Rana
Hall of Famer
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2006
- Runs
- 90,951
No.He looked actually lost whenever he was at the crease in ODIs
Just No.
Stop this nonsense.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No.He looked actually lost whenever he was at the crease in ODIs
Younis Khan averaged 50+ with a strike rate of 140 (almost identical to Shahid Afridi) in Pakistan's 2009 WT20 winning campaign. His captaincy was exceptional.
He has produced multiple standout ODI knocks that eclipse Babar’s finest effort, his 2019 World Cup century against New Zealand.
Stop talking out of your backside.
No.
Just No.
Stop this
He was not a “terrible” ODI player. You don’t have a clue what you are talking about. Let it go. Even with an average of 31 during the era he played in, he is a superior batsman to Rizwan and Misbah in One Day cricket. His skills were far superior to both.Younis Khan was a terrible ODI player.
Can't believe this argument is taking place lol
*im going to have to break character here for a bit
@topspin bro, you need not waste time with these covid/Misbah’s najaiz cricket fans when discussing the standards of cricket during the eras. Younis Khan in Test cricket has played some of the unreal innings that guys like Babar+Rizwan will never play even as a combined entity.
Some of his ODI innings were elite too. When he was on, the guy was an absolute delight to watch. I firmly believe he was on course to become Pakistan’s solid number 3 who set the pace and tempo of the innings around the 2007-8 time (maybe even before it). I remember back then I was in total awe of players like Ponting because they were setting the tempo for their side by bossing it at 3. Punter always batted at a strike rate close to a hundred. He never really celebrated a 50, it wasn’t job done for him. He had that attitude. I wanted a player like that for Pakistan and for brief moments I thought YK was easing into this role.
Pakistan have had too many years of turbulence, politics and infighting as soon as Inzimam stepped away and then you had a slow crawl in of players like Misbah, whilst a drama queen like Hafeez was getting louder and louder with his stuck up attitude! Shoaib Malik as usual doing his “cloak and dagger” politics whilst falling out with everyone. Yousuf continuously living in a delusion of royalty within his head and Shahid Afridi with his menopause tantrums that he would randomly throw here and there.
All of these chawwals (although good cricketers) were kept in line during the Inzimam+Woolmer era! They were all let loose like a bunch of wild, toxic pendus and it basically ruined what could have been a great era for Pakistan cricket because the players were still top quality as they had fine batsmen and top class fast bowlers.
YK the proper no.3 ODI batter was lost in this period.
Relevance of the bolded?
One century in world cup is the entirety of your stand out YK knocks?
Think you need to take your advice as per the last sentence.
He was not a “terrible” ODI player. You don’t have a clue what you are talking about. Let it go. Even with an average of 31 during the era he played in, he is a superior batsman to Rizwan and Misbah in One Day cricket. His skills were far superior to both.
acha so we are talking about averages here? Have you bothered checking YK’s stats in white ball vs Babar’s stats in white ball?10k runs at over 50 average. What else do you want?
If you’d read my post I’ve already addressed the babar average. If you can’t read properly or pretend you can’t, don’t waste my time.acha so we are talking about averages here? Have you bothered checking YK’s stats in white ball vs Babar’s stats in white ball?
YK was such a bad white ball player then he would struggle to get into Pakistan’s B team today.
I suggest you focus on discussion rather than using <<<>>><<<>>><<<>>vs>>>>>>vs<<>>>.@Rana
This reminds me of when Major claimed "Misbah > Inzy in ODIs" purely on the basis of a higher average, forcing Mamoon to open a thread just to correct him.
Major continued to insist that Misbah was superior to Inzy, only to be shut down by the OP, who highlighted that he wasn’t just behind Inzy and MoYo, but also Younis Khan. The breakdown exposed how averages and strike rates vary across eras.
Like Major, these simpletons are detached from reality, either because they didn’t watch enough cricket in the 2000s, never understood that era, or are simply agenda-driven posters. My question to you is, which do you think it is?
I suggest you focus on discussion rather than using <<<>>><<<>>><<<>>vs>>>>>>vs<<>>>.
THREAD IS NOT ABOUT YOUNIS KHAN...
NO MORE SUCH POSTS NOW
But both are all format batters.Ones a keeper the other is a batting allrounder, appleswith
, but some loose head are hell bent on the comparison