What's new

Pakistan end Day 2 on 154/3 in reply to New Zealand's score of 449 all-out

This Bazball China copy business needs to stop

We have a model for winning such contests - the Misbah grind out approach - follow that and just win.

England were an exception - no need to follow them and make fools of ourselves

You need naturally attacking batsmen like Umar Akmal and Haider to play aggressive test cricket not slow players who will fail more often.

The selectors and coaches are that bad currently anyone who’s never been involved in the cricket team and is simply an observer could do a better job.
 
Another 50 for Mr Consistent Imam

He is one of the biggest asset for the Pakistan team
 
Saud can play fairly fluently but not sure why in some innings he play too conservatively, perhaps instruction given not to attack as Pakistan lost 3 quick wickets and tire out opposition.
 
You need naturally attacking batsmen like Umar Akmal and Haider to play aggressive test cricket not slow players who will fail more often.

The selectors and coaches are that bad currently anyone who’s never been involved in the cricket team and is simply an observer could do a better job.

How good is Haider against the spin?
 
I remember crowd cheering and applauding like crazy when Dravid once got his first run on 40th ball. Dravid even raised his bat to acknowledge:))
 
NZ bowling attack lacking penetration. Allowing Saud Shakeel to score at a rate slower than Boycs' grandma.
 
Saud can play fairly fluently but not sure why in some innings he play too conservatively, perhaps instruction given not to attack as Pakistan lost 3 quick wickets and tire out opposition.

Or bore them to death.
 
Pakistan have been a terrible test team in their home conditions. Still struggling for their first win vs any of Aus/Eng/NZ/Ind/Argentina/Portugal/France.
 
...and Shakeel the obstructer on a mission to defend the fortress.
 
If Imam gets out before his century will he break the chair leg or his own leg considering he loses his cool frequently.
 
Would love to hear Sunny Gavaskar's view on Saud's approach today.
 
Pakistan have been a terrible test team in their home conditions. Still struggling for their first win vs any of Aus/Eng/NZ/Ind/Argentina/Portugal/France.

They're a terrible test team period, absolute minnow level.
 
Imam once again saving Pakistan

Most unfairly criticized player among all teams
 
ACAkMOQ.png
 
Not one wicket taking delivery in 47 newzealand overs.

Paksitan could have easily been 200/0.
 
One thing for sure Pakistan ain't winning it, lot of work to do NZ definitely ahead
 
The bottom line is that a 100 run 10th wicket partnership is completely unacceptable.

I don't mind our wickets as we were playing positively which is what we need to do if we want to somehow win this game....even the run out, these things happen. But a 10th wicket partnership of 100+ runs is a disgrace.
 
At Karachi National Stadium: Black Caps 449 all out in 131 overs (Devon Conway 122, Tom Latham 71, Matt Henry 68no; Abrar Ahmed 4-149, Naseem Shah 3-71, Agha Salman 3-75) met Pakistan 154-3 in 47 overs (Imam-ul-Haq 74no)

There isn’t much you can do in cricket that is worse than running out your captain.

But there is running out your captain then falling soon after yourself.

So as he walked off the field Karachi National Stadium at stumps on day two, Imam-ul-Haq could at least be glad he hadn’t done that.

He might have sold Babar Azam down the river for 24, but he was not out on 74 with Pakistan 154-3 in reply to the Black Caps’ total of 449, trailing by 295.

Saud Shakeel was alongside him on 13 having taken 42 balls to get off the mark, and the contest was as evenly balanced as it had been when the day began with the visitors 309-6 in their first innings.

Early on, it looked like Pakistan might have been able to dismiss New Zealand for under 400, with Ish Sodhi, Tim Southee and Tom Blundell all falling quickly, the latter after making 51.

Then came a 104-run partnership for the 10th wicket between Matt Henry, who finished unbeaten on 68, and Ajaz Patel, who made 35, his highest test score.

It was the sixth-largest partnership for the final wicket in team history and the second-largest by a Kiwi No 10 and No 11, and it was broken up seven runs short of matching the total their team-mates added for wickets three through nine.

Henry and Patel then combined to remove Abdullah Shaffique for 19, the latter taking a catch at deep square leg.

Shan Masood came out playing with intent and hit Patel for three fours in one over, but got greedy and hit the final delivery straight to Devon Conway at point and departed for 20, having only faced 11 balls.

Once Babar and Imam came together, however, they were able to play confidently, as was to be expected on a pitch the two Black Caps tailenders had shown to be lifeless.

Then came the run-out, where Imam stood his ground after calling for a third, then aborting his plans, while Babar charged on. They exchanged blunt words as Babar departed with Pakistan 99-3.

From there New Zealand ramped up the pressure, with the hosts only adding 55 in the final 22.2 overs of the day.

One blemish was a missed catch by Blundell off Michael Bracewell that could have sent Shakeel on his way for an 18-ball duck.

Imam also survived a scare before the run-out, when Daryl Mitchell couldn’t claim a sharp chance off Henry’s bowling at leg gully.

The left-hander brought up his half-century by advancing down the wicket and hitting Bracewell for six and avoided seeing his captain for as long as he possibly could.

Pakistan were still sitting relatively comfortably at the end of play at 154-3, but they would have been more comfortable at 154-2 – or greater, as was likely if Babar and Imam had stayed together. The run-out of Babar was a needless self-inflicted wound, but they at least ensured there was no further damage.

Best with the bat

Only time will tell whose runs were more important in this test – Henry’s or Imam’s. At stumps on day two, Henry gets the nod, as his unbeaten 68 helped the Black Caps post a total 100 runs larger than it might have been otherwise. Having now faced 220 balls in six innings since the start of 2022, might he have earned a promotion over Southee, who has faced 218 in 13 innings in the same period?

Best with the ball

It was not a bowler’s day, but Henry was accurate and maintained good pace throughout as he got through 12 overs with the ball. He claimed one wicket and might have had another, capping a fine all-round day.

The big picture

Two back-and-forth days of test cricket in a row have this match set up nicely as it approaches the halfway point, but the Black Caps will be wary they couldn’t make pressure tell in the final hour, leaving them in need of an early breakthrough on day three. Tom Latham didn’t take the field on day two and was said to be ill, so New Zealand will also be hoping he recovers swiftly.

Stuff NZ

<div style="width: 100%; height: 0px; position: relative; padding-bottom: 56.250%;"><iframe src="https://streamable.com/e/w7xcbj" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="100%" allowfullscreen style="width: 100%; height: 100%; position: absolute;"></iframe></div>
 
Last edited:
There literally is nothing in the wicket. Can one of our batters for once go on and score a big daddy hundred, double century? If you are not going to do it on these Pakistani wickets then where?
 
345 for 9 to 449 all out is nothing short of embarrassing.

Any bowling attack should be ashamed that they let a 10th wicket stand score 104 runs.
 
Pakistan need to get at least on par with NZs 1st inns total. That means imam needs to get a big 100 but saud, Sarfaraz and Agha need to score heavily as well.

I won't be shocked if we get bowled out for less than 300.
 
I am kind of surprised Sodhi bowled only 4 overs. Those footmarks will be more helpful for Sodhi than anyone else. Due to his height he can extract more bounce. Pakistan's innings will depend on how well Sodhi bowls.
 
345 for 9 to 449 all out is nothing short of embarrassing.

Any bowling attack should be ashamed that they let a 10th wicket stand score 104 runs.


Pakistan used to be a bowling side. Not anymore, now just relies 1 or 2 bowlers. one bowler can't get you 10 wickets every time, others will have to contribute. Why is Mir Hamza playing? and Mohd Wasim is not. Wasim At least got a wicket in the last match and also made valuable 43 runs. by what logic Hamza was preferred over him.
Mir Hamza has been brought in to please a regional lobby (thanks to Shahid Afridi). Why not Shahnaawz Dahani then? He belongs to the same region, is performing more. Isn't one failure enough to satisfy the region lobby? Why Pakistan has to suffer? these continuous defeats are going to have a long term effect on Pakistan test cricket, we barely play any tests hence the recovery will take a very long time.
 
Back
Top