What's new

New Zealand v Pakistan | 2nd Test | Hamilton | Nov 25-29, 2016 | Day 1

Raval was dropped at 1st slip by Aslam on the third ball of the innings

Amir then created a chance and got a wicket off the final ball of the first over

And then the drop off Williamson

Thanks. Hard luck Amir. I can understand the frustration
 
Mohammad Amir champion of new ball swing, he's so good Rahat should come first change for him

You are contradicting yourself as usual - Rahat can come as 1st change for 2 reasons - he is Allen Davidson, but Amir is Wasim & Sohail is Lillee - or he is our Rubel & Amir, Sohail are Shafiul, Taskin ....

Point is, there is enough movement on the wicket & there were 3 chances made - the game is like that batsmen scores runs once set. Those 2 wickets could have made it 4/5 down now - I am not saying that it's all down to drop catches, but I keep telling that PAK won't win Test outside Asia if bowlers has to take more than 25 wickets - in first 5 overs, it has gone to 22 & it's a 450 overs game ......
 
Pakistan need to get Kiwis 3 down at least at lunch , otherwise initiative is lost after toss.
 
A ball can not be bowled straighter than how Imran is bowling it right now
 
Looking at Sohail, probably Imran should have opened with Amir - Sohail doesn't bowl well against Leftis, while Kiwis are opening with 2.

Brilliant, brilliant quote: "looks like this fella is Imran Khan in name only".
 
You are contradicting yourself as usual - Rahat can come as 1st change for 2 reasons - he is Allen Davidson, but Amir is Wasim & Sohail is Lillee - or he is our Rubel & Amir, Sohail are Shafiul, Taskin ....

Point is, there is enough movement on the wicket & there were 3 chances made - the game is like that batsmen scores runs once set. Those 2 wickets could have made it 4/5 down now - I am not saying that it's all down to drop catches, but I keep telling that PAK won't win Test outside Asia if bowlers has to take more than 25 wickets - in first 5 overs, it has gone to 22 & it's a 450 overs game ......

That is the point. If you do not grab opportunities and get wickets , you will not restrict good batsmen .
 
Shail will come round the wicket after Raval has reached his 50 ......
 
With this garbage fielding and average bowling, and even average batting we aren't winning anything down under, are we really getting exposed?
 
For lubfra in the bucks league at the moment, back in bham it use to be for Harborne properly; but when I go back home after uni finishes usually play friendlies for highcroft

I just started playing for Harborne this year. Come back and we could be teammates next year

hBUbKSl.gif
 
Bowling woling hoti nahi hai leken collar aisay charha lehtay hain jaisay asal mein Imran Khan hoon
 
Kane telling Raval bilkul seedhi seedhi ahrahi hai
 
Put on Wahab, these Khans aren't doing anything anyway
 
I had lots of arguments with few posters why Wahab should play ahead of Imran in UAE - never thought it can be true on green tops ......
 
You are contradicting yourself as usual - Rahat can come as 1st change for 2 reasons - he is Allen Davidson, but Amir is Wasim & Sohail is Lillee - or he is our Rubel & Amir, Sohail are Shafiul, Taskin ....

Point is, there is enough movement on the wicket & there were 3 chances made - the game is like that batsmen scores runs once set. Those 2 wickets could have made it 4/5 down now - I am not saying that it's all down to drop catches, but I keep telling that PAK won't win Test outside Asia if bowlers has to take more than 25 wickets - in first 5 overs, it has gone to 22 & it's a 450 overs game ......

Man I feel there is no revelance to what you are saying, you come with all these random names that has no relevance to the current topic... It sounds like you add these names to make the weight of your conversation, all I see is random names that have no relevance to the current topic... tangentiality of thought
 
It's okay. Even we started well in the first hour at Christchurch. The wickets started to fall afterwards.
 
We would have been 20/4 had we been put into bat
 
The team managements logic doesn't make ANY sense


You're playing four seamers

One of them has got to be your best swing bowler ie Rahat. He is wayward but he sure does move the ball

If it's his three bowlers maybe you should have someone else for better control but with four seamers you can afford playing an eccentric bowler
 
Imran has started to find his line - just a shame that even on this green top he isn't doing anything - just bowling gun barrel straight.
 
Now on this same pitch kiwis will be running circles around our batting even in late on day two with sun shining and dried up grass, we blame our batting all the time but we aren't the world beater in bowling either any more,
 
You are contradicting yourself as usual - Rahat can come as 1st change for 2 reasons - he is Allen Davidson, but Amir is Wasim & Sohail is Lillee - or he is our Rubel & Amir, Sohail are Shafiul, Taskin ....

Point is, there is enough movement on the wicket & there were 3 chances made - the game is like that batsmen scores runs once set. Those 2 wickets could have made it 4/5 down now - I am not saying that it's all down to drop catches, but I keep telling that PAK won't win Test outside Asia if bowlers has to take more than 25 wickets - in first 5 overs, it has gone to 22 & it's a 450 overs game ......

Caught and bowled are usually difficult to get.. so I won't consider that a 'chance' 'chance' ... usually its the batsman's fault for hitting a half volley in the wrong direction

To be honest, only one was created besides the wicket
 
Last edited:
Man I feel there is no revelance to what you are saying, you come with all these random names that has no relevance to the current topic... It sounds like you add these names to make the weight of your conversation, all I see is random names that have no relevance to the current topic... tangentiality of thought

"You are contradicting yourself as usual - Rahat can come as 1st change for 2 reasons - he is Allen Davidson, but Amir is Wasim & Sohail is Lillee - or he is our Rubel & Amir, Sohail are Shafiul, Taskin ...." those 6 names looks like random for you to understand why Rahat comes as 1st change?
 
The team managements logic doesn't make ANY sense


You're playing four seamers

One of them has got to be your best swing bowler ie Rahat. He is wayward but he sure does move the ball

If it's his three bowlers maybe you should have someone else for better control but with four seamers you can afford playing an eccentric bowler

I get it, but the ratio would be 3:1 in terms of left arm to right bowlers, also it gets rid of the myth that our bench has a big star in the waiting
 
Kiwi bowlers would have been swinging it around corners on this pitch
 
I just started playing for Harborne this year. Come back and we could be teammates next year

hBUbKSl.gif

Awesome club! Is the selector Ian still there? How much mitai did it take before he promoted you :afridi I've wanted to return but held back because it's a serious club which I'd only return if 100% firing on all cylinders, I must say though the banter is on another level in the staffordshire league :)))
 
Caught and bowled are usually difficult to get.. so I won't consider that a 'chance' 'chance'

To be honest, only one was created besides the wicket

True - but what Raval is doing here is taking out the skin of the Kookabura & there is no Yasir in this match. On similar condition & bowling - these are 2 most disciplined & equipped players. At least one end could have been open.
 
"You are contradicting yourself as usual - Rahat can come as 1st change for 2 reasons - he is Allen Davidson, but Amir is Wasim & Sohail is Lillee - or he is our Rubel & Amir, Sohail are Shafiul, Taskin ...." those 6 names looks like random for you to understand why Rahat comes as 1st change?

Rahat has a natural angle which allows him to swing it more than Amir.. however its the right call for Rahat to be benched in this games.. as it is completely useless for Rahat to bowl first change after the new ball has been wasted by Amir
 
I just tuned in, and was like woah NZ are doing quite alright on a green pitch.

First thought: Someone probably dropped a catch.

and meri nazar lag gayi. Kane gone :rosco
 
Finally. If only Rahat was there in stead of Imran. Good to see Sohail finally get it right
 
I just tuned in, and was like woah NZ are doing quite alright on a green pitch.

First thought: Someone probably dropped a catch.

and meri nazar lag gayi. Kane gone :rosco

Two catches were dropped off Amir (one by himself )
 
Rahat has a natural angle which allows him to swing it more than Amir.. however its the right call for Rahat to be benched in this games.. as it is completely useless for Rahat to bowl first change after the new ball has been wasted by Amir
Go away man you're starting to get annoying.
 
But nothing showed up on hot spot..


Not that I'm complaining :amir2
 
Mr technique out twice within 13 runs :))

Kohli, Root, Smith and Rahane are the real big 4.
 
I don't know much about NZ batting, but has the tail started. notwithstanding his 290 at Perth
 
Rahat has a natural angle which allows him to swing it more than Amir.. however its the right call for Rahat to be benched in this games.. as it is completely useless for Rahat to bowl first change after the new ball has been wasted by Amir

Stop trolling - there are 2 ends.

Close this discussion here, I don't want to feed you ....... :)
 
Back
Top