Strike Rate
Senior T20I Player
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2013
- Runs
- 19,788
1365 posts? i bet 1300 of them came on his failures and 65 when he performed 

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Where did you mention me [MENTION=131701]Mamoon[/MENTION]? That post seems to be deleted.
That guy Junaids was accusing Misbah of deliberating underperforming to make Pakistan lose and Mamoon seemed very gleeful after reading that post and wanted yours and mine opinion on the matter.
1365 posts? i bet 1300 of them came on his failures and 65 when he performed![]()
His biggest fans are Mamoon and Bilal7, hold the no.1 and no.2 positions for most posts in this thread![]()
haha how many posts by them?
181 for Mamoon and 137 by Bilal 7 who got quiet a bit of catching up to do![]()
He has shown lack of temperament and throws his wicket often, that's why he cannot be considered a Test class batsman.
That hundred vs. Sri Lanka more than a year ago remains his only great Test innings to date, where he fought it out and occupied the crease for a long period of time.
He might open in the UAE but that's a stop gap solution, since England would need a second spinner there. Will be back in the lower-order afterwards.
He is a Limited Overs specialist who is being forced to play Test cricket thanks to England's inability to find a worthy successor of Swann and he happens to bat and bowl better than any other spinner at this point.
It's like Shoaib Malik getting picked in Tests if we don't have any Test quality spinner and the others bowl and bat worse than him.
Not saying Malik is better than Moeen, the latter is way better with the ball and probably better with the bat as well, but my point is that a Limited Overs specialist being made to play Test cricket because of the lack of options and alternatives does not make him a Test standard cricketer.
In isolation, neither his bowling or batting is good enough for Test level, but as a package, he has enough value for England given their pool of spinners.
I don't see why it is offensive to say so, and nor does that mean that he cannot develop into a class Test player, but that's based on what he has exhibited so far.
I wouldn't call Mamoon a fan, which is the real problem with him holding the #1 spot for this thread.
I wouldn't call Mamoon a fan, which is the real problem with him holding the #1 spot for this thread.
He dislikes both Amla and Moeen because they have beards and has a blast everytime they fail.
So, in your opinion, players that bat with flair and bat aggressively are not "test-class batsmen"? I would like to know if that is only the case for Ali or if Stokes, who has given his wicket away far more frequently and has yet to play a single gritty innings, is also not considered a "test-class batsman"?
What about the likes of Warner, Sehwag, KP and Viv? None of them are renowned for facing 200+ deliveries for their centuries. Attacking players do give their wicket away at times, it is part of the package. Batsmen who score runs at the test level are test-class batsmen, it doesn't matter whether they score those runs at a SR of 40 or 70.
It's not offensive at all, silly choice of words. It is incorrect however, because he has shown everyone that his batting is more than ready for a long stay at the test level. Go listen to what the experts are saying about him and don't hesitate to quote me when you find a couple that agree with your view about Ali not being a test-class batsman.
Where did you mention me [MENTION=131701]Mamoon[/MENTION]? That post seems to be deleted.
That guy Junaids was accusing Misbah of deliberating underperforming to make Pakistan lose and Mamoon seemed very gleeful after reading that post and wanted yours and mine opinion on the matter.
Players like Sehwag, Pietersen and Viv Richards found great success with their own playing style and are regarded as once in a generation batsmen. Why are you comparing Moeen to them? just because he's attacking?
Well if he averages 50 and scores 20+ hundreds regardless of his playing style, then you can consider him a Test class batsman, but not when he throws it away after 30s and 40s with a paltry average of 31.
He is not rated for his batting individually, but for his all-round value. Do you think he will get into the England Test team without his bowling? No chance.
Ben Stokes is not a finished article yet and like Moeen, he has to improve on his consistency. They have been pretty identical with the bat so far but Stokes has a hundred in Australia and another game-changing hundred vs. New Zealand, but he also needs to improve his consistency and play longer innings if he is to be considered as a genuine Test quality batter like Botham rather than the second coming of Flintoff.
Batting at #8 or #9 with the tail makes it hard not to throw it away, because you can't really build an innings with Finn for company. When guys like Botham, Nasser, Atherton and Gilchrist praise Moeen's batting, they are rating his batting individually. Who knows if he would have gotten into the English set-up without his bowling? Maybe he might have had another couple of centuries if he was a pure batsman but that is speculation.
Both Stokes and Ali are test match batsmen. They might not be consistent but both have shown enough evidence of their class. Someone like Adam Lyth, who has failed miserably in test matches can have his aptitude for tests, questioned. Not a couple of guys who have scored three superb centuries between them, along with half a dozen fifties, that contributed heavily to their team's victory.
If I'm not wrong, didn't he start as a number 6 and got demoted to 8/9 because he kept throwing his wicket away?
Well in my view, both Moeen and Stokes need to improve their consistency to be considered Test class batsman.
Between the two, I think Stokes has the greater all-round potential and can be a genuine match-winner but he has a long way to go with both bat and ball.
Moeen being a spinner, will not win England many games but let's see how he bowls in the UAE, India, Sri Lanka etc., particularly in the second innings.
It's a bit stupid in having him bat at number 8. He looks good enough to be a genuine batting allrounder who should cement his spot at number 6 in Tests
Like [MENTION=131701]Mamoon[/MENTION] said, he threw his wicket away too much and got demoted.
Well he has been batting a lot better in recent times so I don't think a promotion up the batting order would hurt anyone.
So, in your opinion, players that bat with flair and bat aggressively are not "test-class batsmen"? I would like to know if that is only the case for Ali or if Stokes, who has given his wicket away far more frequently and has yet to play a single gritty innings, is also not considered a "test-class batsman"?
What about the likes of Warner, Sehwag, KP and Viv? None of them are renowned for facing 200+ deliveries for their centuries. Attacking players do give their wicket away at times, it is part of the package. Batsmen who score runs at the test level are test-class batsmen, it doesn't matter whether they score those runs at a SR of 40 or 70.
It's not offensive at all, silly choice of words. It is incorrect however, because he has shown everyone that his batting is more than ready for a long stay at the test level. Go listen to what the experts are saying about him and don't hesitate to quote me when you find a couple that agree with your view about Ali not being a test-class batsman.
Perhaps his average will not be disturbed after all. Congratulations in advance to all English and Pakistani PPers.
You forgot to add that Pakistan should also win the series.
Well that's a given.
Perhaps his average will not be disturbed after all. Congratulations in advance to all English and Pakistani PPers.
Nothing is certain in life but debt and taxes.
England will win the series with match winning contributions from Moeen and Adil and prove once and for all that an undemocratic and unmeritocratic Pakistan establishment is on its way down and out unless it changes its ways
Well, he averages 35-odd with the ball so there is nothing here that warrants congratulations being dealt out.
Well, he averages 35-odd with the ball so there is nothing here that warrants congratulations being dealt out.
Actually I do see him getting slaughtered against YK and Sarfraz, he could be averaging in the 3 figures for this series, it won't be pretty that's for sure.
Rashid is the danger-man, pak batters generally play offies pretty well. Good job that Yasir probably gives the pak line up a decent leg-spin work out in the nets.
Yeah agreed I'm scared that he might knock out one of our batsmen with a beamer.
How is that possible? I've not seen Rashid knock out anyone with a beamer before or any spinner for that matter; also it's not amusing making injury related jokes. Rashid takes wickets bowling leg spin beautifully and that is what he will try to do.
He has never bowled on such wickets before. 3-for on a day 1 pitch is not a very good sign.
Actually I do see him getting slaughtered against YK and Sarfraz, he could be averaging in the 3 figures for this series, it won't be pretty that's for sure.
If England can open with Ali, why can't we open with Malik? We really only 'need' his off-spin, so a scratchy 30 is all that is expected from his willow.
For who?
Joking, don't go into a depression again. I am concerned though, England could have easily scored 400+ against Pakistan 'A' if they were allowed to bat for longer. Their bowling wasn't impressive but even a draw is as bad as a loss for us, in the UAE.
Younis will probably just milk him. It's going to be Sarfaraz and Misbah who'll go after him. Perhaps Shehzad too, if all the planets are aligned and he not only gets to play, but also survives the English pacers.
Rashid is going to be more expensive since he gives more bad balls per over (and more good ones as well).
Don't we have regular openers?
If England can open with Ali, why can't we open with Malik? We really only 'need' his off-spin, so a scratchy 30 is all that is expected from his willow.
If the management feels that Malik's bowling is needed, then they should just open with him, instead of disrupting the entire middle-order in order to accommodate him at #6. Pretty much what England are doing with Ali, so that Rashid can play and the rest of the lineup isn't disturbed.
I don't think YK & Misbah's positions should be altered but Azhar can be pushed to open while Shafiq can move up to 3, with Malik coming in at 6.
Actually I do see him getting slaughtered against YK and Sarfraz, he could be averaging in the 3 figures for this series, it won't be pretty that's for sure.
Nightmare start to the tour for Pakistan's favorite English cricketer. Will he redeem himself in the latter part of this Test and the remaining two matches or break the hearts of millions of Pakistanis?
Stay tuned . . .
Overall an awful match for him.
Good for us now need to get Stokes out and England will be looking for draw from there.