leatherface58
Senior T20I Player
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2011
- Runs
- 17,956
If saffers lose from here they NEVER deserved the #1 ranking. Sure there are the horrible decisions. But I think they will even out over the days.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Someone call truthseer the WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHmbulance....
Yes massive cheating. We made a our wheels more round than all the others. Pipe Down!
Oh yeah? Where did Saffers cheat like you're doing blatantly?
Haha, careful Robert, he's going to take his ball home in a minute.
English whiners trying to act tough, it's frankly downright hilarious.
But we'll see how they react, my precious, once there's a 200 run partnership
)
) Got to be trolling
English whiners trying to act tough, it's frankly downright hilarious.
But we'll see how they react, my precious, once there's a 200 run partnership
It doesn't seem hilarious from your previous posts, it sounds like you're having a massive paddy. Just appreciate the world's best bowlers in action.
It doesn't seem hilarious from your previous posts, it sounds like you're having a massive paddy. Just appreciate the world's best bowlers in action.
So what are Steyn and Morkel, donkeys?
The second best bowlers.
At home
Howz the gf Malakian? UNpacked it for the winter tour??
)
)
So what was England's bowling in the first test?
Rubbish pitch.
So how'd the Saffers get 20 wickets, RandyOz?
Heavy downpour where I am in Camden, be surprised if they come straight back out after lunch
nowt to with DRS, that was a poor umpiring decision!!!
U don't miss a chance!!
Bit of poor batting, bit of luck.
RandyOz?
Well the point is, the DRS was supposed to reduce errors in cricket. In this case, if the DRS was not there, then the umpires decision would have stood which was the right decision. If a system supposed to eradicate errors is adding its own errors, obviously system is not working?
Malakian effect. He turns up. Team suffers. Wanna watch a match here malakian. Please don't jinx your side
Only children believe in jinx's & other such fairy tails.
She's fine nish my friend, i'm cooking a nice meal for us both tonight! Couple of hours left at work & then action time![]()
Oh and this malakian troll was nowhere to be found after the first day of the first test, and suddenly he rears his ugly end :/
Early congrats to the poms. They'll probably win the test on the back of a few howlers, claim to be the best in the world, and label the saffers as chokers.
Oh and this malakian troll was nowhere to be found after the first day of the first test, and suddenly he rears his ugly end :/
Haha chill out girls. I'm off to do some work, when i return i expect the chokers to be bowled out.
Best thread in months, the bitterness is enthralling
Trolling a troll, mate. No bitterness here. I support England over every team other than us, the Saffers and the Aussies
I don't see why it's trolling to point out England's superiority, after all, we are ranked #1. We've had a patchy year, but we're still the most talented side in world cricket.
Funnily enough, that's the case with most English fans.
Well the point is, the DRS was supposed to reduce errors in cricket. In this case, if the DRS was not there, then the umpires decision would have stood which was the right decision. If a system supposed to eradicate errors is adding its own errors, obviously the system is not working?
So how'd the Saffers get 20 wickets, RandyOz?
Poor validation of your theory though. There's no control over the weather, however an umpire is expected to know the rules of the game - there should certainly be no luck involved in this aspect.First innings: clouds marched over on the first session of the second day, and reduced 270-2 or something to 380 all out.
That was the one session where the climate helped the bowlers. The cloud vanished and SA batted well on the roadiest road this side of the M25.
Second innings: scoreboard pressure.
Without the cloud in that one session, the first test would have been a high-scoring draw for sure.
So if England were just lucky with Kallis, SA were lucky with the weather at the Oval.
Luck evens out in the end, which is why a 5-match series is better than a 3-match.
Saffers back on track, rubbish bowling as usual by the Poms
Poor validation of your theory though. There's no control over the weather, however an umpire is expected to know the rules of the game - there should certainly be no luck involved in this aspect.
Do you think he has ever seen Saffers bowling in Indian pitches before crediting 'cloud cover' for those wkts. at Oval? don't think so.
It is typical of English fans, though I did not expect that statement from Robert.
Wrong.
DRS is not meant to reduce errors.
The purpose of DRS is to provide evidence which can assist Umpires in decision making.
The buck still stops at the Umpire and 3rd Umpire who interpret the evidence.
Yeah. He was was interviewed by BBC radio at the lunch break... then they have Rahul Dravid being interviewed at tea, pretty similar characters!
Duh, of course the umpire makes the final call but the whole purpose of DRS is to help reduce human errors, not provide an opportunity to introduce more
[/B]
do watch that n post a summary here
Excellent bowling by England. Still long way to go. SA can still fight back.
England bowling well here.
Rudolph bowled swann 163/6