India (399/5) defeat Australia (217) by 99 runs (DLS target 317) to win the 2nd ODI

So do PPers still believe that India somehow get the better of the conditions?
No I mean if india can win this which looks likely then its just an absolute domination here. Full credit to India.

I guess with India being very good, it's a matter of whether they can hold their nerves in ko stages. Same with Pakistan, Aussies and whoever makes semis. 2 games under pressure. Whoever handles it best will win.
 
Warner is looking in good touch. If Warner played untill 30 over then Australia have very good chance of chasing this score
 
This mindset is what never allowed fast bowlers to flourish in our country since the days of Pataudi
It has changed honestly and that’s why we have superb pacers these days .

But we aren’t obsessed with pace. With the advent of bowling machines , raw pace bothers batsmen much lesser these days . Seam , Swing , Guile with good pace is far more important
 
We were lost that game due to batsman not becouse bowlers .
Point is not why we lost but about the selection. Shami was one of the top wicket takers in that tournament and certainly for India while playing half the matches. Bhuvi was chosen over Shami for his better batting and he was out for 0. This make belief world of Indian cricket where they assume that Thakur will win a match with bat, and hence Shami won't play is what irks me.
 
Good thing about Ashwin is whole year he works on his youtube channel but come world cup he becomes part of Indian team.
 
Prasidh is impressive. He looks like the next guy in line.

And for your information, i dint say Pace is everything. You need skill like swing. Bounce etc but pace with either one of the above or a combo of the listed skills above makes the bowler deadly

Most top bowlers had the ability to bowl at pace in conjunction with either ability to swing or bowl with consistent bounce.

Look at McGrath Ambrose and garner etc. They are not the quickest yet they were effective. Why? Cause they have the ability to generate bounce at hard lengths and then can manipulate their lengths at will.

You can't just be a pure swing bowler. You will never succeed in non bowling friendly conditions. To be an all conditions type bowler you need pace plus bounce.

Even McGrath and co were quick in their prime at around 135-140. He only bowled 125-130 once he turned 33 etc.

You don't need express pace but you still need pace. I hope that makes sense.
 
Will it be rainy mostly in India during the world cup in the locations selected?
I remember chennai being dry when we won the test match there.
 
This Indian team is getting scarier by the day.

Pakistan would be hoping that India lands on the field with overconfidence on 14 October.
India- Pakistan match is totally dependent on Shaheen first spell . if Shaheen take 2 wickets in first 5-6 over then it's Pakistan game.
 
I think India is a genuine contender for the WC. They have a very good team. All departments covered. They have three top line fast bowlers, plenty of spin options of different varieties and a very good batting line up.

In the ongoing series, they are missing almost half of their first choice eleven. Still they are just pretty much steam rolling. That too not any team, Australia.

I would say a lot of credit goes to Dravid for putting together this set of players. Also to VVS Laxman to get KL Rahul and Shreyas Iyer match ready.
 
I think India is a genuine contender for the WC. They have a very good team. All departments covered. They have three top line fast bowlers, plenty of spin options of different varieties and a very good batting line up.

In the ongoing series, they are missing almost half of their first choice eleven. Still they are just pretty much steam rolling. That too not any team, Australia.

I would say a lot of credit goes to Dravid for putting together this set of players. Also to VVS Laxman to get KL Rahul and Shreyas Iyer match ready.
Fielding department is not upto the mark.
 
This is how you build bench strength. All those losses during useless bilaterals that were doled out due to sending B teams was to identify the guys who can potentially be the backup to the main team. Now, they're all showing up in unison.

I also believe we're not peaking early but rather peaking at the right time. Anyways, the great teams never worked that way. They won everything without any notions of peaking at the right time or peaking far too early.
 
Also depends upon the initial swing we get that day. Unlike Naseem who can seam the ball both ways off the pitch, Shaheen relies more on swing. Naseem would've been a greater threat on any surface, 'IF' he pitched the ball fuller. He always bowled the defensive good length / back of a good length, so he always missed the edge. So, if those initial 2 overs of Shaheen can be negated and positive intent can be shown, then we stand a terrific chance.
India- Pakistan match is totally dependent on Shaheen first spell . if Shaheen take 2 wickets in first 5-6 over then it's Pakistan game.
 
This is how you build bench strength. All those losses during useless bilaterals that were doled out due to sending B teams was to identify the guys who can potentially be the backup to the main team. Now, they're all showing up in unison.

I also believe we're not peaking early but rather peaking at the right time. Anyways, the great teams never worked that way. They won everything without any notions of peaking at the right time or peaking far too early.
Almost all top teams do that not only to manage the workload but also prepare for the impending transition.
 
The rain has passed and the covers are off. Play to resume in 10 minutes
Revised target is 317 off 33 overs, which means Australia now need 261 more runs in 24 overs.
 
The rain has passed and the covers are off. Play to resume in 10 minutes
Revised target is 317 off 33 overs, which means Australia now need 261 more runs in 24 overs.
Australia have chance now .they just need 10.50 Run per over which is avarage at his Venue
 
Three bowlers can bowl a maximum of seven overs while two bowlers can bowl six overs each.
This means both prasidh and Shami can Bowl 3 over each .
 
Thakur is bowling rubbish as usual .hope we don't Play him in world cup

Surely Indian batting is so strong don't need him. Shami as 3rd seamer is deadly.

Gill
Rohit
Virat
Iyer
Rahul
Sky
Pandya
Jadeja
Shami/Ashwin
Kuldeep
Bumrah
Siraj

Deadly team
 
Surely Indian batting is so strong don't need him. Shami as 3rd seamer is deadly.

Gill
Rohit
Virat
Iyer
Rahul
Sky
Pandya
Jadeja
Shami/Ashwin
Kuldeep
Bumrah
Siraj

Deadly team
Is India being allowed to play 12?
One of Iyer and sky will have to sit out. I think Iyer
 
Thakur is bowling rubbish as usual .hope we don't Play him in world cup
Playing these Half baked 'Dual role' bowlers like Thakur was the prime reason we were bashed in the CT'17 finals. We never seem to learn anything at all. Either play good allrounders who are dependable atleast in 1 of the 2 skills ; if that option is not there then play specialists.
 
Three quick wickets for Ashwin and Australia are now 5-101

All eyes on Alex Carey now
 
Back
Top