Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And you think they are free to speak their mind? The BCCI are more controlling than North Korea. If the commentators are free to speak their mind, why couldn't they say a word about Kohli until Michael Vaughan summed up the courage. A guy veers off his path and barges another player but the commies were mealy mouthed. That's just one example.How do you know they are told to? Were you there to listen?
The other day you were saying with a straight face Bumrah is a chucker as if you have some proof.
You tend to think too highly of yourself. Unlike @IMMY69 , I wont call you jealous. Its just that you are highly delusional...I have noticed in political threads as well.
It's called self censorship. They know too much is at stakeNow posters aparently here know what Australian commentators have been asked by Fox sports to say.
![]()
And you think they are free to speak their mind? The BCCI are more controlling than North Korea. If the commentators are free to speak their mind, why couldn't they say a word about Kohli until Michael Vaughan summed up the courage. A guy veers off his path and barges another player but the commies were mealy mouthed. That's just one example.
It's called self censorship. They know too much is at stake
Even for bouncers holding said bumrah's bouncer is the meanest one after Roberts.Plus Bumrah clearly swings the ball more than mcgrath, both conventional and reverse.
Fox opened a debate about rohits poor/idiotic captaincy after gabba heads century and asked him to step down after bgt.They demanded bumrah to take captaincy. Its pure evil bcci control that they have the guts to attack bcci captianWhy would Fox sports be controlled by BCCI?
Now posters aparently here know what Australian commentators have been asked by Fox sports to say.
![]()
Plus Bumrah clearly swings the ball more than mcgrath, both conventional and reverse.
Isa Guha clearly did not get that memo when she made derogatory comment on Bumrah .... lol
Though I agree she need not apologise as it was a harmless comment but we live in a woke world. How come you are blaming BCCI for it? Now a days you cant make any comment that come across as sexist, racist and misogynist on tele as it is their policy. You should know it living in the UKI'd call it " Slip of the tongue moment". We very well know what happened next, when she was made to apologies on live air, with chief BCCI Mouthpiece Shastri in presence.
Though I agree she need not apologise as it was a harmless comment but we live in a woke world. How come you are blaming BCCI for it? Now a days you cant make any comment that come across as sexist, racist and misogynist on tele as it is their policy. You should know it living in the UK
That's because he uses a weird action. I bet he couldn't swing it with a conventional legal action.
Lol this guy uses Bhumrah when he needs to attack Rizwan and Babar and when not he slanders Bhumrah as wellAt the same time I respect his skill because even for a chucker you need to be good to do it effectively, so out of all the illegal bowlers in the world, Jasprit is right up there.
Just to be clear.
Jasprit Bumrah has never had his action tested for legality.
Any claims that he has “hyperextension” without straightening are completely unproven.
Any claim that his action has been cleared as legal is untrue.
What we have is a man with a suspicious action, who is protected by the world’s most powerful cricket board, as a result of which the legality of his action has never been tested, let alone cleared.
None of those players had suspicious actions. Whereas any non-Indian with the action shown above would have been tested years ago.Just to be clear McGrath, Wasim, Steyn, Ambrose, Marshall, Garner never had their action tested for legality.
Any claim their action has been cleared as legal is untrue.
What we have is some of the ATG bowlers with dodgy action protected by fans and nostalgia masquerading as best bowlers ever without being tested for legality action.
Anyone can make any claims, just like the above claims hold 0 value, so does yours. Its job of umpires and match referees to report suspicious actions, hundreds of umpires/match referees haven’t reported Bumrah even once.
Just relax and enjoy the bowling, no need to get your blood pressure high with jealousy.
It makes no difference currently.If you strongly believe he’s chucking then feel free to tag ICC and match referees on Twitter, file an official complaint with ICC and ask journos like @Saj to create an uproar about it and force ICC to test him.
None of those players had suspicious actions. Whereas any non-Indian with the action shown above would have been tested years ago.
There is clearly massive flexion. The onus should be on Bumrah to prove that there is not 15 degrees or more of straightening.
The rules were changed after Murali. The umpires can no longer call chucked deliveries.Just to be clear McGrath, Wasim, Steyn, Ambrose, Marshall, Garner never had their action tested for legality.
Any claim their action has been cleared as legal is untrue.
What we have is some of the ATG bowlers with dodgy action protected by fans and nostalgia masquerading as best bowlers ever without being tested for legality action.
Anyone can make any claims, just like the above claims hold 0 value, so does yours. Its job of umpires and match referees to report suspicious actions, hundreds of umpires/match referees haven’t reported Bumrah even once.
Just relax and enjoy the bowling, no need to get your blood pressure high with jealousy.
It makes no difference currently.
Bumrah has Immunity from Testing.
Any cricket board which complains will find that India will tour less often, for shorter series, and the board will lose money from private Indian TV networks.
The rules were changed after Murali. The umpires can no longer call chucked deliveries.
In effect, and umpire, referee or cricket board administrator who reports Bumrah will ensure that India ends their career and earning ability immediately.
India could pick Tony Lock and Ian Meckiff to open the bowling and they still wouldn’t get reported or sent for testing!
Funny you should say that.The onus is not on the player to prove anything.
It’s your opinion he has a dodgy action just like it can be my opinion that all the players I mentioned have dodgy action.
Your opinion means zilch just like my opinion.
Hundreds of umpires across the world and match referees do not share the same opinion as yours, just like no umpire/match referee shares the same opinion as mine of McGrath, Wasim etc having dodgy action.
So instead of ranting and increasing your blood pressure in old age, you have 2 options:
1. Mentioned in my previous post.
2. Enjoy the bowling masterclass of bumrah till it lasts.
Pragyan Ojha, look for that name.India could pick Tony Lock and Ian Meckiff to open the bowling and they still wouldn’t get reported or sent for testing!
He is not obliged to respond to sore losersThe onus should be on Bumrah to prove that there is not 15 degrees or more of straightening.
Just to be clear.
Jasprit Bumrah has never had his action tested for legality.
Any claims that he has “hyperextension” without straightening are completely unproven.
Any claim that his action has been cleared as legal is untrue.
What we have is a man with a suspicious action, who is protected by the world’s most powerful cricket board, as a result of which the legality of his action has never been tested, let alone cleared.
Also true is that Pakistani supporters words have ZERO value. ZILCH!
He is not obliged to respond to sore losers
The picture you provided are the ones posted by online trolls on Cricinfo comments section i.e doctored image.See my attached photo above
If that action doesn’t get tested, than how can any, ever?
What is your opinion on Brett Lee’s slinging action?If that action doesn’t get tested, than how can any, ever?
And I can assure you that in all three countries, Bumrah is viewed with an asterisk. Hugely talented bowler, but with a suspect action.
Just to be clear.
Jasprit Bumrah has never had his action tested for legality.
Any claims that he has “hyperextension” without straightening are completely unproven.
Any claim that his action has been cleared as legal is untrue.
What we have is a man with a suspicious action, who is protected by the world’s most powerful cricket board, as a result of which the legality of his action has never been tested, let alone cleared.
And I can assure you that in all three countries, Bumrah is viewed with an asterisk. Hugely talented bowler, but with a suspect action.
You have literally just confirmed my point.
I'll believe the day some respected former cricketer questions his action. In fact, Greg Chappell very recently completely shut down anyone and everyone saying that his action is completely clean.
Don't you know the whole cricketing world is under BCCI's payroll? The only neutral and unbiased people in the cricketing world and Pakistani cricket fans and those who support Pakistan cricket.ohhh yeah .... is that why none of the umpires from those countries have reported his action ? Or any of the numerous media houses covering this very high profile series
Funny you should say that.
I’m enjoying watching Bumrah’s skill, just as I enjoyed:
1. Watching Saeed Ajmal, when we all knew he was chucking but he was doing so gloriously. Like Bumrah, he’d been a nobody until he was in his mid-20’s, when he suddenly became a world beater.
2. Watching Flo-Jo break the world 100m and 200m records at the Seoul Olympics, when she’d been a nobody until she was nearly 30.
3. Watching Ben Johnson and Carl Lewis and Linford Christie compete in the dirtiest race in history in 1988.
I get exactly the same emotions watching Bumrah as watching Saeed Ajmal. Extraordinary skill, but how are clean cricketers supposed to have a career when certain bowlers are allowed to chuck?
Having a suspect action is when umpires call you for chucking.Not tested = Not cleared as Legal
Having a suspect action is when umpires call you for chucking.
Umpires not calling a bowler for chucking = The bowler not having a suspect action.
Funny you should raise Ojha.Pragyan Ojha, look for that name.
I did think Brett Lee’s action was suspect, to be honest. But not being Asian, I can’t clear a bowler’s action with the naked eye!I’m surprised the Convict Pom Hobbit hasn’t ever suspected Brett Lee with similar eyes.
The PM of Aus had to make a comment for Brett Lee when he was questioned
I did think Brett Lee’s action was suspect, to be honest. But not being Asian, I can’t clear a bowler’s action with the naked eye!![]()
None of those players had suspicious actions. Whereas any non-Indian with the action shown above would have been tested years ago.
There is clearly massive flexion. The onus should be on Bumrah to prove that there is not 15 degrees or more of straightening.
Bumrah doesn't need to prove anything to pakistanis.
International umpires are not allowed to call a bowler for chucking any more. The playing conditions for international cricket no longer permit them to.Having a suspect action is when umpires call you for chucking.
Umpires not calling a bowler for chucking = The bowler not having a suspect action.
Funny you should raise Ojha.
His case confirmed a long-held suspicion: the Indians privately test bowlers either suspicious actions. If they fail narrowly they are sent for remedial work. If they fail badly they are basically hidden away from ICC testing.
I suspect that India privately had Bumrah tested around 5-7 years ago. And that for reasons I don’t want to state, they concluded that the best way forward was to ensure that he never have independent ICC testing.
It would be so easy to say “we have tested him, his straightening is 12 degrees which is below the 15 degree maximum. So he’s definitely legal.”
But they don’t.
They prefer to play on with all the rumours and innuendo rather than take the risk of him failing testing.
I wasn’t on this site at the time.Did you ever question it , if so please direct us to that post.
Also what did the three countries think of Brett Lee’s wickets? Did they have a *?
310 wickets is a lot .. so seems like according to you Poms and Kiwis don’t question white bowlers.I wasn’t on this site at the time.
Brett Lee was a nobody who averaged 31 for his 310 Test wickets.
Unlike Bumrah, he wasn’t a match winner. So I don’t think too many Pom’s or Kiwis worried about him, given that they had McGrath or Warne to worry about at the other end!
As they are told to. My opinion is followed by many. I got the laws of Rugby changed with the 20 min red card and I may not succeed on this but we won't be silenced until he is tested.
I’m pretty sure that in the last hour I referenced Ian Meckiff and Tony Lock, so try again!310 wickets is a lot .. so seems like according to you Poms and Kiwis don’t question white bowlers.
Yeah but not someone who has 310 wickets to his name and WC..in that logic Asians talk about Ojha tooI’m pretty sure that in the last hour I referenced Ian Meckiff and Tony Lock, so try again!![]()
Yeah dude, even less so if he were to bowl with his left hand. Or bowl with his left hand while holding a ham sandwich in his right, and wearing a jason mask. if people were different they would do different things. that is the crux of what you said. insightful stuff bro. what's next? fire would be cooler if it were hot? water would be sweeter if it were sugar?That's because he uses a weird action. I bet he couldn't swing it with a conventional legal action.
oh man this guy is so adorable.Typical Indian fans. Trying to deflect attention to other players now (Brett Lee).
I personally don't think Brett Lee is a chucker. He had a clean action. Beautiful action. Not creepy like Bumrah's action.
All these companies work together and produce cricket. Tell me why the commentators couldn't comment on the barge until Vaughan had the courage?Fox sports is jointly owned by News Corp and Telstra. Do you have any idea what they are?
Bumrah has bowled in SA, did Super sports owned by Naspers censor itself?
Did Sky Sports in UK owned Comcast also censor itself?
All these companies work together and produce cricket. Tell me why the commentators couldn't comment on the barge until Vaughan had the courage?
All after Vaughan called it as it is. I was fuming at what he had done and I don't even have a dog in the fight. The commentators are forced to self censor because of the fear of the BCCI.Which commentators?
The commentators i was listening to called it unnecessary. Ravi Shastri had already criticized it. So had ponting.
Telestra or News Corp or Naspers or Comcast are different companies of different nations. They are not a cartel.
Companies with market cap of billions of dollars and revenues of billions are not afraid of BCCI.
Everyone isn't small time players Geo or ARY who as per pakistanis themselves run agendas
All after Vaughan called it as it is. I was fuming at what he had done and I don't even have a dog in the fight. The commentators are forced to self censor because of the fear of the BCCI.
I don't watch any PK commentators bar the odd opinion posted on here. I don't rate any of them.
They were scared and mealy mouthed until Vaughan called it and then on his shoulders they realised they would look stupid.
Commentators on air at that time called it.
No one not even BCCI can force companies like Comcast or Naspers or News Corp to censor itself. I doubt even a government can pull that off.
You think everyone works like media companies in Pakistan.
Oh really?It's clean, he has hyperextension
If Umpires think it is not clean, they will report it. They haven't so far, so it is clean.Oh really?
And that was confirmed by scientific testing?
Because in the absence of testing that is a made-up excuse, not a proven fact.
Lol like they banned Kholi for attacking a teenagerIf Umpires think it is not clean, they will report it. They haven't so far, so it is clean.
I agree. He should be banned. And akthar actually had real hyper extension cause he was tested. Also I think bumrah takes steroids. I don't see how someone wigh such short run-up can bowl 140.Typical Indian fans. Trying to deflect attention to other players now (Brett Lee).
I personally don't think Brett Lee is a chucker. He had a clean action. Beautiful action. Not creepy like Bumrah's action.
Unctuous platitudinous sycophant.I’m surprised the Convict Pom Hobbit hasn’t ever suspected Brett Lee with similar eyes.
The PM of Aus had to make a comment for Brett Lee when he was questioned
You are right.You can’t generate high pace with a vey short run up.Bumrah is chucking and he may be taking a banned substance.I agree. He should be banned. And akthar actually had real hyper extension cause he was tested. Also I think bumrah takes steroids. I don't see how someone wigh such short run-up can bowl 140.
And also Lee was the greatest express bowler.