What's new

England v Pakistan | 5th ODI | Rosebowl | 22/09/10 | Pak Innings

Status
Not open for further replies.
Pakistan dont even know what powerplays mean - They'll remember that they have it when Ajmal and Gul are out there! :))
 
Pak's garbage batstmen has made swine look good..Ponting and co will take him to the cleaners...they have been playing indy spinners for a long time...
 
Wont be the first time we've lost after getting a good opening stand, I remember Salman and some other guy put up around 100 while we were chasing against either Lanka or Australia and we went on to lose that as well....
 
required runrate 7.5 / over....and we have 19 more overs to bat....if anyone of them scores a big century then we have a game...
 
Wont be the first time we've lost after getting a good opening stand, I remember Salman and some other guy put up around 100 while we were chasing against either Lanka or Australia and we went on to lose that as well....

Bangalore 1996.
 
come one guys...remember what razi did in the last match...save the wickets..see through swine and then probably 4-5 good overs and it will be game on...
 
Recently Pakistani batsmen have performed poorly against all spinners. Hauritz, Vettori, Bandara, Swann, etc. This is worrying sign for WC.
 
Not to worry friends. We can still win this:

England innings (50 overs maximum) R M B 4s 6s SR
ME Trescothick b Shoaib Akhtar 0 1 1 0 0 0.00
AJ Strauss* c †Kamran Akmal b Abdul Razzaq 50 67 46 8 0 108.69
IR Bell c Mohammad Hafeez b Shoaib Akhtar 42 107 66 3 0 63.63
KP Pietersen c Mohammad Hafeez b Naved-ul-Hasan 20 26 22 3 0 90.90
PD Collingwood c Shoaib Akhtar b Naved-ul-Hasan 61 104 62 5 0 98.38
JWM Dalrymple b Naved-ul-Hasan 62 70 78 5 0 79.48
R Clarke b Abdul Razzaq 0 2 1 0 0 0.00
CMW Read† not out 21 30 20 2 0 105.00
SI Mahmood run out (Abdul Razzaq/Shoaib Akhtar) 0 3 0 0 0 -
J Lewis c Shoaib Malik b Naved-ul-Hasan 7 7 4 1 0 175.00
SCJ Broad not out 0 2 1 0 0 0.00
Extras (lb 1, w 6, nb 1) 8

Total (9 wickets; 50 overs; 209 mins) 271 (5.42 runs per over)
Fall of wickets1-0 (Trescothick, 0.1 ov), 2-79 (Strauss, 14.5 ov), 3-113 (Pietersen, 21.3 ov), 4-125 (Bell, 24.2 ov), 5-226 (Dalrymple, 43.6 ov), 6-229 (Clarke, 44.3 ov), 7-249 (Collingwood, 47.5 ov), 8-255 (Mahmood, 48.3 ov), 9-268 (Lewis, 49.3 ov)
Bowling O M R W Econ
Shoaib Akhtar 10 1 59 2 5.90 (1w)
Mohammad Asif 9 0 51 0 5.66 (2w)
Abdul Razzaq 8 0 44 2 5.50 (1nb)
Naved-ul-Hasan 10 1 57 4 5.70 (2w)
Shahid Afridi 6 0 26 0 4.33
Mohammad Hafeez 3 0 14 0 4.66
Shoaib Malik 4 0 19 0 4.75 (1w)
Pakistan innings (target: 272 runs from 50 overs) R M B 4s 6s SR
Shoaib Malik c Collingwood b Lewis 1 4 4 0 0 25.00
Mohammad Hafeez run out (Strauss) 20 26 19 2 1 105.26
Younis Khan c Trescothick b Broad 101 155 109 13 1 92.66
Mohammad Yousuf b Dalrymple 60 146 103 5 0 58.25
Inzamam-ul-Haq* not out 44 57 33 3 2 133.33
Shahid Afridi c †Read b Mahmood 0 5 3 0 0 0.00
Abdul Razzaq c & b Broad 16 21 18 1 0 88.88
Kamran Akmal† c Collingwood b Broad 0 1 1 0 0 0.00
Naved-ul-Hasan b Lewis 7 8 8 1 0 87.50
Shoaib Akhtar not out 2 5 2 0 0 100.00
Extras (lb 5, w 11, nb 7) 23

Total (8 wickets; 48.5 overs; 219 mins) 274 (5.61 runs per over)
 
I say play out the overs, play for you average Razzaq and Umar, reduce the margin as much as you can.
 
Razaq should start hitting now. May be take power play to bring back the momentum. Who knows quick 50 odd runs by these both can give Pak an outside chance.
 
If we win it's for sure a fix, loose wickets let the odds go against us, and then win.....

If we loose it for sure a fix, 60-0 drive the odds in our favor, and then loose....
 
I get it now - Pakistan waiting for Swann to end his overs and then take the PP as its hard already to play him and score off him outside the PP, then imagine how it'll be in the PP! :))
 
chalo dafa karo Razzaq ab pagal hojao aur hitting shuru kardo, now we don't care about this match. I care about Pakistan going down while fighting.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top