What's new

Hypothetical scenario - World Cup Final 2023 is tied: How will the ICC decide the winner?

DHONI183

A departed friend who will live in our memories fo
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Runs
24,842
Post of the Week
8
It´s just a fun thread. Take it with a pinch of salt.

So, what if the World Cup Final of the next edition too is tied? How will the ICC decide the winner? What are your guesses?

Let your humour take over, fellows.

Let me start: the team with the most number of married players will be declared as winners. If still tied, divorces formerly happened too will be taken into consideration.
 
World Cup Final 2023 is tied: how will the ICC decide the winner? (fun thread!)

Also, no England team fan should take it to mean that the purpose herewith is to undermine their achievement. I´m myself a huge fan of their transformed Limited-Overs team and was supporting them over the West Indies in the World T20 Final 2016. I congratulate them once again for lifting the trophy. :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
this thread should be fun...i look forward to reading PP'ers contributions...cmon fellas....let ur imaginations loose....cheers:)
 
simple if India is one of the teams then to prevent a riot and the umpires getting lynched they will halt play, call fora strategic MRF timeout, check the video replays, cut the feed for a quick second, then award the cobra beer sponsored decision to the Nike Blue blood team india..

the decision would be announced after a rousing number by the IPL cheerleaders and various bollywood stars taking selfies with the umpires..

the opposition will be told to wait at the boundary line as the ground is now off limits to them..

Once the final decision is announced Modi would arrive in a helicopter and lead a giant yoga session..the cup would then be annointed with special oils,yoghurt and milk to keep out the evil eye from the opposition. The opposing team would be declared Pakistanis and then quickly rushed from the stadium..

cue big fireworks..(followed by a lynching of a beef eating Muslim just for entertainment purposes)..

No one will talk about that measly 2019 WC final again after this one..
 
They have to keep bowling super over until decided :) or share the trophy. You cannot use this dodgy rule to decide the winner.
 
The winner should be decided by conducting a yawning competition.
Or a Pizza burger eating competition :yawn :yawn :yawn
 
More super overs till the match is decided

It's like penalties, keep on going till it is decided. The rule of number of boundaries, head to head in pervious encounter or point table standing shouldn't decide anything.
 
Simple even if match is tied and let's say India is not in the final just give the trophy to India
 
My father often relates to me the story of how he and his cousin Zaka (may his soul rest in peace) once won a challenge of eating two kilos of mitthaayi (sweets) dipped in milk. Something like that sounds like a better idea than the way the Final on Sunday was decided. :yk

Simple even if match is tied and let's say India is not in the final just give the trophy to India

Or get Ravi Shastri to say "Tracer bullet" for both the teams. For whichever of the two he says it quicker, that team shall be declared the winner.
 
No one wins. They will say the 2019 champions will continue as champions.
 
they will look at the mob in the stand and give it to India..no matter what..even if they dont reach the final..lol
 
If 1 over is used to decide 20 overs match
Use 1/20*50 approx 3 overs to decide 50 over match
 
If you leave it to England, they will come up with ridiculous rules like "Most diverse team should win" "Country that ruled most countries should win"
 
If 1 over is used to decide 20 overs match
Use 1/20*50 approx 3 overs to decide 50 over match

Although the purpose of this thread isn´t serious suggestions, but I kind of liked this one. Just one over as a tie-breaker to follow a whole 100-overs ODI match doesn´t fit into things perhaps. Three overs, well, I wouldn´t mind it. It´s still a some kind of a mini-match which would follow, and eliminates the risk of yourself losing based on just one bad over. So yeah, I like this.
 
I understand the thought principle that there needs to be 1 winner. Years of preparation, thousands spent on marketing/promotion, all of the hype, it would be anti climax if there's 2 winners...BUT...In my opinion, if a game AND the super over is tied, then the trophy should be shared. Let's be honest, tied games are rare enough, let alone the super overs also being tie, and if this chain of events was to happen again in the future, it should be shared, but tbh I had never thought about this before as the chances were always so unlikely.

If NZ and England were to play each other 100 more times, highly unlikely any games would finish in a tie, and the resulting super over would also be a tie. People are saying they should have a super over again in case of a tied super over, but I'm not sure that would work. It's not the same as penalty shoot outs where penalties are quick (as in when it gets to sudden death), it would be too time consuming and impractical to repeat a super over multiple times.
 
If game is tied, check how many wickets each team lost. Whoever lost less wickets should be the winner.

If number of wickets lost are same, then use Super Over.

If still tie, then use NRR from group stage.

If still tie, then whoever has better ICC ranking should be champion.

No sharing trophy please.
 
Just do it on fewest wickets lost like as in time immemorial.
 
The winner will be decided by the number of traumatised Indians as a result of the 2019 World Cup campaign! that also includes the Indians posing as Kiwi fruits! Yummmy Yummy! 1 of 5 a day! or 5 of 5, on a beautiful Lords Sunday! [MENTION=7774]Robert[/MENTION]

hqdefault.jpg
 
Last edited:
The winner will be decided by the number of traumatised Indians as a result of the 2019 World Cup campaign! that also includes the Indians posing as Kiwi fruits! Yummmy Yummy! 1 of 5 a day! or 5 of 5, on a beautiful Lords Sunday! [MENTION=7774]Robert[/MENTION]

How about Trial by Combat? :afridi v :kohli

Pakistan win. :)
 
Just do it on fewest wickets lost like as in time immemorial.
Is that uncle Robert indirectly admitting that England "won" due to a stupid rule? :D

Jokes apart, congratulations on your team´s performance, sir. Well done! :)

The winner will be decided by the number of traumatised Indians as a result of the 2019 World Cup campaign! that also includes the Indians posing as Kiwi fruits! Yummmy Yummy! 1 of 5 a day! or 5 of 5, on a beautiful Lords Sunday! [MENTION=7774]Robert[/MENTION]

hqdefault.jpg

In a thread of DHONI183, to post a picture of MS Dhoni being in tears, is a display of lack of manners and respect on your part. It is inhumane. It just shows that there´s no difference between yourself and an animal; that too a very bad kind of animal. Hyenas or something. I demand immediate action from the UNO!
 
India Vs Pakistan final and match tied. Online poll on PP to decide which country gets the world cup. Indians win :)
 
If super over tied. Just go to bowl out and keep on carrying on in sudden death mode till winner
 
The winner should be decided by the team that has hit the most 6s, if thats a tie, then it should be the team who has hit the most spectators in the head!!!
 
simple if India is one of the teams then to prevent a riot and the umpires getting lynched they will halt play,

You mean something like this?

https://www.espncricinfo.com/series...-india-3rd-odi-india-tour-of-pakistan-1989-90

or this?

https://www.espncricinfo.com/series...-india-2nd-odi-india-tour-of-pakistan-1997-98

or this?

https://www.espncricinfo.com/series...and-3rd-test-england-tour-of-pakistan-1968-69

I know there is crowd trouble in India too, but Pakistan is ahead of India in the count of abandoned matches due to crowd trouble.
 
It´s just a fun thread. Take it with a pinch of salt.

So, what if the World Cup Final of the next edition too is tied? How will the ICC decide the winner? What are your guesses?

Let your humour take over, fellows.

Let me start: the team with the most number of married players will be declared as winners. If still tied, divorces formerly happened too will be taken into consideration.

Compare the marks obtained by the captains of the two teams in their 12th standard exam.
 
How about Trial by Combat? :afridi v :kohli

Pakistan win. :)

That wouldn't be fair to the rest of the world. We all know Pakistanis are all warriors and gladiators. No one will stand a chance if it's decided by combat. How can anyone win against imam, Babar, sarfaraz, fakhar, etc with their warrior like physique and gladiator type upbringing. :shafiq2
 
Compare the marks obtained by the captains of the two teams in their 12th standard exam.

Good one!

The captain with better relations with his mother-in-law should be declared a winner. If still tied, the captain who has paid the bigger amount of money on his wife´s shopping expenses will get the nod.
 
Back
Top