jnaveen1980
T20I Captain
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2016
- Runs
- 41,258
Smith will on the fly invent a technique now lol
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But PAK has bowled well enough to get two - I happens on such condition when ba is doing something & batmen are never set. Aussies could have gone to lunch 4 down in some other daysTwo gifted wickets by Aus here.
Yes, Aus could have been easily 3 down with many misses, but both batsmen survived those and then played poor shot to get out.But PAK has bowled well enough to get two - I happens on such condition when ba is doing something & batmen are never set. Aussies could have gone to lunch 4 down in some other days
If it remains like this all days then 300+ and game will be done.If this is going to be like this all days this test will be a short on e.
that’s why I believe PAK missed a trick here. Australia is brutal when they are ahead in the game, but had PAK batted first and posted 200+ it could have been a completely different ball game.Yes, Aus could have been easily 3 down with many misses, but both batsmen survived those and then played poor shot to get out.
It's great for Pakistan and now they are actually giving less hit me balls as well.2 runs partnership in 33 balls
REflexes have waned. His usual funky shots don't come off.What happened to smith? Is he past his prime?
Sometimes channel bowling is all you need to do in these conditions.It's great for Pakistan and now they are actually giving less hit me balls as well.
They just need to keep bowling in channel. These two are not going to play shots and sooner or later get out while defending.Sometimes channel bowling is all you need to do in these conditions.
No it was the right call to bowl first. You clearly were not watching from the start, when the ball was moving dangerously. Pakistan should obviously bowl when conditions are best for bowling, especially with their weaker bowling line up and less experienced batting lineup (which would have to face one of the best bowling attacks in the world in difficult conditions).Yes, Aus could have been easily 3 down with many misses, but both batsmen survived those and then played poor shot to get out.
that’s why I believe PAK missed a trick here. Australia is brutal when they are ahead in the game, but had PAK batted first and posted 200+ it could have been a completely different ball game.
What? Under 300 should be the goal.We should try and keep them under 550
He's had this habit for a while.Smith should have been gone but once again our brilliant keeper thinks he knows best and stands 2 feet behind where he should be
Until we improve our yo yo fitness test results and hit level 19 instead of 17 and improve our fielding we won't win in Australia ever.What better than overcast condition for a bowler? Pakistan should have used the condition more and taken 2 more wickets. Dropped catch is not helping anybody here. Bowlers are working hard though but fielding let them down once again.
Could be, but it’s a two innings game. It’s really difficult to compete with Australia in Australia batting second. Long back, at SCG on a far difficult condition AUS was like 70/6 & 127 all out on first morning, still went in to win the game. I think PAK’s best chance was to put a target on board combined two innings & get Aussie off guard on last innings on an uneven surface & a large ground. Even had they got Australia 80/5 at first lunch, still Aussies would have batted second time without any pressure & most likely under best batting conditions.No it was the right call to bowl first. You clearly were not watching from the start, when the ball was moving dangerously. Pakistan should obviously bowl when conditions are best for bowling, especially with their weaker bowling line up and less experienced batting lineup (which would have to face one of the best bowling attacks in the world in difficult conditions).
A shorten game is bettter for Pakistan more chances of moral victory
tomorrow will be better batting wicketEven 300 is looking like a good total here
You create luck not dropping catches like thesewhy the luck always favours aussies.
Dont think so. Forecast is for rains and similar overcast conditions. If any, it might swing even more. Conditions are more Eng and NZ than aus, but then thats Melbourne - 4 seasons in one daytomorrow will be better batting wicket
7PMDo they play until 9pm Aus time ?
tomorrow’s forecast is better last time i checked aussie batting is not that stronger like it looks just take out warner all other are not intimidating.Dont think so. Forecast is for rains and similar overcast conditions. If any, it might swing even more. Conditions are more Eng and NZ than aus, but then thats Melbourne - 4 seasons in one day
Last 3 Tests at the MCG were all won by the side batting second. Considering the amount of swing these new kookaburras have offered in these conditions, it was absolutely the right decision to bowl first.Yes, Aus could have been easily 3 down with many misses, but both batsmen survived those and then played poor shot to get out.
that’s why I believe PAK missed a trick here. Australia is brutal when they are ahead in the game, but had PAK batted first and posted 200+ it could have been a completely different ball game.
This is a defensive move as some suggested here rather than offensive move. THey did not want a blow out scenario hence opted to bowl rather than trying to run through Aussies. Speeds at the start of the innings was indicative of that. They were not bending their back to win the first session big. Terry o keefe has mentioned in an article how Australia is very keen on winning first two sessions of a Test. That is their standard template.Last 3 Tests at the MCG were all won by the side batting second. Considering the amount of swing these new kookaburras have offered in these conditions, it was absolutely the right decision to bowl first.
Problem is that PAK are a toss-agnostic and a pitch-agnostic team especially in these conditions. They can neither bat long enough nor can their bowlers take a heap of wickets. So they lose regardless of the outcome of the toss.
Had PAK batted first here, the OZ trio would have bowled PAK out for 180 odd.
yes. His skiddy accuracy would have been handful.But i doubt Australia will do horse for courses. THey will hope Marsh chips inIn these conditions, Boland is better than Starc, Cummins, Josh. Don't think any batting lineup presently can play Boland on this pitch.