What's new

Pakistan and India confirm ceasefire ‘with immediate effect’

Rana said:
He basically admits it was India who took a back step
Click to expand...
Lmao.. you have serious reading comprehension issues... India came hit and ended the war without getting hit ... Instead of getting stuck in 3 year long wars like Russia or Israel... Look at the effect.. your Munir is denying but the jem and lashkar bosses are crying and livid at the incomeptence of Pak military... Imagine giving your life for the country and the incompetent air force can't even protect deep bases inside the country even with 15 days warning
 
straighttalk said:
Lmao.. you have serious reading comprehension issues... India came hit and ended the war without getting hit ... Instead of getting stuck in 3 year long wars like Russia or Israel... Look at the effect.. your Munir is denying but the jem and lashkar bosses are crying and livid at the incomeptence of Pak military... Imagine giving your life for the country and the incompetent air force can't even protect deep bases inside the country even with 15 days warning
Click to expand...
Comprehension?

Sardar Jee clearly said they didn’t want to continue. How are your objectives completed if the people you are attacking launched a series of missiles as a response a couple of days later?

So Pakistan did Terrorism apparently…Were attacked….and then Pakistan responded with a heavier attack…and then India decided they have had enough?

So the last Chappair was Pakistan’s on India’s boothi?
 
Rana said:
Comprehension?

Sardar Jee clearly said they didn’t want to continue. How are your objectives completed if the people you are attacking launched a series of missiles as a response a couple of days later?

So Pakistan did Terrorism apparently…Were attacked….and then Pakistan responded with a heavier attack…and then India decided they have had enough?

So the last Chappair was Pakistan’s on India’s boothi?
Click to expand...

India killed a bunch of innocent civilians. Operation Tandoor Chief called it a successful operation. What a coward! Killing civilians is apparently a success for him.

Pakistan should've smashed them more. They had 20 Indian jets on lock but they only crashed 6. Should've gone for all 20. :inti
 
The Bald Eagle said:
So the Indians have found their missing chief... thankfully they didn't claim he was recovered too from Balochistan as an enforced disappearance
Click to expand...
This guy came out earlier and said something about India not being financially equipped enough to sustain a long war

Now he basically reiterates the same thing….that to step back was to avoid a longed out conflict to avoid economical strains


Seems like the Indian military is close to bankrupt!
 
Rana said:
Why hasn’t the attacks on Indian armed personal stopped after Sindoor?
Click to expand...

Good question.

The answer is Operation Tandoor was a complete failure. It was the most failed military operation in India's history. :inti
 
'World should learn from India': Air Chief Marshal AP Singh on Russia-Ukraine conflict, Israel war

Indian Air Force chief, Air Chief Marshal AP Singh, has called on the international community to study India's approach to ending military conflicts. Singh referenced Operation Sindoor as evidence of how conflicts can be quickly and decisively concluded once objectives are met. Operation Sindoor, launched by India's armed forces on 7 May against Pakistani terror infrastructure, concluded with a ceasefire after only four days of fighting.

The operation followed a terrorist attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam, which resulted in the deaths of 25 civilians. ACM Singh emphasised that India's strategy focused on achieving clear anti-terror goals before halting further hostilities, marking a sharp contrast with prolonged wars elsewhere.

"The main wars that are going on today, be it Russia, Ukraine or the Israel war. They are going on, years have passed, because no one is thinking about conflict termination. I think the world has to learn a lesson from India about how to start and terminate a conflict at the earliest possible opportunity," the Air Force chief said at an event in Delhi.

Operation Sindoor's airstrikes destroyed nine terror launch pads and killed over 100 terrorists in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. India's air defence systems thwarted retaliatory drone and missile attacks from Pakistan, preventing further escalation or damage. The operation's goals were anti-terrorism, and India limited its strikes to terrorist and military targets.

Singh explained that once objectives were met, prolonging conflict would only increase costs. "We heard that people said that no, we should have done a little more. We stopped the war very quickly. Yes, they (Pakistan) were on the back foot, no doubt, but what was our objective? Our objective was anti-terrorism. We had to strike them. We had done that. So if our objectives have been met, then why should we not terminate a conflict? Why should we carry on? Because any conflict has a lot of price which has to be paid," Singh emphasised.

He added that continuing hostilities after meeting objectives would undermine preparedness for future missions and affect India's economic progress.

India halted the offensive on 10 May with a ceasefire agreement, after warning Pakistan that further actions would result in a stronger response. No significant damage was reported on the Indian side, while the operation delivered a severe blow to terror networks.

The decision for a rapid ceasefire has faced political scrutiny, with opposition figures questioning its timing. Congress leader Rahul Gandhi criticised Prime Minister Narendra Modi, stating, "Prime Minister Narendra Modi 'surrendered' to the pressure by Trump, who was the first one to announce the ceasefire on May 10."

www.businesstoday.in

'World should learn from India': Air Chief Marshal AP Singh on Russia Ukraine conflict, Israel war - BusinessToday

ACM Singh emphasised that India's strategy focused on achieving clear anti-terror goals before halting further hostilities, marking a sharp contrast with prolonged wars elsewhere.
www.businesstoday.in www.businesstoday.in
 
Rana said:
Comprehension?

Sardar Jee clearly said they didn’t want to continue. How are your objectives completed if the people you are attacking launched a series of missiles as a response a couple of days later?

So Pakistan did Terrorism apparently…Were attacked….and then Pakistan responded with a heavier attack…and then India decided they have had enough?

So the last Chappair was Pakistan’s on India’s boothi?
Click to expand...
See this is why I said you lack reading comprehension

You killed 26 innocents.. clear victory for Islamic terrorists
We killed the terrorist many months later... But they are scum of the earth . Their lives have zero value.. so casualties wise it's your victory.

But after that let's recount the available evidence

Multiple videos .. acceptance by dgispr of 9 terror bases hit. You have your terrorisrs leaders on camera claiming. That India hit and killed their fellow jehadis. Every one of these have evidence.

You claimed 6 jets down but showed no proof. But our CDS said there were jets lost but no lives lost and number is less than 6. Jets are meant to achieve strategic objectives we did


There after radar stations and hq9 battery were damaged... Admitted by dgispr .

11 airbases hit with full satellite images.

You did launch attack but where is the proof of damage inflicted. No satellite images and modi went to udhanpur with s400 intact. Ny time checked satellites and your buddies in China have satellite images.

Your own newspaper showed 155 martyrs.. our media and army accepted 13 martyrs.

So you can either show conclusive evidence or refute or challenge me on any of the above claims

If you start thinking as a neutral you will realize that other than the 26 lives taken at the beginning. And one or two jets down .. India inflicted damage after damage and completely nullified Chinese low quality defense.. India achieved all its objectives... Hit and killed the terrorists, inflicted heavy deaths on Pak army . 155 , damaged PAF airbases and got few jets down too, no one in the world cares about Kashmir, IWT is banned ..

What did Pakistan achieve.. other than empty threats on iwt which still remains suspended btw

What IAF chief was said.. we could go on and completely destroy Pak air force and army given that they were defenseless.. but doing that would not achieve any of India's objective.. it's just death for deaths sake.. and Pak will respond with Ballastic missiles etc which would cause damage on Indian side and war would escalate... So the smart decision was to accept paks request for ceasefire and get out after dominating a defeated enemy.. who won have guts to do anything for next 30 years... It's as simple as that.. hence I said you lack reading comprehension... Imagine you start a operation after getting hit for 4 days and end it in 4 hours with 0 evidence of damage... Hai Allah...
 
straighttalk said:
What IAF chief was said.. we could go on and completely destroy Pak air force and army given that they were defenseless.. but doing that would not achieve any of India's objective.. it's just death for deaths sake.. and Pak will respond with Ballastic missiles etc which would cause damage on Indian side and war would escalate... So the smart decision was to accept paks request for ceasefire and get out after dominating a defeated enemy.. who won have guts to do anything for next 30 years... It's as simple as that.. hence I said you lack reading comprehension... Imagine you start a operation after getting hit for 4 days and end it in 4 hours with 0 evidence of damage... Hai Allah...
Click to expand...

but here is the problem ... you do not understand the typical Pakistani mentality. In their minds since India is a much larger army and if they accepted a ceasefire it ONLY means that they were about to lose. ( I kid you not !! ). This is why a brutal and very visible beatdown is the only way to settle this. Heck there is no shortage of people who still think that 1965 and 1971 were clear victories :facepalm:


@Hitman​
@Rajdeep
@Vikram1989
@Devadwal
 
Congress’s ‘huglomacy in deep freeze’ dig at Modi govt after Marco Rubio repeats India-Pakistan claim

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said President Donald Trump deserves “tremendous credit” for reshaping America’s foreign policy and brokered several peace deals, including the “very dangerous ones like India and Pakistan”.

Reacting to the latest claim by the US, senior Congress leader Jairam Ramesh Wednesday took a jab at the Centre, claiming that “no wonder the Modi-Trump huglomacy is in deep freeze,” with the US side repeatedly contradicting Delhi’s claims over Operation Sindoor.

What did Marco Rubio say?

During a Cabinet meeting at the White House Tuesday, Marco Rubio said for the first time in decades, American foreign policy was guided solely by whether it made the US “safer, stronger and more prosperous”.

“If it is, he’s (Trump) for it. If it doesn’t, he’s against it. And that sort of clarity is transformational,” he said.

“Not to mention all the other peace deals, very dangerous ones like India and Pakistan or Cambodia and Thailand, and so on… Mr President, I think you deserve tremendous credit for the transformational aspect of our foreign policy,” Rubio said.

Earlier, at the Cabinet meeting, Donald Trump reiterated his claim that he had resolved several global conflicts, including that between India and Pakistan, as he asserted that he should receive the Nobel Peace Prize for each of the “eight wars” he has ended.

“We ended eight wars… But we’re going to do one more, I think, I hope,” the Republican president said, referring to the Russia-Ukraine conflict.

Trump has repeatedly claimed that within the first eight-nine months of his second term in the White House, he resolved conflicts between India and Pakistan, Thailand and Cambodia, Armenia and Azerbaijan, Kosovo and Serbia, Israel and Iran, Egypt and Ethiopia, Rwanda and Congo. He also credits himself for resolving the Israel-Hamas conflict.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters on Monday that Trump will host Congo President Felix Antoine Tshisekedi Tshilombo and Rwanda President Paul Kagame to sign a “historic peace and economic agreement” brokered by the US president.

India has consistently denied any third-party intervention.

Congress takes dig at Modi govt

“On May 10, 2025, at 5:37 PM, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio was the first person to announce the abrupt stoppage of Operation Sindoor. Subsequently, President Trump himself has made the claim at least 61 times in 6 different countries that it was due to his intervention that Operation Sindoor was halted. Now Mr. Rubio has once again reminded the world of what Mr. Trump has been saying repeatedly,” Jairam Ramesh posted on X.

“No wonder the Modi-Trump huglomacy is in deep freeze,” he added.

Earlier on November 20, the Congress MP had said the annual report by the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission was a “severe setback” for diplomacy, as the report described the Pahalgam terror attack as an “insurgent attack” and hinted at Pakistan’s success over India during Operation Sindoor.

In an X post, Ramesh targeted Prime Minister Narendra Modi, describing the report as “astonishing and beyond understanding” while asking the External Affairs Ministry to register a protest against it.

 
Pakistan extends airspace ban for Indian aircraft till Jan 23

The Pakistan Airports Authority (PAA) on Wednesday extended the airspace restrictions on Indian aircraft till January 23.

The extension was notified a week before the previous one was set to expire on December 24.

“Pakistan airspace will remain closed to Indian-registered aircraft, including all aircraft owned, operated, or leased by Indian airlines, as well as Indian military flights,” the authority said,

“According to the NOTAM, the restriction, which has already been in force, will continue until January 23, 2026, as per the specified timings,” it said.

Pakistan’s airspace is divided into two flight information regions (FIRs) — Karachi and Lahore, according to a Pakistan Civil Aviation Authority (PCAA) document from 2022. The Notam applies to both the Karachi (OPKR) and Lahore (OPLR) FIRs.

India and Pakistan have closed their airspaces to each other’s airlines since tensions between them escalated in late April in the wake of an attack in occupied Kashmir’s Pahalgam that killed 26 people.

New Delhi, without evidence, had alleged that Islamabad backed the attack. Pakistan strongly denied any involvement and offered a neutral probe. Then, in early May, the nuclear-armed nations fought their fiercest military conflict in decades. Pakistan says it downed seven Indian jets during the conflict.

Amid a financial toll from a ban on Indian carriers flying over Pakistan, it was reported in November that Air India was lobbying the Indian government to convince China to let it use a sensitive military airspace zone in Xinjiang to shorten routes.


www.dawn.com

Pakistan extends airspace ban for Indian aircraft till Jan 23

Extension notified a week before the previous one was set to expire on December 24.
www.dawn.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Ball Blazer
  • Poll Poll
Will Pakistan and India relations improve in 2026?
Replies
22
Views
217
straighttalk
S
BouncerGuy
  • Poll Poll
Operation Bunyan ul Marsoos - Objective of Pakistan?
Replies
65
Views
4K
uppercut
U
Ball Blazer
  • Poll Poll
Will the ceasefire agreed between Pakistan and India hold?
2 3
Replies
216
Views
7K
DeadlyVenom
D
R
India's Modi tells Trump there was no US mediation in ceasefire with Pakistan
2
Replies
138
Views
5K
Patriot
Patriot
Lonewarrior
US report mentions Pakistan’s ‘military success’ over India in May conflict
2
Replies
111
Views
1K
finalfantasy7
finalfantasy7
Back
Top