What's new

"It's blatant cheating," says Andy Bichel about Joe Root's catch of Marnus Labuschagne

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
218,056
A former Australian test bowler has labelled Joe Root a cheat for claiming a controversial catch in the second Ashes test at Lords.

Andy Bichel, who took 58 wickets from 19 tests, described Root's actions as 'blatant cheating' following the England captain claiming a contentious catch in the second test.

Root claimed the catch of substitute Australian batsman Marnus Labuschagne - who was brought into the test as international crickets first-ever concussion substitute for the felled Steve Smith - on day five of the test despite the ball appearing to touch the ground before going into his clutching fingers.

The catch was cleared by the third umpire but debate continued to rage long after the match ground to a draw.

Speaking on Macquarie Sports Radio on Wednesday, Bichel said Root would have known the ball didn't carry cleanly into his hands.

"It didn't carry – you can see that," Bichel said.

"It's ricocheted off the player as well, so it's bobbled a little bit to him. He knows he's picked it up on the half-volley. It's blatant cheating.

"To stand there and then all of a sudden give Marnus a bit of a send-off as well – 'Mate, you're out, get off here' – when Marnus has seen the footage of it on the TV as well, that he's not out and he shouldn't be out. It was a real bizarre one from Joe, a man of that experience playing it out like it did," Bichel told Macquarie Sports Radio.

Bichel, now the assistant coach of Queensland, has accused Root of not playing within the spirit of the game because he has not been scoring runs and England was already down 1-0 in the five-game series.

"You'd like to think that there was a real gentleman's approach to that; just say, 'Mate, I didn't catch that', and you don't even go upstairs for it. It just didn't happen," Bichel told Macquarie Sports Radio.

"A little low point for a man under pressure in Joe Root. He just hasn't got any runs and now it's just mounting on him day by day."

Speaking before Bichel's claims of 'blatant cheating', Root stood by his decision to claim the catch.

"As a fielder, you know if your fingers are under the ball; I clearly felt that was the case," Root said afterwards. "I'm an honest guy, I am not going to try and cheat the game regardless of the situation," Root told reporters.

The contentious catch is likely to continue as a hot topic in the lead up to the third test at Headingley that begins on Thursday night (NZT).

https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/crick...t-bowler-accuses-joe-root-of-blatant-cheating
 
Don't think root would have known. Can't blame him, the job was of third umpire to decide and benefit of doubt should go to batsman.

Watching it on TV, I also believed it wasn't out. Was surprised when third umpire gave him out.

Either way, root should not be blamed, don't think he would have known if it bumped or not.
 
It's certainly the wrong decision but I wouldn't blame root. Those ones are too close to call without the replays.
 
It wasn't cheating, those are the kinda catches the fielder thinks he/she has caught clean. But I do think it hit the ground before going into Root's hand.

I realise the other angle seemed to show it may have been caught with his fingers underneath [still looked like it bounced to me though], but the front-on view showed it bounced and his fingers weren't underneath the ball.
 
Don't think root would have known. Can't blame him, the job was of third umpire to decide and benefit of doubt should go to batsman.

Watching it on TV, I also believed it wasn't out. Was surprised when third umpire gave him out.

Either way, root should not be blamed, don't think he would have known if it bumped or not.

Think the third umpire gave it out because Aleem Dar gave an out signal after it went to the third umpire. So there wasn't enough proof for the third umpire to change the decision.
 
Problem with this is that things happen in the heat of the moment. When stakes are so high, even the best falter.
 
Did Root claim the catch? He should've sent it to third umpire. There's no way he didn't know he didn't catch the ball cleanly.
 
It was pretty clear that it was NOT OUT.

Umpires get the sacred-cow treatment in the cricketing community.
 
No one plays mind games better than Aussies. They know Root is struggling so why not get him thinking a bit more and pile on the pressure.
 
No one plays mind games better than Aussies. They know Root is struggling so why not get him thinking a bit more and pile on the pressure.

Pretty sure they’re still trying to go with the “elite honesty” method to try and get some of the dirt from the ball-tampering off their backside.
 
Aussies should be the last ones accusing anyone of cheating especially considering their team is filled with disgraceful cry baby cheats
 
lol Bichel can do one. What does this have to do with him?

You would have thought after Sandpapergate that the Aussies would now be keeping shtum on these matters - alas.

Never has there been a team which places such a high price on the Spirit of Cricket when it negatively affects them, yet will gladly do whatever it takes to win in any situation.

As much as they claim to have changed, and entered this brave new era of sportsmanship, I’m not buying it.
 
Back
Top