Executioner
Test Debutant
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2012
- Runs
- 15,032
- Post of the Week
- 1
Does'nt look like 21. He looks like 23 or more.
Eh? He looks younger than Rashid Khan
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Does'nt look like 21. He looks like 23 or more.
absolutely wrong information. He never bowled even a 140k ball. his effort balls were around 130 and average pace in the 120s.
Pretty embarassing how you had to come up with lies to boast a Bengali player
Does'nt look like 21. He looks like 23 or more.
check this video from 1.50min below you see your own eyes written his fastest 141.6 and average 132.6, I've seen him bowling 144 k, but don't remember now which match it was
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/8CsnXVpAits" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Opposite - he doesn't even look like 21, but I do believe he is around 22-23 now. Came to know about the kid in 2013-14 & someone told me that he is genuine 18, which is about 4.5 years back.
He is struggling in the CT because there is zero purchase for the pace bowlers, atleast in the matches he has played in.
Played 2 complete matches, was ordinary against England, did Ok against NZ. However, he did beat the edge so many times its frustrating he didn't get many wickets.
He hasn't been as penetrative because he has been inconsistent with his line and length. When he bowls good lines he is a tough bowler to face. Also, since injury he has struggled a bit with pace but gradually will improve.
You forgot about the jadu tona that was done on malcolm fizz by baba bawaali.
Only if i could get a dollar for every excuse you made in your post.
Even though fizz has lost his initial mojo he's still the second best fast bowler in limited overs cricket after M. STARC.
Bcb must kick out useless Walsh if they wanna get back the old Mustafizur. Walsh is absolutely useless. Bangla need H. Streak again as the bowling coach again.
Bangla can also approach kumble for the position of head coach. His headmaster type attitude might be really beneficial for the bangla team.
Extremely overrated bowler.
He isn't the same bowler as we all initially thought him to be. His secret code has already been cracked by most of the batsmen. He'll never be as threatening as he was during on the past.
Even though fizz has lost his initial mojo he's still the second best fast bowler in limited overs cricket after M. STARC.
Even though fizz has lost his initial mojo he's still the second best fast bowler in limited overs cricket after M. STARC.
Bcb must kick out useless Walsh if they wanna get back the old Mustafizur. Walsh is absolutely useless. Bangla need H. Streak again as the bowling coach again.
Bangla can also approach kumble for the position of head coach. His headmaster type attitude might be really beneficial for the bangla team.
Do you even understand quality level of Starc, a world cup winner pedigree fast bowler.
Fizz bowls off cutters as a stock delivery. This is not a fast bowler.
Extremely overrated bowler.
He isn't the same bowler as we all initially thought him to be. His secret code has already been cracked by most of the batsmen. He'll never be as threatening as he was during on the past.
Even though fizz has lost his initial mojo he's still the second best fast bowler in limited overs cricket after M. STARC.
Bcb must kick out useless Walsh if they wanna get back the old Mustafizur. Walsh is absolutely useless. Bangla need H. Streak again as the bowling coach again.
Bangla can also approach kumble for the position of head coach. His headmaster type attitude might be really beneficial for the bangla team.
why are people bumping Mustafizur threads has he just been hammered or something.
He was thrashed vs Australia quite badly. Still not got his form back from before the surgery![]()
[MENTION=136334]Shutdown Corner[/MENTION] checked his stats in that series. not that bad. Barely bowled in the first test due to spin domination.
match figures of 0/21 after bowling 9 overs.
second test he took 5/100. overall thats not the worst figures u could get.
Very disappointing on supportive pitches of South Africa.
Dying a slow death at the hands of Elgar and Amla, at the moment.
It's a flat road. What game are you watching?
Badly missing him in the x1. Always injured and losing ground to lesser talents.
He's out of BPL too it seems.
Rarely not injured.
Lol what? He’s been nothing short of mediocre this PSL.Has been brilliant in PSL but he needs to back his yorker more at the death
Lol what? He’s been nothing short of mediocre this PSL.
Absolute trash bowler, and to think some were suggesting he’s an ATG in the making)
Sorry but he is as mediocre as they come. Decent bowlers would defend 16 runs on this pitch 9 times out of 10. He was daft enough to bowl a length ball to Russel on the last ball. Rubbish.No need to make fun of him. He's already ATG for Bangladeshi team in all formats. Might not be an ATG by general cricket standards but definitely he is one for Bangladesh.
Sorry but he is as mediocre as they come. Decent bowlers would defend 16 runs on this pitch 9 times out of 10. He was daft enough to bowl a length ball to Russel on the last ball. Rubbish.
Bangladesh shouldn't lower their standards so much as to have this guy as their ATG.
I don't want to brag it, but you are taking cheap digs at the guy because of poor fielding. This exactly what I read in game thread and please try to respond this in civilized manner -
I don't understand why people are cursing Mustafiz here. It's not to back him, but here I read PSL's fielding as a determining factor for the "standard" of the cricket - then in Super over, a catch is converted to SIX, then Russel was brought to strike with a basic fielding error by WK!!!!
Not sure, how to determine standard of cricket from close game, but for such high standard, 1st 4 balls, scorecard should have read like -
1 W Dot Dot......... which would have required 2 SIX & a FOUR in last 2 balls.
Obviously, we can talk about 90% catch success (probably 89% now, for that SIX....)
Read more at http://www.pakpassion.net/ppforum/s...nother-LQ-collapse/page16#pp8bGeTo1PoYUZBi.99
Just look at mirror and think that 90% catch success it boasted as PSL's standard, after this.
I'm not taking cheap digs, I'm telling it how it is. Also I have stated in the post why I believe he is a rubbish bowler. Misfields happen, but you don't end up bowling a length ball to one of the fiercest strikers of the cricket ball when there are 3 runs to get off 1 ball.I don't want to brag it, but you are taking cheap digs at the guy because of poor fielding. This exactly what I read in game thread and please try to respond this in civilized manner -
I don't understand why people are cursing Mustafiz here. It's not to back him, but here I read PSL's fielding as a determining factor for the "standard" of the cricket - then in Super over, a catch is converted to SIX, then Russel was brought to strike with a basic fielding error by WK!!!!
Not sure, how to determine standard of cricket from close game, but for such high standard, 1st 4 balls, scorecard should have read like -
1 W Dot Dot......... which would have required 2 SIX & a FOUR in last 2 balls.
Obviously, we can talk about 90% catch success (probably 89% now, for that SIX....)
Read more at http://www.pakpassion.net/ppforum/s...nother-LQ-collapse/page16#pp8bGeTo1PoYUZBi.99
Just look at mirror and think that 90% catch success it boasted as PSL's standard, after this.
This is what happened in the actual game
View attachment 79574
Just because you are delusional doesn't mean we are too
I'm not taking cheap digs, I'm telling it how it is. Also I have stated in the post why I believe he is a rubbish bowler. Misfields happen, but you don't end up bowling a length ball to one of the fiercest strikers of the cricket ball when there are 3 runs to get off 1 ball.
He got smacked for a six off the second ball by Asif Ali FGS.
I know, that's why first point was that Buzz shouldn't have given him the ball for Super Over. Still he gave it to him because Kid has gone for less than 6 in other 3 games.
Would have won the game to day as well, unless PSL's super quality fielding choked when it mattered. I always respect you as the best entertainer of PP, never delusional.
You must be sleeping during that SIX, FGS.
I know, that's why first point was that Buzz shouldn't have given him the ball for Super Over. Still he gave it to him because Kid has gone for less than 6 in other 3 games.
Would have won the game to day as well, unless PSL's super quality fielding choked when it mattered. I always respect you as the best entertainer of PP, never delusional.
I guess that should have been a catch according to you? The entire Bangladesh team cannot hold a candle to McCullum as a fielder.You must be sleeping during that SIX, FGS.
He failed to land a single yorker in that final over .
He is an international signing . It was a very poor over whichever way you look at it .
He was visibly under too much stress and Narine should have bowled.
I guess that should have been a catch according to you? The entire Bangladesh team cannot hold a candle to McCullum as a fielder.
Stop clutching at straws and stop wasting my time by coming up with rubbish posts.
I guess that should have been a catch according to you? The entire Bangladesh team cannot hold a candle to McCullum as a fielder.
Stop clutching at straws and stop wasting my time by coming up with rubbish posts.
Would have been a better catch than Afridi's if he had taken that. He couldn't have had the balance to take it himself, the best he could have done was parry it to Akmal.McCullum himself said he should have taken that.
However, that's more to do with how hopeless Asif Ali was. Fizz was just mainly bowling length balls.
He used to bowl yorkers once upon a time but I haven't seen them recently.
McCullum himself said he should have taken that.
However, that's more to do with how hopeless Asif Ali was. Fizz was just mainly bowling length balls.
He used to bowl yorkers once upon a time but I haven't seen them recently.
Would have been a better catch than Afridi's if he had taken that. He couldn't have had the balance to take it himself, the best he could have done was parry it to Akmal.
McCullum sets high standards so I'm not surprised he said that.
Give it a rest. It wasn't a drop. McCullum couldn't have had the balance to take that catch himself. The ball was always going away from him.Thanks, "tongue in check job" accepted.
It was not according to me after all that, that it should have been a catch. Now, you can stop wasting your time clutching rubbish.
He failed to land a single yorker in that final over .
He is an international signing . It was a very poor over whichever way you look at it .
He was visibly under too much stress and Narine should have bowled.