PAK VS INDIA | 4th ODI|Multan [16/2/06]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh deary me!

Inzi leading an admirable counter attack on his home ground. If we loose another 2 before the 35th over, Imran Farhat will have to feature to save us from a dismal total.
 
Damnit !!!! MoYo out, caught by Dhoni, caught at the second attempt. Pakistan dig deeper into trouble
 
If 6 batsmen couldn't do the job, the 7th one isn't going to help much.

Pakistan shouldn't have used the sub at all.
 
Ace Base said:
If 6 batsmen couldn't do the job, the 7th one isn't going to help much.

Pakistan shouldn't have used the sub at all.

and score 180?
 
No point not using the sub! He is kept there for this type of situation! Pak have nothing to bowl on anyway so might as well use the sub!!!!
 
the true passionist said:
can farhat be the hero?

i doubt it but inshallah he will be a hero today with inzimam
inshallah
 
Last edited:
Pretty much in the bag for India. They have taken the series. Even if we manage 280 it will not be adequate as we saw in the last match!!!!
 
Ace Base said:
If 6 batsmen couldn't do the job, the 7th one isn't going to help much.

Pakistan shouldn't have used the sub at all.

Disagree. Based on that logic, we should always play 5 batsmen instead of 6. If 5 can't do the job, then one more isn't going to help much.
 
by the way who takes the desion while caption is in middle abt supersub..I mean who is going to be substituted for whom
 
deadly_man said:
nice decision
and in next match I hope he come out opening the inning in place of BUTT

Is this the same BUTT who scored a century 2 matches ago???
 
nafajafam said:
Wonder what's going through Inzi's mind


Biryani + runs +lassi+runs+Parathas+runs+Haleem+runs= Wth too much thinkin i might go to sleep
 
ouch, 5th wicket down

but 39 for 6 and we still won (6 wickets down mean we only had 4 more to go)
 
kashmiri said:
ouch, 5th wicket down

but 39 for 6 and we still won (6 wickets down mean we only had 4 more to go)

True but in a test you have the second innings to make up for the first.
 
Ace Base said:
Better 180 and have an extra bowler to help you defend the score, than 240 and one bowler short.

You cant defend 180 with 11 bowlers on this pitch, we have 4 seamers as it is.
 
Blistering Barnacle said:
Disagree. Based on that logic, we should always play 5 batsmen instead of 6. If 5 can't do the job, then one more isn't going to help much.

To extrapolate:

If 4 can't do the job, then no point playing the 5th.

If 3 can't do the job, no point playing 4

And so on.

I'm talking about balance here.

As I said in an earlier post, an extra batsman will get you to 240, probably, but you have one hell of a job defending that score with a bowler short.
 
kashmiri said:
ouch, 5th wicket down

but 39 for 6 and we still won (6 wickets down mean we only had 4 more to go)
Sir its time to stop resting on past victories like indians do(hey remeber we beat u in every WC cup mactch then lost the nest 2000 ODis to u ) btw that was test cricket
 
Comon boys you need to stick it out for another 10 overs atleast. Keep going
 
Ace Base said:
To extrapolate:

If 4 can't do the job, then no point playing the 5th.

If 3 can't do the job, no point playing 4

And so on.

I'm talking about balance here.

As I said in an earlier post, an extra batsman will get you to 240, probably, but you have one hell of a job defending that score with a bowler short.

Pakistan have 3 specialist bowlers and 2 all-rounders. The only bowler missing is Afridi. Farhat has taken his place and he can also bowl a few overs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top