who were earlier de-notified by the ECP, to reach Islamabad on Oct 17.

It is being speculated that the ECP may take back its earlier decision of de-notifying the MNAs before the NA session.

Earlier in the day, Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) President Nawaz Sharif and Pakistan People's Party (PPP) Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari had agreed on constitutional amendment during a meeting held in Islamabad.


Dunya News

 

[The Bald Eagle]

Constitutional package still in limbo as consensus eludes parliamentary committee

The government’s much-touted constitutional amendment remains in limbo as consensus eluded the Friday meeting of the parliamentary committee set up to debate the package.

The much-talked-about Constitutional Package is legislation proposing a set of constitutional amendments, including the extension of the top judge’s term.

Three separate drafts of the constitutional package are being prepared – one by the government, the second by the PPP, and the third by the Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F).

The committee, led by PPP’s Khursheed Shah, has the representation of all parties, including the PTI. It was formed by the National Assembly speaker for reconciliation among lawmakers, particularly between the PTI and the government, after a raid by plainclothesmen to round up the PTI men from the Parliament House.

The parliamentary committee meeting took place today where major political parties, including the PML-N, PPP, PTI and JUI-F, discussed drafts for the constitutional package.

Talking to reporters after the meeting, Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar said recommendations were presented to the committee but the members could not reach any agreement.

“The PTI asked for time to examine and they did not give their opinions today,” he said, adding that the JUI-F, which was expected to share its suggestions at today’s meeting, was asked to share its draft as well. He said the party might present its draft tomorrow.

“We will meet tomorrow at noon to take matters forward,” he added. Tarar said the suggestions from the government and the bar bodies were brought before the committee and it was decided to have another meeting on Saturday.

JUI-F chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman said the government shared a draft for the first time, adding that the PPP and JUI-F will have talks with one another and make attempts to produce one draft, after which it will be shared for consultation with the PML-N and PTI to achieve consensus.

He said other political parties would be brought aboard as well.

PTI leaders Amir Dogar and Barrister Ali Gohar were also present at the meeting.

Gohar said that the PTI would give suggestions when a detailed draft was presented.

“We have not seen anything from the government,” he said.

Meanwhile, Dogar said that the government’s draft “has ambiguity” and it should present plans to the committee with clarity. He said further committee meetings would be held.

“The amendment requires more time,” he said, adding, “We will talk with party members and experts, and with Maulana Fazlur Rehman as we have an understanding.”

Earlier, the PPP and PML-N decided to postpone the much-touted constitutional amendment until after the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit, and agreed to incorporate the suggestions put forth by Fazl as the ruling coalition woos his support to achieve a two-thirds majority in parliament.

Source: Dawn News

 

[FearlessRoar]

PPP proposes provincial constitutional courts in line with federal structure​

The Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) has released a draft of constitutional amendments, proposing more than 20 changes, including the establishment of provincial constitutional courts in line with federal structures.

According to the draft received by Express News, the PPP has suggested amendments to Articles 175, 191, 189, 175B, 209A, and 210, with an additional amendment proposed for Article 175AA.

The draft states that a federal constitutional court should be established under the new constitutional amendments, with the Chief Justice serving a term of three years.

The PPP's proposal aims to mirror the federal model by recommending the creation of provincial constitutional courts as well.

Through Article 191AA, the PPP has introduced a provision for separate constitutional courts in each province, including the suggestion for a separate Chief Justice for the provincial constitutional court.

These courts are proposed to be established in provincial capitals, with judges appointed by an eleven-member committee.

The Chief Justice of the constitutional court would head the committee responsible for appointing judges to both federal and provincial constitutional courts.

The proposed amendments indicate that two members from the National Assembly and the Senate would be included in the judges' committee.

A three-member committee, led by the Chief Justice of the provincial constitutional court, would submit the names of judges to the constitutional committee. The draft also outlines a procedure for the removal of judges under Article 209.

Moreover, the proposed amendments state that a five-member commission, headed by the Chief Justice of the constitutional court, would have the authority to remove judges.

This commission would consist of the Chief Justice of the constitutional court, two senior judges, and two judges from the provincial constitutional court.

An constitutional commission would be established to oversee the appointment of judges, and a similar commission at the provincial level would manage judicial appointments in Pakistan.

PPP proposes provincial constitutional courts in line with federal structure | The Express Tribune

These courts are proposed to be established in provincial capitals, with judges appointed by eleven-member committee

tribune.com.pk

 

[The Bald Eagle]

Hafiz Naeem calls proposed amendment 'attack on constitution'​

Jamaat-e-Islami (JI) chief Hafiz Naeemur Rehman criticised the proposed constitutional amendment regarding the Supreme Court, labelling it an "attack on the constitution" and called on the opposition to fully reject it.

“Debating the amendment’s details is tantamount to strengthening the government. Any vote in favour will be seen as a tool of the establishment," he stated.

JI chief also called on the government to immediately terminate contracts with independent power producers (IPPs) linked to the military, bureaucracy, and the Sharif family.

He urged Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif to announce public relief by reducing electricity bills from next month, citing potential savings of Rs411 billion if five IPP contracts are ended.

Speaking at a rally in Gujrat, Hafiz Naeem said, "The military and civilian bureaucracy should forgo their privileges, as the public can no longer bear the burden of the ruling class's extravagance."

He added that JI’s movement had brought the issue of IPP profiteering to light, which would otherwise have continued unchecked.

Source: The Express Tribune

 

[FearlessRoar]

Abbasi slams proposed constitutional amendments​

Senior politician Shahid Khaqan Abbasi has strongly opposed the proposed 26th Constitutional Amendment, stating that undermining the judiciary’s independence is not a solution to past mistakes.

In a statement on the prposed amendments, Abbasi, an Awam Pakistan Party leader, voiced concerns over the government's actions, questioning its mandate.

He warned that the proposed amendment would severely impact the judiciary's autonomy.

"The proposed law allowing the transfer of High Court judges will be used to put them under pressure," Abbasi said, further stating that this would weaken the protection of citizens' fundamental rights.

He also criticised the introduction of a Federal Constitutional Court, suggesting it would diminish the role of Supreme Court judges.

Abbasi also raised alarms over the potential expansion of military court trials, describging them as a direct assault on civil liberties.

"Destroying judicial independence is not a remedy for the bad decisions of the past," Abbasi concluded, firmly opposing any move that threatens the core values of the justice system.

He has previously called for Chief Justice of Pakistan Qazi Faez Isa to retire after completing his tenure, amidst what he described as political instability and chaos in the country.

Furthermore, Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (JUI-F) Chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman on October 11 expressed conditional support for the government's proposed constitutional amendments, emphasising the need for consensus among political forces.

Following a Special Committee of Parliament meeting, Rehman said: “We are trying to remove the controversial contents from the draft.”

He added that the public had rejected the government’s initial draft.

The constitutional package aims to establish a federal constitutional court and set a three-year tenure for the Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP).

The government initially attempted to present the amendments last month, but faced resistance from both allies and opposition members, prompting a consultation process.

Former PM Khaqan Abbasi criticizes proposed 26th constitutional amendment | The Express Tribune

He voices concerns over govt's actions questioning its mandate and proposed amendments impact on judiciary's autonomy

tribune.com.pk

 

[BouncerGuy]

Govt, opposition inch their way to a consensus

As the majority, except for the PTI, agreed to alter the procedures for superior judges’ appointment, the special parliamentary committee still failed to evolve a consensus on the constitutional package, with the JUI-F advocating a “constitutional bench” instead of a constitutional court proposed by the government.

The committee which has the representation of all parties, including the PTI, met for the second consecutive day on Saturday amid reports that the constitutional package would be tabled in parliament by Oct 25.

A day after the PPP made its draft proposals public, the JUI-F shared its draft of proposed amendments with the committee under the chairmanship of PPP leader Syed Khursheed Shah.

The committee will meet again on Monday (tomorrow) hoping to achieve the consensus, with the chair constituting a sub-committee to review the drafts submitted by both the government and the opposition parties.

The sub-committee will provide its recommendations to the parliamentary committee and includes Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar, PTI leaders Barrister Gohar Ali Khan and Barrister Ali Zafar; PPP’s Farooq H. Naek; and JUI-F leader Kamran Murtaza.

Amid hopes for a consensus, the parliamentary panel will meet again on Monday.

A participant of the meeting from the ruling coalition said homework will be completed in behind-the-scenes meetings. They added that “we may have a consensus document ready before Monday’s meeting, leaving the PTI aside”.

Talking to reporters after the meeting, PML-N senior leader Irfan Siddiqui claimed that the committee was close to reaching a consensus on constitutional amendments, with key political parties aligning on major points. He said that the primary goal of the special parliamentary committee was to reach a consensus on constitutional amendments.

He expressed optimism about the ongoing discussions with the JUI-F, noting recent meetings brought a positive outlook. He said that the government’s draft, with suggestions from the legal community and bar associations, has been finalised.

The Muttahida Qaumi Movement-Pakistan (MQM-P) also submitted a separate draft focused on local government reforms, although it agrees with the broader constitutional amendments.

“The PTI is the only party that has not submitted anything in writing,” Senator Siddiqui said.

PPP-JUI consensus

According to JUI-F leader Kamran Murtaza, the only difference between the JUI-F and PPP drafts is that of the constitutional court. The JUI-F has proposed a constitutional bench instead of a constitutional court, he said. The JUI-F has no objection to the rest of the PPP’s draft, he added.

The JUI-F leader said the party was opposed to the constitutional court because it would be inappropriate to establish a separate court for only 200 cases.

PPP parliamentary leader in the Senate Senator Sherry Rehman said, “We are trying to bring the constitutional amendment with consensus.”

PPP leader Raja Pervez Ashraf echoed Mr Murtaza’s optimism, noting that JUI-F chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman had suggested drafting a joint proposal with the PPP, which would be shared soon. “Things are moving in the right direction. Stay positive,” Mr Ashraf remarked, adding that the Oct 25 deadline was unrelated to the constitutional amendment discussions.

Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar emphasised the need for dialogue to reach a consensus on amendments. He said the constitutional amendment could be introduced after Oct 25, and even after two months. He said discussions were ongoing on four to five points in the committee.

Answering a question about the notification regarding the appointment of the new CJP, he said the deadline for this was Oct 24, adding that the notification of the new chief justice had always been issued a day or two before the appointment. The appointment notification of Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa was issued a little earlier in view of the arrival of the caretaker government, he pointed out.

PTI Chairman Barrister Gohar confirmed that his party had not yet presented a draft. He said the party’s founding chairman was to be consulted before submitting proposals.

An informed source told Dawn that during the meeting of the special parliamentary committee, the PTI was requested to cancel or at least delay its plan for protest on Oct 15, but it flatly refused.

In response to the request, PTI leader Omar Ayub Khan said PTI activists were being harassed and raids were being carried out at their houses. “Staging a protest under these circumstances is our constitutional right,” Omar Ayub was quoted as saying. He claimed that it never happened in the past.

Senator Irfan Siddiqui debunking the claim recalled the day when he was picked up from his house during the PTI government.

‘Unfinished agenda’

Meanwhile, in a message on social media platform X, PPP chairman Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari shared the draft of the constitutional amendments proposed by the PPP and invited meaningful feedback from the public.

He said this proposal was to complete the unfinished judicial reforms agenda outlined in the Charter of Democracy. “We propose the creation of a Federal Constitutional Court, with equal representation of all federating units.”

Mr Bhutto-Zardari wrote, “We also propose ending the process of appointment of the judges, by the judges and for the judges. Instead, by merging the judicial and parliamentary committees we give an equal role to parliament, judiciary and legal fraternity.”

In a related development, the PPP and JUI-F discussed proposed constitutional amendments at Zardari House.

DAWN NEWS

 

[Bewal Express]

Qazi is the player, the rule maker and the referee.

 

[FearlessRoar]

Bilawal Zardari posted on his X handle:

Who was Justice Dorab Patel and why did he also want a federal constitutional court? His experience proved Pakistan needed it.

Justice Patel was former Chief Justice Of Sindh High Court. Justice of The Supreme Court of Pakistan. Co-founder of Human Rights Commission of Pakistan and amongst the founding members of Asian Human Rights commission.

Justice Patel was one of four honorable judges who acquitted Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto and refused to be party to his judicial murder. He held that there wasn’t the evidence to convict Quaid-e-Awam and he did not consider approver as a reliable witness. Dorab Patel also said that the trial of Shaheed in the High Court in his absence was flawed. Something it took the Supreme Court of Pakistan 45 years to recognize.

Justice Patel refused to take Dictator Zia’s PCO oath in 1981 choosing instead to resign. Had he not he would have become the Chief Justice of Pakistan.

He proposed the idea of a constitutional court to his colleagues at HRCP Asma Jahangir & IA Rehman who agreed with him.

Our history is inconvenient for those who think Pakistani politics begins with the cricket World Cup and culminates in Imran/General Faiz Inqalab. Our commitment to our, constitutional evolution, manifesto and Charter of Democracy remains consistent despite the changing faces of Prime Ministers, Justices and Establishment.

We never legislate or amend the constitution at a whim like dictators and judges have so easily done. We work towards our goals for generations. It took us 30 years to restore what we could of 1973 constitution in the 18th amendment. It has taken us almost 2 decades to get to the point we can undo the damage done by 19th amendment and PCO CJP Chaudry’s judicialization of politics. 26th amendment is not rushed. It’s long over due.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1845429515067011390

 

[Bewal Express]

Bilawal Zardari posted on his X handle:

Who was Justice Dorab Patel and why did he also want a federal constitutional court? His experience proved Pakistan needed it.

Justice Patel was former Chief Justice Of Sindh High Court. Justice of The Supreme Court of Pakistan. Co-founder of Human Rights Commission of Pakistan and amongst the founding members of Asian Human Rights commission.

Justice Patel was one of four honorable judges who acquitted Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto and refused to be party to his judicial murder. He held that there wasn’t the evidence to convict Quaid-e-Awam and he did not consider approver as a reliable witness. Dorab Patel also said that the trial of Shaheed in the High Court in his absence was flawed. Something it took the Supreme Court of Pakistan 45 years to recognize.

Justice Patel refused to take Dictator Zia’s PCO oath in 1981 choosing instead to resign. Had he not he would have become the Chief Justice of Pakistan.

He proposed the idea of a constitutional court to his colleagues at HRCP Asma Jahangir & IA Rehman who agreed with him.

Our history is inconvenient for those who think Pakistani politics begins with the cricket World Cup and culminates in Imran/General Faiz Inqalab. Our commitment to our, constitutional evolution, manifesto and Charter of Democracy remains consistent despite the changing faces of Prime Ministers, Justices and Establishment.

We never legislate or amend the constitution at a whim like dictators and judges have so easily done. We work towards our goals for generations. It took us 30 years to restore what we could of 1973 constitution in the 18th amendment. It has taken us almost 2 decades to get to the point we can undo the damage done by 19th amendment and PCO CJP Chaudry’s judicialization of politics. 26th amendment is not rushed. It’s long over due.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1845429515067011390

He is trying to hard to impress the establishment.

 

[Cricket Warrior]

PPP opposes vote on constitutional amendments on Oct 18

The Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) has opposed holding a vote on constitutional amendments on Oct 18.

According to PPP source, the party has suggested that the government should present the amendment either before or after Oct 18, as the PPP’s central leadership will be busy in the Hyderabad rally on that date, commemorating the Karsaz tragedy.

Sources indicate that the amendments could be presented in parliament n Oct 17. Previously, the PPP had opposed bringing the amendments on Oct 13, as the federal government intended to carry out the legislation on that Sunday.

The federal government had called its overseas and allied parliamentarians back before Oct 13 for this purpose.

https://dunyanews.tv/en/Pakistan/844270-ppp-opposes-vote-on-constitutional-amendments-on-oct-18

 

[Bewal Express]

PPP opposes vote on constitutional amendments on Oct 18

The Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) has opposed holding a vote on constitutional amendments on Oct 18.

According to PPP source, the party has suggested that the government should present the amendment either before or after Oct 18, as the PPP’s central leadership will be busy in the Hyderabad rally on that date, commemorating the Karsaz tragedy.

Sources indicate that the amendments could be presented in parliament n Oct 17. Previously, the PPP had opposed bringing the amendments on Oct 13, as the federal government intended to carry out the legislation on that Sunday.

The federal government had called its overseas and allied parliamentarians back before Oct 13 for this purpose.

https://dunyanews.tv/en/Pakistan/844270-ppp-opposes-vote-on-constitutional-amendments-on-oct-18

The PPP are a disgrace. For a short term gain they have destroyed the PK constitution. Off course they will vote for it and what's more the Generals have them by the short and curlies

 

[The Bald Eagle]

As always Molana is playing on both sides of the pitch
====

The PPP and Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman reached Lahore’s Jati Umra residence of the Sharif brothers on Wednesday to discuss the proposed 26th constitutional amendment

The much-talked-about Constitutional Package is legislation proposing a set of constitutional amendments, including the extension of the top judge’s term.

Three separate drafts of the constitutional package were being prepared — one by the government, the second by the PPP, and the third by the JUI-F. A committee, led by PPP’s Khursheed Shah, has the representation of all parties, including the PTI. It was formed by the National Assembly speaker for reconciliation among lawmakers, particularly between the PTI and the government, after a raid by plainclothesmen to round up the PTI men from the Parliament House.

The PPP and Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) reached an agreement a day ago on a shared draft. Although the key points of the constitutional package were not disclosed, Fazl had made it clear that he had rejected the previous draft and would not compromise on parliamentary supremacy or the essence of the Constitution.

Source: Dawn News

 

[Bewal Express]

As always Molana is playing on both sides of the pitch
====

The PPP and Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman reached Lahore’s Jati Umra residence of the Sharif brothers on Wednesday to discuss the proposed 26th constitutional amendment

The much-talked-about Constitutional Package is legislation proposing a set of constitutional amendments, including the extension of the top judge’s term.

Three separate drafts of the constitutional package were being prepared — one by the government, the second by the PPP, and the third by the JUI-F. A committee, led by PPP’s Khursheed Shah, has the representation of all parties, including the PTI. It was formed by the National Assembly speaker for reconciliation among lawmakers, particularly between the PTI and the government, after a raid by plainclothesmen to round up the PTI men from the Parliament House.

The PPP and Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) reached an agreement a day ago on a shared draft. Although the key points of the constitutional package were not disclosed, Fazl had made it clear that he had rejected the previous draft and would not compromise on parliamentary supremacy or the essence of the Constitution.

Source: Dawn News

The guy is as bent as they come. I hope he gets so many crore that his beer belly explodes.

 

[FearlessRoar]

PM Shehbaz meets President Zardari to discuss constitutional amendments​

Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has met with President Asif Ali Zardari at the President house to discuss proposed constitutional amendments and the prevailing political situation.

The meeting on Thursday comes as the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) and Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) step back from their earlier proposal to establish constitutional courts, Express News reported.

Moreover, during a special parliamentary committee meeting, chaired by Khursheed Shah, discussions were held on the 26th constitutional amendment draft.

According to sources, the governing coalition parties and Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (JUI-F) have agreed to drop the proposed 26th constitutional amendment, which called for the creation of constitutional courts.

Instead, they reached a consensus on forming a constitutional bench.

The special committee meeting concluded with the government and JUI-F deciding to consult the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) on a joint draft. JUI-F leader Maulana Fazlur Rehman will share the finalised draft with PTI leadership, marking the nearing completion of the amendment process.

However, Information Advisor for Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa (K-P) Barrister Saif announced PTI will mount both legal and political resistance against the proposed constitutional amendment.

PTI lawmaker Barrister Saif labelled on Thursday that the current government is "illegitimate" and accused it of "attempting to secretly alter the constitution without public representation".

PTI's political committee has announced its decision to resist recent constitutional amendments and hold a nationwide protest this Friday, according to the Express-News.

The parliamentary committee will reconvene after Friday prayers to continue discussions on the draft.

Earlier today, Muttahida Qaumi Movement-Pakistan's (MQM-P) amendments to 26th constitutional draft have been discarded.

The proposed amendments related to local government powers and funds have also been removed from the draft.

The ruling parties, Pakistan Muslim League-N (PML-N) and Pakistan People's Party (PPP), succeeded in convincing MQM.

However, MQM's constitutional amendments will be considered in the next 27th constitutional amendment, with the party expressing agreement with the government's suggestions.

PM Shehbaz meets President Zardari to discuss constitutional amendments | The Express Tribune

PML-N and PPP withdraw from the proposal for constitutional courts, agreeing on alternative reforms.

tribune.com.pk

 

[Cricket Warrior]

Key points in constitutional amendments draft

The draft for a series of constitutional amendments prepared by the Federal Law Minister has emerged, aimed at revising several key clauses within Pakistan’s Constitution, ARY News reported on Thursday.

As per the details, the proposed draft addresses various aspects of governance, judicial appointments, and the powers of key officials.

One significant proposal includes amending Clause 4 of Article 48, which states that the advice given by the President, the Cabinet, and the Prime Minister of the country cannot be challenged in any forum.

Another major proposed change is to Article 63A, which pertains to voting procedures within political parties. The government’s amendment would allow the votes cast by lawmakers against the instructions of their party’s leader to be counted.

After such a vote, the party leader would retain the authority to take action against the dissenting members.

The government has also suggested amending Article 111, allowing provincial assembly discussions on legal matters to involve not just the Attorney General but also legal advisors, expanding their influence in legislative matters.

One of the more significant reforms concerns the appointment of judges, outlined in a proposed amendment to Article 175A.

The Judicial Commission would be tasked with reviewing the performance of High Court judges, and a new procedure for appointing Supreme Court judges is suggested.

The proposal includes forming a judges’ appointment committee composed of two government members – a senator and an MNA proposed by the PM – and two opposition members – nominated by the opposition leader – with additional parliamentary input.

Additionally, the 12-member parliamentary committee – comprised of eight members from National Assembly (NA) and four senator – would have the power to appoint the Chief Justice of Pakistan, selecting from among the three most senior judges.

These reforms also include the provision for in-camera meetings during the appointment of the Chief Justice.


ARY News

 

[The Bald Eagle]

I believe the judges would oppose it anyway after 25 October if not for Pakistan then for their own sake.

 

[Bewal Express]

I believe the judges would oppose it anyway after 25 October if not for Pakistan then for their own sake.

If the lawyers lying down like pet with tails is anything to go by, the judges won't do anything.

 

[The Bald Eagle]

JUI-F rejects govt constitutional amendment draft, warns against pressure tactics

Head of Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (F) Maulana Fazal ur Rehman has firmly rejected the government’s proposed constitutional amendment draft, claiming that undue pressure is being applied to his party’s members.

Talking to media along with PTI leadership, Fazal ur Rehman highlighted concerns that members of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) and Balochistan National Party (BNP) are facing intimidation tactics.

JUI-F chief emphasized that if such coercive measures continue, his party may be compelled to halt dialogue with government. He asserted that constructive discussions would yield positive responses but warned that if the government adopts a bullying approach, they will reciprocate in kind.

Rehman emphasized that if such coercive measures continue, his party may be compelled to halt dialogue with the government. He asserted that constructive discussions would yield positive responses but warned that if the government adopts a bullying approach, they will reciprocate in kind.

Moreover, he revealed that his party members are being lured with substantial offers, indicating a concerning trend in political manoeuvring.

Source: Daily Ausaf

 

[Bewal Express]

Diesel is complaining that his people are getting kidnapped and blackmailed. Where have you been old man? Why are you surprised.

 

[Bewal Express]

Some govt guy was asked on why we don't know what's in the amendment, he said thr public doesn't know. This arrogance comes knowing that you have no public support and all you need is guns and the guys with guns.

 

[FearlessRoar]

Constitutional package 'unanimously approved' by parliamentary committee​

In a major development, the special parliamentary committee — comprising government and opposition members — on Friday "unanimously" approved the draft of 26th Constitutional Amendment.

The development comes after the special committee formed to debate the contentious judicial package met under the chairmanship of PPP lawmaker Syed Khursheed Shah on Friday.

Speaking to the reporters, Shah said the draft would be presented in the federal cabinet meeting for approval.

"The draft has been approved unanimously," he said adding that the committee has also agreed on allowing overseas Pakistanis to contest the elections.

Special committee 'unanimously approves' judicial package

In a major development, the special parliamentary committee — comprising government and opposition members — on Friday unanimously approved the draft of 26th Constitutional...

www.thenews.com.pk

 

[FearlessRoar]

Final decision on constitutional amendments after Imran Khan’s directions: Gohar​

Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) leader Barrister Gohar Ali Khan said on Friday that a consensus has been nearly reached with Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman regarding the 26th Constitutional Amendment, and a final announcement will be made after consultations with PTI founder Imran Khan.

Speaking to the media following a meeting with Maulana Fazlur Rehman in Islamabad, Barrister Gohar explained that PTI held a meeting with its allies, including the JUI-F chief, to discuss the constitutional amendments. He stated that there was a strong possibility of reaching an agreement during the previous talks, and Friday's meeting further solidified that understanding.

"We are still in talks. Once we finalise our position, we will seek Imran Khan’s instructions. Today, we will request a meeting with him, and we aim to meet him tomorrow. Based on his directives, we will announce our final stance," Barrister Gohar said.

He added that significant progress was made in the discussions with Maulana Fazlur Rehman, bringing them closer to an agreement. "We had a detailed discussion with Maulana Fazlur Rehman, and we are nearly at a consensus," he noted.

Barrister Gohar also mentioned that representatives from both PTI and JUI-F participated in the Special Parliamentary Committee discussions on the amendment. PTI was represented by Aamir Dogar, while JUI-F also had its representatives present. The committee approved the draft amendment, which formed the basis for negotiations between PTI and JUI-F.

"We are hopeful that tomorrow, after receiving directions from Imran Khan, we will make a final announcement. For now, we have almost reached an agreement with Maulana Fazlur Rehman, which we will present to Imran Khan and share his guidance tomorrow," he said.

Responding to a question, Barrister Gohar clarified that Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari also made an appearance during the meeting. Although Bilawal greeted everyone, there was no discussion on the draft amendment with him. "Bilawal Bhutto arrived, and Maulana Fazlur Rehman gave him time. We exchanged pleasantries, but there was no conversation on the draft," he stated.

The PTI delegation met with Maulana Fazlur Rehman at his residence to discuss the proposed amendments. The delegation included Barrister Gohar, Omar Ayub, Asad Qaiser, Salman Akram Raja, Senator Allama Raja Nasir Abbas, and Sahibzada Hamid Raza.

Meanwhile, Bilawal Bhutto arrived at Maulana Fazlur Rehman's residence as the PTI delegation concluded their meeting. He was accompanied by PPP leaders Naveed Qamar, Murtaza Wahab, and Jameel Soomro. On Fazlur Rehman’s side, Abdul Ghafoor Haideri and Maulana Attaur Rehman were present.

Both leaders, Bilawal Bhutto and Maulana Fazlur Rehman, exchanged views on the proposed 26th Constitutional Amendment during their separate meeting.

This meeting comes amid significant political dialogue, as parties attempt to reach an agreement on the proposed amendments, which are expected to play a key role in Pakistan's future political framework.

Final decision on constitutional amendments after Imran Khan’s directions: Gohar | The Express Tribune

We exchanged pleasantries with Bilawal at Fazl’s residence, but there was no conversation on the draft, says PTI chairman

tribune.com.pk