What's new

Pak V Eng: ODI No 1: Lahore: Score updates and discussion thread (Eng innings)

Status
Not open for further replies.
we might have to chase another 350

seeing the depth in English batting
 
Mutazalzaluzzaman Tarar said:
some of us think before we post. so, not all us suffer from verbal diarrhea.

its tough to remain calm when you can't back up your words with logic isnt it? koi nahee bhai, hota hay. :)
 
OUTTTTTTT

great stumping by the lil keeper... we really needed a wicket now.. and that of him too..
 
Pieterson gone!!! Clever bowling from Malik and smartly stumped by Kami.
 
WOW Majority of the last few pages have been on fighting b.w foruumers ON RAMEEZ
 
It was signalled wide by Hair. I was wondering, can a batsman be given out if he is stumped on a noball?
 
badxhah said:
WOW Majority of the last few pages have been on fighting b.w foruumers ON RAMEEZ

Wanna fight with me huh ?
 
Pieterson in the end paid for getting too cocky. He aint no Afridi and that was a subtle reminder for him.
 
Regarding the Rules


Say if Kaneria has Bowled his 10 overs .... can we bring in Arshad Khan?
 
Raz said:
Pieterson in the end paid for getting too cocky. He aint no Afridi and that was a subtle reminder for him.

But nuqsaan kar gaya !
 
pacman said:
It was signalled wide by Hair. I was wondering, can a batsman be given out if he is stumped on a noball?

NO! u can only be run out off a NO-ball.
 
pacman said:
But you can be runout, why not stumped? The batsman is out of his crease.

runout belongs to the fielder. stumping goes to the bowler who bowled it illegally.
 
badxhah said:
Sir App Lassi Pee kar aye hai .. Meinaay abhi Jam toast Kahaye sirf ;;;;

Kisi or Din Miggy Bahi ;-)

You can run but you cant hide ....
 
You can be stumped off a no ball, you cant be caught, bowled or lbw of a no ball
 
nafajafam said:
isnt stumping similiar to a run out? maybe it should be out
yaly it is out
are u seeing first time stumping on a wide ball.
salain and tendulakar used to do it a lot wheever batsman comes out of crease early they just send wide ball for stumping
 
team-pak said:
runout belongs to the fielder. stumping goes to the bowler who bowled it illegally.

Yes, I understand. But it must be a tricky situation. Cause a keeper can claim the wicket as a runout. The wicket should go to the keeper then :13:
 
Very encouraging so far. Unless we have a major collapse we'll get 300. Blackwell, Flintoff, Gojo, Collingwood can all smash it miles. As i speak some good fielding by Sami and 2 more the Strauss. 202-3
 
overlord said:
Regarding the Rules


Say if Kaneria has Bowled his 10 overs .... can we bring in Arshad Khan?


yes you can always substitute Kaneria with Arshad

but he wont be allowed to bowl if Kaneria already has been bowled out
 
Imy said:
You can be stumped off a no ball, you cant be caught, bowled or lbw of a no ball
it was a wide ball not no ball.
I am not sure whether u can be stumped on a no ball..I ghuess not
 
Hussain said:
yes you can always substitute Kaneria with Arshad

but he wont be allowed to bowl if Kaneria already has been bowled out


What if the replacement is after 9 Kaneria overs?
 
what a write off a rule this is then .... always making it a 12 against 11 game
 
deadly_man said:
yaly it is out
are u seeing first time stumping on a wide ball.
salain and tendulakar used to do it a lot wheever batsman comes out of crease early they just send wide ball for stumping

you took it off context. my query was regarding to a stumping off a no-ball.
 
our bowlers aint doing nothing, england are goona post a massive total at this rate
 
zushy_786 said:
So RH where were you during test series....Showing your true colours coming when england are supposedly doing well.....

:)) hes abit like ian botham.
 
The Swings and Roundabouts rule states clearly that Hair will not give Clean bowleds out in Pak innings - yep it all equals out in the end....
 
MenInGreen said:
The Swings and Roundabouts rule states clearly that Hair will not give Clean bowleds out in Pak innings - yep it all equals out in the end....

the lassi has filled you with optimism. :10:
 
MenInGreen said:
The Swings and Roundabouts rule states clearly that Hair will not give Clean bowleds out in Pak innings - yep it all equals out in the end....
I think the swing and roundabout rule will cause Hair to give contentious decisions in the second innings, and when asked about it, he'll say he gave 2 or 3 decisions that were out, not out, then 2 or 3 decisions that were not out, out. In the long run, they evened out
 
nafajafam said:
you took it off context. my query was regarding to a stumping off a no-ball.
for no ball I think its not out because its an illigal delivery.
and there is a clear difference between stumping and run out as some people were saying that keeper can claim it to be a run out
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top