What's new

Flood alert issued for River Sutlej, Indus after India releases water 'without preschedule' [#23]

Abdullah719

T20I Captain
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Runs
44,825
ISLAMABAD: As tension escalates between Pakistan and India on the Kashmir issue, New Delhi has initiated water war and its attempts to circumvent the Indus Waters Treaty 1960 are also becoming visible.

The Pakistan Commission of Indus Water (PCIW) has to this effect sensitised the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to the Indian attempts to make the treaty ineffective.

The treaty ensures the water rights of lower riparian country — Pakistan — and if it is not implemented by the upper riparian — India — then it may lead to a war, endangering the world peace.

Pakistan Commissioner for Indus Waters Syed Mehar Ali Shah told The News that despite Pakistan’s repeated requests, the Indian side had not supplied advanced flood information to Pakistan, which was supposed to be supplied from 01st July to 10th October in accordance with the agreement of 1989 made by the Pakistani and Indian commissioners.

He said Pakistan had been making repeated requests to India on various aspects under the treaty, which had been stalled by India since long.

He said Pakistan’s request to India for a Special Tour of Inspection of Kishenganga hydroelectric plant and other projects in Jhelum basin remained stalled since 2014 despite a series of correspondence.

He clarified that the Indian side while denying Pakistan its right to conduct a Special Tour of Inspection had been referring all along to the adverse weather conditions or similar constraints.

He also stated that the General Tour of Inspection was arranged by India for Pakistan’s delegation on its side in February this year, which was again inordinately delayed, counting from Pakistan’s requests started since 2014.

Shah also said the matter of non-provision of advanced flood information by India was brought in the knowledge of Ministry of Foreign Affairs with a request to take up with the Indian government through regular diplomatic channel.

Shah said the treaty could be implemented if both countries fulfilled their obligations and the rights enshrined therein remain safeguarded in letter and spirit.

“Whenever the implementation of provisions of Treaty gets circumvented or delayed for one reason or the other, the treaty gets stressed which will have serious implications.

In the wake of recent denial of India to supply advanced information to Pakistan apropos 1989 agreement, I note the matter as a deep concern especially in the backdrop of not permitting Pakistan to visit Kishenganga dam as per the right given to both the countries under Article VIII (4) (d) and the other fundamental issues which are pending resolution,” he said.

He said true implementation of the treaty was lifeline for Pakistan and in case of non-implementation, it will have direct implications for Pakistan’s food security and its agrarian economy would consequently suffer which was not acceptable at any cost.

He said it was in the benefit of both the countries to implement the provisions of the treaty in letter and spirit as water was too sensitive a subject on which there should be no politics, particularly when both the countries had resolved the matter of water sharing in terms of signing of the Indus Waters Treaty in 1960.

“If the treaty implementation remains marred, the option of taking t next course of action cannot be ruled out,” he added.

https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/512336-india-making-indus-waters-treaty-ineffective
 
i doubt this will happen, but when you are down lying about gdp growth rates, nothing can be ruled out.
 
i doubt this will happen, but when you are down lying about gdp growth rates, nothing can be ruled out.

Lying? Really?

Btw do you believe that water from Indus and its distributaries and tributaries should be equally divided between India and Pakistan?
 
Btw do you believe that water from Indus and its distributaries and tributaries should be equally divided between India and Pakistan?
Lying, yes.
As for whether its equitable or not, i hope they find ways to resolve bilaterally real or imagined issues there.
 
33 million acre feet to India

80 million acre feet to Pakistan.

That seems unfair given the population of the two countries. I hope they find a way to resolve bilaterally rather than it becoming another source of tension
 
That seems unfair given the population of the two countries. I hope they find a way to resolve bilaterally rather than it becoming another source of tension

The Indus rivers are not India's main source of water, there many other Indian rivers such as Ganga, Narmada, Brahmaputra, Godavari, Krishna, Kaveri etc.

Agreements do get discarded over time when one of the signatories believe they would be better off the agreement in its current form.
 
33 million acre feet to India

80 million acre feet to Pakistan.

Indus water for thousands of years(maybe even lot longer), has been flowing that way. Pakistan did not reroute the water (they are not close to source to do that anyway), at any point in history to serve them well, rerouting this water is asking for trouble...

Secondly, Indus water is not main source of water for India, Indian rivers have different origin and pathways, Pakistan has never lay claims on them, why India should lay claim on Pakistani waters??

BTW: Indus waters originate from Tibet not India...
 
It will eventually happen if we don’t mend our ways and learn to mind our business. We are a broke country that cannot afford a war, and if India retaliates by violating the Indus Water Treaty, what option would we have? Nothing.

It will completely Pakistan journey from a broke state to a failed state, and also create a refugee situation. Hence, after 72 years of blunders, the time has come for pragmatism and picking our battles wisely.
 
It will eventually happen if we don’t mend our ways and learn to mind our business. We are a broke country that cannot afford a war, and if India retaliates by violating the Indus Water Treaty, what option would we have? Nothing.

It will completely Pakistan journey from a broke state to a failed state, and also create a refugee situation. Hence, after 72 years of blunders, the time has come for pragmatism and picking our battles wisely.

India has never violated the IWT throughout the various periods conflicts they've been involved in with Pakistan. The IWT actually gives Pakistan a very, very generous amount of water (I don't think there are many instances where the upper riparian has willingly given away such a large chunk of the available water resource).

Up until recently India didn't even bother to use their full allocation so Pakistan have benefitted from getting a bonus amount - and India only decided to take that away in a childish *** for tat move earlier this year.

The question every Pakistani civilian should be asking is, how have they let their politicians mismanage all of that extra resource and get away with blaming the enemy nextdoor for their own mismanagement.
 
IWT is one of the things which project India is an extremely good light. The past government who signed IWT and sunsequent government's who followed IWT were extremely generous. Pakistani population should understand and respect this.

Now the current scenario is different, with the current government and Anti Pakistani rhetoric growing daily, a lot of people got to know about IWT and media is focusing on IWT. As a result, IWT might be tweaked (from Indian POV).


Pakistani population need to understand the change in dynamics is result of their own governments wrong doings over the last few decades. Now they are dealing with an Indian government who is doing the same, *** for tat is never right however one needs to understand historic blunders, condemn them and then ask for support for same blunders present side is committing. Then they would get better support.
 
Indus water for thousands of years(maybe even lot longer), has been flowing that way. Pakistan did not reroute the water (they are not close to source to do that anyway), at any point in history to serve them well, rerouting this water is asking for trouble...

Secondly, Indus water is not main source of water for India, Indian rivers have different origin and pathways, Pakistan has never lay claims on them, why India should lay claim on Pakistani waters??

BTW: Indus waters originate from Tibet not India...
Tibet has been occupied by China.
 
It will eventually happen if we don’t mend our ways and learn to mind our business. We are a broke country that cannot afford a war, and if India retaliates by violating the Indus Water Treaty, what option would we have? Nothing.

It will completely Pakistan journey from a broke state to a failed state, and also create a refugee situation. Hence, after 72 years of blunders, the time has come for pragmatism and picking our battles wisely.

What sayeth you regarding all those thieves who have been looting our 'broke' country from start?

Should we raise pitchforks against them?

PS: Here I thought we were already a failed state :))
 
In its latest act of aggression against Pakistan, India has released up to 0.2 million cusecs of water into the River Sutlej without notifying the relevant authorities.

At least 150,000 to 200,000 cusecs of water from the Indian state of Punjab is expected to spill into Ganda Singh Wala – a village in Pakistan near Kasur located at the border – during the next 12 to 24 hours, the National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) warned.

India has also opened three out of five spillways of Ladakh Dam, which may lead to flooding in the nearby settlements, the NDMA added.

In view of the flood alert, the administrations of Kasur and other districts located at the bank of River Sutlej have been advised to initiate necessary measures to tackle any emergency.

Meanwhile, India has continued to resort to violations along the Line of Control. Two Pakistani civilians were martyred on Sunday in the latest bout of unprovoked firing by Indian troops along the LoC.

Two Pakistani civilians martyred by India's unprovoked firing at LoC: ISPR

The Indian Army "targeted civil population with mortars and Anti Tank Guided Missiles in Hot Spring Sector along LOC," the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) said in a statement.

The Pakistan Army in retaliatory fire reportedly killed two Indian Army soldiers and injured many others.




https://www.geo.tv/latest/245176-flood-alert-as-india-releases-water-into-river-sutlej
 
Last edited:
ECSBg-CWkAAvwex
 
Flood alert issued for River Sutlej, Indus after India releases water 'without preschedule'

The Provincial Disaster Management Authority (PDMA) of Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa issued flood alerts after India released water into River Sutlej and Alchi dam.

PDMA Punjab on Monday issued a flood alert due to rising water levels in River Sutlej after India released water into the river. Additionally, the PDMA KP director general on Sunday said that India had opened the outlets of Alchi dam "without preschedule" which, he said could lead to a flooding situation in River Indus.

According to the PDMA Punjab, flood water between the range of 125,000 and 175,000 cusecs is expected to reach Ganda Singh Wala at 11am today.

A dispatch has been issued to the relevant agencies asking them to ensure that all protective measures are taken.

The disaster management authority said that the flood alert had been issued in order to avoid the loss of lives and properties.

The Pakistan Meteorological Department (Met) has also issued a flood/weather advisory. According to the department, "very heavy to extremely heavy rainfall has been observed over the upper and lower catchments of Rivers Sutlej, Beas and Ravi during the last 72 hours".

Punjab Chief Minister Usman Buzdar has summoned an emergency meeting to discuss the flood alert for River Sutlej. During the meeting, the situation will be discussed in detail including a focus on steps taken for relief work and the security arrangements made.

According to the CM Office, various officials including the provincial disaster management minister, provincial irrigation minister, a senior member of the Federal Board of Revenue, the inspector general of police, administrative officers and officials from relief organisations will participate in the meeting. Deputy commissioners and commissioners from various areas including Sahiwal, Multan and Bahawalpur will also participate through a video link.

Meanwhile, the PDMA KP director general on Sunday wrote a letter to various provincial deputy commissioners with an alert regarding India opening the water outlet of Alchi dam.

As per the dispatch, the water would take 12 hours to reach Tarbela dam and around 15-18 hours to reach Dera Ismail Khan.

"The damming authorities at Tarbela have been instructed by [National Disaster Management Authority] NDMA to regulate the inflow and water discharge so as to overcome a flooding situation."

He directed the deputy commissioner's to restrict boating and swimming activities, adding that the catchment area near the Indus River should be monitored in order to deal with any untoward situation.

Relations between Pakistan and India have been strained since India stripped Kashmiris of the special autonomy they had for seven decades through a rushed presidential order on August 5. Following this, Pakistan resolved to downgrade diplomatic relations with New Delhi and suspended all bilateral trade.

Flood alert for New Delhi

According to Indian media reports, a flood alert has been issued for New Delhi.

India Today reported that the Delhi government issued a red-alert for the low-lying areas of the city. The report added that people living in the areas were asked to move to safer places as the water level in Yamuna River was expected to rise and "cross the danger mark" today.

Additionally, NDTV reported casualties in various parts of India in rain related incidents. At least 24 people were killed while nine others were injured in the northern state of Himachal Pradesh. The death toll in Karnataka rose to 76 while three individuals were killed in Punjab after the roof of a house collapsed.

https://www.dawn.com/news/1500403/f...fter-india-releases-water-without-preschedule
 
Why haven't pakistan built their own dams downstream?

Internal bickering and the fact that they’d rather spend their money elsewhere. Pakistan haven’t completed a new dam since the 1960s.

Speaking of which what’s happened to the dam crowdfunding?

Nevertheless if the story about India releasing water without warning Pakistan is true then that’s poor form imo.

Another reason why both nations need to make peace and work together on such things instead of the perpetual conflict.
 
Assam: 107 die and four million people displaced in worst floods for years

Devastating floods in India's northeastern state of Assam have killed 107 people and displaced more than four million.

Around 28 of the state's 33 districts have been affected, making it one of the worst floods in recent times.

About 50,000 people have been rendered homeless and relocated to 649 relief camps set up by the government, while 3,000 villages have been inundated with flooding and 130,000 hectares of farmland damaged as a result.

The Central Water Commission of India issued a severe flood alert, warning the waters of the Brahmaputra river will continue to rise until Monday evening.

This disaster comes at a time when the state and the country are fighting the coronavirus pandemic. The destruction of livelihood and crops will further add to the economic burdens people are facing.

An estimated 3.4 million animals have also been affected by the floods. According to Assam state officials, more than 100 animals including nine rhinos, wild buffalo, deer and wild boar have died.

More than 85% of the famous Kaziranga National Park and Tiger Reserve is under flood water. The reserve houses the Bengal tiger, as well as elephants and the rare one-horned Indian rhino.

More than 2,400 rhinos of this species inhabit the park, while there is a high concentration of the endangered tiger.

On their India tour in April 2016, the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge spent two days in Assam and visited Kaziranga National Park.

The couple met with the anti-poaching squad in Bimoli camp and went on a safari and saw rhinos, elephants and deer.

In some of the most memorable scenes of the trip, the couple had fun feeding milk to baby elephants and saw rhinos being cared for at a wildlife rehabilitation centre.

William and Kate also visited the Asian Elephant Learning centre and Clinic set up by Mark Shand, the late brother of the Duchess of Cornwall, who devoted his life to the protection and care of elephants.

The Kaziranga ecosystem is prone to floods as it is sandwiched between the mighty Brahmaputra river and Karbi Anglong - hills sprawling with rare and untouched flora and fauna.

With the exception of the year 2018, floods have affected more than 60% of Kaziranga National Park every year since 2016. This year has been one of the worst.

Scientists have attributed the frequent occurrence of floods to climate change.

https://news.sky.com/story/assam-10...-displaced-in-worst-floods-for-years-12031849
 
September 19 marks the 60th anniversary of the Indus Water Treaty (IWT) between India and Pakistan, a treaty that is often cited as an example of the possibilities of peaceful coexistence that exist despite the troubled relationship. Well-wishers of the treaty often dub it “uninterrupted and uninterruptible”. The World Bank, which, as the third party, played a pivotal role in crafting the IWT, continues to take particular pride that the treaty functions.

The role of India, as a responsible upper riparian abiding by the provisions of the treaty, has been remarkable but the country, of late, is under pressure to rethink the extent to which it can remain committed to the provisions, as its overall political relations with Pakistan becomes intractable.

Back in time, partitioning the Indus rivers system was inevitable after the Partition of India in 1947. The sharing formula devised after prolonged negotiations sliced the Indus system into two halves. The three ‘western rivers’ (Indus, Jhelum and Chenab) went to Pakistan and the three ‘eastern rivers’ (Sutlej, Ravi and Beas) were portioned to India. Equitable it may have seemed, but the fact remained that India conceded 80.52 per cent of the aggregate water flows in the Indus system to Pakistan. It also gave Rs 83 crore in pounds sterling to Pakistan to help build replacement canals from the western rivers. Such generosity is unusual of an upper riparian.

India conceded its upper riparian position on the western rivers for the complete rights on the eastern rivers. Water was critical for India’s development plans. It was vital, therefore, to get the waters of the ‘eastern rivers’ for the proposed Rajasthan canal and the Bhakra Dam without which both Punjab and Rajasthan would be left dry, severely hampering India’s food production. Jawaharlal Nehru, while inaugurating the Bhakra Canals in 1963, described it as “a gigantic achievement and a symbol of the nation’s energy and enterprise”.

In Pakistan, however, it was an occasion of strong resentment, grieving that India got away with the total flow of 33 million acre-feet on the eastern rivers “virtually for a song”. Nehru was always conscious that the Bhakra Canals should not be at the cost of reduced water supplies to Pakistan. However, he was also very clear that India’s interest on the eastern rivers should be protected hoping that the two countries should someday come to live “amicably and cordially as the United States and Canada live in North America”.

https://indianexpress.com/article/e...re-is-a-need-to-give-it-a-fresh-look-6601741/
 
ISLAMABAD:Pakistan will discuss with India a host of issues under the Indus Waters Treaty, including objections to the designs of Pakal Dul and Lower Kalnai hydroelectric plants during a meeting of Permanent Indus Commission (PIC) in New Delhi next week, the Foreign Office said on Friday.

At the talks on Tuesday and Wednesday, Pakistan’s delegation, led by Indus Waters Commissioner Meher Ali Shah, will include officials from the relevant departments, Foreign Office spokesperson Zahid Hafeez Chaudhri told a weekly news briefing here.

Under the provisions of the Indus Waters Treaty, 1960, the Permanent Indus Commission is required to meet at least once a year. The next meeting on March 23-24 will be 116th session of the commission. The forum discusses the water-related issues falling under the 1960 treaty.

During the meeting, Spokesperson Zahid Hafeez Chaudhri told reporters, Pakistan would discuss with India a host of issues, including “our objections on the designs of Pakal Dul and Lower Kalnai hydroelectric plants”.

In response to a query, Chaudhri said that Pakistan had always emphasised the need for a meaningful dialogue and peaceful resolution of all outstanding disputes with India, including the core issue of Jammu and Kashmir.

When asked about Indian foreign secretary’s statement regarding meaningful Pakistan-India dialogue, Chaudhri said such statements were not helpful in resolution of the disputes which were a hurdle in the way of peace and stability in the region.

“Jammu and Kashmir is an internationally-recognised dispute and the core issue between India and Pakistan. Pakistan has always underscored the need for a meaningful dialogue and peaceful resolution of all outstanding disputes with India,” he maintained.

He said that the Kartarpur initiative by Pakistan despite several challenges and the return of captured Indian pilot Abhinandan after the shooting down of two Indian fighter jets by the Pakistan Air Force were also indicative of Pakistan’s desire for lasting peace in the region.

“The onus is, therefore, on India to create the enabling environment necessary for a ‘meaningful engagement’. The current situation in IIOJK is neither tenable nor acceptable. India needs to take corrective measures in IIOJK to move forward,” he remarked.

The spokesperson said that the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) is in touch with India on the issue of Cricket World Cup. Chaudhri reminded that provision of security to the players is the responsibility of the host country.

Afghan peace

The spokesman said a meeting on the Afghan peace process was under way in Moscow in which representatives of the US, Russia, Qatar, Afghanistan and Pakistan are participating. Pakistan’s Special Representative for the Afghan Process Muhammad Sadiq is representing Pakistan.

The spokesperson urged all Afghan sides to work together for an inclusive, broad-based and comprehensive political settlement. He also supported an orderly and responsible withdrawal of foreign troops from Afghanistan “as a precipitous withdrawal would create a vacuum for spoilers”.

About Pakistan’s view on US-China relations, the Foreign Office spokesperson said that Islamabad enjoyed friendly and cooperative relations with both Beijing and Washington.

“China is Pakistan’s time tested and all-weather strategic cooperative partner,” he said. “Pakistan also has longstanding comprehensive partnership with the US based on convergence of interests on a whole range of issues,” he added.

The spokesperson mentioned the role of a bridge played by Pakistan between the US and China in the past and said: “Pakistan continues to pursue policies that promote cooperation, peace and stability in the region and beyond.”

The spokesman said that the issue of visas was discussed in detail during the visit of the Kuwaiti foreign minister to Pakistan, adding that both the countries stressed the need for resolving this issue soon.

(With input from APP)

https://tribune.com.pk/story/2290361/pakistan-will-object-to-2-indian-hydro-projects-in-water-talks
 
ISLAMABAD: India has accelerated its construction works on the 850MW Ratle Hydropower project and completed the 330MW Kishenganaga hydropower project on Pakistani rivers with objectionable designs, taking advantage of a World Bank halt in the mediation process between the two countries five years ago, The News reported.

The World Bank's top management, which had served as a mediator to resolve Pakistan's objections to the Indus Waters Treaty, took a pause on December 12, 2016, and suspended the process, asking the two countries to consider alternative ways to resolve their disagreements on both projects.

Pakistan was the first to approach the World Bank, requesting the establishment of an arbitration court to decide the destiny of the Kishenganga hydropower project, which is operational on the Jhelum River, and the 850MW Ratle hydropower project, which is under construction on the Chenab River. Later, India requested that the World Bank appoint neutral experts to address Pakistan's concerns about the designs of both projects.

According to the World Bank, the appointment of a chairman of the Court of Arbitration, as requested by Pakistan, and a neutral expert, as requested by India, to resolve issues concerning two hydroelectric power plants under construction by India along the Indus rivers system were halted. The bank says that initiating both processes by Pakistan and India at the same time increases the risk of contradictory outcomes, which potentially endanger the Treaty.

Top sources in the water resources ministry and the Pakistan Commission of Indus Water told The News that India, not only has rampant up the construction work on its projects , taking advantage of the World Bank's halt, but has also submitted to the United Nations its final design of the Ratle project without allaying the concerns of Pakistan for qualifying the carbon credits.

In 2017, India completed the Kishenganga project with an objectionable design, one year after the World Bank put a stop to it, and now it is resuming construction on the Ratle Hydropower project site with a design that does not comply with the provisions of the Water Treaty, as Pakistan has objected. On April 3, 2018, Pakistan wrote to the World Bank, claiming that the Bank's suspension had given the Indian side time to construct the Kishenganga project.

And, if the Ratle project is finished in the midst of the World Bank's ongoing pause, Pakistan will be forced to accept a 40% reduction in water flows slated for Sialkot Headmarala. This means that irrigation of numerous crops in Punjab, the country's food basket, will be severely harmed. Once finished, the Ratle project will have a direct impact on the country's food supply.

When contacted, Syed Mehr Ali Shah, joint secretary in the Water Resources Ministry and acting Pakistan's Commissioner of Indus Waters, said he is in contact with the World Bank and that Pakistan has asked the World Bank to end the pause and establish a court of arbitration because India may take advantage of the pause. He also asserted that the World Bank had offered to mediate between the two countries, but that no progress had been made.

“We are optimistic that the World Bank will come up with a positive mind on the issue in response to the latest communication from Pakistan," he said.

Shah said that Pakistan was the first country to approach the World Bank, requesting the establishment of an arbitration court, and that India followed suit, asking the World Bank to select a neutral expert. He stated that when a party asks the World Bank for a neutral expert or a court of arbitration, the Bank should first listen to that party. The World Bank plays a role in the Indus Waters Treaty's dispute resolution process because it is also a party to the dispute between Pakistan and India. Pakistan had requested that the issues over the Kishenganga hydropower project on the Neelum River and the 850 MW Ratle hydropower project on the Chenab River be resolved.

Pakistan's objections
Pakistan believes that the poundage of the Kishenganga should be reduced to one million cubic metres instead of 7.5 million cubic metres, and that the intake should be increased to four metres and the spillways raised to nine metres.

Pakistan had four objections to the Rattle project. The freeboard should be one metre rather than two metres, the poundage should be eight million cubic metres rather than 24 million, the intake level should be 8.8 metres, and the spillways should be 20 metres high.

In his comments, Arshad H Abbasi, a member of the SDPI who has worked extensively on transboundary water issues with India under the Track-II Policy, claimed that Pakistan's Commission of Indus Waters has never raised genuine concerns about the Ratle Hydropower project, arguing that it hasn't raised the project's seismic vulnerability or structural stability.

It has also failed to persuade the World Bank to end the delay, which is still in place and preparing the path for the project to be completed with an undesirable design. He further alleged that the Pakistan Commission of Indus Water is not up to date on the progress of the Ratle project's construction.

Engr M A Jabbar, who monitors water-related issues with India, said the government lacks knowledge-based professionals to provide accurate technical input to its negotiators and lawyers in order to fight its case both at the bilateral level at the PCIW (Permanent Commission of Indus Waters) and in international forums.

According to top sources, India has completed significant civil works on the Ratle project, including two diversion tunnels, an upstream bridge, and upstream and downstream roads, and will soon begin construction on the dam portion, which will reach a height of nearly 134 metres. The Indian authorities plan to take advantage of the World Bank's hiatus by starting construction on the pressure shaft and power house as soon as possible.

The Ratle project, which is located in the J&K state's Kishtwar region, is fundamentally located in the central crystalline sequences of the Higher Himalaya. This area has experienced significant tectonic deformation as well as seismic activity.

Jammu is about 215 kilometres away from the project. The closest functioning airport is in Jammu, while the nearest railhead is in Udhampur, which is roughly 155 kilometres away from the project site. A foot track connects the left bank of the dam site to the Jammu-Kishtwar motor road near Drabshala.

The highway runs along the river's left bank. The distance between project components is approximately 129 kilometres, while the aerial distance from Head Marala is around 129 kilometres.

The Ratle Dam, with a gross reservoir capacity of 18,646 acres and a live storage capacity of 8,107 acres, but a height of 191 feet, could have a tremendous impact on Pakistan if it fails. It's upstream from dams like Baglihar and Sawalkot that are being built, as well as the Salal Hydropower Project, which is already operational.

https://www.geo.tv/latest/396184-pa...ld-banks-pause-in-mediation-damaging-pakistan
 
Back
Top