What's new

England (246 all out) beat India (146 all out) by 100 runs in the 2nd ODI at Lord's

Good shot from Jadeja. Has improved his batting a lot in last 3 years. Before that he was bits and pieces.
 
Good shot from Jadeja. Has improved his batting a lot in last 3 years. Before that he was bits and pieces.

Still can't forget his inning in the semi final of the world cup where Pandya flopped with the bat and had a strike rate of just 51. Jaddu on the other hand was batting like a prince with a strike rate of 130. :inti
 
Pandya is not great against pace he was struggling. Wanted to make up for it by bashing moeen but not be
 
Jadeja is the key here.

He can win this for India.
 
Its funny to note that now days whenever kohli is in the indian team it usually ends up loosing the game. Be it any format.
 
Wicket has gotten a lot easier since Pandya's wicket and Jadeja still can't score quickly. Leaving deliveries like a test match :91:
 
England need to hold their nerve against the lower order here, otherwise India could come back into this.
 
<b>England vs India, 2nd ODI</b>

India need 107 runs in 90 balls

ENG - 246 (49)
IND - 140/7 (35)

CRR: 4.00
RR : 7.13
 
Pitchviz ratings for bounce, bounce consistency and pace were around 8, 7 and 7 until the 27th over. Now it's 6, 3 and 5.

Jadeja was batting at a better strike rate even when Pandya was there. And now he is batting with tailenders. Your two overhyped heroes flopped today just like they did in the semi final of the world cup. Too bad there is no dhoni to take the blame today. :inti
 
English batsmen once again found Indian bowling too hot to handle as they folded out for 246.

It will be interesting to see if India will win by 10 wickets again or England will manage to take couple of wickets atleast?

Post of the week for me. :inti
 
Jadeja was batting at a better strike rate even when Pandya was there. And now he is batting with tailenders. Your two overhyped heroes flopped today just like they did in the semi final of the world cup. Too bad there is no dhoni to take the blame today. :inti

Pandya added more value to this game with both bat and ball. I know you're thick but honestly even the raw stats should be enough to see that.
 
Indian batting is very weak now with ageing top 3. Middle hasnt really existed for years now
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Golden arm 💪<br><br>Scorecard/clips: <a href="https://t.co/VpwTb5GMkV">https://t.co/VpwTb5GMkV</a><br><br>🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/ENGvIND?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#ENGvIND</a> 🇮🇳 <a href="https://twitter.com/liaml4893?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@liaml4893</a> <a href="https://t.co/vW4NpMKMn5">pic.twitter.com/vW4NpMKMn5</a></p>— England Cricket (@englandcricket) <a href="https://twitter.com/englandcricket/status/1547656592383848448?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 14, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Kohli and Dhawan are well and truly past it. If they can't batting through the innings on a tough pitch or bat at a faster strike rate on a flat pitch, there's absolutely no point playing them.
 
Pandya added more value to this game with both bat and ball. I know you're thick but honestly even the raw stats should be enough to see that.

What's up with these 'you are thick, low iq' jibes? You think I can't give it back to you? How old are you and why do guys start getting personal when the going gets tough for you?

Pandya goes missing when the chips are down. How many more example do you need? :inti
 
Wow. Pandya and Jaddu both scored 29 from 44 balls each. :91:

But Jaddu is not overhyped as a power hitter. :rabada2 :inti

Unfortunately with a career strike rate of 85 at lower middle order position in this era, you can't be overhyped as power hitters :rabada2 :inti

That strike rate needs to be 110+ for a lower middle order and this is career strike rate not a strike rate in a particular inning. :inti
 
Last edited:
Reece Topley's 6-24 today against India are the best ever figures by an England bowler in a ODI.
 
For next game,

1. Drop Shikhar Dhawan and play Rishabh Pant as opener.

2. Play Shubhman Gill or bring back Shreyas Iyer at 4. Iyer is a fine ODI player, that will be his best format. He can take his time vs pace and attack spin to keep the strike rate up in the longer format.
 
Reece Toppley - unbelievable impact on the match. Pitch was helpful especially for the new ball but you still had to bowl well and take wickets. No other player for England comes even close to the impact he had.

India need to find ways to improve their fielding/catching and improve them quick. Also Prasidh's bowling is a concern. Onwards to Old Trafford
 
I think Arshdeep should be given a game too. Prasidh and Yuzi are extreme level of tailenders really. Yuzi is such a loser, came in international cricket at same time as Bumrah who was a genuine no.11 when started but still can't hold a bat.
 
English batsmen once again found Indian bowling too hot to handle as they folded out for 246.

It will be interesting to see if India will win by 10 wickets again or England will manage to take couple of wickets atleast?

Post of the Week.
 
Indian batters are better at this. England will regret having a flat wicket.

I think a side with Roy, Bairstow, Root, Stokes and Buttler would back itself to win on a road.

Though in this case Beard and Toppers did the biz.
 
I think if Rohit doesn’t score we lose most often than not nowadays.

Surprised no Gill in the squad at all.
 
No one seems to have read the pitch correctly here, but it was not an easy surface with ball sticking and jumping oddly with consistent sideways movement. English have an average attack but they bowled very disciplined line and length. Topely was truely outstanding bowler from England and will be an interesting prospect for england going further with his height and control.

Surprised England didn't use Stokes, Carsey looks to be the week link in english attack

Plenty to on plate for India, a fledgling middle order and out of form Dhawan. What a humdinger we have on our hand on sunday
 
English batsmen once again found Indian bowling too hot to handle as they folded out for 246.

It will be interesting to see if India will win by 10 wickets again or England will manage to take couple of wickets atleast?

Well, you were right in they did take a couple of wickets

Among the other eight.

Don’t ever crow halfway through a match.
 
<b>England v India: Reece Topley takes 6-24 as hosts level series</b>

Reece Topley starred with the ball as England dug in to level their one-day international series against India with a 100-run victory in the second match at Lord's.

Topley took 6-24 - the best figures for England in a men's ODI - as the hosts expertly defended 246.

He removed openers Rohit Sharma for a duck and Shikhar Dhawan for nine before Rishabh Pant chipped a Brydon Carse full toss to mid-on on nought.

When Virat Kohli's poor form continued - he edged David Willey behind for 16 - India were 31-4.

Suryakumar Yadav halted England's charge with 27 and Hardik Pandya threatened with 29 but Topley returned to bowl Suryakumar via the inside edge and Moeen Ali had Hardik caught at the deep to effectively end India's hopes.

Topley added the wickets of Mohammed Shami, Yuzvendra Chahal and last man Prasidh Krishna to eclipse Paul Collingwood's 6-31, England's previous best ODI figures. India were bowled out for 146.

Despite slipping to 102-5, England scrapped to 246 all out in 49 overs, largely thanks to Moeen's 49.

David Willey, who was crucially dropped on one, also made 41 after leg-spinner Yuzvendra Chahal had knocked over England's powerful top order with 4-47.

The result ensures England, back at Lord's three years to the day since their World Cup win, hit back from their crushing defeat in the first ODI.

The decider takes place on Sunday at Emirates Old Trafford from 11:00 BST.

Only two bowlers - Collingwood and Chris Woakes, who has done so twice - had taken six wickets in an ODI for England.

Topley, a player whose career was almost ended by injury, joined them with a fine display with the new ball and later in the innings to cap an impressive England bowling performance.

Moeen dragged England to a score but it still looked below par.

Topley took the new ball with Willey and they began India's chase with a maiden each. In the second over, the 28-year-old Surrey quick pinned Rohit in front for a duck.

Willey was rewarded with the key wicket of Kohli, who pushed at a wide ball and nicked through to Buttler as the former captain's 32-month wait for an international century in any format goes on.

Then, the game not completely done, Topley returned - his mid-innings effort just as impressive.

Suryakumar hit 117 from 55 balls in the third T20 but Topley found a hint of bounce to remove him before he could reinvigorate another chase.

He added the wicket of Mohammed Shami with a clever slower ball before seeing off the last two with perfect line and length.

Topley has had multiple stress fractures and in 2018 considered quitting cricket. This was a memorable reward for perseverance at cricket's historic home.

England were thrashed in the first ODI on Tuesday, a defeat which came on the back of two heavy losses in the three-match Twenty20 series.

At The Oval, there were four ducks in the top five as England were dismissed for 110. This time, against a similarly impressive new-ball spell, Jason Roy, Jonny Bairstow, Joe Root and Ben Stokes all reached double figures but when each fell in the first 25 overs, plus captain Jos Buttler for four, another small total was possible.

Chahal varied his pace to outfox the top order - Bairstow bowled on the sweep for 38, Root out lbw for 11 playing the same shot and Stokes also trapped in front playing the reverse.

The difference, though, was the ability to eek out a score - something Buttler called for after Tuesday's defeat - and luck.

Moeen put on 46 with Liam Livingstone, only for the Lancashire batter to wastefully pull to deep square leg for 33.

Next came the fortune.

With the score 152-6, Willey top-edged to fine leg but Prasidh Krishna spilled a simple catch at fine leg.

That allowed a sensible stand of 62 to guide England past 200 - Moeen largely curbed his attacking instincts, although he did flick one leg-side six out of the ground.

It kept England in the game with a total that still looked below par.

Although the pitch was trickier than it first appeared, it still took a Topley-inspired performance to level the series.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/62166070
 
Very ordinary batting effort that from India.

One wonders just how much longer some of the 'superstars' can keep getting picked.
 
I was disappointed with the total put up by England.They should have score 280+ on this pitch.
 
I was disappointed with the total put up by England.They should have score 280+ on this pitch.

Really? England’s 246 might have even been slightly above par. India struggled horribly and did not even reach 150.

200 would have been a gettable chase for a quality side on this tricky pitch.
 
Excellent win by England....sets up for a beautiful decider on Sunday in Manchester.

:kp
 
I was disappointed with the total put up by England.They should have score 280+ on this pitch.

I think we are too clouded by average score these days and forget that sometimes comes along a pitch where 220-250 might be a good score.

England were 148-6 trying to go for 300. But India let them back to score 240, assuming it would be an easy ask.
 
Sharma: We didn't bat well enough

India captain Sharma was left to rue a dismal batting display from his side as they slumped to a 100-run loss chasing 247 to win.

"I thought we bowled pretty well to start with and then they had the partnership in the middle with Moeen and Willey, and I thought by no means that target wasn't chaseable. We just didn't bat well enough to get there.

"All in all, I thought we bowled pretty well and to restrict a team like to that to under 250 we did well, but we just didn't bat well.

"It's going to be an exciting one [at Old Trafford]. It's 1-1 and a lot to look forward to."
 
ODI XI :-

Rohit
Pant(wkt)
Kohli
Rahul
Pandya
SKY
Jadeja
Shami
Bumrah
Arshdeep
Chahal

Backups :-

Shaw
Iyer
D Hooda
Shardul/D Chahar
Prasidh
 
Last edited:
Highlights of the game

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Zq-OtH4XisM" title="Topley Takes Record Figures! | Highlights - England v India | 2nd Men's Royal London ODI 2022" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
No one seems to have read the pitch correctly here, but it was not an easy surface with ball sticking and jumping oddly with consistent sideways movement. English have an average attack but they bowled very disciplined line and length. Topely was truely outstanding bowler from England and will be an interesting prospect for england going further with his height and control.

Surprised England didn't use Stokes, Carsey looks to be the week link in english attack

Sad that Toppers didn’t make the WC squad having done so much in the two years before it.

I think they are keeping his bowling for the tests.
 
ODI XI :-

Rohit
Pant(wkt)
Kohli
Rahul
Pandya
SKY
Jadeja
Shami
Bumrah
Arshdeep
Chahal

Backups :-

Shaw
Iyer
D Hooda
Shardul/D Chahar
Prasidh

Jaddu, really. Though his batting has improved but bowling is abysmal. Ashwin is a better choice. India is not winning anything based on its batting but rather bowling thesedays
 
Jaddu, really. Though his batting has improved but bowling is abysmal. Ashwin is a better choice. India is not winning anything based on its batting but rather bowling thesedays

Bowling is not much a problem as Hardik and Jadeja have to fill 12-13 overs only combined.

Batting is actually a bit weak with Shami at 8 and Jadeja is a better batsman than Ashwin so Jadeja should be picked ahead. In T20s, Jadeja's bowling is generally poor but in ODIs, he is a decent option for all rounder as he can be economical.
 
He has played 200+ internationals for England. What injustice are you talking about?

In fact I think he over achieved as a test bowler.

He is a good cricketer with a lot of flaws. Can’t play pace bowling, loi type dart bowler and an average fielder but also has some good qualities like timing and power hitting and can play spin. Decent bowler. That’s about it

His numbers are a fair enough indicator of his talent. In fact would have been more surprised if he was a 50 avg bat or a below 25 avging bowler.

I think for his domestic team he played as top order bat, but for England he used as bowling AR..
 
Back
Top