What's new

India v S Lanka | 3rd Test | Mumbai | 2-6 Dec 09

Status
Not open for further replies.
We all know about Indians and their obsession with averages, stats, records etc so it's tremendous that Sehwag couldn't get his 300.

Shame this series has been so ridiculously one sided....they have had all the luck and the pitches have been atrocious......could we do a rain dance tonight?
 
Would have liked to wrap it up today itself. Anyway, the pressure is on Sri Lanka, and we are more than likely to win this Test. The next Test series we'll play is against Bangladesh, and we are likely to white wash them (hopefully). So the #1 spot will be ours at least till the Test series against S.A on March next year.
 
Bublu Bhuyan said:
Would have liked to wrap it up today itself. Anyway, the pressure is on Sri Lanka, and we are more than likely to win this Test. The next Test series we'll play is against Bangladesh, and we are likely to white wash them (hopefully). So the #1 spot will be ours at least till the Test series against S.A on March next year.

What if we white wash Australia then ? :akhtar
 
Bublu Bhuyan said:
Remains to be seen. Probably you'll jump about 3 spots ahead with Australia taking a nose dive to the 6th spot.


i thought we will be No-1 test team :(
 
Hash said:
We all know about Indians and their obsession with averages, stats, records etc so it's tremendous that Sehwag couldn't get his 300.

Shame this series has been so ridiculously one sided....they have had all the luck and the pitches have been atrocious......could we do a rain dance tonight?
sure and it will rain in kiwiland :)))
 
Ayyub said:
i thought we will be No-1 test team :(
Certainly not. Australia is at the 4th spot. Even if you white wash South Africa (who are the #1 currently), you'll still take a lot of time to reach #1.
 
Ayyub said:
i thought we will be No-1 test team :(
no aussies will also rise after walloping wi and i dont think pak has it in them to trouble aus

batting line up that boasts of

twatson
katich
ponting
hussey
clarke
north
haddin
mj

thats huge for any side to overcome
 
pun500 said:
no aussies will also rise after walloping wi and i dont think pak has it in them to trouble aus

batting line up that boasts of

twatson
katich
ponting
hussey
clarke
north
haddin
mj

thats huge for any side to overcome
Even teams like S.A and India with their batting line ups will find it difficult to defeat Australia with the team they have prepared lately. The bad phase of Australia was a result of their rebuilding phase, and now it's more or less over. Mark my words, they'll soon be taking over the throne (although I don't want that to happen :D )
 
pun500 said:
no aussies will also rise after walloping wi and i dont think pak has it in them to trouble aus

batting line up that boasts of

twatson
katich
ponting
hussey
clarke
north
haddin
mj

thats huge for any side to overcome


we also have good bowling line up Aamir , Asif , Gul , Danny , Ajmal , Rauf , and last but not the least sohail khan .
 
Ayyub said:
i thought we will be No-1 test team :(
35b5zdx.jpg
..carry on.
 
Ayyub said:
we also have good bowling line up Aamir , Asif , Gul , Danny , Ajmal , Rauf , and last but not the least sohail khan .
aamer bowls well but doesnt pick wickets that fast ... asif is the only star you have . rest are decent

IMHO your best chance was 1999 (wasim waqar saqlain shoaib inzi yousuf i dnt knw maybe younis was there as well)

part-2 your batting

looks like younis wont be playing

so you have yousuf and untested u akmal (who in a worrying trend is playing tests like odis and t20s and slogging far too often)

k akmal is hit and miss and the rest are so poor that probably ponting will outscore them all

aussie bowling with bollinger , hilfy , hauritz, siddle ,mj is also decent..yes they dont have a gun like asif but man to man their bowling is almost 80% of pak

of course their fielding is lightyears better
 
Hash said:
We all know about Indians and their obsession with averages, stats, records etc so it's tremendous that Sehwag couldn't get his 300.

Yeah just the same way how you dont want your Saeed Anwars ODI record being broken the Jinkz thread is growing faster than Afridi's usual stay at the crease. ;-)


Shame this series has been so ridiculously one sided....they have had all the luck and the pitches have been atrocious......could we do a rain dance tonight?

Huh ? with all due respects we are setting up for a 2-0 defeat against the Lankans which seems to be a more result oriented series than the last time Lankans were at Pakistan ?.. Oh yeah about that little 'one sided' note its not our fault Lankans cant take on our team at our house....First time I have seen someone blame a team for kicking the crap out of another side, poor Sri Lankans damn the Indians for kicking their butt lol


Ans in bold
 
Last edited:
Ayyub said:
we also have good bowling line up Aamir , Asif , Gul , Danny , Ajmal , Rauf , and last but not the least sohail khan .

I think Pak can pull of an upset against OZ provided the crusade wont be there to bail Oz out...
 
pun500 said:
aamer bowls well but doesnt pick wickets that fast ... asif is the only star you have . rest are decent

IMHO your best chance was 1999 (wasim waqar saqlain shoaib inzi yousuf i dnt knw maybe younis was there as well)

part-2 your batting

looks like younis wont be playing

so you have yousuf and untested u akmal (who in a worrying trend is playing tests like odis and t20s and slogging far too often)

k akmal is hit and miss and the rest are so poor that probably ponting will outscore them all

aussie bowling with bollinger , hilfy , hauritz, siddle ,mj is also decent..yes they dont have a gun like asif but man to man their bowling is almost 80% of pak

of course their fielding is lightyears better

this is will be exciting and awesome series if pakistan take it seriously .

mind u whenever pakistan play it is exciting to watch.

both teams are equally balanced ...Australia is doing rebuilding process and pakistan have few weakness in batting only.


let see what team is announced on dec 7 for test series i m so excited and just like my indian friends are for india vs south africa :D
 
Romali_rotti said:
I think Pak can pull of an upset against OZ provided the crusade wont be there to bail Oz out...
in wonderland ... not in reality

odis you could say maybe but 5 days no and that to over 3 tests hell no

when teams like nz skittle your batting in decent batting conditions you know you are in trouble.

aussies are more balanced than most sides in the world barring maybe saf

their batting is among the top 3 (ind saf aus) and their bowling is also among top 3 ( saf pak aus)

their mental strength is unparalled
 
pun500 said:
in wonderland ... not in reality

odis you could say maybe but 5 days no and that to over 3 tests hell no

when teams like nz skittle your batting in decent batting conditions you know you are in trouble.

aussies are more balanced than most sides in the world barring maybe saf

their batting is among the top 3 (ind saf aus) and their bowling is also among top 3 ( saf pak aus)

their mental strength is unparalled

*** we can beat them in test match i hope ur opinion will change after 1st test

ameen
 
Romali_rotti said:
I think Pak can pull of an upset against OZ provided the crusade wont be there to bail Oz out...
Unless we miraculously find a competent batsman at the top it'll remain a dream.
 
I said:
Pak vs Aus= Aus winning by an innings in each match.
I don't want to rub it to Pak fans, but unless their bowling attack completely destroys Australia's batting line up, what you say seems to be the likely result. I'm going by the way Pak has batted for the last year. However things can be different if their batsmen raise their game and perform better.
 
Bublu Bhuyan said:
I don't want to rub it to Pak fans, but unless their bowling attack completely destroys Australia's batting line up, what you say seems to be the likely result. I'm going by the way Pak has batted for the last year. However things can be different if their batsmen raise their game and perform better.


The bowling can deliver and rescue us only so many times.
The batting has to perform, not only perform but deliver 100+ runs for the 1st wicket in 3/6 total innings of a 3 test match series otherwise the rest will disintegrate especially without Younus.

I think they will and we will win 1-0 or draw 1-1.
 
Check this gem from Shastri
"Ravi Shastri. "It's a superb pitch, good for batting and also has something for the bowlers. Excellent Test pitch.""

LOL@ something for the bowlers.
 
USaqaf said:
Check this gem from Shastri
"Ravi Shastri. "It's a superb pitch, good for batting and also has something for the bowlers. Excellent Test pitch.""

LOL@ something for the bowlers.

Def had something for bowlers when we were bowling..
 
Romali_rotti said:
Def had something for bowlers when we were bowling..

Thats why SL effortlessly scored 393.
Wellington that was a real test match and a real test pitch.
 
USaqaf said:
Thats why SL effortlessly scored 393.
Wellington that was a real test match and a real test pitch.


393 makes it a bad wicket huh ? Wow Sri Lanka only got to face around 100 odd overs for that,,, HMMMMMMM they should have only scored 200.. Come to think of it WI making 450 plus effortlessly in the current test against Oz must not be a real test match either....
 
Romali_rotti said:
393 makes it a bad wicket huh ? Wow Sri Lanka only got to face around 100 odd overs for that,,, HMMMMMMM they should have only scored 200.. Come to think of it WI making 450 plus effortlessly in the current test against Oz must not be a real test match either....

At least WI is playing on a true test match pitch and making a match of it unlike ...
 
USaqaf said:
At least WI is playing on a true test match pitch and making a match of it unlike ...


Do you have any idea how stupid you sound ? WI making 450 is good because its a 'true' test pitch. But Sri Lanka scoring 57 runs less makes it an untrue test pitch :))) :))) :))) ...... Can another Pak fan with a bit of brain please explain to me what the difference here is ? The test match just concluded lasted 5 days and produced a result but apparently its not a 'true' test pitch...
 
Romali_rotti said:
Do you have any idea how stupid you sound ? WI making 450 is good because its a 'true' test pitch. But Sri Lanka scoring 57 runs less makes it an untrue test pitch :))) :))) :))) ...... Can another Pak fan with a bit of brain please explain to me what the difference here is ? The test match just concluded lasted 5 days and produced a result but apparently its not a 'true' test pitch...

Ahh there it comes out, the true Indian behaviour.
 
We are the top DAWGSSSSSSSSS :D....................... Dhoni best captian since Imran out of the sub continent.....Congrats to him, the team and all the fans...
 
USaqaf said:
Ahh there it comes out, the true Indian behaviour.

Yep I am just glad it wasnt 'untrue' like the apparent wicket which was used that lasted 5 days and produced a result...
 
Bublu Bhuyan said:
Just baseless silly rumor, nothing else.

Unfortunately it may not be just a rumour.

They also have a combined age of 107 and, with few countries actually adhering to the Future Tours Programme, there might be no home Tests before the World Cup in 2011. Next year's series against South Africa will feature only ODIs and it's hard to see much enthusiasm on the part of the BCCI for a tour by New Zealand just three months before the first ball is bowled at the World Cup.

http://www.cricinfo.com/indvsl2009/content/story/438123.html
 
Infact its our bad luck!

Currently Saffies are playing crap cricket against Eng and would be perfectly fine for us to play test cricket against them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top