It is an excuse because it is implying that purely on cricketing merit New Zealand aren’t better than India but are winning because India is unprepared and undercooked. That is not true.
Besides the point doesn’t stand anyway. India have been in New Zealand for over a month and in the modern game they have among the most preparedness as you generally have for a foreign tour test series.
It is implying nothing.
That's just projection.
India can be in NZ for 1 year playing random LOI and it would still mean nothing.
Back in 2014-15, India were in Aus for months yet lost every ODI game post the test series.
---
As for preparation, I have explained this over & over & over again.
Preparation is NOT about just batting 2-4 innings in a warm up game.
It's about everything
1. Taking a series seriously.
2. Identifying the issues plaguing the team (in our case seam & swing)
3. Making sure we atleast put in the efforts (atleast in practice sessions) to get it sorted
4. Showing intensity in the field (its a reflection of how seriously you are taking things)
If you look at this side and you truly believe this was a well prepared unit, I have nothing much to say.
And just because we criticize a team for not being well prepared doesn't mean the opposition's win is undermined.
When India thrashes other teams at home, the complains reg the other team start pouring out. Nobody takes it as a slight against India.