What's new

No Trust Motion against PM Imran Khan dismissed, President dismisses the National Assembly

Petition now filed in SC. This will take days now. Also the fake Parliament session is so cringe.

Will be dismissed. As anything done in Parliament can't be challenged.

Will love the rhona dhona. These traitors should have gone after Musharraf, that's what they are. Traitors who sold the country, looted the country, absolutely destroyed the country.
 
Will be dismissed. As anything done in Parliament can't be challenged.

Will love the rhona dhona. These traitors should have gone after Musharraf, that's what they are. Traitors who sold the country, looted the country, absolutely destroyed the country.

I still have a simple question. If this is taken up by SC then can't Govt. file sedition charges on certain opposition leaders based on the "letter" and this case can be heard in tandem with the opposition petition? If that is the case then Govt. would have played this to perfection.
 
They have turned off the electricity in the National Assembly. Lol, is this a kindergarten?
 
I still have a simple question. If this is taken up by SC then can't Govt. file sedition charges on certain opposition leaders based on the "letter" and this case can be heard in tandem with the opposition petition? If that is the case then Govt. would have played this to perfection.

Charges based on what. Cable by your own ambassador to your foreign office ?
 
I still have a simple question. If this is taken up by SC then can't Govt. file sedition charges on certain opposition leaders based on the "letter" and this case can be heard in tandem with the opposition petition? If that is the case then Govt. would have played this to perfection.

I think the gov already filed that petition a couple of days ago.
 
Lol the Govt. has pulled off electricity whist fake Parliamentary session was going on. Historic embarrassment for opposition today in every sense of imagination.
 
I still have a simple question. If this is taken up by SC then can't Govt. file sedition charges on certain opposition leaders based on the "letter" and this case can be heard in tandem with the opposition petition? If that is the case then Govt. would have played this to perfection.

Yes this is what people are saying.

Opposition are done for.
 
Charges based on what. Cable by your own ambassador to your foreign office ?

Mate its more than just a cable, there are so many supplementary evidences to support this case which isn't even public information yet. This can be a massive knockout effect for opposition if its taken up by SC.
 
I believe no govt should be toppled based on no-confidence motion in a democracy. Governments are elected based on people's mandate and should only go if people vote against them in elections and not by a motion in parliament.

Even Modi faced no-confidence motion in 2019 but its a different story he won that in a landslide margin. The same day when Rahul Gandhi gave dumb speech and then winked :P
 
I believe no govt should be toppled based on no-confidence motion in a democracy. Governments are elected based on people's mandate and should only go if people vote against them in elections and not by a motion in parliament.

Even Modi faced no-confidence motion in 2019 but its a different story he won that in a landslide margin. The same day when Rahul Gandhi gave dumb speech and then winked :P

It is as per constitution. Constitution gives right to opposition to file no-confidence if they have numbers. Its just a transfer of power nothing else inside parliament. People of pakistan elects electibles means MNA's and MPA's for parliament. They dont elect PM or CM directly.
 
Let the traitors cry, they will have to explain why speaker's decision is false. Bring out the letter.

They're traitors. Not the opposition. Should be called by their right word.
 
Why the cynicism! Did NSC meeting attendees not verify the contents of the letter and agreed to send a strong demarche to the concerned embassy?
 
Certain posters are very silent now. IF SC gives a verdict in their favour, you will soon see them all over they forum.

When Chief Justice is opening the offices on a Sunday, anything can happen now.
 
I can't see the reason why some pak ppers are rejoicing so much. Pre mature election will be a burden on the common people and it will be these common people who will face the hardships more than anyone.
 
I can't see the reason why some pak ppers are rejoicing so much. Pre mature election will be a burden on the common people and it will be these common people who will face the hardships more than anyone.

There isnt any other choice.
 
The reason why vonc was happening was because of imran khans violation of the parliament during his govt.

The deputy speaker went against the constitution and pti fans are celebrating this on fb.......
 
I can't see the reason why some pak ppers are rejoicing so much. Pre mature election will be a burden on the common people and it will be these common people who will face the hardships more than anyone.

The first question should be, on what basis the oppostion took the step of initiating NCM? They should have let the ruling party complete it's reign and prepare for next election.
 
The reason why vonc was happening was because of imran khans violation of the parliament during his govt.

The deputy speaker went against the constitution and pti fans are celebrating this on fb.......

Chalo, the case is in SC now. Let's wait for the verdict.
 
The reason why vonc was happening was because of imran khans violation of the parliament during his govt.

The deputy speaker went against the constitution and pti fans are celebrating this on fb.......

But buying votes isn't unconstitutional, bringing the VOC on the orders of a Foreign isn't but this is unconstitutional. Let the SC decide and we will see. Great move by Kaptaan
 
The first question should be, on what basis the oppostion took the step of initiating NCM? They should have let the ruling party complete it's reign and prepare for next election.

NCM is a valid procedure and is exercised. It is to check if the house still has the confidence on the govt. NCM will give the verdict. If the house doesn't have any confidence on the govt, then it should be dismissed.
 
Just to let people know that if supreme court doesnt intervene, there is a chance a coup could takenplace now
 
Members of the joint opposition strongly protested the dismissal of the no-confidence vote against Prime Minister Imran by National Assembly Deputy Speaker Qasim Suri, as well as the premier's suggestion to dissolve legislative assemblies.

Following the session of the lower house, Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) leader Maryam Nawaz took to her official Twitter handle to state that no one should be allowed to “distort” the Constitution to save their seat.

Dubbing the premier “crazy and obsessive”, the PML-N leader said that it will be the “law of the jungle” in the country if Imran was not punished for his today's actions.

Talking to media personnel outside the NA, PML-N Spokesperson Marriyum Aurangzeb said that the prime minister was a traitor who had lost the support of the majority and therefore, could not dissolve assemblies nor could he dismiss the no-trust move through Suri.

Calling Imran’s move “unconstitutional”, she said the premier's actions will be taken to the Supreme Court. Marriyum also told the nation to be ready for a “surprise” from the opposition.

Pakistan People’s Party leader Sherry Rehman also said that a prime minister who had lost his majority could not dissolve the assembly.

“All actions today are unconstitutional, illegal and will take the country straight into a dangerous constitutional crisis,” she tweeted.

Read Deputy speaker dismisses no-trust motion against Imran, terms it against Article 5

She stated that the opposition did not accept a “minority” prime minister’s decision or the speaker’s ruling.

PPP's Mustafa Nawaz Khokhar took to Twitter to condemn the ruling party’s action, terming it a "blatant violation" of the Constitution and the rules.

The opposition member added that the apex court cannot and should not sit by as a mere spectator. “The chief justice should immediately take to the bench and save the country from a constitutional crisis!” he added.

PPP member Aseef Bhutto Zardari said that “the selected PM just ran away from Parliament, a Parliament he has lost his majority in”.

“The speaker of the National Assembly’s unconstitutional and undemocratic holding of proceedings today will be taken up in court,” she stated, adding that the opposition’s next stop was the Supreme Court.

Chairperson of the National Democratic Movement Mohsin Dawar called the move a “historical low in” parliamentary history, which showed the “fragility” of parliamentary democracy.

“The Deputy Speaker and the Prime Minister along with his team should be tried under Article 6,” he said, urging the apex court to step in and resolve the “constitutional crisis”.

PML-N member and MNA Ahsan Iqbal hoped for the "unprecedented humiliation" of PM Imran, claiming that Imran did not "possess even an iota" of grace or honour.
 
Seems like IK just opened up the pandoras box as last resort. Now all hell will break lose as it seems.
 
Just to let people know that if supreme court doesnt intervene, there is a chance a coup could takenplace now

Anyone but SS, NS,Billo and AZ. PK cannot be allowed to fall into the hands of treacherous criminals. Why are opposition scared of elections?
 
Anyone but SS, NS,Billo and AZ. PK cannot be allowed to fall into the hands of treacherous criminals. Why are opposition scared of elections?

I think the more severe issue should be, NCM being dismissed like this. If tomorrow, other parties exercise the same, will you support the action?
 
NCM is a valid procedure and is exercised. It is to check if the house still has the confidence on the govt. NCM will give the verdict. If the house doesn't have any confidence on the govt, then it should be dismissed.

Yes but the speaker can also reject a motion and citing article 5-A of the constitution as the basis of the decision seems solid enough. Whether it's a valid interpretation or not is with the SC now.
 
I think the more severe issue should be, NCM being dismissed like this. If tomorrow, other parties exercise the same, will you support the action?

We will cross that bridge when it comes to it. I am just glad that the mafia isn't in control after the 1st Ramadan
 
Just to let people know, the violation of law is that pm cant dissolve assembly till vonc takes place. This will be overturned by sc
 
NCM is a valid procedure and is exercised. It is to check if the house still has the confidence on the govt. NCM will give the verdict. If the house doesn't have any confidence on the govt, then it should be dismissed.

NCM is valid procedure, but you have to look at the background of this particular NCM.

Anyways let's see what SC decides now. Everything will be clear soon.
 
Just to let people know, the violation of law is that pm cant dissolve assembly till vonc takes place. This will be overturned by sc

No, the motion was dismissed. There was no motion hence the decision was not a violation of the law.

The SC now has to decide whether the speaker was right to dismiss the motion under article 5-A.
 
I think the more severe issue should be, NCM being dismissed like this. If tomorrow, other parties exercise the same, will you support the action?

That is how parliament is dissolved in a parliamentary democracy Canadian PM also dissolved the assembly and went for early elections just a couple of years ago. Same for Singapore. The ruling party decides if they want to go for early elections or complete their term.
 
The background of this particular NCM is hugely contraversial, hence the Supreme court will put this to the public, ELECTIONS.
 
The background of this particular NCM is hugely contraversial, hence the Supreme court will put this to the public, ELECTIONS.

That's what they should do go for elections and let the public decide. But IK has shown the true face of politicians, media and part of the establishment already it might be the turn of the judges. 1-2 months ago opposition would have been happy with early elections now they are scared. This is the same court that was not willing to pass judgement against another supreme court judges so we can't confident about what will happen.
 
No, the motion was dismissed. There was no motion hence the decision was not a violation of the law.

The SC now has to decide whether the speaker was right to dismiss the motion under article 5-A.

The SC can't over turn the speakers ruling.
 
Loving the rona dhona of the opposition :)))


Why are they shying away from elections? They know they don't stand any chance with the public.


Guys please spare a moment and offer your condolences to certain posters on here ;))
 
No, the motion was dismissed. There was no motion hence the decision was not a violation of the law.

The SC now has to decide whether the speaker was right to dismiss the motion under article 5-A.

SC has no power over speaker's decisions
 
Well played Imran! Just when the crooks thought they had you against the wall, you just destroyed every single one of them :))

There’s a reason why Imran is considered the greatest ever captain of Pakistan - the master tactician! Outstanding work once again!
 
The SC can't over turn the speakers ruling.

it certainly can. SC gives the interpretation of the constitution. It will need to decide whether speakers action tranlsates to the action of house or not. If it does not, then article 69 & article 5 won't be applicable here.
 
The SC can't over turn the speakers ruling.

They can. The speaker has cited article 5-A of the constitution as the basis for the dismissal of the no confidence motion. The SC can certainly rule whether it's the valid interpretation or not and if it isn't they can reverse the decision.
 
it certainly can. SC gives the interpretation of the constitution. It will need to decide whether speakers action tranlsates to the action of house or not. If it does not, then article 69 & article 5 won't be applicable here.
It's funny when Indians talk about Pakistan with such surety.


SC does not have jurisdiction over speaker's rulings.
 
Does violation of constitution mean that pm and deputy speaker can be hanged?
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Article 69 of the constitution mandates that no proceedings of the Parliament can be called into question by any court. Let’s see what SC says. <a href="https://t.co/RVVZrXKQsz">pic.twitter.com/RVVZrXKQsz</a></p>— Pansota (@Pansota1) <a href="https://twitter.com/Pansota1/status/1510559751125434369?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 3, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
There were more than 190 mnas that were aginast the gogt.

Just shows how badly imran performed
 
They can. The speaker has cited article 5-A of the constitution as the basis for the dismissal of the no confidence motion. The SC can certainly rule whether it's the valid interpretation or not and if it isn't they can reverse the decision.

Let's see. But if the SC say yes, then these guys are open to being done for treachery. And if not then we will have a govt that is seen as an American puppet.It's a win win for IK.
 
What a sublime masterstroke by Imran!

Now these traitors will have to fight each other for a seat, the ones that defected will be quaking in their boots and the public have essentially been given a referendum to vote for being American slaves or not.

Congrats to all Pakistanis.
 
There were more than 190 mnas that were aginast the gogt.

Just shows how badly imran performed

They thought they could form a govt without getting a mandate from the people.

Now they will have to scrape for their seats.
 
There were more than 190 mnas that were aginast the gogt.

Just shows how badly imran performed

IK has played a blinder, he has cornered the crooks. If the SC decide it wasn't a valid interpretation then we will have an American puppet regime in PK and if it says yes, then Article 5-A will lead to charges of sedition or worst. A Master stroke.
 
I can't see the reason why some pak ppers are rejoicing so much. Pre mature election will be a burden on the common people and it will be these common people who will face the hardships more than anyone.
Isn't the whole point of an election to allow the people to voice where they stand? If they are happy with the direction the leadership are taking them, they'll re-elect, otherwise they'll choose who they want. It's funny how the opposition are so eager in avoiding an election.
 
If the govt has lost confidence, election is the way forward

These crooks want to take control so they can rig the election
 
Isn't the whole point of an election to allow the people to voice where they stand? If they are happy with the direction the leadership are taking them, they'll re-elect, otherwise they'll choose who they want. It's funny how the opposition are so eager in avoiding an election.

aren't MNA already selected by the people? The govt will be just a combination of those 342 in whatever way they decide.

If for every NCM, you will dissolve the assembly, then it is hudge waste of resources which will fall under common people of re electing again and again and ultimately the cost of the whole procedure.

That's why there is option of intermin govt to avoid pushing these burdens to the people.
 
aren't MNA already selected by the people? The govt will be just a combination of those 342 in whatever way they decide.

If for every NCM, you will dissolve the assembly, then it is hudge waste of resources which will fall under common people of re electing again and again and ultimately the cost of the whole procedure.

That's why there is option of intermin govt to avoid pushing these burdens to the people.

The next election was only a year a way. We need an election to clear up this mess
 
Don't understand the shock and horror, early elections was the only out of this mess anyway.

Will a caretaker Govt be announced ?
 
aren't MNA already selected by the people? The govt will be just a combination of those 342 in whatever way they decide.

If for every NCM, you will dissolve the assembly, then it is hudge waste of resources which will fall under common people of re electing again and again and ultimately the cost of the whole procedure.

That's why there is option of intermin govt to avoid pushing these burdens to the people.

It won't be for every NCM, that is the point. If it was any ordinary NCM, it wouldn't have even come to this action from the speaker. And incase PTI had done it regardless, the court would have been rejected.

The National Security Council has already endorsed the PM's claims. For the supreme court to overthrow the ruling by the speaker, they have to say that the NSC statement is not correct and go into all that trouble.

The best and the most easy way forward is fresh elections.
 
It won't be for every NCM, that is the point. If it was any ordinary NCM, it wouldn't have even come to this action from the speaker. And incase PTI had done it regardless, the court would have been rejected.

The National Security Council has already endorsed the PM's claims. For the supreme court to overthrow the ruling by the speaker, they have to say that the NSC statement is not correct and go into all that trouble.

The best and the most easy way forward is fresh elections.

But doesn't NSC comes under PMO?
 
I have one question, if this is a valid constitutional move, then every time a govt faces a VONC they will ask the speaker, who invariably is from the ruling side to dismiss the motion.

So why even keep the VONC rule?
 
It won't be for every NCM, that is the point. If it was any ordinary NCM, it wouldn't have even come to this action from the speaker. And incase PTI had done it regardless, the court would have been rejected.

The National Security Council has already endorsed the PM's claims. For the supreme court to overthrow the ruling by the speaker, they have to say that the NSC statement is not correct and go into all that trouble.

The best and the most easy way forward is fresh elections.

Who are the members of NSC?
 
I have one question, if this is a valid constitutional move, then every time a govt faces a VONC they will ask the speaker, who invariably is from the ruling side to dismiss the motion.

So why even keep the VONC rule?

it seems like the speaker has "veto" system. If it is indeed valid, the speaker is exercising too much power imo.
 
Don't understand the shock and horror, early elections was the only out of this mess anyway.

Will a caretaker Govt be announced ?

Shock is some thought that because they are connected to Bhutto or Sharif, they get a free pass to becoming a PM - the will of the people can go to hell.
 
They thought they could form a govt without getting a mandate from the people.

Now they will have to scrape for their seats.

Surely, if the majority of the MPs (who were voted in by the population) are against the government, then the government has no Mandate
 
Loving how all of a sudden Indians are acting as experts on Pakistani constitution :))
 
While it’s definitely funny seeing opposition’s reaction lol but again dangerous precedent for future when any government facing this will utilize this motion.
 
While it’s definitely funny seeing opposition’s reaction lol but again dangerous precedent for future when any government facing this will utilize this motion.

Not really, as this would result in elections automatically so everything is reset. The opposition has been crying for elections for months. When they actually know their support is nothing compared to PTI so now don't want to face the public.

Its now or never for PTI, Imran and Pakistan to get rid of these people who have looted the country. I don't think even the establishment knew of this. I am hearing only 5 people knew off it.
 
Surely, if the majority of the MPs (who were voted in by the population) are against the government, then the government has no Mandate

I think that if someone defects parties then it should trigger an automatic by election and they should be made to fight for their seats again.

If this had been the case and then the PTI defectors won their seats again as part of the PDM then they would have a mandate.

We had a similar case recently in the UK when a Tory defected and joined the Labour party!
 
CJP takes notice of situation in country after dissolution of NA

Chief Justice of Pakistan Umar Ata Bandial has taken notice of the current situation in the country following the dismissal of a no-confidence motion against Prime Minister Imran Khan by National Assembly (NA) Deputy Speaker Qasim Suri and the subsequent dissolution of the NA by President Arif Alvi, the spokesperson of the apex court said on Sunday.

The weeks-long political turmoil in the country reached its climax today as the NA deputy speaker prorogued a much-awaited sitting of the lower house of parliament without allowing voting on a no-trust motion against PM Imran.

Dismissal of no-trust motion
Suri, who was chairing the session, dismissed the motion in a shock move, terming it against Article 5 of the Constitution, which states that "loyalty to the State is the basic duty of every citizen".

At the outset of the session, Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf's (PTI's) Fawad Chaudhry took the floor and referred to the clause, reiterating the premier's earlier claims that a foreign conspiracy was behind the move to oust the government.

"On March 7, our official ambassador was invited to a meeting attended by the representatives of other countries. The meeting was told that a motion against PM Imran was being presented," he said, noting that this occurred a day before the opposition formally filed the no-trust move.

"We were told that relations with Pakistan were dependent on the success of the no-confidence motion. We were told that if the motion fails, then Pakistan's path would be very difficult. This is an operation for a regime change by a foreign government," he alleged.

The minister questioned how this could be allowed and called on the deputy speaker to decide the constitutionality of the no-trust move.

At that, Suri noted that the motion was presented on March 8 and should be according to the law and the Constitution. "No foreign power shall be allowed to topple an elected government through a conspiracy," he said, adding that the points raised by the minister were "valid".

He dismissed the motion, ruling that it was "contradictory" to the law, the Constitution and the rules.

Angered by the NA proceedings, opposition parties decided to hold their own meeting in the lower house of parliament with PML-N's Ayaz Sadiq sitting on the speaker's seat.

They conducted their own proceedings with 195 lawmakers voting in favour of the no-confidence motion, according to PPP's Sherry Rehman.

Dissolution of NA
Subsequently, in another shock move, PM Imran, in an address to the nation, said he had advised the president to "dissolve assemblies".

He also congratulated the nation for the no-trust motion being dismissed, saying the deputy speaker had "rejected the attempt of changing the regime [and] the foreign conspiracy".

The premier further said he had written to the president with advice to dissolve the assemblies, adding that the democrats should go to the public and elections should be held so the people could decide who they wanted in power.

"Prepare for elections. No corrupt forces will decide what the future of the country will be. When the assemblies will be dissolved, the procedure for the next elections and the caretaker government will begin," he added.

President Alvi then dissolved the NA on PM Imran's advice under Article 58 of the Constitution.

Fawad Chaudhry confirmed the development in a tweet, adding that the cabinet, too, had been dissolved while PM Imran would continue in office under Article 224 of the Constitution, which is related to elections and by-elections.

Meanwhile, PTI's Farrukh Habib said new elections would be held in 90 days.

These developments unfolded as opposition leaders lambasted the government for what they called a blatant violation of the Constitution and urged the SC to take notice of the situation and intervene.

'Political decisions shouldn't be taken in courtrooms'
Later, Fawad Chaudhry spoke to the media outside the SC and asserted that parliament was a separate institution and today's NA ruling couldn't be challenged in any court.

"Political decisions shouldn't be taken to courtrooms. I feel the processes have now moved forward," he said.

Chaudhry revealed that the president had dissolved the NA on the prime minister's advice and within 90 days elections would be held.

Within two to three days, he said, a letter would be sent to "former leader of Opposition Shehbaz Sharif", seeking "their names for the interim government".

Responding to a question, he added that the army had no relevance with the current situation. "This matter relates to parliament," he said.

https://www.dawn.com/news/1683235/cjp-takes-notice-of-situation-in-country-after-dissolution-of-na
 
AGP guaranteed voting on no-confidence motion will happen

The much-awaited vote on the no-confidence motion against Prime Minister Imran Khan was abruptly dismissed and deemed "unconstitutional" by the deputy speaker during the National Assembly session on Sunday.

"I, as the deputy speaker, give the ruling that the no-confidence motion against PM Imran Khan is being rejected," Suri said while adjourning the session for an indefinite period.

Following the dismissal of the session, President Dr Arif Alvi has dissolved the National Assembly on the proposal of Prime Minister Imran Khan.

Angered by the "unconstitutional" move, the joined Opposition moved the Supreme Court of Pakistan and demanded the deputy speaker's decision be declared null and void.

The government seems to be confident about the decision to call the vote of no-confidence motion off and dissolve the assembly, maintaining that it is within the ambit of the Constitution. Former information and law minister Fawad Chaudhry has even said that the decision "cannot be challenged in any court of law."

On the other hand, the Attorney General of Pakistan Khalid Jawed Khan had guaranteed on March 23 that the vote of no-confidence would go ahead as planned.

Geo News anchorperson Hamid Mir, while talking to the AGP during his show, had asked what would happen if the speaker decided not to hold the vote of no-confidence.

In response, the AGP had said that he "did not see that happening," adding that the powers of the speakers were "not unlimited."

"As I had earlier said, the speaker will have to allow the voting to take place," the AGP said. "This is a requirement of the Constitution that the voting has to be conducted within seven days of the submission of the resolution."

He said that how the voting is carried out is the internal matter of the House, but it "cannot happen that the voting would be suspended for an indefinite time."

"I would also like to clarify that the proceedings taking place in the Supreme Court and those happening in the National Assembly are totally independent of each other", he said, adding that whatever opinion the SC will issue will definitely have an impact.

"However, the proceedings of the vote of no-confidence will continue," he had said. "We [the government] have neither asked the SC for any stay orders nor will we appeal to the court to stop it."

The AGP had said that the House has its own sovereignty, but the opinion of the Supreme Court is binding.

https://www.geo.tv/latest/409296-watch-agp-guaranteed-voting-on-no-confidence-motion-will-happen
 
I think that if someone defects parties then it should trigger an automatic by election and they should be made to fight for their seats again.

If this had been the case and then the PTI defectors won their seats again as part of the PDM then they would have a mandate.

We had a similar case recently in the UK when a Tory defected and joined the Labour party!

Not sure about Pakistani constitution, but in India and Britain, we vote for the MP, not the party. So if an MP defects, he simply takes his seat with him.

You’ll remember the Change UK defections in 2019, a another Tory to Lib Dem defection last year. Neither led to a by-election
 
Not really, as this would result in elections automatically so everything is reset. The opposition has been crying for elections for months. When they actually know their support is nothing compared to PTI so now don't want to face the public.

Its now or never for PTI, Imran and Pakistan to get rid of these people who have looted the country. I don't think even the establishment knew of this. I am hearing only 5 people knew off it.

Man I'm amazed at this brilliant move.


He got NSC (the establishment basically) to first endorse the 'letter' as a foreign conspiracy and then used that to get the speaker to dismiss the No Confidence Motion. On top of that even though speaker rulings cannot be questioned in court, even if SC asks questions PTI can respond that even NSC endorsed there is a foreign conspiracy. Wow wow wow :raja


Well played Imran Khan :))
 
Back
Top