What's new

Feeling jealous of Pakistan seamers in PSL

I heard he was training with IU squad may be as cover for Moh Hasnain, who has got fit and can be seen on IU bench.

So unfortunately he isnt part of PSL like many other talented bowlers but, only so many can play in each team. Wont be surprised if he gets a spot next year

Thats really sad bro, I mean one of your upcoming talent is being ignored for PSL. He could’ve easily replaced players like Sohail Khan, Rahat Ali, Mohd Sami, Irfan Jr etc. Anyways, PSL seemed to be giving more chances to senior players than trusting young talent.
 
Tall for Indian standards maybe :ashwin , he’s only 5’8-9.

And nope, he isn’t the playing the PSL. Franchises don’t really have any talent scouts in place.

Wow, I really didnt knew he was just 5’8-5’9. I only saw him bowl once in that QF match in U19WC against us. Anyways coming to Psl, im really surprised that PSL franchise owners have overlooked him and gone for players like Sohail Khan and Sami. If I recall correctly, Musa also has the ability to smack a few with the bat, so he could’ve been suitable for T20s. Anyways, he along with Shah Afridi are future bowling pack for Pakistan kinda like Wasim-Waqar.
 
We also played one less game, and you’ve got to take into account the fact that India had a group consisting of PNG and Zimbabwe...

Even if you take into account, it definitely does not mean that Pakistan was a much better pace bowling unit that India. The point I am trying to make is that there is not much of a difference between Pakistan and India at the moment. Even if Pakistan is better, its only marginal.
 
Pak pace bowlers have stood up pretty well in the PSL, at least they have held their own. None of them look that great either to be honest, but at least they don't look out of place, unlike their batting counterparts who look distinctly a level below the international stars they are playing with.
 
Pak pace bowlers have stood up pretty well in the PSL, at least they have held their own. None of them look that great either to be honest, but at least they don't look out of place, unlike their batting counterparts who look distinctly a level below the international stars they are playing with.

We are still recycling TTFs from the previous decade. Assessment would be valid when the current upcoming cricketers take their place. The youngsters continue to impress every time they're given a fair chance while TTFs like Hafeez, Misbah, Shafiq keep sucking the life out of teams.
 
Didn't Brendom McCullum call out the bowlers in his team for failing to execute simple bowling plans?

I mean, the likes of Luke Ronchi are running buckwild all over PSL. Let's not get too carried away now.
 
Didn't Brendom McCullum call out the bowlers in his team for failing to execute simple bowling plans?

I mean, the likes of Luke Ronchi are running buckwild all over PSL. Let's not get too carried away now.

Yeah sure we should have bowlers like Unadkhat, Thakur, Shakurs :))



Even Pakistan's worst bowler is better than India's best. The only bowler who is somewhat acceptable is Bumrah. You guys should stick to talking about batting.
 
Didn't Brendom McCullum call out the bowlers in his team for failing to execute simple bowling plans?

I mean, the likes of Luke Ronchi are running buckwild all over PSL. Let's not get too carried away now.

Luke Ronchi is one helluva a hitter. On his day he can destroy any bowling attack around the world. So let's not underestimate too much either.

The only match where he really got freebie balls was against Karachi. A lot of legside deliveries were bowled by all bowlers.
 
Yeah sure we should have bowlers like Unadkhat, Thakur, Shakurs :))



Even Pakistan's worst bowler is better than India's best. The only bowler who is somewhat acceptable is Bumrah. You guys should stick to talking about batting.

so you are saying rahat ali is better bowler than shami
 
Yeah sure we should have bowlers like Unadkhat, Thakur, Shakurs :))



Even Pakistan's worst bowler is better than India's best. The only bowler who is somewhat acceptable is Bumrah. You guys should stick to talking about batting.

Don't get carried away brother...5-0 happened to your Faast bowlers in NZ :sarf

Ind's so called thundlers with spinners won 5-1 :ashwin
 
Last edited:
Yeah sure we should have bowlers like Unadkhat, Thakur, Shakurs :))



Even Pakistan's worst bowler is better than India's best. The only bowler who is somewhat acceptable is Bumrah. You guys should stick to talking about batting.

I would take a bet that the Unadkats and Thakurs wouldn't get violated for 444 in an ODI though :))
 
I would take a bet that the Unadkats and Thakurs wouldn't get violated for 444 in an ODI though :))

Unadkhats and Thakurs won't have an overrated batting line up at 30-3 or 50-5 in a tournament final. They are better off earning cheap money in a league like IPL that produces trundlers.
 
Unadkhats and Thakurs won't have an overrated batting line up at 30-3 or 50-5 in a tournament final. They are better off earning cheap money in a league like IPL that produces trundlers.

Why such strong words for IPL riches?

Indian sponsors money going to Indian players (good / average / worst), why so much concern bro?
 
Unadkhats and Thakurs won't have an overrated batting line up at 30-3 or 50-5 in a tournament final. They are better off earning cheap money in a league like IPL that produces trundlers.

Awww.. Went a bit too far there with Indian batting considering....
 
Unadkhats and Thakurs won't have an overrated batting line up at 30-3 or 50-5 in a tournament final. They are better off earning cheap money in a league like IPL that produces trundlers.

With same overrated batting, Ind enjoying top ranking in ODI and Tests; compared to other low ranked teams who languishing at bottom ..cheers :19:
 
Yeah sure we should have bowlers like Unadkhat, Thakur, Shakurs :))




Even Pakistan's worst bowler is better than India's best. The only bowler who is somewhat acceptable is Bumrah. You guys should stick to talking about batting.

Agreed. That is why Ronchi and a bunch of washed up has been players are top scorers and destroying your best bowlers.
 
Agreed. That is why Ronchi and a bunch of washed up has been players are top scorers and destroying your best bowlers.

They are generally destroying the foreign bowlers more than the local bowlers.
 
so you are saying rahat ali is better bowler than shami

Yep. Shami has been useless in ODIs after WC 2015. His last bowling was in some Indian domestic ODI games and he was taken to the cleaners
 
Great bowling throughout the tournament, as was the case in the last two. We're seeing good pace, intelligence, change ups and ability. I hope Raees recovers fully, Hasan finds his explosiveness again and one of the younger lads gets an inclusion in the ODI squad at some stage.

However, the best bowling, imo anyway, has been from the spinners and yet again, Nawaz is looking good.
 
Also an Indian made this thread after looking at the PSL talent base, don't know why other Indians are getting their lungis in a twist.

The PSL is played by the players of the top ranked T20 side, obviously it'll have good bowlers. No need to get jealous.
 
Super bro you guys won CT.. :salute

Ind too smashed you guys in group stages, upset happens.

WC'19 will meet if not in Asia Cup ...:kohli2

Ok sounds good.... But don't hide behind results between Pakistan and other teams such as 5-0.


Face up.... Reality is we dished out a phainti to you last time we met.
 
Also an Indian made this thread after looking at the PSL talent base, don't know why other Indians are getting their lungis in a twist.

The PSL is played by the players of the top ranked T20 side, obviously it'll have good bowlers. No need to get jealous.

Bro, doesn't matter who created thread. Objective is to debate pro and cons of respective bowlers with pinch of banter..take it easy :19:
 
Only 4 foreigners in the XI.

Thanks, then max 1 or 2 forein bowlers will be playing in 11, can't conclude that only foreign bowlere are getting carted around by Ronchi and co ...(logically saying,not watched PSL, correct me if I'm wrong) !
 
Ok sounds good.... But don't hide behind results between Pakistan and other teams such as 5-0.


Face up.... Reality is we dished out a phainti to you last time we met.

JAMODI's are for banter and bait purpose, no one remembers 5-0, 5-1's after few years...

i always care WC, CT and Test series wins (away ones more) ..cheers :19:
 
Ok sounds good.... But don't hide behind results between Pakistan and other teams such as 5-0.


Face up.... Reality is we dished out a phainti to you last time we met.

IIRC most of Indian PPers have given credit to CT win to Pak. I don't remember anyone denying credit except few Pak fans (Mamoon etc)!
 
Yeah sure we should have bowlers like Unadkhat, Thakur, Shakurs :))


Even Pakistan's worst bowler is better than India's best. The only bowler who is somewhat acceptable is Bumrah. You guys should stick to talking about batting.

With all the great past and present bowlers, it is surprising to see Pak has won only one ODI WC, one T20 and one CT. They should have won much more including significant numbers of test matches away. Otherwise whats the use of such phaaaaaast bowlers who gets whitewashed in UAE and that too against SL.

Because this is discussion about bowlers I will talk only about bowlers.

Lot of times when we crticize a player or a skill (bowling/batting/fielding), many posters forget that its a team game but but but it always come to the point, player X has not won a series yet or a WC yet.
 
With all the great past and present bowlers, it is surprising to see Pak has won only one ODI WC, one T20 and one CT. They should have won much more including significant numbers of test matches away. Otherwise whats the use of such phaaaaaast bowlers who gets whitewashed in UAE and that too against SL.

Because this is discussion about bowlers I will talk only about bowlers.

Lot of times when we crticize a player or a skill (bowling/batting/fielding), many posters forget that its a team game but but but it always come to the point, player X has not won a series yet or a WC yet.

Bowlers have generally been good but there is big gap in performances between batsmen and bowlers. In no other country you find this big gap.
 
Don't think it should come as too much of a surprise that stock bowlers (i.e. pak bowlers) are of a good standard in t20 cricket. As a trait, Pakistani bowlers generally can extract more when there is less on offer, and 4 overs is a short enough period for other wider issues (tactics/fitness) not to kick in.

Take a look at Sohail Khan - very smart bowler, even in tests when he came to England. Beyond 4 overs however, things like second spells become an issue.

Generally i think Pakistan bowlers are quite good in pressure situations too, good death bowlers.
 
Too much of chest thumping for CT win (mini WC... Ind won more than once) may sound like minnow mentality,

For a team who won actual thing i.e. WC win (WC'92 once .... Ind won more than once) looks silly #JustOpinion

Can continue to celebrate ...no problem :cheers
 
Last edited:
We will have a world cup to chest thump about... you guys can keep getting hyped over bilateral wins :shh

Can you elaborate which WC you are talking about..

Ad per my knowledge last 2 WC's won by AUS (2015) :smith and INDIA (2011) :msd !
 
Last edited:
Our test bowling lineup is already better than pakistan's. In odis pak fast bowlers are better.
Rahat, irfan, sami are ttfs gul's career is already over, rumman hasn't proved anything others are good, better than india but nowhere near world class.
 
Can you elaborate which WC you are talking about..

Ad per my knowledge last 2 WC's won by AUS (2015) :smith and INDIA (2011) :msd !

2019..Pakistan will complete the troika in England. They already won T20 WC, CT there. The last time we had the round robin format, Pakistan won in 1992. The pitches, the format, the location suits Pak. They need another opener and a hitter down the order.
 
We will have a world cup to chest thump about... you guys can keep getting hyped over bilateral wins :shh
Ok bilaterals are meaningless, thats why 73-52 record doesn't even matters.
In the matches that really matter we have
humiliated your team many times. You have only ct 2017 to yell about, what about t20 wc 2007,2003 semifinal, 2011 wc sf, 1996etc etc. You are the ones who win meaningless matches more.
 
Ok bilaterals are meaningless, thats why 73-52 record doesn't even matters.
In the matches that really matter we have
humiliated your team many times. You have only ct 2017 to yell about, what about t20 wc 2007,2003 semifinal, 2011 wc sf, 1996etc etc. You are the ones who win meaningless matches more.

You beat us in 92 and we went onto win the WC, if that isn't meaningless IDK what is


You beat us in 99 and we went onto play the final, if that isn't meaningless IDK what is
 
You beat us in 92 and we went onto win the WC, if that isn't meaningless IDK what is


You beat us in 99 and we went onto play the final, if that isn't meaningless IDK what is
So pakistan and india have played total 5 matches which really matter and india leads 4-1.Now come up with another excuse
 
Hence proved, india is the better team historically as it leads 4-1 in matches that really matter. Bilaterals are worthless.
 
You beat us in 92 and we went onto win the WC, if that isn't meaningless IDK what is


You beat us in 99 and we went onto play the final, if that isn't meaningless IDK what is

No point digging that stuff...Pak leading in JAMODI's ...Ind in WC encounters vs Pak, getting bored to death with this topic :facepalm:

Like we agreed earlier in other thread....let's meet in Asia cup or WC'19 and see what happens !
 
No point digging that stuff...Pak leading in JAMODI's ...Ind in WC encounters vs Pak, getting bored to death with this topic :facepalm:

Like we agreed earlier in other thread....let's meet in Asia cup or WC'19 and see what happens !

I was just showing your compatriot the mirror where he was disregarding the bilateral results
 
No point digging that stuff...Pak leading in JAMODI's ...Ind in WC encounters vs Pak, getting bored to death with this topic :facepalm:

Like we agreed earlier in other thread....let's meet in Asia cup or WC'19 and see what happens !
You interrupted at the wrong time i was about to beat him in his own territory(worthless jamodis)
Never mind, lets stick to the topic
 
2019..Pakistan will complete the troika in England. They already won T20 WC, CT there. The last time we had the round robin format, Pakistan won in 1992. The pitches, the format, the location suits Pak. They need another opener and a hitter down the order.

Ok few PPers can see / predict the future, this is news to me ..thanks for the update bro (let me buy lottery ticket, can soome one give me winning number in advance ....just Kidding) !
 
Hence proved, india is the better team historically as it leads 4-1 in matches that really matter. Bilaterals are worthless.

The only matches that had any real consequence were

1. 96 QF
2. 2007 T20 WC final
3. 2011 WC semi



Sorry to burst your bubble :broad:
 
I was just showing your compatriot the mirror where he was disregarding the bilateral results

Natural for depending your own case with favouring stats, so mirror should be shown to both parties.

No one can take high ground...

When Ind vs Pak debate starts, the same old arguments are coming out from ages ...I'm afraid it won't stop in future as well.

On a positive note, even though we don't meet face each other, these same old repetitive banter topics are keeping the rivalry going (apart from historical political rivalry, ofcourse !) #Peace
 
Natural for depending your own case with favouring stats, so mirror should be shown to both parties.

No one can take high ground...

When Ind vs Pak debate starts, the same old arguments are coming out from ages ...I'm afraid it won't stop in future as well.

On a positive note, even though we don't meet face each other, these same old repetitive banter topics are keeping the rivalry going (apart from historical political rivalry, ofcourse !) #Peace

In a way, I'm happy that we meet less often and this makes each encounter even more special.
 
In a way, I'm happy that we meet less often and this makes each encounter even more special.

Kind of forbidden fruit Ind vs Pak encounters... Increases curiosity, expectation to extreme level for all concerned :19:
 
Pace bowling unit is developing nicely. Now we have:

Amir
Hasan Ali
Shinwari
Junaid Khan
Rumman Raees
Shaheen Afridi

All under 30 and becoming world class. Good times are coming.
 
INDIAN POSTERS just chill and enjoy pakistani pacers,these utkand,sirj etc i dont remember their names has even no match for our domestic bowlers who are not playing psl.
I can name few here.
Bashir
Waqas Ahmad.
Mohammad Musa
Hasnain
Ziaul Haq
Sadaf Hussain
Bilawal Bhatti.
 
Pace bowling unit is developing nicely. Now we have:

Amir
Hasan Ali
Shinwari
Junaid Khan
Rumman Raees
Shaheen Afridi

All under 30 and becoming world class. Good times are coming.

Amir/Hasan are world class. No question about that.

Shaheen still needs some time. He will be a super star in about 4-5yrs time. He is only 17.

Junaid Khan is average.

Rumman Raees is a trundler.

Shinwari is brittle.

So the true and the best Pak bowling pecking order should be
1) Amir
2) Hasan
3) Wahab (if he bowls like he is during this PSL, then he is world class)
4) Shaheen (Kid will be a super star someday)

Raees and Junaid can warm the bench and wait for their chance to play if any of the 4 I have mentioned are injured.
 
He is new to this stage,can bring it in to the batsaman.But has to work on his speed.

I have seen no spark in his bowling. He reminds me of Siraj from India. Trundles for the most part with occasional 140k deliveires and bowls length to get dismissed for sixes.
 
INDIAN POSTERS just chill and enjoy pakistani pacers,these utkand,sirj etc i dont remember their names has even no match for our domestic bowlers who are not playing psl.
I can name few here.
Bashir
Waqas Ahmad.
Mohammad Musa
Hasnain
Ziaul Haq
Sadaf Hussain
Bilawal Bhatti.

In that case Pakistan should win lots of away test matches.
 
Last edited:
In that case Pakistan should win lots of away test matches.

What Dr.Sahab is saying is that their street level bowlers are better than our B-Team bowlers.

If Pak is not winning away Tests in spite of having such great bowling attack, it means their batsmen are worse than the street level batsmen in other countries.
 
INDIAN POSTERS just chill and enjoy pakistani pacers,these utkand,sirj etc i dont remember their names has even no match for our domestic bowlers who are not playing psl.
I can name few here.
Bashir
Waqas Ahmad.
Mohammad Musa
Hasnain
Ziaul Haq
Sadaf Hussain
Bilawal Bhatti.

You can remove Sadaf and Zia ul haq from that list.
 
What Dr.Sahab is saying is that their street level bowlers are better than our B-Team bowlers.

If Pak is not winning away Tests in spite of having such great bowling attack, it means their batsmen are worse than the street level batsmen in other countries.
Pakistan batsmen are a handicap no fan of any other country will understand. In no other cricket team, be it international or domestic, have I seen such a disparity between the batting and bowling departments.
 
Back
Top