Where are the selection critics now? What difference did the inclusion of Rahul and Rahane make? Rahul looked absolutely clueless. He couldn’t even touch the inswinging deliveries. Rahane was no different. These two NEVER deserved a place in the XI for the first test. Let’s see if they can make an impact in the 2nd innings. Anyways, I just hope the ‘selection based on potential’ theory won’t surface here anytime soon

.
India is losing simply because they aren’t batting well enough. It’s not a selection issue; rather an issue with application. The Indian batting lineup was expected to perform well under these difficult conditions. Barring Kohli, no other batsmen performed. How can you run away from that fact? Maybe it’s more convenient to put the entire blame on Shastri and Kohli to defend India’s no.1 ranking in Tests. The Indian team with its batting lineup in current form (and approach) isn’t the best Test team out there. Potential wise yes, it’s the best batting lineup in the world by some distance and among the top test teams. But what is potential without performance?
The bowlers kept India in the game throughout the series but the batsmen just couldn't support them. It's a fact we should accept and look to change in the upcoming tours.