What's new

No bar on Imran from contesting election: IHC chief justice

Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) chief Imran Khan on Wednesday submitted a certified copy of the Election Commission of Pakistan’s (ECP) verdict to the Islamabad High Court (IHC) after the Registrar’s Office had raised objections to his petition against the ECP’s disqualification decision.

Last week, the former premier had approached the IHC, requesting them to declare the ECP’s decision null and void. However, the Registrar’s Office had raised objections regarding Imran’s biometrics and the certification of the submitted ECP verdict.

Chief Justice Athar Minallah had emphasised that the court needed a certified copy of the judgment before issuing an injunction.

Imran presented a verified copy of the electoral watchdog’s decision today and validated his biometrics through his attorney.

He also challenged the ECP’s order to remove him as a member of the National Assembly (MNA) from the NA-95 constituency and requested that the high court declare his removal null and void.

He maintained that the ECP had disqualified him from NA-5, and de-notified him from NA-95. He furthered that he was disqualified from NA-95 on October 21, and this was rectified on October 24.

Earlier this week, the ECP de-notified Imran Khan as an MNA soon after it issued the written judgment of his disqualification.

The PTI chief's NA-95 Mianwali-I seat was declared vacant under Article 63(1)(p) read with Section 137, 167 and 173 of the Elections Act 2017, after being disqualified in the Toshakhana (gift depository) reference.

A four-member bench of the ECP had three days ago declared Imran's National Assembly seat vacant as it unanimously decided that he had misled officials about the gifts he received from foreign dignitaries during his tenure as the prime minister.

Express Tribune
 
The Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) on Wednesday said it would be left with no other option but to indict PTI Chairman Imran Khan as well as his aides Asad Umar and Fawad Chaudhry in a contempt case after November 10.

A four-member bench, headed by ECP Sindh Member Nisar Ahmed Durrani, conducted a hearing on the contempt case filed against the former premier and other leaders of his party.
Advertisement


Barrister Anwar Mansoor Khan appeared before the bench to respresent the PTI leaders.

Barrister Anwar raised questions about the legality of the notices.

He argued that they were issued by the ECP secretary instead of the commission itself.

“The [show-cause] notices are illegal until this matter is sorted out,” he added.

He further pointed out that the notices carried the signature of the director general of law.

To this, Durrani noted that the notices were that of the ECP despite its secretary issuing them.

He added that the notices were issued by the commission and its secretary had merely “conveyed” them to the respondents.

The lawyer asked the ECP to hold a hearing after October 31 as the Lahore High Court was entertaining a similar case on that date.

He added that Umar had been receiving threats since last night and there was security for him.

At this, the bench said that it would have no other choice but to issue a charge sheet against his clients after November 10.

The lawyer pointed out that the commission was not a court.

Durrani replied that the commission had never claimed to be a court.

“We are aware of our jurisdiction,” he added.

The bench later adjourned the proceedings.

In August this year, the ECP issued contempt notices to Imran, Fawad and Umar for levelling allegations at the electoral body and Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Sikander Sultan Raja.

The ECP spokesperson said in a statement that notices were issued to the PTI chief for using “insulting and unparliamentary remarks” against the electoral body in various speeches.

The commission said it issued the notices after reviewing speeches of the PTI leaders which was provided by the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Pemra) on the electoral body’s request.

The PTI chief has time and again accused the ECP and it chief of being biased and demanded CEC Raja to step down.

He also accused the ECP chief of siding with the ruling PML-N against the PTI.
 
IHC bars ECP from holding by-polls in Imran's Mianwali seat
Seat fell vacant in NA-95 post ECP disqualification verdict; PTI counsel argues decision has 'no justification'

ISLAMABAD:
The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Monday stopped the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) from holding by-polls in NA-95 in Mianwali, which fell vacant after Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan's disqualification in the Toshakhana reference.

Justice Aamer Farooq presided over a petition filed by the PTI chief against the electoral watchdog's disqualification verdict, wherein Barrister Ali Zafar appeared before the court on behalf of Imran.

During the proceedings, the PTI lawyer requested the court to suspend the decision of Imran Khan's disqualification.

However, Justice Farooq remarked that we are not suspending the decision of the ECP, adding that "we are only stopping by-elections from being held".

Advocate Zafar maintained that the ECP overstepped its authority by declaring disqualification and said that that the former premier was de-seated and disqualified as a Member of the National Assembly.

"The ECP has to give its findings on the reference sent by the Speaker," he said.

“Did this reference come from the speaker?” questioned Justice Farooq.

To which the barrister replied, “Yes, this reference was sent by the Speaker on which the disqualification was pronounced."

The counsel then told the court that "every MNA is bound to submit details of his assets by June 30. Details of all assets, including property and jewelry, have to be submitted and if something has been sold, the proceeds have to be disclosed."

"If an assembly member does not provide these details, his membership is suspended. If the member does not submit the returns within 120 days or gives false information, the member is guilty of corrupt practice," he added.

The barrister furthered that the law punishes false statements and misrepresentation with imprisonment for up to three years along with a fine but there is no penalty of disqualification.

He also said that according to the law the trial of an offense of misdeclaration should be in the sessions court which can decide on the matter. "The ECP will only play the role of a complainant in this case," he added.

“After being convicted, the ECP can then impose a sentence of disqualification up to five years," he said, adding that currently, there "is no justification" for Imran's disqualification as it would be possible only after a trial.

After hearing the arguments the court stated, “We are not suspending the decision of the ECP, we are stopping the by-election."

Subsequently, the IHC issued notices to the parties, including the ECP, and adjourned further hearing of the case till November 10.

It also stopped the release of the election schedule in Mianwali and made a copy of the certified decision of the ECP a part of the court record.

ECP’s decision

The ECP on October 21 disqualified PTI chairman and deposed premier Imran Khan under Article 63(1)(p) as it announced its verdict in the Toshakhana (gift depository) reference.

The ECP verdict sparked protests in various cities.

A four-member bench of the ECP declared Imran's National Assembly seat vacant as it unanimously decided that he had misled officials about the gifts he received from foreign dignitaries during his tenure as the prime minister.

Express Tribune
 
ECP CONTEMPT CASE: SC ISSUES NOTICES TO IMRAN KHAN, OTHER PTI LEADERS

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court of Pakistan on Tuesday issued notices to Pakistan Tehreeek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan and other party leaders on Election Commission of Pakistan’s (ECP) petitions seeking contempt proceedings, ARY News reported.

A three-member bench, headed by Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Umar Ata Bandial and comprising Justice Ayesha Malik and Justice Athar Minallah, heard the ECP’s petitions urging the apex court to lift the stay orders issued by high courts against the electoral watchdog’s contempt notices to PTI Chairman Imran Khan, Asad Umar and Fawad Chaudhry.

The ECP in its six petitions had urged the top court to transfer all its contempt cases against PTI leaders from different high courts to a single one.

The commission argued that it had issued contempt notices to PTI chairman and deposed premier Imran Khan as well as other party leaders including Asad Umar, Fawad Chaudhry in the months of August and September. However, these notices were challenged in high courts.

At the outset of the hearing today, the apex court issued notices to PTI leaders including Imran Khan, Asad Umar and Fawad Chaudhry, and fixed ECP pleas for hearing against stay orders issued by high courts in PTI contempt cases.

In set of petitions, the ECP argued that the high court orders were illegal and unlawful having effectively suspended Section 10 of the Elections Act, 2017, by restraining the ECP from taking ‘adverse action’ against the PTI leader.

The PTI chairman had submitted his reply to the ECP and admitted the institution’s right to conduct the contempt proceedings, read the petition.

On October 21, the Lahore High Court (LHC) rejected the ECP’s plea of dismissing stay order to Imran Khan and Fawad Chaudhry in election commission contempt case.

ARY
 
In a detailed reply submitted to the Supreme Court in a contempt case on Wednesday, PTI chief Imran Khan maintained that he was not made aware of the apex court’s order of May 25 that defined the limits for his party’s ‘Azadi March’ at the time and as such, “has not knowingly violated” any of its orders.

Imran is facing contempt proceedings for allegedly flouting the top court’s order regarding the party’s march on May 25 in a plea filed by the interior ministry.

The ministry has stated in the plea that the apex court had directed the PTI to hold its ‘Azadi March’ gathering in a ground located between sectors H-9 and G-9. But, Imran and his supporters made their way towards D-Chowk in alleged contravention of court orders, the plea said.

At the previous hearing, the court had given the PTI chairman a second chance to explain the alleged flouting of court orders during the May 25 march. Previously, Imran had said that he was not aware of any undertaking submitted by his party on his behalf that the May 25 “Azadi March” would not proceed to D-Chowk.


In his response submitted today, Imran maintained he was not made aware of the “detailed contents of the verbal order made by this honourable court at about 6:05pm” on May 25.

He said after a perusal of the order, it was clear that the court had directed the interior ministry secretary, Islamabad and Punjab inspectors general of police and the Attock deputy commissioner to facilitate a meeting between the “designated PTI leadership in Islamabad”, including his counsel Babar Awan, and him.

“No such meeting was facilitated,” he said.

The PTI chairperson further stated that his statements on May 25 while addressing his supporters at 6:45pm and in the following two hours “reflected the communication of the verbal order received by him from political workers”.

He linked the communication lapse to jammers installed in his container for security purposes, saying the devices “make direct communication through cellular phones impractical.

“Any inadvertent overstepping his sincerely regretted.”

Assuring the court of having directed his party members to carry out political activities in a dignified manner, he contended that an incomplete recording of his statements made at Chach Interchange in Attock in May 25 was played in the court, and an incomplete transcript of the same was submitted.

Based on the information he had received, Imran said, he had “relayed to the people of Pakistan the good news that this honourable court had directed [the] removal of obstructions to the exercise of the constitutional rights of the people as regards to movement and assembly”.

He maintained he had “called upon families (women and children) to attend the protest gathering at D-Chowk in the sincere belief that such a gathering would be peaceful and not in violation of any order of this honourable court.”

Moreover, Imran added, that his cavalcade was subjected to “obstruction and intense tear gas shelling at the behest of the provincial government and other involved agencies” upon reaching Chach Interchange in Attock.

It was in view of this “continuing brutality” that Imran had called upon PTI supporters and members to assemble at “what is known as ‘D-Chowk, Islamabad’ in order to register a peaceful protest against the unconscionable and unconstitutional violence perpetrated by the state authorities,” the PTI chief explained.

He contended that the call for D-Chowk was meant for holding “an immediate protest against the unprovoked violence” and that it was distinct from the planned political assembly, the permission for which was sought at the ground between G-9 and H-9 sectors along with an assurance that the party won’t cause any obstruction in the city.

Imran went on that when his lawyer Faisal contacted Umar, the later was in Islamabad, adding that Umar instructions were to reiterate PTI’s right to hold a “peaceful assembly” in the capital. “Umar also expressed resolve that all the political activities held on the part of PTI would be peaceful.

However, he pointed out, the answering respondent could not be contacted because of jammers. The PTI chief also clarified that Umar’s instructions were consistent with the party policy.

“Umar travelled from Islamabad to Wali Interchange, near Mardan in a helicopter and joined Imran’s cavalcade at 3pm on May 25,” Imran said, adding that henceforth there was not contract between Umar and the PTI lawyers.

He added that the court passed verbal orders on May 25 which were not or could not be directly communicated to the PTI and the written order was only issued on May 26 — the day after the march.

“However, various news channels carried reports regarding the court’s orders between 6:05pm and 6:45pm. Some of these programmes/news bulletins were viewed by some individuals travelling in vehicles that were 50 or more yards behind the vehicle in which the respondent [Imran] was travelling. “

Imran said that some of these people tried to reach to him and conveyed the court’s orders “in general terms as reported by the media”.

“The gist of the communication was that the honourable court was pleased to order the removal of all restrictions placed by the state to entry into Islamabad by the members and supporters of PTI,” he highlighted, adding that the reports run by news channels didn’t mention any bar been imposed by the SC against protesting at the D-Chowk, hence leading to a “misunderstanding”.

“Any misconception on the part of the answering respondent was entirely inadvertent and caused by the circumstances in which the verbal order passed by the court was understood by various news channels and then communicated by political workers to the answering respondent.”

Imran said that at that time he was also under extreme stress because of teargas shelling and violence perpetrated by the Punjab and federal authorities.

“The acts of violence that occurred during the evening of May 25 at various places in Islamabad were the consequences of state brutality and no act of violence was either intended or encouraged by the PTI,” the former premier contended.

He also clarified that the individuals who reacted to the violence did so in their own self-defence, adding that he had later called off the protest at D-Chowk for this reason alone.

“The reports filed on behalf of the ICT, the IB and the ISI contain references and presumptions not supported by facts,” Imran argued in his response, stating that he neither “flouted or disregarded” the orders passed by the apex court on May 25.

“It is respectfully submitted that the respondent remains committed to ensuring balance envisaged by the law and Constitution. There was no preplanned or organised resistance or reaction on the part of the respondent or the PTI to disproportionate violence and aggression that was deployed by the state.”

Imran also stressed that he remained committed to the rule of law and respect for the judiciary.

He then prayed that the case should be closed with the indulgence of the court.

The petition
The federal government, through the interior ministry, had approached the Supreme Court last week for initiating contempt of court proceedings against Imran for violating its May 25 order, wherein the PTI was restricted from holding its ‘Azadi March’ near Peshawar Mor between the H-9 and G-9 areas of Islamabad. However, Imran and his supporters made their way towards D-Chowk in alleged contravention of court orders.

According to the petition, the apex court had in its May order directed the PTI to hold a gathering on a ground located between sectors H-9 and G-9 in view of the categorical assurances on behalf of the party’s top leadership and their counsel that their rally would not cause any inconvenience or blockage of the Srinagar Highway or trouble the public and that the rally would be conducted in a peaceful and lawful manner.

Despite these assurances, the PTI top leadership, acting in blatant disregard for the directions, exhorted its supporters to reach D-Chowk, falsely professing that the court had allowed the march without any conditions, it added.

The contempt petition pleaded for the implementation of the apex court order for the protection of the fundamental rights of the public, particularly residents of Islamabad and Rawalpindi.

It also requested that the Supreme Court should also issue comprehensive guidelines for all future protests to be held in the federal capital that should include prior intimation of the date, selection of the venue, assurance of not causing any hindrance to public life and a commitment to ensure that the protesters would not cause any damage to public or private property.

The plea also claimed the tone and tenor adopted by the PTI chairman in his speeches against the incumbent rulers and state institutions was “highly inflammatory”, aimed at encouraging distrust and contempt and instigating revolt.

This had caused significant alarm not only among the public but also the international community and investors regarding the impact of this purported ‘jihad’, the petition claimed, adding the past conduct of the party head, especially the events of May 25 and his violation of court orders, his alleged encouragement of destruction of public and private property and disruption of law and order, merited strong directions from the apex court about his upcoming protests.
 
Imran refutes govt claims on D-Chowk protest
PTI chief says he had already decided to reach venue before SC orders

ISLAMABAD:
PTI Chairman Imran Khan on Thursday told the Supreme Court in the contempt proceedings against him that the he had decided to protest at Islamabad’s D-Chowk before its May 25 verdict on the matter.

“My party leaders and I were under immense pressure since May 24 because of the atrocities carried out against us and our activists by the government,” he added.

He was responding to the interior ministry’s submission to the court that the PTI chief had lied about not being aware of the top court’s orders that the party could stage its long march in the federal capital's sectors H-9 and G-9.

A five-member SC bench — headed by Chief Justice of Pakistan Umar Ata Bandial, resumed the hearing of the contempt case.

The interior ministry informed the court that “factual assertions” made by the PTI chief about the presence of jammers were “incorrect” and “wholly inaccurate” as it submitted to the SC live videos, messages, calls, feeds on social media, tweets etc from the official accounts of the party’s senior leadership.

It added that these social media activities showed that the PTI chief and his leaders were well-aware of the court orders.

“It is evident that false and incorrect statements have been made before the court by [Imran] Khan as he and his party willfully, intentionally and in contemptuous disregard of the order, engaged in urging and leading the supporters and workers to reach D-Chowk, inter alia, causing loss of property and violating fundamental rights of the public at large,” the ministry wrote.

In response, the PTI chief told the court that his party’s social media activities were under way from various places during his “Azadi March” -- urging supporters to reach Islamabad’s D-Chowk.

He added that his party was compelled to use social media because the government had banned the electronic media from giving coverage to his march.

Imran reiterated that he had already informed the court that he was unaware of the court’s orders because he was unable to communicate with his lawyers.

He added that the court had ordered the administration that a meeting should be arranged between him and his lawyers but it was never followed.

The PTI chief said he had never claimed that he could not communicate because of the presence of jammers.

The interior ministry told the court that on the morning of May 25, the PTI through its official social media account had asked its supporters to gather at D-Chowk.

PTI leaders Faisal Javed, Shireen Mazari and Manza Hasan had also tweeted, urging activists and supporters to gather at D-Chowk.

The ministry further informed the court that Imran's claim that party leader Asad Umar was instructed to reach H-9 Ground was contrary to the facts.

In fact, it added that on the afternoon of May 2, Imran had expressed his determination to reach D-Chowk in his two speeches made from the container.

The ministry said both the speeches were played live on PTI's official account. Therefore, the party's claim of installing jammers was contrary to the facts.

Express Tribune
 
A district and sessions court in Islamabad has admitted the Election Commission of Pakistan’s (ECP) plea against former prime minister Imran Khan in the Toshakana case.

The verdict on the admissibility of the plea was reserved on December 12 by the court after hearing arguments from both sides.

The additional session judge in his verdict fixed the plea for hearing on January 9 and issued notice to former prime minister Imran Khan to appear before in person before the court.
 
Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) chief and former premier Imran Khan's bail, in a case pertaining to protests against the ECP's decision to disqualify him, was extended by an anti-terror court on Monday.

A four-member bench of the ECP had declared Imran's National Assembly seat vacant as it unanimously decided that he had misled officials about the gifts he received from foreign dignitaries during his tenure as the prime minister.

Read Marriyum accuses Imran of corruption

The written ruling had read that the PTI chief had “intentionally and deliberately” violated the provisions contained in sections 137, 167 and 173 of the Elections Act, 2017 as he submitted a “false statement” and “incorrect declaration” to the ECP in the details of his assets and liabilities filed by him for the year 2020-21.

It had added that the PTI chief had attracted disqualification under Article 63(1)(p) of the Constitution read with Sections 137 and 173 of the Elections Act, 2017.

“Consequently he ceases to be a member of the National Assembly of Pakistan and his seat has become vacant accordingly,” it had read.

The PTI supporters and workers, led by local party leaders, had protested against the verdict on major and link roads in cities and towns, burning tyres, shouting slogans and at places clashing with police.

There were clashes between police and PTI supporters in Rawalpindi’s Faizabad Interchange, where reportedly one protester was injured. The police resorted to heavy teargas shelling to prevent the protesters from entering Islamabad.

The protests were called by senior PTI leader Fawad Chaudhry, who said that the party would challenge the ECP decision in the Islamabad High Court (IHC) and urged people to take to the streets “for their rights”.

Soon after the announcement, PTI workers blocked roads in many cities. The reports of roads and highways closure in various cities created a state of fear and uncertainty among the people.

Read More Elahi takes a dig at PTI chief, kicking up storm

In a video message, released after he was disqualified, Imran had said that he did not want the party workers to run into any trouble and had called off the protests by his supporters, telling his party’s workers to focus on the “long march” on Islamabad that would be “largest protest movement” in the country.

Nevertheless, a case was registered against the PTI Chairman at Sangjani police station after protests erupted after news broke that Imran had been disqualified by the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) in October.

During the hearing today, Imran's lawyer Babar Awan appeared before the court where he had filed a request for the court to excuse the PTI chief's absence on medical grounds.

Granting Imran exemption the court extended the bail until January 10 and adjourned proceedings until then.
 
The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Monday sought a report from the Cabinet Division on a petition seeking implementation of the decision of the Pakistan Information Commission (PIC) regarding the provision of Toshakhana gifts details since 1947 till date.

Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb heard the petition regarding the matter.

Deputy Attorney General Syed Ahsan Raza Shah apprised the court that he was not sure whether the Toshakhana record before 1990 was available.

“Such information should be present on websites,” he added.

The court instructed sharing of the record if available with the petitioner.

The petitioner’s counsel Waseem Abid said the Cabinet Division had refused to share the requested information on the grounds that it was classified.

Express Tribune
 
SC ALLOWS ECP TO CONTINUE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST IMRAN KHAN

The Supreme Court on Tuesday allowed the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) to go ahead with the contempt proceedings against former prime minister and Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan and other party leaders.

A three-member bench headed by Chief Justice Umer Ata Bandial and comprising Justice Ayesha A Malik and Justice Athar Minallah heard the ECP s petition seeking transfer and consolidation of cases filed by the PTI with different high courts challenging its contempt notices.

During today’s proceedings, the SC asked ECP to continue contempt proceedings against PTI chief Imran Khan, Fawad Chaudhry and Asad Umar.

“ECP should decide on objections raised by PTI according to law,” said SC and added, “Sindh and Lahore High Courts did not stop ECP from contempt proceedings against Imran and others.”

“The election commission is a constitutional body, how could a stay order be given on its proceedings,” SC questioned.

...
https://arynews.tv/sc-allows-ecp-to-continue-contempt-proceedings-against-imran-khan/
 
The Supreme Court (SC) on Tuesday allowed the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) to continue its proceedings against former premier Imran Khan, and his party leaders Asad Umar and Fawad Chaudhry, in cases related to the contempt of the electoral body.

The orders were passed by a three-member SC bench, headed by Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial and comprising Justice Athar Minallah and Justice Ayesha A Malik.

The ECP had during August and September last year issued contempt notices, in exercise of its powers of contempt, against PTI chief Imran Khan and party leaders Asad Umar, Fawad Chaudhry, Mian Shabbir Ismail and Danial Khalid Khokhar for allegedly using “intemperate” language against the chief election commissioner and ECP and asked them to appear in person or through their counsels before the commission to explain their position.

However, instead of appearing before the ECP, the PTI leaders challenged in various high courts the ECP notices and contempt proceedings on the grounds that Section 10 of the Elections Act 2017, which is the statutory provision regarding the commission’s power to punish for contempt, was against the Constitution.
 
Contempt case: ECP directs Imran Khan, Asad Umar, Fawad Chaudhry to appear
Contempt notice sent last year to Imran, Asad and Fawad for insulting commission during public meetings, pressers

In line with the directives given by the Supreme Court of Pakistan, the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) Monday directed Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan, Secretary General Asad Umar and Senior Vice President Fawad Chaudhry to appear before it on the next date of hearing in the contempt case.

A three-member bench, headed by Sindh Member Nisar Durrani, heard the contempt of the commission case against Imran, Asad and Fawad. The apex court has restrained the electoral body from issuing the final orders in the case till the PTI leaders’ petition was decided.

During the hearing, lawyer Ali Bukhari appeared on behalf of PTI leaders and took the stand that Fawad’s mother was seriously ill and he was in a hospital in Lahore with her. Also, his brother Faisal Chaudhry is a lawyer in this case and both brothers are with their mother at present. He continued that Imran has not yet been allowed to travel.

...
https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/1026895-contempt-case-ecp-directs-imran-asad-fawad-to-appear
 
Govt directed to give details of Toshakhana
Advocate Niazi had filed a request for the implementation of June 29 decision of PIC

Raising questions pertaining to the gifts received by presidents and prime ministers since 1947, the Islamabad High Court (IHC) has ordered the government to respond within a month.

IHC's Justice Mian Gul Hasan Aurangzeb issued a written order for the December 26 hearing.

As a petitioner, Advocate Abuzar Salman Khan Niazi filed a request for the implementation of the June 29 decision of the Pakistan Information Commission (PIC).

The court has written in its order that according to the petitioner, on April 23, the Cabinet Division was asked for information in this regard, to which it replied that the information is classified and cannot be provided.

Following this, it noted, the petitioner appealed against this to the PIC, who ordered on June 29 to provide the requested information under the Right to Information Act.

It is worth mentioning here that during the last hearing, Deputy Attorney General Syed Ahsan Raza Shah had apprised the court that he was not sure whether the Toshakhana record before 1990 was available.

“Such information should be present on websites,” he had added.

Justice Aurangzeb had asked why the petitioner was limiting the information to the extent of former presidents and prime ministers, and why the public servants should not be included in the list.

"This shows your intention," Justice Aurangzeb had remarked.

...
https://tribune.com.pk/story/2394316/govt-directed-to-give-details-of-toshakhana
 
The court in Islamabad will hear the Election Commission of Pakistan's (ECP) plea for starting criminal proceedings against PTI chairman and former premier Imran Khan in the Toshakhana (gift depository) reference on Monday (today).

District and Sessions Judge Zafar Iqbal has summoned the PTI chief in his personal capacity.

On December 15, the court had accepted the maintainability of the commission’s petition.

Express Tribune
 
Pointless, because there isn't an election coming.

Post a likely default expect the 'establishment & co' to engineer a mutually acceptable coup and replace shabaz with a PM bilawal led 'technocrat' govt.

Neutrals taking a back seat my foot!
 
IMRAN KHAN’S BAIL EXTENDED IN ECP PROTEST CASE

District and sessions court on Monday extended the bail of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf chairman Imran Khan in a case filed against him after demonstrations were held following his disqualification by the ECP in the Toushakhana case, ARY News reported.

As per details, distirct and sessions judge Zafar Iqbal resumed the hearing where the PTI chairman’s counsel Babar Awan told the court that the former prime minister and PTI chief Imran Khan is in Lahore and cannot appear before the court.

...
https://arynews.tv/imran-khans-bail-extended-in-ecp-protest-case/
 
ECP ISSUES ARREST WARRANTS FOR IMRAN KHAN, OTHER PTI LEADERS

The Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) on Tuesday issued bailable arrest warrants for Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan and other PTI leaders in a contempt case, ARY News reported.

The ECP had reserved the verdict of the case on January 3.

Former prime minister Imran Khan, PTI leaders Fawad Chaudhry and Asad Umar had sought immunity from attendance in the case which was turned by ECP bench today.

The ECP has directed PTI leaders to secure bail against surety bonds of worth Rs50,000 each before January 17.

...
https://arynews.tv/ecp-issues-arrest-warrants-for-imran-khan-other-pti-leaders/
 
Former prime minister and PTI Chairman Imran Khan has accused the Election Commision of Pakistan (ECP) of appointing media mogul Syed Mohsin Raza Naqvi as caretaker chief minister to 'rig' the upcoming elections in Punjab.

“Mohsin Naqvi has been appointed by the same people who redlined us. Now they will make all-out efforts to defeat our party in the elections through rigging,” he said in a televised news conference on Monday.

The PTI chairman's statement comes a day after the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) appointed Naqvi as the caretaker after the ruling party and the opposition in the province failed to reach consensus on any name for the post.

Also read: ECP picks Mohsin Naqvi as Punjab caretaker CM

In his address, Imran asked his supporters and party workers to stage protests outside ECP offices against Naqvi's appointment.

“I am inviting all of you to take to the streets from tomorrow for your future. If we accept his appointment then there would be no difference between us and sheep,” he remarked.

He accused the ECP of causing irreparable damage to the country, saying that he is going to challenge the appointment of the caretaker CM in court.

“I have never seen such a dishonest election commission. They always give verdicts against us. The names that we gave for caretaker chief minister were honest people.”

Imran said the role of caretaker set-up is like a “neutral umpire,” adding: “The appointment of Mohsin Naqvi proved the partiality of the election commission.”

“Mohsin Naqvi will appoint police officers and other bureaucrats who will rig the elections,” he alleged.

Express Tribune
 
The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Friday set aside a session court’s verdict that had declared the Toshakhana reference filed by the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) against the PTI chairman as maintainable for criminal proceedings.
 
Back
Top